Chapter 000X

Page 1

Why I stand for elections etc People at times ask me why stand for elections if generally the major political parties win the seats anyhow. The truth is that while have I stood in numerous elections as an INDEPENDENT candidate the cost of nominating is basically nothing versus the cost of advertising about the constitution and as such in that regard an election gives me so to say a concentrated and cheaper way to bring across to people that there is a constitution and what it is about. And, perhaps one day I might just get elected and then as one person in parliament can then take on the major political parties about what is or isnt constitutionally permissible. . Take for example how the Governments of the states have perverted the legal system that it now has a private company (in Victoria an unlisted entity Civic Compliance Victoria) issuing court orders/warrants without any proper trials, as if they were issued by a court! I view this is unconstitutional and we need to fight this! . HANSARD 8-02-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-It is as follows:No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-That is the Tasmanian amendment. Mr. ISAACS.-Yes, it has been adapted by than Tasmanian Assembly to suit our altered circumstances but I want to point out that it only became necessary to pass that 14th amendment in the United States in order to provide in the Constitution for the change that was wrought by the Civil War. The rights of citizenship for the blacks and the abolition of slavery had been won by hard fighting, and this Article 14 had to be rammed down the throats of the Southern States by the military provision which I referred, to in Sydney. This, together with the 15th article, which goes with it, had to be passed. The object of it was as I have stated, and that was recognised by the United States courts in the case of Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 United States Reports, page 303. We can understand that a Constitution should say who shall be citizens of the United States or citizens of the Commonwealth. We can also understand that having constituted a citizenship of the nation, no state should be permitted to abridge that citizenship, and take away any of the privileges or immunities pertaining to citizens. What are these privileges and immunities? That very question was dealt with in what are known as the Slaughter House cases in 1872,16 Wallace, 36, and in certain other cases. This is what the court saidThe right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution, to come to the seat of government to assert any claim he may have upon the Government, to transact any business he may have with it, to seek its protection, to share its offices, to engage in administering its functions, free access to its sea ports through which all operations of foreign commerce are conducted, also to the sub-treasuries, land offices, and courts of justice of the several states. Another privilege of a citizen of the United States is to demand the care and protection of the Federal Government for his life, liberty, and property when on the high seas, or within the jurisdiction of a foreign country; the right to peaceably assemble and petition for redress of grievances; the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus; the
Chapter 000X Page 1 INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax 001161-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com

Chapter 000X

Page 2

right to use the navigable waters of the United States, however they may penetrate the territory of the several states, and all rights secured to our citizens by treaties with foreign nations; and the right of a citizen of the United States of his own volition to become a citizen of any state of the Union by bona fide residence therein. END QUOTE HANSARD 8-02-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. KINGSTON.-What does the honorable and learned member mean by the term "due process of law"? Mr. OCONNOR.-The amendment will insure proper administration of the laws, and afford their protection to every citizen. Mr. SYMON.-That is insured already. Mr. OCONNOR.-In what way? Mr. SYMON.-Under the various state Constitutions. Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes. We are now dealing with the prohibition against the alteration of these Constitutions. We are dealing with a provision which will prevent the alteration of these Constitutions in the direction of depriving any citizen of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Because if this provision in the Constitution is carried it will not be in the power of any state to pass a law to amend its Constitution to do that. It is a declaration of liberty and freedom in our dealing with citizens of the Commonwealth. Not only can there be no harm in placing it in the Constitution, but it is also necessary for the protection of the liberty of everybody who lives within the limits of any State. Mr. SYMON.-Have we not that under-Magna Charta. Mr. OCONNOR.-There is nothing that would prevent a repeal of Magna Charta by any state if it chose to do so. Let us suppose that there were any particular class of offences, or particular class of persons who, at any time, happened to be the subjects of some wild impulse on the part of a majority of the community, and unjust laws were passedMr. SYMON.-Has anything ever happened that would Justify such a proposition? Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes, they are matters of history in these colonies which it is not necessary to refer to. Mr. SYMON.-Would it not require an amendment of the Constitution to repeal Magna Charta? Mr. OCONNOR.-What Constitution? Mr. SYMON.-This Constitution. Do you think Magna Charta would be repealed by an Act of the Federal Parliament? Mr. OCONNOR.-I do not think so, and I did not say so. But I say that, under the Constitution of the states, as we are dealing with the Constitution, a State might enact any laws which it thought fit, and even if those laws amounted to a repeal of Magna
Chapter 000X Page 2 INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax 001161-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com

Chapter 000X

Page 3

Charta they could be carried. I admit we are only dealing with a possibility, but at the same time it is a possibility which if it eventuated, as it might, would be very disastrous, and there is no reason why we should not prevent it. [start page 684] Mr. FRASER.-We might provide a safe-guard, at any rate. END QUOTE HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution. END QUOTE . Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE The Hon. A. DEAKIN: I say the great bulk of them are of that character, and am open to refutation if I am wrong, I should say that the whole of the thirty-seven subjects, but, indisputably, the great bulk of them, are subjects on which no question of state rights and state interests could arise except by the merest accident. It is, as the right hon. gentleman admitted, a grave defect in our constitution if we permit these questions to be left for all time to be determined in a purely states house, or by a state referendum, when those questions are not state questions-when they ought to be decided, not on state lines, but on national lines, and by a national referendum. END QUOTE . There are numerous other issues I canvas in elections and not uncommon other candidates who are successful then take some of the issues I canvassed as their own. . During the Broadmeadows by-election in 2011 I had many making known to me that they never knew Australia had a constitution! Also many who are naturalized also were surprised we have a constitution. From the various feedbacks I am too aware that my campaigning about the constitution so to say bears its fruits. It is sowing the seed to germinate in time. . With the Niddrie by-election it would obviously be easier for me to stand for a political party as a candidate so I do not need to spend days to collect signatures for nominations, but then again it must be a Victorian registered political party and one that is credible.
Chapter 000X Page 3 INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax 001161-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com

Chapter 000X

Page 4

. Quite frankly my wife doesnt want to have more of our monies being spend on elections, as the deposit is about $350.00 and then obviously the cost of election material to be added to this and just considering that spending at least about $140 a week on petrol also hits home over the election period. The best I can do is to provide any person who donates $50.00 or more to a election campaign with a copy of my book that was published on 6-7-2006, that in Chapter 3 contains all documents of the case I succeeded on appeals on 19 July 2006 as to why constitutionally one cannot be compelled to vote, etc. INSPECTOR-RIKATI & What is the -Australian way of life- really?

A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights

(ISBN 0-9751760-2-1 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3 Or INSPECTOR-RIKATI on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-CD) A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision ISBN 978-0-9751760-6-1 (This book also deals with the 1967 con-job referendum regarding Aboriginal rights) My website Http://www.schorel-hlavka.com contains information how to make a donation but one can also place a donation with PayPal to inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au account. But do send an email with the subject donation election, which also contains a postal address where to forward a copy of the book to. . Because the election is due in possible a few weeks it is essential that those who do support my quest about the constitution and like to make a donation do so as soon as possible. . Because of the near balance of power opportunity it would be great if I could be successful being elected as then it would enhance my position to continue ongoing the constitution and so the embedded legal principles, etc. . Considering that many spend a lot more just to fight for their rights in the courts it is so to say a mere token donation and may assist the many. . There is only so much I can do and with all the time and monies involved in research and seeking to bring across the true meaning and application of the constitution it is essential that those who can afford it provide a donation. . While people outside the State of Victoria may hold that it doesnt affect them but then they will misconceive this because where I can succeed in Victoria then this will have a flow on effect into other States. . The more people become aware of what the constitution really stands for the greater the opportunity to finally enforce its embedded legal principles. . Many candidates are hoping to be elected so they can have a cozy retirement at cost of the taxpayers whereas I am already retired (not in the head!) and so I have sincere intentions not at all related to some retirement funds. .

Chapter 000X Page 4 INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax 001161-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com

Chapter 000X

Page 5

I view that politicians are over paid and they should receive no more then at most the average weekly earnings and if they consider that is not enough well they are welcome to vacate their seats. Surely, no one can claim that paying more is going to get better politicians as most elections are so to say sewn-up by the major political parties that even a donkey could be a candidate and their intelligence, or the lack thereof, is shown. . Again, when we look how States have manipulated, unconstitutionally, the legal processes that basically you are automatically convicted by a computer, then surely this underlines that we need to take them on. . Lets get the States/Territories back to what is constitutionally permissible and not that the courts are manipulated that the ordinary man cannot afford to fight taxpayers funded lawyers to pursue JUSTICE. . Just look at what is happening in Queensland with the State constitution or better to state what purports to be the 2001 State constitution and you may get the picture that politicians are now a law onto themselves! . Again, consider the flow-on affect if in one state for example I can succeed against the unconstitutional State Land Taxes, how this then will apply to all states because a federal matters such as this would automatically apply to all States. I look forwards to the support that will be shown. . Gerrit

Chapter 000X Page 5 INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax 001161-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com