Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A risk management technique that mixes a wide variety of investments within a portfolio. The rationale behind this technique contends that a portfolio of different kinds of investments will, on average, yield higher returns and pose a lower risk than any individual investment found within the portfolio. Diversification strives to smooth out unsystematic risk events in a portfolio so that the positive performance of some investments will neutralize the negative performance of others. Therefore, the benefits of diversification will hold only if the securities in the portfolio are not perfectly correlated.
Hedging relies on negative correlation among assets, or shorting assets with positive correlation. It is important to remember that diversification only works because investment in each individual asset is reduced. If someone starts with $10,000 in one stock and then puts $10,000 in another stock, they would have more risk, not less. Diversification would require the sale of $5,000 of the first stock to be put into the second. There would then be less risk. Hedging, by contrast, reduces risk without selling any of the original position. The risk reduction from diversification does not mean anyone else has to take more risk. If person A owns $10,000 of one stock and person B owns $10,000 of another, both A and B will reduce their risk if they exchange $5,000 of the two stocks, so each now has a more diversified portfolio. Portfolio diversification is the means by which investors minimize or eliminate their exposure to company-specific risk, minimize or reduce systematic risk and moderate the short-term effects of individual asset class performance on portfolio value. In a wellconceived portfolio, this can be accomplished at a minimal cost in terms of expected return. Such a portfolio would be considered to be a well-diversified. Although the concepts relevant to portfolio diversification are customarily explained with respect to the stock markets, the same underlying principals apply to all types of investments. For example, corporate bonds have specific risk that can be diversified away in the same manner as that of stocks.
Maximum diversification
Given the advantages of diversification, many experts recommend maximum diversification, also known as buying the market portfolio. Unfortunately, identifying that portfolio is not straightforward. The earliest definition comes from the capital asset pricing model which argues the maximum diversification comes from buying a pro rata share of all available assets. This is the idea underlying index funds. One objection to that is it means avoiding investments like futures that exist in zero net supply. Another is that the portfolio is determined by what securities come to market, rather than underlying economic value. Finally, buying pro rata shares means that the portfolio overweights any assets that are overvalued, and underweights any assets that are undervalued. This line of argument leads to portfolios that are weighted according to some definition of economic footprint, such as total underlying assets or annual cash flow. Risk parity is an alternative idea. This weights assets in inverse proportion to risk, so the portfolio has equal risk in all asset classes. This is justified both on theoretical grounds, and with the pragmatic argument that future risk is much easier to forecast than either future market value or future economic footprint.
A Well-Diversified Portfolio
I know I've left the definition of a well-diversified portfolio a bit hazy. But the definition is highly dependent upon factors that are unique to each investor. Only when those factors are defined can the term be clearly defined. Those factors include: risk tolerance, targeted terminal wealth, investment horizon (planned holding period) and the universe an individual is willing to accept as the pool from which they will select their assets. As I stated above, a well-diversified portfolio should be diversified within asset classes to the degree at which specific risk has virtually been eliminated, and diversification across asset classes should be such that the residual risk of the portfolio is consistent with the investors risk tolerance. The residual risk of a portfolio will diminish as asset classes are added to the investment universe, but there is a point of diminishing returns and there is a finite number of asset classes, which implies that there is a point beyond which no further reduction of residual risk can be achieved. A portfolio would be fully diversified at this point. Well-conceived portfolio diversification will result in the construction a well-diversified portfolio that will serve you well in achieving your long-term investment goals. And selecting an investment universe that is sufficiently broad to ensure that the highest level of diversification consistent with your risk tolerance can be achieved is the single most important step in constructing your portfolio.
PRESENTATION
ON
security analysis and portfolio management
Topic: DIVERSIFICATION