Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
With modern slim cut trousers, a moderate amount of ironwork is unavoidable, especially on clients with prominent calves. Overview of Ironwork:
The topsides with a modern hem width of 48-50cm require moderate stretching of the leg and front seams beneath the knee. The topside is moderately stretched along the inseam bit by bit from top to bottom:
Resized to 99% (was 1250 x 523) - Click image to enlarge
The fork must be moderately shrunk (or held short) in order to ensure a clean adjoining of the right and left panels. The front corner of the waistband area should be moderately shrunk (Abb 470). Alternatively, as the waistband is put on, the topside can be sewn short in the shown area. The fork of left and right is reinforced with lining (Abb 469). It is recommended that the lining here be doubled over on the bias to sit backwards on the angle of the inseam, before the ironwork commences. This avoids having to trim the rear corner of the lining, which tends to stand out - particularly with thin materials.
The pleats must be correctly basted on in order for the finished trousers to have the correct fall:
The trousers must be correctly basted so that the central and the smaller pleats lay smoothly - preferably with a machine.
Abb. 473: Diagonal ironwork at the calf and moderate shrinking at the inseam
The iron is moved diagonally to the highest point of the calf, and the width falling onto the side seam is shrunk in. Abb 474: Moderate ironwork at the knee level at the leg-seam
Resized to 99% (was 1250 x 625) - Click image to enlarge
The inseam is stretched moderately at the knee Abb. 475: Diagonal ironwork at the calf and moderate shrinking at the side-seam
The calf is stretched from the inseam inwards with a diagonal movement and the excess width shrunk in Abb. 476: The round of hip at the underside is moderately shrunk short
Abb. 477: The fork is cut so that there is a bit of extra ease for comfort
The underside is normally cut so that the inseam at the fork is 1-2cm wider than the side seam. This ease must be brought to the place where it is really needed - the deepest round of the seat. Abb. 478: Moderate stretching of the top of the inseam in a diagonal direction
Abb 479: Forceful stretching with a diagonal movement of the iron in a backwards direction of the seat seam
Abb 480: Lay the trousers along the underside panel and repeat the ironwork with the same diagonal movement
Abb 481: The arrows indicate the form taken after successful ironwork on the underside
There is moderate length at knee height in the leg and side seams resulting a hollowing just below the knee. The is more or less pronounced fullness at the calf level. There is sufficient fullness at hips and seat. Abb 482: The desired overall shape and ease for added comfort in the seat seam
Resized to 99% (was 1250 x 603) - Click image to enlarge Gustav Mahler (1860-1911): "Tradition ist die Weitergabe des Feuers und nicht die Anbetung der Asche." "Tradition is about passing on the flame, and not the worshipping of ashes" Posted 06 September 2009 - 04:18 PM
The overview of the overall schema for the ironwork of trousers from die Zuschneidenkunst, published by the now defunct journal Der Schneidermeister in 1927:
e = shrink d = stretch
There are some subtle differences but overall it is very similar to the Rundschau method shown above. The following enormous essay on the correct technique for trouser ironwork comes from die Zuschneidekunst, 1938 published by der Schneidermeister.
Abb 550: On narrow cut trousers there forms at k, a large gap between top and undersides at the knee. With a moderately wide cut of trousers in Abb 551 this gap is narrower than before:
With very wide trousers as in Abb 552 hardly any gap is present:
If follows that the narrower the trouser is cut the more ironwork will be required to get the seams completely straight. The hollow at knee and roundness of calf are extremely pronounced on narrow cut trousers. The undersides must therefore be very strongly stretched or shrunk to get the seams straight in order that they should effortlessly fit together. The hollow of foot must also be attained through vigorous ironwork on the topsides. With the moderately wide form, the shape of the seams is already fairly well balanced, so less the ironwork need not be as vigorous. With the very wide form, the seams are already almost straight so very little ironwork need be conducted.
Additionally (provided there are no pleats), the topsides can be shrunk in from the letter g to the middle of the upper thigh at S1, or else the underside can be sewn long while making up - something particularly important in subjects with well developed upper thighs. On wide trousers or trousers cut with pleats this is no longer necessary, as there is already room enough there. If you were to shrink the topsides (or sew the underside long) on wide trousers it makes them too close and uncomfortable to move in at the knee. The shortness at the knee of the undersides will interfere with the forward stride of the leg with every step. With wide trousers the upper thighs are made up quite
plain. The exception is with a subject of erect or stooping stance, as we will explain later.
Abb 554: with moderately wide trousers, moderately vigorous ironwork will achieve an even run in the seams of topside and underside.
Abb 555: With very wide trousers, little ironwork is required to get the seams straight. Compare Abb 553-555, where the letter k shows the hollow of knee. You can also see that narrow cut trousers need a lot more ironwork to achieve a greater hollow of knee. Even the hollow of foot is least pronounced in the very wide form of trouser, to the point that it hardly exists any longer and the seams fall almost straight.
Abb 556 shows an example with narrow cut trousers, where there is a pronounced hollow at v and k. This hollow must be evened out through ironwork. After being worked up, the topside must have the same run as that given by the cut to the underside (although this does not relate to the roundedness of the calf). A comparison of Abb 556, 557 and 558 shows how the narrow trousers in Abb 556 have a more pronounced hollow from v to k than on the medium wide trousers in Abb 557:
This means that less vigorous ironwork is required for the medium wide trousers In Ab b 558 you can see that there is very little hollow there in the very wide trousers
The seam must be pulled forcefully, with a tug that is evening widely distributed, and so that it is directly on the seam. The left hand should grasp the seam widely from the seam to topside break and pull it forwards with a forceful tug. In this way the iron is slowly advanced forward. In order
to avoid a distortion of the shape, and the formation of creases it is best to try to avoid forcefully trying to achieve the final form in one foul sweep of the iron. The final form should be achieved rather with repeated after passes of the iron, before each of which the cloth is repeatedly moistened. Only once the desired flawless form has been achieved should the ironwork be allowed to progress to the next stage. The partly worked up topside must have the appearance shown in Abb 560:
The worked up seam of the topside must lie completely flat before moving on. The Second Half of the Topside Once the inner half of the topside (you can also start with outer half) has the desired form, the seam lying away from the body is worked up in likewise fashion. How the trouser seam is grasped is shown in Abb 561:
This second side of the topside is worked up to be long enough that it lies just as flat as the opposite seam in Abb 560. The Follow-Up Work Repeat ironwork on the topside is performed on each trouser leg. The trouser leg is folded down the middle so that the seams look exactly evenly. The trouser corner is pulled forwards with a forceful tug as shown in Abb 562:
This ironwork can be conducted with somewhat greater force as the seams tend to spring back a little to their original form. If the ironwork is conducted with special vigour you will attain the necessary form straight away without having to shrink the topside at the hollow near the hem.
The iron should be placed firmly on the cloth, and the trousers grasped at the knee area so that the thumb firmly holds onto a large width of cloth. With an evenly forceful pull, the thigh area is sufficiently stretched so that the sideseam becomes completely straight, and the trousers lie fully flat all the way down to the break. The breakline can also be shrunk somewhat short. You should try to achieve the final form more through stretching than through shrinking. If the underside is to be made extremely short relative to the topside, as with very erect figures, the thigh area can be so worked up that it forms a gently curved line. The topside must also be worked up to fit this line. With many trouser cutting systems, the side seam is already cut in the thigh area so that it has more length than the inseam. The inseam is thereby more hollow than side seam above the line of the knee. With these cuts the side seam should not be stretched as strongly. However, the inseam, as we will later see, must be stretched significantly more forcefully. The cuts in this book are drafted so that the side and inseams have the same amount of hollow, so that the ironwork can be conducted with equal force.
These bias runs of the iron achieve the desired length in the knee quicker and better than forceful pulling in the direction of the side seam. Once you have pulled the hollow of knee strongly towards the front, press the calf area well back and shrink the usual length in the hollow of knee right in up to the back trouser break.
The iron is so deployed so that the tip of the iron points in the direction of the hind trouser break at calf height. The iron is passed in a somewhat angular movement from knee level to the round of the calf of underside trouser break, with even tension on the cloth. When one pulls the lower corner of the cloth tautly with the left hand, and advances the iron on an angle towards the calf, the cloth is stretched in this direction, namely along the bias. The whole of the calf is pushed over to the underside trouser break without forming too much length in the side seam. If the first forceful pass in the direction of the round of calf should prove insufficient, the angled pass can be repeated, only in a shorter pass. Place the iron at the hollow of knee, grasping the trouser with the left hand in the breakline at the calf level and make one forceful angular pass from the hollow of knee to the calf. Once one has attained the necessary length in the underside break at calf level, the remaining round of the side seam is vigorously shrunk in until one has attained perfect straightness of the side seam up to the lower hollow of leg. It is advisable to perform the ironwork so forcefully that the side seam at the calf level appears somewhat hollow, for only then one can be certain that even after a slight spontaneous reversal of the ironwork, the correct straight seam line will remain. The correct final form of the side seam is shown in Abb 566:
Note the slight curving in of the side seam at the knee, and directly above the knee.
First you pull the calf area of the inseam evenly on the width of the iron strongly enough that inseam forms a straight line. The iron is pressed down firmly at the top of inseam and the cloth pulled strongly with the left hand at knee height.
If this angular pass is carried out with enough force, one can achieve the desired hollow of knee even on relatively hard cloths without having to shrink in the break line. Additionally, one can stretch the inseam above the hollow of knee so much with this angled pass that one attains a completely straight, even slightly curved in inseam.
The iron is so deployed that the tip of the iron points in the direction of the underside trouser break at the height of the calf. The cloth is pulled tautly with the left hand and advanced somewhat forwards by the edge of the seam. Biased Runs When the iron is passed on the bias towards the calf, the cloth is stretched and the whole form of the calf is forced out towards the underside trouser break, so that not too much length is formed in the side seam itself:
If the first forceful pass in the direction of the calf does not suffice, so that adequate length does not form in the break, and the side of the calf shape does not get pushed over to the break, the first angular pass can be repeated, only the pass is shorter. This is as shown in Abb 570. Place the iron on the hollow of knee and grasp the trouser in the breakline at calf height. Forcefully run the iron in a biased motion from the hollow of knee to the calf. This realises the greater ability of the cloth to stretch along the bias even with hard cloths that take to ironwork poorly, thereby winning a pronounced calf shape. This also avoids the need for any significant shrinking of the seam. Whenever too much shrinking is needed there is always the danger that it will slip back to its original form, as well as risking shine resulting from repeated work on the same spot.
Should the fork and inseam be stretched at all? Opinion over whether ironwork should be conducted at all over the upper inseam and fork is highly divided. Some claim that the inseam should be stretched strongly and the fork only a little, others argue that the fork should be stretched more vigorously whereas the inseam only a little. Both views are, in a way, correct. Differences in the way the seams have been cut demand different ways of working them up. If the side seam at the upper thigh is fairly straight, and by comparison the inseam is cut very hollow, then the underside must be very vigorously stretched. However, if the trousers have been cut straighter so that the upper part of the torso is more crooked, less ironwork is required. The same principle holds true for the stretching of the fork. The straighter the undersides are at the top of the inseam, the less ironwork is required at the fork. The width of trouser leg also plays a roll in judging the vigour of ironwork at the fork. The widest trousers should be somewhat stretched at the hollow of fork, especially if it has been placed relatively straight. Through this stretching the trousers become fitted at the hollow of leg directly under the closure of the inseam. The narrower a trouser has been cut the more vigorously it must be worked up. Through the working up of the fork, not only is a hollowing directly under the closure of the fork attained, but also a hollow that must lie in the break line. How the ironwork on the fork is carried out is shown in Abb 571:
Note how the iron is place on the fork. With narrow trousers the length that is produced through the stretching of the fork is pushed out towards the underside trouser break at the level of the seat. The break line is additionally shrunk in. By comparison, very wide trousers one should let the length remain in the fork, so that the break line remains straight. With wide trousers the stretching of the fork should not be extended too high up. Only the fork seam should be stretched at the hollow, whereas above the hollow
around the level of the seat the fork is even worked short. This shrinking needs to occur particularly when the seam has been cut with a rounded shape. Where the length of the fork should lie on moderately wide and very wide trouser is shown in Abb 554 and 555.
Abb 572: The completed ironwork with fully worked up side and inseams. The shape of the seams that needs to be attained through ironwork can be seen.
dpcoffin
Wonderfully clear, great to have such detailed pix! But what really is the point of all this shaping, beyond making a good impression when the pants are first tried on? It seems to me that a day's wearing stretches and distorts most pants considerably more, and mostly in the opposite directions. And are you supposed to take the pants back to the tailor for repressing as needed, or was this part of the skill-set of the average valet? I must say also that I've always been impressed (depressed?) with how disheveled, or at least rumpled, most everybody looks in old photos of the high-born and highly dressed, suggesting that in the heyday of this kind of impressive-sounding extra shaping and pressing finesse, it wasn't
doing much good once the garment was in use Or am I way off base? Very likely, since I've no experience of this level of work, on either side of the iron.
jefferyd
Look at diagram 477- you see that there is a hollow at the knee when the panel is folded along the crease line. If you fold the front part along the crease line you will have a similar but less pronounced hollow. We know that these seams will be joined and pressed into a fairly straight line. If you imagine straightening out the seam of the back panel to meet the front, you create excess length in the back thigh (a little ripple). To deal with this, some of that excess length is shrunk out (which, you are right, will eventually need repressing after having been worn) but the hollow seam is stretched out so that it will become straight WITHOUT adding too much length to the back thigh, as in figure 987. In fact, if you think about it, a crease line is normally straight unless it is manipulated so the crease line could not have the shape it does in figure 987, nor could the seam be straight but the pant still flat, without this type of manipulation. It's all in keeping with the stretching and shrinking we do on the rest of the garment (remember stretching the top sleeve into a curve from our sleeve article? I know it's a long time ago....) The rest of the manipulation is very subtle fit, but it is these subtleties that make the difference between a good trouser and a great one. It does need to be maintained with a proper pressing, but that is not outside the reach of the home valet, and one of the reasons it drives me bananas to hear about people taking a steamer to their suits! It ruins all the shaping! Ill try to illustrate the difference on my next suit.