Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Page 1 of 23
1. INTRODUCTION
The main structure of a topside consists of either an integrated deck or a module support frame and modules. Commonly tubular lattice frames are present, however a significant amount of rolled and built up sections are also used. This lecture refers to the design of tubular joints. These are used extensively offshore, particularly for jacket structures. Connection of I-shape sections or boxed beams whether rolled or built up, are basically similar to those used for onshore structures. Refer to the corresponding lectures for appropriate design guidance. Two main calculations need to be performed in order to adequately design a tubular joint. These are: 1. Static strength considerations 2. Fatigue behaviour considerations
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 2 of 23
The question of fatigue behaviour always has to be addressed, even where simple assessment of fatigue behaviour shows this will not be a problem. The joint designer must therefore always be "fatigue minded".
2. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are universally acknowledged [1]: (refer to Figure 1 for clarification):
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 3 of 23
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 4 of 23
The CHORD is the main member, receiving the other components. It is necessarily a through member. The other tubulars are welded to it, without piercing through the chord at the intersection. Other tubulars belonging to the joint assembly may be as large as the chord, but they can never be larger. The CAN is the section of the chord reinforced with an increased wall thickness, or stiffeners. The BRACES are the structural members which are welded to the chord. They physically terminate on the chord skin. The STUB is the extremity of the brace, locally reinforced with an increased wall thickness. Different positions have to be identified along the brace - chord intersection line: CROWN position is located where the brace to chord intersection crosses the plane containing the brace and chord. SADDLE position is located where the brace to chord intersection crosses the plane perpendicular to the plane containing the brace and chord, which also contains the brace axis.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 5 of 23
Relative gap
3. CLASSIFICATION
Load paths within a joint are very different, according to the joint geometry. The following classification is used, see Figure 2.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 6 of 23
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 7 of 23
3.2 X Joints
X joints include two coaxial braces on either side of the chord. Axial forces are balanced in the braces, which in an ideal X joint have the same diameter and thickness. In fact, other considerations such as brace length, which can be very different on each side of the chord, may lead to two slightly different braces. Angles may be slightly different as well. The important point to note is the balance of forces in the braces. If the axial force in one brace is far higher than the one in the other brace, the joint may be classified as a Y (or a T) joint rather than an X joint.
3.4 KT Joints
These joints include three braces. The load pattern for these joints is more complex. Ideally axial forces should be balanced within the braces, i.e. net force into chord member is low.
3.5 Limitations
For a joint to be able to be fabricated and to be effective, the geometrical ratios given in Section 2.2 have limitations. Table 3.1 shows these limits and their typical ranges. Parameter Typical range Limitations min 0,4 - 0,8 0,2 max 1
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 8 of 23
12 - 20
10
30
0,3 - 0,7
0,2
1 (2)
40 - 90
30 (3)
90 (1)
(2) Brace shall be less or equal to chord thickness (see punching shear) (3) Angle limitation to get a correct workmanship of welds. Table 3.1 Geometrical Limits and Typical Ranges
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 9 of 23
The theoretical gap is the shortest distance between the outer surfaces of two braces, measured on the line where they cross the chord outer surface. The real gap is the one measured at the corresponding location, between actual weld toes. A brace OVERLAPS another brace when one brace is welded to the other brace. The overlapping brace is always the thinner brace. The overlapped brace is always completely welded to the chord.
4.2 Limitations
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 10 of 23
The minimum gap allowed is 50mm. This limitation is set to avoid two welds clashing. This is important because the gap is a highly stressed zone.
5. JOINT ARRANGEMENT
As a rule, welds in a joint have to be kept away from zones of high stress concentration. The following practice, see Figure 4, should be followed: 1. The chord circumferential welds are to be located at either 300mm or a quarter of the chord diameter, whichever is the greater, from the nearest point of a brace-chord connection. 2. The brace circumferential welds are to be located at either 600mm or a brace diameter, whichever is the greatest, from the nearest point of the brace-chord connection. 3. The actual gap shall not be less than 50mm. To achieve this, most designers use a 70 or 75mm theoretical gap. 4. Eccentricity and offset are to be kept within a quarter of the chord diameter. When higher values can not be avoided, secondary moments have to be introduced in the structural analysis by introducing extra nodes. 5. Thickness transitions are smoothed to a 1 in 4 slope, by tapering the thicker wall.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 11 of 23
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 12 of 23
6. STATIC STRENGTH
6.1 Loads taken into account
The loads considered in a joint static strength design are the axial force, the in-plane bending moment and the out-of-plane bending moment for each brace. The other components (transverse shear and brace torsion moment) are usually neglected since unlike the preceding loads, these loads do not induce bending in the chord wall. Nevertheless, their presence must never be forgotten and in some specific cases, their effects must be assessed. The axial load, inplane and out-of-plane bending moments are normally the dimensioning criterion for tubular joints.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 13 of 23
6.2.2 Allowable punching shear Allowable punching shear values in the chord wall are determined from test results carried out on full scale or on reduced scale models. Tests are performed on experimental rigs such as the one shown in Figure 6. They are performed for a single load-case (axial force, in-plane bending, or out-of-plane bending).
The ultimate static strength obtained through these tests can then be expressed in terms of punching shear, as defined above. Statistical treatment of results allow formulae to be defined for the allowable punching shear stress. 6.2.3 The API method Several offshore design regulations are based on the punching shear concept [1,2]. The following method is presented in API RP2A [2]: A. Principle This method applies to a single brace without overlap, for a non-stiffened joint. When the joint includes several braces, each brace connection is checked independently. Punching shear for each load component (axial force, in-plane bending, and out of plane bending)
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 14 of 23
is calculated and compared to the allowable punching shear stress for the appropriate load and geometry. Interaction formulae are given for combined loading, combining the three punching shear ratio calculated for each component. B. Allowable punching shear stress The allowable punching shear stress for each load component is:
Vpa = Qq Qf where: Fyc is the yield strength of the chord member Qq is to account for the effects of type of loading and geometry, see Table 6.1. Qf is a factor to account for the nominal longitudinal stress in the chord
Qf = 1 - fAX, fIPB, fOPB are the nominal axial, in-plane bending and out of plane bending stresses in the chord Value for and Qq are given in Table 6.1
Load component Stress in brace Acting punching shear K joints Axial load fax Vpx = fax sin In-plane bending fby Vp = fby sin Out of plane bending fbz Vp = fbz sin
T & Y Joints
w/o diaphragm X
Tension
Compression
w diaphragm
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 15 of 23
0,030
0,045
0,021
Table 6.1 Values of Qq for allowable punching shear stress from APIRP2A
Qg = 1,8 - 0,1
for 20
C. Loading Combination For combined loadings involving more than one load component, the following equations shall be satisfied:
where: IPB refers to in-plane bending component OPB refers to out-of-plane bending component AX refers to axial force component and
ax
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 16 of 23
overlapping section, without that part of the load transferring through the chord. The static strength of an overlapping joint is higher than a similar joint without an overlap. API RP2A, [2] allows the static shear strength of the overlapping weld section to be added to the punching shear capacity of the brace-chord connection, see Figure 7.
The allowable axial load component perpendicular to the chord, P (in Newtons) should be taken to be: P = (vpa T l1) + (2vwa tw l2) where: vpa is the allowable punching shear stress (MPa) for axial stress. l1 is the circumference for that portion of the brace which contacts the chord (mm), see Figure 7. vwa is the allowable shear stress for weld between braces (MPa). tw is the lesser of the weld throat thickness or the thickness t of the inner brace (mm). l2 is the projected chord length (one side) of the overlapping weld, measured perpendicular to the chord (mm), see Figure 7.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 17 of 23
consists of ring stiffening inside the chord. Some joints may require more complex stiffening. This is the case for large diameter chords which would otherwise require an un-economic chord wall thickness. There are very many different stiffening solutions for a large diameter chord. Therefore there are no parametric formulae available for these designs. Specific analyses must therefore be carried out for an accurate solution. This may involve finite element analysis. 6.4.2 Ring Stiffening Ring stiffening consists of ring plates welded in the chord can prior to welding the braces to it. The punching shear capacity of the chord still may be taken into account when calculating the forces acting on the stiffeners. Ring stiffeners can be justified through parametric formulae available in various publications, the best known being published by Roark [3].
7. STRESS CONCENTRATION
As in any mechanical body presenting discontinuities, stresses are not uniform along the connecting surface of a brace and chord. Figure 8 shows an example of the stress distribution in a joint with local discontinuities at and in the vicinity of the brace chord intersection.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 18 of 23
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 19 of 23
A large number of parametric formulae have been published [4]. Sections 7.3.1 to 7.3.3 give, as an example, the most commonly used and acknowledged formulae. In using any set of formulae, care should be taken in classifying the situation and ascertaining any limitations that apply. The only alternatives to these formulae are to perform model tests (full size or at reduced scale) or finite element analyses. No parametric formulae are presently available for stiffened joints. The only ones published to date concern non-stiffened, non overlapping joints. 7.3.1 Kuang equations for T/Y joints [4] Axial load SCFCHORD = 1,981 0,808 1,333 exp(-1,23 0,057 sin1,694 SCFBRACE = 3,751 0,55 exp(-1,35 3) 0,12 sin1,94 Out-of-plane bending SCFCHORD = 1,024 1,014 0,889 0,787 sin1,557 SCFCHORD = 0,462 1,014 0,889 (-0,619) sin1,557 SCFBRACE = 1,522 0,852 0,543 0,801 sin2,033 SCFBRACE = 0,796 0,852 0,543 (-0,281) sin2,033 In-plane bending SCFCHORD = 0,702 0,60 0,86 (-0,04) sin0,57 SCFBRACE = 1,301 0,23 0,38 (-0,38) sin0,21 7.3.2 Kuang equations for K joints [4] Balanced axial load SCFCHORD = 1,506 0,666 1,104 (-0,059) (g/D)0,067 sin1,521 SCFBRACE = 0,92 0,157 0,56 (-0,441) (g/D)0,058 Exp(1,448 sin ) 0,3 0,55 0,55 0,75 0,3 0,55 0,55 0,75
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 20 of 23
In-plane bending (bending moment applied to one brace only) SCFCHORD = 1,822 0,38 0,94 0,06 sin0,9 SCFBRACE = 2,827 0,35 -0,35 sin0,5 7.3.3 Kuang equations for KT joints [4] Balanced axial load Outer braces only loaded SCFCHORD = 1,83 0,54 1,068 0,12 sin SCFBRACE = 6,06 0,1 0,68 -0,36 {(g1+g2)/D}0,126 sin0,5 SCFBRACE = 13,8 0,1 0,68 -0,36 {(g1+g2)/D}0,126 sin2,88 0 < 90 0 < 45 45 90
SCFBRACE = 4,89 0,123 0,672 -0,396 {(g1+g2)/D}0,159 sin2,267 In-plane bending - as for K joint Validity range The above equation for T/Y, K and KT joints are generally valid for joint parameters within the following limits: 8,333 33,3 0,20 0,8 0,3 0,8 unless stated otherwise 6,667 40 unless stated otherwise 0 90 unless stated otherwise.
8. FATIGUE ANALYSIS
A fatigue analysis of a joint consists of the following steps: 1. Calculation of nominal stress ranges in the brace and the chords 2. Calculation of hot-spot stress range 3. Calculation of joint fatigue lives using S-N curves for tubular members at joints.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 21 of 23
Nominal stress ranges in braces and chords are calculated by a global stress analyses. 8.1.1 Wave histogram A wave histogram has to be obtained for each direction around the platform. A simple form of a wave histogram is as follows: Wave height (metres) Average number per year 3 100 000 410 000 730 000 5 000 800 20
0-1,5 1,5-3 3-4,5 4,5-6 6-8 8-10 8.2.2 Nominal stress ranges
Nominal stress ranges can be calculated by following the steps below: 1. Wave heights are grouped in "blocks", for which just one stress range will be calculated. Different wave directions need to be considered with a minimum of three "blocks" per wave direction. 2. For each block one representative wave is chosen, whose action is supposed to represent the action of the whole block. The highest wave of the block is normally chosen. 3. Nominal stresses for each joint component are then calculated for different phase angles of the chosen wave, for one complete cycle (360). The nominal stress range for the joint component is defined as the difference between the highest and the lowest stress obtained for a full wave cycle. Four to twelve phase angles per wave are usually considered.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 22 of 23
The X and X1 curves should be used with hot spot stress ranges based on suitable stress concentration factors. The permissible number of cycles is obtained from the S-N curve by taking the hot spot stress range, and entering the graph. It should be noted that Curve X presumes welds which merge smoothly with the adjoining base metal. For weld without such profile control, the X curve is applicable.
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010
Page 23 of 23
D= where n is the number of cycles applied at a given stress range N is the number of cycles to cause failure for the given stress range (obtained from appropriate S-N curve). In general the design fatigue life of each joint and member should be at least twice the intended service life of the structure, i.e. a safety factor of 2,0. For critical elements whose sole failure would be catastrophic, use of a larger safety factor should be considered.
9. CONCLUDING SUMMARY
Terminology, geometric ratios and joint classifications are now standardised for tubular joints. The presence of gaps and overlaps significantly influence joint behaviour. Determination of static strength is generally based on the concept of punching shear, with the allowance of overlapping joints. Special analysis are required for reinforced joints. Stress concentration factors (SCF) are defined for most commonly occurring joints. Determination of fatigue strength is based on nominal stress range multiplied by appropriate SCF.
10. REFERENCES
[1] Offshore Installations: Guidance on Design, Construction and Certification. Fourth Edition, HMSO, 1990. [2] Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms, API RP2A Nineteenth Edition. [3] Young, Warren C, Roark's Formulae for Stress and Strain. Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill. [4] Stress Concentration Factors for Simple Tubular Joints, 1989, Volumes 1 to 5, Lloyds Register of Shipping-Offshore Division. Previous | Next | Contents
http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/kmk/ESDEP/master/wg15a/l0700.htm
7/28/2010