Bibliography

Aarts, B. 1992. Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Abraham, W. 1986. Unaccusatives in German. Groninger Arbeiten Zur Germanistischen Linguistik 28: 1-72. Groningen: University of Groningen Ackema, P. 1995. Syntax below Zero. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht: LOT Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntaxsematics interface. Lingua 93: 59-90. Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and Nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197. Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 2003. Middles. Ms. UiL-OTS, University of Utrecht. Alsina, A. 1992. On the Argument Structure of Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 234:517-555. Aljovi, N. 2000. Unaccusativity and Aspect in SerBoCroatian. In C. Czinglar et al. (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE 8. Leiden: SOLE. Anderson, M. 1979. Noun Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs. Babby, L. 1980. Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma. Bach, E.1982. The algebra of events. Paper presented at Sloan conference on Tense and Aspect, Ohio State University, Columbus. Bailyn, J. 2001. The Syntax of Slavic Predicate Case. In A. Striginet et al. (eds.), ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics: 1-26. Berlin: Zentrum fr Allgemeine Schprachwissenschaft. Bailyn, J. and B. Citko. 1998. The Morphology of Slavic Predicates. Proceedings of FASL VII. Michigan Slavic Publications. Baker, M. 1988a. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

294

Bibliography

Baker, M. 1988b. Theta Theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. NLLT 6: 353-389. Baker, M. 1998. Comments on the Paper by Sadock. In S. Lapointe et al. (eds.), Morphology and its relation to Phonology and Syntax: 188-212. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Baker, M., K. Johnson and I. Roberts. 1989. Passive Argument Raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219-252. Barber, E. 1975. Voice beyond the passive. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Proceedings 1: 16-24. Belletti, A. 1988. The Case of Unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34. Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi. 1988. Psych-Verbs and Theta-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291-352. Benveniste, E.1971. Active and middle voice in the verb. In M.Meek (tr.), Problems in General Linguistics: 145-151. Coral Gables, USA: University of Miami Press. Beninc, P. & L.Venelli. 1984. Italiano, veneto, friulano: fenomeni sintattici a confronto. Rivista italiana di dialettologia 8: 165-194. Bennis, H. and T. Hoekstra. 1989. Generativa Grammatica. Dordrecht: Foris. Bertinetto, P. M. and M. Squartini. 1992. In M.Bertinetto et al. (eds.), Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality, Volume 1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives: 11-26. Utrecht: Rosenberg & Sellier. Bland, S. 1988. The present progressive in discourse: Grammar versus usage revisited. TESOL Quarterly 22: 53-68. Booij, G.1992. Morphology, semantics, and argument structure. In I.M. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in Grammar: 47-64. Berlin: Mouton. Boons, J. et al. 1976. La Structure des Phrases Simples en Franais: Constructions Intransitives. Geneva: Droz. Borer, H. 2000. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: syntactic projections and the lexicon. Paper presented at the UC San Diego conference Explanations in Linguistics, December 1999. Borer, H. and Y.Grodzinsky. 1986. Syntactic vs. Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics. In H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. San Francisco: Academic Press: 175-217 Bokovi. . 1994. D-Structure, Theta-Criterion, and Movement into ThetaPositions. Linguistic Analysis 24: 264-286. Bokovi. . 2000. Second position cliticization: Syntax and/or phonology? In F. Beukema and M. den Dikken (eds.), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages: 71-119.

Bibliography

295

Bokovi. . 2001.On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Elsevier. Botwinik-Rotem, I. 2002. PP-Verbs: The Phenomenon of obligatory Ps. Ms. Tel Aviv University. Botwinik-Rotem, I. 2004. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tel Aviv. Bresnan, J. 1972. Theory of Complementation in English Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Bresnan, J. 1982a. The Passive in Lexical Theory. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations: 3-86 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Bresnan, J. 1982b. Polyadicity. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations: 149-172 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Bresnan, J. and L. Moshi. 1990. Object Asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147-185. Broadwell, G. 1986. Multiple Theta-Role Assignment. In J. McDonough & B. Plunkett, Proceedings of NELS 17, Volume I: 46-58 Brody, M. 1989. Old English Impersonals and the Theory of Grammar. UCLWPL 1: 262-294. London: University College London. Brody, M. 1993. Theta-Theory and Arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 1-23. Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Published 1980 by Garland Press, New York. Carlson, G. 1984. On the role of thematic roles in linguistic theory. Linguistics 22: 259-279. Carlson, G. 1998. Thematic roles and the Individuation of Events. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar: 35-51. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Chierchia, G. & S. McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chierchia, G. 1989. A Semantics for Unaccusatives and its Syntactic Consequences. Ms. Cornell University. Chierchia, G. 1995a. The variability of Impersonal Subjects. In E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Volume 1: 107-143. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Chierchia, G. 1995b. Individual-Level Predicates as Inherent Generics. In Carlson, G. & F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book: 176-223. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

296

Bibliography

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger. Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In K. Hale & S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 1994. Bare Phrase Structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. Chomsky, N. 1995. Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cinque, G. 1988. On Si Constructions and the Theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521-581. Cinque, G. 1995. Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clark, V. and K. Carpenter. 1989. The notion of source in language acquisition. Language 63: 1-30. Comrie, B. 1977. In Defense of Spontaneous Demotion. In P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relations: Syntax and Semantics 8: 47-58 New York: Academic Press. Condoravdi, C. 1989. The Middle: where semantics and morphology meet. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 16-30. Corver, N.1992. On deriving certain left branch extraction asymmetries: A case study in parametric syntax. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society 22: 67-84. Culicover, P.W. & W. K. Wilkins. 1984. Locality in Linguistic Theory. Orlando: Academic Press. DAllessandro, R. 2003. Agreement in Italian Impersonal SI Constructions: A Derivational Analysis. Ms. University of Stuttgart. Dahl, .1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell. Davidson, D. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decisions and Action: 81-95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. de Hoop, H. & H. De Swart. 1989. Over indefiniete objecten en de relatie tusses syntaxis en semantiek. GLOT 12: 19-35. Delfitto, D. 2002. Genericity in Language. Issues of Syntax, Logical Form and Interpretation. Alessandria (Italy): Edizioni Dell'Orso. den Dikken, M. 1992. Particles. Ph.D. dissertation. Leiden University.

Bibliography

297

den Dikken, M. 1994. Auxiliaries and Participles. NELS 24-1: 65-79. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Di Sciullo, A.M.1990. Modularity and the Mapping from the Lexicon to the Syntax. Probus 2: 257-290. Dimitriadis, A. 2003. Event Semantics for the Theta System. Ms. Utrecht: UiL OTS. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1998. Impersonal se Construction in Romance and the Passivization of Unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 399-437. Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 7. Dordrecht: Reidel. Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Structure. Language 67: 547619. Dowty, D. 1996. The Dual Analysis of Adjuncts/Complements in Categorial Grammar. Published in ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17, 2000. Edmonds, J. 1986. Les parties du discourse en grammaire gnrative. In P. Pica (ed.), Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 14-15: 93-154. Universit de Paris VII. Everaert 1990. NP Movement across Secondary Objects. In J. Mascaro and M. Nespor (eds.), Grammar in Progress: 125-136. Dordrecht: Foris. Everaert, M. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris. Everaert, M. 1994. The encoding of the lexical semantic structure of verbs: The case of Auxiliary selection in Idioms. In E.W. Weigand and R. Hundsnurscher (eds.), Lexical Structures and Language Use, Proceedings of the international conference on Lexicography and Lexical Semantics in Munster, 1994. Tubingen: Max Niemer Verlag. Fagan, S. 1988. The English Middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19, Volume 2: 181-203. Fagan, S. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fellbaum, C. & A. Zribi-Hertz. 1989. The middle construction in French and English: A comparative study of its syntax and semantics. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Fellbaum, C. 1985. Adverbs in Agentless Actives and Passives. CLS 21: 21-48. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society. Fellbaum, C. 1986. On the Middle Construction in English. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Fiengo, R. 1980. Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

298

Bibliography

Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1-90. Holt: Rinehart and Winston. Folli, R. 1999. Causative/Inchoative Alternation in Italian. In Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics 4: 33-49. Frajzyngier, Z. 1982. Indefinite Agent, Passive, and Impersonal. Lingua 58: 267290. Franks .S.1982. Is there a Pro-drop Parameter for Slavic? Chicago Linguistic Society 18: 140-154. Franks, S. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Givn, T. 1981. Typology and Functional Domains. Studies in Language 5: 163193. Givn, T.1988. Tale of two Passives in Ute. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice: 417-439. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Goldberg, A. 1992. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California. Reprinted in 1995. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Goldberg, A. 2002. Surface Generalizations: an alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. Green, G. 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Grimshaw, J. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279-326. Grimshaw, J. 1981. Form, Function, and the Language Acquisition Device. In C.L. Baker and J.J. McCarthy (eds.), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition:165-182. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Grimshaw, J. 1991. Extended Projections. Ms. Brandeis University. Grimshaw, J. 2000. Extended Projections and Locality. In P. Coopmans, M. Everaert & J. Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion: 115-133 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Gropen, J. et. al. 1992. Affectedness and Direct objects: the Role of Lexical Semantics in the Acquisition of Verb Argument Structure. Cognition 41: 153-195. Gruber, J. 1967. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Bibliography

299

Heim, I., H. Lasnik & R. May. 1991. Reciprocity and Plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 63-101. Higginbotham, J. 1985. On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547-593. Hoekstra, E. 1991. Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Rijkuniversiteit Groningen. Hoekstra, T & I. Roberts. 1993. Middle Construction in Dutch and English. In Reuland, E. & W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and Language 2: 183-220. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hoekstra, T. & R. Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication. The Linguistic Review 7: 1-79. Hoekstra, T. 1984. Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government and Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Hornstein, N & A. Weinberg. 1981. Case Theory and Preposition Stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 67-84. Hulk, A. & L. Cornips. 2000. Reflexives in Middles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. In H. Bennis, M. Everaert & E. Reuland (eds.), Interface Strategies: 207-222 Amsterdam: Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences. Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jackendoff, R. 1976. Towards Explanatory Semantic Representations. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89-150. Jackendoff, R. 1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369-411. Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press. Jaeggli, O. 1986a. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587-622. Jaeggli, O. 1986b. Arbitrary Plural Nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 43-76. Jger, G. 2001. Topic-Comment Structure and the Contrast Between Stage Level and Individual Level Predicates. Journal of Semantics 18:83-126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kayne, R. to appear. Prepositions as Probes. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Kenny, A. 1963. Action, emotion, and will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

300

Bibliography

Kerstens, J. 2002. Variable Features and Feature Geometry in Dutch. Talk given at the TSSS, UiL-OTS. Keyser, S. J. & T. Roeper. 1984. On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-415. Kirsner, R. S. 1976. On the Subject of Pseudo-Passives in Standard Dutch and the Semantics of Background Agents: 385-415 In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. Klaiman, M. 1988. Affectedness and Control: a typology of voice system. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice: 25-83. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Koizumi, M. 1995. Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Koopman, W. 1990. Word Order in Old English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Koster, J. 1984. On Binding and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 15-3: 417-459. Kratzer, A. 1981. The Notional Category of Modality. In H.J. Eikmayer & H.Rieser (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory: 1-15. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Kratzer, A. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Palletier (eds.), The Generic Book: 125-175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Krifka, M. 1995. Focus and Interpretation of Generic Sentences. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Palletier (eds.), The Generic Book: 238-264. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Krifka, M. et al. 1995. Genericity: An Introduction. In G.N. Carlson, & F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book: 1-124. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Landau, I. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Landau, I. 2001. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Ms. Ben Gurion University. Lasnik, H. 1984. Random Thoughts on Implicit Arguments. Ms. Storrs, Connecticut: University of Connecticut. Lasnik, H. 1988. Subjects and H-Criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 1-18. Lasnik, H. 1992. Case and Expletives: Notes towards a Parametric Account. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381-405. Lasnik, H. 2000. Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bibliography

301

Lepschy, A. L. and G. Lepschy. 1977. The Italian Language Today. London: Hutchinson. Lepschy, G. 1986. Towards One Si. Italian Linguistics 2: 157-160. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Levin, B. and M. Rappaport 1994. A Preliminary Analysis of Causative Verbs in English. Lingua 92: 35-77. Lyons, J.1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maling, J. 2001. Dative: the heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions and thematic roles. Lingua 111: 419-464. Maling, J. 2002. Icelandic Verbs with Dative Objects. In J. Maling et al. (eds.), Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 70: 1-59. Lund University. Manzini, R. 1983. Restructuring and Reanalysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Marantz, A. 1984. On The Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Marantz, A. 1993. Implications of Asymmetry in Double Object Constructions. In S. Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar: 113-150. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Marantz, A. 1997. No Escape from Syntax: Dont try a morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201-225. Marantz, A. 2000. Restructuring the Lexical Domain with a Single Generative Engine. Ms. MIT. Marelj, M.2002a. Middles in Romance Type Languages. Talk given at the Workshop on the Theta System. UiL OTS. Marelj, M. 2002b. Rules that govern the cooccurrences of theta-clusters in the Theta System. In Krifka, M & W. Sternefeld (eds.), Theoretical Linguistics 28: 357-382. Berlin: Mouton. Marusic, F. & R. Zaucer. to appear. A Reanalysis of the FEELLIKE DativeReflexive Construction in Slovenian. In FASL 12 (The Ottawa meeting, 2003). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. Masullo, P.J. 1992. Quirky datives in Spanish and the non-nominative subject parameter. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 16. McFadden, T. 2002. The rise of the to-dative in Middle English. MS. Penn (www.ling.upenn.edu/~tmcfadde/papers.html)

302

Bibliography

McNelly, L 1994. Adjunct predicates and the individual/stage distinction. In E. Duncan, D. Farkas & P. Spaelti (eds.), Proceedings of WCCCFL 12: 561576. Stanford: CLSI. Mitchell, B.1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Claredon Press. Mnnesland, S. 1984. The Slavonic Frequentative Habituals. In C. de Groot & H. Tommola (eds.), Aspect Bound: 53-76.Dordrecht: Foris. Montalbetti. M. 1984. After Binding. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Neeleman 1997. PP-Complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 89137. Neeleman, A. & F. Weerman. 1993. The Balance between Syntax and Morphology: Dutch Particles and Resultatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 433-475. Neeleman, A. 1994. Complex Predicates. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht: LOT. Neeleman, A. 1996. PP-Complements. OTS Working Papers. Utrecht: University of Utrecht. Neidle, C. 1988. The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Kluwer: Dordrecht. Oehrle, R. 1976. The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternations. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Papangeli, D. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Argument Realization: Greek Argument Structure and the Lexicon-Syntax Interface Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht: LOT. Parsons, T. 1985. Underlying events in the logical analysis of English. In E. LePore & B. McLaughlin (eds.), Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A study in Sub-Atomic Semantics. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 21. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Parsons, T. 2000. Underlying States and Time Travel. In J. Higginbotham et al. (eds.), Speaking of Events.81-93.New York: Oxford University Press. Partee, B. 1979. Subject and Object in Modern English. In J. Hankamer (ed.), Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series. New York: Garland. Perlmutter, D. & A. Zaenen. 1984. The Indefinite Extraposition Construction in German and Dutch. In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Perlmutter, D. and P.M. Postal. 1984. The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar: 171-216 Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pesetsky, D. 1982. Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.

Bibliography

303

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pitz, A. 1987. Middle Construction in German. Ms. University of Trondheim. Progovac. Lj. 1997. Events in Serbian. In M, Dimitrova-Vulchanova et al. (eds.), University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 31: 79-116. University of Trondheim. Progovac, Lj. 1998. Event Pronominal to. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 6: 3-29. Raposo, E. and J. Uriagareka. 1990. Long-distance Case Assignment. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 505 -538. Rappaport, G. 2000. Extraction from Nominal Phrases in Polish and the Theory of Determiners. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8-3. Ravin, Y. 1990. Lexical Semantics without Thematic Roles. Oxford: Claredon Press. Reinhart, T. 1996. Syntactic Effects of Lexical Operations: Reflexives and Unaccusatives. UiL-OTS Working Papers. Utrecht: University of Utrecht. Reinhart, T. 2000. The Theta System: Syntactic Realization of Verbal Concepts. UiL-OTS Working Papers. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Reinhart, T. 2001. Experiencing Derivations. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson & Z. Zvolensky (eds), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publication Reinhart, T. 2002. The Theta System An Overview. In W. Sternefeld (ed.), Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229-290 Berlin: Mouton. Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and logophors: an argument structure perspective. In J. Koster & E. Reuland (eds.), Long-distance Anaphora: 281321. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720. Reinhart, T. and T. Siloni. 2003. Thematic Arity Operations and Parametric Variations. Ms. University of Tel Aviv. Reinhart, T., E. Reuland and T. Siloni. 2004. The Acc Case Parameter. Ms. UiL OTS. University of Utrecht. Reuland, E. 2000. (ed.) Arguments and Case. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Rivero, M.L. 1999. Impersonal SI in Polish: A Simplex Expression Anaphor. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 199-237. Rizzi, L. 1986. Null Object in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-557. Roberts, I. 1983. Oblique Case in the History of English. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 10: Studies in Syntax: 143-159.

304

Bibliography

Roberts, I. 1985. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Rooryck, J. 1996. Prepositions and Minimalist Case Marking. In H. Thrinsson, et al. (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II: 226-256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Rooth, M. 1995. Indefinites, Adverbs of Quantification, and Focus Semantics. In G. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book: 265-299. Ross, J.R. 1970. Gapping and the Order of Constituents. In M. Bierwish & E.K. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics: 249-259. The Hague: Mouton. Ruwet. N. 1976. Problems in French Syntax. London: Longman. Sag, I.1973. On the state of progressives and statives. In C.J. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English: 83-95. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Saito, M. 1992. The additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory. Ms. University of Connecticut. Schoorlemmer, M. 1991. Dative Subject and Modality in Russian. Ms. University of Utrecht. Shen, Y. 1985. The Structure of Action in Short Narrative Text. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Tel Aviv University. Siewierska, A. 1988. The Passive in Slavic. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice: 243-289. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Siewierska, A.1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm. Sigursson, H.A. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lund. Reprinted in 1992. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. Siloni, T. 2001. Reciprocal Verbs. In Yehuda Falk (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 17. Siloni, T. 2002. Reciprocal Verbs. Talk given at the Anaphora Typology Workshop on Reciprocals, UiL OTS. Siloni, T. 2003. Active Lexicon. In Krifka, M & W. Sternefeld (eds.), Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383-400. Berlin: Mouton. Smith, H. 1994. Dative Sickness in Germanic. In J. Maling (ed.), Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 675-736. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Smyth, H. 1974. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sobin, N.J. 1985. Case Assignment in Ukrainian Morphological Passive Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 16-4: 649-662.

Bibliography

305

Steinbach, M. 1998. Middles in German. Ph.D. dissertation. Berlin: Humboldt University. Stjepanovi, S. 2001. Clitic Climbing without Climbing out of Seemingly Finite Clauses and Implications for Restructuring. Ms. Kanda University of International Studies. Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Stroik, T. 1993. Middles and Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 127-137. Stroik, T. 1999. Middles and Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 30:119-131. Takahashi, D. 1992. Improper movements and chain formation. Ms. University of Connecticut. Tremblay, M. & O. Kabbaj. 1990. The internal structure of PPs in Amharic: On postpositions and prepositional case affixes. Current Approaches to African Linguistics 7: 167-178. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Tsimpli, I. 1989. On the Properties of the Passive Affix in Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 235-260. University College London: London. Uriagareka, H. 2000. Rhyme & Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. van Hout, A. 1996. Event Semantics of Verbal Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and Its Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tilburg. van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Ph. D. dissertation. Dordrecht: Foris. van Valin, R.D. 1990. Semantic Parameters and Split Intransitivity. Language 66: 221-260 Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Vendler, Z. 1984. Adverbs of Action. CLS: 297-307. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society: 297-307 Verkuyl, H. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Wagner, F. 1977. Untersuchungen zu Reflexivkonstruktionen im Deutschen. Frankfurt/M. Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In: A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent(eds.). Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change: 427-459. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Williams, E. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203 -238 Williams, E. 1981. Argument Structure and Morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81-114.

306

Bibliography

Williams, E. 1985. PRO and Subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 297-315. Williams, E. 1995. Theta-Theory. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameter in Syntactic Theory: 99-124. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Zaenen, A. 1993. Unaccusativity in Dutch. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.), Integrating Syntax and Lexical Semantics. In Semantics and the Lexicon: 129-161. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Zlati, L. 1997. The Structure of Serbian Noun Phrase. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin. Zribi-Hertz, A. 1982. The Middle-Se Construction in French and Its Status in the Triad Middle Voice-Passive-Reflexive. Linguisticae Investigationes 6: 354401. Zubizarreta, M.-L.1982. On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Zubizarreta, M. L. 1985. The Relation between Morphophonology and Morphosyntax: The Case of Romance Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 247289. Zubizarreta, M L. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Zwart, J.W. 1998. Nonargument Middles in Dutch. In Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 42: 109-128