Sunteți pe pagina 1din 11

To the Marihuana Party, I am a Human Rights Defender, 14 years experience in researching, studying and interpreting all "statutory instruments"

and the conflicts with Human Rights created by them. I just received a copy of the June 16, Canadian Press report on Health Canada's new and unlawful restrictions on medical marijuana. For all those who continue to give the Canada Corporation (Registered in the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) as a Company) and their corporate entity "Health Canada", authority over them (in spite of their so-called "Constitution Act, 1867" restricting the Feds to making laws in relation to "Quarantine and the Establishment and Maintenance of Marine Hospitals"), please read the attached Challenge of Jurisdiction etc as served on the A.G.'s of "Canada" and the "Province" of British Columbia (also Registered in the S.E.C. as a Company) and the Affidavit of Non-Response directed to the A.G. of "Canada". Fact: There are no lawfully constituted true governments operating anywhere within any geographic area called a "province", but rather and only, corporate governments de facto. (legal definition of de facto = "not founded on law") Fact: Justice Canada has confirmed to me in writing that "Canada" is not comprised of any such geographic areas, but rather and only, of the 3 Territories. Fact: All of these corporate governments de facto are about to be brought down through various legal processes, including the ones involved in the above attachments, but also including an International Commercial Claim, which is currently being prepared for service If people truly desire change to the betterment of all, it is suggested that they get on page with the irrefutable truths exposed through this form of Challenge Legal Maxim ( "a set of facts which need no proof") "Jurisdiction once challenged, must be proven." Enjoy the read and the new found freedom it provides. David Butterfield - by authority of U.N. General Assembly Declaration Educator and Defender of Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

May 7, 2007.

David Butterfield, natural man

In care of: 78-10760 Guildford Drive, Surrey, British Columbia. Non-commercial.

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority By Registered Mail


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

To: Robert Douglas Nicholson, natural man and, Attorney General of Canada In Care Of: Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, 284 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0H8 and; To: Wally Opal, natural man and, Attorney General of British Columbia In Care Of: Attorney General of the Province of British Columbia P.O. Box 9065, STN PROV, Victoria, British Columbia. V8W 9E2 and;

This Challenge is made on behalf of: Kapilano (legal name: Jerry Johnson) Hereditary Chief of the Squamish Nation; Senk'lip (legal name: Alex Louie) Headman of and, Spokesman for the Kooskalwx Tribal Lands; Skookum manik (legal name: Pierre Joseph Kruger) Headman of and, Spokesman for Kooskalwx Tribal Lands; and, any response shall be delivered to David Butterfield, at the address above. Notices:
This is not a challenge of the federal governments constitutional right to levy income taxes.

Take Notice: you are hereby required to prove the lawful authority and lawful jurisdiction of
both the Federal Government of Canada and the government of the Province of British Columbia.

Further take Notice: the evidence provided herein this Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful
Authority is conclusive proof that all levels of government are merely and purely, 100% corporations and are not lawfully constituted governments, which would be capable of passing and enforcing public laws. Instead, your corporate governments de facto have created only copyright protected private corporate policies having jurisdiction only over artificial persons created by those corporate policies, referred as Statutes and only within the geographical boundaries of the respective corporation. Still further take Notice: this Challenge is made by the above Headmen, Chiefs and/or Spokesmen on behalf of their people and all those who will come after and in the exercise of their natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including their Right to live under a lawful system of social order.

Even further, take Notice that you are hereby required upon your failure, neglect, or refusal
to respond appropriately to this Challenge, to immediately provide Notice to all of your Agents, giving direction that they cease and desist any further actions constituting malicious vexation by legal process. Said Notice must also give direction to restrict enforcement of all your de facto corporate governments policies (Statutes), only to natural men/women who voluntarily and with knowledge, act in capacity of an artificial person within and to the service of the corporate governments de facto. If any of you are somehow capable of providing valid evidential documentation contrary to the facts contained herein, you must do so within 20 days of your receipt of this Challenge if you wish to avoid provision of your tacit agreement and subjection to Estoppel by Conduct. (two)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page two


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Effect of Disregard of this Challenge:


Should you fail, neglect, or refuse to respond appropriately to this Challenge, you will tacitly agree with all facts contained herein. The application of the Nuremberg Principles will cause you, the man or woman, in your private capacity, to answer to an International Human Rights Tribunal on charges including: aiding the operation of a form of slavery. Confirmation of the gross Human Rights violations, which all of you perpetrate against all people who live without knowledge, comes from the facts presented herein. Know this: Whether or not you are able or willing to respond to this Challenge, this Great Deception carried out with genocidal intent, will be completely exposed to the Human Rights Tribunal and the world. Tacit Agreement and Estoppel in pais (Estoppel by conduct) Definitions of Estoppel and Estoppel in pais Barrons Canadian Law Dictionary defines the term Estoppel as follows: ESTOPPEL Originally known as preclusion; a bar; an impairment whereby a party is precluded in any subsequent proceeding from alleging or proving that certain facts are otherwise than they were originally made to appear. The Peoples Bank of Halifax v. Richard A. Estey (1904), 34 S.C.R. 429. Estoppel has been described as a rule of evidence, and consequently an action cannot be found on it. Low v Bouverie, [1891] 3 Ch. 82 (C.A.). However, the whole concept is more precisely viewed as a substantive rule of law; a principle of justice and equity. Canada and Dominion Sugar Co. Ltd. v Canadian National West Indies Steamships Ltd. [1947] A.C. 46 at 56 (P.C.). There are four kinds of estoppel: estoppel by matter of record, estoppel by deed, estoppel in pais and promissory estoppel. and, Estoppel in pais is defined as follows: Estoppel in pais Also known as ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT. The usual meaning of the word estoppel. When one person by his conduct leads another to believe that certain facts are true and these are acted upon, then in any subsequent proceedings this person cannot deny the truth of such facts. Capital Trust Corporation Ltd. v Gordon,l [1945] O.R. 277 at 286 (Ont.S.C.). Violation and Denial of Natural Rights We make this Challenge from positions of honor, without intention of being confrontational and/or disrespectful and in the exercise of our natural rights to: live under a lawful system of social order; personal safety and freedom; ones good name; the unmolested pursuit of ones trade or occupation; freedom from malicious vexation by legal process and; to ones own property. These natural rights have been confirmed as available to us against all the world, by your Court of Appeal of the Province of British Columbia in the Human Rights case of Rex v Sang Chong and also through numerous international instruments which have been ratified by Canada. Yet, these Rights continue to be violated by you and various Agents acting on behalf of the corporate governments de facto. (three)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page three


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

These violations continue in spite of confirmation from that Court that: Where a restraint is sought to be put upon any person in respect of the exercise of any of those natural rights, I think it is the duty of the Court to assume that the legislature did not intend to interfere with them, unless clear and unequivocal words have been used. If intent to place such a restraint does exist and is stated in clear and unequivocal words in any law whether or not referred herein and, which you can prove to be a public law, please direct us to that public law and those clear and unequivocal words placing that restraint upon us, as naturally created men and women who are not in the service of any government de facto. Otherwise, and to avoid answering to legal actions in your private capacities, it is your lawful duty and responsibility to end all such violations immediately. You must still provide appropriate response to this Challenge of your jurisdiction and lawful authority, dissolve all claims against us and remove any attachments unlawfully applied to our property (ones own property). This is including any property you have embezzled from us through fraudulently created Treaties, creation of corporations called Reserves, or by recording it in your Registries in the name of an artificial person/legal fiction, the name of which is presented entirely in upper-case lettering and which, is an incorporated inhabitant that lives only on your books and records internally, also referred to as the Taxpayer, which you created through commission of the offence of identity theft in using information extorted from our parents, under threat of punishment, in a Statement of Birth. It is your free will decision to either act honorably, or remain complicit in your assault on the Human Rights of the people. This Challenge is addressed to you as natural men and women. The artificial person in the capacity of which you act from time to time, is not capable of committing any crime against anyone, or of being answer-able to or for anything. Each of you must prove possession of lawful authority and jurisdiction to make, and/or enforce laws and/or by-laws affecting naturally created men/women who are not acting in capacity of an artificial person as created by any Statute of the corporate governments de facto, currently ruling and living through the exploitation of all people. Therefore, you must prove yourselves Agents of a lawfully constituted government, either for the province of British Columbia (as opposed to the de facto corporate government of the Province of British Columbia) and of a lawfully constituted Federal Government for a lawfully constituted country called Canada, and which is legally including the province of British Columbia. You must also prove the Statute of Westminster did not suspend the British North America Act, 1867, did not render the Central Legislature and the Office of the Governor General redundant and did not grant sovereignty and independence to the geographic areas commonly called, provinces. If you are not already in possession of evidence, which would prove your lawful authority to do what you do, either you are ignorant and therefore incompetent, or you act with intent to deny and violate natural Human Rights. Either way, you commit a form of fraud, now you must prove which it is. Should you fail, neglect or refuse to respond appropriately to this Challenge by disproving the facts contained herein and proving your possession of lawful authority; you will immediately concede all jurisdiction and lawful authority over the geographic area commonly called British Columbia, to the rightful owners of this land; remove any form of attachments from all of our property; apologize for your ignorance of your own laws and the Human Rights violations suffered at your hands. Whatever you do, you will still answer to an internationally recognized Human Rights Tribunal. At the hearing, estoppel by conduct shall apply as you will have given the appearance that these facts are true. He who is silent is understood to agree. (four)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Noitce of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page four


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Additional Facts The de facto government of the Province of British Columbia is merely a corporation Registered as such in the United States Security Exchange Commission and, so is the corporation Canada. A corporation is defined by the corporate Interpretation Act of British Columbia, as follows: corporation means an incorporated association, company, society, municipality or other incorporated body, where and however incorporated, and includes a corporation sole other than Her Majesty or the Lieutenant Governor; Notice: this definition makes no distinction between your government and
any other incorporated company.

Barrons Canadian Law Dictionary defines corporation as follows: CORPORATION An association of shareholders created under law and regarded as an artificial person by the courts and thus treated like any other independent person with its rights and liabilities appropriate to itself, andthe motives of those who took part in the promotion of the company are absolutely irrelevant in discussing what those rights and liabilities are. Salomon v Salomon & Co., [1897] A.C. 22 at 30 (H.L.), A corporation has the capacity of taking, holding and conveying property, suing and being sued, and exercising such other powers as may be conferred on it by law, just as a natural person. Clearly the term natural person is also a legal fiction and cannot apply to naturally created men and woman who are not acting as a legal fiction, as we have human rights, which are impossible for a corporation to possess. Note that a corporations rights and liabilities are merely appropriate to itself. Further, the statement conferred on it by law, is of course relating to non-existent public law, not copyright protected private corporate law such as those currently operating. All laws currently operating are copyright protected private opinions or ideas of the corporate governments de facto. More importantly, there is no distinction made in your own definition of corporation, between a business like Wal-Mart and your own de facto government. Nothing saying that a corporate government de facto has lawful authority over natural men and women acting in that capacity while working for their own benefit as inhabitants of a geographic area outside of its own corporate offices. Your government has no more lawful authority over the masses, than does Wal-Mart. We do not work for either corporation and we will not enter such fraudulent contracts with you!

Additional Requirements
Notwithstanding its invalidity as a constitution and its pure corporate status, you must also prove where your corporate Constitution Act, 1867 (British North America Act, 1867) provides/allows for: (a) Any government to lawfully operate 100% as a corporation; (b) Any government to lawfully own anything; (c) Any government to lawfully operate as a business: i.e. for-profit venders; landlords owning and renting out revenue properties, especially those situated on dry land made from organic matter. (five)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page five


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Additional Facts Your corporate courts have ruled that governments cannot do anything that is not provided for by its Constitution. Thus, all you do against natural men and women is without lawful authority and with the purpose to systematically enslave them, this constitutes premeditated crimes against humanity. Further, the fraudulent scheme you operate renders all corporations de facto, including Banks and all other financial institutions. Confirmed by Barrons Canadian Law Dictionary definition of de facto, all corporations have inadvertently failed to comply with all the provisions of the laws relating to the creation of a corporation, and are therefore, de factonot founded on law. No corporation is created under public law, but only by copyright protected private corporate law (corporate policy). The only degree to which any mans trade is actually incorporated, is by incorporating it into the de facto corporate governments corporate structure, thereby creating a Franchise, as evidenced by the Income Tax and Canada Pension Plan Acts naming of a corporation director as an officer holding office in government. Franchise Fees payable to the corporate governments de facto come in form of taxes collected from all customers and employees of the company defrauded by incorporating. Documents Provided with this Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority: 1. David Butterfields Request for Remedial Action to U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (including addendums as identified in the index). The documents provided and contained in this Challenge are irrefutable and conclusive evidence that: a) the word includes is restrictive and synonymous with the word comprise, keeping with the Legal Maxim, the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another; (maxim-a set of facts which need no proof) b) this province (geographic area), is a sovereign/independent territory which has remained in a legal condition of anarchy since at least the Statute of Westminster, 1931; c) no lawful governments exist for this province, but rather and only a corporate government de facto of the Province (corporation) of British Columbia; d) all so-called laws are merely copyright protected private corporate policies; e) those private corporate policies confirm that the authority/jurisdiction of the corporate government de facto apply only within the geographic boundaries of that corporation, i.e. within City Hall; f) these corporate policies can only apply to those with knowledge of these facts before they voluntarily choose to be in the service of the corporate government de facto; g) each man/woman not knowingly and voluntarily in the service of that corporate realm remains his/her own authority. Any admission must accompany an expressly stated commitment to the creation of a lawful government for the province of British Columbia. Any admissions will not excuse you of your wrongdoings or your debt owed us for violating our Human Rights and stealing our property. You must compensate us for your violations of our natural rights to: live under a lawful system of social order, freedom from malicious vexation by legal process, ones good name, to ones own property and numerous violations of many other Human Rights. If your appropriate response is not received within the twenty calendar day period allowed, Estoppel by Conduct shall apply and you will thereby provide your tacit agreement with all facts stated and presented herein this Challenge.

(six)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page six


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Additional Facts We are men naturally created by nature, not person(s) as created by statute, we are inhabitants of the dry land situated in the geographic area commonly called the province of British Columbia. We are not incorporated inhabitants of a corporation called a City, Municipality, or a Province. Pursuant to definitions of land as given in your corporate laws, our dry land does not come within any such definition. Thus, the resulting necessary inference is, neither ours, nor any other dry land, legally comes within the jurisdiction/authority of any corporate government de facto. Neither can corporate governments de facto claim ownership of land which is not land as defined by your corporate laws. i.e.: land covered by water; the surface of water; sand and gravel; quarries. This will interest those being taxed on dry land, especially since they have never been the lawful owners of that dry land. As our dry land comprises all of the geographic area commonly known as the province of British Columbia and is not situated within the geographic boundaries of the corporate government of the Province of British Columbia; or the Federal Government/Government of Canada, neither of us, nor our dry land, nor any other of our property, comes within your corporate jurisdiction. In spite of this, Agents of your corporate governments de facto have unlawfully assumed jurisdiction over us and over all of our land and our property, thereby violating our natural rights, including that of ones own property. This Challenge is based upon fact that all governments are mere corporations. As properly interpreted by David Butterfield, the various documents provided herein are irrefutable proof that you are without any lawful authority or jurisdiction, either over us; our land; our private property; or any results of our labor. Because you are natural men/women first, before you act as Agents of a corporate government de facto, we give this one opportunity for you to disprove the facts stated herein and to prove your governments possession of lawful authority. It is our natural right to know the source of lawful authority, if any, under which we are living. This Challenge may cause shock, anger, fear, or even more animosity toward us, but all will certainly meet these facts with absolute disbelief, just as we did upon initial discovery. Therefore, we are allowing twenty (20) calendar days for provision of your only appropriate response. We have no desire to punish any individual involved unless they continue such activities without first establishing their lawful authority to do so. We intend only to eradicate the numerous financial/emotional burdens created by all of these unlawful conditions, which manifest as negative experiences daily for almost every individual living within the extremely wealthy, sovereign and independent territory commonly called British Columbia. We work to the creation of lawful governments, only of purpose to serve the people, as opposed to feeding off the people as out-for-profit-corporations and by subjecting them to approximately 170 taxes in each geographic area, which you call provinces. Assumptions are Always Dangerous There is no foundation in any of your corporate laws to justify any of your unlawful actions against natural men/women acting in that capacity, including your continued violation and denial of our Human Rights. Only ignorance of your laws could allow the belief that such justification exists. (seven)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page seven


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Herein you will discover as fact: the province(s) are in a legal condition of anarchy; not one so-called law has jurisdiction over individuals who are just being the natural men/women they are, inhabitants of a geographic area known outside of law as a province, or city, or municipality. These so-called laws also confirm that not one of them has jurisdiction within any geographical area known outside of law as being a province, city, or municipality. Many of your corporate Principals have already admitted to all this as being true. Emboldened and underlined first letters are intended to remind you that when such terms are written with an upper-case (capital) first letter, it indicates it is used in a corporate sense and speaks of a corporate entity. When a lower-case (small) first letter is used, it represents a geographic area. Additional Facts These documents allow you to discover that no lawfully constituted governments exist within or for any one of the provinces, only corporate governments de facto. Further, the geographic areas known on the street as provinces are not a part of Canada. Unbelievable, but this is precisely why your so-called laws(corporate policies), do not and cannot claim any jurisdiction within or over, any one of the so-called provinces, or the natural men/women inhabitants thereof. These corporate laws show their jurisdiction applies only to artificial persons/legal fictions, often having names spelled in a corporate language, entirely in upper-case, all of which were created by the corporate governments de facto after stealing and altering the identities of natural men and women. We are all victims of a massive fraud, and all of you and others involved, are aiding and abetting its perpetuation. However, your apparent dedication, along with your courage, can help to change this situation to the betterment of all. That is your free will decision to make. Keep in mind, your knowledge of these facts is evidenced by your receipt of this Challenge, without first proving your lawful authority, any business as usual behavior by you, will show your intent to continue to violate Human Rights. Further to the use of all capital letters and what it means to capitalize on something, you will learn that every individual who has worked to pay for any type of property is an unknowing victim of fraud and embezzlement. This results when any type of property, including dry land, is registered by the corporate government de facto to an all-capital letter name of an artificial person/legal fiction, which they create for profit. These entirely upper-case words are written in an internal corporate language not subject to the Rules of Grammar of English. i.e. JOHN DOE. Check the I.D you carry, this allcaps style is used to present the name on every piece of I.D. and has nothing to do with inefficient computer software. The rules of grammar of English do not provide allowance for any word to be written entirely in upper-case lettering. Such writings are those of an internal corporate language, designed for internal readership. Before attempting to interpret the laws provided herein, you should first refer to Tab D in the binder so to learn the correct usage of the word include(s), a synonym of which, is comprise. In spite of being one of the most confused words of English, it is employed in every Interpretation and/or Definitions section of every so-called law. This has deliberately caused and perpetuated the misinterpretation of all so-called laws. (eight)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page eight


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

Interpretation of some of the statutory evidence enclosed It is apparent that common sense cannot apply to the interpretation of these so-called laws. It will be easier to gain proper understanding of these laws if one reads them while emulating Alice, entering into Wonderland, where everything is either up-side-down or opposite. As well as the opposite meaning given the word land, further example of this deceptive practice is found in the Motor Vehicle Act of the Province of British Columbia where the definition of accident is: an intentional collision. Such an approach, is not only necessary to proper interpretation, but also helps you to recognize that a parallel world was created by those responsible for the existence and operation of these de facto corporate governments. This mirror image world partly intends to cause all to believe that it is they who are named on the Identifications issued to them, making them subject to those who steal their lifes energy while holding de facto (not founded on law) possession of the sovereign power. Definitions and Interpretation Quoted here are definitions of certain pertinent words, as provided in Interpretation/Definitions sections of various instruments created by the de facto corporate government of the Province of British Columbia. The meanings expose the deception/fraud constituting human rights violations. Underlines and emboldened lettering are inserted for accentuation. Local Government Act: municipality means, in relation to a regional district, a municipality in the regional district and, in the case of the Greater Vancouver Regional District, includes the City of Vancouver; Interpretation Act: municipality means, as applicable, (a) the corporation into which the residents of an area are incorporated as a municipality under the Local Government Act, the Vancouver Charter or any other Act, or (b) the geographic area of the municipal corporation; Insert: A municipality, deceptively shown with a lower-case m, is actually the corporation Municipality. Therefore, the geographic area of the municipal corporation referred to in (b), can only be the geographic area of which the corporate entitys office building(s) comprises, such as Municipal Hall, or City Hall. How could its geographic area be any greater? Can the corporate entity Wal-Mart, make corporate policies to carry its jurisdiction outside the confines of the geographic area of Wal-Marts own building/parking lot? Further, council then means, the council of the corporation called the Municipality. Local Government Act: improvement district means an improvement district, including a mountain resort improvement district, incorporated under this or any other Act; improvements - improvements is defined in the Assessment Act; local government means (a) the council of a municipality, and (b) the board of a regional district Insert: Do not forget that the council of a municipality is the council of a corporation. (nine)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page nine


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

local government offices means (a) in relation to a municipality, the municipal hall, and (b) in relation to a regional district, the offices where the regular office of the regional district officer assigned responsibility under section 198 [corporate administration] is located; From the Assessment Act: land includes (a) land covered by water, (b) quarries, and (c) sand and gravel, but does not include coal or other minerals; owner, in respect of real property, means the registered owner of an estate in fee simple, and includes, (a) if a person is a registered owner of a life estate, the tenant for life, (b) if there is an agreement for sale and purchase of real property, the registered holder of the last registered agreement of sale and purchase, and, (c) if the real property is held or occupied in the manner referred to in sections 26, 27, and 28, the holder or occupier; Insert: By the governments registering the land in the all-capital-letter name of the person (includes a corporation), which is their own creation, the Crown becomes the registered owner. The above definition refers only to real property, which is defined in the Community Charter as: real property means land with or without improvements so affixed to the land as to make them in fact and in law a part of it; Insert: So, real property is only land covered by water, etcetera and can have improvements if the manner in which they are affixed to the water, etcetera makes them a part of the water,. Insert: You will learn that the term Crown is not a reference to Elizabeth Windsor, or Her Heirs or Successors, or Her Agents, as no Monarchy possesses any lawful authority in or over, any one of the provinces. The Crown is another corporate entity related to the Rothschilds, their Central Bank of England, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Anglican Church, it is these nefarious entities, which have stolen our sovereignty and assumed authority over us all while using you to do it. Local Government Act: regional district means, as applicable, a) a regional district incorporated under this Act, or b) the geographic area of a regional district corporation referred to in paragraph (a), (ten)

Time Sensitive Material

Estoppel by Conduct Shall Apply

Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority - page ten


Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent and Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal

It is clear that all property registered with/in the corporate governments de facto is thereby embezzled from those who worked to pay for it. Just as a company owner who incorporates under corporate laws has unknowingly agreed to share ownership of his company and act as their servant/officer in collecting taxes from customers and employees/servants and remitting to the corporate governments in lieu of Franchise Fees. Let us not forget, slaves cannot own anything, are allowed only adequate food, shelter and clothing so to allow them to subsist and continue working the masters plantation, and thereby continue to generate revenues for that master. Caveat You are now in possession of the factual truths relative to the un-governed status of all geographic areas commonly called provinces and the de facto corporate status held by the governments. You are now aware of the restricted jurisdiction/authority held by these corporate governments de facto, according to their so-called laws. If you were, you are no longer ignorant. You now possess enough evidence to cause any individual of good conscience and morals, to work to create lawful governments. As you now possess this knowledge, should you carry out any further activities on behalf of or in the name of the corporate government de facto without first providing valid contrary evidence, then by your own free will you act to violate Human Rights. Choosing to continue, business as usual, in spite of your inability to disprove the facts contained herein, tells us you do so while having knowledge that what you do is unlawful, referred to in law as mens rea, or having a guilty mind with intent to commit a crime. You thereby provide your signed confessions. Estoppel by conduct shall apply. The twenty (20) calendar-day-period allowed for response to this Challenge will commence on the date of your receipt of these documents. Should any of you, as natural men or women, fail, neglect, or refuse to respond as required, that failure, neglect, or refusal will be your tacit agreement with all facts provided herein and your tacit admittance that the purely corporate governments have never possessed lawful authority outside their own geographic boundaries, i.e. CITY HALL. Legal actions will then commence against all involved, jointly and severally, in their private capacities as natural men and women to bring them before an international Human Rights Tribunal. Further to that, International Declarations and Claims will be filed with all appropriate bodies. We leave you to your study of these documents. Most sincerely, _____________________________________________ Autograph of Kapilano, naturally created man

_____________________________________________ Autograph of Senklip, naturally created man _____________________________________________ Autograph of Skookum manik, naturally created man

S-ar putea să vă placă și