SWMfinal

Stormwater Management Design Manual
Acknowledgements
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This edition of the Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Design Manual could not have been completed without the guidance and assistance of key staff members from the Department of Environmental Resources, the Department of Public Works & Transportation, the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and the Prince Georges County Soil Conservation Service. These key members were part of the "Stormwater Management Design Manual Revision Workgroup" and are recognized herein: Derek Winogradoff, PPD, DER, Chair Stan Wildesen, PE, PRD, DER Reynaldo DeGuzman, PE, PRD, DER Melisa Reid, SDMD, OHM, DPW&T Karen Moreland, SDMD, OHM, DPW&T Ed Binseel, PE, DPW&T Haitham Hijazi, Ph.D., PE, DPW&T Erv Beckert, PE, DPW&T Larry Coffman, PPD, DER Paul DeSousa, PPD, DER Ratu Patel PRD, DER Henry Yen, PE, PRD, DER Rick Thompson, PRD, DER Manvinder Singh, PE, PRD, DER Tajendra Singh, PE, PRD, DER Jeff DeHan, CSD, DER Kim Finch, MNCPPC Jim Stasz, MNCPPC Mow-Soung Cheng, Ph.D., PE, PPD, DER Dave Bourdon, PGSCD Lance Gardner, PGSCD Beverly Covert, PRD, DER Beverly Warfield, PPD, DER
In additional to agency staff, special recognition is expressed for our consultant, Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc. for putting it all together. In particular, Paul Koch, Ph.D., PE and Rand Postell, PE, were an invaluable part of the process that led to the completed manual.
Prince Georges County
ii
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose .....................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Overview....................................................................................................1-1 1.3 General Drafting Standards .......................................................................1-2 PERMIT PROCESSING........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Application .................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Stormwater Concept Approval...................................................................2-1 2.3 Technical Approval ....................................................................................2-1 2.4 Agency Coordination .................................................................................2-1 2.5 Rights-Of-Way ...........................................................................................2-1 2.6 Bonds ........................................................................................................2-2 2.7 Floodplain Approval ...................................................................................2-2 2.8 Schedule of Permit Fees ...........................................................................2-2 2.8.1 Fee-in-Lieu of On-Site Management...........................................2-2 2.8.2 Review Fee .................................................................................2-4 2.8.3 Floodplain Service Fee ...............................................................2-5 2.8.4 Revision Fee ...............................................................................2-5 2.8.5 Special Drain Permit Fee ............................................................2-5 2.8.6 Updating of an Approved Plan ....................................................2-5 2.8.7 As-Built and Partial As-Built Plan Review Fee............................2-5 2.8.8 Special Maintenance Fee ...........................................................2-5 2.9 Special Drain Permit ..................................................................................2-5 STORMWATER CONCEPT PROCESS ...............................................................3-1 3.1 Guidelines..................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Conveyance Systems ................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Open Systems ............................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Closed Systems ..........................................................................3-2 3.3 Water Quality.............................................................................................3-3 3.3.1 Exempt Development Activities ..................................................3-3 3.3.2 Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria ..............................................3-4 3.3.3 Low Impact Development (LID) ..................................................3-4 3.3.4 Chesapeake Bay Critical Area (CBCA).......................................3-4 3.4 Quantity Control.........................................................................................3-5 3.5 Redevelopment Projects ...........................................................................3-5 3.6 Existing Off-site Erosion/Flooding/Conveyance Problems ........................3-6 3.7 Variances or Modification of Requirements ...............................................3-6 3.8 Public Maintenance versus Private Maintenance......................................3-7 3.9 Stormwater Hotspots .................................................................................3-8 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN ..........................................................4-1 4.1 Stormwater Design Plan Criteria ...............................................................4-1 4.1.1 General .......................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Plan Drawings and Documents...................................................4-1 4.2 Storm Drain Conveyance Criteria ..............................................................4-8 4.2.1 General .......................................................................................4-8 4.2.2 Design Criteria ............................................................................4-8
2.0
3.0
4.0
ii
Stormwater Management Design Manual 4.2.3
Table of Contents
4.3
4.4
4.5
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Computations for Design Conveyance Systems ...............................................................4-14 4.2.4 Design of Conveyance System.................................................4-16 Infiltration Devices ...................................................................................4-19 4.3.1 General .....................................................................................4-19 4.3.2 Trench Design Criteria ..............................................................4-20 4.3.3 Infiltration Computations ...........................................................4-22 Hydrodynamic Water Quality Separators ................................................4-22 4.4.1 General .....................................................................................4-22 Hydrodynamic separators may only be utilized for pretreatment, retrofit projects, or redevelopment projects...............................4-22 4.4.2 Design Procedures ...................................................................4-22 Stormwater Management Ponds and Stormwater Wetlands...................4-24 4.5.1 General .....................................................................................4-24 4.5.2 Design Criteria ..........................................................................4-24 4.5.3 Hydrologic & Hydraulic Computations for Stormwater Management .............................................................................4-29 4.5.4 Underground Attenuation Facilities...........................................4-30 4.5.5 Stormwater Management Geotechnical Information.................4-31
5.0
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................5-1 5.1 General......................................................................................................5-1 5.2 LID Planning Techniques to Reduce the Post-development LID CN ........5-3 5.3 LID Techniques to Maintain the Predevelopment Time of Concentration ............................................................................................5-4 5.4 Retention and Detention Storage ..............................................................5-5 5.5 Determination of Design Storm Event .......................................................5-6 5.6 LID Techniques .........................................................................................5-7 5.7 Steps to LID Plan Processing....................................................................5-9 5.7.1 Step 1: LID Planning and Site Analysis. ....................................5-9 5.7.2 Step 2: Pre-preliminary Planning Phase ....................................5-9 5.7.3 Step 3: Stormwater Concept Plan Phase ..................................5-9 5.7.4 Step 4: Preliminary Plan/subdivision Review and Approval.......5-9 5.7.5 Step 5: Technical Review Phase ...............................................5-9 5.7.6 Step 6: Fees and Bonds ............................................................5-9 5.7.7 Step 7: Construction/Inspection Phase....................................5-10 5.7.8 Step 8: Public Outreach and Education ...................................5-10 5.7.9 Step 9: Maintenance ................................................................5-10 5.8 Pre-Preliminary Plan Phase ....................................................................5-10 5.9 Stormwater Concept Plan Phase ............................................................5-11 5.10 Preliminary Plan/Subdivision Review and Detail Site Plan/Specific Design Plan Approval ..............................................................................5-11 5.11 Technical Review Phase .........................................................................5-11 5.11.1 LID Plan Submittal ....................................................................5-12 5.11.2 Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Submittal..........................5-12 5.12 Fees and Bonding ...................................................................................5-12 5.13 Construction/Inspection Phase................................................................5-12 5.14 Public Outreach and Education ...............................................................5-13 5.15 Maintenance ............................................................................................5-13
iii
Table of Contents
6.0
STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.......................................6-1 6.1 Storm Drain Easement Submission Requirements ...................................6-1 6.2 Surface Drainage And Floodplain Easements...........................................6-3 6.3 Procedures For Release And Abandonment .............................................6-4 6.4 Revision Submission For Public Storm Drains ..........................................6-4 6.5 Declaration Of Covenants .........................................................................6-5 6.6 Permitting ..................................................................................................6-5 6.7 Floodplain Easement Requirements .........................................................6-5 6.7.1 Guidelines ...................................................................................6-5 6.7.2 Submission Requirements ..........................................................6-6 6.7.3 Release of Floodplain Easements ..............................................6-6 BONDING .............................................................................................................7-1 7.1 Introduction................................................................................................7-1 7.2 Construction Cost Estimates .....................................................................7-1 7.3 General Instructions ..................................................................................7-1 7.4 Municipal Bond ..........................................................................................7-1 7.5 Departmental Bonding...............................................................................7-2 7.6 Requirements for Bond Submittal..............................................................7-3 7.7 Bond Releases ..........................................................................................7-4 FLOODPLAINS.....................................................................................................8-1 8.1 Introduction................................................................................................8-1 8.2 Authority of Jurisdiction .............................................................................8-1 8.3 Acceptable Studies....................................................................................8-2 8.4 GIS-based Floodplain Submittals ..............................................................8-2 8.4.1 FEMA and MDE Acceptance ......................................................8-3 8.5 Requirements for Private Consultant Engineering Studies........................8-3 8.6 Items (Data/Information) Needed from Engineer for Private Consultant Engineering Studies ................................................................8-5 8.6.1 Report .........................................................................................8-5 8.6.2 Hydrology....................................................................................8-6 8.6.3 Hydraulics ...................................................................................8-6 8.7 Review Criteria ..........................................................................................8-7 8.7.1 Hydrology....................................................................................8-7 8.7.2 Hydraulics ...................................................................................8-8 8.7.3 Others .......................................................................................8-12 QUALITY ASSURANCE.......................................................................................9-1 9.1 Objective....................................................................................................9-1 9.2 Suppliers....................................................................................................9-1 9.3 Approved Materials....................................................................................9-1 9.4 Materials Release......................................................................................9-2 9.5 Site Inspections .........................................................................................9-2 9.6 Plant Inspections .......................................................................................9-2
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT .................................................................10-1 10.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................10-1 10.2 Scope ......................................................................................................10-1 10.3 Authority And Responsibilities .................................................................10-1 10.3.1 Stormwater Management Inspectors ........................................10-1 10.3.2 Coordination Among County and Other Inspectors ..................10-2
iv
Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.3.3 10.3.4
Table of Contents
Inspection Responsibilities........................................................10-2 Ponds Approved by Prince Georges Soil Conservation District .......................................................................................10-4 10.3.5 Other Stormwater Systems.......................................................10-4 10.4 Inspection Requirements During Construction ........................................10-5 10.4.1 Guidelines .................................................................................10-5 10.4.2 Field Changes...........................................................................10-5 10.4.3 Required Stormwater Management Procedures and Inspections................................................................................10-5 10.5 Approval Stickers...................................................................................10-10 10.5.1 Purpose...................................................................................10-10 10.5.2 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-10 10.5.3 Responsibilities .......................................................................10-10 10.5.4 DER Inspectors.......................................................................10-11 10.6 Field Inspection Report..........................................................................10-11 10.6.1 Purpose...................................................................................10-11 10.6.2 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-11 10.7 Notice Of Violation And Stop Work Orders............................................10-11 10.7.1 Purpose...................................................................................10-11 10.7.2 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-12 10.8 Fee Imposition and Collection ...............................................................10-13 10.8.1 Special Investigation Fees ......................................................10-13 10.8.2 Re-inspection Fees .................................................................10-14 10.9 Civil Citations.........................................................................................10-14 10.9.1 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-14 10.10 Complaints.............................................................................................10-14 10.10.1 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-14 10.11 Maintenance Inspections.......................................................................10-15 10.11.1 Purpose...................................................................................10-15 10.11.2 Scope and Applicability...........................................................10-15 10.11.3 Responsibilities and Procedures.............................................10-15 10.12 Administrative Procedures For Submitting As-Built Plans .....................10-15 10.12.1 As-Built Requirements - Infiltration Trench .............................10-16 10.12.2 As-Built Requirements - Retention Or Detention Pond/Basin.10-17 10.12.3 As-Built Requirements - Pipe System.....................................10-19 10.12.4 As-Built Requirements - Underground Detention System.......10-20
Table of Contents
APPENDICES
1-1 2-1 2-2 3-1 3-2 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7a 4-7b 4-7c 4-7d 4-7e 4-7f 4-8 4-9 4-10a 4-10b 4-11a 4-11b 4-11c 4-12a 4-12b 4-13a 4-13b 4-13c 4-13d 4-13e 4-13f 4-13g 4-13h 4-14a 4-14b 4-14c 4-14d 4-14e 4-14f 4-14g 4-14h 4-14i 4-15
Stormwater Management Ordinance Storm Drain Construction Permit Special Drain Permit Application for Stormwater Concept Plan Approval Concept Approval Letter Stormwater Technical Plan Review Submission Checklist Prince Georges County, Maryland, Rainfall Intensity Data Storm Drain Pipe Size Computation Table Computation Example for Head Loss in Storm Sewer Structures Inlet Design Computation Chart for Use with the Rational Method Pipe Discharge Rates Using Manning's Formula with n = 0.013 Gutter Flow Rates for 1/4" Cross Slope 5' Curb Opening Inlet Capacity 10' Curb Opening Inlet Capacity 15' Curb Opening Inlet Capacity 20' Curb Opening Inlet Capacity Inlet Spread and Capacity Graph Pipe Loading Chart for RCP Determination of Minimum Structure Width for Pipe Entering at an Angle Pipe Schedule & Pipe Summary Structural Schedule Determining Mannings 'n' Limiting Velocities for Rip-Rap Lining Riprap Plunge Pool Design Marlboro Clay Criteria Shallow Tests Procedure Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 1 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 2 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 4 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 5 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 6 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 8 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 14 Bureau of Public Roads Pipe Chart 15 Typical Cross Section along Centerline of Dam Typical Principal Spillway Profile Stage Storage Computation Stage Storage Curve Typical Barrel/Riser Structure Weir Flow Weir Flow Weir Flow Stage Discharge Curve Approval Stamps
vi
Stormwater Management Design Manual 4-16 4-17 4-18 4-19 4-20 4-21 6-1 6-2 6-3 6-4 7-1 7-2 7-3 7-4 7-5 8-1
Table of Contents
MD-378 Small Pond Approval Letter Pond Summary Sheet MD14 Plants for SWM Facilities Guidelines for Stormwater Management Facilities to be located on M-NCPPC Property in Prince Georges County Geotextile Fabric (Filter Cloth) List Rights-Of-Way Survey Transmittal Declaration of Covenants Release of Rights-Of-Way Survey Transmittal Easement Criteria Stormwater Management Performance Bond Irrevocable Letter of Credit Irrevocable Assignment of Account Corporate Acknowledgement for Financial Institutions Bond Estimate Form Floodplain Transmittal
vii
Table of Contents
Abbreviations The following abbreviations are used in the manual. ASTM BMP BPR CBCA COG CFS DAM DER DPW&T ED FEMA FP GIS HEC HGL IMP LID MDE M-NCPPC NPDES NRCS PGSCD RCN RCP ROW SD SHA SPECS STDS SWCP SWTP SWM SWMF SWMSD Tc TR-20 TR-55 USGS WSSC American Society of Testing and Materials Best Management Practice Bureau of Public Roads Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Overlay Zone Council of Governments Cubic Feet Per Second Drainage Area Map Department of Environmental Resources Department of Public Works and Transportation, Prince George's County Extended Detention Federal Emergency Management Administration Floodplain Geographic Information System Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydraulic Gradient Line Integrated Management Practice Low Impact Development Maryland Department of the Environment Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Natural Resources Conservation Service Prince George's Soil Conservation District Runoff Curve Number Reinforced Concrete Pipe Rights-of-Way Storm Drain State Highway Administration, Maryland Specifications Standards Stormwater Concept Plan Stormwater Technical Plan Stormwater Management Stormwater Management Facility Stormwater Management Standard Details Time of Concentration Soil Conservation Service (National Resources Conservation Service) Technical Release #20 (Computer Program for Project Formulation Hydrology) Soil Conservation Service (National Resources Conservation Service) Technical Release #55 (Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds) United States Geological Survey Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
viii
Chapter 1 - Introduction
CHAPTER 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This manual is being provided to assist the stormwater management engineer/designer in the design of systems that achieve the goals of the County's Stormwater Management Ordinance. Every effort has been made to provide a guidance document that is technically clear and consistent. Because site conditions will vary, however, it shall remain the engineer's responsibility to review and verify the applicability of all material presented herein as it pertains to any specific project. If the designer believes that strict adherence to the established design criteria is not suitable for a particular situation, a variation may be requested from DER. 1.1 Purpose
In 2001, in order to comply with the latest MDE Stormwater Management Regulations, and to provide for necessary revisions and updates, the Prince George's County Stormwater Management Ordinance has been modified (Appendix 1-1). The intent of the Ordinance is to ensure that land development and redevelopment projects in the County include stormwater management systems that: 1.2 Replicate, as much as possible, the pre-developed hydrology, and runoff and recharge characteristics of a site. Prevent loss of life and significant property damage that would otherwise be caused by major storms. Provide an acceptable degree of access and use of property during and following less severe storms. Preserve, to the extent possible, desirable natural watercourses and natural habitats. Adequately convey stormwater flows from upstream sources. Mitigate the adverse effects of stormwater flow onto downstream properties. Overview
Prince Georges County DER is responsible for administering an effective stormwater program. This manual has been prepared to meet that responsibility by incorporating the latest policies procedures and technologies. Specific changes have been made to incorporate the use of Low Impact Development Technology and the 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual. The overall goals of this manual are to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Improve practices and standards, Avoid problems related to grading and drainage, Promote environmentally sensitive designs, Minimize maintenance burdens, and Identify and streamline processes.
1-1
Stormwater Management Design Manual 1.3 General Drafting Standards
All technical plans must be produced on clean 2' by 3' mylar sheets that can be duplicated clearly and will be acceptable for microfilming or digitizing. All plans must first be inspected prior to submittal to check for accuracy and to correct any problems before the prints are filed. The following standards shall be applied: 1. Acceptable scales for drawings are as follows: Plan Views: 1" = 50' minimum 1" = 30', 1" = 20' and 1" = 10' may be utilized for higher density plans and small projects Profiles: Horizontal SWM Plans Storm Drain Plans 1" = 50', 1" = 30' 1" = 20, 1" = 10' 1" = 50' 1" = 5' Vertical 1" = 5', 1" = 2'
Details: Scale shall be multiplier of 1/8" = 1'-0", up to 3" = 1'-0 With respect to symbols, graphic connections, abbreviations, etc., the drawings shall conform to the Conventional Symbols shown in Standard Details 1.0, or the recommendations of the American Institute of Architects and Architectural Graphic Standard. 2. The date on which the contract drawings are completed shall be shown. All revision dates, together with nature of each revision affected after signature, shall be noted in the 4-inch revision block on the right side of each drawing. All benchmarks shall be shown on the plans. A complete description of each benchmark stating designation, location, elevation, and datum reference shall be shown near their respective locations on the plan. Coordinates shall be based on the Maryland State Plane Coordinate System and bearings shall be related to true north. Three registration marks shall be labeled on each plan view. Limits of development shall be clearly and concisely shown on all drawings.
3.
4. 5.
1-2
6.
On the Vicinity Map, the areas of proposed work shall be clearly identified by an arrow and the word "Site". Location of Vicinity Map shall generally be in the upper right hand corner of the first sheet. Vicinity map scale shall generally be 1" = 2000', and shall include 200 foot grid map. Generally, each sheet shall be oriented so that the north arrow points toward the top or toward the left side of the sheet. Symbols and abbreviations shall be in accordance with DER Standard Detail 1.0 entitled "Storm Drain Conventional Symbols". Wherever symbols fail to satisfactorily convey the requisite information, notes shall be used. Drawings in the same contract shall be cross-referenced by accession numbers. Match lines with a minimum length of 4" shall be identified by accession number of the matching sheet and shall be used wherever the plan is to be continued on the same or another sheet.
7. 8.
9.
10. Duplicate dimensions shall be eliminated as much as possible. Retaining basic overall dimensions will help to register various different views to one another. 11. Plans will be acceptable only if all line work and lettering thereon are concise, legible, and are readily capable of being reproduced. 12. Notes shall not be placed in hatched or shaded areas. Crowding of notes into a small space shall be avoided. Leader lines shall be used to clarify the item referenced. Notes should appear close to the items to which they refer. They should not be grouped in one area of the sheet. 13. Dimensions relative to structural components shall be indicated in feet and inches. Floor elevations, storm drain invert elevations, structure elevations, and finished grade elevations shall be shown to hundredths of a foot. General earthwork grades and utility elevations shall be shown to tenths of a foot. 14. Where two or more individuals assist in the preparation of a drawing or drawings, individual styles and software shall be coordinated so as to depict work in a generally uniform style. 15. All lettering in the same contract shall be of the same style, well-formed, dense black and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing. Minimum height of letters shall be: a. b. Notes 1/8" (12 point font) and legibly spaced Title 1/4" (24 point font)
16. No lettering shall be smaller than 1/8". Spacing between lines shall be at least 1/2 the height of a character's size being used. When ink, light pencil and stick-ons are used on the same drawing, an effort should be made to match the density as closely as is reasonably possible. Exceptions are allowable for structure schedules and the like, as long as DER determines that they are legible.
1-3
17. A variety of drawing materials can be used that will produce a dense, sharp and uniform character and line. Recommended pencils for polyester film are E-2 and softer, for linens, 2-H and softer. Ink is preferred above all, and "plastic lead" will be allowed. Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) is allowed, provided that "hard copies" of the drawings are submitted. 18. Adhesive stick-ons should be pressure-sensitive applique applied to the front side of the drawing and consist of a material that is completely transparent. Stick-ons that have become faded due to age are not acceptable. In general, adhesive stick-ons should be avoided in favor or original plan text layout. 19. Adhesive shading sheet and patterns shall be limited to streets, stormwater management permanent pools and other areas determined appropriate by DER. 20. Abbreviations, ditto marks or ditto abbreviations shall not be used unless such abbreviations are self-evident and well-known in the construction industry. 21. The ground line on the profile shall represent the elevations along the center line of the proposed improvement such as along the center line of stormdrain pipe system. Where the proposed surface grade differs from the existing grade, the proposed grade will be indicated using a solid line and existing grade using a broken (dashed) line.
1-4
Chapter 2 Permit Processing
CHAPTER 2
2.0 PERMIT PROCESSING
The public stormwater construction permit can be processed quickly and efficiently if all necessary information is included with the permit application. Below is an explanation of the information required in order to obtain the permit. The permit issuance is a separate process from technical approval and may take additional time for issuance depending upon how quickly the applicant can obtain rights-of-way, easements and bonding. With proper planning and coordination, the permit processing time requirements can be kept to a minimum. The items discussed below should be used as a checklist prior to permit application. 2.1 Application
An application for a stormwater system construction permit must be completed accurately and submitted by the applicant to DER. Appendix 2-1 illustrates the proper application form. It is important to note that: 1) The name and address of the owner/developer and the engineer on the application must be the same as on the technically approved plan; 2) The application must be signed by the owner or an authorized agent; 3) The plan name must include subdivision, lots, blocks or sections to be permitted; 4) The application must include the map/grid coordinates from the Alexandria Drafting Companys Prince Georges County Road Location Map; and, 5) It must be typed or clearly printed. 2.2 Stormwater Concept Approval
Stormwater Management Concept approval is required for any construction in the County. It is also required (except in the City of Bowie) prior to submission of the storm drain/stormwater management plans for technical review and approval by DER. Concept and planning information can be found in Chapter 3, Stormwater Management Concept Plan. 2.3 Technical Approval
A technically approved storm drain/stormwater management plan must be submitted with the permit application. Obtaining technical approval is only one of the several requirements before the permit can be issued. Chapter 4 titled Stormwater Management Design gives a detailed description of the technical approval procedure and requirements. 2.4 Agency Coordination
Other applicable permits from Federal, State or other local agencies may be required. It is the applicants responsibility to recognize the need to obtain all other necessary permits. 2.5 Rights-Of-Way
All on-site and off-site rights-of-ways required for storm drain/stormwater management construction and maintenance must be properly executed and submitted with the permit application. Chapter 5 titled Rights-of-Way gives a detailed description of the rights-of-way process.
2-1
Stormwater Management Design Manual 2.6 Bonds
Construction Performance bonds must be approved and submitted with the permit application. Bond approval can be obtained once the plans have been technically approved and the engineer/consultant cost estimate has been approved by DER. The approved cost estimate will serve as the amount of the necessary Performance Bond. Refer to Chapter 7 titled Bonding for bonding information. 2.7 Floodplain Approval
When applicable, floodplain approval must be obtained from DER and submitted with the permit application. Chapter 8 titled Floodplains lists the floodplain study and approval requirements. 2.8 Schedule of Permit Fees
There are seven types of fees a permittee may be required to pay before receiving a storm drain permit. These are: 1) fee-in-lieu; 2) review fee; 3) floodplain service fee; 4) revision fee; 5) special drain connection permit fee; 6) as-built plan review fee; and 7) special maintenance fee for SWM ponds. These fees must be paid prior to the issuance of the permit and are described in the following sections. 2.8.1 Fee-in-Lieu of On-Site Management
At the concept approval stage, a development project will be assessed a fee if on-site stormwater management requirements are waived or reduced. In some cases land conveyance, stormwater management facility construction, or offsite improvements may be required in addition to or in place of a monetary contribution, as determined appropriate by DER. The fee-in-lieu will be utilized to fund the design, construction and modification of stormwater management facilities and improvements throughout the County. The stormwater management fee is currently assessed in accordance with Schedule 1. This schedule was established in 2001 and is subject to periodic revisions. Fees for any other zone not included in this schedule will be based on the proposed land use at a rate of $16,000 per impervious acre. For residential uses, the fee will be proportioned on a dwelling unit basis at $750 (max.) per dwelling unit. 1) Credits for Fee-in-Lieu A reduction in the assessed fee will be made for each of the following on-site stormwater measures that the applicant is required to provide: a) b) c) Water quality management or LID. (1/3 reduction) 1-year extended detention or LID. (1/3 reduction) Flood control facilities (10-year or 100-year stormwater management). (1/3 reduction)
2-2
Zone O-S R-A R-E R-R R-80 R-55 R-35 R-T R-20 R-30 R-18 R-H R-10 I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 C (All) 2)
Schedule 1 - Stormwater Management Fee Typical Residential Fee Per Fee Per Acre Non % Impervious Dwelling Unit Residential Uses 1.0 -$160 1.5 -240 12.0 $750 1920 18.0 750 2880 22.0 750 3520 26.0 750 4160 40.0 750 6400 50.0 750 8000 50.0 750 8000 50.0 750 8000 55.0 750 8800 75.0 250 12,000 75.0 250 12,000 80.0 -12,800 80.0 -12,800 75.0 -12,000 70.0 -11,200 90.0 -14,400
Reductions in Fee-In-Lieu Rate A fee reduction will be considered in cases where the impervious area of a development is less than the maximum impervious area allowed under the Countys zoning regulation. The site plan must be approved by the Planning Board and the applicant must demonstrate that future increases in the impervious area of the site are not likely. For residential zones, the fee reduction will be proportioned on a dwelling unit basis. The fee reduction will be calculated using the following formula: Actual Impervious Acreage x $16,000 Fee Waivers Should it be appropriate to modify the fee to compensate for the applicants non-floodplain land to be used for a County water quality or stormwater facility, a reduction of the fee will be made considering the cost of the land versus the potential fee for the developed site. Special Credits For industrial and commercial developments, consideration shall be given to reducing the fees by excluding from the fee computation undeveloped area (i.e., floodplain property) and areas where subsequent Stormwater Concept Plan approvals will be required. See Chapter 3 Stormwater Management Concept Plan for fee reductions where off-site mitigation is pursued.
2-3
2.8.2 1)
Review Fee Types of fees and rates: (This covers services of storm drain review and approval, inspection, bonding and recordation). a) Review of stormwater concept plans: b) c) d) Single residential lot - $100.00 All others - $250.00
Review of public storm drain system - $3.00 per linear foot of public storm drain pipe. (Note: $250.00 minimum charge) Review of private storm drain system - $1.50 per linear foot of private storm drain pipe. (Note: $125.00 minimum charge) Review of floodplain study performed by Engineer/Consultant $0.50 per linear foot of stream within the property plus $200.00 per structure setting floodplain elevation with no study - $50.00
2) 3)
The review fee charges for County schools will be of the above schedule. Prince Georges County affiliated public services (e.g., public health services, mental health services, schools, hospitals, libraries, fire departments, detention centers, Department of Public Works and Transportation, Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, WSSC, Office of Central Services, etc.) will be charged. Municipal Participation: Municipal projects, which are being jointly designed and/or constructed by DER are exempt from review fees. Federal and State projects will be required to pay full fees. Non-profit organizations, churches, chartered cities, and municipalities will be required to pay 1/2 fees. Collection Procedures: Public and private review fees are collected when plans are submitted for technical review. Revision fee, special drain permit fee, DER manuals, and map book fees are paid at the time services are rendered. The feein-lieu is collected before a permit is issued for a public storm drain system and before release of approved plans for private storm drain systems. Refund Procedures: For overpayment of fees due to deletion and/or changes of plans, send a request to DER for processing. DER will complete P.G. County Form 114 for forwarding to the Office of Finance.
4) 5) 6) 7)
8)
2-4
2.8.3
Floodplain Service Fee
The fee schedule for conducting the floodplain study using the Countys GIS-based floodplain models and for providing floodplain information to the public is assessed in accordance with the following schedule: Studies for existing channel conditions only Studies for both existing and proposed channel conditions Studies for a single lot Fee for a Floodplain Inquiry 2.8.4 Revision Fee $2,500.00 $3,500.00 $250.00 $50.00
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the original review fee with a minimum fee of $100.00. Minor revisions such as updating plan approval, changing applicant name and other minor changes (as determined by DER) that do not result in a change to the design will be charged a fee of $100.00. 2.8.5 Special Drain Permit Fee
Special drain permits will be issued for small construction projects as described under the Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Ordinance in Appendix 1-1. The plans may be reviewed on a walk-in basis, and will be charged a review fee of $100.00 per connection. See Appendix 2-3 for Special Drain Permit Form to be utilized for such purposes. 2.8.6 Updating of an Approved Plan
An update is required if a storm drain permit is not obtained within the 24-month period after technical approval of the plans. A fee of $100.00 will be charged for updating the plans. Plans will not be updated after the expiration date of the approved Stormwater Management Concept Plan unless an updated concept is obtained. 2.8.7 As-Built and Partial As-Built Plan Review Fee
A fee of $250.00 will be charged for all as-built plan submittals. 2.8.8 Special Maintenance Fee
A special maintenance fee may be required for SWM ponds. The special maintenance fee will be 10% of the bonded cost estimate amount with a minimum fee of $10,000. 2.9 Special Drain Permit
A special drain permit is issued to private property owners when they wish to connect a private storm drainage system to an existing public system that is maintained by the County or when stormwater management/water quality systems that are required by State agencies must be connected to the existing or proposed public system which will be maintained by the County. Examples of system connections which would qualify for a special drain permit are sump pumps, underdrains and minor field connections. See Appendix 2-2 for the special drain permit application form.
2-5
Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan
CHAPTER 3
3.0
STORMWATER CONCEPT PROCESS
The purpose of the Stormwater Concept Plan (SWCP) is to ensure that quality control, quantity control and proper disposition of stormwater is considered early in the planning stage of the development process. Every new development (including expansions, additions and redevelopment) in Prince Georges County, except those with approved plans from the City of Bowie, must have an SWCP approved by Prince Georges County DER. To obtain this approval, the applicant must submit a completed Application for Stormwater Concept Plan Approval (see Appendix 3-1). This Approval (Appendix 3-2) must be obtained prior to the approval of a Preliminary Plan of Subdivision or submission of a Conceptual Site Plan to the MNCPPC. 3.1 Guidelines
The control and disposition of stormwater is a mixture of art and science, which determines how the stormwater system will "fit" within the proposed land use, whether or not a drainage course should be open or closed, the degree of protection required for existing natural features and the impact the development will have on groundwater recharge, stream stability (physical and biological) and on other properties, especially those downgrade from the development. The components of a stormwater management system are generally classified into three (3) major categories: conveyance, quality control and quantity control. Design requirements for each of these categories must be addressed for each land development project. At a minimum, quality controls must be provided for every development unless expressly exempt under the provisions of the Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Ordinance. The intent of the conceptual planning process is to determine the stormwater elements that are required for the proposed development. Sufficient engineering analyses must be done to show that the concept is valid. A stormwater design plan should not be undertaken until after the SWCP has been approved. The stormwater design plan will be checked on the basis of the approved SWCP. A revised concept letter must be obtained if significant changes in the site development proposal are made. Approved concept plans expire after three (3) years. 3.2 3.2.1 Conveyance Systems Open Systems Open drainage in a natural undisturbed watercourse is generally encouraged provided no further improvements to the watercourse will be required after ultimate watershed development and an open system is compatible with the proposed land use of the property, and with future development of adjacent properties. With proper planning, open drainage systems can be used to safely carry runoff, preserve water quality, protect stream habitat and improve the aesthetic value of the project.
3-1
1)
Planning Considerations: a) Floodplain/Lot Separation - A 100-year floodplain easement or surface drainage easement is required for open systems not in public space. In general, residential lots (less than 2 acres) must be separated from the floodplain by a distance sufficient to accommodate future stream channel changes and possible floodplain elevation increases. The minimum distance typically required between the floodplain and residential lot lines is 50 feet. In no case can residential structures be closer than 25 feet from the floodplain limit. Stability - Some erosion in natural streams can be expected; however, unless the channel is reasonably stable and is expected to remain stable after ultimate development of the watershed or is a sufficient distance from lots/improvements, stabilization measures will be required. The importance of stability increases as the proximity of lot improvements to the stream decreases. In all cases, sufficient floodplain easements and/or erosion protection must be provided so that the channel will not meander out of the easements within the foreseeable future. In general, open natural channels are not permissible on residential lots smaller than 2 acres. Exceptions may be permitted when Low Impact Development techniques are being utilized or as otherwise determined by DER. Water Quality and Habitat Protection Open Drainage Conveyance Systems increase the opportunity for infiltration, interception, retention and detention of stormwater. The use of open drainage conveyance systems can reduce the amount of storm drain infrastructure, and increase the time of concentration (Tc). In general an open drainage conveyance system must be designed to carry the 10-year storm with a safe overflow of the 100-year storm. Open drainage conveyance systems will require approval from DPW&T when residential lot frontage is less than 100-feet.
b)
c)
3.2.2
Closed Systems Except for desirable natural watercourses through open space areas and large residential lots, stormwater surface flows across developed residential properties are limited to 5 cfs for a 10-year design storm. Concentrated flows exceeding 5 cfs generally require piping. Exception to this requirement can be requested on a sitespecific basis. When the County determines that due to erosion potential or flooding potential or when Marlboro clay outcrops or other clays with high shrink/well potential exist, closed systems may be required for 10-year concentrated flows of more than 2 cfs. 1) Planning Considerations a) Pipe systems must be designed to accommodate the amount of flow that would be generated from ultimate development conditions without any controls in place for attenuating the flow. The pipe systems must be deep enough to allow future upstream extensions. Entrance and outfall structures are to be located off residential lots and beyond development limits. It is important to realize that this normally requires the acquisition of storm drain Rights-Of-Way from adjacent property owners.
b)
3-2
Failure to obtain an off-site Rights-Of-Way can severely delay stormwater permitting. Early consideration of Rights-Of-Way requirements is advisable. c) For those situations in which a Rights-Of-Way cannot be obtained, satisfactory evidence must be provided proving that a sincere effort to obtain the Rights-OfWay has been made and that the developer is willing to meet all reasonable demands of the intended grantor. In the following cases, an entrance or outfall structure may be located at the edge of the development site: 1) On residential lots if the location is sufficiently distant from the house; allows fencing of the lot; does not result in a ditch greater than three feet deep; will not otherwise adversely affect the appearance and use of the lot; and will not result in damage to the up- or down-grade property; 2) On non-residential properties if located a minimum of 4 feet away from the property line; and will not result in damage to the up-or down-grade property. Generally, the peak flow onto the downstream property(s) may not be increased. 100-Year Overflow Path/Lot Relationships - Since almost all closed systems are designed to convey flow from less than the largest storm that could occur or may not be fully functional due to obstruction, etc., an overflow path through the development must be provided to convey the 100-year flows without causing structural flooding or property damage. For buildings located upstream of a culvert, the lowest entry elevation shall be a minimum of 1' above the road overflow elevation.
d)
3.3
Water Quality
Water quality BMP's should be provided according to the MDE Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria or Low Impact Development Techniques except where exempt or where Variances are granted (3.7). 3.3.1 Exempt Development Activities
As set forth in Section 4-320 of the County Stormwater Management Ordinance, the following activities are exempt from providing stormwater management: 1. Agricultural land management activities. 2. Additions or modifications to existing detached single family dwellings if they disturb less than 5,000 square feet of land area, with the exception of areas within the CBCA. 3. Grading activities that do not disturb more than 5,000 square feet of land area with the exception of areas within the CBCA. 4. Developments within the City of Bowie where the City has approved stormwater management plans. 5. Land development activities, that are regulated by MDE under specific State laws such as Federal and State government construction activities.
3-3
3.3.2
Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria
Water quality requirements can be met by utilizing the MDE Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria (Chapter 2.0 of the Maryland Stormwater Design Manual). 1. Water Quality Volume (WQv) WQv = (1.0)(Rv)(A) / 12 where Rv = 0.05 + 0.009 (I) where I is the percent impervious cover A = runoff area (acres) 2. Recharge Volume (Rev) Rev = (S)(Rv)(A) / 12 where S = 0.38 in for HSG 'A' soils S = 0.25 in for HSG 'B' soils S = 0.13 in for HSG 'C' soils S = 0.06 in for HSG 'D' soils 3. Channel Protection Storage (Cpv) To protect stream channels from erosion, 24-hour extended detention of the one-year 24hour storm event shall be provided. 3.3.3 Low Impact Development (LID)
The low impact development approach combines a hydrologically functional site design with pollution prevention measures to reduce impacts and compensate for development impacts on hydrology and water quality. Hydrologic function such as infiltration, frequency and volume of discharges, and groundwater recharge can be maintained with the use of reduced impervious surfaces, functional grading, open channel sections, disconnection of impervious areas and the use of bioretention/filtration landscape areas. Utilizing land development techniques and Integrated Management Practes (IMPs) in accordance with the Prince George's County DER Low Impact Development Design Manual may meet County and State requirements for stormwater management, if Water Quality Volume (WQv), Groundwater Recharge Volume (Rev), and Channel Protection Storage Volume (Cpv) are addressed. See Chapter 5 (Low Impact Development), the Prince Georges County Low Impact Design Development Design Manual and the Prince Georges County Bioretention Manual for specific guidance. 3.3.4 Chesapeake Bay Critical Area (CBCA)
Projects located within the CBCA must meet the requirements of: 1. Prince George's County CBCA Program A Property Owner's Guide, September 1990 (DER), and 2. Critical Area and You: The Chesapeake's First Line of Defense. CBCA Commission 45 Calvert Street, 2nd Floor Annapolis, MD 21401
3-4
Stormwater Management Design Manual 3.4 Quantity Control
Development normally increases downstream peak flows and total flow quantities by increasing the impervious area and reducing the travel times within the drainage systems. In order to determine whether Quantity Control is required, a downstream analysis must be completed. The extent of the analysis is dependent upon the development's potential for adverse impacts. Factors that affect the magnitude of impact are the size and type of development, the size and type of drainage system, and the use of the land through which the system passes downstream. Generally, the downstream analysis should extend to a point at which the flow from the development is less than ten percent of the total flow in the stream. In those situations where there is an obvious risk of adverse downgrade impacts on other properties, an analysis will be required regardless of the percentage of flow increase. Quantity Control of the ten-year storm may be required at the discretion of DER if the downstream analysis indicates that the existing downstream infrastructure and/or conveyance system has inadequate capacity to safely handle the 10-year storm. Quantity Control of the 100-year storm may be required at the discretion of DER if the downstream analysis indicates that: 1. Previous flooding has occurred; or 2. Houses would be within 25-feet of the 100-year floodplain; or 3. Buildings other than houses would be within the 100-year floodplain. If the downstream analysis indicates that existing infrastructure is impacted, the engineer should contact DPW&T for their input prior to obtaining concept approval. 3.5 Redevelopment Projects 1) Redevelopment projects are required to: a) b) c) d) conform to the County's LID methodogy; or provide a 20% reduction in impervious surface area; or provide water quality measures (WQv only) for 20% of the impervious area; or provide a combination of impervious area reduction and water quality measures (WQv only) equivalent to a 20% reduction in impervious surface area; and provide water quality (WQv, Rev, and Cpv) for any increase in impervious surface area.
e) 2)
Redevelopment projects located within Transportation District Overlay Zones (TDOZs) must meet the specific stormwater management and water quality requirements described in the TDOZ. These projects are encouraged to utilize the County's LID methodology.
3-5
Since redevelopment projects are generally located in highly urbanized areas which may have unique stream and conveyance system problems, the applicant is encouraged to meet with DER prior to concept plan submittal. In order to encourage "Smart Growth" and to maximize benefits to the receiving waters or conveyance system, the Director may waive the above requirements in favor of more site-specific requirements. In accordance with NPDES requirements for Urban Retrofit, the County will designate a watershed each year for which water quality retrofit measures must be provided. The goal is to provide water quality for 10% of the impervious area within the watershed. In order to meet this goal the County may offer incentives to redevelopment projects to provide more than the minimum requirements outlined above. 3.6 Existing Off-site Erosion/Flooding/Conveyance Problems
Off-site areas that are, or could be adversely impacted by stormwater flows shall be considered for improvements in addition to, or instead of, on-site stormwater management controls during the concept review stage. Areas that are currently experiencing erosion, flooding or water quality runoff problems are typical candidates for such improvements. Where off-site stormwater management improvements would be more beneficial than on-site facilities, the developer may be required to provide off-site improvements, at the discretion of DER. Property owners required to provide off-site improvements may be entitled to a reduction in the stormwater management fee and/or the level of on-site stormwater management control otherwise required for their project. The cost of the off-site improvements shall be based on an amount that is determined to be comparable to the cost of on-site controls and/or stormwater management fees for the site in question. This amount is to be determined by DER based on cost estimates developed by the applicant's engineer. The applicant or the applicants engineer may request that DER consider off-site mitigation rather than providing on-site controls. If it can be demonstrated that the proposed off-site improvements are more beneficial to the affected community, then DER will consider the request. However, the primary intent of the off-site mitigation option is to provide an alternative in cases where on-site stormwater management construction is infeasible and no adverse effects downstream would result from a waiver of on-site controls. 3.7 Variances or Modification of Requirements
Variances to the stormwater management requirements may be granted in accordance with Section 4-321 of the Stormwater Management Ordinance (see Appendix 1-1) provided that a written request is submitted to DER by the applicant containing descriptions, drawings, and any other information that is necessary to evaluate the proposed development. This variance request shall address the quantity control requirements and the water quality requirements. The granting of a modification of one type of control function (e.g., quantity control) will not release the applicant from the obligation of the other type of control (e.g. water quality). The cumulative effect of all waivers in a watershed shall be evaluated when such is determined by DER to be appropriate.
3-6
To obtain a modification, the applicant must conclusively demonstrate that: a) The proposed development will not cause an adverse impact on the receiving wetland, watercourse or water body; or b) The site is completely surrounded by existing developed areas which are served by an existing network of public storm drainage systems of adequate capacity to accommodate the runoff from the additional development; or c) Direct tidewater outfalls are controlled so that the drainage area is managed in accordance with County and MDE water quality standards; or d) The hydraulic characteristics of the receiving stream and the watershed, and the water quality and environmental characteristics of the stream and the site, are such that on-site water quantity controls are not necessary to satisfy the objectives of stream channel erosion prevention, and storm replication; or e) No downstream flooding problems will be created or aggravated by future development. Generally, all developments will be required to provide techniques that meet applicable water quality standards consistent with protection and restoration goals of the Chesapeake Bay, Potomac River, and Patuxent River protection programs. All modification requests shall be submitted to DER along with the SWCP Application. Such modification requests shall include supporting documentation as required by DER in sufficient detail to provide for evaluation of the impacts on receiving drainage systems, streams and adjacent properties. 3.8 Public Maintenance versus Private Maintenance 1. Except for low impact development measures (i.e., bioretentive filters) and nonstructural techniques, all storm drains and stormwater management facilities serving residential developments shall be publicly maintained. 2. Storm drains and stormwater management facilities serving one industrial or commercial lot will be privately maintained. 3. Final decision on whether facilities will be private or public will be made by the Director and/or his assigned designee. 4. Prior to plan approval of private storm drains and stormwater management facilities, the Owner will be required to sign and record a Maintenance Agreement. 5. Owners of privately maintained facilities will be required to maintain those facilities, and will be subject to periodic inspection and subsequent enforcement by the County (see Chapter 10). In order for these facilities to perform their intended purpose, they must be properly maintained. It is recommended the Owners begin to plan for maintenance and its associated costs during the Stormwater Concept Phase of the project.
3-7
3.9
Stormwater Hotspots
A stormwater hotspot is defined as a land use or activity that generates higher concentrations of hydrocarbons, trace metals or toxins than are found in typical stormwater runoff. Special attention must be paid to these sites in order to develop management strategies that address the unique problems of these sites. For example, infiltration techniques may not be permitted where groundwater contamination could occur. For more detail refer to Section 2.8, Table 2.6, and Appendix D-6 of the Maryland Stormwater Design Manual. The following land uses and activities are deemed stormwater hotspots: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Vehicle salvage yards and recycling facilities. Vehicle service and maintenance facilities. Vehicle and equipment cleaning facilities. Fleet storage areas (bus, truck, etc.) Some industrial sites. Marinas Outdoor liquid container storage Outdoor loading/unloading facilities Public works storage areas Facilities that generate or store hazardous materials Commercial container nursery Other uses as designated by DER or MDE
3-8
Chapter 4 Stormwater Management Design
CHAPTER 4
4.0 4.1 4.1.1
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN Stormwater Design Plan Criteria General
The Stormwater Management Design Plan must contain all necessary information to support the design which includes as a minimum: record plat, preliminary plan, stormwater concept approval, drainage area map, plan and profile, hydrologic/hydraulic computations, structural computations and drawings for non-standard structures, soil analysis for (utilizing Unified Soil Classification) MD-378 ponds, and infiltration devices, hydraulic gradient profiles and computations, design check list (Appendix 4-1) and all other pertinent data to support the design. Plan sheets submitted shall be no larger than 24 x 36. Four inches of space must be provided on the right-hand border of all sheets for agencys approval stamps. All submittals must have the applicable approval stamps as shown in Appendix 4-15. All other supporting data shall be bound on 8-1/2 x 11 minimum sheet size. The drainage area map, soils analysis and hydraulic computations may be included on the storm drainage drawings or as separate documents. These documents must be suitable for microfilming. All plans and computations should be signed and sealed in accordance with State requirements. 4.1.2 1) Plan Drawings and Documents Submission requirements Submission requirements for technical review and approval of stormwater design are as follows: a) Development Projects submit one copy of each document listed below: Transmittal sheet to include projects name, engineer and owner/developers name and address, reason for sending, submissions content, etc. Copy of an approved stormwater concept letter and plan. Set of bound ancillary design documents to include all pertinent hydraulic/hydrologic computations as applicable. Drainage Study to include drainage area map for existing and proposed conditions indicating flow path used to compute Tc. For more detailed drainage studies, separate drainage area maps may be required for existing and proposed conditions. Set of plan and profile sheets. Copy of landscape plan if applicable.
4-1
Stormwater Management Design Manual -
Copy of storm drain phasing plan (indicate case number for each phase) if applicable. Completed Stormwater Technical Plan Review Submission Checklist (Appendix 4-1) Copy of soil report if applicable. Check, in the amount of review fee, payable to Prince Georges County. All plans, the drainage area map, and computations shall bear the State of Maryland Professional Engineers seal and signature of the engineer who is responsible for the design.
b)
Capital Improvement Projects All County Capital Improvement Project plans are to be submitted in accordance with Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Requirements. All Capital Improvement Projects, that include DER involvement must address stormwater management requirements, and must evaluate the feasibility of utilizing LID techniques.
c)
Changes to Approved Stormwater Technical Plans Any revisions to approved storm drain plans shall be submitted to DER for review and approval prior to construction. A revision fee will be assessed for each revision submission. Revisions must also be coordinated and approved by other reviewing agencies as necessary. The revision submission must include, previously approved plans and revised plans with changes highlighted on both these plans.
d)
All OCS (Office of Central Services) and DPW&T projects are to be submitted in accordance with Prince Georges County Stormwater Management requirements.
2)
DER Review Stormwater Design plans are reviewed on a first-come, first-serve basis. When the technical plan approval is obtained, the next step is to obtain a stormwater construction permit.
3)
Storm Drainage Drawings General Instructions a) Drawings shall be prepared in conformance with the General Drafting Standards (Section 1.3 of this Manual), and shall clearly and concisely indicate all items outlined on the Checklist (Appendix 4-1). The General Notes for Storm Design Construction should be shown on the first sheet of the plans and as a minimum, shall include the following: All storm drains shall be constructed in accordance with the latest edition of the Stormwater Standards and Specifications of Prince Georges County, Department of Environmental Resources, unless otherwise noted. For types of structures refer to the latest Stormwater Management Standard Details, DER (SWMSD), unless otherwise noted.
b)
4-2
Stormwater Management Design Manual -
Information concerning underground utilities was obtained from available records. The contractor must determine the exact locations and elevations of the utilities by digging test pits at all utility crossings well in advance of trenching. If clearances are less than specified, contact the engineer, and the owner of other involved utility before proceeding with construction. All storm drain pipes must have a minimum of 1 foot cover. All inlet top slab front faces shall be painted with the following: Chesapeake Bay Drainage, Dont Dump (Standard Detail 82.0)
c) d) e) 4)
All drawings shall clearly show the construction phasing of the stormwater structures as they relate to the development construction, if applicable. All drawings must include the appropriate Approval Stamps (Appendix 4-15). All drawings must include a title block, project name, consultants information block, owner/developer information block and sheet index (if necessary).
Plan View Clearly indicate on plan view the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) l) m) North Arrow Scale (Min 1" = 50') Pipe size, type and structure number All existing and proposed utilities Soil borings SWM facilities, infiltration trenches, bioretention facilities, nonstructural, and other LID measures Property line of the proposed development, lots and blocks, street name, adjacent property owners name Floodplain, floodplain approval number, and floodplain easement (existing and proposed conditions) Dam breach inundation areas Street rights-of-way County, State, Municipal roads. Provide appropriate legends for existing, proposed, private and public storm drain system Developers and Engineers name, address and telephone number Storm drain/stormwater management facility easements, surface drainage easements, surface drainage easement for streams and channels carrying offsite water, and surface drainage easements for overflow paths
4-3
Stormwater Management Design Manual n) o) p) q) r) s) t) u) v)
Limits of buffers, undisturbed areas, wetland and waters of the U.S. delineation Existing contours and proposed grading for endwalls, headwalls, sump inlets, and overland flow paths Appropriate elevations for low and high points on the road and throat elevations for inlets Distance, bearings, map coordinates, WSSC 200 sheet numbers, zoning information and stormwater concept approval number. Storm drain approval number for existing storm drain system Channelization and positive drainage notes Curve data for curved pipes House locations and grading where overflow path is critical The first sheet of each storm drain plan should contain the following note: MISS UTILITY For location of utilities call 1-800-257-7777 48 hours in advance of any work in this area
w) x) 5)
The first sheet of each storm drain plan should contain lot and block number associated with the Plan. Any other information deemed appropriate
Profile View Clearly indicate on profile the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Q10 Vfull Vactual (@outfalls), S minimum (friction) Type, size, class, slope of pipe, and inverts entering and leaving structures Structure number Head loss in feet, and hydraulic grade line Fill notes Existing and proposed grade Outfall protection detail Bonding agency should be shown by lead arrows Property lines and ROW lines
4-4
Stormwater Management Design Manual j) k) l) m) n) o) 6)
Provide granite block bottom note where the drop in structure is steeper than 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical Indicate pipe which is to be rubber gasketed At all outfalls indicate 10-year and 100-year tailwater elevations Scale should be 1 = 50 horizontal and 1 =5 vertical All existing and proposed utility crossings should be shown with their inverts For SWM facility provide cross section along center line of DAM and along principal spillway (Appendix 4-14a and 4-14b)
Drainage Area Map (DAM) The existing and proposed drainage area maps should be based on the most recent and accurate topographical data available. Field run topography and/or recent aerial photogrammetric topography are required. The following items are required for complete drainage area map: a) The title block should contain the project name, engineers name and address, date prepared, 200-foot sheet number, and grid location. It shall be titled, Drainage Area Map. The scale shall be no less than 1 = 200. Other scales may be used to augment this scale when a large off-site area is involved or to provide clarity of small areas. All proposed SD pipes and structures shall be legible. The DAM must be contained in a 24x36 sheet. The 4-inch Approval/Revision Block on the right hand side is not required. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown throughout the development to provide adequate documentation of drainage divides. Generally, the contour interval shall be in 1 or 2 foot increments. A north arrow shall be clearly visible, preferably in the upper left hand corner of the sheet. All existing and proposed streets pertinent to the drainage system shall be shown with names. Generally locate the vicinity map in the upper right corner. All lots and parcels within the development shall be accurately shown. Owners name and zoning of off-site properties adjacent to the development should be shown with adequate contours to show the drainage direction. The limit of the entire area of proposed development shall be outlined and labeled. Area of Development.
b)
c)
d) e) f) g) h)
4-5
Stormwater Management Design Manual i)
The tributary area to each inlet or subarea shall be clearly delineated by subdrainage divides and flow arrows. The area in acres of every tributary area shall be shown. Each tributary area utilizing the Rational Method shall be labeled with the land use, zoning and runoff coefficient. Composite runoff coefficients for typical developments are listed under Section 4.2.3. Existing and/or technically approved stormwater facilities: These facilities, including all structures and pipe sizes and type, shall be shown with storm drain approval number. The system shall be marked as existing or future. Existing streams and defined swales shall be shown. The 100-year floodplain limits for both existing and proposed conditions of surface drainage courses within and adjacent to the development shall be plotted. All data used to calculate Tc for TR-55 or TR-20 is to be clearly shown and must include at a minimum flow paths, reaches and study points. Each tributary area utilizing TR-55 or TR-20 shall be labeled with the Runoff Curve Number (RCN). The proposed and approved storm drain improvements shall appear on the DAM and must be differentiated from existing facilities. Pipe sizes shall be shown and all structures shall be numbered. Structure numbers on the DAM must agree with the numbers on the storm drain plan. The topography at outlet and entrance structures is crucial and is to show defined flow paths. All structures (such as homes, garages and sheds) and any other pertinent topographic information is to be shown. Any compensatory area for water quantity/quality shall be outlined and clearly identified. The compensatory area must also be clearly referenced in the hydraulic computations. Where inlets or pipe entrances are existing or proposed, the sub-drainage areas are to be delineated and cross-referenced to the computations.
j)
k)
l) m)
n) o) p)
q)
r)
s) 7)
Utility Coordination a) The designer shall coordinate the stormwater design with existing and proposed water, sewer and all other utilities to ensure that there are no conflicts. The location of both existing and future water, sewer and all other utilities are to be shown on the plans and profiles in the area of storm drain construction. Sewer and water house connections shall also be shown on the plan and profile view with adequate information to determine the size of pipe and invert whenever they cross storm drain locations.
4-6
Stormwater Management Design Manual b)
The designer shall be responsible for the research, collection and collation of pertinent data on all proposed utility construction projects, which may impact the drainage design. The designer shall coordinate this data in the development of the design drawings and specifications to avoid conflicts of systems. The designer shall be responsible for obtaining precise locations of all existing utilities and physical features through field surveys and current available records. When directed, the designer shall be responsible for obtaining precise locations by test pits wherever exact locations of underground utilities are critical to the design, or where adjustment during construction would be costly and/or cause significant delay.
c)
8)
Utility Relocation and Protection The designer is responsible for the design of relocation and/or protecting utilities in order to meet the following criteria: a) b) All proposed and existing utilities crossing or parallel to designed storm drain systems shall be shown to scale on the plan view and profile sheets. A minimum vertical clearance of 12 inches and a minimum horizontal clearance of 5 feet, wall to wall, shall be provided between storm drainage lines and other utilities. Exceptions may be granted on a case by case basis when justified. The horizontal angle between storm drain and other utilities at crossings shall not be less than 45 degrees. Stormwater management embankment locations must be free of utility crossings except as noted herein and permitted by DER and WSSC. Proposed dams, which are also utilized as roadway crossings may have small utility lines (8 or less), traversing the dam parallel to the alignment of the roadway. Existing utilities located in the proposed dam embankment area should be removed and re-routed outside the embankment and core trench area. Sewer or water lines, which could possibly permit seeping action along the gravel bedding should be designed to reduce seepage. The use of ductile iron sewer pipe without gravel is encouraged. In addition, anti-seep collars or filter diaphragms will be required in accordance with MD-378 for utilities that are not parallel to the axis of the dam. Sanitary sewer manholes within the pool required for the 2-year design storm will have to be removed or relocated. Sanitary sewer manholes within the 10-year design storm floodpool will have to be rehabilitated, as necessary, to eliminate all significant inflow/infiltration points.
c) d) e)
f) g)
h) i)
4-7
Stormwater Management Design Manual j) k) l)
Sanitary sewer manholes within the 100-year design storm floodpool will have to be rehabilitated, as necessary, to eliminate all significant inflow points. Sanitary sewer pipes under the 2-year design storm floodpool will have to be rehabilitated, as necessary, to eliminate any infiltration points. Outfall Protection where storm drains outfall in the proximity of underground utilities, the designer must provide rip-rap protection extending across the utility ROW. In some instances, pipe extensions over utility crossings may be required by WSSC.
9)
Hydraulic Gradient The hydraulic gradient should be clearly indicated and labeled on all profiles. If deemed necessary for clarity a separate profile sheet should be marked as hydraulic gradient sheet showing the hydraulic gradient line (HGL) in red. If HGL exceeds 1 over the crown of pipe, provide rubber gasket joints. Storm drain pipe should be designed without hydraulic head pressure over and above its maximum design capacity.
10) Structure and Pipe Schedule (see Appendix 4-10a and 4-10b) 4.2 4.2.1 Storm Drain Conveyance Criteria General This part of the County's Design Manual contains physical design criteria to be used in the preparation of storm drain plans. Plans shall clearly show all storm drain construction details, street paving and other improvements, existing or approved storm drains, sanitary sewers, water mains, water and sewer house connections, gas mains, conduits or other utilities, streams, limit of wetland, property lines, easements, rights-ofway, property ownership where applicable, and other pertinent data. 4.2.2 1) Design Criteria Pipe Systems a) All public stormdrain pipes are to be reinforced concrete (RCP), concrete box culvert or concrete arch unless otherwise specified and approved by DER and DPW&T. Flexible pipe materials may be an acceptable alternative on steep slopes. Alternate pipe materials must be approved at the stormwater concept phase. Storm drain pipe for private systems may be corregated metal pipe (CMP), smooth walled CMP, high density polyethylene (HDPE), or other material deemed acceptable by DER. The minimum pipe size inside dimension to be used for any storm drain pipe considered to be a component part of a public storm drainage system shall be 15 inches. Exceptions to this rule will be made for water quality control feeders, inverted elbow pipes, stormwater management low flow openings, and LID culverts and control orifices.
b)
4-8
Stormwater Management Design Manual c)
RCP pipe class is to be in accordance with loading charts (Appendix 4-8). For types and sizes not included in the loading chart and in fabrication standards, design computations are to be submitted for review and approval prior to manufacturing and storm drain permit issuance. All pipes within the road ROW must conform to Class IV or greater. All RCP pipes are to be provided with one-foot minimum cover. A pipe cover chart for RCP (Appendix 4-8) has been included to determine if additional design considerations are necessary. Where necessary, a note on the profile may be required to assure 1 minimum cover over RCP pipe. All flexible pipes are to be provided with a minimum cover of 2'. All pipes and storm drain structures shown on the drawings are to be drawn to scale and accurately depicted on the plan view and profile view. Pipes 27 in diameter and larger may be curved horizontally and vertically. The joint opening is not to exceed 1/3 the length of the tongue, and a note to that effect is to be shown on the plan. All pertinent data is to be shown on the plan; (i.e., radius, chord, tangent, curve length, PC, PT and PI). To enhance self-cleaning characteristics, pipe shall generally not be laid on less than a 1 percent slope. However, if it is documented that 1 percent is not obtainable, then slope may be as low as 0.5 percent for pipes 24 in diameter or larger. When pipe is laid on a slope greater than 20 percent, pipe anchorage should be provided (Standard Detail 100.0). An adequate and safe overflow path for the 100-year storm is to be shown on the plan view even if the path is directly over the pipe. Site plans may be required. Where applicable, proposed grading shall ensure that overflow will be directed to attenuation facilities designed to control the 100-year storm. A detailed cross-section of overflow path and delineation of flow boundaries must be shown where possible building flooding could result. Pipelines parallel to property lines are to be located off the property line to allow for fencing of the property. Provide a minimum 2 offset from the property line from the outside face of the storm drain pipe for such purposes. Generally pipe must be centered in the SD rights-of-way. Storm drainage easements are required for all public systems. Additional construction strips may be required. See Chapter 6, Storm Drain Easements and Rights-of-Way, for additional information. Stationing of the pipe is to be from inside wall to inside wall of inlet and manhole structures, and from outside wall for endwall and headwall, starting at the downstream structure.
d)
e) f) g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
4-9
Stormwater Management Design Manual m)
A pipe schedule tabulating pipe lengths by diameter and class (Appendix 410a) is to be included on the drawings. Public and private systems are to be separated. The authority responsible for bonding must also be indicated for each pipe section and included in the pipe schedule tabulation. In addition, all pipes requiring rubber gaskets must be noted.
2)
Structures Manholes and Inlets Modifications to structures standardized in Prince Georges County Standard Details for Stormwater Management Construction may require structural computations and must be certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Maryland. For Public and Private storm drain systems, DER standard structures are to be used, if possible. MSHA drainage structures are also permissible if DER SWM standard structures are not viable. Any modification to the standard detail will be considered a non-standard structure, which may require a special structural design. The structure dimension must be sealed and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Maryland. a) All structures are to be numbered and listed in the structure schedule (Appendix 4-10b). Information to be included is type, standard detail number, size, top elevation, invert elevation of slot, slot locations, modification notes, and bonding authority. Access structures shall be spaced as follows: 15 24 pipe 27 42 pipe 48 or larger Curved system 400 max 600 max. as necessitated by site conditions 600 max.
b)
Structures should be placed with consideration given for ease of maintenance access. c) d) A minimum drop of 0.1 foot shall be provided through each structure. Through structures are to be provided with a shaped channel. Where the drop on the main line through a structure is greater than that which can be accommodated by a shaped channel with the invert on a one and one-half foot horizontal to one foot vertical slope, the bottom of the structure shall be lined with granite blocks (or approved equivalent) at least four inches thick. No shaped channel shall be required for this type of construction. Field connections of branch lines into the main line pipes may be used only where the main line pipe involved is 27 in diameter or larger (refer to DER Standard Detail 50.0). For the field connection mainline pipes should be as a minimum two times the size of the connecting branch pipe, except for 15 pipe which can be connect to 27 pipe. Connections shall be made at the springline. The centerline of the branch pipe should intersect the centerline of the main line pipe.
e)
f)
4-10
Stormwater Management Design Manual g) h)
Inlet structures that are used to collect grit for infiltration trench pre-treatment must be reinforced concrete. Yard inlets must show the 10-year and 100-year ponding limits. A ponding depth of not more than 2 feet is allowed from the throat or grate to the 100year storm elevation (assuming 100% blockage) or to the 100-year overflow. Additional structures may be required on steep slopes to reduce excessive pipe depths and/or to provide deliberate drops in the main line to facilitate safe conveyance to a proper outfall discharge point. In order to provide an outfall at a suitable slope (i.e., less than 5 percent slope), drop structures may need to be utilized to reduce the velocity before discharging onto a rip-rap area. Curb inlets located on cul-de-sacs shall have a maximum 10 linear feet opening, and a safe overflow path. Sufficient contours are to be shown around yard inlets to ensure that positive drainage to the inlet is obtained. Sump inlets shall have a note on the plan view stating provide positive drainage to the inlet. Generally, yard inlets are to be avoided on residential lots. All reasonable efforts shall be made to grade lots toward the front or the rear in order to avoid placing yard inlets in the lot. Street inlets in sump areas shall be located at the lowest point of the street grade. Additional capacity is to be provided to allow for interception of flow that bypass other inlets due to system blockage. Normally, sump inlets shall be five feet greater than required for interception of design flows when inlets are located at the low point. Use A inlets at the low point. Street inlets in sump areas shall provide spread analysis. Where two or more pipes enter a concrete structure, a 6" minimum horizontal clearance must be maintained between the pipes connected to the structure at the same elevation. For masonry structures the minimum horizontal clearance shall be 12". Non-standard inlets require special structural design review and approval by DER. All precast structures require shop drawing approval by DER. For commercial/industrial areas, inlets are to be kept a minimum of 5 feet away from driveway P.C. (point of curve) or P.T. (point of tangent) of curb fillet to avoid repeated loadings by turning vehicles. The determination of the minimum width of a structure based on incoming pipes is based on the following formula (see Appendix 4-9): W = D/sinO + T/tanO Where: D = Pipe diameter (outside) T = Inlet wall thickness W = Min. structure width (inside) O = Angle of pipe entering structure
i)
j) k)
l)
m)
n) o)
p)
4-11
3)
Headwalls (Pipe Entrance) and Endwalls (Pipe Outfall) a) Entrances and outfalls are not to be located on developed lots except in extreme circumstances with special permission from DER. (See Section 3.2.2.c). Headwalls and Endwalls located on offsite property require easements. Topographical information is to be shown on the plan view to show drainage path(s) to and from the structures. The limits of ponding for 10 and 100 year storms are to be delineated for existing and proposed conditions at all headwalls. Maximum ponding elevation shall be delineated. Assume full blockage when no overflow path or pipe blockage protection is provided. The channel invert and top of banks of the incoming and receiving drainage course(s) are to be shown on the plan and profile views. Rip-rap is to be provided to protect against erosion, however excessive use of rip-rap should be avoided in order to reduce stream warming. For pipe sizes < 21 diameter, provide a minimum rip-rap apron length of 5 feet. For pipes larger than 21 diameter, provide a minimum rip-rap apron of 10 feet. Transition of the rip-rap section to the natural section is to be shown. Rip-rap shall be underlain with an approved filter cloth. Rip-rap outfalls for pipes 18" diameter and greater must provide a grouted cut-off wall (unless a plunge pool is utilized-Appendix 4-11c). Rip-rap outalls for 15" diameter pipes with partial flow depth, may not require grouted cut-off walls. Rip-rap outfalls are also subject to PGSCD revision and approval. A standard endwall/headwall or flared end section is to be used when there is no foreseen future extension of the storm drain pipe. A cutoff wall may be used when future extension of the system is anticipated. The structure shall be located sufficiently beyond the proposed development so that regrading will not be required within existing development when the system is extended in the future. Generally, for entrance structures with drainage areas greater than 20 acres, flows must be computed using TR-20 or TR-55 method. Rational method can be used for drainage areas 20 acres and less. Endwall/headwalls or flared end sections shall be located a minimum distance of 4 feet from the property line or as necessary to provide a 3:1 surface grade to the property line whichever is greater. A 4 high fence shall be provided on endwall/headwall structures or on flared end sections when the drop from the top of the proposed structure is greater than 48 to the invert of the storm drain pipe. The fence shall be anchored to the structure by using non-shrink grouting (Standard Detail 40.0).
b) c)
d) e)
f) g)
h)
i)
j)
4-12
Stormwater Management Design Manual k)
A minimum right of way is to be provided 5 feet beyond the structures rip-rap improvement. If conditions warrant, greater easement areas may be necessary to facilitate maintenance of the outfall area. Access points to areas should be provided. Endwall/headwalls on M-NCPPC property require separate approval from MNCPPC prior to the second review by DER. Rip-rap shall not be placed on channels that have a longitudinal grade greater than 10 percent. Slopes greater than 10% slope require the use of gabions or other materials that are determined to be acceptable to DER and PGSCD. Class II (minimum d50 = 12") rip-rap shall be used at outfalls for pipes 30 and larger in diameter.
l) m)
n) 4)
Designed Open Channels and Natural Streams a) Channel invert and tops of banks are to be shown in profile views. Existing ground elevation at both banks and existing centerline elevations should be shown in profile. For designed channels, a cross-sectional view of each change of configuration shall be shown. The limits of existing and proposed 100-year floodplain easement or surface drainage easement conveying the 100-year flow shall be shown. The easement must be acceptable and approved by DER. A DER floodplain letter must be obtained prior to release of the storm drain permit. A 50 minimum buffer shall be maintained between a residential buildable lot line and 100-year floodplain or as approved on the stormwater concept plan. For designed channels, a transition area at the entrance and outfall is to be clearly shown on plan and profile views. Contours of the existing or proposed channel must adequately delineate the extent of the channel configuration. Limits and types of bank protection are to be shown on the plan and profile views. For natural channels, sufficient easement and bank protection is required to ensure the channel will remain within the easement and as delineated on the plan view. Channels with 10 percent or greater slope should be lined with gabions or other material deemed acceptable to DER and PGSCD. For all channels with 10 percent or greater slopes, 3 grouted gabion or concrete cutoff walls must be provided at horizontal intervals equal to the ratio of the cutoff wall height to the slopes of the channel (i.e. 3/0.1 = 30).
b) c)
d) e)
f)
4-13
4.2.3
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Computations for Design Conveyance Systems
The computations shall be based on a 10-year design storm unless circumstances make consideration of another intensity storm criteria appropriate. Computations are to be bound, signed and sealed by Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Maryland. The computations shall contain the following items to fully substantiate the design and should be tabulated as per Appendix 4-3. 1) Quantity of Stormwater Runoff for a Drainage Area Generally, the Rational Formula is to be used for drainage areas less than 20 acres and TR-55 or TR-20 are to be used for drainage areas greater than 20 acres. Road crossing culverts, which require 100-year capacity are required to utilize TR-55 or TR20. The Rational Formula is: Q = CIA; Where: Q = Quantity of stormwater runoff (cubic fee per second) C = Runoff coefficient I = Rainfall intensity (inches per hour) A = Tributary area (acres) a) In computing flow at any point under consideration, the runoff coefficient shall be a composite of the ultimate development C factors for all areas tributary to the point of study. C factors for development shall represent a weighted average based upon the proportion of the surface area covered by impervious materials and by lawns. Generally, storm drain systems shall be designed to safely convey the ultimate development 10-year storm discharge. Composite C factors for typical developments are listed below and are suggested for general use:
ZONE C I R-P-H R-10 R-H R-20 R-30 R-T R-35 R-80 R-55 RR RA RE OS DEVELOPMENT Commercial Industrial Garden Type Apartments Schools, Churches Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Rural Residential Rural Agricultural Residential Estate Open Space 7% OR LESS 0.85 0.60-0.85 0.60-0.85 0.60-0.85 0.60-0.85 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 STEEPER THAN 7% 0.85 0.70-0.85 0.70-0.85 0.70-0.85 0.70-0.85 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.30
4-14
b)
For a 100-year design storm, add 0.10 to listed factor. It should be noted that in areas where Marlboro Clay outcrops or other clays with a high shrink/swell potential exist, special design capacity above the 10-year storm will be required. See Appendix 4-12a for more design considerations for Marlboro Clay areas. Composite C factors other than above may be used if support documentation is provided. The C factors shall be computed using the following values: Impervious areas Lawns and grass areas - Slopes 7% or flatter - Slopes greater than 7% Wooded areas Wetland areas 0.90 0.25 0.35 0.20 0.18
c)
d)
I depends upon the time of concentration and the storm frequency used. The time of concentration (Tc) is the period of time required for the water to flow from the most distant point within the tributary area to the point under consideration. The time of concentration to each study point may be computed using TR-55 except for the first 400 of flow path for developed conditions. The maximum travel time for the first 400 feet is 10 minutes for residential developments and 5 minutes for commercial and industrial developments. Using the computed time of concentration, the intensity can be determined from the Rainfall Intensity Chart. (see Appendix 4-2).
e) 2)
The 100 year overflow must always be analyzed. A detailed analysis will be required where structures and property may be impacted. The overflow must be examined using one of the following methods as appropriate. a) TR-55 or TR-20 b) When a floodplain study is required upstream of the storm drain system for the development. A floodplain study is required on watersheds > 50 acres. Existing and future culverts not to be extended must use TR-55 or TR-20 analysis.
Rational Method In cases where a floodplain study is not required for a development the rational method can be used to analyze the 100-year overflow.
3)
The following criteria must be observed when using TR-55 or TR-20: a) b) Sheet flow lengths of 100 or less must be used. When computing the travel time for sheet flow, use 24-hour rainfall for the 2year storm. Maximum 'n' value should be 0.40.
4-15
Stormwater Management Design Manual c) d) 4.2.4
Runoff curve number computations must be provided along with a soil survey map and a zoning map of the drainage area. Indicate on TR-20 output 10- and 100-year peak discharges at all study points.
Design of Conveyance System
The conveyance system is to be designed for ultimate peak discharge from a 10-year design storm. When there is no provision for an adequate and safe overflow path, it shall be designed for 100-year storm flow. If the overflow passes over a Marlboro Clay area, the system should be designed for 100-year storm flow and must be gasketted pipe. 1) Mannings equation shall be used to design the conveyance system: Q = 1.486 AR2/3 S1/2 n Where: Q = Quantity of stormwater runoff (cubic feet per second) n = roughness coefficient (based on wetted perimeter) A = cross-sectional area of flow (square feet) R = hydraulic radius (feet) S = friction slope (ft. per ft.) of conveyance system a) The roughness coefficient to be used shall be as follows: Concrete pipe and precast culverts Monolithic concrete in boxes, channels, etc. Structural plate pipe, pipe arches and arches (with 2 corrugations) Corrugated Aluminum Pipe (angular) Corrugated Aluminum Pipe (helical) 15 to 21 24 to 36 42 and larger Smooth walled CMP PVC and HDPE Corrugated metal pipes with asphalt coating and paved inverts (with corrugations) 0.013 0.015 0.030 0.025 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.013 0.011 0.019
Sodded channels where depth of water is less than 1.5 feet 0.050 Sodded channel where depth of water is greater than 1.5 feet 0.035 Smooth earth channel or the bottom of wide channels with sodded slopes 0.025 Rip-rap channels Varies (see App. 4-11a)
4-16
Where drainage systems are composed of more than one of the above mentioned materials, a composite roughness coefficient must be determined in proportion to the wetted perimeter of the different materials. 2) 3) The minimum hydraulic slopes shall appear in the computations. Inclusion of the actual design pipe slope is required. Inlets shall be sized so as to intercept a minimum of 70 percent of the flow. Inlet computations are to be presented in a tabulated form showing the time of concentration, intensity and flow to each inlet (including bypass from other inlets), size of inlet, slope of street, capacity of inlet, and bypass to other inlets. For curb opening inlets, use the street capacity graphs (Appendix 4-7). For yard inlets, assume 50% blockage, to determine capacity. B inlets shall not be used when intercepted flow is in excess of 15 cfs. Curb inlets located in a sump area have a maximum capacity of 7.5 cfs per five linear feet of opening. Inlets that are located in sump areas that would receive overflows from other areas in the event of the large storms or system malfunction are to be provided with an additional five linear foot opening over that required to intercept design flow. Use A inlets at low points. Water shall not cross the centerline of the street or exceed the width or depth permitted by DPW&T. The flow across intersections or at the end of terminal streets is not to exceed 3 cfs. Head loss computations are to be tabulated and should preferably be of the form: a) HL = V2(outlet) VR2 + SL 2g VR = Q(Vcos a/2) (Inlet1) + Q(Vcos a/2) (Inlet 2) + Q(outlet) where; HL = Head loss in the structure VR = Resultant velocity SL = Minimum structure loss a = (180 degrees) (angle between the inlet and outlet pipes) V = Velocity in pipe (min.) If VR > V(outlet) than HL = SL b) A minimum structure loss for inlets, manholes and other special design structures is to be added to the head loss in accordance with the following: V = 2/sec or less ; SL = 0.00 V = 3/sec or less ; SL = 0.05 V = 4/sec or less ; SL = 0.10 V = 5/sec or less ; SL = 0.15 V = 6/sec or less ; SL = 0.20 V = greater than 6/sec ; SL = 0.25 where V = velocities leaving the structure.
4)
5)
6)
4-17
Stormwater Management Design Manual c)
Head Loss at field connections is to be computed like those at structures, eliminating the structure loss. The angular loss coefficient, cos (a/2) is assumed to be 1.
7) 8)
Headwater computations for entrance structures must be provided. The use of Bureau of Public Roads charts or HY8 is recommended. (Appendix 4-13). For the purpose of design of suitable energy dissipaters at the outfall, the partial flow velocity based on the actual slope of the proposed outlet pipe is to be computed (Appendix 4-20). Computations must be furnished to substantiate that the velocity onto sodded/seeded or existing ground is reduced to 5 feet per second in cut and 4 feet per second on fill (lower velocities may be necessary depending on soil and grass type). Where the grade beyond the outfall is steeper, causing flow velocities to increase beyond 5 feet per second, additional conveyance protection, i.e., rip-rap or gabions, is to be provided unless documentation is provided showing that the type of vegetation and soil is sufficiently erosionresistant. Computations must be furnished for all channels, accompanied by a typical section of each reach, and a plan view with reach locations clearly marked. In the case of existing streams or swales remaining in a natural condition, field run data is necessary although cross-sections may be approximated for the purpose of computation. Designed channel shall contain the designated storm flow with a 12 minimum freeboard. Velocity computations that reflect the average slope, cross-section, roughness and quantity of flow must be provided for each reach. The design storm usually used for open channels is the 10-year storm. Velocities in sodded grass channels must be such that erosion will not occur. Necessary erosion protection must be provided. Minimum and maximum longitudinal slope for sodded grass channel shall be 2% and 4% respectively (except where utilized for LID or nonstructural practices), and for a concrete channel the minimum slope shall be 0.5%. Natural streams must be stable and be expected to remain stable under ultimate development of the watershed. A description of the present condition of the stream including soil types, vegetation and condition is to be provided. A comparison of existing and ultimate flow quantities and velocities is to be provided. An analysis of erosion potential after ultimate development of the watershed is to be provided. Bioengineering techniques, gabions, or rip-rap protection may be necessary unless it can be shown that the bank material and vegetation are sufficiently erosionresistant to withstand ultimate watershed development flows and that the channel will remain within the floodplain easement throughout the projected life of the development. When stream channels are protected with rip-rap or gabions, a grouted cutoff wall must be provided at the upstream and downstream ends of the protected area to help control undermining. Where outfalls extend into a stream channel, the rip-rap stone sizing must consider the stream channel velocities as well as the expected outfall velocities. The correct size of stone to use would be the larger of the two sizes.
9)
10)
11)
12)
4-18
Stormwater Management Design Manual 13)
Water Openings for Culverts and Bridges a) Culvert computations will consist of data similar to that used for sizing pipe systems. Use SCD pond criteria for roadway culverts when headwater is more than 2 x pipe size for the 100-year storm and Hw-Tw is greater than 10 (see MD-378 App. B) and when headwater is more than 1.5 x pipe size for nonroadway culverts. The culvert shall pass the 100-year storm flow with one foot of freeboard to the top of the road. No adverse impacts are permitted on the upstream properties. Culverts may also require a permit and plan approval from DPW&T. DER will approve all bridges and culverts for hydraulics, hydrology and scour protection. DPW&T will review the foundation and structural integrity. Each department requires a separate permit.
b)
14)
A hydraulic gradient for the design storm shall be computed and plotted. This gradient is to take into consideration friction losses in the pipe and channels, computed structure losses (Appendix 4-4), tailwater conditions and entrance losses. All enclosed systems shall be designed so that they will generally operate without building up a surcharged hydrostatic head under design flow conditions. The designer is encouraged to maintain a HGL, which does not exceed 1 foot over the crown of the pipe. Pipes having a HGL over one foot above the pipe crown will require rubber gaskets.
4.3 4.3.1
Infiltration Devices General
Infiltration systems shall be designed in accordance with the MDE Design Manual. The manual is available through the State of Maryland, MDE. Infiltration facilities shall also meet the following guidelines and criteria: 1) Field Investigation a) b) c) d) To be done by boring or open excavation. Soil description to include all soil horizons. Soil texture to be identified according to USDA soil classification. Soil boring depth shall extend a sufficient distance below the bottom of the proposed trench to determine groundwater conditions. The required water table buffer (seasonally variable; see Appendix 4-12b) or at least 4-feet below the bottom of the trench, whichever is greater. Ground water elevation to be recorded at time of boring and after 24 hours. Based on this information, the seasonal high ground water table shall be determined.
e)
4-19
Stormwater Management Design Manual 2) Detailed Laboratory and Field Tests a) b)
Grain-size sieve analysis and hydrometer tests where appropriate are required to determine USDA classification. Insitu infiltration tests may be used to determine infiltration rate by one of the following methods if desired: Health Department Constant Test (perc. test) Flooding basin Cylinder Infiltrometer Air entry permeator
c) d) e) f) 3)
Soil boring locations to correspond to location of proposed infiltration trenches. A minimum of one boring for every 5000 ft2 of infiltration trench. Soil boring location stakes to be left in the field for inspection purposes. Soils investigation to be performed by licensed soils or geotechnical engineer.
Infiltration trenches are not permitted in the vicinity of Marlboro Clays or other clays with a high shrink/swell potential as identified in the soil survey or from field investigations. Check geological information for presence of Marlboro Clays. Trench Design Criteria
4.3.2
1) 2) 3)
Infiltration systems shall be located at least 25 feet, horizontal distance, from basement walls. Infiltration depth from final grade to bottom of trenches shall not exceed 12'. Infiltration systems designed to handle runoff from commercial or industrial impervious parking areas shall be a minimum of 100 feet from any water supply well. An observation well is required for each trench. Add the following note to the plans: "Infiltration systems shall not receive runoff until the entire contributory drainage area to the infiltration system is permanently stabilized." All infiltration systems must be identified on the stormwater concept plan and must be protected from sediment throughout the development. Soil borings must indicate depth to seasonal high water table and bedrock, if any. Minimum acceptable distance from bottom of trench to water table 4.0. Generally, soil borings shall be located within the infiltration facility boundary and shown on the SWM plan view sheet. In addition, soil suitability shall be fieldverified at the time of installation. Notes shall be provided indicating infiltration construction specifications. See MDE SWM Design Manual for notes.
4) 5)
6) 7)
8)
4-20
Storm drain ROWs are to be provided in accordance with the easement and rightsof-way chapter for public systems. Infiltration facilities to be placed within road ROWs must obtain DPW&T approval.
10) Provide a 6 layer of clean, washed sand in place of filter fabric on the bottom of the trench; (Note: This area is not to be included in the trench volume computations.) 11) All dimensions of the trench shall be shown on the detail sheet. Provide adequate information, inverts, elevations and dimension as necessary for all pipes and trenches. 12) Provide approved filter cloth on top and sides of trench. 13) A minimum of 5 horizontal distance shall be maintained between a utility line and infiltration trench. No utility line should be placed over, under or within infiltration trench. 14) The infiltration trench shall not be placed in an area where the bottom or side of the trench are in fill. 15) The infiltration trench shall not be placed on slopes greater than 20%. When the trench is placed on a slope, the trench should be a minimum of 25' horizontally away from the proposed grade. An adequate overflow shall be provided to ensure a non-erosive outfall in the event of clogging. 16) The infiltration trench should not be provided at a location which could cause water problems in down grade properties. 17) Trenches shall be filled with 1-1/2 to 3 washed bank-run gravel or Md. #2 or #3 double-washed crushed bluestone. Bluestone must be obtained from an approved supplier. 18) Maximum allowable void ratio is 0.40. 19) Infiltration structures shall not be placed upstream of Marlboro Clay or other unstable soils. 20) Locations of trenches shall be shown on plan view and profile of the storm drain plans, and on erosion and sediment control plans. 21) Trench depth should be such that it will drain within 48 hours, with a maximum depth of 15 feet. 22) Surface drainage systems require pretreatment prior to runnoff entering the trench. 23) Infiltration trenches shall not be utilized as an integral part of the main conveyance system. If the trench runoff is received via a storm drainage system, the trench must generally be located off-line. An off-line trench shall be connected to an inlet structure that has a sump chamber with minimum depth of 3 below the trench inlet pipe.
4-21
24) The invert of the outfall discharge pipe shall be higher than the invert of the infiltration feeder pipe by the head plus pipe diameter of feeder pipe required for the peak inflow into the infiltration trench. 25) Plans should specify the perforation spacing and sizing with the minimum total area > 5x the cross-sectional area of the feeder pipe in the trench. 26) The minimum allowable infiltration rate is 0.52 inches/hour. 27) Whenever feasible, infiltration systems shall include pretreatment techniques to prevent clogging. 28) Infiltration trench feeder pipes shall be blocked until all contributing drainage areas have been completely stabilized. 4.3.3 Infiltration Computations The following computations shall be provided: 1) 2) Trench volume should be computed utilizing the MDE Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria (Chapter 2.0 of the MDE Design Manual) Maximum trench depth should be computed to allow complete drainage within 48 hours.
4.4 4.4.1
Hydrodynamic Water Quality Separators General
Hydrodynamic separators may be used to enhance water quality from small commercial areas when the preferred water quality measures have been proven infeasible. Hydrodynamic separators may be applicable in areas where heavy automobile traffic and/or parking lots contribute large loads of oil, grit and trash to runoff water. Hydrodynamic separators may only be utilized on private storm drain systems. Hydrodynamic separators may only be utilized for pretreatment, retrofit projects, or redevelopment projects. 4.4.2 1) 2) Design Procedures Size the structure according to the manufacturer's design methods. Show the hydraulic gradient through each chamber of the structure based on the 10year storm. Assume that the velocity head is zero and the gradient will be at the water surface. The hydraulic gradient shall not be higher than the proposed grade. Provide one foot of freeboard from the HGL to the top slab. Hydrodynamic Separator Notes
All of the following notes shall be shown on the plan:
4-22
Stormwater Management Design Manual 1) General Notes: a) b)
Refer to manufacturers specifications for material and methods of construction. Wall thickness shall be as follows: Minimum of 6 inches thick for the first 8-0 of depth, 12-inch thick walls between 8-0 and 12-0 of depth and 16 inch thick walls for depth greater than 12-0. Variations in thickness can be accepted if structural computations are certified by a professional engineer. Depth to be measured from top of top slab to top of bottom slab.
c) d) e) 2)
All pre-cast structures must have shop drawings approved by DER prior to fabrication. When the structure is subject to traffic loading, reinforcing shall be designed for the appropriate traffic loads. Manhole covers shall be provided with adequate locking devices.
Construction Notes a) b) Silt and debris shall not be allowed to enter the structure until the contributing drainage area has been permanently stabilized. All openings to the structure shall be protected by the appropriate sediment control measures during construction. (see Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.)
3)
Inspection Notes a) The DPW&T or DER inspection must be called (301) 883-5390 48 hours in advance of the beginning of construction of water quality control structures and for final inspection.
4)
Maintenance Notes a) Water Quality Structures will require periodical cleaning. Owners of these facilities will have to clean them as needed or on a frequency that the County determines appropriate but minimally on a semi-annual basis. Owners of a water quality structure will be notified by the County of the frequency of maintenance. Maintenance of these facilities will consist of cleaning out the separator and disposal of the waste and repair of the facility as needed. Periodic inspection of these facilities will be made by DER.
b)
4-23
Stormwater Management Design Manual 4.5 4.5.1
Stormwater Management Ponds and Stormwater Wetlands General
All stormwater management facilities are to be reviewed and approved by DER prior to a permit release. In addition, basins and ponds may also need approval from MDE Dam Safety Division, PGSCD, WSSC and/or MNCP&PC. The designer is responsible for making sure that their design complies with all agency criteria and that the information submitted to those agencies is the same. 4.5.2 1) Design Criteria Public Stormwater Management Measures: Public stormwater management measures are those within the publicly maintained drainage system whose primary function is stormwater management. All developments with multi-lot residential properties are considered to be in this category. Private Stormwater Management Measures: Private stormwater management measures are those which are not an integral part of the publicly maintained drainage system and serve only one property. Stormwater Management ponds with tributary areas 640 acres or greater, dam height 20' or greater (measured from the lowest point on the top of dam to the lowest point on the upstream toe), or intermediate or high hazard dams, must be approved by MDE Dam Safety Division. Stormwater Management ponds and stormwater wetlands shall meet the requirements of the MDE Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria (Chapter 2.0 of the MDE Design Manual) for Water Quality Volume (WQv), Recharge Volume (Rev) and Channel Protection Storage (Cpv). Attenuation of the 10-year storm may be required if the downstream infrastructure and/or conveyance system has inadequate capacity to handle the 10-year storm. The Engineer is responsible for providing the capacity analysis. Attenuation of the 100-year storm may be necessary to control flooding downstream. When 100-year attenuation is required care must be taken to make sure the 100year overflow paths are directed to the stormwater management facility. The overflow may need to be contained within a surface drainage easement to be recorded with DER. Facilities with permanent pools may not be located so as to discharge to Class III or IV Trout Waters identified in COMAR 26.08.02, Environmental Article 9. A ten-foot wide, access road shall be provided from an existing public Rights-OfWay. The access road shall be constructed of bituminous asphalt or grass pavers when located adjacent to residential lots. Other locations may be constructed with gravel. Access roads may not be located on developed lots. The access must be contained within the SWM Rights-Of-Way. A minimum of 25 dedication is required
2)
3)
4)
5)
6) 7)
8) 9)
4-24
for the access road from the street to the SWM easement. A driveway apron should be placed at the public road for access. A gate shall be provided when deemed appropriate by DER. The gate should be located so as to discourage unwanted access, yet be unobtrusive. 10) Easements or dedications are required for public facilities and maintenance agreements are required for private facilities. (See Chapter 6 for easement information.) Riser structures must be reinforced concrete. Outfall pipes must be round, reinforced concrete pipe with rubber gasket joints meeting ASTM C-361, or must be cast-in-place concrete box culverts. a) b) c) Outflow pipes require a concrete cradle within the embankment area. Provide a concrete cradle detail. Anti-seep collars and filter diaphragms are to be provided in accordance with MD-378 requirements. Drop inlet spillways are to have adequate anti-vortex devices. An anti-vortex device is not required if weir control is maintained in the riser through all flow stages. Risers designs will require structural review if nonstandard design. The riser/barrel connection shall be water-tight and sealed by using proper water stops. The release opening shall be no smaller than 6-inch diameter orifice. If a smaller orifice area is required, provide a 6 or larger valve with valve partially closed to provide the required area or provide a removable 6" or larger cap with the correct orifice size drilled or cut into the cap. The orifice may be no smaller than 3" in diameter. The orifice must be protected by a trash rack or hood which is capable of preventing the orifice from blocking. Anti-seep collars shall be placed a minimum of 2.0 feet from pipe joints. The first pipe joint must be located within 4.0 feet from the riser. Anti-seep collars and pipe connections with the riser shall be water tight.
11)
d) e) f)
g) h) i) 12) 13) 14)
All slopes including the dam embankment are to be 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical maximum (3:1). Stormwater management ponds and stormwater wetlands, should be designed utilizing 1-foot or 2-foot contour interval topo. All dams require a minimum of a 4 deep core trench below the existing ground in accordance with MD-378. Note: Where necessary or as determined by the soils engineer, the core trench may need to be extended to reach suitable material as
4-25
determined in the MD-378. Plans must clearly indicate the limits of the core trench in plan and profile. a) b) 15) Fill material for the center of the embankment and cutoff/core trench shall conform to Unified Soil Classification Gc, Sc, Ch, or Cl. Off-site borrow or spoil areas must have an approved and active sediment control plan.
For dry basins passing a continuous stream flow, the vegetated floor is to have a 2 percent minimum slope to direct the flow toward the riser area. A rip-rap pilot channel is to be provided to prevent erosion of the facility. Appropriate vegetation is to be provided along the pilot channel to allow for temperature reduction. Soil boring locations are to be shown on the plan view, profile and cross-section of the centerline of dam. Generally, if the design includes a permanent pool, a pond drain capable of draining the pond (to a depth of 1') within a 24-hour time period shall be provided. Exceptions can be made for shallow marsh ponds where outfall conditions do not permit a drain to be installed, and where adequate safety measures are taken. a) Valve controls should be located either inside the riser at a location where they will not normally be inundated, and can be operated in as safe manner, or on top of the riser.
16) 17)
18)
For all basins, the assumed phreatic line shall be drawn at a four horizontal to one vertical slope from the intersection of the 10 year W.S.E.L. and the embankment to the invert of the outflow pipe. Stormwater management riser structure openings shall be protected from clogging by trash racks. a) The dimensions of trash rack openings shall be no larger than 1/2 the dimension of the barrel conduit diameter. The minimum dimensions will be not less than 6 inches (per MD-378). For ponds located on line, in forested floodplains, the trash rack on the low flow opening shall have 6 times the cross-sectional area of the low flow opening. For ponds with only storm drain inflows the area can be reduced to 3 times the area of the low flow opening. Computations must indicate that the criteria is met. Vertical bars shall be located outside of horizontal bars. The trash rack shall project out a minimum of 12 from the riser or weir wall. The reinforcing bars used in the fabrication of a trash rack shall be sized according to the design. However, in no case shall bars less than (#4) be utilized. All trash racks shall be painted with a nontoxic, rust inhibiting battleship gray paint to prevent corrosion.
19)
b)
c) d) e)
4-26
Stormwater Management Design Manual f)
Generally, for basins with permanent pools, provide a hood or inverted elbow over the orifice opening to prevent oils and other floatable objects from leaving the pond. The hood should extend at least 12 inches below the surface of the permanent pool. Be sure that adequate clearance is provided below the inverted elbow to avoid blockage (minimum 1)
20) 21)
Provide sections, details and profiles of the SWM embankment, with pertinent supporting information. For basins with maintenance benches, all storm drain outfalls must be located beyond the bench and next to the permanent pool. The bench may be elevated to allow for the pipe crossing with a 1 minimum cover for the pipe crossing. MD-378 specifications should be provided on stormwater management plan as per Appendix 4-16. Sediment forebays shall be provided at major inflow points. a) b) c) d) Forebay shall be sized to contain 0.1 inches per impervious acre of contributing drainage area. The forebay storage volume counts toward the total WQv requirements. Exit velocities from forebays shall be non-erosive. A defined barrier should be provided between the forebay and the main body of the pond.
22) 23)
24)
Safety Considerations The subsection of the Prince Georges County Stormwater ordinance (616.9.2) 625.9.2, titled Other bodies of water, is added to read as follows: When a fish pond or other body of water such as a stormwater management wet-, dry- or extendeddetention pond deeper than twenty-four (24) inches is located within a densely populated area, or in the proximity of an elementary school, playground or other areas where small children may congregate without adult supervision, the building official may require a protective enclosure of such body of water as described in Section (616.9) 625.9 of this Code; except where allowed under the County approved stormwater management pond plans, standards and specifications. a) Wet Basins The following safety features are to be incorporated into the design of a wet basin: Generally, a vegetative buffer zone, 50 in width, must be provided where residential lots are in close proximity to the basin. This area will provide a physical vegetative barrier to prevent open access to the basin. This buffer area may be planted (see vegetative guidelines) or may be left in a natural state according to the landscape criteria Section 4.6.5. If the buffer area has to be excavated, it must be graded to a slope of not less than 2.5%
4-27
and not greater than 20% (5:1). Generally, no residential lots are to be allowed in the buffer area. A 10' wide bench is to be provided 1 3 above the normal pool suitable for access for maintenance and emergency vehicles and serve as a safety feature. This bench should have a minimum slope of 2% toward the slope of normal pool. The bench should be stabilized with 6" of 2" 4" bluestone, 6" of CR6 or other acceptable material. For wet ponds deeper than 2, an underwater safety bench is to be provided extending a minimum of 5 into the normal pool. This bench shall be on a flat grade of 2% and shall be 6 to 1 below the normal pool elevation and extend around the entire perimeter of the pool, except at the control structure. This bench area shall be planted with wetland vegetation (see vegetative guidelines) to act as a physical barrier restricting access to the pool. No trees or woody plants are allowed on the embankment or within 15 of the toe of embankment or within 25 of the control structure or on the maintenance access road. Landscaping of the basin will be required and the landscape plan must be a part of the approved technical plan. Trees may be planted within the buffer or basin area according to the landscape criteria in Section 4.6.5. The control structure should be incorporated into the dam embankment. Some fencing may be required around the structure depending on the design. Ponds shall be designed in accordance with the applicable safety standards discussed above, and not rely on fencing for safety. Fencing may be installed around private ponds by the owner, but such fencing may not be used in lieu of adherence to the pond safety design standards and guidelines.
b)
Extended Detention Basin These basins shall incorporate the same safety features as wet basins with the following exceptions: The 5' wide safety bench shall be placed 6 to 12 below the designed extended detention elevation (except for natural contour ponds that would require clearing of trees and natural vegetation). When landscaping the basin, plants which are tolerant to wet conditions shall be planted within the extended detention ponding area. Benching will not be required for basins with extended detention depth averaging less than 2 across the floor.
4-28
Stormwater Management Design Manual c) Special Consideration -
When fencing is necessary, vegetative screening may also be required. For large multi-use facilities when recreation is planned, additional safety features may be required as necessary to make the facility suitable for the intended use.
d)
Forebays
The following general requirements should be followed: For forebays deeper than 2, there should be a 5 wide bench at maximum of 2% slope surrounding the forebay area to be used for wetland plantings. The bench should be at depth of 6-12 below the permanent pool elevation. Safety and wetland plantings must be considered in the design.
25)
Maintenance Considerations a) Vehicle access is to be provided to the control structure, forebay and to the outflow pipe. A 12 wide gate and driveway apron is to be provided. Provide turnarounds where appropriate, preferably near the riser structure. Public maintenance of facilities located on private property will be limited to maintaining hydraulic functions of the facility. The property owner, if desired, must perform aesthetic maintenance. Where the facility is to be on land owned by a Homeowners Association, aesthetic maintenance responsibilities will be included in the associations charter.
b)
4.5.3 1)
Hydrologic & Hydraulic Computations for Stormwater Management Stormwater management measures are to be designed to achieve the requirements stated in the approved SWCP or Facility Planning Study. Computations supporting the design are to be submitted using TR-55; TR-20; or other methods approved for use by DER, MDE and PGSCD as appropriate. Computations should include: a) b) c) d) e) f) Summary of stormwater management design including description of method used, summary discharge table and copy of conceptual approval. Zoning map Soil survey map Runoff curve number and time of concentration (Tc) computations using TR-55 Unified Sizing Criteria Volumes Design storm inflow/outflow hydrographs using TR-20. diagram for TR-20 run for complex models. Provide schematic
4-29
Stormwater Management Design Manual g) h)
Stage vs. storage table and graph (Appendix 4-14c&d) Stage vs. discharge table and graph, equations and references used. The barrel headwater within the riser must be accounted for when determining the discharge rate for multiple stage openings (Appendix 4-14e to 4-14i for sample calculations). Principal and emergency spillway calculations. Trash rack sizing computations must be provided Danger reach analysis and dam hazard classification are required for all MD378 ponds. For purposes of computing pre-development runoff, all lands in the watershed shall be assumed to be in good hydrologic condition. Design ponds to safely pass the 100-year storm, ultimate development, for the entire drainage area to the basin. When the principal spillway connects to an existing storm drain system, it is the designer's responsibility to ensure that the hydraulic effects of the existing storm drain are included. Routings through reservoirs shall be performed using acceptable methods approved by the USDA, NRCS. Generally TR-20 is expected to be utilized. For wet ponds, provide computations to indicate that drain valve is capable of draining the pond to 1' of depth within 24 hours. Provide computations to indicate that pond goes into barrel control prior to riser going into orifice control. Provide anti-flotation analysis for riser structures. Assume all openings are blocked and allow for a factor of safety of 1.2 or greater.
i) j) k) l) m) n)
o) p) q) r)
4.5.4
Underground Attenuation Facilities In addition to the supporting information required for the above ground attenuation structures, the following criteria must be met for underground attenuation facilities: 1) Design Requirements a) b) c) d) Provide crossover connector pipes between storage pipes, as necessary. Provide profile of entire system with inverts, pipe size, pipe type, and slopes indicated. Provide HGL through facility. Provide detail of the control structure used for attenuation.
4-30
Stormwater Management Design Manual e) f) g) h) i) j) k) l)
Provide a minimum of 48" diameter pipes for storage for ease of maintenance and inspection. Provide gauge and corrugation size for metal pipes. All access points should be vented. Provide a cross-section and plan-view. Provide watertight joints at all pipe connections, when required per manufacturer's requirements. Provide note on plan: All debris is to be kept out of facility during and after construction. Retention underground is not permitted. Infiltration trenches below the attenuation pipes are allowed if no other feasible infiltration location is available due to other constraints. The infiltration trench must be designed following the criteria established for standard infiltration trenches (for private system only). The low-flow opening in the control structure must be protected with a trash rack. Paint metal surfaces with two coats of battleship grey paint or equivalent. The control structure shall be constructed with reinforced concrete. Anti-flotation analysis may be required to check for buoyancy problems, especially in high water table areas. If required, anchors shall be designed to counter the pipe buoyancy by at least a 1.2 factor of safety. Inlet capacity computations for underground facilities must show that the inlets are capable of handling the design storm used in the underground facility.
m) n) o) p) q) r)
4.5.5
Stormwater Management Geotechnical Information Soil analysis is required for all retention and detention basins, analysis is to include: 1) Soil boring information is to be obtained from a minimum of three borings along the center line of the embankment. One boring shall be taken near the existing low point, and one boring shall be taken in each overbank. If an emergency spillway is to be provided, one boring shall be taken in the emergency spillway. At least one boring shall be taken in the planned borrow area (Appendix 4-14a). An additional boring may be necessary at the proposed riser and downstream endwall locations. This can be done by either standard penetration testing or test pits. Minimum depth is to equal height of embankment plus 5 feet. This boring log shall be shown on the profile sheet where a longitudinal section of the dam is shown.
4-31
A geotechnical report signed and sealed by a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer shall be submitted regarding the stability of the embankment and appurtenant structure. Analysis of items 4 through 7 shall be done as designed by the geotechnical engineer. Laboratory testing shall include: permeability, grain size, liquid limit, plastic limit, natural moisture, compaction tests, consolidation and shear tests. Provide seepage and uplift analysis. Provide settlement analysis based on consolidation tests of saturated foundation soils. Provide stability analysis of embankment slope for both construction and rapid drawdown cases. One soil boring shall be located at the emergency spillway, if proposed. Soil boring information shall be in the Unified Soil Classification System. Underground watertable should be shown if encountered for all soils reports.
3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9)
4-32
Chapter 5 Low Impact Development
CHAPTER 5
5.0 5.1 LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT General
Low-impact development stormwater management design (LID) approaches are fundamentally different from conventional design approaches and challenge traditional thinking regarding development standards, watershed protection, and public participation. LID combines fundamental hydrologic concepts with many of todays common stormwater strategies, practices and techniques to reshape development patterns in a way that maintains natural watershed hydrologic functions. The five principles of LID are: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Conservation of existing natural and topographic features; minimization of land clearing and impervious surfaces; maintain or lengthen the pre-developed time of concentration; installation of IMPs; and use of pollution previous measures and practices.
The stormwater management goal for LID is to mimic predevelopment runoff conditions for runoff volume, peak runoff rate, and frequency. To accomplish this, stormwater is managed in small landscape features located on each lot rather than in large facilities located at the outlet of drainage areas. Hydrologic functions such as infiltration, frequency and volume of discharges, and ground water recharge can be maintained with the use of reduced impervious surfaces, functional grading, open channel sections, disconnection and utilization of runoff, and the use of bioretention/filtration landscape areas. This source control concept is quite different from conventional end-of-pipe treatment. Since every aspect of site development affects the hydrologic response of the site, LID runoff control techniques also can address every aspect of site development. There is a wide array of impact reduction and site design techniques that allow the site planner/engineer to create stormwater control mechanisms that function in a similar manner to natural control mechanisms. A fully successful LID design will mimic the watersheds water balance among volumes of runoff, infiltration, storage, ground water recharge, and evapotranspiration. With the LID approach, receiving waters experience little change in the volume, frequency, or quality of runoff or in the base flows fed by ground water. Using the Countys Site Assessment Model (SAM), DER determined that creating storage areas throughout the green space of the site and routing runoff in ways that would lengthen flow paths and increase travel time had a significant impact on post-development stormwater discharge volume and peak discharge rate. Prince Georges County is advocating the use of LID to achieve the following objectives: Provide a superior technology for environmental protection of our receiving waters. Provide economic incentives to provide environmentally sensitive development. Develop the full potential of environmentally sensitive site planning and design.
5-1
Encourage public education and participation in environmental protection. Help build communities based on environmental stewardship. Reduce maintenance costs of the stormwater infrastructure. Introduce new concepts, technologies, and objectives for stormwater management such as micromanagement and multi-functional landscape features (rain gardens, swales, and conservation areas); mimic or replicate hydrologic functions; and maintain the ecological/biological integrity of receiving streams. Encourage flexibility in regulations that allows innovative engineering and site planning to promote smart growth principles. Encourage debate on the economic, environmental, and technical viability and applicability of current stormwater practices and alternative approaches. The LID analysis and design approach focuses on the following hydrologic analysis and design components: Runoff Volume Control: The predevelopment volume is maintained by a dual strategy of minimizing the site disturbance and then providing distributed retention areas that retain the runoff for the design storm event. A detailed CN evaluation is required to determine the required runoff volume. The storage volume determination, expressed as a percentage of the overall site area, is based on the design charts and homographs included in the LID Design Manual. Peak Runoff Rate Control: LID is designed to maintain the predevelopment peak runoff discharge rate for the selected design storm events. This is done by maintaining the predevelopment Tc and then using retention practices to control runoff volume and, if these retention practices are not sufficient to control the peak runoff rate, to use additional detention practices to control the peak runoff rate. Detention is temporary storage that releases excess runoff at a controlled rate. The use of retention and detention to control the peak runoff rate is defined as the hybrid approach. Flow Frequency/Duration Control: Since LID is designed to emulate the predevelopment hydrologic regime through both volume and peak runoff rate controls, the flow frequency and duration for the post-development conditions will be almost identical to those for the predevelopment conditions. The impacts of development on the sediment and erosion and stream habit potential at downstream reaches can then be minimized. Water Quality Control: LID is designed to provide water quality treatment (WQv) using retention and filtration practices. The storage required for water quality control is compared to the storage required to control the increased runoff volume. The greater of the two volumes is the required retention storage. Composite CN: The distribution of CN values in subareas across the site are assessed. LID design exploits opportunities to keep the composite CN for the site low by reducing impervious areas and preserving more trees and meadows. Prince Georges County 5-2
Consequently, this will lessen the amount of storage that would otherwise be required to maintain the predevelopment runoff volume. Drainage Area Tc: While development typically decreases the Tc for the site, the predevelopment Tc can be restored by lengthening flow paths and reducing the length of piped and channelized runoff conveyance systems in favor of greater overland flow lengths. Retention: Retention storage can be provided for both volume and peak control, as well as for water quality control. Detention: After other LID strategies are utilized, detention areas can be used necessary to maintain the same peak runoff rate and/or prevent downstream flooding. 5.2 LID Planning Techniques to Reduce the Post-development LID CN Preservation of Pervious Soils: This approach includes site planning techniques such as minimizing the disturbance of soilsparticularly in vegetated areasthat have high infiltration rates (Hydrologic Soil Groups [HGSs] A and B) and placement of infrastructure and impervious areas such as houses, roads, and buildings on more impermeable soils (Hydrologic Soil Groups C and D). Care must be taken when determining the suitability of soils for the proposed construction. Adequate geotechnical information is required for planning practices. Preservation of Existing Natural Vegetation: Woods and other vegetated areas provide many opportunities for storage and infiltration of runoff. By maintaining the natural coverage to the greatest extent possible, the amount of storage needed for runoff management is minimized. Vegetated areas also can be used to provide surface roughness, thereby increasing the Tc. In addition, they function to filter out pollutants. Minimization of Site Imperviousness: Reducing the amount of imperviousness on the site will have a significant impact on the amount of compensatory BMP storage required. Disconnection of Site Imperviousness: Impervious areas are considered disconnected if they do not connect to a storm drain system or other impervious areas though direct or shallow concentrated flow. Directing runoff from impervious areas onto vegetated areas as sheet flow will increase infiltration, resulting in a direct reduction in runoff and corresponding storage volume requirements. When the impervious areas constitute less than 30 percent of the total site, the percentage of the unconnected impervious areas within the watershed influences the calculation of the composite CN (SCS, 1986). By increasing the ratio of disconnected impervious areas to pervious areas on the site, the CN and the resultant runoff volume can be reduced. Equation 5.1 is used to calculate the CN for sites with less than 30 percent impervious area.
5-3
Pimp CNc = CNp + (98 CNp ) (1 0.5 R ) 100

where: R = ratio of unconnected impervious area to total impervious area; CNc = composite CN; CNP = composite pervious CN; and Pimp = percent of impervious site area.
Equation 5.1
Creation of Transition Zones: Transition zones are vegetated areas that can be used to store and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas before the runoff is discharged from the site. Providing these areas will not only affect the characteristics of site runoff, but also affect the computation of CN values. 5.3 LID Techniques to Maintain the Pre-development Time of Concentration
Proper use of the analytic tools developed by Prince Georges County for LID hydrologic design and analysis evaluation requires that the post-development time of concentration (Tc) be equal to the predevelopment Tc. To maintain the Tc, LIDs use the following site planning techniques: Maintaining or increasing the length of the predevelopment flow paths by dispersing and redirecting flows, generally through open swales and natural drainage patterns. Increasing surface roughness (e.g., by reserving woodlands and using vegetated swales). Detaining flow (e.g., in open swales and bioretention). Minimizing site disturbance (avoiding the need for compaction and changes to existing vegetation). Flattening grades in impacted areas. Disconnecting impervious areas (e.g., by eliminating curb/gutter and redirecting downspouts). Connecting pervious and vegetated areas (e.g., by reforestation, and a forestation). Increasing the flow length Minimizing the amount of flow in closed channels and pipes Maximizing sheet flow regime. Using a network of wider and flatter channels to avoid fast-moving channel flow.
5-4
Stormwater Management Design Manual 5.4 Retention and Detention Storage
Small retention storage areas pond water on site for release through infiltration, evaporation, and transpiration, rather than through surface runoff during a storm event. Providing retention storage on site will reduce the post-development runoff volume and the peak runoff rate. Strategic use of retention storage to supplement the runoff reductions achieved by selective land cover choices allows the predevelopment runoff volume to be maintained. Retention devices for maintaining the predevelopment volume include, but are not limited to, the following: Infiltration trenches Retention ponds Rain barrels Bioretention (rain garden) Irrigation ponds Rooftop storage In some cases, the amount of storage that maintains the predevelopment runoff volume will also be sufficient to maintain the predevelopment peak runoff rate. Where it is not, additional storage is required in the form of detention storage. LID stormwater management techniques for providing detention storage include, but are not limited to, the following: Swales with check dams, restricted drainage pipe, and inlet entrances Wider swales Rain barrel Rooftop storage Diversion structures In order to meet the County and State requirements for stormwater management, the following conditions must be met. 1) 2) The total LID retention volume provided must be greater than the required groundwater recharge volume (Rev). The total LID retention volume plus detention volume must be greater than the required water quality volume (WQv) plus the required channel protection storage volume (Cpv).
5-5
5.5
Determination of Design Storm Event
A fundamental LID design objective for stormwater management is to keep runoff volumes and peak runoff rates for the developed site at or below the runoff volumes and peak runoff rates for the same site prior to development. These volumes and rates are associated with a specified design storm. The criteria used to select the design storm for LID are based on the goal of maintaining the predevelopment hydrologic conditions for the site. The determination of the design storm begins with an evaluation of the predevelopment condition. The hydrologic approach of LID is to retain the same amount of rainfall within the development site as that retained by woods, in good condition, and then to gradually release the excess runoff as woodlands would release it. By doing so, we can emulate, to the greatest extent practical, the predevelopment hydrologic regime to protect watershed and natural habitats. The CN for the predevelopment condition is to be determined based on the land cover being woods in good condition and the existing HSG. The design storm is to be the greater of the rainfall at which direct runoff begins from a woods in good condition, with a modifying factor, or the 1-year 24-hour storm event (2.7). The rainfall at which direct runoff begins is determined using Equation 5.2. The initial rainfall amount at which direct runoff begins from a woodland is modified by multiplying this amount by a factor of 1.5 account for the slower runoff release rate under the wooded predevelopment condition.
1000 P = 0.2 10 CNc

where: P = rainfall at which direct runoff begins.
Equation 5.2
Example:
Determination of Design Storm
Step 1: Determine the predevelopment CN based on woods (good condition) and HSG. Given: Site condition of 90% HSG soil type B and 10% HSG soil type C, CNc = 0.9 (55) + 0.1 x (70) CNc 56.5 57 use 57 Step 2: Determine the amount of rainfall to initiate direct runoff using Equation 5.2
1000 10 P = 0.2 CNc

P = 1.5 inches
5-6
Stormwater Management Design Manual Step 3: Multiply the amount of rainfall by a factor of 1.5. Design rainfall = P x 1.5 Design rainfall = 1.5 inches x 1.5 Design rainfall = 2.25 inches Use 1-year rainfall = 2.7 5.6 LID Techniques
Overland Sheet Flow. The site should be graded to maximize the overland sheet flow distance and to minimize disturbance of woodland along the Tc flow path. This practice will increase travel times, thereby increasing the time of concentration. Consequently, the peak discharge rate will be decreased. Flow velocity in areas graded to natural drainage ways should not exceed 1 fps. Flow Path. Increase flow path or travel distance of surface runoff to increase infiltration and travel time. Site and lot slopes. Flatten lot slopes to approach a minimum 1% to increase infiltration and travel time. For residential development, LID grading practices should be applied to lot areas located outside of the building pad area. The building pad area is a 10-foot perimeter around the building with a positive drainage of 4% slope. Lot areas outside the building pad perimeter should contain a positive slope of at least 1%. The engineer is responsible for ensuring that the slope of the lot does not cause flooding during the 100-year storm event (i.e., 1-foot vertical and 25-foot horizontal distance must be provided between the 100-year overflow path and the dwelling unit). Soil compaction in the lot area should be avoided to maximize the infiltration capacity of the soil. These infiltration areas can be hydraulically connected to impervious surfaces such as rooftops and driveways to decrease travel times for these areas. Open Swales. Wherever possible, LID aims to use open drainage systems in lieu of more conventional storm drain systems. To alleviate flooding problems and reduce the need for conventional storm drain systems, vegetated or grassed open drainage systems should be provided as the primary means of conveying surface runoff between lots and along roadways. At no time shall either 5 cfs be exceeded or runoff traveling over more than 3 lots be permitted. Site and Lot Vegetation. Revegetate and/or plant graded areas to promote natural retention and increase travel time. Revegetating graded areas, planting, or preserving existing vegetation can reduce the peak discharge rate by creating added surface roughness as well as providing for additional retention and reducing the surface water runoff volume. Strategic clearing and grading practices are an effective method of reducing stormwater quantity and erosion impacts on downstream receiving waters and aquatic habitat. Minimizing clearing and grading within forested and densely vegetated areas on HSG A and B type soils is an efficient method of reducing changes to the CN.
5-7
Vegetated buffers are strips of vegetation, either natural or planted, around sensitive areas, such as water bodies, wetlands, or highly erodible soils. In addition to protecting sensitive areas, vegetated strips help to reduce stormwater runoff impacts by trapping sediment and sediment-bound pollutants, encouraging infiltration, and slowing and dispersing stormwater flows over a wide area. Engineered landscaping is one method of mitigating the hydrologic impacts of clearing and grading. In some cases, the majority of the site will have to be cleared and graded, resulting in the loss of much woody vegetation and debris. A carefully designed landscaping plan can be used to reestablish some of the vegetative functions lost during this process. Heavily revegetated areas can improve sediment removal, infiltration, and community aesthetics. Curb elimination addresses both quantity as well as water quality functions. When curbs are removed, site imperviousness is disconnected by allowing stormwater runoff, normally conveyed along the roadside and discharged directly into a storm drain system or receiving water body, to be dispersed to vegetated buffer areas or roadside swales. This process helps to minimize CN impacts, increase or maintain the Tc, and filter pollutants leaving a given site. Bioretention: Bioretention BMPs are applicable as on-lot retention facilities that are designed to mimic pre-developed hydrologic regimes that naturally control hydrology through infiltration and evapotranspiration. They are especially suited to residential and commercial areas where additional landscaping can provide aesthetic benefits. It is recommended that biorention areas incorporate vegetated filter strips as pretreatment devices. In commercial areas where space is limited, parking area sweeping is recommended as a pretreatment practice. Filter Strips: Filter strips are typically bands of close-growing vegetation, usually grass, planted between pollutant source areas and a downstream receiving waterbody. They also can be used as outlet of pretreatment devices for other stormwater control practices. For LID sites, a filter strip should be viewed as only one component in a stormwater management system. LID filter strips should be planted in combination with existing natural vegetation to meet the needed filter width. Usually the minimum width for grassed filter areas is 15 feet, while that of wooded areas is 35 feet. Depending on specific site conditions, filter areas may be as wide as 150 feet. Filter strips function best hen they are level in the direction of stormwater flow toward the receiving water. This orientation creates proper sheet flow through the strip, increasing infiltration and filtering of sediments and other organic solids. To prevent erosion channel formation, a level spreader should be situated along the top edge of the strip. Grassed Swales: Grassed swales are earthen channels covered with a dense growth of hardy grass, such as Tall Fescue. Grassed swales are applicable alongside private roads and when using Prince Georges County DPW&T Standard detail 15-A on public roads. Grassed swales are typically located at the outlets of road culverts, as conveyance between homes, and as highway medians.
5-8
Maximum swale depth is to be 2.9 feet, with a maximum head of flow over a private driveway of 1.5 feet. Culvert structures should have a weir located no closer than 1 foot from the inlet to control the peak flow rate. The 100-year overflow path can be no deeper than 2 inches over the driveway. LID swales may be designed with a curvilinear width to maximize storage volume for detention. For LID sites, side slopes outside a Rights-Of-Way may be 2:1. Longitudinal slope in swales must be minimized to a maximum of 2%. Dry Wells: Dry wells are small excavated trenches backfilled with stone. Dry wells function as infiltration system used to control surfaced pollutants. Rain Barrels: Rain barrels operate by retaining a predetermined volume of rooftop runoff. An overflow pipe provides some detention beyond the retention capacity of the rain barrel. Rain barrels also can be used to store runoff for later reuse in lawn and garden watering. Level Spreaders: A level spreader typically is an outlet designed to convert concentrated runoff to sheet flow and disperse it uniformly across a slope to prevent erosion. One type of level spreader is a shallow trench filled with crushed stone. The lower edge of the level spreader must be exactly level for the spreader to work properly. 5.7 5.7.1 Steps to LID Plan Processing Step 1: LID Planning and Site Analysis. Site feasibility study and initial contact with DER, DPW&T and M-NCPPC. 5.7.2 Step 2: Pre-preliminary Planning Phase Optional preliminary review phase to identify opportunities and potential problems with review agencies. 5.7.3 Step 3: Stormwater Concept Plan Phase Review and approval of preliminary hydrologic analysis and BMP selection. 5.7.4 Step 4: Preliminary Plan/subdivision Review and Approval Detailed site plan. Specific design plan reviewed and approved, if required by zoning ordinance. Site design issues for residential development. 5.7.5 Step 5: Technical Review Phase Technical review of calculations and structural details. 5.7.6 Step 6: Fees and Bonds Determination of final construction and bonding fees.
5-9
Stormwater Management Design Manual 5.7.7 Step 7: Construction/Inspection Phase
Determination of proper construction, proper soils and stabilization of BMPs. 5.7.8 Step 8: Public Outreach and Education Maintenance materials and education for property owners and property managers. 5.7.9 Step 9: Maintenance Ongoing upkeep and improvement of facilities. 5.8 Pre-Preliminary Plan Phase
This is an optional step in the subdivision review process for conventional land development. However, it is strongly encouraged for developers of LID sites to seek a pre-preliminary review from DER, DPW&T and M-NCPPC to help the developer determine the feasibility of the proposed LID proposal. All three departments encourage applicants to submit plans for courtesy reviews as early as possible. The information submitted for review at this stage should include the following: Identify the potential for any waivers, variances, alternative compliance, and the potential for small lot review. Provide preliminary pre- and post-development Curve Numbers (CN). Show significant pre- and post-development drainage divides and topography with 2foot contour intervals. (more detail will be required later.) The post-development divides should be in relatively close concurrence with the predevelopment divides. Provide a summary of the overall BMP storage requirements for the site based on the LID analytical methodology outlined in Chapter 2 of the LID Design Manual. Submit any soils investigative work. Note: using the soil survey map book to determine the soil group types is permissible for preliminary work. However; soil borings and geotechnical investigation is recommended to avid soil infiltration problems occurring late in the engineering design stage resulting in additional engineering costs and review time. Provide a plan view drawing showing the existing conditions of the site. Provide a plan view drawing showing the proposed conditions including the lot layout, road network, stream crossing, soils, drainage divides typical road crosssection, bioretention areas, and other LID components. The approximate location and percentage of the site for each BMP should also be included. The scale of the drawing should be sufficient enough to show adequate detail. Preferred maximum scale is 1:50. Demonstrate that Unified Sizing Criteria have been met.
5-10
Stormwater Management Design Manual 5.9 Stormwater Concept Plan Phase
Review and approval of the stormwater concept plan is the next step after the determination of the feasibility of the development. Submission of the following minimum information is required to adequately review the proposal: All of the information listed in the Pre-preliminary Plan Phase as well as any correspondence on agency meetings or conversations. Identification of any areas using 1% grades. Preliminary requests for any waivers, alternative compliance, or variance. The plans should also identify these areas. Sketch details of the alternatives should also be included. 5.10 Preliminary Plan/Subdivision Review and Detail Site Plan/Specific Design Plan Approval
Once the conditions and requirements are determined by the Stormwater Concept Plan approval, the final design process can begin. This section lists considerations for developments that require subdivision and/or detailed site plan/specific design plan review. Overall Site Design: The M-NCPPC oversees the review of plans for conformance with zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations. They review stormwater management and natural resources considerations as well. Their primary concern in the review of LID plans is the resolution of any potential conflicts between BMPs and zoning and subdivision requirements (including the Landscape Manual). Plans for which a Detailed Site Plan or Specific Design Plan are required will also be reviewed for site design considerations such s health, safety, welfare, pedestrian access, park acquisition, encroachment onto park property buffers, and aesthetics. Details or sketches that represent the BMPs should be included so that the M-NCPPC can adequately determine the compatibility of the BMPs with the development proposal. Alternative Compliance: Section 1.3 of the Landscape Manual provides an Alternative Compliance process available to developers for projects that cannot meet normal landscaping requirements. LID may necessitate changes from the typical subdivision landscaping criteria. For example, bioretention incorporates extensive landscaping. Depending on the nature and degree of the changes to normal landscape requirements, the developer may need to apply for alternative compliance. Contact the Urban Design Section at M-NCPPC for information concerning the Alternative Compliance procedure. 5.11 Technical Review Phase
The LID stormwater management design plan is reviewed by DER. Although the use of certain BMPs may be approved at the concept phase, it must be demonstrated that these facilities can be successfully designed and maintained at the technical review stage. It is the designers responsibility to ensure that the feasibility of the design meets existing criteria and codes. For specific design criteria, see Chapter 2 and 4 in the Low Impact Development Design Manual.
5-11
Stormwater Management Design Manual 5.11.1 LID Plan Submittal
The LID plan submittal process is similar to the conventional Stormwater Management Plan submittal process. The following additional information is required: Submit 1 additional set of plans and computations for all LID subdivisions. A copy of the transmittal should be sent to the attention of Programs and Planning Division, Planning Section. Identification of all LID techniques and structures should be included. Additional lot grading detail is required when on-lot facilities are incorporated. Grading detail will be required to show grades to an accuracy enough to show changes in surface grades where LID BMPs are used. 5.11.2 Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Submittal Concurrent with the LID plan submittal, a sediment control plan must be submitted to the Prince Georges County Soil Conservation District for review and approval. Sediment and erosion control practices for LID subdivisions may be placed at the same location as LID practices. If LID BMPs are placed at the same location as sediment control practices, soils must be checked and the LID BMP invert should be at least 1 foot below the sediment control practice invert. The phasing plan and narrative should reflect the incremental development pattern of the site. 5.12 Fees and Bonding
LID sites will be permitted through the same process as conventional developments. Because permit fees and bonds are typically based on the extent of infrastructure development proposed, utilizing LID may reduce the costs associated with the review fees, permit fees and bond amounts. 5.13 Construction/Inspection Phase
Although each site is unique, it is suggested that the following LID construction procedure/sequence be used: Follow Prince Georges County recommended sequence of construction (contact DER for an example). Contact DER to request a storm drain construction permit and to arrange a preconstruction meeting. Refer to Chapter 10 for specific inspection/asbuilt/bonding requirements. Contact DER for information on waivers for LID.
5-12
5.14
Public Outreach and Education
Public outreach and education is key component of LID and must be integrated into the entire development process. The Department of Environmental Resources will assist developers, builders, real estate professionals, property mangers, and homeowners to convey the importance of LID and how they can help make it work. 5.15 Maintenance
LID practices and techniques should be designed to reduce the need for maintenance and increase the aesthetics of the property. However, occasional maintenance will need to be performed to ensure proper function. Maintenance responsibilities will typically rest with the individual property owner where the facility is located. Routine maintenance such as trash removal, weeding, mulching and pruning of bioretention areas and swales will need to be performed as needed, but at least twice yearly. Maintenance enforcement will be accomplished through signed agreements (also known as maintenance covenants) either with the individual property owner or with the Homeowners Association. LID structures and appurtenances will not be permitted within the road ROW.
5-13
Chapter 6 Storm Drain Easements and Rights-of-Way
CHAPTER 6
6.0 6.1
STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY Storm Drain Easement Submission Requirements
DER has a series of requirements for submission of easements and rights-of-way. Obviously, if one or more of these requirements is not met, the approval process will be delayed. Adherence to the following list of requirements will expedite the approval of easements/rights-of-way: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Consultants transmittal. Two Prince Georges County survey transmittals (per grantor) (Appendix 6-1). Approved storm drain plan. (complete set) All easements are to be submitted at the same time. Legal description on legal size paper, certified correct by a Maryland Registered Land Surveyor (original and three (3) copies). Boundary survey drawings on legal size tracing paper of the same scale as the approved storm drain plan, certified correct by a Maryland Registered Land Surveyor (original and three (3) copies). Supporting documents, deeds of ownership, etc. If dedicated by deed, easements must be shown in red on the approved storm drain plan. If dedicated by record plat, easements must be shown in green on the approved storm drain plan and the approved record plat. Note: Dedication of parcels and outlots: easement dedicated of parcels and outlots through record plat, prior to March 1990, must be submitted along with the corresponding deeds for review.
7. 8. 9.
10.
Existing easements must be shown in yellow on the approved storm drain plan. Note: Submit supporting documents as a proof that the easement is existing and recorded in the land records of Prince Georges County, Maryland.
11.
Right of entry for construction of storm drain/stormwater facilities on Prince Georges County Property. Prince Georges County will approve the construction of stormwater facilities by using a right-of-entry agreement.
6-1
Note: When asking to construct on Prince Georges County property, submit a package the same way you would for an easement. Two (2) Prince Georges County survey transmittals. Legal description on legal size paper, certified correct by a Maryland Registered Land Surveyor (original and three (3) copies). Boundary survey drawings, legal size tracing paper of the same scale as the approved storm drain plan and certified correct by a Maryland Registered Land surveyor (original and three (3) copies).
This information will be forwarded to the Department of Public Works and Transportation Rights-of-Way Division for processing. 12. 13. All easements for storm drains must go through DER. Processing easements in any other way, will delay the permit for the project. In case the utilities are designed parallel with another, they should have a separate easement and the easements will be recorded by Deed dedication. In the case of the proposed easement that will be over and parallel to an existing easement, the approval from the holder of the existing easement and the property owner must be obtained. In both of the above cases, overlapping easements are acceptable provided the design is reviewed and approved by the respective governing agencies. The following is the standard storm drain circular pipe easement requirement: For 8 depth maximum Size of Pipe Width of R/W 15 15 18 18 21 18 24 18 27 25 30 25 33 25 36 25 42 30 48 30 54 35 60 35 66 40 For 12 depth\maximum Width of R/W Size of Pipe 84 45 96 50 108 55
14.
6-2
15.
Where proposed conditions warrant, the minimum storm drain easement width shall be 25 or greater as needed. Conditions such as: Slope >25% Limited access from one direction Extreme distance from public Rights-Of-Way Restricted work/stockpile spare
16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
Since the depth of the pipe is variable, the easement size determination will be based on the highest cover over pipe. For storm drain pipe that is designed deeper than 8 feet depth, add 2 feet per every foot drop to the standard easement requirement. For parallel dual, triple and more pipe design, use the illustration in Appendix 6-4 to determine the easement. For elliptical pipe, use the equivalent round pipe standard easement requirement. For open concrete, gabions and riprap channels, use the illustration in Appendix 6-4 to determine the required easement. Surface Drainage And Floodplain Easements Surface Drainage Easements: When a surface drainage easement has been requested as part of the technical plan, submit the surface drainage easement to DER, as a part of the storm drain easement package. When a surface drainage easement is asked for as a part of the grading requirements, submit the surface drainage easement to DER. DER will send the package to the Department of Public Works and Transportation Rights-of-Way Division for processing. Floodplain easements: Submit a complete floodplain package to DER. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Consultants transmittal. Two Prince Georges County Survey transmittals (per grantor). Legal description on legal size paper, certified correct by a Maryland register land surveyor. Original and three (3) copies. Boundary survey drawings, legal size paper, certified correct by a Maryland registered land surveyor. (Original and three copies). Submit any supporting documents: Record Plat, deeds of ownership, etc.
6.2
6-3
Note: Floodplain easements do not need to be the same scale as the storm drain or floodplain plan. 6.3 Procedures For Release And Abandonment Submit the release package to DER for review. You will need the following information: 1. Consultants transmittal 2. Prince Georges County Transmittal (Appendix 6-3) 3. Letter of explanation as to why the stormdrain easement is being released or abandoned. 4. Plan showing the existing easement to be released. 5. Mark the easement to be released in yellow 6. Legal description 7. Boundary survey drawing 8. Copy of recorded easement that is to be released 9. Any supporting documents DER will review the release. If there is no objection to the release, the package will be sent to Department of Public Works and Transportation Rights-of-Way Divsion for processing. Note: A release must go through the Administrative Review Committee (ARC) for approval and signature by and authorized County Official before being released. This process can take four to six weeks. DER will notify all interested parties after the release is secured. 6.4 Revision Submission For Public Storm Drains If a revision is necessary, the following
Revision submission for permitted public projects. procedures must be followed:
If any additional on-site easement/rights-of-way is required, the owner/developer must draft and sign a letter of agreement and send it to DER. For on-site easements/rights-of-way, this letter must state that the owner/developer understands that as-builts will not be finalized and the bond will not be released until the revised easement(s) is/are recorded. (all easements are recorded with the land records of Prince Georges County, Maryland.) For off-site easements/rights-ofway, the revision will not be signed until the easement/rights-of-way are recorded with the land records of Prince Georges County, Maryland. Note: A signed copy of the written agreement will be forwarded to: Bond Coordinator DER As-built coordinator DER Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPW&T), when bonded and/or inspected by DPW&T
All of the above will be checked by the rights-of-way coordinator of DER to make sure the easements are secured before any releases are granted.
6-4
The revision package is to be sent to DER. If the easements/rights-of-way are acceptable they will be forwarded to the Department of Public Works and Transportation Rights-Of-Way Division for processing. When submitting an easement/rights-of-way revision, mark the revision box on the Prince Georges County transmittal. Write a brief explanation as to what the revision involves. By following this procedure you will eliminate unnecessary delays in processing your revision. 6.5 Declaration Of Covenants
For private storm drain pipes, structures or facilities, no easement dedication and delineation is required. However, a maintenance agreement must be signed and recorded in Land Records by the property owner prior to the issuance of the grading permit. The agreement is between the owner of the property and Prince Georges County and allows the County to inspect the facility and enforce maintenance as described in the maintenance agreement. No changes to the agreement are allowed. (Appendix 6-2) 6.6 Permitting
The approval of storm drain easements is only one phase of the permit process. Before a DER permit can be issued the following requirements must be met: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Bonding Floodplain approval Floodplain Easements Review Fees Fee-in-Lieu Maintenance Agreements for Private SWM/Storm Drains Special requirements as required by Concept and Technical Section
If you need assistance reviewing the requirements for your project, please contact DER at 301883-5905. When you are making inquiries, have the storm drain number that has been assigned the project and the name of the project. 6.7 Floodplain Easement Requirements
Whenever a floodplain issue is involved in any development project at grading permit stage and/or at record plat stage, the engineer is required to obtain an easement which encompasses the 100-year floodplain. In order to meet this requirement, the following guidelines must be met: 6.7.1 1. 2. 3. Guidelines Prior to delineating an easement area, an approved floodplain study must be provided. The approved floodplain study must be recognized at DER (i.e., current FEMA, SWM Technical Group Comprehensive Management Plans, Adopted Private Study). DER will review the development plan against the approved floodplain study.
6-5
Stormwater Management Design Manual 4. 5. 6.
DER will coordinate the recordation of the easement to ensure compatibility with the approved technical plan. Note: It is the design engineers responsibility to make sure plans match. The floodplain easement may be recorded by one of two methods: a) b) Dedication of floodplain by recorded plat of subdivision through M-NCPPC. Dedication of floodplain by written legal document to be recorded via the Department of Public Works and Transportation Rights-Of-Way Division.
7.
Upon request, the distribution of the floodplain easement to appropriate agencies will follow the recordation. Submission Requirements
6.7.2
Basically, the submission requirements are the same as those for storm drain easements (see Section 6.1.0). Some additional information/data are as follows: 1. Easement information to be recorded through Department of Public Works and Transportation should be submitted to DER. 2. Submit all supporting documents to aid in recordation of easements (e.g.: deeds, previous easement description, plans, etc.) 6.7.3 Release of Floodplain Easements The same procedures as those listed in Section 6.3.0 should be followed.
6-6
Chapter 7 Bonding
CHAPTER 7
7.0 7.1
BONDING Introduction
All proposed developments in Prince Georges County that contain public storm drain and stormwater management systems that will be publicly maintained, are required to be bonded. Prior to the issuance of a storm drain permit. Types of securities acceptable to the County include: Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Irrevocable Assignment of Account, Cash (check for County to hold in non-interest escrow), Certificate of Guaranty and Surety. Examples of the approved Prince Georges County forms are found in Appendices 7-1 to 7-4. 7.2 Construction Cost Estimates
In order to determine the bond amount for construction of public systems, the developer or representative shall submit the construction cost estimates (Appendix 7-5) along with a copy of the technically approved plans and a transmittal requesting cost estimate approval to DER. 7.3 General Instructions 1) Performance Bonds Surety (Insurance Company Bonds), Letter of Credit, Cash or Assignment of Account. All performance bonds will be 100% of the total project construction cost plus 25% contingency. All Bonds will be accompanied by three (3) each of the proper forms signed with original signatures and original Notary Public per form. The bond number is considered the same number as the public stormwater system permit (i.e., SD #998002040). See instructions for authorized Banks and how to fill out form. All bonds and filled out forms are to be returned to DER to be processed. No permit will be issued until the bond is completed and accepted. All bonds and completed forms will be transmitted by DER to the County Office of Law except cash bonds which will be transmitted by DER to the Treasury Office.
2) 3) 4) 5) 6)
7.4
Municipal Bond 1) 2) Municipalities may bond Municipal Projects within their jurisdiction, providing they submit evidence of such bond to DER. The City of Greenbelt may be responsible for monitoring bonds for public systems that lie within their municipality, however the bonds are to be posted with the County.
7-1
Stormwater Management Design Manual 7.5 Departmental Bonding
Chapter 7 Bonding
Bonding of projects with DER and the Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPW&T) shall be processed through each respective Department under the criteria set forth below. 1) Bonding through DPW&T. a) All stormwater management, water quality structures and outfalls within DPW&Ts public road rights-of-way, including infiltration devices. If the outfall extends beyond the public road rights-of-way, the bonding shall extend to the next logical structures. Single storm drain structure and connecting pipe located outside the road rights-of-way at either end of the system will also be bonded with DPW&T. All public storm drain structures and outfalls for townhouse and garden apartments, located outside of incorporated municipalities, including all water quality structures except ponds. All detention or retention stormwater management facilities using the road rights-of-way as an embankment (acting as a dam); DPW&T will bond from one (1) foot below street sub-grade elevations and up.
b)
c)
2)
Bonding through DER a) All public stormwater management structures and outfalls that lie outside the public road Rights-Of-Way will be bonded through DER. If the outfall extends beyond the public road rights-of-way involving several structures, DER will bond from the next structure on, outside the road Rights-Of-Way. All detention or retention stormwater management facilities using the road rights-of-way as an embankment (acting as dam); DER will bond from one (1) foot below street sub-grade elevations and down. All storm drain systems within the limits of Prince Georges County incorporated cities and municipalities with exception of the City of Bowie will be bonded with DER. The following is a list of cities and municipalities:
b)
c)
7-2
Chapter 7 Bonding
Bladensburg Berwyn Heights Brentwood Capitol Heights Cheverly Cottage City Colmar Manor College Park District Heights Edmonston Eagle harbor Fairmount Heights Forest Heights
Glenarden Hyattsville Laurel Landover Hills Morningside Mount Rainier North Brentwood New Carrollton Riverdale Park Seat Pleasant Upper Marlboro University Park
All storm drain systems within the City of Greenbelt will be bonded with the City of Greenbelt. However, bond estimates will be reviewed by DER.
NOTE: Whoever holds the bond, will inspect the construction of the project. d) To determine which storm drain piping system will be bonded with DPW&T and DER, the storm drain profiles must have Lead Arrows to indicate boundaries and limitations.
7.6
Requirements for Bond Submittal Note: Securities can be any of the following: Sureties (by Insurance Agency), Letter of Credit (by Bank), Assignment of Account (by Bank), Certificate of Guaranty (by Guaranty Company) or cash. Cash is sent direct from DER to the Office of Finance and is put into a non-interest bearing escrow account. 1) The applicant shall submit to DER, three (3) original Bond Agreements with Prince Georges County, 1 original and 2 copies of the security. This is known as the bond package.
7-3
Stormwater Management Design Manual 2) 3)
Chapter 7 Bonding
DER will review the agreement, and Security package for project name, number, amount, beneficiary owner, signatures and correct security format. DER will then forward the bond package to the Office of Law for review. The office of Law will not accept any bond packages which have not been processed through DER. The Office of Law reviews the bond package and will approve or disapprove with any necessary comments. The package will then be returned to DER. If the bond package is disapproved, DER will contact the appropriate representative with the reason(s) why it is not acceptable to the County. The package will be returned to the representative. Once corrections or additions have been made, the package must be resubmitted to DER. If the bond package is approved, DER will contact the representative. The proper information is applied to the approval system to indicate that the bond is posted.
4) 5)
6)
7.7
Bond Releases
Bonds cannot be released until the proper "final" notification, based on the project's final inspection and certification, is made by the DER inspector. The applicant or representative must formally submit the inspector's "final" report to the DER Bond Administrator. If other permits are being covered under a bond, they must also be finaled prior to bond release. Once the project is completed in compliance and meets the standards and specification requirements set forth by the County, and all finals are sent to the DER Bond Administrator, the release can be processed. The DER Bond Administrator sends a notification of bond release letter with the original security to the appropriate institution. A copy of the letter is sent to the person who has posted the bond. It is the responsibility of the person who is bonded with the institution to follow-up with that institution to be sure they have considered this information. Note: Cash bonds are processed from DER to the Office of Finance for check disbursement.
7-4
Chapter 8 Floodplains
CHAPTER 8
8.0 8.1
FLOODPLAINS Introduction
The Department of the Environmental Resources (DER) is the authority, which administers floodplain areas in Prince Georges County except in the City of Laurel. The following criteria have been established to help clarify policies and procedures relating to floodplain study submittals in Prince Georges County. 8.2 Authority of Jurisdiction
Council Bill 63-1980 adopted and published in the 1979 Edition of the Prince Georges County Code, enacted July 15, 1980, signed by the County Executive July 30, 1980, and effective on the same date, re-enacted the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations providing for restrictions on new developments in 100-year floodplain areas and requiring reservation of floodplain areas as open space. Council Bills 37-1983 and 110-1983 were signed by the County Executive and became effective August 3, 1983 and October 31, 1983, respectively. These bills revised the County Building Code, entitled Construction or Changes in Floodplain Areas and Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control, to maintain the 100-year flood protection standard and provide for the designation of floodplains in conformance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements, and restrict development in such areas. Council Bill 64-1987, adopted June 30, 1987 designated DER as the agency, which must approve floodplain limit determinations. Subtitle 4, Division 2, Section 4-187(a)(1) of the Building Code specifically provided for the publication of requirements and criteria for floodplain studies to be submitted to the Department. Council Resolution No. CR-17-1978 (adopted 2-2878) exempted all construction within the corporate limits of the city of Laurel from the provisions of Subtitle 4 of the Prince Georges County Code. Therefore, all floodplain submissions within the corporate limits shall be reviewed by the City of Laurel. The City may, at its option, request the Countys input or assistance in such reviews. Council Bill 24-1989 (DR-2), was adopted April 4, 1989, for the purpose of revising the Countys Floodplain Ordinance to conform to Federal and State requirements for continued participation in the National Flood Insurance Program, Federal and State financial assistance, disaster relief and for additional local requirements. In September, 1999 the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the County signed an Interagency Agreement to allow the County to participate in a new FEMA initiative called the Cooperating Technical Community (CTC) Program. Under this program, FEMA will delegate a portion of its floodplain authorities to the County. Specifically, the tasks involved under this CTC Program are as follows: 1) FEMA provides grant funding to develop a countywide GIS-based 2-foot topography using newly developed technology such as Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR). The Prince Georges County 8-1
Maryland State Highway Administration and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission are the other two partner agencies for this joint effort. 2) FEMA provides grant funding to re-do the entire FEMA study (normally referred to as the Flood Insurance Study) using the DER GIS-based hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) models. 3) With this GIS floodplain mapping and other GIS databases, the County can easily identify all flood-prone structures and properties. This information is very important for the flood risk assessment. Therefore, the County can conduct a detailed Damage Assessment Analysis after a flood event. 4) The County will conduct technical review of all FEMA Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) requests and then update the changes. The County will charge the developer a review fee that is identical to the fee schedule FEMA currently employs; but the review time will be significantly shorter. 5) The County will continue to conduct Floodplain Studies for the developers using the GISbased H&H models. The results of the studies will be incorporated into the LOMA or LOMR process. 6) With this new floodplain database, the County will provide floodplain inquiry services to homeowners, insurance companies, and lending institutions for a minimal fee. In addition, floodplain information will be published in the Countys web site for public use. 8.3 Acceptable Studies
Until the Director of DER and/or assigned designee determines an established date, a phase-in period will occur in which both private consultant engineering studies and studies using the Countys GIS-based floodplain models are accepted by DER. After that date, only the studies using the Countys GIS-based floodplain models will be acceptable, unless due to unusual complexity, the Director allows the study to be prepared by a private consultant engineer. 8.4 GIS-based Floodplain Submittals
The procedure/required information to request a floodplain study to be conducted by the County is summarized as follows: 1) Request in writing to the Programs and Planning Division of DER that a floodplain study be conducted by the County using the Geo-STORM models with the property boundary (lot/parcel) highlighted on a tax map or other map which clearly indicates the area of interest. 2) Once a letter is received, along with the floodplain study fee, (see Chapter 2 for Fee Schedules) the request will be logged in and a 2-week turn around time is anticipated unless there are extenuating circumstances or information is missing which precludes the study from being completed.
8-2
3) A County engineer will review the original request. In some cases, additional information may be required before the study can be completed. The County engineer will notify the applicant of any missing information. The existing or proposed stream crossing information necessary to complete the study is: Road profile; Minimum road elevations; Number of pipes; Pipe/culvert dimensions; Pipe material and type; Upstream and downstream maximum low chord elevations of each pipe; Upstream and downstream stream invert elevations of each pipe; Length of pipe/culvert; Number of piers; Pier shape; Width of piers; Headwall or wingwall type; Federal Highway Administration chart number for the culvert; and Federal Highway Administration scale number for the culvert.
The information provided must be surveyed and tied into existing County topography. In addition, if there is a proposed stream crossing, the location should be clearly shown in plan view. 4) If the study involves a balance of cut and fill, the area of cut as well as fill must be clearly defined. 5) Once a study is complete, a report will be sent to the applicant with calculations, crosssection locations and floodplain elevations provided. 6) If the floodplain elevations are determined based on the Countys GIS 5-foot topography, freeboard will be added. However, if the applicant provides more detailed topography, no freeboard will be added. 7) The floodplain will be delineated by the applicant on a detailed site plan and submitted to the Department of Environmental Resources for review and approval. 8.4.1 FEMA and MDE Acceptance
1. Both FEMA and MDE will accept the County approved GIS-based floodplain studies. 8.5 1) 2) Requirements for Private Consultant Engineering Studies Subject to approval by DER Consistent with applicable State and Federal regulations. For example, the water surface elevations as shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps will be the minimum acceptable water surface elevations for existing channel conditions. (Subject to approval by DER)
8-3
Stormwater Management Design Manual 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9)
Floodplain studies must be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice engineering in Maryland; sealed, signed and dated. Conform to criteria published herein. Conform to other requirements directed by this Department. Studies and supporting data become property of the County. Based on 100-year flood event. Based on the ultimate land use conditions as specified in the most updated zoning map/sectional map amendment within the watershed. Based on actual existing channel geometry obtained from either field survey or 2-foot topographic information. Assuming that sedimentation or scour may occur during the storm event is not acceptable. Valid hydrologic analysis of rainfall, runoff, and conveyance. If storage effects are significant, volume as well as peak flow must be evaluated. Subject to the approval of DER, floodplain studies for streams with a drainage area less than 50 acres may be exempted from the requirements of these criteria. Areas outside the property limits, which are affected by any water surface rise resulting from the development, must be acquired by applicant or reserved by acquisition of suitable floodplain easements. Consider backwater conditions, local obstructions and, where required by this Department, the partial or complete failure of any enclosed drainage system. (Consideration must be given to the overflow path, to ensure that no structure will flood in the event of system failure). All areas within a floodplain shall be dedicated to public use or for use as park, or as floodplain easement. Such dedication or floodplain easement shall be recorded on the land records of Prince Georges County, and such recorded documents shall denote that the floodplain easement may be used for utility lines, storm drainage facilities, or stormwater management facilities and shall include provisions for ingress and egress by authorized personnel. Existing uses in the floodplain may be floodproofed, but not otherwise expanded, provided this does not raise the flood elevation. Floodplain areas, based on studies meeting the criteria herein, must be determined to compute net tract area, cluster open space, or net lot area, for zoning purpose. FOR THIS PURPOSE ONLY, the floodplain areas of streams having watersheds of less than 50 acres may be excluded. Unless the approval noted in Item (12) above is granted by this Department, such areas are still subject to the study requirements of Subtitle 4, Division 2.
10) 11) 12) 13)
14)
15)
16) 17)
8-4
Stormwater Management Design Manual 18) 19)
Reduction of minimum lot areas under Cluster Zone provisions may have up to onethird of the reduction area in floodplain land. Must indicate whether any portion of the site lies within the danger reach of any existing or planned upstream dams. Where the project site overlaps a danger reach, the danger reach must be delineated on the floodplain plan, and all new structures must be located outside the danger reach. New residential development is not permitted within the designated floodplain areas, based on the proposed channel conditions.
20)
Floodplain areas which are to be left in an open and natural state shall be denoted on the subdivision plat as a floodplain easement, recorded in the County Land Records, even if they are to become a pubic park or recreation area maintained by a designated responsible public agency. The easement shall denote that such areas can be used for utility lines, storm drains, stormwater management facilities, open-type fencing and passive recreation and shall provide access by authorized personnel. With the exception of stormwater management facilities, structures shall not be built that would interfere with the flood conveyance capacity of the easement area. Any increase of the flood elevation due to the construction of stormwater management facilities shall require an additional floodplain easement. Note, floodplain areas already dedicated or owned by the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) will not require an easement. 8.6 Items (Data/Information) Needed from Engineer for Private Consultant Engineering Studies
The following items are needed from either the Developer or Engineer, when a floodplain study is submitted to DER for review: 8.6.1 Report
The report should include a general description of the project and a written summary of the methodology. As a minimum, the following information is needed from the Engineer: a. Floodplain Review Submission Form (see Appendix 8-1). Indicate permits sought (such as building, grading, site plan, final plat, etc.); b. Brief description of existing site conditions, including location and vicinity maps. Indicate the availability of existing studies (FEMA, SHA, County, etc.); c. A detailed description of proposed site conditions including a copy of the Approved Stormwater Concept Plan and Approval Letter; d. If channel modifications are proposed, include a copy of design plans; e. Explanation of all assumptions made in computations. Reference computational procedures and equations taken from manuals, books, etc. What the engineer may perceive as obvious may not be obvious to the reviewer; f. Source of the HEC-2/HEC-RAS cross-section information. (Field survey or topographic map etc.);
8-5
g. Methodology for determining the starting water surface elevation; h. Ranges of Mannings n values for both channel and overbanks, any assumptions used and a statement on how n values were determined; i. j. Provide a Summary of Elevations table for existing and proposed conditions; Include all existing and proposed channel conditions cross sections and profiles;
k. Discuss any environmental impacts due to the proposed floodplain impacts, and l. Any other pertinent information which will aid reviewers in expediting the review process (computer disks, correspondence, intra/inter-agency agreements, etc.) Hydrology
8.6.2
a. Drainage area map identifying each sub-watershed and flow path used for Tc calculation with segments labeled for both existing and proposed channel conditions; b. Back-up calculations for the runoff curve number and time of concentration determination; c. Soil map with sub-watershed boundaries drawn on it; d. Zoning map/sectional map amendment with sub-watershed boundaries drawn on it; e. Watershed Schematic; f. Back-up calculations for stage-discharge and discharge-area relationships for the channel routing rating tables;
g. Back-up calculations for stage-discharge and stage storage relationships for the reservoir routing rating tables; and h. Computer disk of TR-20 files for the project (if deemed necessary). 8.6.3 Hydraulics
a. Detailed bridge or culvert information including: bridge geometry such as opening, material, length, invert elevations, etc.; back-up calculations for bridge or culvert parameters to include those used on SB or SC cards of the HEC-2 model; road profile; inlet control vs. outlet control computation;
b. Computer disk consisting of HEC-2 input files for the project (if necessary); and c. Floodplain maps indicating location of HEC-2 cross sections, flood elevations (existing and proposed) at each cross-section, floodplain boundary (existing and proposed), proposed changes of the stream, houses, etc.
8-6
Stormwater Management Design Manual 8.7 8.7.1 Review Criteria Hydrology
a. Drainage Area Maps The drainage area maps should show existing and proposed topography with sub-watersheds delineated. (As a minimum, USGS, or M-NCPPCs topographic map should be used.) b. Runoff Curve Numbers The RCN should be computed based on ultimate land use taken from the most recent zoning map/sectional map amendment or utilizing the proposed development plan for on-site area and the soil types based on the Prince Georges County Soil Survey or boring longs. (Making the assumption that the land will remain undeveloped is unacceptable.) c. Time of Concentration The travel time method should be used following the procedures outlined in Chapter 3 of the June, 1986 edition of TR-55 Computations and should include the following: The flow path and segments used to determine the Tc for each sub-watershed should be clearly identified on the drainage area map. P100=7.4 inches should be used in the equation to determine sheet flow travel time. The sheet flow length should not be more than 100 feet. Mannings n factor for sheet flow should reflect ultimate land use condition (for existing and proposed channel conditions). Computations must be provided for determination of channel flow velocity. When available, the velocity should be taken from HEC-2, HEC-RAS or HY-8.
d. Rating Tables for Channel Routing Rating tables for stage-discharge and stage-end area relationships should be generated from reliable hydraulic analysis such as HEC-2/HEC-RAS modeling. (Identify sections used). Using Mannings equation to determine stage-discharge relationship is not acceptable because it assumes that backwater effects do not exist. Rating tables must be adjusted to reflect proposed channel conditions.
e. Rating Tables for Reservoir Routing Stage-discharge computations can be generated by using HEC-2, HEC-RAS, HY-8 or FHWA HDS No. 5. Stage discharge computations for reservoir control structures must (where applicable) take into account submergence of weirs, slots, and orifices due to tailwater. (see Chapter 4 for more detail)
8-7
The most recent and updated topographic information should be used to determine stage-storage relationship. M-NCPPCs 5-ft. topographic map is minimum. If 2-ft. topographic maps are available, they should be used. Elevation interval between A1 and A2 should not be greater than 2.0 feet when the following equation is used to estimate available storage: S = (A1 + A2)/2 x H
f.
The flood elevation calculated from the TR-20 run and the predicted flood elevation calculated from the HEC-2 run must be within 0.5 foot. Rating tables must reflect the proposed channel conditions.
Storm Events The 24-hour rainfall amount for the 100-year storm event in Prince Georges County is 7.4 inches. Use rainfall distribution Table II and Antecedent Moisture Condition II.
g. TR-20 Standard Control The network must be reflective of the drainage area maps. Reach lengths should reflect the floodplain length if flow is primarily overbank or channel length if flow is primarily in the channel. Reach lengths used in the TR-20 must agree with those shown on topographic maps and reflected in the HEC-2 runs. Input data used in TR-20 run must be consistent with the back-up calculations generated for: Drainage Area Runoff Curve Number Time of Concentration Rating Tables for both Channel & Reservoir Routines Final drainage areas generated by TR-20 must reflect actual watershed drainage areas. Hydraulics
8.7.2
a. Loss Coefficients Mannings n values should reflect actual field conditions. The composite or equivalent coefficient of roughness of any cross section should not be averaged for the wetted perimeter of the cross section. Refer to HEC-2 Users Manual FHWA HDS No. 5 for computation of composite Mannings n values. Proper expansion and contraction coefficients should be used. Adjust the value of loss coefficients at abrupt transitions in the channel reach. If NH cards are used, the same stations must appear on the GR cards.
8-8
b. HEC-2 Cross Sections HEC-2 cross sections should be generated from field survey or two-foot topography. Cross sections taken from M-NCPPCs 5-foot topography are unacceptable. c. Starting Water Surface Elevation - When available, known water surface elevation should be used as the starting water surface elevation. Water surface elevations can be obtained from the following sources, whichever is the highest: Most recently approved FEMA study (with approval from DER) Comprehensive Watershed Management Study prepared by Prince Georges Countys Stormwater Management Technical Group (SWMTG). Studies have been completed for Western Branch, Tinkers Creek, Piscataway Creek, Henson Creek, Oxon Run, Charles Branch, Beaverdam Creek and Anacostia River Watersheds. Previously approved 100-year floodplain studies. The Engineer should contact DER directly to inquire about the availability and acceptability of floodplain study.
If a known WSEL is unavailable, engineer should extend the study downstream to the nearest structure (road, pond, etc.) that would have a backwater impact. As a last resort, the HEC-2 slope area method should be used to compute normal depth. When the slope area method is utilized the study should be extended a minimum of 500 feet downstream of the site (MNCPPCs 5 topo is acceptable for offsite areas). If the computed WSEL is assumed to be critical depth, the STRT and WSEL on J1 card and/or Mannings n value should be adjusted to yield a non-critical depth elevation. d. Bridge Modeling Headwater elevation at bridges/culverts can be determined using the HEC-2 bridge routines, HY-8 or by hand computations. Due to their flexibility in handling different flow regimes, we encourage the use of the HEC-2 bridge routines. When using the bridge routines, the modeler should pay particular attention to the following: The normal bridge routine should be used to model low flow or completely submerged conditions, while the special bridge routine should be used to model pressure flow or pressure plus weir flow conditions. (Note, GR & BT stations must match in low flow condition). The HEC-2 assumes outlet control flow condition. Inlet control flow condition should be checked using the Bureau of Public Roads charts. If inlet control governs, an accurate water surface elevation should be input into the model using an X5 card. Topwidths at upstream and downstream face of bridge must be reasonably encroached. For pressure or low flow conditions, top widths should be the same as the bridge opening. For weir flow, top width should not be limited to the bridge opening, and velocity head should not be much more than 0.5 feet at upstream face of bridge. More detailed evaluation is required to verify adequacy of critical depth at bridge cross sections. For low flow or pressure flow conditions, modeling should reflect proper expansion of flow downstream of bridge and contraction of flow upstream of
8-9
bridge (page IV-15, HEC-2 manual). When the Special Bridge Method is used, no critical depth is acceptable at the upstream face of the bridge/culvert. Computations must be provided for SB or SC card parameters. Net area of opening (BAREA) and computed trapezoid area should correspond. If storage is considered behind the bridge, the flood elevation calculated from the TR-20 run should be reasonably close to energy grade calculated from HEC-2/HECRAS (maximum difference of 0.5) Should the engineer prefer to determine headwater elevation using hand computations, the Bureau Public Roads pipe/culvert charts should be utilized. It is emphasized that the outlet control charts assume pipe flowing full. Tailwater should be considered in analyzing outlet control. For low flow condition, the normal bridge routine must be used. The special bridge routine is the preferred method to compute weir flow. If hand computations are used, explain all assumptions (determination of C, L, and H) and document reference. e. Supercritical Flow For supercritical flow condition, due to large velocity head, the 100year floodplain delineation should reflect HEC-2/HEC-RAS energy grade elevations. f. Proposed Channel Modifications When channel modifications are being proposed, a HEC-2/HEC-RAS model must be prepared for both existing and proposed channel conditions. The models should extend upstream until water surface elevations converge. Offsite areas affected by a water surface rise must be acquired by the developer or reserved by the acquisition of suitable floodplain easements.
g. Stormwater Management Ponds Proposed stormwater ponds for the development which significantly impact the 100-year discharge should be included in proposed channel condition hydrology and hydraulics. The existing and proposed channel condition models should be as consistent as possible so that 100-year discharge can be compared at study points. For example, an existing channel condition model with two subareas and a proposed channel condition model with eight subareas is unacceptable. The discharge computed for existing channel conditions should be compared to discharge computed for proposed conditions at the downstream property line. Should proposed channel conditions discharge be greater than existing channel condition discharge, the floodplain study must be extended downstream of site to determine the increase in the 100-year floodplain. Computations based on existing land use and storms other than 100-year event are not required in the 100-year floodplain submittals. h. Divided Flow All notes and remarks in the HEC-2 output should be reviewed. Divided flow messages should be analyzed to insure that this is indeed the flow situation. If divided flow condition occurs for three or more cross sections consecutively, then separate profiles should be run up each leg of the divided flow as water surface elevations are not necessarily identical at each cross section. Refer to Application of
8-10
HEC-2 Split Flow Option, Training Document No. 18, April 1982, Page III-1, for methodology to solve island problems. i. Critical Depth - When the program cannot balance water surface elevation, critical depth is assumed for the cross section and a message to that effect is printed by the program. The engineer must verify the adequacy of all critical depth messages. The analysis should consist of: Check coding of GR points Confirm location of bank stations to ensure that they reflect actual field conditions. Locating the bank stations too far apart will cause too much water to flow in the channel, which generally has a lower Mannings n value. Additional cross sections may need to be inserted in order to preserve the assumption of gradually varied flow. Check topwidths at cross sections for realistic transition of flow between cross sections. Sensitivity analysis for increasing Mannings n value for channel and overbanks. Computer runs should be included in the submission package. If message occurs at numerous consecutive cross sections, the County may request that the program be rerun for supercritical flow condition. As a last resort, persistent messages should be explained.
j.
Floodplain Fill For all proposed fill, either permanent or temporary within the existing 100-year floodplain, the following items must be satisfied: Stormwater Management Concept Approval must be obtained for the proposed fill. An equal amount of compensatory floodplain storage is required to counter-balance proposed floodplain fill. A detailed site plan and computations showing a balance of cut-and-fill must minimize disturbance of the floodplain, and respect environmental features. Proposed fill and compensatory storage cannot result in an increase in offsite water surface elevations. A detailed hydraulic analysis utilizing HEC-2/HEC-RAS is required in order to determine the impacts of the proposed fill.
8-11
Floodplain fill for embankments of road crossings or stormwater management facilities may be acceptable without requiring compensatory storage. The embankments, in this case, must be crossing the main stream for which the 100-year floodplain is being determined. If the proposed floodplain fill is located within the FEMA Detailed Study Floodplain limits, then a FEMA map revision process will be required. Others
8.7.3
When all review comments have been addressed to DERs satisfaction, a floodplain approval letter for existing channel conditions will be released. After the first submission of a floodplain study for existing channel conditions, if the site meets the following conditions, DER will allow a freeboard to be added to the water surface elevations predicted by the submitted study so only one submittal is required. The conditions are: a. Drainage Area: drainage areas ranging between 50 acres and 150 acres. b. Proposed developments (building and disturbed areas) are substantially higher than any existing watercourses. This freeboard will be established by DER depending on the accuracy of the submitted study. If the proposed freeboard is not acceptable to the engineer/developer, the engineer can resubmit a revised study, which addresses all review comments.
8-12
Chapter 9 Quality Assurance
CHAPTER 9
9.0 9.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE Objective
To assure the quality of precast storm drain structures, water quality structures, and stormwater management materials installed in the County. 9.2 Suppliers
All manufacturers supplying precast storm drain structures, water quality structures and stormwater management material for private or public projects, must be listed in the Countys accepted suppliers list. An updated list is available from DER. A note, reflecting this requirement, would be added to the permit application. Applicants or Contractors should comply accordingly with the list of approved suppliers which is periodically provided by DER. Suppliers may be added to the accepted suppliers list by requesting approval from the County. The Manufacturer must submit the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) Letter of Transmittal Shop drawings,, sealed and signed by a Professional Engineer registered in the state of Maryland Structural computations Manufacturers in-house quality assurance program
In addition, the manufacturer must allow the County to conduct a Preliminary Plant inspection. Supplier approval is on a plant-by-plant basis. 9.3 Approved Materials
All reinforced concrete pipe should be manufactured accordingly to ASTM standard specifications; approved pre-cast structures are listed in the Prince Georges County Standard Details Manual. Any modifications, special designs or production of non-standard materials1 to either pipe or structures shall submit a shop drawing to DER for review and approval on a caseby-case basis. Relative shop drawings shall be sealed and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Maryland.
Non-standard materials: RCP greater than 72 in diameter, precast box culverts, vaults, storm drain inlets, etc.
9-1
Chapter 9 Quality Assurance
9.4
Materials Release
All standard storm drain pipe may be delivered to project sites without prior approval or official release. Precast structures should be approved first by DER prior to production. Suppliers should attach a materials certification letter with the delivered products for all public storm drain pipes/structures to DER and/or DPW&T in the following format: 1) 2) 3) 4) Contractors name and address. Project name and SD number. Manufacturers product certification. Type and quality of product as it appears on the approved storm drain/storm water management or public works.
The absence of the appropriate letter shall result in the As-Built plan not being approved and thus, delay any Bond release. 9.5 Site Inspections
Inspection of standard precast storm drain materials will take place at the project site and prior to installation. Decision to accept or reject any product would be made by the DER or DPW&T Inspector. Rejection will be based on ASTM and/or AASHTO standard specifications. Stamp each section of pipe designating its classification. 9.6 Plant Inspections
County representatives have the right to conduct random inspections at any approved manufacturing plant without prior notice. It is the designing engineers responsibility to insure the manufacturing quality of the proposed modified structures or specially designed reinforced concrete pipe. The County shall have the right to supervise the manufacturing process if deemed necessary or appropriate.
9-2
Chapter 10 Inspection and Enforcement
CHAPTER 10
10.0 10.1 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Purpose
This chapter establishes inspection and enforcement guidelines to be followed for inspections of stormwater management/water quality measures. Sections 10.3.0 and 10.4.0 of this chapter clarify the coordination and responsibilities between DER and DPW&T. 10.2 Scope
The guidelines are to be applied uniformly for inspection of private and public stormwater management/water quality measures. 10.3 10.3.1 Authority And Responsibilities Stormwater Management Inspectors
The Director is authorized by the Prince Georges County Code to inspect and enforce the requirements of Subtitle 4, Division 3 and 4 of this Code as follows: 1. Authorized to conduct inspections and file reports for periodic inspections as necessary during construction of stormwater systems to assure compliance with the approved plans and permits. 2. Authorized to furnish the permittee or agent the results of the inspection in a timely manner after the completion of each required inspection. (See section 10.5 Approval Stickers.) 3. Authorized to issue a Correction Order to the permittee or agent when any portion of the work does not comply with the approved plans and/or permits. 4. Authorized to issue a Notice of Violation in accordance with these guidelines as the result of unsatisfactory work or progress. 5. Authorized to issue a Stop Work Order as the result of unsafe conditions, working without a permit, unsatisfactory work, progress, or other non-compliance. 6. Authorized to issue a Civil Citation because of unsafe conditions, non-compliance with a Stop Work Order, unsatisfactory work, progress or other non-compliance. 7. Authorized to perform a final inspection upon the completion of the stormwater system to determine if the completed work is constructed in accordance with the approved stormwater design plan, approved As-Built plan and certified by the permittees registered professional engineer (or registered surveyor for storm drain plans only).
10-1
Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.3.2
Coordination Among County and Other Inspectors
There is full cooperation and communication between DER Inspectors, DPW&T Inspectors, Municipality Inspectors, and other inspectors to ensure full compliance of appropriate plans and applicable County Codes. 10.3.3 Inspection Responsibilities
On-site Stormwater Management Systems to be Privately Owned and Maintained and Off-site Stormwater Systems to be Publicly Owned and Maintained and not within County Street Rightsof-Way 1) Construction Inspection DER is responsible for providing inspections on private stormwater management/quality systems and public systems bonded by DER during installation and at completion. The owners/permittees engineer must also be present during the time of construction to certify As-Built drawings or any other certification required by the DER Inspectors. (Private roads in townhome developments will be treated as public roadways and therefore be inspected by DPW&T.) In those exceptional circumstances where the grading or building permit has been issued under conceptual approval only, installation of these stormwater practices may not, under any circumstances, commence until final design plan approval and any applicable permits have been secured for the applicable agency. 2) Final Acceptance Upon completion of the stormwater facility, the DER Inspectors will conduct a final inspection to see if work is constructed in accordance with the approved design plan. An As-Built plan is required for all publicly owned or maintained facilities. AsBuilt drawings are required to be submitted and approved by DER before final acceptance and within 30 days of completion of the facility. Letters of certification for water quality devices are to be submitted to the DER Inspectors prior to final acceptance. Certification letters for private storm drain shall be given directly to the DER Inspector. The permittee will supply to the DER Inspectors any operating manuals, gate keys, valve handles, etc. for any structures, equipment or apparatus associated with any publicly maintained facility. The As-Built plan will be filed by DER and/or DPW&T for use in conducting the final inspections. Prior to acceptance of the facility, all outstanding items must be completed. Stormwater Management Systems to be Publicly Owned and Maintained and Within County Street Rights-of-Way 1) Construction Inspections There will be DPW&T and DER Stormwater Management co-inspection responsibilities. DPW&T shall be responsible for the inspection of all stormwater
10-2
management structures within a street rights-of-way except for retention or detention ponds. DER Inspectors shall inspect the construction of all retention and detention ponds whether they are located in part or whole within a County street rights-of-way, inspection responsibilities shall transfer from DER to DPW&T at an elevation equal to one (1) foot below the subgrade elevation of the designed roadway section, whichever is lower. Any subsequent excavation and/or construction for storm drains or other public facilities within the County street rightsof-way shall be inspected by DPW&T or another agency that may have inspection responsibilities, including WSSC. The owners/permittees engineer must also be present during the time of construction to certify As-Built drawings or any other certification required by the DER Inspectors particularly for infiltration trenches. During the construction of all projects under the control of DER, the permittee shall be responsible for contracting with an independent materials testing laboratory. In the case of a publicly funded project, testing can be performed at the DPW&T laboratory. Testing shall include, but is not limited to soils and cast-in-place concrete. The permittee is required to supply the DER Inspectors with a professional engineer certified report as to the quality and compaction of said materials; this shall include actual test results whether performed in the field or the laboratory. Actual testing procedures are outlined within DER Specifications for construction. All rules and regulations set forth by DER with respect to quality assurance and quality control shall be adhered to. 2) Final Acceptance When said structure is complete, DPW&T and/or the DER Inspectors shall perform a final inspection and, if necessary, supply the permittee with a Correction Order. Stormwater Management Systems and Storm Drain Systems to be Publicly Owned and Maintained within the Street Rights-of-Way of an Incorporated Municipality within Prince Georges County 1) Construction Inspections DER is responsible for providing inspections on SWM/water quality systems bonded by DER within the street rights-of-way of an incorporated municipality. The owners/permitees engineer must also be present during the time of construction to certify As-Built drawings or any other certification required by the DER Inspectors. During construction, the permittee is responsible for contracting with an independent materials testing laboratory. Testing shall include, but is not limited to soils and cast-in-place concrete. The permittee is required to supply the DER Inspectors with a professional engineer certified report as to the quality of said materials; this shall include actual test results whether performed in the field or the laboratory. Actual testing procedures are outlined within the Specifications for Construction. All rules and regulations set forth by DER with respect to quality assurance and quality control shall be adhered to.
10-3
2)
Exceptions Inspections in the City of Greenbelt are as follows: DER will perform a final inspection only on the public storm drain. All remaining stormwater management/water quality systems will be inspected by DER throughout the construction phase. Inspections in the City of Bowie are as follows: Stormwater management/water quality systems (including public storm drains) in the City of Bowie are not inspected by the County Government.
3)
Final Acceptance When said structure is complete, the DER Inspectors shall perform a final inspection and, if required, supply the permittee with a Correction Order. If the appropriate municipality wishes to be represented during the final inspection, they shall coordinate final inspection with the appropriate DER representatives. At acceptance, the DER Inspectors shall complete the final inspection report.
10.3.4
Ponds Approved by Prince Georges Soil Conservation District
The Prince Georges Soil Conservation District (PGSCD) has responsibility through Maryland State Law to review small ponds. As-Built plans, certified by a registered professional engineer, must first be submitted to DER. Submittal to PGSCD will be made either by the Engineer or by DER in accordance with the Joint SWM Bulletin. 10.3.5 Other Stormwater Systems
Storm drain systems that discharge directly into a SWM facility, that are publicly owned and/or maintained, are an integral part to the street drainage system, and are not within the street rights-of-way: 1) Construction Inspection As a general rule, construction inspection shall be the responsibility of DPW&T to the first structure out of the street rights-of-way unless otherwise noted on the approved plans. Responsibilities of the permittee, with respect to materials quality control, are the same as those covered under Stormwater Management Systems to be Publicly Owned and Maintained and within County Street Rights-of-Way. 2) Final Acceptance When said structure is complete, DPW&T and/or the DER Inspectors shall perform a final inspection and, if necessary, supply the permittee with a Correction Order.
10-4
Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.4 10.4.1
Inspection Requirements During Construction Guidelines
The DER Inspectors and DPW&T Inspectors will conduct inspections at the request of the permittee or agent and at specified stages of construction for each stormwater management measure as shown below. The Inspectors also make unscheduled inspections to assure compliance with the Code requirements. The Prince Georges County, SWM Design Manual, General Conditions, Specifications, and Standard Details, SWM Bulletins, Field Notes, and MD-378 Pond Specifications, will be used during the performance of the DER Inspectors duties. 10.4.2 Field Changes
The Director may authorize the DER Inspectors to accept minor field changes proposed by the permittee or agent. A specific list of acceptable field changes will be reviewed periodically and updated for the inspectors use. 10.4.3 Required Stormwater Management Procedures and Inspections
The Stormwater Management Ordinance, CB-52-1984, requires certain inspection requirements during the construction of stormwater management/water quality facilities. Final inspection reports, As-Built plans, and certifications are required. The following outlines procedures, inspections, As-Built plan requirements, and engineering certification define inspection and the documentation requirements for stormwater management and water quality facilities. Inspection shall be requested at least 48 hours in advance by calling (301) 883-5390. When requesting an inspection, please enter storm drain permit number, type of inspection and your telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection can be made at a specific time of day. A copy of the Notice of Required Stormwater Management Procedures and Inspections will be provided during the preconstruction meeting with a DER Inspector. Additional information will be provided at that time. The owners and developers of Stormwater Management Facilities with Prince Georges County bonding are also subject to the requirements and conditions of Prince Georges County. The owners of basins which receive small pond approval from the Prince Georges Soil Conservation District (PGSCD) are expected to comply with the conditions of the small pond approval. The conditions of approval are signed and accepted by the owner prior to PGSCDs approval. 10.4.3.1 Drywell Or Infiltration Trench
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for construction of a DRYWELL or INFILTRATION TRENCH. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector. The inspections (except final inspection) are required at the start of each stage.
10-5
Stormwater Management Design Manual (1)
*PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review storm drain plans, discuss the purpose of the device, and answer questions regarding construction and/or inspection procedures. *EXCAVATION OF TRENCH Inspection required during the excavating phase to verify trench dimensions and to check soils for infiltration. Sediment control protection is required around each trench or drywell. INSTALLATION OF FILTER CLOTH An approved filter fabric shall be cut to conform to the trench perimeter. A six-inch minimum overlap is required between strips of cloth. Extruding tree roots or other obstacles must be removed from the trench walls and base to prevent the fabric from tearing. OBSERVATION WELL/SURFACE INLET INSTALLATION Well or inlet must be installed as specified on plans prior to stone placement. Perforations shall not extend beyond gravel trench. *BACKFILLING OF STONE Placement of 1 to 3 washed stone is to be observed. Bluestone is acceptable providing it is from an approved supplier, and is washed in accordance with Prince Georges County Specifications. Washed gravel is acceptable as well; recycled concrete is not acceptable. Care must be used when dumping the stone to ensure the filter cloth doesnt tear. The inlet pipe required for DRYWELLS also must be checked at this time. INSTALLATION OF FINAL COVER Gravel surface is to be completely covered with cloth and backfilled with topsoil for DRYWELLS. Surface inlets are to be constructed as stated on the plans. The observation well must be capped. *FINAL INSPECTION Upon grading and stabilization of the area, if the above items have been completed satisfactorily, a final inspection report will be issued and the job card will be initialed by the Inspector. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use & Occupancy permit from the Inspector. For privately owned and maintained systems, a certification letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer is required to be submitted to DER, prior to the final inspection. DER will require a certified As-built plan for privately owned and maintained systems if, as installed, the structure fails to comply with the design plan and or applicable codes or ordinances. For all publicly owned and maintained systems, a certified As-Built plan must be submitted and approved, whether or not the structure complies with the design plan.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Inspections shall be requested at least 24 hours in advance by calling (301) 883-5390. When requesting an inspection, please enter the Storm Drain permit number, type of inspection and your telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection can be made at a specific time of day. 10.4.3.2 Retention Or Detention Pond
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for the construction of a POND. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector. The inspections (except the final inspection) are required at the start of each stage.
10-6
Stormwater Management Design Manual (1) (2)
*PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review storm drain plans and answer any questions regarding construction and/or inspections. *CORE TRENCH EXCAVATION AND DEWATERING Excavation of core trench shall take place as specified on site plans. The side slopes shall be 1:1 or flatter. Removal of standing water within the trench is also necessary. *CORE TRENCH BACKFILL Fill material from approved designated borrow areas must be impervious and free of roots, stumps, wood, rubbish, stones greater than 6, frozen or other objectionable materials. Fill material shall conform to Unified Soil Classification GC, SC, CH, or CL and must have at least 30% passing the #200 sieve. Layers are to be placed in eight-inch thick maximum (before compaction) which are to be continuous over the entire length of the fill. The entire surface of each lift shall be traversed by not less than one tread track of heavy equipment or compaction shall be achieved by a minimum of four complete passes of a sheepsfoot, rubber tired or vibratory roller. A letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer certifying the installation of the core trench is required upon its completion and prior to beginning construction of the embankment. *CONSTRUCTION AND BACKFILLING OF PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY Inspections are required: a) on subgrade approval for principal spillway footing; b) after forming and placing reinforcing steel, but prior to pouring concrete for anti-seep collar(s), footings, walls, and top slab of the principal spillway c) when backfilling around the outlet pipe and anti-seep collars and; d) steel in endwall at outfall. A letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer certifying the installation of the anti-seep collar is required upon completion and prior to backfilling. Concrete cylinder break reports are required for all cast-in-place riser footings, walls and top slabs.
(3)
(4)
(5) (6)
*CONSTRUCTION OF EMBANKMENT Checks will be made on the compaction procedures. Allowance for settlement to the design elevation must be considered. *FINAL INSPECTION Final check of the pond which includes outlet protection and vegetative stabilization will be conducted. A final inspection report will be issued and the approval sticker will be initialed by the inspector. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use & Occupancy permit from the Inspector. DER will require a certified As-Built plan of the SWM pond, as installed whether or not the structure complies with the design plan or required Prince Georges Soil Conservation District Pond Approval, prior to the final inspection.
Inspections shall be requested at least 24 hours in advance by calling (301) 883-5390. When requesting an inspection, please enter the Storm Drain permit number type of inspection and your telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that inspections can be made at a specific time of day. 10.4.3.3 Storm Drain Pipe
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for the construction of a STORM DRAIN PIPE. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector.
10-7
Stormwater Management Design Manual (1)
*PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review site plans, discuss the purpose of the device, and answer questions regarding construction and/or inspection procedures. *INSTALLATION OF PIPE OR STRUCTURES Inspections are to be made during the installation of pipe and/or structures at the following phases: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) At beginning of excavation, to include subgrade inspection. During pipe laying and backfill, to include bedding material. Steel/rebar inspection Placement of precast or construction of cast in-place structures. Prior to finalization, system must be cleaned of all silt and debris as approved by the inspector.
(2)
A notarized copy of the pipe certification shall remain on the job site throughout the storm drain construction phase. A copy shall be given to the inspector. (3) *FINAL INSPECTION A final check will be made to check the dimensions and alignment of the structure. If construction is satisfactory, a final inspection report will be issued by the inspector. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use & Occupancy permit from the inspector. For privately owned and maintained systems, a certification letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer is required to be submitted to the inspector, prior to the final inspection. DER will require a certified AsBuilt plan for privately owned and maintained systems if, as installed, the structure fails to comply with the design plan and or applicable codes or ordinances. For all publicly owned and maintained systems, a certified As-Built plan must be submitted and approved by DER, whether or not the structure complies with the design plan.
Inspections can be made by calling (301) 883-5390 at least 24 hours in advance. When requesting an inspection, enter the Storm Drain number, type of inspection and your telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection will be made at a specific time of day. 10.4.3.4 Underground Detention System
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for the construction of an UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector. The inspections (except the final inspection) are required at the start of each stage. (1) *PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review storm drain plans, discuss the purpose of the device, and answer questions regarding construction and/or inspection procedures. *CONSTRUCTION OF DETENTION SYSTEMS Inspection(s) will be made during the construction of the detention system at the following phases: (a) (b) (c) Approval of subgrade for footings of pipe and inlet/outlet structures During pipe installation and backfill Inlet/outlet structure footings, walls, and top slab formed and steel set prior to pouring.
(2)
10-8
Concrete cylinder break reports are required for the footings, walls, and top slabs of all cast-in-place inlet/outlet structures. (3) *FINAL INSPECTION Prior to finalization, system must be cleaned of all silt and debris as approved by the inspector. A final check will be made to check the dimensions of the structure. If construction is satisfactory, a final inspection report will be issued and the approval sticker will be initialed by the Inspector. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use & Occupancy permit from the Inspector. For privately owned and maintained systems, a certification letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer is required to be submitted to DER, prior to the final inspection. DER will require a certified As-Built plan for privately owned and maintained systems if, as installed, the structure fails to comply with the design plan and or applicable codes or ordinances. For all publicly owned and maintained systems, a certified As-Built plan must be submitted whether or not the structure complies with the design plan.
Inspections can be made by calling (301) 883-5390 at least 48 hours in advance. When requesting an inspection, please enter the Storm Drain permit number, type of inspection and your telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection will be made at a specific time of day. 10.4.3.5 Hydrodynamic Separator
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for the installation of a hydrodynamic separator. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector. For example, sediment control measures may be required as a part of the sediment control, or to protect the future function of the separator and associated devices. (1) *PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review site plans, discuss the purpose of the device, and answer questions regarding construction and/or inspection procedures. *PLACEMENT OF HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR Inspections will be made prior to placement of the hydrodynamic separator to ensure the subgrade is firm, and any required bedding material is placed prior to installation. *FINAL INSPECTION A final inspection will be made to ensure the hydrodynamic seperator is installed and functioning as intended. Remove all sediment and debris from the hydrodynamic separator before requesting the final inspection. If construction is satisfactory, a final inspection report will be issued. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use and Occupancy permit from the Inspector. For privately owned and maintained systems, certification from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer is required to be submitted to the inspector prior to final inspection approval. This signed and sealed certification is to state the structure was placed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. A letter of certification from the manufacturer saying the structure was built to specification is required as well.
(2)
(3)
Inspections can be made by calling (301) 883-5390 at least 48 hours in advance. When requesting an inspection, enter your storm drain permit number, type of inspection and your
10-9
telephone number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection will be made at specific time of day. 10.4.3.6 Bioretention Systems
The following inspections as indicated by * are required for the installation of a bioretention system. Additional inspections may be required and noted by the inspector. (1) *PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING An opportunity to review the plans, discuss the purpose of the device, and answer questions regarding construction and/or inspection procedures. *CONSTRUCTION OF THE BIORETENTION AREA Inspections are to be made throughout the construction process including but not limited to: excavation of the area, placement of the sand bed, installation of underdrains, placement of the planting soil, placement of the plant material. Request an inspection for the day the bioretention excavation is to begin, and the inspector will make periodic visits to ensure proper construction of the bioretention system. *FINAL INSPECTION A final inspection will be made to ensure the bioretention system is functioning as intended. If construction is satisfactory, a final inspection report will be issued. The final inspection is required before requesting a Use and Occupancy permit from the Inspector. For privately owned and maintained systems, a signed and sealed letter from a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer is required to be submitted to the inspector prior to the final inspection approval. This certification is to state the biorentention system was placed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
(2)
(3)
Inspections can be requested by calling (301) 883-5390 at least 48 hours in advance. When requesting an inspection, enter your permit number and the applicable inspection code. If your inspection request is approved, you will be given an authorization number. Please make a note of this number. It cannot be guaranteed that an inspection will be made at a specific time of day. 10.5 10.5.1 Approval Stickers Purpose
The purpose of the approval sticker is to provide documentation of inspection approvals. 10.5.2 Scope and Applicability
Applies to all construction activities taking place in the County under authority of DER. 10.5.3 Responsibilities
The responsibility to obtain required inspections, and provide requisite certifications and asbuilts lies with the builder/owner/agent.
10-10
Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.5.4 DER Inspectors
The DER Inspector shall maintain the approval sticker with the field inspection file. Mark on the approval sticker the stormwater approval at each appropriate inspection date, and sign the entry. Do not use the approval sticker to note rejections, disapprovals or voluminous comments. Record approvals only. 10.6 10.6.1 Field Inspection Report Purpose
The purpose of the Field Inspection Report (FIR) is to notify the owner/permittee and or contractor/developer of construction deficiencies noted by the inspector, and to direct repairs and corrections. 10.6.2 Scope and Applicability FIRs are to be issued when the permittee or agent is directed to make changes to his/her work to satisfy County Code, approved stormwater design plans, or specifications. The notice will set forth the nature of the corrections required and the time allotted to make the necessary corrections. FIRs may be issued in case such as: 1) Failure to comply with the design plan: Incorrect measurements, using improper materials or failing to follow proper procedures can prompt the issuance of a FIR. FIRs would be issued in writing except when a verbal notice would result in immediate compliance as the work is being completed. Verbal notices shall be noted in the project file. 2) Failure to provide certification for stormwater structures: The DER Inspectors shall issue a FIR to the permittee/developer requesting certifications and/or As-Builts. A compliance date and a mailing address for sending needed information shall be supplied. 10.7 10.7.1 Notice Of Violation And Stop Work Orders Purpose
The purpose of issuing violation notices and stop work orders is to gain compliance with corrections orders issued and/or the Prince Georges County Code. Authority: 4-117, 4-351, 28-261.
10-11
10.7.2
Scope and Applicability
The DER Inspectors will issue a Violation Notice to a permittee/owner and/or contractor/developer or agent upon non-compliance of the County Code or Ordinance. In most cases a FIR is used for the first offense. Subsequent noncompliance with County Code or failure to complete the items on the FIR within a specified period of time will result in a violation. Violation Notices/Stop Work Orders may be issued in such cases as: (1) Failure to notify the Department before beginning any work to implement the stormwater design (including not requesting a pre-construction meeting): Any work that has been placed without a required inspection approval shall be certified in writing by a registered professional engineer before the next phase of construction begins. DER reserves the right to require investigative materials testing on all un-inspected facilities at the sole expense of the permittee/owner. Any deficiencies that need to be corrected for work already started shall be listed and given a compliance date. The permittee shall be notified to call for future inspections as required, as well as any additional inspections required by the inspector. A special investigation fee can be levied on work placed, partially completed, or concealed without obtaining the required inspection approval if the inspector feels that it is warranted. A request for a receipt showing proof of payment should be made before making further inspections. (2) Failure to have work inspected and approved before continuing work: It is required that inspection point(s) not approved be certified in writing by a registered professional engineer. DER reserves the right to require investigative or materials testing on all un-inspected facilities at the sole expense of the permittee/owner. A special investigation fee can be levied on any work placed, partially completed, or concealed without obtaining the required inspection approval if the inspector feels it is warranted. A request for a receipt showing proof of payment should be made before making further inspections. (3) Failure to call for a final inspection: List any deficiencies that need to be corrected, give a compliance date, and request a letter of certification and/or As-Builts (if required) be submitted. The permittee/owner or contractor/developer or agent should request a re-inspection after completing the corrections so another final inspection can be made. (4) Failure to provide certification for completed stormwater structures: If an engineers certification and/or As-Built is not received by the compliance date as required by a previously issued FIR, a notice of violation to the permittee/owner and/or contractor/developer firm will be sent requesting certification and/or As-Builts.
10-12
(5)
Failure to have sediment controls in place or improper sediment controls on stormwater systems: If excavation has been completed to final grade and no sediment devices are in place to protect the stormwater system and to prevent sediment from leaving area of stormwater system installation (i.e. storm drain installation), a violation will be issued with a directive to install them or correct them immediately or face a stop work order for the entire site at the end of the day.
(6)
Construction not in accordance with approved plans: If work is not corrected as required by a previously issued FIR, a Notice of Violation to the Permittee and/or his agent will be issued directing immediate repairs to the noncompliant work. A Stop Work Order may be issued until all work is brought into compliance. If work hasnt been completed by the compliance date, a violation may be issued stating that a Stop Work Order may be issued, and that the permit(s) for this site may be suspended or revoked and bond recalled if the work isnt completed by a new compliance date.
(7)
Working without a grading, building, or stormwater management permit: Issue a Stop Work Order directing owner to obtain a permit. The violation should state that failure to comply may result in the suspension or revocation of any remaining permits issued for the site and/or civil citations being issued.
(8)
Unlawful Continuance: The following amendments, additions, and/or deletions are made to Section 117.0 of the BOCA Code: The text of Subsection 117.2, Unlawful continuance, is amended in whole to read as follows: Any person, firm, association, partnership, or corporation, or combination thereof, who shall continue work in violation of the provisions of a Stop Order, or shall remove or cause to be removed a Stop Order sign still in effect and operation, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than One thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or imprisonment for six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment. (CB-121-1985; CB-97-1989; CB-63-1995).
10.8 10.8.1
Fee Imposition and Collection Special Investigation Fees
Special Investigation Fees may be charged when construction work has started without obtaining a permit. The fee shall be paid before an application may be filed to request the required permit. The investigation fee is $50.00 for residential construction and $100.00 for commercial construction.
10-13
The fee may also be charged whenever work under a permit that has been placed, partially completed, or concealed without first obtaining a required inspection approval. The fee must be paid before any further inspections will be conducted. 10.8.2 Re-inspection Fees
The inspector may levy a re-inspection fee of $25.00 when the inspector is dispatched to a site on a demand inspection and, the site is not ready for a specific inspection. There are mitigating circumstances where the re-inspection fee should not be lodged, however, as follows: Cancellation of an inspection request prior to the inspectors arrival. Cancellation of inspection must be made through the DER Dispatcher at 301-883-6030. 10.9 10.9.1 Civil Citations Scope and Applicability
Director may authorize the issuance of a Civil Citation by the DER Inspectors in the following situations: (1) When a FIR notice of violation and/or stop work order has not been complied with or there has not been substantial progress in complying with the violation and/or stop work order. On abandoned sites where no work has been on going, and continued noncompliance with a violation notice may result in the issuance of repeat citations. When a stop work order is in effect and work continues in defiance of the order. When repeated recurring violations of the same section of the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinances or the Stormwater Management Ordinance at the same location; or a violation of the same section of the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinance or the Stormwater Management Ordinance at a different location by the same responsible party. Each day that a violation remains uncorrected constitutes a separate violation of applicable code or ordinance. Citations shall be hand delivered when possible. When it is not possible, the citation shall be sent Certified Mail, return receipt requested. Owners, agents, permittees, lessees, builders, contractors, firms, corporations or partnerships listed on a permit application or tax record may be cited under this provision (Subtitle 28 (Civil Monetary Fines or Penalties)).
(2) (3) (4)
(5)
10.10 Complaints 10.10.1 Scope and Applicability Complaints as a result of SWM construction shall be referred to the associated area DER Inspectors. Complaints that are not in relation to on-going SWM construction will be referred to DER. Complaints relating to other Departments or Divisions will be referred to that agency.
10-14
Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.11 Maintenance Inspections 10.11.1 Purpose
The purpose of maintenance inspections is to management/water quality facilities remain functional. 10.11.2 Scope and Applicability
ensure
that
private
stormwater
Preventive maintenance inspections will be performed on stormwater management/water quality structures during the first year of operation and at least once every three years thereafter or as stipulated in the maintenance agreement. 10.11.3 Responsibilities and Procedures The owner of the facility will be contacted prior to the maintenance inspection. If the owner cannot be contacted, the inspection will be performed and a report will be sent to the owner. (1) (2) (3) (4) A correction order and/or violation notice will be issued for any maintenance needed. After a notice to comply is given in writing, a period of 10 days will be allowed for the owner/permittee to begin to make the corrections. If an imminent hazard exists, the Chief Building Official may use the emergency measures provisions of Section 121.0 of the BOCA Basic Code. Upon the owners failure to comply with the maintenance corrections, DER shall employ the necessary labor and materials to perform the required work as expeditiously as possible. The owner shall be assessed the costs of the work. The Associate County Attorney shall place a lien on the property, which may be placed on the tax bill and collected as ordinary taxes by the County.
(5)
10.12 Administrative Procedures For Submitting As-Built Plans The following information must be properly shown on all As-Built plans prior to acceptance by DER: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Job title. Words As-Built in or near the title block. As-Built certification wording and P.E. signature and seal. DER Permit number, City of Greenbelt permit number (if applicable), as well as DER approval and signature must be legible. DPW&T permit number as well as approval and signature (if applicable) must be legible. All sections of plan not pertaining to current As-Built submittal shall be crossed out. Each submittal shall be submitted with a separate transmittal. The transmittal shall include the following information: a) DER Permit number, case number, or DPW&T permit number as applicable for current submittal. b) Name, address, and telephone number of contact person.
10-15
Stormwater Management Design Manual c) 1) Name of project.
Number of Copies to submit: For Storm Drain Plan WITHOUT a Stormwater Management Pond: a) For Review Only - Transmittal - 1 Set of Storm Drain Plans (include previous review comments if it is a resubmittal b) For Plan Approval - Transmittal - 1 Reproducible Mylar - 4 Sets of Plan Prints to be Distributed After Approval as Follows: Engineer Department of Environmental Resources Inspectors Department of Public Works and Transportation Construction Inspector DPW&T Storm Drain Maintenance Division For Storm Drain Plan WITH a Stormwater Management Pond: a) b) For Review Only - Transmittal - 1 Set of Storm Drain Plans For Plan Approval - Transmittal - 1 Reproducible Mylar - 5 Sets of Plan Prints to be Distributed After Approval as Follows: Engineer Department of Environmental Resources Inspectors Department of Public Works and Transportation Inspector Storm Drain Maintenance Soil Conservation District
2)
10.12.1 As-Built Requirements - Infiltration Trench (1) Method of Documentation (a) (b) (c) (2) Drawn in ink and in a box on the approved mylar sepia of originally approved plan with changes noted. Enter the actual value beside planned values on the approved plan. Elevations to nearest 0.1 is sufficiently accurate, except where higher accuracy is needed to show positive flow. Types of materials. Approximate location. Diameter of infiltration pipe. Location and invert elevation of monitoring well. Pipe diameters and elevations must be correct. Infiltration material and filter cloth must be correct. Dimension and elevation of trench must be correct. Monitoring well must be located properly.
Minimum Information (if applicable) (a) (b) (c) (d)
(3)
Acceptable Construction (a) (b) (c) (d)
10-16
Stormwater Management Design Manual (e) (4) (a)
All manufacturers recommended practices must be followed. The following certification statement is required to be placed on the approved mylar sepia: I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge that this As-Built is in compliance with the approved design, and the infiltration trench as constructed meets the requirements of the Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Ordinance and/or the Stormwater Management plan. (SEAL) Maryland Registered Professional Engineer
As-Built Plans and Certification Statements
(b)
The As-Built plans must be submitted to the Department of Environmental Resources, within 30 days of the completion of construction. As-Builts must be reviewed and accepted prior to final inspection and subsequent bond release
10.12.2 As-Built Requirements - Retention Or Detention Pond/Basin (1) Method of Documentation (a) (b) (c) (2) Drawn in ink and in a box on the approved mylar sepia of originally approved plan with changes noted. Enter the actual value beside design values on mylar copy of the approved plan. Elevations to nearest 0.1 are sufficiently accurate except where higher accuracy is needed to show positive flow. Profile of the top of dam. Cross-section of the emergency spillway at the control section. Profile along the centerline of emergency spillway. Cross-section of the embankment at the principal spillway. Elevation of the principal spillway crest. Elevation of the principal spillway inlet and outlet invert. Riser diameter/dimensions, and riser base size. Type of materials used. Barrel diameter, length, and slope. Outfall protection as specified (i.e. length, width, depth, size of rip rap (d50 and class), and filter cloth). Proper size and type of anti-vortex and trash rack device (height and diameter, elevations and spacing). Proper location, size, and number of anti-seep collars. Diameter of outlet orifices or drain pipes. Show length, width and depth of pond and contours so that design volume is verified. Vegetative cover certification (95% minimum coverage). Fencing Certification if applicable.
Minimum Information (if applicable) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p)
10-17
Stormwater Management Design Manual (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (v) (w) (3)
Core trench limits and elevation of bottom of cut off trench (required during construction). Show length, width and depth and outfall rip rap. Elevation and location of Safety and Maintenance branches. Location and material of maintenance access road. Certification by a Geotechnical Engineer for compaction and unified soil classes. Show location of planted landscaping. As-buillt MD-14
Acceptable Construction (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Pipe diameter, length, materials and elevations must be correct. Orifice diameter correct. Trash rack, number of anti-seep collars and size are to be correct. Emergency spillway may be 1-2% steeper, but no flatter than design, and no nParrower than design and located and aligned as shown on approved plans. Embankment top elevation must be no less than design elevation plus allowance for settlement (as shown on plans). Top width and side slopes must meet design requirements. Show As-Built contours in two feet intervals. Riser must be as designed and trash rack must correspond to actual riser size. Must have proper relation between principal spillway crest, emergency spillway crest, and top of dam. (All elevations must be equal to the design elevations or relative to each other and the required volumes.) Must have an acceptable outlet (proper elevations, rip-rap size, length, filter cloth, etc.) according to the plan. Location of vegetation as per landscape plan. The owners of all basins which receive small pond approval from the Prince Georges Soil Conservation District have agreed in writing to the condition that: The project shall be constructed under the supervision of a registered engineer. Within 30 days of the completion of construction, the registered engineer that designed the structure shall provide DER with an As-Built plan and shall certify, with Engineers seal, that the pond was constructed as shown on the As-Built plans and meets the approved plans and specifications. (b) The following certification statement or a similar statement is required to be placed on the approved mylar sepia: I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge that this As-Built is in compliance with the design, and the pond/basin as constructed meets the requirements of the Maryland Soil Conservation Service- Maryland Standards and Specifications for ponds (MD-378) and /or the appropriate standards and specifications on the approved Stormwater Management Plan. (SEAL) Maryland Registered Professional Engineer
(4)
As-Built Plans and Certification Statement (a)
10-18
(c)
DER will forward a copy of the preliminary approved As-Built to the Prince Georges County Soil Conservation District (PGSCD) for review and comment. Joint approval for As-built submittals will be granted if no comments are received from PGSCD within 10 working days.
10.12.3 As-Built Requirements - Pipe System (1) Method of Documentation (a) (b) (c) (2) Drawn in ink and in a box on the approved mylar sepia of originally approved plan with changes noted. Enter the actual value beside planned values on the approved plan. Elevations to nearest 0.1 is sufficiently accurate except where higher accuracy is needed to show positive flow.
Minimum Information (if applicable) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Diameter and class of all pipe. Invert of pipe at outfall and at structures. Slope of pipe. Pipe lengths. Types of material. Location of all pipe and structures horizontally on the plan. Length, width and depth of all rip rap and other outfall protection as specified. Elevation of rip rap at outfall and at changes in grade.
(3)
Acceptable Construction (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Pipe diameters and elevations must be correct. Proper bedding and backfill of pipe and structures. Dimensions and elevations of all structures must be correct. All structures must be located correctly. All manufacturers recommended practices.
(4)
As-Built Plans and Certification Statement (a) The following certification statement is required to be placed on the approved mylar sepia: I hereby certify that the best of my knowledge that this As-Built truly represents existing field conditions including but not limited to sizes, diameters, line and grade, and elevations.
(SEAL) Maryland Registered Professional Engineer
10-19
Stormwater Management Design Manual (b)
The As-Built plans must be submitted to the Department of Environmental Resources, within 30 days of the completion of construction. As-Builts must be reviewed and accepted prior to final inspection and subsequent bond release. Note: Maryland Registered Land Surveyors can certify As-Builts for storm drain only, if the As-Built does not call for hydraulic or structural computations. In this case a Maryland Registered Professional Engineer certification is required.
10.12.4 As-Built Requirements - Underground Detention System (1) Method of Documentation (a) (b) (c) (2) Drawn in ink and in a box on the approved mylar sepia of originally approved plan with changes noted. Enter the actual value beside planned values on the approved plan. Elevations to nearest 0.1 is sufficiently accurate except where higher accuracy is needed to show positive flow.
Minimum Information (if applicable) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Sizes of all pipe. Elevation and slope of all pipe. Elevation and size of all orifices. Elevation and thickness of weir walls. Location and elevation of manhole openings. Types of materials. Location of structures.
(3)
Acceptable Construction (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Pipe diameters, elevations and classes must be correct. Proper bedding and backfill of pipe and structures. Dimensions and elevation of all structures must be correct. All structures must be located correctly. All manufacturers recommended practices. All cast-in place concrete constructed under approved practices.
(4)
As-Built Plans and Certification Statement (a) The following certification statement is required to be placed on the approved mylar sepia: I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge that this As-Built is in compliance with the approved design, and the underground detention system as constructed meets the requirements of the Prince Georges County Stormwater Management Ordinance and/or the appropriate standards and specifications on the approved Stormwater Management plan.
(SEAL) Maryland Registered Professional Engineer
10-20
(b)
The As-Built plans must be submitted to the Department of Environmental Resources, within 30 days of the completion of construction. As-Builts must be reviewed and accepted prior to final inspection and subsequent bond release.
10-21

SWMfinal

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

SWMfinal

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual 4.2.3

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual 10.3.3 10.3.4

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual 1.3 General Drafting Standards

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 2 Permit Processing

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual 2.6 Bonds

Chapter 2 Permit Processing

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 2 Permit Processing

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 2 Permit Processing

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 2 Permit Processing

Floodplain Service Fee

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

STORMWATER CONCEPT PROCESS

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual 3.4 Quantity Control

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual

Chapter 3 Stormwater Concept Plan

Prince Georges County

Stormwater Management Design Manual