Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
involved Civil and Constitutional Rights violations against a disabled adult. Judge
A. 1:06-cv-247-WSD
Judge, as shown in both Courts on February 6, 2006 on the 30th day after proper
Motion for Default, Motion to Strike. Doc. 4 Motion to Strike, see pg. 4; on pg. 5
the February 10, 2006 letter to Judge Duffey (ex-parte communication) Motion to
Dismiss Attached hereto Exhibit 1; Motion filed electronically March 1st 2006.
After timely complying with Order (Exhibit 3), on April 4, 2006 after
1
Removal pending for three (3) months, Judge Duffey Jr. Remanded for lack of
Removal having been improperly filed with Superior and District Courts, Rules of
Removal violated, Motions pending, or the fact defendants had defaulted in both
Courts.
B. 1:06-cv-2954-WSD
allegations for which I was found guilty by a Clerk of the Probate Court who broke
the law impersonated the Judge of DeKalb County Probate Court. All defendants
stated: (i) no other documents, evidence never disputed; (ii) that they had no
ignored; I was Pro Se, all defendants were represented, there were nine (9)
attorneys, or three (3) sets of attorneys. Judge Duffey created defenses, fabricated
2
Discovery was set for four (4) months; the case drug on seven (7) months,
dismissed for statute of limitations and immunity. The Docket Report consisted of
102 entries, no Rulings were made until dismissal; Docket Report attached Exhibit
5. Judge Duffey’s Ruling not once mentioned that: (a) I am disabled; (b) I had
Soon after the complaint was filed, I Motioned for Order to Show Cause for
TRO and Preliminary Injunction (Exhibit 5, pg. 2, # 6); within ten (10) days of
filing, called the clerk about a hearing, was told they would contact me. I heard
nothing until the final Ruling; Judge Duffey claimed that they had tried to contact
me, attached Exhibit 6, pg.29, fn6; untrue, I am disabled and can be reached
filed Motion to Waive Pacer Fees for my case only, to be able to keep up with
deadlines against nine attorneys doc. 26 w/Exhibits attached Exhibit 7, pg.3. Judge
Judge Duffey’s Ruling, pg.25 fn 24 “Although Defendants did not make the
argument…Probate Court, … are arms of the state…” First, since the argument
was not made, I did not have the chance to show otherwise, but on Appeal I did.
The statement is untrue, it fails the four-prong test shown Exhibit 8, pgs. 17-19.
3
Judge Duffey has violated his Oaths of Office, failed to uphold both Federal
and Georgia law and has failed to honor both the United States and State of
C. 1:08-cv-1971-WSD
Rights violations case due to illegal acts, use of fraudulent land documents, and
fraud upon the Court that occurred in a separate Superior Court action. Judge
Becker of Superior Court dismissed that suit in retaliation, the day after being
properly served. Judge Duffey’s Ruling Exhibit 9 pg. 3 fn 2 wrongly claimed that
“retaliation” was not claimed until Motion for Reconsideration was filed; Doc. 8
Exhibit 10 pg. 6, 1st ¶ and pg. 10 ¶¶s 4,5. filed June 30, 2008 shows otherwise.
Judge Duffey ignored perjury, and that it was repeatedly shown that the land
document used by defendants was fraudulent, did not pertain to Plaintiffs’ property,
that the Dr. claimed to have signed the document never existed Exhibit 10 pgs. 11-
12.
seeing that the Fourteenth Amendment is upheld for disabled persons seeking
redress for Civil and Constitutional Rights violations. Upon seeing that Superior
Court had conspired with and was aiding the defendants in that Court with the
4
deprivation of my Rights, and taking of real property, the case was filed in District
Court attempting to protect our Rights. Judge Duffey dismissed the case under
Exhibit 11 pgs. 2,3 fn1, and had no place in the Order Exhibit 9 pgs. 5,6. Further,
after being provided with undisputed evidence in the form of the undisputed
published Motion Calendar for Judge Becker for May 27, 2008 that showed no
hearings scheduled for Plaintiffs’ case, Judge Duffey still insisted that Plaintiffs
had missed a scheduled hearing, Exhibit 9 pgs. 2,6 fn4; the Motion Calendar is
attached hereto as Exhibit 12. Judge Duffey claimed that he didn’t know when the
Calendar was printed; defendants never objected to or disputed the evidence, Judge
Duffey in this case, again was defending for the defendants and disregarding
bring bias/prejudice against a party is not grounds for recusal, or grounds for
there will be no opportunity for Plaintiffs to pursue the Civil and Constitutional
Rights violations in State Court, Judge Duffey dismissed the case stating it could
be refiled later, but would be dismissed under res judicata, etc. Exhibit 11 pg. 21.