Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 1 of 34

I, RICHARD DROGIN, hereby declare:

The facts set forth herein are personally known to me, and I have firsthand knowledge of
same. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
INTRODUCTION
1. I am currently an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Statistics at California State
University, Hayward, where I have taught graduate and undergraduate courses in data analysis,
non-parametric methods, regression analysis, sample surveys, probability theory, queuing theory,
simulation methods and design of statistical software. I have been employed at California State
University, Hayward, since 1973, and became an Emeritus Professor in 1996.
2. I have been retained by Plaintiffs Counsel in the Piper v. RGIS case to serve as a
statistical expert. I have previously submitted declaration in this matter, dated March 7, 2008.
My qualifications are set forth in my resume, which is attached as Appendix 1 to this declaration.
DATA
3. Plaintiff's counsel has provided me with the tables from the RGIS Oracle database that
were produced by RGIS in this case. In addition, I have been provided with various documents
giving an explanation for the contents of, and relationship between these tables. The information
includes the company records for:
a) A data dictionary for the RGIS Oracle database, including a list of all tables, and a list of
all fields in the time and payroll data
b) Personnel data showing all potential class members in California, Oregon, Washington
and Illinois, their dates of employment, and a list of the locations where they worked
c) Payroll data showing hours worked, meal period times, travel time, time spent in stores,
the pay rate for each activity, and the amount paid for each type of activity just listed for
each shift worked
d) Data for all time punch records showing, for each shift, when employees arrive at the
meet site for travel inventories, when they return to the meet site, when they are signed in
at the store, when employees are signed out at the store, and the time of meal breaks.
4. The data includes a history of shifts worked for California, Illinois, Washington, and
Oregon for the period through March 2008. California data begins in August 2003, but there is

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 2 of 34

only limited data until January 2005. Illinois and Washington data begins January 2004. Oregon
data begins in September 2003. There are inventory shifts shown for 17,167 employees in
California 10,123 employees in Illinois, 1,548 employees in Oregon, and 3,033 employees in
Washington.
5. In the entire set of time sheet detail data there are 1,938,395 records that include store
sign in and out times, and show the location of the inventory. Of these records, 51.9% are
California, 29.1% are Illinois, 6.2% are Oregon, and 12.8% as Washington. There are two
categories of inventory shifts: Local Inventories and Travel Inventories. A travel inventory
occurs when an employee goes to a vehicle meet site to be driven to the store where an inventory
is to be taken. Otherwise, the shift is a local inventory. Overall, travel inventories comprise
21.3% of inventories. The percentages of travel inventories by state are 19.2% in California,
22.6% in Illinois, 18.4% in Oregon, and 26.0% in Washington.
DISTRIBUTION OF MINUTES FOR SIGN IN/OUT TIMES
6. Based on the data provided I have compiled the distribution of times when various
events took place that are used in computing earnings of employees. In particular, I found the
distribution of the minute in an hour for the following fields:
a) Store sign in and out time
These are used to determine hours worked doing inventory for an employee and
compensable time1
b) Meal time in and out
This information shows whether an employee took an unpaid meal break, and for how
long.
c) Vehicle meet and return time
These are used to determine travel time and compensable time.
The following paragraphs give a summary of the percent of inventory shifts that show the time
exactly on the hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour. A complete breakdown of these times by minute, by
state, and all states combined, is given in Appendix 2.

Compensable time is used for determination of whether an employee is eligible for a meal break.

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 3 of 34

Store Sign In and Out Times

7. The Time Sheet Detail data shows that 56.3% of store sign in times are exactly on the
hour, 64.8% are exactly on the hour or 1/2 hour, and 70.8% are exactly on the hour, 1/2 hour, or
1/4 hour.2 For store sign out times, 11.8% are on the hour, 23.0% are on the hour or 1/2 hour,
and 32.7% are on the hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour. The following chart shows the distribution of
minute in store sign out times.
Table 1

In this declaration, reference to on the hour means that the minute portion of the time is 0. The
term on the hour or 1/2 hour means that the minute portion of the time is 0 or 30. The term on
hour, 1/2 hour or 1/4 hour means that the minute portion of the time is 0, 15, 30, or 45. The
RGIS time records indicate times only to the minute, seconds are all shown as 00.
3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 4 of 34

Meal Start and End Times

8. For meal break start times, 29.9% are on the hour, 63.4% are on the hour or 1/2 hour,
and 76% are on the hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour. For meal break end times, 30.4% are on the
hour, 61.9% are on the hour or 1/2 hour, and 76.0% are on the hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour.
Vehicle Meet and Return Times
9. For travel inventories, the data shows the vehicle meet and return time. Of the vehicle
meet times, 42.6% are on the hour, 67.7% are on the hour or 1/2 hour, and 92.1% are on the
hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour. Of the vehicle return times, 19.2% are on the hour, 36.4% are on the
hour or 1/2 hour, and 53.0% are on the hour, 1/2 hour, or 1/4 hour. The following chart shows
the distribution of minute in vehicle return times.
Table 2

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 5 of 34

Employees With the Same Store Sign In Times

10. I have counted the number of times employees sign in at a store at exactly the same
time, measured by the date, hour, and minute. There are 1,938,395 instances where employees
sign in for a store inventory shift. Of these instances when employees signed in for their
inventory shift, an employee signed in alone 343,553 times, or 17.9% of the time. In the other
82.1% of times employees signed in, there were two or more employees signing in during the
same minute in the same store. In 39.3% of times employees signed in, there were ten or more
employees signing in during the same minute in the same store. In 21.3% of times employees
signed in, there were twenty or more employees signing in during the same minute in the same
store. Appendix 3 gives a detailed breakdown of these results.
Missed Meal Breaks
11. I have counted the times when no meal break is recorded in the data, when the
employee has worked more than the minimum length of time required3 for a meal break. In
10.8% of 700,461 cases where an employee worked longer than the minimum time required for a
meal break, there is no record of a meal break shown in the data.4 This result breaks down by
state as follows. For shifts longer than the minimum time required for a meal break, in
California employees missed their meal break 4.0% of the time (17,006 missed meals out of
424,291 shifts). In Illinois employees missed their meal break 26.1% of the time (32,806 out of
125,769 shifts). In Washington, employees missed their meal break 20.2% of the time (21,098
out of 104,690 shifts). In Oregon employees missed their meal break 9.6% of the time (4,407
out of 45,711 shifts). See Appendix 5 for detailed results.
Short Meal Breaks
12. I have counted the number of meal breaks that are shorter than the minimum required
length. In 2.8% of 700,461 cases where an employee worked longer than the minimum time

The minimum time varies by state. In California, an employer is required to provide an employee with a 30 minute
meal period for every 5 hours worked. In Oregon, an employer is required to provide an employee with a 30 minute
meal period for every 6 hours worked. In Washington, an employer is required to provide an employee with a 30
minute meal period for every 5 hours worked. In Illinois, a 20 minute meal period must be provided for a shift of
7.5 hours or longer.
4

Cases where there was a meal break waiver are not included.
5

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 6 of 34

required for a meal break, a meal break was taken but was too short.5 This result breaks down by
state as follows: For shifts longer than the minimum time required for a meal break, in
California employees had short meal breaks 2.8% of the time (11,816 short meal breaks out of
424,291 shifts). In Illinois employees had short meal breaks 0.2% of the time (218 out of
125,769 shifts). In Washington, employees had short meal breaks 3.4% of the time 3,531 out of
104,690 shifts). In Oregon employees missed their meal break 8.4% of the time (3,818 out of
45,711 shifts). See Appendix 6 for detailed results.
Other Analyses and Issues
13. At the time of writing this declaration, there are still several data files that have not
yet been produced. If such data were provided I could perform additional studies.
a) The schedule data has not yet been provided. This would permit comparison of
scheduled store start time with sign-in time.
b) Plaintiffs have requested but have not received time record edit logs that would show
instances when RGIS changed original time entries. If such data are provided, it would
enable me to perform an analysis of whether or not there is a pattern of the actual time
being adjusted upward or downward.
c) Defendant provided a database purportedly containing information on gross earnings,
including overtime pay, on the afternoon of July 3, 2008. Due to the lateness of
production I have not yet been able to do an analysis of this data.
d) There is some unresolved inconsistency between various files. For example, there are
38,072 distinct PERSON_IDs that are common to the time sheet detail files and the
per_all_people_f file. (The per_all_people_f file gives a list of names and unique id
numbers.) However, there are 14,471 PERSON_IDs appearing in the time sheet detail
files that do not appear in the per_all_people_f file. and there are 4,645 PERSON_IDs in
the per_all_people_f file that are not appear in the time sheet detail files.6 Thus, the
RGIS data produced to me does not contain time records for 4,645 persons.

Cases where there was a meal break waiver are not included.
The time sheet detail file consists of all the records from the rgis_time_sheet_details and the
rgis_ts_dtl_archive files for each state. The PERSON_ID is supposed to be a unique person
identifier.
6

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 7 of 34

Declarant Statement
I make this Declaration under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State
of California this 10th day of July 2008 at Berkeley, California.

__________________________
Richard Drogin, Ph. D.

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Exhibit A

Page 8 of 34

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 9 of 34

Exhibit A
Vita of RICHARD DROGIN
rdrogin@dkstat.com
www.dkstat.com
CURRENT POSITIONS
Professor Emeritus of Statistics, Calif. State University, Hayward, CA, since 1996;
Partner in Drogin, Kakigi and Associates, Statistical Consultants, since 1977;
PRIOR WORK EXPERIENCE
Professor of Statistics, Calif. State University, Hayward, CA, 1973-96;
Currently Professor Emeritus;
Ass't Professor of Mathematical Statistics, Columbia University, N.Y., 1971-73;
Faculty Fellow, Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton, England, 1970-71;
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley, 1967-70, Statistics, Ph.D.;
Columbia University, New York, 1966-67, Statistics;
University of California, Berkeley, 1961-66, A.B.;
JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
"An Invariance Principle for Martingales", Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 43,
No. 2, 1972, pp. 602-620;
"Convergence in Probability to Brownian Motion", Annals of Probability, Vol. 1, No.
2, April, 1973, pp. 254-262;
Co-author, with Michael Orkin, of "Risky Business", a review of the
spreadsheet/simulation program PREDICT, appeared in PC World, October, 1987,
pps 178-183;
BOOK PUBLICATION
Vital Statistics, (Co-Author, Michael Orkin), McGraw Hill, 1974;
SOFTWARE
Developer of NIGHTSHIFT program, an artificial intelligence
system utilizing genetic algorithms to identify patterns in
databases (1995);
Certified Apple Software Developer, and member of Apple Programmer's and
Developer's Association; May, 1987 to 1993;
Beta tester for Borland International for Turbo Pascal for the Macintosh (1986-87),
and Turbo Pascal Database Toolbox for the Macintosh (1987);
Co-developer, with Michael Orkin, of "THE EXPERT": artificial intelligence system
for identifying patterns in football and basketball data for PC's, 1990, and other
sports database programs;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 10 of 34

Exhibit A
Co-developer, with Micharel Orkin and Roxy Roxborough, of ROXYS POWER
RATINGS, a power ratings system for pro-football for PCs, 1990;
LEGAL CONSULTING
Testified as expert witness in statistics over twenty times in federal, state, and
superior Court;
A partial list of clients includes the Equal Employment Opportunity, The California
State Department of Fair Employment and Housing, the Federal Public Defender's
Office, Office of Civil Rights, Littler Mendelson Fastiff Tichy Mathiason, Morrison &
Foerster, the Alameda County Public Defender's Office, the City Attorney's Office of
Oakland, Legal Aid Society of Alameda County, San Francisco Neighborhood Legal
Assistance, Public Advocates, Equal Rights Advocates, the Employment Law
Center, Center for Law in the Public Interest, California Teachers Association,
Internation Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, California State Employees
Association, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and the
NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the law firm of Saperstein, Goldstein, Demchak and
Baller, the law firm of Sprenger and Lang, the law firm of Rudy, Excelrod and Zieff;
the law firm of Righetti and Wynne, the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann and
Bernstein, and The Impact Fund.
OTHER CONSULTING
Retained as court appointed statistical expert in Consolidated Class Actions v.
Sunshine Communications, Case No. GIC 780641, Superior Court of California, San
Diego County, 2003.
Retained by the California State Department of Fair Employment and Housing to
analyze employment data for Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 2001;
Retained by Office of Civil Rights, Department of Education, to analyze law school
admission and criteria for several University of California Law Schools, 1997-8;
Calculation of probabilities of various card game outcomes for Casino San Pablo,
1996-7;
Custom programming to produce summaries of personnel data for California
hospital associations, 1996-7;
Analysis of phone quality data for J Walter Thompson advertising agency, 1990;
Sample design and review of drug testing program for IBEW, 1990;
Sample design and analysis of data for BART study of commuter patterns, 1989;
Development of market research multiple regression software package for Gazette
Press, Inc., 1987
Analysis of employment patterns among Operating Engineers, Local 3, for the
Affirmative Action Trust Fund, appointed by defendants and plaintiffs, 1986-87;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 11 of 34

Exhibit A
Analysis of 1970 and 1980 census data regarding changes in occupational status of
women, Institute for the Study of Social Change, U.C., Berkeley, July, 1984;
Analysis of University Admissions data at U.C., Berkeley, for Student Affirmative
Action Advisory Committee, September, 1982;
Analysis of employment patterns and opinion survey data for the U.S. Forest
Service, in preparation of an affirmative action plan, 1981-82;
Analysis of housing sales in the Fruitvale and West Oakland areas of Oakland for
Oakland Community Organization, 1980-81;
Statistical consultant on survey of Mexican Immigration patterns, 1980-81;
Statistical analysis of Law School Admissions data for Mexican American Legal
Defense and Education Fund, 1980;
Develop statistical analysis of California Loan Registry Data for Legal Aid Society of
Alameda County, Legal Aid Society of Los Angeles, California Rural Legal
Assistance, San Francisco neighborhood Legal Assistance, and Public Advocates,
1978-81;
INVITED LECTURES & SEMINARS
Panelist at Lawyers Coordinating Committee AFL-CIO Southern California Regional
Conference, Statistical Sampling in Wage and Hour Cases, October 30, 2007
Panelist at American Conference Institutes 5th National Forum on Wage Hour
Litigation, October 4, 2007
Panelist at California Employment Lawyers Association Conference, May 11, 2007,
Using Expert Testimony
Panelist at ABA Labor & Employment Law Conference, March 29, 2001,
breakout session on the "Use of Statistical Evidence in Employment
Discrimination Litigation"
Presented seminar on statistical methods and expert witness testimony in Title
VII cases at Hastings School of Law, February, 1997, March, 1998, and February,
1999;
Appeared on cable TV interview show to discuss statistical
analysis in employement discrimination litigation, Calif. State
University, Hayward, CA, November 10, 1995;
Presented lecture on computers, databases, and statistical proof
in large class action lawsuits, at the Litigating Civil and
Statuory Class Actions conference, Hastings College of Law, April 30, 1994;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 12 of 34

Exhibit A
Presented a seminar on statistical methods in age discrimination cases for Practicing
Law Institute, February 13, 1987;
Presented seminar on statistical methods at Golden Gate University Law School,
February, 1983;
Presented one day seminar for attorneys and staff of the State Department of Fair
Employment and Housing, on statistical methods, February 5, 1982;
Presented a talk to the American Statistical Association meeting, February, 1982, on
statistical methods used in Title VII cases;
Presented talks at the MALDEF-EEOC conferences on discrimination and the Law,
San Francisco, June, 1978, and Los Angeles, October, 1978;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 13 of 34

Exhibit A
DECLARATIONS and TESTIMONY
since 1990
Dr. Richard Drogin
as of March 2008
CHOU V. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Case No. GIC 836925, County of San
Diego, Superior Court of the State of California, declarations, November 16, 2007, and
February 28, 2008, deposition March 2008, trial testimony March 12, 2008.
TRISHA WREN and CYNTHIA PIPER V. RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS,
DARA FRESCO V. CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE, Case No.: C06-05778 JCS, District Court, Northern District, California, declaration, March 2008.
JANTZ V. SSA, EEOC No. 531-2006-00276X, Agency No. HQ-06-2518-SSA, EQUAL
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, BALTIMORE DISTRICT OFFICE.
Declaration, November 2007.
Court File No. 07-CV-334112CP, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, ONTARIO,
CANADA, affidavit, November 13, 2007.
CICAIROS V. SUMMIT LOGISTIC INC. AND BLUEFORD V. SAFEWAY INC.,
Case No. CV014837, County of San Joaquin Stockton Branch of the State of
California; declaration, October 1, 2007.
CLAUSNITZER V. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., Civil Action No. 06-21457-CIVAltonage/Turnoff, United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami
Division; declaration September 14, 2007
WARD V. ALBERTSON, Case No. BC237646, County of Los Angeles, Superior Court
of the State of California, declaration, May 2007
DURAN V. US.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATE,Case No. 2001-035537, County of
Alameda, Superior Court of the State of California, declaration, deposition, June 2006,
April 2007
HOHNBAUM V. BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION, Case No. GIC 834348,
San Diego, Superior Court, State of California, declaration May 2006;
ROCHER et al. V. SAV-ON DRUG STORES, INC., Case No. BC 227720, Los Angeles
Superior Court, State of California, declaration, March 2006;
FOSTER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS, No. BC 282300, Los Angeles County Superior
Court, State of California; declaration, February 2006
Coordinating Proceeding Special Title (Rule) 1550(b)-Shake Roof Cases;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 14 of 34

Exhibit A
Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4208, Superior Court of the State of
California, Contra Costa County; report, deposition and trial 2005.
ELLIS V. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Case No. C-04-3341 MHP, U.S.
District Court, Northern District, California, declaration, May 2005, May 2006,
November 2006.
Coordinating Proceeding Special Title (Rule) 1550(b)-Staples Overtime Cases;
Case No.:4235, lead Case No. 816121, Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Orange; deposition April 2005.
SATCHELL V. FEDERAL EXPRESS, C 03-2659 SI; C 03-2878 SI, U.S. District Court,
Northern District, California, various declarations and deposition, 2004.
PARRA V. BASHAS INC., Case No. CIV 02 0591 PHX RCB, U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona, declaration and deposition, July 2004.
ERVIN V. RATELLE, Case N. BS 215587, Superior Court of The State of California,
County of San Diego; deposition, January 2004.
SYLVESTER MCCLAIN v. LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC., Case No. 9:97-CV-063,
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, report, deposition, trial 2003.
GARRETT CUTLER v. WAL-MART STORES, No., CA-02-10206, Circuit Court for
Prince George County, Maryland, declaration and deposition, 2003.
CRYSTAL SALVAS v. WAL-MART STORES, No. 01-3645, Middlesex, Superior
Court Department, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, declaration and deposition, 2003
RICHISON v. AMERICAN CEMWOOD, Case No. 005532, San Jouquin County
Superior Court, State of California; declarations, deposition, 2002-3.
DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC., C-01-2252 MJJ, , U.S. District Court, Northern District,
California, various declarations and deposition, 2003.
SALGADU v. MABUBANI, et. al, No, CV01-04360 FMC, Central District of
California, declaration 2002, deposition January, 2003.
MITCHELL, et. al. v.METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., 01 Civ.2112 (WHP)
declaration December 2002 and deposition January, 2003.
SAVAGLIO V. WAL-MART STORES, CASE NO. 835687-7 Superior Court of The
State of California, County of Alameda; declaration and deposition, December 2002.
STONE V. FIRST UNION CORP., NO. 94-6932-CIV-GOLD, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, declaration, 2002, deposition 2005.

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 15 of 34

Exhibit A

BELL V. FARMERS INSURANCE, NO.774013-0, Alameda County Superior Court,

State of California; declarations, deposition,1999-2001, trial testimony 2001; Appeal
decision 115 Cal.App.4th 715 (2004)
YBARRA et al V. CALIFORNIA REDI-DATE COMPANY, No. CV 00-7043/7044
U.S. District Court, Northern District, California, declaration and deposition, 2001;
AGUARDO et al. V. PIZZA HUT, San Francisco County Superior Court, State of
California, Case No. 994947; declaration February 2001;
BROOKS V. FIRST UNION, Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex Country, No. L2401-99; declarations February 2001 and 2002, deposition 2005;
SINGLETON V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, No. 807233-1,
Alameda County Superior Court, State of California; declarations and deposition 2000-2;
BECKMANN V. WCCO et. al., File No. 3-96 Civ. 1172, declaration and deposition,
1999;
CHARLES V. SECRETARY OF NAVY, C 91-2153 MHP, declaration, 1998;
JARVAISE V. RAND Corp, NO 1:96CV02680 (HHG); declaration and deposition,
1998;
TURNER V. TOROTEL, INC., No. 96-0646-CV-W-5, declaration and deposition, 1998;
BUTLER v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., No. C 95-2182 SI, U.S. District Court,
Northern District, California, various declaration and deposition, 1997;
CANADY V. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., NO. 96-0174-CV-W-2,
U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri, Western Division; declaration 1997;
BYRD v. SPRINT CORPORATION, ET AL., No. CV92-18979, Circuit Court of
Jackson County, Missouri at Kansas City; declaration 1996;
SHORES v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., No. 95-1162-CIV-T-25E, U.S. District
Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division; declarations submitted for class
certification, 1995; presentation to mediator in settlement talks 1996;
PLUMMER v. DON COTE, ALAMEDA COUNTY, C-94-0838 EFL, Superior Court,
Alameda County, California; declaration submitted, February, 1996;
JONES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, No. 95-MD-1044, 95-71123, 3-93-370, Eastern
District of Michigan, Southern Division; declarations submitted for class certification,
deposition, 1995-1996, 1998;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 16 of 34

Exhibit A

APPLETON, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, No. 3-95-0483 (Middle District of Tennessee);

declaration submitted for class certification, deposition, 1995, 1996;
FRANK V. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., N.D. Cal. Case No C92 0692 CAL declarations
and deposition, 1995-96;
ROBERT ADAMS, JR. v. PINOLE POINT STEEL COMPANY, NO. C-92-1962 MHP,
U.S. District Court, Northern District, California; declaration submitted for class
certification, deposition 1993, 1994, 1995;
SONDRA W. HYMAN v. FIRST UNION CORPORATON, Civil No. 94-1043 (EGS),
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia; various declarations, 1994, 1995, 1997;
WHITING v. HUNTER, MO. 676752-50H, Alameda Country Superior Court,
California; deposition and trial testimony, 1995, 1996;
BABBITT v. ALBERTSONS INC., No. C92 1883 SBA (PJH), Northern District of
California; declarations, 1994;
TAYLOR v. OCHARLEYS, No. 3:94-0489, U.S. District Court, Middle District of
Tennessee; declarations, 1994;
BARBARA JEAN HERRING v. SAVE MART, No. C-90-3571 BAC, U.S. District
Court, Northern District, California, December 17, 1993;
NANCY J. STENDER v. LUCKY STORES, Inc, No. C-88-1467 MHP, U.S. District
Court, Northern District, California, 1991 & 1992, deposed and submitted reports for
liability and damage trials;
HAYNES v. SHONEY, No. PCA 89-30093-RV, U.S. District Court, Northern District
of Florida; declaration submitted for class certification, 1991;
PINES v. STATE FARM, SA CV 89 - 631 AHS (RWRx), U.S. District Court, central
District of California; declaration submitted for class certification, 1991;
SIBI SOROKA, SUE URRY, and WILLIAM DARCANGELO v. DAYTON HUDSON
CORP., dba TARGET STORES, No. H-143579-3, Superior Court, County of Alameda,
California; declaration 1990;

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 17 of 34

Exhibit A
DROGIN, KAKIGI & ASSOCIATES
Statistical Consultants
3104 Shattuck Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94705
(510) 540-5071
www.dkstat.com

FEE SCHEDULE as of March 2008

1. Consulting, analysis, development
Partners
Staff programmer

$300/hour
$150/hour

2. Deposition/Testimony

$400/hour

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 18 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 1

Distribution of Minutes in Store Time In

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 1938395
1005540
564527
248735
119593
0 or 30 1257049
0 15 30 45 1372267

64.8
70.8

586759
643072

58.4
64.0

418408
450010

74.1
79.7

167347
190238

67.3
76.5

84535
88947

70.7
74.4

0 1091455
1
21216
2
13649
3
11718
4
10007
5
19660
6
11334
7
7992
8
7898
9
6583
10
22319
11
6222
12
8346
13
5352
14
4721
15
36003
16
5332
17
4221
18
5854
19
3913
20
21042
21
4437
22
4092
23
3930
24
4911
25
11459
26
4454
27
4231
28
4243
29
3889
30 165594
31
5820
32
3883
33
3669
34
3248
35
19655
36
5868
37
4189
38
4223
39
3534
40
16523
41
4032
42
5317
43
3804
44
3993
45
79215
46
5829
47
5392
48
7948
49
6214
50
54752
51
10360
52
10532

56.3
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
1.9
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
8.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
4.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
2.8
0.5
0.5

488564
11607
8899
7532
6370
11521
6361
5057
4787
4139
11887
3875
4305
3255
2988
18454
2996
2571
2993
2392
12423
2793
2562
2516
2833
7084
2835
2848
2834
2658
98195
3289
2540
2445
2147
15737
3590
2900
2714
2351
8810
2326
2705
2215
2362
37859
3195
3272
4101
4185
46080
7898
7723

48.6
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.6
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
1.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
9.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
3.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
4.6
0.8
0.8

376737
5084
1994
1920
1685
4551
2981
1518
1734
1313
6621
1246
2762
1200
998
10964
1309
927
1919
885
5505
882
880
823
1371
2690
881
760
788
643
41671
1203
756
648
618
2173
1312
705
915
735
4496
989
1700
932
1035
20638
1343
1144
2255
1158
4997
1303
1598

66.7
0.9
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
1.9
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
7.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
3.7
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.3

148934
2744
1849
1494
1265
2446
1252
917
923
757
2568
766
819
629
509
4745
721
490
584
420
2164
547
454
384
452
1204
512
453
435
420
18413
893
400
399
324
1205
605
430
394
299
2363
492
616
426
404
18146
936
741
1260
626
2502
811
827

59.9
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.9
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
7.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
7.3
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3

77220
1781
907
772
687
1142
740
500
454
374
1243
335
460
268
226
1840
306
233
358
216
950
215
196
207
255
481
226
170
186
168
7315
435
187
177
159
540
361
154
200
149
854
225
296
231
192
2572
355
235
332
245
1173
348
384

64.6
1.5
0.8
0.6
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.2
1.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
6.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
2.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 19 of 34

Appendix 2
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

10878
13626
42235
16081
16681
17747
17070

0.6
0.7
2.2
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9

7896
8821
24287
10672
10683
11531
11072

0.8
0.9
2.4
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1

1515
2815
14242
1909
1903
2116
2132

0.3
0.5
2.5
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4

Page 2
910
1171
2309
2008
2307
2366
2295

0.4
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9

557
819
1397
1492
1788
1734
1571

0.5
0.7
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 20 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 3

Distribution of Minutes in Store Time Out

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 1938395
1005540
564527
248735
119593
0 or 30
0 15 30 45

446617
633372

23.0
32.7

217694
305759

21.6
30.4

153577
212191

27.2
37.6

53149
80966

21.4
32.6

22197
34456

18.6
28.8

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

229150
14449
16049
15992
14723
42862
27933
17781
18239
13866
60834
14744
29020
15399
14932
89509
17032
16075
27302
13692
65848
15723
17722
15509
23139
46855
16149
14985
15307
12505
217467
14299
17341
16614
15099
47502
29022
17484
18166
13772
66261
15281
26305
15645
14451
97246
17747
16925
27583
13556
65825
15301

11.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
2.2
1.4
0.9
0.9
0.7
3.1
0.8
1.5
0.8
0.8
4.6
0.9
0.8
1.4
0.7
3.4
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.2
2.4
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
11.2
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.8
2.5
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.7
3.4
0.8
1.4
0.8
0.7
5.0
0.9
0.9
1.4
0.7
3.4
0.8

103385
8526
9141
9241
8353
22683
12344
9625
9911
7991
30275
8645
12665
8574
8481
41513
9386
9077
12222
7893
32100
8808
9812
9083
11056
23842
9076
8816
8825
7717
114309
8713
9934
9495
8508
24334
12928
9938
10015
8133
32586
8998
12189
8805
8335
46552
9646
9537
12506
7837
32522
8961

10.3
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
2.3
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.8
3.0
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.8
4.1
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.8
3.2
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.1
2.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
11.4
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.8
2.4
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.8
3.2
0.9
1.2
0.9
0.8
4.6
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.8
3.2
0.9

84890
3372
3927
3857
3502
11360
10043
4947
4880
3403
17913
3525
10925
4031
3615
28740
4341
3991
10146
3305
20053
3973
4493
3665
7768
12803
3964
3378
3645
2412
68687
3154
4111
3951
3678
13193
10472
4193
4714
3141
19915
3471
9133
3838
3346
29874
4530
3976
9691
3081
19745
3350

15.0
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
2.0
1.8
0.9
0.9
0.6
3.2
0.6
1.9
0.7
0.6
5.1
0.8
0.7
1.8
0.6
3.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
1.4
2.3
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
12.2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
2.3
1.9
0.7
0.8
0.6
3.5
0.6
1.6
0.7
0.6
5.3
0.8
0.7
1.7
0.5
3.5
0.6

29219
1737
2041
1996
1913
6166
3608
2200
2251
1634
8844
1782
3374
1790
1926
13338
2233
2047
3044
1667
9471
1901
2333
1856
2632
6982
2008
1898
1855
1572
23930
1526
2162
2010
1877
6821
3355
2215
2212
1610
9422
1916
3086
1943
1857
14479
2295
2343
3332
1767
9191
1910

11.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
2.5
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.7
3.6
0.7
1.4
0.7
0.8
5.4
0.9
0.8
1.2
0.7
3.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.1
2.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
9.6
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
2.7
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.6
3.8
0.8
1.2
0.8
0.7
5.8
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.7
3.7
0.8

11656
814
940
898
955
2653
1938
1009
1197
838
3802
792
2056
1004
910
5918
1072
960
1890
827
4224
1041
1084
905
1683
3228
1101
893
982
804
10541
906
1134
1158
1036
3154
2267
1138
1225
888
4338
896
1897
1059
913
6341
1276
1069
2054
871
4367
1080

9.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
2.2
1.6
0.8
1.0
0.7
3.2
0.7
1.7
0.8
0.8
4.9
0.9
0.8
1.6
0.7
3.5
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.4
2.7
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.7
8.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
2.6
1.9
1.0
1.0
0.7
3.6
0.7
1.6
0.9
0.8
5.3
1.1
0.9
1.7
0.7
3.7
0.9

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 21 of 34

Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

19102
16047
23174
45213
17045
14602
15582
35413

1.0
0.8
1.2
2.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.8

10287
9311
11950
23486
9790
8514
8922
29433

1.0
0.9
1.2
2.3
1.0
0.8
0.9
2.9

5030
3664
6499
11679
3834
3309
3501
2900

0.9
0.6
1.2
2.1
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5

Page 4
2480
2049
2687
6710
2243
1889
2040
2060

1.0
0.8
1.1
2.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8

1305
1023
2038
3338
1178
890
1119
1020

1.1
0.9
1.7
2.8
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.9

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 22 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 5

Distribution of Minutes in Meal Start Time

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 735702
468632
124765
89271
53034
0 or 30
0 15 30 45

466119
558773

63.4
76.0

293162
351613

62.6
75.0

89242
100222

71.5
80.3

50906
68616

57.0
76.9

32809
38322

61.9
72.3

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

220050
3288
2804
2651
2504
5518
2311
1818
1724
1523
6707
1217
1323
1200
1316
32278
1774
1608
1746
1460
7980
1504
1398
1281
1816
5024
1637
1997
2329
3507
246069
6163
5508
5204
4915
8446
4069
3479
3133
2481
16484
1989
2095
1937
1978
60376
2457
2345
2528
1983
9115
1624

29.9
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
4.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
33.4
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
2.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
8.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.2
0.2

127118
2154
1902
1812
1682
3565
1479
1239
1219
1116
4081
827
902
805
958
20734
1214
1094
1218
1025
5733
1057
1015
957
1352
3457
1239
1447
1678
2530
166044
4413
4027
3848
3764
6389
3148
2602
2414
1867
5791
1547
1586
1438
1417
37717
1541
1435
1475
1153
6063
956

27.1
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
4.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
35.4
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
8.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.3
0.2

51657
313
210
232
212
1071
316
196
190
150
1607
153
179
148
118
4025
189
135
179
101
1027
132
88
101
127
404
89
122
117
114
37585
285
228
272
159
868
291
249
225
163
9407
130
188
150
169
6955
241
251
326
226
1070
203

41.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
3.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
30.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
7.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
5.6
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.2

26898
404
353
287
314
475
275
190
175
145
668
145
139
138
130
4865
172
153
161
143
566
152
144
105
146
752
111
136
195
323
24008
782
578
536
529
723
347
353
278
278
886
176
169
169
264
12845
425
445
526
406
1421
299

30.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
5.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
26.9
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
14.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.6
0.3

14377
417
339
320
296
407
241
193
140
112
351
92
103
109
110
2654
199
226
188
191
654
163
151
118
191
411
198
292
339
540
18432
683
675
548
463
466
283
275
216
173
400
136
152
180
128
2859
250
214
201
198
561
166

27.1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
5.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.6
1.0
34.8
1.3
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
5.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.1
0.3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 23 of 34

Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

1570
1455
3265
5800
1355
1229
1516
1841

0.2
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3

1010
1019
2118
3492
850
754
967
1178

0.2
0.2
0.5
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3

157
121
142
482
143
130
124
123

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

Page 6
228
200
862
1617
233
233
268
327

0.3
0.2
1.0
1.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4

175
115
143
209
129
112
157
213

0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 24 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 7

Distribution of Minutes in Meal End Time

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 735695
468627
124764
89270
53034
0 or 30
0 15 30 45

455184
559083

61.9
76.0

279185
348724

59.6
74.4

92005
103762

73.7
83.2

51337
68257

57.5
76.5

32657
38340

61.6
72.3

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

223532
4195
3991
4064
3854
7204
3953
3516
3057
2928
9562
2447
2704
2480
2684
59697
3341
2850
3113
2183
10095
1852
1824
1569
2715
5935
1766
1510
1815
2117
231652
3138
2651
2503
2472
7066
2469
2041
1922
1972
8596
1514
1662
1425
1487
44202
1907
1583
1764
1430
8861
1525

30.4
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
1.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
8.1
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
31.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
6.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.2
0.2

156704
3019
2932
3069
2904
5214
2955
2654
2391
2307
6432
1944
2028
1926
2029
41488
2405
2043
1919
1452
6360
1243
1248
1095
1618
3578
1062
847
1015
1185
122481
1950
1670
1616
1660
4958
1548
1443
1346
1517
4676
1044
1030
933
1024
28051
1200
1066
1112
946
5995
1085

33.4
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
8.9
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
26.1
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
6.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.3
0.2

27341
214
179
207
167
870
321
201
186
160
1852
150
247
129
147
4990
190
159
197
178
1806
158
146
147
195
567
266
203
259
273
64664
385
332
305
279
1252
398
207
254
165
2591
175
336
185
150
6767
264
199
234
161
1657
179

21.9
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
4.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
51.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
2.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
5.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.1

20892
417
349
326
367
629
375
322
285
268
897
211
269
245
337
10422
543
466
801
396
1356
304
273
208
753
1570
263
277
316
418
30445
450
357
307
306
477
294
219
184
164
863
173
167
159
157
6498
239
173
247
165
564
125

23.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
11.7
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.4
1.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.8
1.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
34.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
7.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.1

18595
545
531
462
416
491
302
339
195
193
381
142
160
180
171
2797
203
182
196
157
573
147
157
119
149
220
175
183
225
241
14062
353
292
275
227
379
229
172
138
126
466
122
129
148
156
2886
204
145
171
158
645
136

35.1
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
5.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
26.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
5.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.2
0.3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 25 of 34

Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

1364
1402
1941
5211
1818
2014
2291
3259

0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4

987
997
1337
3390
1266
1397
1574
2262

0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5

128
116
182
569
121
127
101
176

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

Page 8
115
142
196
771
142
139
200
277

0.1
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3

134
147
226
481
289
351
416
544

0.3
0.3
0.4
0.9
0.5
0.7
0.8
1.0

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 26 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 9

Distribution of Minutes in Vehicle Meet Time

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 412206
193030
127580
64559
27037
0 or 30
0 15 30 45

278987
379480

67.7
92.1

130908
175324

67.8
90.8

87816
118385

68.8
92.8

38870
59979

60.2
92.9

21393
25792

79.1
95.4

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

175481
318
95
87
143
1056
187
118
118
121
2308
94
447
109
195
54244
134
75
688
120
4281
104
72
42
178
1149
88
115
52
626
103506
129
48
101
207
1401
160
85
166
120
2671
98
968
83
287
46249
101
72
293
141
5583
173

42.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
13.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
25.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
11.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.4
0.0

77431
123
74
66
104
694
107
83
60
50
1153
56
82
81
103
25722
78
55
90
76
2264
70
49
22
88
787
47
45
29
257
53477
46
22
56
179
1012
73
61
147
63
1497
60
60
67
93
18694
43
48
78
84
4076
118

40.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
13.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
27.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.1

58472
64
18
19
19
184
45
16
42
49
542
24
325
14
58
13961
30
11
565
36
1178
12
10
13
66
205
39
66
21
160
29344
56
5
38
13
282
45
12
7
26
667
23
884
3
107
16608
28
10
192
32
628
31

45.8
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
10.9
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
23.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.1
13.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.5
0.0

23360
12
1
2
16
133
31
12
13
19
518
13
18
14
20
12511
25
2
25
3
744
18
13
3
13
114
2
2
2
189
15510
13
12
7
11
87
36
10
9
31
381
2
14
13
79
8598
5
9
22
19
644
22

36.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
24.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
13.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0

16218
119
2
0
4
45
4
7
3
3
95
1
22
0
14
2050
1
7
8
5
95
4
0
4
11
43
0
2
0
20
5175
14
9
0
4
20
6
2
3
0
126
13
10
0
8
2349
25
5
1
6
235
2

60.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
7.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
19.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.7
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 27 of 34

Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

104
112
163
1457
152
115
168
4448

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1

85
86
78
925
129
74
118
1535

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.8

13
16
29
189
16
12
19
1981

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6

Page 10
6
8
49
210
2
26
29
847

0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3

0
2
7
133
5
3
2
85

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 28 of 34

Appendix 2

Page 11

Distribution of Minutes in Vehicle Return Time

==============================================
Minute
Total
Calif.
Illinois
Wash.
Oregon
---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------Total 412201
193025
127580
64559
27037
0 or 30
0 15 30 45

149963
218270

36.4
53.0

64869
96313

33.6
49.9

52869
73062

41.4
57.3

23425
35731

36.3
55.3

8800
13164

32.5
48.7

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

78938
1713
1180
1476
1140
9370
3672
1597
1663
993
16257
1329
3623
1269
1168
33285
1892
1394
3590
1148
18574
1618
1599
1183
2905
10408
1551
1155
1158
926
71025
1771
1577
1482
1290
10911
3901
1837
1696
1188
17718
1400
3228
1440
1067
35022
2104
1680
3653
1120
16847
1722

19.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
2.3
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.2
3.9
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.3
8.1
0.5
0.3
0.9
0.3
4.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.7
2.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
17.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
2.6
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.3
4.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.3
8.5
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.3
4.1
0.4

33746
842
694
845
657
4848
1384
830
919
513
8174
736
1223
706
708
15352
950
790
1212
613
9083
826
927
664
1159
5451
900
608
668
595
31123
821
842
843
756
5647
1499
975
901
663
8641
721
1177
716
638
16092
1020
914
1321
705
8645
877

17.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
2.5
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.3
4.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.4
8.0
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.3
4.7
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.6
2.8
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
16.1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
2.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.3
4.5
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.3
8.3
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.4
4.5
0.5

28254
478
241
409
264
2092
1581
445
429
298
4470
311
1656
324
260
9732
525
329
1859
314
5187
434
380
257
1139
2501
359
329
262
152
24615
545
419
438
281
2632
1727
482
422
353
4855
372
1512
373
221
10461
582
392
1496
218
4344
564

22.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.6
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
3.5
0.2
1.3
0.3
0.2
7.6
0.4
0.3
1.5
0.2
4.1
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.9
2.0
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
19.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
2.1
1.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
3.8
0.3
1.2
0.3
0.2
8.2
0.5
0.3
1.2
0.2
3.4
0.4

12298
273
135
177
125
1662
487
195
181
100
2642
194
433
104
120
6008
300
187
308
129
2943
228
215
169
397
1705
228
142
180
114
11127
280
213
140
198
1745
437
218
235
96
3004
205
318
240
138
6298
359
246
433
143
2559
214

19.0
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
2.6
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
4.1
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.2
9.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.2
4.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.6
2.6
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
17.2
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
2.7
0.7
0.3
0.4
0.1
4.7
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.2
9.8
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.2
4.0
0.3

4640
120
110
45
94
768
220
127
134
82
971
88
311
135
80
2193
117
88
211
92
1361
130
77
93
210
751
64
76
48
65
4160
125
103
61
55
887
238
162
138
76
1218
102
221
111
70
2171
143
128
403
54
1299
67

17.2
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.3
2.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.3
3.6
0.3
1.2
0.5
0.3
8.1
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.3
5.0
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.8
2.8
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
15.4
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
3.3
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.3
4.5
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.3
8.0
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.2
4.8
0.2

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 29 of 34

Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

1910
1243
2959
9615
1494
1179
1191
1157

0.5
0.3
0.7
2.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3

933
719
1199
5156
830
620
679
729

0.5
0.4
0.6
2.7
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4

503
268
1064
2128
288
312
249
193

0.4
0.2
0.8
1.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2

Page 12
312
160
397
1669
243
164
216
173

0.5
0.2
0.6
2.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3

162
96
299
662
133
83
47
62

0.6
0.4
1.1
2.4
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Appendix 3

Distribution of Nbr Employees

With Exact Same STORE_TIME_IN
In Same Store
==============================
Number
Employees
Frequency
---------- ---------1
343553
2
105223
3
49381
4
28530
5
18614
6
13205
7
10131
8
7753
9
6086
10
4904
11
4205
12
3400
13
2924
14
2414
15
2206
16
1802
17
1565
18
1467
19
1350
20
1187
21
1102
22
1011
23
886
24
849
25
732
26
634
27
626
28
527
29
523
30
441
31
394
32
318
33
319
34
256
35
240
36
225
37
236
38
199
39
185
40
161
41
154
42
131
43
154
44
125
45
104
46
103
47
89
48
77
49
76
50
73

Page 30 of 34

Page 1

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Appendix 3

51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100

59
47
44
43
35
31
41
36
33
30
27
29
18
17
19
24
17
12
10
13
18
5
11
15
6
12
8
7
7
16
7
5
10
6
4
7
8
2
5
2
3
6
4
5
3
1
2
2
2
6

Page 31 of 34

Page 2

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 32 of 34

Appendix 4

Distribution of Meal Break Length

=================================
Meal Break Length in Minutes
Percent
------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------State Total 1 -29
30 31 -44
45 46 -59
60
>60
30
30+45 30+45+60
----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----CA
468604 14251 356578 52187 28137
8330
6919
2202
76.1
82.1
83.6
IL
124760
2890 74635
8819 10027 10906 16838
645
59.8
67.9
81.4
WA
89265
3773 64971
7351
9018
1972
1319
861
72.8
82.9
84.4
OR
53027
5034 41399
5099
423
332
557
183
78.1
78.9
79.9
Total 735656 25948 537583 73456 47605 21540 25633
3891
73.1
79.5
83.0

Page 1

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 33 of 34

Appendix 5

Page 1

Frequency of Missed Meal Breaks

===============================
Restricted to shifts longer than minimum hours for a meal break
Minimum Hours for Meal Break:
California
5
hours
Illinois
7.5 hours
Washington
5
hours
Oregon
6
hours
Waiver Y/N
---------Total
Total
Total

Local Y/N
---------Local
Travel
Total

Meal Y/N
---------Total
Total
Total

Total
-----589167
251486
840653

CA
IL
WA
OR
------ ------ ------ -----397819 76067 88258 27023
133113 52515 47170 18688
530932 128582 135428 45711

Waiver
Waiver
Waiver

Local
Travel
Total

Total
Total
Total

116822 88923
23370 17718
140192 106641

2541
272
2813

25358
5380
30738

0
0
0

No
No
No
No

Waiver
Waiver
Waiver
Waiver

Local
Local
Local
Local

Meal
No Meal
Total
% No Meal

429856 301275
42489
7621
472345 308896
9.0
2.5

53567
19959
73526
27.1

49598
13302
62900
21.1

25416
1607
27023
5.9

No
No
No
No

Waiver
Waiver
Waiver
Waiver

Travel
Travel
Travel
Travel

Meal
No Meal
Total
% No Meal

195288 106010
32828
9385
228116 115395
14.4
8.1

39396
12847
52243
24.6

33994
7796
41790
18.7

15888
2800
18688
15.0

No
No
No
No

Waiver
Waiver
Waiver
Waiver

Total
Total
Total
Total

Meal
No Meal
Total
% No Meal

625144 407285 92963 83592

75317 17006 32806 21098
700461 424291 125769 104690
10.8
4.0
26.1
20.2

41304
4407
45711
9.6

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS

Document 406

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 34 of 34

Appendix 6

Short Meal Breaks

=================
Restricted to shifts longer than minimum hours for a meal break
Minimum Hours for Meal Break:
California
5
hours
Illinois
7.5 hours
Washington
5
hours
Oregon
6
hours
Missed means no meal break taken
< Min means meal break taken, but too short
Full
means meal break taken, proper length

State
----CA
IL
WA
OR
Total

--------------------------- --------Total Missed < Min

Full
% < Min
------ ------ ------ ------ --------424291 17006 11816 395469
2.8
125769 32806
218 92745
0.2
104690 21098
3531 80061
3.4
45711
4407
3818 37486
8.4
700461 75317 19383 605761
2.8

Page 1