January - February 2009

541-779-7709
VOL 30, Issue 01/02
See OBAMA
Continued on Page 9
be a two-year, nationwide effort to
jump-start job creation in America
and lay the foundation for a strong
and growing economy."
Obama noted the growing evidence
the country is "facing an economic
crisis of historic proportions" and said
he was pleased Congress passed an
extension of unemployment benefits
this past week. But, he added, `We
must do more to put people back to
work and get our economy moving
again."
Nonetheless, he said, "There are no
quick or easy fixes to this crisis, which
has been many years in the making,
and it's likely to get worse before it
gets better."
It will take support from Democrats
and Republicans to pass the economic
plan, Obama said. "I'll be welcome to
ideas and suggestions from both sides
of the aisle," he said. "But what is not
negotiable is the need for immediate
action."
People "are lying awake at night
wondering if next week's paycheck
will cover next month's bills," if their
jobs will remain, if their retirement
savings will disappear, he added.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,
D-Nev., said congressional Democrats
will "continue pushing for aggressive
but necessary measures. Part of that
is passing a substantial economic
recovery package, like the one
President-elect Obama discussed this
morning, that creates good-paying
jobs here in America and stabilizes a
volatile market."
In a slap at President George W.
By WILL LESTER, Associated Press
WASHINGTON President-elect
Barack Obama promoted an economic
plan Saturday he said would create
2.5 million jobs by rebuilding roads
and bridges and modernizing schools
while developing alternative energy
sources and more efficient cars.
"These aren't just steps to pull
ourselves out of this immediate crisis.
These are the long-term investments
in our economic future that have
been ignored for far too long," Obama
said in the weekly Democratic radio
address.
The goal is to get the plan quickly
through Congress, with help from both
parties, after Obama takes office Jan.
20. The plan, which envisions those
new jobs by January 2011, is "big
enough to meet the challenges we
face," he said. The president-elect said
he has asked his economic advisers
to flesh out the recovery plan one
"big enough to meet the challenges
we face. ... We'll be working out the
details in the weeks ahead, but it will
Madoff's Alleged $50 Billion Fraud Hits Other Investors
Bakken's massive reserves... and we
now have access of up to 500 billion
barrels. And because this is light,
sweet oil, those billions of barrels
will cost Americans just $16 PER
BARREL!
That's enough crude to fully fuel
the American economy for 41 years
straight.
They reported this stunning news:
We have more oil inside our borders,
than all the other proven reserves
on earth. Here are the official esti-
mates:
-8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
-18-times as much oil as Iraq
-21-times as much oil as Kuwait
-22-times as much oil as Iran
-500-times as much oil as Yemen
And it's all right here in the Western
United States.
HOW can this BE? HOW can we
NOT BE extracting this!? Because
the Democrats, the environmentalists
and the left wing republicans have
blocked all efforts to help America
become independent of foreign oil.
Obama Economic Plan Aims
for 2.5 Million New Jobs by 2011
See OIL
Continued on Page 9
by: Jon Stempel
and Christian Plumb, Reuters
"In today's regulatory environment,
it's virtually impossible to violate rules
... and this is something the public
really doesn't understand ... but it's
impossible for you to go - for a violation
to go undetected. Certainly not for a
considerable amount of time."
-Bernard L. Madoff, just over a
year before turning himself in for
perpetrating what may prove to be the
largest fnancial fraud in history.

New York - Investors scrambled to
assess potential losses from an alleged
$50 billion fraud by Bernard Madoff, a
day after the arrest of the prominent
Wall Street trader.
Prosecutors and regulators accused
the 70-year-old, who was chairman of
the Nasdaq Stock Market in the early
1990s, of masterminding a fraud of
epic proportions through his investment
advisory business, which managed at
least one hedge fund.
Hundreds of people, investing with
him through the frm's clients, entrusted
Madoff with billions of dollars,
industry experts said.
Madoff's investors
included captains of industry,
corporations - some of which
are publicly traded - that used
Madoff almost as a high-yielding
cash management account,
endowments, universities,
foundations and, importantly,
many high-profle funds of
funds," said Douglas Kass, who
heads hedge fund Seabreeze
Partners Management.
"It appears that at least $15
billion of wealth, much of which
was concentrated in southern
Florida and New York City, has
gone to 'money heaven,'" he
said.
Federal agents arrested Madoff
at his apartment on Thursday
after prosecutors said he told
senior employees that his money
management operations were "all
just one big lie" and "basically, a
giant Ponzi scheme."
A Ponzi scheme is an illegal
investment vehicle that pays off
old investors with money from new
ones, and is dependent on a constant
stream of new investment. Because
the invested capital is not earning
a suffcient return on its own, such
schemes eventually collapse under
their own weight.
Madoff is the founder of Bernard
L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC,
a market-making frm he launched
in 1960. His separate investment
advisory business had $17.1 billion
of assets under management.
"Business As Usual?"
About a dozen angry investors
gathered on Friday in the lobby of
the Lipstick Building in midtown
Manhattan, where the market-making
frm and advisory business are
headquartered, demanding to know
the fate of their money.
One woman said that when she
called the frm's offces on Thursday
she was told it was "business as
usual."
Another investor groused, "Business
as usual? Of course it's business as
usual. We're getting screwed left and
right."
Police later evicted the small group
from the building.
Individual investors were feeling
the squeeze elsewhere.
"I expect to get back zero," said
Floridian Susan Leavitt, who invested
through Madoff. "When he tells the
feds he has $200 million to $300
million left out of billions, what can
you expect?"
Two law frms, Milberg LLP and
Seeger Weiss LLP, said Friday they had
See MADOFF
Continued on Page 15
Bernard Madoff, pictured here, may
be the biggest fnancial securities
scammer by operating a Ponzi scheme,
aside from social security.
After the revelation of a massive fraud scheme, a former government investigator has accused government law enforcement offcials of repeatedly
turning a blind eye to Wall Street crime and, in doing so, allowing the foundational trust of the global fnancial system to crumble. Bernard L.
Madoff, founder of Madoff Investment Securities LLC and former Nasdaq chairman, was arrested for running a $50 billion fraud scheme touching
hundreds of companies and individual investors. World-wide, investors are scrambling to calculate their losses.
OIL IN USA? U.S. Oil Discovery
- Largest Reserve in the World!
Stansberry Report Online
H
idden 1,000 feet beneath the
surface of the Rocky Mountains
lies the largest untapped oil reserve
in the world is more than 2 TRILLION
barrels. On August 8, 2005 President
Bush mandated its extraction.
The U.S. Geological Service issued
a report in April ('08) that only sci-
entists and oilmen knew was coming,
but man was it big. It was a revised
report (hadn't been updated since
'95) on how much oil was in this
area of the western 2/3rds of North
Dakota; western South Dakota; and
extreme eastern Montana ... check
THIS out: The Bakken is the largest
domestic oil discovery since Alaska's
Prudhoe Bay, and has the potential
to eliminate all American depen-
dence on foreign oil. The Energy
Information Administration (EIA)
estimates it at 503 billion barrels.
'When I first briefed legislators on
this, you could practically see their
jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.'
says Terry Johnson, the Montana
Legislature's financial analyst.
'This sizable find is now the high-
est-producing onshore oil field found
in the past 56 years,' reports The
Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a for-
mation known as the Williston Basin,
but is more commonly referred to as
the 'Bakken.' And it stretches from
Northern Montana, through North
Dakota and into Canada.
For years, U.S. oil exploration
has been considered a dead end.
Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up
searching for major oil wells decades
ago. However, a recent technologi-
cal breakthrough has opened up the
2 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
Published Bi-monthly and sent
to Subscribers in every State
in the American Republic!
www.americansbulletin.com
Our Mailing Location Is:
The Americans Bulletin
c/o P.O. Box 3096
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Publisher/Editor/Director
Robert Kelly
Phone 541.779.7709
Fax 541.773.9574
Advertiser Dept.
& Affiliate Program
Joyus-Apollo Diamond
advertising@
americansbulletin.com
Bookkeeping Dept.
Marianne, Administrator
Message: 541.773.2756
info@americansbulletin.com
ISA Dept.
Kim, Administrator
Phone 541.772.4025
Note: Emails should be specifi-
cally only for that department/
person. Send all other emails to
info@americansbulletin.com
When leaving a message about
orders or problems please leave
a detailed information and dont
forget to leave your phone
number.
All Material which is mailed to or
received by TAB grants permis-
sion to reprint and becomes the
property of TAB. All articles
are considered for publication.
Due to space requirements we
reserve the right to edit articles
while maintaining context. For
orders and subscriptions please
send cash, or postal money order
(Pay To line blank or to TAB).
This paper is published on a
bi-monthly basis. Phone calls
are monitored for quality and
performance.
Thank you for your patronage.
The Americans Bulletin
is covered under
(c) 1998 common law copyright
DISCLAIMER
The Americans Bulletin is a forum through
which others present their articles on informa-
tive matters and opinions. The Americans
Bulletin and any staff does not endorse or
support every article, position, argument, or
product published or advertised herein.
We are not attorneys (nor would we want to
be one) and we do not practice law nor do we
give legal advice.
The Americans Bulletin will not be held
liable for any action(s) resulting from articles,
information or advertisements published in
this paper.
The Americans Bulletin supports its right to
inform and educate its subscribers and readers
of any information it deems necessary which
might assist such reader in becoming more
informed, educated and competent in his/her
own private matters and dealings with govern-
ment and its agents.
By receiving and/or reading this paper, the
reader fully accepts the terms of this disclaimer
and agrees not to take any action whatsoever
against The Americans Bulletin or any of its
staff or volunteers.
Any information published or presented
herein is not intended to be anti-government,
tax protesting or the like.
The Americans Bulletin advocates that
one should pay all lawful taxes that one is
required by Law to pay and obey all laws to
which one is subject. It is up to the individual
to determine if he/she is mandated to pay or is
subject. The Americans Bulletin advocates if
you are the Creditor, then by all means, accept
the fine, fee, or tax for value and discharge
the same.
All books and materials advertised herein are
for educational purposes only and are tendered
via donation.
The Americans Bulletin does not gather
information to be used against our subscribers
by any government entity, to our knowledge.
No man or woman, person, entity or
otherwise may speak for or represent The
Americans Bulletin in any capacity without
the prior written consent or authorization from
the editor.
Those who carry Americans Bulletin Press
Cards are independent investigative reporters
only and are not employees of The Americans
Bulletin.
WRITE HARD DIE FREE!
THE ONLY
AMERICA
FIRST,
TRUTH
EXPOSING,
WAKE UP
AND SMELL
THE COFFEE,
FREE PRESS
PAPER,
FOR THE
SOVEREIGN
AMERICAN
PEOPLE!
PLEASE
SUBSCRIBE
TODAY!
SUBSCRIPTION EXPIRED?
The Date behind your Name is the
EXPIRATION DATE! Renew Early
Dont Miss Upcoming Issues
CHECK YOUR MAILING LABEL!
Dear Subscribers and Readers:
W
ell here we are again at the end of one year and the beginning of yet another. Yet this
time the national landscape is different.

Were involved in a continuing U.S. bankruptcy, the country is in a recession, and had been
for quite some time but the underlying ramifications, is that things are going to get a lot
worse.

Also, for first time in American history, we have different kind a feller thats going to be
President, you know, Chief Financial Officer of a de-facto bankrupt corporation (U.S.A., Inc., )
a nonprofit Delaware Corporation, file number 2193946.

The question is, will Obama do what is right for America? Some believe so and yet others
foresee a continuation of the socialist program of the advancing of the New World Order, and
with the economy as it is and as it continues, the haves will get more and have nots, well
you know the story! As scripture says, Ye shall know them by their fruit! So its a wait and
see, hopefully not an Obamanation towards a negative degree.
As we bring this issue to print, we close the 29th year of publication of a truly Free Press
freedom-based newspaper within the Freedom Movement for patriots, freedom-fighters,
secured party creditors and overall for Americans.
But as usual, overall support from the same is lacking. Maybe its due to the electronic
age, but none-the-less, the probability is that a true Free Press (not controlled by big corpo-
rations) newspaper that publishes articles to inform and educate on rights, taxes, licensing,
right to travel, the bankruptcy, money issues, Redemption, and a host of others, plus articles
and information to help and aid in solving problems will soon be a thing of the past.
We hope to continue in the battle to free the minds of the people and be a voice of the
First Amendment Forum for a Free Thinking People!
So as we flip over to 2009, all of us here at TAB wish all of our subscribers, advertisers,
readers and supporters warm Christmas Wishes and a Happy New Year under the situation
of the economy.
Well catch you on the flip-flop, stay warm, Take care and may God bless this land and
guide and protect all of you.
Robert Kelly

Director & Editor
Weve Simplified Our Process
To Make It Easier to Contact Us
Please select the ONE EMAIL ADDRESS that most closely matches what your need is
and send your email to it ONLY . . .
Thank you, TAB Staff
Advertising Department .................................... advertising@americansbulletin.com
Affiliate Program................................................ joyusapollo@americansbulletin.com
Article Submission ............................................ articles@americansbulletin.com
Book Orders....................................................... bookorders@americansbulletin.com
CAFV & TORT Claims........................................ cafv-tort@americansbulletin.com
General Information........................................... info@americansbulletin.com
International Sovereigns Association ............ isa@americansbulletin.com
Order Processing/Shipping.............................. fulfillment@americansbulletin.com
Prisoner Issues.................................................. prisonerissues@americansbulletin.com
Receptionist ....................................................... frontdesk@americansbulletin.com
Subscriptions..................................................... subscriptions@americansbulletin.com
Web Master......................................................... jason@americansbulletin.com
* If you have emailed us within the past month and have not heard from us Please send us your
email again. We have had some technical issues with our email that are now resolved.


Redemption Service become Secured Party
Creditor/private banker take control of the Debtor, the collateral
and the property!
Conditional Acceptance for Value Processing
Private Administrative Process to resolve a problem or obtain
stipulation, agreement and confession of the injury, fraud, etc.
Tort Claim Service Formal process to file monetary
claim for stipulation, agreement and confession of the injury,
fraud, etc., filed into Risk Management Office.

Call for information leave mailing address on the Phone!
Those incarcerated mail request for 3 in One Letter!

Call -1-541-779-7709
The Americans Bulletin
take back control B
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 3
Harper Oversees Loss of Sovereignty
US Troops on Canadian Soil in Civil Emergencies
Need General
Paralegal and or
UCC Work Done?
Contact:
Omega-17, LLC
c/o P.O. Box 536
Vaughn [ 98394 ]
Washington
Formally Paralegal
Services
1-253-884-5785
H He el ll lo o. .. .. .
For those of you who are
looking for errors or typos
to complain about, we have
included a variety of them in
this issue and distributed
them throughout the paper for
your reading pleasure.
We hope you like this issue of
T Th he e A Am me er ri ic ca an n' 's s B Bu ul ll le et ti in n
Enjoy
By Gary Morton

T
he Harper government has
remained true to its repu-
tation as the most secretive
government in memory. Our
government and the Canadian
Forces have kept quiet about
the new agreement they made
February 14 in Texas. This
agreement allows the militar-
ies of both countries to send
troops over the border during
an emergency.
Sadly the announcement
came from the U.S. military's
Northern Command. US General
Gene Renuart, and Canadian
Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais of
Canada Command have signed
the deal. Supporters describe it
as benign which is something
opponents do not believe
seeing it as a time bomb that
could destroy sovereignty and
be used against citizens.
In Canada the Council of
Canadians is campaigning
against the increasing
integration of the U.S. and
Ca n a d i a n
militaries. In
a CanWest
O t t a w a
Citizen news
report Stuart
Trew of
the Council
denounces
the secrecy
s a y i n g ,
"It's kind of a trend when it
comes to issues of Canada-
U.S. relations and contentious
issues like military integration.
We see that this government is
reluctant to disclose information
to Canadians that is readily
available on American and
Mexican websites"
In the USA websites and
blogs are buzzing with hostile
comments and opposition to
the deal.
There are bitter comments
such as I will not be ordered
around in my own country
by a soldier from a foreign
country
If any American troops come
into Canada, on this pretext,
they should be treated as an
invading army and attacked by
Canadian citizens.
One angry man said, Harper
just prostituted Canada to the
USA.
More serious concerns
include Posse Comitatus The
Ottawa Citizen report notes
that posse comitatus is a U.S.
law that prohibits the use of
federal troops from conducting
law enforcement duties on
domestic soil unless approved
by Congress. Canadian troops
wouldnt be subject to that
law.
In fact posse comitatus
has already been killed by
President Bush. Bush has
signed executive orders giving
him sole authority to impose
martial law, suspend habeas
corpus and ignore the Posse
Comitatus Act. Real fears of
US citizens are that Canadian
troops could be used in an
unjustifed Bush declaration of
martial law and roundup of so-
called dissidents.
Many see it as another blow
to the Constitution and another
loss in the area of civil liberties
following on the heels of things
like the Patriot Act, the Military
Commi ssi ons
Act, the loss of
habeas corpus
and state
control over
the National
Guard.
Residents on
both sides of
the border are
seeing this as
another big step towards the
Security Prosperity Partnership
that would see the integration
of the US, Canada and Mexico.
They believe a North American
Union is underway in integrating
the highway and rail systems of
Canada, Mexico and the United
States. Protests are already
happing in Texas over the
feared NAFTA superhighway,
a humongous 10 lane monster
the width of several football
felds, which they believe will
stretch trucks, railway, power
and communications grid lines
from Mexico to Toronto. On top
of that the groundwork is now
being laid to combine the three
military forces and in the end
well have the Amero instead of
dollars.
Two more US motives
mentioned are the protection
of the oil supply to the US and
possible aid for the Canadian
government if Quebec
separates. Oil is an interesting
issue. Canadian opponents to
the SPP have noted that Canada
has no national plan to protect
its own oil supplies. Will this
mean that any unrest or minor
crime near oil installations
could draw American troops
onto our soil?
In police integration people
have commented that U.S.
police agents can now carry
guns in Canada, and undercover
U.S. agents of the Border Patrol
were seen monitoring the Six
Nations standoff at Caledonia.
Some Americans and
Canadians fear US Secretary
of Homeland Security Michael
Chertoff. Mentioning that a vast
electronic control net covering
the US (the HSIN) is nearly
complete. It includes 53 major
urban areas, local offcials and
THE GLOBAL POVERTY ACT
A
ccording to David Bossie,
President of the group
'Citizens United for American
Sovereignty', based out of
Merrifield Virginia, website:
www.citizensunited.org, the
above- mentioned Senate Bill
(S. 2433) is a piece of leg-
islation in the works that all
Americans need to know about
and know now!
This bill, sponsored by
none other than Sen. Barack
Obama, with the backing
of Joe Biden on the Foreign
Relations Committee, and
liberal democrats in Congress,
is nothing short of a massive
giveaway of American wealth
around the world, and a
betrayal of the public trust,
because, if passed, this bill
would give over many aspects
of our sovereignty to the
United Nations.
The noble sounding name
of this bill, 'The Global Poverty
Act' is actually a Global
Tax, payable to the United
Nations, that will be required
of all American taxpayers.
If passed in the Senate, the
House has already passed it,
this bill would require the U.S.
to increase our foreign aid
by $65 BILLION per year, or
$845 BILLION over the next
13 years! That's on top of the
billions of dollars in foreign aid
we already pay out!
In addition to the economic
burdens this potential law
would place on our precarious
economy, the bill, if passed
in the Senate, would also
endanger our constitutionally
protected rights and freedoms
by obligating us to meet certain
United Nations mandates.
According to Senator
Obama, we should establish
these United Nations' goals as
benchmarks for U.S. spending.
What are they?
THE GLOBAL POVERTY ACT
SENATE BILL S. 2433
Mr. Obama has already put together (in secret)
new legislation to further remove your rights.
The creation of a U.N.
International Criminal Court
having the power to try and
convict American citizens and
soldiers without any protection
from the U.S. Constitution.
A standing United Nations
Army forcing U.S. soldiers to
serve under U.N. command.
A Gun Ban on all small
arms and light weapons
--which would repeal our
Second Amendment right to
bear arms.
The ratifcation of the '
Kyoto ' global warming treaty
and numerous other anti-
American measures.
Recently, the Senate
Subcommittee on Foreign
Relations (where Sen. Joe
Biden sits) approved this
plan by a voice vote without
any discussion! Why all the
secrecy? If Senators Obama
and Biden are so proud of this
legislation, then why don't
they bring it out into the light
of day and let the American
people have a look at it instead
of hiding it behind closed
doors and sneaking it through
Congress for late night votes.
It may be only a matter of
time before this dangerous
legislation reaches a foor vote
in the full body of the Senate.
Please write or call, email
your representatives, the
White House, the media, or
anyone you think will listen,
and express your opinions
regarding this Global Tax
giveaway and betrayal of the
American people at a time
when our nation and our
people are already heavily
burdened with the threats to
our freedoms and economic
prosperity. Please send this
email to as many folks out
there in your networks as you
can. And ASAP!
IT'S ALREADY STARTED
FOLKS.BE AWARE OF
WHAT IS GOING ON.

T
he current strength of the
dollar is temporary and the
US currency risks a hard land-
ing in 2009, according to a
team of United Nations econo-
mists who foresaw a year ago
that a US downturn would
bring the global economy to a
near standstill.
In their annual report on the
world economy published on
Monday, the economists said
the dollar's sharp rebound
this autumn had been driven
mainly by a fight to the safety
of the international reserve
currency as the fnancial crisis
spread beyond the US.
The overall trend remained
a downward one, however,
refecting perceptions that
the US debt position was
approaching unsustainable
levels. An accelerated fall of
the dollar could bring new
turmoil to fnancial markets.
"Investors might renew
their fight to safety, though
this time away from dollar-
denominated assets, thereby
forcing the US economy into
a hard landing and pulling the
UN PREDICTS DOLLAR COLLAPSE IN 2009
FINANCIAL TIMES AND THEN SOME !!!!
global economy into a deeper
recession," the report said.
Publication of the annual
survey by the UN's Department
of Economic and Social Affairs,
its trade organization Unctad
and UN regional bodies, was
brought forward by a month
in the light of the fnancial
crisis. It was launched in
Doha to coincide with the
UN-sponsored development
fnancing conference in the
Qatari capital.
The UN team said that, as the
fnancial crisis spread beyond
the US, there had been a
massive shift of global fnancial
assets into US Treasury bills,
driving their yields almost to
zero and pushing the dollar
sharply higher. At the same
time, however, the US's
external debt had risen to new
heights that could provoke a
dollar collapse.
The report recommends
reform of the international
reserve system away from
almost exclusive reliance
on the dollar and towards a
globally backed multi-currency
system.
Rob Vos, a Dutch economist
who heads the UN's policy
and analysis division and who
is responsible for the annual
economic review, said the
global economic pain could
be eased if governments co-
ordinated a spate of stimulus
packages that were already
under way.
"There has been a sea
change in attitudes in favor
of intervention and concerted
action," he told the Financial
Times. He welcomed
statements from US president-
elect Barack Obama's transition
team in support of spending
on infrastructure.
h t t p : / / p i mp i n t u r t l e .
com/2008/12/02/un-predicts-
dollar-collapse-in-2009.aspx

offcials from Britain, Canada

and Australia. Chertoff is known
to be paranoid in regards to
Canada. He has spoken about
his deep fears on the terrorist
threat he sees coming from
Canada. Meaning its a genuine
concern that Canada could
end up under the power of
US Homeland Security. They
will run the surveillance net
and tell our politicians what a
civil emergency is US troops
and an array of anti terrorist
intelligence agents will then
arrive on Canadian Soil.
Corporate media in both
nations is paying little or no
attention to this issue, even
though it should be discussed,
and an election issue in both
nations.
In Canada, again sadly,
there is little hope of the
Conservatives or the Liberals
doing anything other than to
sell Canada even deeper into
the control of the US national
security web.

Don't Miss A Single Issue

SUBSCRIBE
TODAY
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OFFICERS
OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY
Common Tyrants
and Public Oppressors

VITAL LINK FOR ALL HOMEOWNERS

www.StopEveryForeclosure.org
4 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICAN'S BULLETIN
By Bob Worn, Major
- USAF (Retired)
I
n the course of recent his-
tory there have occurred
numerous events which give
rise to our urgent concern as
to where your immediate loy-
alty lies. Is it with the People
of the several united States of
America, or is it to the would-
be Commander in Chief, the
president elect and to the
Supreme Court of the United
States?
Because of numerous
apparently erroneous decisions
made by the Supreme Court
in the near past, decisions
that were more political than
constitutional, there is a well-
seated concern regarding
their decision on a very
serious allegation before them
today. The concern is that the
president-elect in the person
of Barak Hussein
Obama is not qualifed to
fll the offce of President of
the United States and that
of Commander-In-Chief of
the military forces of this
great nation because of
constitutional restrictions for
the candidate to that high
offce. It is a question of his
status as a natural born citizen
of these United States.
If the Supreme Court makes
the correct decision according
to the Constitution of the
United States and fnds that
Mr. Obama is not qualifed
to that offce there will have
to be another selection to fll
the offce and give to you and
your fellow offcers a proper,
constitutional Commander-in-
Chief.
If, however, as anticipated,
the Supreme Court errs to
political pressure and allows
the faulted election of Barak
Hussein Obama to stand, then
you will have to make the
personal, serious decision to
act under your oath-of-offce
as a commissioned offcer of
the United States of America.
You cannot lawfully serve
under an unconstitutional
president. Any orders issued
as Commander-in-Chief will be
unlawful orders.
History is replete with
examples of the people's
worst enemy being their own
government taken over by
power hungry despots. I have
no reason to believe that
human nature has changed -
that given the opportunity, evil
men will impose their will upon
the populace.
The form of government
established by this Nation's
founders is one of Law based
upon absolute Principles, not
upon the whims of individuals
nor even of the majority of
the people. They wrote a
Constitution expressly limiting
the authority of the federal
government [ and State
government] and denying to
elected leadership unilateral
and unquestioned authority.
You are reminded that your
oath upon commissioning as
an offcer of this nation is to
the support and defense of
that Constitution against all
enemies, foreign or domestic
and through it, the people of
these several States. It is not
to obey a Commander in Chief,
whether qualifed or not. Even
less is it to obey the faulted
decision of a faulted court.
You are further reminded
that it is well established in
international law that following
the orders of a superior
authority is no defense in
your personal responsibility
for unlawful acts by you
as commissioned military
leaders.
It is with these points in
mind that I demand that you
make a personal decision
and public commitment
that, if and when you are
ordered to accept a blatantly
unconstitutional decision
that grossly damages our
constitutional underpinnings,
action against the people of
these several States or the
Constitution established by
them, you stand with the
people and their Constitution
to protect them from intrusion
upon the rights, their persons
and their property and to
defend them against all
actions, either violent or non-
violent, perpetrated by those
enemies, domestic or foreign,
whose object is the destruction
of the Constitution.
I call upon you to renounce
any action in violation of the
people or their Constitution,
and to bring to bear all the
forces under your command to
the protection and defense of
these high purposes.
In the Name of the Almighty
God, I fully expect you to
fulfll to the maximum your
obligations set forth in your
oath of offce - I will accept
nothing less.
Bob Worn, Major - USAF
(Retired)
1811 Shamburger Road
Gilmer, Texas 75645-2810
Our prayer For Today;
Our Dear and Most Gracious
Heavenly Father, please be with
us in our hour of need. Guide
us in seeing the correct way
to go, the wisdom to see our
correct path according to our
oath of offce as sworn to you;
please give us the courage to
that which must be done and
the leadership, in Your Name,
to have others follow us in our
task.
All this we pray in Thy Holy
Name and In The Name of Your
Son Jesus. Amen
As a post script; A Necessary
Review Of Our Oath Of Offce;
As you will remember, we all
took an oath that ended ",,,,
So Help Me God." Let's rely
on Him now when we need
His strength. As you know,
we did NOT take an oath
to fy airplanes, fght wars,
kill innocent humans, obey
the orders of an unqualifed,
unconstitutional president
or those of a congress that
collectively turns their backs
on their sworn oath.
We took one oath and one
oath only - to support and
defend the Constitution of
the United States of America
against ALL enemies, foreign
or domestic.
And then we asked God for
his help in fulflling that oath of
offce. Have you ever wondered
why, in our oath of offce, the
authors placed the word/term
domestic when referring to
future, real enemies of the
constitution?
I truly believe that we could
be seeing the reason today.
MY OATH OF OFFICE
AS SWORN BY ME ON 13
DECEMBER 1957

"I, Robert William Worn,
A03081165, having been
appointed a Second Lieutenant,
United States Air Force, do
solemnly swear (or affrm)
that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United
States of America against all
enemies, foreign or domestic;
that I will bear true faith and
allegiance to the same: that
I take this obligation freely,
without mental reservation
or purpose of evasion: and
that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties of the
offce upon which I am about
to enter, So Help Me God."

Editor comment; the military

is under subjection to the civil
power. The civil power is the
sovereign people in a collective
capacity, whereby they granted
certain limited and restricted
power and authority to so-
called government via elected
offcials. The sovereign people
via the intent of constructing
the compact (contract;
AKA constitutions) did not
place themselves inside the
compact. Paddelford vs
Savannah say that the private
man IS NOT a party to the
Constitution! Since our rights
came from our Creator and
not the State, as the State or
government CANNOT grant
rights, the sovereign people
are outside the requirements
of the private commercial
statutes of the State & federal
government corporations!
So we want the Military to
enforce the Constitutions
upon the administrative
governments from the elected
offcial down to the employed
public servant cop to the
janitor. And if we inform the
Military of constitutional
impermissible application of
statutes or laws WE the
people, then expect Military
intervention and military
justice as the presumption
is, that all so-call judicial
courts are non-constitutional
courts merely administrative
courts administering the U.S.
Bankruptcy upon the people
to collect revenue and the
continuing attorning the
property to the State! Onward
Military Christian Soldiers!
By Rev. Jonathan Mayhew
of Boston (1750)

I
t is blasphemy to call tyrants
and oppressors God's minis-
ters... When [magistrates] rob
and ruin the public, instead of
being guardians of its peace
and welfare, they immediately
cease to be the ordinance and
ministers of God, and no more
deserve that glorious charac-
ter than common pirates and
highwaymen.

In 1765, Pastor Mayhew
wrote:
The king is as much bound
by his oath not to infringe
the legal rights of the people,
as the people are bound to
yield subjection to him. From
whence it follows that as soon
as the prince sets himself up,
above the law, he loses the
king in the tyrant.
He does, to all intents and
purposes, un-king himself by
acting out of and beyond that
sphere which the constitution
allows him to move in, and in
such cases he has no more
right to be obeyed than any
inferior offcer who acts beyond
his commission.
The subject's obligation to
allegiance then ceases, of
course, and to resist him is no
more rebellion than to resist
any foreign invader... it is
making use of the means, and
the only means, which God has
put into their power for mutual
and self-defense.
After the repeal of the Stamp
Act, Rev. Mayhew said:
God gave the Israelites a king
in His anger, because they had
not sense and virtue enough to
like a free commonwealth, and
to have Himself for their king.
That the Son of God came
down from heaven to make
us "free indeed", and that
"where the Spirit of the Lord
is, there is liberty," this made
me conclude that freedom was
a great blessing...
And who knows, our liberties
being thus established, but
that on some future occasion,
when the kingdoms of earth
are moved and roughly dashed
one against another... we, or
our posterity, may even have
the great felicity and honor to
"save much people alive," and
keep Britain herself from ruin!

From the Preface of Dr.
Mayhew's published sermon:
It is hoped that but few will
think the subject of [this sermon]
an improper one to be discoursed
on in the pulpit, under a notion
that this is preaching politics,
instead of Christ.
However, to remove all
prejudices of this sort, I beg
it may be remembered that
'all Scripture is proftable
for doctrine, for reproof, for
correction, for instruction in
righteousness.'
Why, then, should not those
parts of Scripture which
relate to civil government be
examined and explained from
the Bible, as well as others?

T
icking someone off could
get you a ticket in one
Michigan city. The Brighton City
Council on Thursday approved
an ordinance allowing police
in the Livingston County com-
munity to ticket and fine any-
one who is annoying in public
"by word of mouth, sign or
motions."
The Livingston County Daily
Press & Argus of Howell reports
the measure is modeled on a
similar ordinance in the Detroit
suburb of Royal Oak.
A city attorney says there
could be situations where
the measure would violate
freedom of speech, but that
those cases will be reviewed
by the city.
The ban takes effect Jan. 2.
Editor Comment: It's only
for the money, a tax, revenue
collection... just life on the
Plantation ... nothing new!

Michigan City Bans

Being Annoying In Public
JEWS CONFIRM BIG MEDIA IS JEWISH
THE AMERICAN'S BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 5
By Rev. Ted Pike
J
ewish control of the media is
a taboo topic. In Congress,
among evangelicals and main-
line conservative talk radio, it
is never mentioned. It is dis-
cussed only in snatches on far
Right alternative talk radio.
This is astonishing,
considering that almost
every substantial library in
America contains a number of
books confrming such Jewish
control. These include Neil
Gablers An Empire of Their
Own: How the Jews Invented
Hollywood and Hoberman
and Shandlers Entertaining
America: Jews, Movies, and
Broadcasting.
These encyclopedic histories of
Jewish control of the American
media outdo any efforts by
so-called anti-Semites to
document an astonishing,
frightening fact: The majority
of media news and information
to the American public comes
from Jews.
An authoritative Jewish
website, Judaism Online,
(www. si mpl etoremember.
com) in its article, Jewish
Success in the American
Media, documents Jewish
media preeminence. It does
so not from motives of anti-
Semitism, but from Jewish
pride. Its 2002 list of many
Jewish superstars in the
media today is printed, in
part, below.
Of course, there are more
Gentiles than Jews in the
America media, as in America
at large. But notice how many
Jews are in control of media
giants. This helps explain
why the Jewish media is so
relentlessly anti-Christian,
constantly pushing immorality
and the liberal, Zionist political
agenda.
Why are Christians always
marginalized in flms and
TV? Why is the Palestinian
perspective not included in
the news? Face the forbidden
truth: the media speaks with
a Jewish voice.
Television Networks:
CBS:
Sumner Redstone - chairman
of board and CEO of CBS
and Viacom, "world's biggest
media giant" (Economist, 11-
23-02). Viacom owns Viacom
Cable, CBS, and MTV all
over the world, Blockbuster
Video Rentals, and Black
Entertainment TV
Mel Karmazin - CBS corporation
president and CEO
Leslie Moonves (great-nephew
of Prime Minister David Ben-
Gurion) - president of CBS
Television
David Poltrack - executive
vice-president, Research and
Planning
Jeff Fager - executive director
of 60 Minutes II.
NBC:
Jeff Zucker - president of NBC
Entertainment
Neil Shapiro - president of
NBC News
Jeff Gaspin - executive vice-
president, programming NBC
Max Mutchnik and David
Kohan - co-exec. producers of
NBCs Good Morning, Miami
Lloyd Braun - chair of NBC
Entertainment.
ABC:
M i c h a e l
E i s n e r
- major
owner of
Walt Disney,
C a p i t a l
Cities, and
ABC
David Westin - president of
ABC News.
FOX:
Rupert Murdoch (Jewish
mother, hence legally Jewish)
- owner of FOX TV, New York
Post, London Times, and News
of the World
Sandy Grushow - chair, FOX
Entertainment
Peter Chernin - second in
command at Rupert Murdochs
News Corp., owner of FOX TV
Gail Berman - president of
FOX Entertainment.

CNN:
Wolf Blitzer -
host of CNNs
Late Edition.
H o l l y w o o d
Movie Studios:
Ted Pike's
comment: The
p r e s t i g i o u s
Encycl opedi a
Judaica, in its
article Motion
Pictures, pg. 449, says:
Thus all the large Hollywood
companies, with the exception
of United Artists...were
founded and controlled by
Jews.
Sony Corporation of America:
Howard Stringer - chief
-Columbia Pictures: Amy
Pascal - chair
Warner Bros.: Barry Meyer -
chair; Jordan Levin - pres. of
Warner Bros. Entertainment.
Miramax Films: Harvey
Weinstein - CEO
Paramount: Sherry Lansing
- president of Paramount
Communications and chair of
Paramount Pictures Motion
Picture Group.
DreamWorks:
S t e p h e n
S p i e l b e r g ,
David Geffen,
J e f f r e y
Ka t z e n b e r g
(owners)
M T V
Entertainment:
Brian Graden -
president
T u r n e r
Entertainment: Brad Siegal -
president

Radio:
Clear Channel Communications:
Robert Sillerman - founder
PBS: Ben Wattenberg -
moderator, PBS ThinkTank
Publishers:
Ted Pike comments: The
Encyclopedia Judaica, in its
article Publishing, lists the
following publishing houses, as
of 1971, owned or controlled by
Jews: Viking, Knopf, Random
House, Modern Library, Simon
and Schuster, Harcourt, Brace
& Co., Greenberg Publishers,
Ziff-Davis, Crown Publishers,
Dial Press and Dryden Press.
Publishing houses either
founded by or with a Jew
as editor-in-chief include:
Farrar, Straus, & Giroux,
Abelard-Schumann, Basic
Books, Grosset & Dunlap,
Federal Writers Project, Gaer
Associates, Macmillan & Co.,
Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Citadel
Press, Chanticleer Press,
Arthur Frommer, Inc., Hart
Publishing Co., Lantern Press,
Oceanea Publications, Twayne
Publishers, Arco Publishing
Co., Grossman Publishers,
and Stein & Day.
Publishing houses involved
in book clubs, reprints, or
childrens literature either
founded by or controlled by
Jews include the Literary
Guild, Book of the Month Club,
Limited Editions Club, Heritage
Club, Junior Heritage Club,
Readers Club, Jewish Book
Guild, Military Science Book
Club, Natural History Book
Club, Book Collectors Society,
Art Book Guild, Science Book
Club, Beech Hurst Press, A.
S. Barnes & Co., Sagamore
Press, Thomas Yoseloff Inc.,
The Modern Library, World
P ubl i s hi ng
Co., Little
Blue Books,
Pocket Books
Inc., Avon
Publications,
P o p u l a r
L i b r a r y ,
S c h o c k e n
B o o k s ,
G o l d e n
Books, and
Golden Press.
In its article on New York
City, the Judaica adds to
the list of publishing houses
owned by Jews, Liveright &
Boni, and Anchor Books.
Today Random House,
Doubleday, and Anchor
Books, while Jewish owned
and controlled, participate in
the worlds largest publishing
consortium, Bertelsmann A.G.,
benefting from its staggering
distribution advantages. End
of Ted Pikes comments.
Bertelsmanns American
operations are headed by Joel
Klein, chair and CEO.
David Manaker is executive
director for HarperCollins
Newspapers:
Samuel Newhouse Jr. and
Donald Newhouse own
Newhouse Publications, which
includes 26 newspapers in
22 cities. The Conde Nast
Magazine Group includes
the New Yorker, Parade,
the Sunday newspaper
supplements, American City
Business Journal, business
newspapers published in
more than 30 major cities
in America, and interests in
cable television programming
and cable systems serving
one million homes.
Wall Street Journal: Peter R.
Kahn, CEO
New York Times, Boston
Globe, and other publications:
published by Arthur O.
Sulzberger Jr.
New York Daily News:
Mortimer Zuckerman, owner
Village Voice, New Times
and network of alternative
weeklies: Owned by David
Schneiderman
Washington Post: Donald
Graham, chair and CEO, son
of Katharine Graham Meyer,
former owner of Washington
Post
Weekly Standard: William
Kristol, editor, also executive
director, Project for a New
American Century, (PNAC)
San Francisco
Chronicle: Ron
Rosenthal, managing
editor; Phil Bronstein,
exec. editor
AOL-Time Warner
Book Group: Laurence
Kirshbaum, editor
Magazines:
US News & World
Report: Mortimer
Zuckerman, owner and
chair of the Conference of
Presidents of Major Jewish-
American Organizations,
one of the largest pro-Israel
lobbying groups
New Republic: Marty Peretz,
owner and publisher (NR
openly identifes itself as pro-
Israel.)
Barrons: Peter R. Kahn, CEO
National Review: Michael
Ledeen, editor
Business Week: Bruce
Nussbaum, editorial page
editor
Newsweek: Donald Graham,
chair and CEO, and Howard
Fineman, chief political
columnist
The New Yorker: David Reznik,
editor; Nicholas Lehman,
writer; Henrick Hertzberg,
Talk of the Town editor
Miscellaneous:
Ivan Seidenberg - CEO of
Verizon Communications,
Comcast-ATT Cable TV, with
Ralph and Brian Roberts as
owners.
Norman Ornstein, American
Enterprise Institute - regular
columnist for USA Today, news
analyst for CBS and co-chair
with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public
Interest Obligation of Digital
TV Producers, appointed by
Clinton.
Dennis Lebowitz - head of Act
II Partners, a media hedge
fund.
Barry Diller - chair of USA
Interactive, former owner of
USA Entertainment.
Kenneth Roth - executive
director of Human Rights
Watch.
Richard Leibner - head of N. S.
Bienstock talent agency,
which represents 600
news personalities
such as Dan Rather,
Dianne Sawyer, and Bill
OReilly.
Stephen Emerson -
every media outlets
frst choice as an expert
on domestic terrorism.
Terry Semel - CEO of
Yahoo!, former chair,
Warner Bros.
Mark Golin - VP and creative
director for AOL.
Ari Fleischer - Bushs former
press secretary
Warren Lieberford - president
of Warner Bros. Home Video
Division of AOL-Time Warner.
Ted Pike comments:
Judaism Onlines list
presents only the most
outstanding, well-recognized
Jews in the American media.
I could name hundreds more
from the top ranks of Jewish
media leadership. Such names
are readily available from
corporate directories such as
Standard and Poor's and Lexis
Nexus.
Yes, some of the Jewish
superstars listed above are
political conservatives. Yet
studies of top-level Jewish
media executives prove they
are overwhelming
liberal. The famous
Lichter-Rothman poll
in the early 1980s
found that top media
executives were
radically out of step
with the moral values
of the American
public.
97% affrm a
woman's right to an abortion
if she pleases. 80% disagree
that homosexuality is wrong.
86% believe homosexuals
have the right to be
schoolteachers. 51% believe
adultery is permissible. Of 104
top executives polled, 59%
were "raised in the Jewish
religion."
Does it matter who
dominates the media? It
does! The media shapes not
only our children's values
and actions but our own. The
Jewish media has normalized
sexual degeneracy, profanity
and all kinds of sin. It also
leads us into war to make the
Mid-East safe for Israel. This
happened in Afghanistan, Iraq
and, tomorrow, Iran.
If an anti-Christian agenda
were being advanced by
Moonies or Scientologists,
dominating the most powerful
positions of media leadership
in America, there would be
a howl of protest. Americans
would demand Congressional
hearings and investigations.
But because the Jewish media
has forbidden identifcation of
itself as Jewish, vilifying such
as anti-Semitism, a deafening
silence prevails.
Meanwhile, relentless evil
continues to control the spigot
of information from which
America drinks.
Rev. Ted Pike is director of
the National Prayer Network,
a Christian conservative
watchdog group.
For many more articles
on the dangers of Jewish
activism, come to www.
truthtellers.org.
TALK SHOW HOSTS: For
interview with Ted Pike on this
subject, call 503-631-3808.
National Prayer Network,
P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR
97015

The famous Lichter-Rothman poll

in the early 1980s found that top
media executives were radically
out of step with the moral values
of the American public.
"There is no such thing, at this
date of the world's history, in
America, as an independent
press. You know it and I
know it. The business of the
Journalist is to destroy truth;
To lie outright; To pervert;
To vilify; To fawn at the feet
of mammon, and to sell his
country and his race for his
daily bread. You know it and
I know it and what folly is
this toasting an independent
press? We are the tools and
vassals for rich men behind the
scenes. We are the jumping
jacks, they pull the strings and
we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and or lives are all
the property of other men. We
are intellectual prostitutes."
(MEDIA WHORES)
-John Swinton, former
Chief of Staff, The New
York Times, 1953
* Except The American's
Bulletin
There ain't no
Free Press!*
6 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
L LE ET T T TH HE E G GO OV VE ER RN NM ME EN NT T P PA AY Y Y YO OU UR R B BI IL LL LS S
Yes, let the "ALL CAPITAL NAME DUMMY" (corporation), (with
"Your" name) pay its-OWN "Bills" (instead of "you"). IRS, Mortgage,
Credit Card, Annual land Tax, Court Judgments, Traffic Tickets, fines,
fees, bail Bonds, Hospital Bills. (Guaranteed to WORK). $250.00
Eliminate Debts (defense Mode) or $20.00 for Basic Data".
www.peoples-rights.com Association, care of 1624 Savannah Rd. TAB,
Lewes, near (19958) Delaware.
T To ol ll l- -F Fr re ee e 1 1- -8 87 77 7- -5 54 44 4- -4 47 71 18 8 ( (2 24 4 h ho ou ur rs s) )
Exchange Ad from Don on 02.04.08:
2.25 x 3.5 = 7.875 Sq. Inches
E
veryone pretty much
believes that our courts are
operating in law and that they
hear criminal matters .this
is simply not true, at least
not since 1938, when Erie
v Thompson was heard and
decided by our Supreme Court.
Most everyone believes that
our employees of the various
government agencies (ABC/
Alphabet agencies) are duly
authorized to do what they
do this is simply not true .
Especially when dealing with
the lawful Inhabitants of the
Union of several states, as
we have never actually autho-
rized them to regulate us,
the people. The lawful
governments commission
was to regulate their own,
and the creatures of the
State. STATE OF OHIO
is NOT the State of Ohio,
and in fact is an instru-
mentality of UNITED
STATES which is the
unincorporated agency of
the United States. There
are no boundaries defined
in their constitution. These
agencies have absolutely NO
criminal jurisdiction.
The IRS Code admits this
in 27 C.F.R. S72.11, where it
is stated and defned that all
so-called crimes are in fact
commercial. All commerce
is deemed International, and
International commerce is
Maritime in nature. Maritime or
International law is EQUITY in
nature, and all Maritime claims
are handled in a court of equity
(NOT Law), in and Admiralty-
Maritime jurisdiction. The
gold-fringed fag (colors) is
our silent judicial notice of
such military tribunal. An
Executive of military tribunal
has no inherent power to
prison anyone, without an
agreement (contract) between
the parties . Except for one
single condition, and that is for
CONTEMPT.
The Supplemental Rules
of Admiralty are contained
in the last volume of the
F.R.C.P. (Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure), found with
Title 28 of the U.S. Code
the Judicial Code. Our
Constitution does provide for
these Admiralty Courts, but
they are totally different from
the Judicial Courts of Law
that everyone expects. If one
doesnt read and understand
these Supplemental Rules
whatsoever of these facts
in the courtroom just the
silent judicial notice f the fag,
so if one doesnt understand
the difference between the
American Flag of Peace (the
Red, White, & Blue), and the
military fag of the President
(as above, but with a yellow
border or fringe), they have
snoozed and they will loose!
No one, except a licensed
attorney, has any standing
whatsoever before a court of
Admiralty, unless thy have
frstly posted bond. The
Supplemental Rules bear this
out. Anyone who speaks
or acts before such a court
without frstly posting their own
bond, is in contempt of court.
There are NO exceptions. This
is Equity NOT law. They
always charge the VESSEL
NOT the man! When a man
answers for charges against
the VESSEL (ALL CAPS NAME
see Title 46 U.S.C.), he is
The Court Mystery Solved!
deemed to be its owner. This is
Equity NOT law. The owner
of the VESSEL is strictly liable
(liable=guilty) for damages
caused by his VESSEL (or other
things/rem/property). This
is Equity. He MUST post his
own bond to cover the alleged
damages, so the Court can
pay the claim and refund the
difference, after their costs,
to the Bond holder. A 10%
bond is ineffective, except to
obtain temporary release when
incarcerated. A man lacks any
standing whatsoever before
a court of Admiralty (equity)
until he posts or redeems the
bond(s) that are offered. He
is in contempt of court unless
and until he post the bond(s)
PERIOD. There are no
exceptions to this rule. What
does any of this have to do
with criminal? Nothing .all
crimes are commercial.
Strict liability means strict
guilt, as an owner of a thing/
property/rem/BESSEL is
deemed liable for the damages
alleged against that property,
and MUST post the bond(s)
before he can even be
heard. Even when someone
pleads even a guilty plea
(guilty=liable), they are in
contempt of court until they
post or redeem the bond(s),
as they have admitted liability
and dishonored the court by
not paying their liability thru
the posting of the bond(s).
There are NO exceptions .this
is Equity. Everyone locked
up in prison in this country is
actually in contempt of court.
but they have not disclosed
this, as to deceive the public
into believing that they are
operating a criminal justice
system, when in fact, they
are NOT. Its just business, as
usual!
Now, this is the way it
actually. This is all pretty
much legal, but as you should
be able to see, there was in
fact some non-disclosure here,
and that is FRAUD! So the
$64 Question is; why are they
motivated to commit this fraud
by non-disclosure of these
facts? m o n e - y Its
the root (cause) of all evil. As
their greed motivates them
to conceal the truth, as they
know how to manipulate HJR-
192 (the Public {Insurance}
Policy), and P.L. 73-10 better
than we do! They understand,
all too well, how our credit
operates, and that the U.S.
owes us just compensation for
all that it took for public use
(1933 and thereafter). They
know that our documents of
title have value, and that those
have been taken for public use
to collateralize their debt.
So, they use our credit to
create these so-called Penal
Bonds, Std. Forms 24, 25,
25A, 28, 273, 274, 275, and
they sell them @ discount on
the public market . A very
lucrative business, as each is
valued at $1,000,000.00 per
felony count ($100,000 for
misdemeanor). They call this
blocked credit, as they use our
credit while we are prevented
from using it, as they hold us
in contempt. These are all tax-
differed funds. We are being
held in what is actually called
a Repository Bank. We are
signed on as the Surety on
these bonds, and literally being
held in bondage. (Mitsrayim)
Now the problem is how to
redeem the bonds when they
run into the multimillions. Well,
whos bonds are they, theirs or
ours? Whos name is on them,
theirs or ours? Did they give
us our just compensation for
what they took from us
for public use? (see the
5th Amendment Bill of
Rights) So, what must
we do? How about fling
a CLAIM for that just
compensation .that
amount which was
withheld and used by
them without beneft to
us the entire value of
the bond(s). The proper
form for doing such on a BOND
or Other evidence of Debt, is
the IRS Form 1099-OID. This
identifes the Payer us, and
the Recipient them, the
amount of Income we claim,
and the amount of withholding
they withheld. They cannot
deny or escape this it is a
matter of public record, but
we must report this, they dont
have to.
So, we claim the full
estimated value as our income,
and that same estimated value
as withholding, and show
our SS# as the account from
which it was taken, marking
the correction box at the
top, to indicate that they may
have already claimed these as
abandoned funds on a 1099-A
(a trick weve learned they do),
then of course, claim the same
on our annual 1040 Return.
Walla! We are due to receive
a refund of the withholding as
our just compensation. NOTE:
This is a way to win at this
weve discovered their fraud
and how they are being unjustly
enriched off of this bondage
scheme, and weve lawfully
fled our claim to recover
our just compensation. This
action redeems the bond(s)
and returns the funds taken
from OUR credit, and that is it.
The recipient is always liable
on a 1099. Theyve always
been using the 1099 against
us (1099-Misc when we sub-
contract, etc.), so turn-about
is fair play. And there are lots
of other eligible issues, as the
IRS calls them that we can
report as withholding and get
refunded our just compensation
on our annual 1040 Returns.
We call this Tax Recovery.
The IRS refers to it as returning
the principle to the source. We
are the source. Have you ever
taken out a so-called loan?
Are you aware of the fact that
banks have NO money to loan
.they are actually prohibited
from lending from their capital
or from other depositors
funds. So, what do they
loan? NOTHING! They merely
exchange your promissory
note for their check. Your
promissory note is actually
deposited for credit into the
same account they draw the
check from, it gives the credit
to the account, that the check
will debit when returned to
that bank. An even exchange
NOT a loan. The bank is then
unjustly enriched off of all the
payments you make both
principle and interest are pure
proft to the bank!
Their unjust enrichment is
removed when you report this
even on a 1099-OID, as they
withheld giving you credit for
your Note. If you dont report
it, they dont have to! There
is so much more weve been
missing.

There are no boundaries

defned in their constitution.
These agencies have absolutely
NO criminal jurisdiction.
If voting could really
change things, it would
be illegal.
If pro is the opposite of Con,
then what is the opposite of
progress? Congress!
A free people ought not
only to be armed and
disciplined, but they should
have suffcient arms and
ammunition to maintain
a status of independence
from any who might
attempt to abuse them,
which would include their
own government."
George Washington
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 7
The Americans Bulletin - P.O. Box 3096 - Central Point, Oregon 97502







The book; Cracking the Code The Fascinating Truth About Taxation
in America has three Parts with 19 Chapters and an Appendix.

Note; This Book has nothing to do with Redemption and should not be
confused with Cracking the Code - 3rd Edition!
Youll learn in Cracking the Code among other
things; that income, wages, self-employment
income, trade or business, etc., - as these and
certain other terms are used within and in regard to
the tax law have narrow meanings exclusively
applying to privileged activities such as holding a
government office or working in one! And youll
learn the process to get Refunds back.
Get YOUR Copy Today!
Item No. NH1 - $36.00
Via Postal Money Order - Priority Mail Shipping Included
Cracking
The Code
Book
Cover Pic
Here Nic
Cracking the Code
The Fascinating Truth About
Taxation in America!
PATRIOT PUBLICATIONS
www.Maine-Patriot.com
By Patsy Trigg
I
n Lynchburg, Tennessee
Patsy Trigg got run over by
the Chancery Court of Moore
County.
Better known as the prettier
half of the duo that brought
us that Christmas Classic,
Grandma Got Run Over By A
Reindeer, Patsy has her own
tale of woe about her on-going
dispute with the local municipal
governments interpretation of
Justice under the color of law.
Just a few weeks back a
neighbor called and asked
Patsy if she knew that her
home and property were listed
in the Moore County News and
that it was going to be sold at
auction October 27, 2008 at
10:00am.
No! Was Patsys reply.
Without further hesitation
Patsy says she began an
intensive investigation into the
Moore County Court records.
She said she soon learned that
J. B. Cox, Chancellor, John T.
Bobo and W. Andrew Bobo
Attorneys for the State of
Tennessee on behalf of Moore
County, City of Lynchburg, and
Ralph McBride Attorney for
? (No notice of appearance on
fle) and Tammy P. Roberts
Clerk & Master met Ex Parte,
(in secret), and created, signed
and fled several documents
that allegedly authorized
the sale of her home under
what Patsy says was the
color of law, under the color
of offce and without notice
and opportunity for Patsy to
respond or defend.
This Notice of Sale was for
a tax lien from Civil Action
No.: 2171. Patsy added
that the case was last heard
over a year ago and the last
paper fled into the case was
a Judicial Notice she fled that
challenged the subject matter
jurisdiction of the court. Patsy
said it should be noted, the
Supreme Court of the United
States in Melo v US 474 Fed
215 8th Cr. states, Once
jurisdiction is challenged, the
court cannot proceed.
According to Patsy, as of this
date Andrew Bobo, Attorney,
has yet to provide the Law with
the legislative authority that
gives this court jurisdiction to
hear and render a judgment in
this case.
The Chancery Court of
Moore County chose to ignore
the Supreme Courts decision
and Judge Cox informed me
that any laws or court cases
other than those decided in
HOOLIGANS AND THE PROPERTY TAX
Tennessee had no authority
in his court. Patsy continued,
This alone was a violation of
my due process as was the
secret meeting and re-opening
of this case when the court
had lost jurisdiction through
inactivity for more than a
year. With the few days
available to take action, Patsy
said on October 10, 2008 she
fled into the case a Judicial
Notice to Cease and Desist the
Sale of her Patented Land and
again challenged this Courts
Subject Matter Jurisdiction to
Order Sale Ex Parte.
October 13, 2008 Patsy fled
a complaint with the Board
of Professional Responsibility
naming John T. Bobo, Andrew
Bobo and Ralph McBride for
misconduct and abuse of legal
process under the color of law
and color of offce. Also on this
same date she fled a similar
Complaint with the Court of
the Judiciary against J. B. Cox,
Chancellor. Both Complaints
claimed that these individuals
had acted with improper
conduct and Patsy was seeking
remedy and sanctions.
The issues claimed in these
two Complaints were that
these persons acted in bad
faith and in disregard of their
offcial duties under their
respective Oaths and did:
(1) Meet Ex Parte, in secret,
and re-opened a case that
had exceeded the Statute of
Limitations absent Notice and
Opportunity to respond and
defend, (2) Create and fle an
Ex Parte Order of Sale in clear
absence of Subject Matter
Jurisdiction and absent Notice
and Opportunity to respond
and defend.
Patsy quotes, The Supreme
Court found in Simon v Craft,
182 U.S. 427, 436, the
essential elements
of due process of
law are notice and
opportunity to
defend. This is
further supported
by Illinois Cent.
R.R. v Brooks,
909 Tenn. 161,
wherein the
court found,
A judgment
rendered without
service of written
notice, waiver
thereof, or
appearance is
void. This was
brought to the
attention of all
parties that J. B.
Coxs Order of
Sale was null and
void and without
force and effect.
This fell on deaf
ears.
On October
17, 2008 Patsy said
she then fled a Peremptory
Writ of Mandamus with the
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
at Nashville in an attempt to
stop the sale.
October 23, 2008, in a
last ditch effort to stop this
unlawful sale Patsy said she
fled a Notice of Removal to the
United States District Court
Eastern District of Tennessee
at Winchester. According to
Patsy this brought smirks and
gales of laughter from several
friends who told her she was
nuts to think that even though
it was a Federal issue that
this federal court located in
the next county would give
a hoot and step in. Patsy
says, I was told that these
government offcials, local,
State and Federal, were are
all in bed together, its like the
fox watching the hen house
with feathers stuck between
his teeth claiming he didnt eat
that chicken. These quislings
have no ethics, no integrity, no
morals and no accountability,
only power under force of
arms, greed and arrogance.
Patsy adds, What a sad
situation that weve allowed
our judicial system to develop
into this quasi legal authority
and that we have allowed
them to get away with this
behavior, to terrorize us in this
manner.
Patsy continues, Sure
enough, they were right. Not
one Judicial Offcial at any
level stepped up and stopped
this kangaroo court sale. The
good old boy system at its
fnest.
Patsy says that James A.
Vick, Deputy Chief Disciplinary
Counsel of the Board of
Professional Responsibility,
chose to ignore the matter
and advised her to seek legal
counsel and J. S. Daniel,
Disciplinary Counsel and Don
R. Ash, Presiding Judge of
the Tennessee Court of the
Judiciary decided that her
complaint did not rise to the
level of judicial misconduct and
should be dismissed. Patsy
adds, So who is monitoring
the monitors?
And yes, at the 11th hour,
9:57am to be exact Patsy said
she paid the alleged tax lien
under coercion, duress and
force of arms, therein making
the payment null and void.
I fgured out what Patsy
stands for, she says with a
smile on her face, positive
attitude toward sycophant
yahoos and in this particular
instance that would be the
local justice system and the
pettifogger shysters groveling
for flthy lucre who have
corrupted it
This issue of property taxes
began back in 1999/2000. Like
most folks Patsy was appalled
at the outrageous increase
in her property taxes. Patsy
said her local tax assessor,
Wayne Harrison, told her
that the property taxes were
State Mandated and affected
everyone and there was
nothing he could do about it.
Affected is the magical word
of the day, Patsy adds.
Not satisfed with this
explanation Patsy began to dig
deeper. I started my research
with the local tax records and
what a jaw dropping nugget I
found. Patsy continues, When
my taxes went from $920 to
$1089, and increase of $169,
for my 57 acres classifed as
Ag, I discovered that Wayne
Harrisons taxes went from
$304 to $231, a decrease of
$73, on his 65 acres classifed
Ag. Yes, Wayne was right,
everyone was affected but
defnitely not equally, fairly or
comparably.
Patsy chose to take this issue
to court. Patsy says, It didnt
take but one session in court
to fnd that the court was not
a court of law and was corrupt
and crooked as a pigs tail.
Patsy says from the get go she
had no rights, Constitutional
or otherwise. In spite of
the fact that the odds were
against her, she was able to
extend her frst civil case, no.:
1960, out for over a year. She
further states that with each
grueling court appearance
the Chancery Court of Moore
County continued to cross
the line of ethical behavior
and misconduct. Patsy adds
that with willful, malicious
and unlawful use of the legal
process and proceedings,
and willful and intentional
misdirection and misleading
she was denied a fair hearing
and due process of law.
Patsy states that on more
than one occasion and in open
court Andrew Bobo, Attorney,
told her that he did not have
to read anything she fled and
that he did not have to respond
to anything that she fled after
telling her directly that she
was tiresome, Patsy says that
Andrew Bobo, Attorney for the
State of Tennessee, fled an
Execution and Garnishment
and stole $1,798.57 from
Patsys federally protected
bank account thus closing case
no.: 1960. Patsy says this
Execution and Garnishment
was done absent a hearing,
absent a judgment, absent
an order, absent a judges
signature and absent Notice
and Opportunity to defend.
Patsy states, If I had
pulled this stunt I would be in
prison. Stealing money from
a federally protected bank
account is a federal offense
and is punishable by a heavy
fne and imprisonment.
Patsy continues, I took
this matter to everyone I
could think of, even Governor
Bredeson and asked someone
to look into this matter and that
at the least Mr. Bobo should be
disbarred and sanctioned and
my funds returned.
Nothing! Patsy says, I
did get a letter from Governor
Bredeson who basically said
he was sorry to hear about this
situation, there was nothing
his offce could do, but please
feel free to call on him any
time in the future.
Pathetic!
I refuse to take no for an
answer. If something is wrong,
it is wrong.
In an effort to make a
difference Patsy says that she
has attended legal workshops,
classes and seminars in
California, Michigan, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana,
Tennessee and numerous
places in between. There is
an incredible network of folks
all working together to provide
useful legal information to help
bring our legal system back on
track.
She adds, One of the
frst articles I downloaded
that inspired me to pursue
this path was an article by
Howard Freeman called The
UCC Connection. I believe
Mr. Freeman was in his 80s
when he wrote this paper and
I am sure it is still out there
and available. Defnitely a
good place to start if you are
curious.
Early on I had the good
fortune of attending a
workshop that dealt with Land
Patents. On June 8, 2001 I
fled a Declaration of Land
Patent and am now the Land
Patent Assign and owner of fee
simple title. Patsy continues,
Article IV Section III, Clause
II of the Constitution of these
United States is very clear
about the authority and power
See HOLLIGANS
Continued on Page 9
8 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
Montana Unveils
Driver's License
As all Montanans know, Governor, Brian Schweitzer
ran his reelection campaign on saying to the National
ID Card. HE LIED ABOUT THE WHOLE THING!!!
From John Smith
HELENA (AP) - Montana's
driver's license is getting a big
makeover aimed at making it
one of the most secure driver's
licenses.
State offcials unveiled the
license Tuesday - touting the
l i cense' s
mul t i pl e
c o l o r s ,
duplicate
p h o t o s ,
t ext ured
s ur f ac e,
h i d d e n
i m a g e s
and an
e a s i l y
n o t i c e d
change to identify those too
young to buy alcohol.
The license will start replacing
the old license this month, said
Dean Roberts, administrator of
the Motor Vehicle Division. The
new card will be handed out
when people renew a current
license or get one for the frst
time.
Roberts said Montana
followed recommendations
from a national umbrella group
of license administrators,
which in turn became many of
the standards adopted by the
U.S. Department of Homeland
Security as part of its Real ID
push.
Roberts said Montana's early
move to secure its license with
new identity theft features
allowed Montana to tell
Homeland Security earlier this
year that the state's license
was already moving toward
enhanced features.
"Real ID just adopted the
standards that the states
had set for themselves with
the national umbrella group,"
Roberts said. "We will be the
frst state to have this much
security in a card."
The license features a new
surface of microscopic glass
beads that cannot be peeled
away without destroying the
images and information on
the license, making it nearly
impossible for people to alter
a license, Roberts said.
It has dozens of other
featuring, including a digital
strip on the back that holds
the card
i nf or mat i on.
Police offcers
will have
readers in their
cars to scan
the license,
Roberts said.
It also has a
hidden pick
and shovel that
only shows up
under ultraviolet light, and
another image that only shows
up when the license is backlit.
License for those under 21
years old are oriented vertically,
rather than horizontally, to
make them easier to identify.
Information, such as date of
birth, shows up in multiple
places on the license and the
license features a duplicate,
smaller, photo in the lower
corner.
"It's not your typical plastic
card," Roberts said.
The Following article can be
found in the Billings Gazette
June 11, 2008 page 3 of the
local section.

Editor Comment; Well,

politicians lie when their mouth
is moving! But Montanans will
have a new fangled indicia
(license) of their agreement to be
bound to the Motor Vehicle Code
to be taxed and raise so-called
money for the State of Montana
Corporation, so that they can feel
more secure living and working
within the police state under the
Patriot Acts in violation of their
unalienable rights.
Jurors Seek Truth and
Justice, Judges Confounded
by 12 googled men and true
By John Ozimek

A
fter years of complaints
that judges may not
always be in touch with the
modern world, one judge hit
back last week by suggesting
that younger jury members
may be too conditioned by
technology
to give defendants a fair trial.
Worse, they are so used
to doing their own research
online, that they have affected
several major trials. The
problem, according to Chief
Justice, Judge of Draycote is
that most young people get
their information from the
internet.
Whilst listening may be an
issue in some trials, in others it
is the tendency of jurors to go
back to do their own research,
often aided by the internet.
In his speech, the Chief
Justice also referred to a
conviction for rape that had to
be quashed when it became
clear that a juror had gone
researching online using a
Blackberry.
In January of this year, Judge
David Paget QC reluctantly
discharged a jury, thereby
cutting short the trial for child
cruelty of a children's nanny,
after he became aware that
one juror had been picking
up misinformation on the
internet.
An even more spectacular
debacle occurred in August,
when Judge David Hodson
abandoned a manslaughter
trial at Newcastle Crown
Court, after a middle-aged
juror turned sleuth and carried
out his own investigations.
These involved visiting the
site of the alleged crime, taking
photos, taking measurements
of a fence critical to the case
and researching his own
theories on the internet, before
persuading the jury to hand a
list of 37 "key questions" to
the judge.
This Proves there are men
and women who do Seek Truth
and Justice! There is Hope.

Editor comment: hopefully,

more people going in for
jury duty with or without a
blackberry will take the time to
search out the right of the jury
to judge both the facts and the
law as that is the right of the
jury consisting of 12 good men
or women in their sovereign
capacity. The judge is a
mere public servant, but his
allegiance is not to truth and
justice if tells the jurors you
are to judge the facts and I
WILL GIVE YOU THE LAW and if
you fnd the facts are true YOU
MUST FIND THE DEFENDANT
GUILTY! But regardless of the
revenue raising scheme of the
private commercial courts,
what of the Law? What if is
misapplied, unjust or down-
right wrong? Its the jurors
right to investigate all matters
and if necessary, throw the
law out!
Judge Says
Tech-Addled
Jurors
Undermine
Justice
By Dave Eberhart
T
he federal government
has already deployed new
detection machines that can
scan citizens without their
knowledge from as far as 50
feet away and "read" their
personal documents such as
passports or driver's licenses.
The Homeland Security
Department touts the high-
tech devices as increasing
security at border crossings,
but privacy advocates are
raising all sorts of red fags.
Critics say the new machines,
which read one's personal
information right through a
wallet or purse, do so without
consent or a warrant and may
set a worrisome precedent.
The devices, called Radio
Frequency Identifcation (RFID)
machines, allow offcials to read
remotely any passports, pass
cards, and driver's licenses
that contain special chips with
personal information.
The RFIDs are so sensitive
that, even before a vehicle
pulls up at a border
checkpoint, agents already
will have on their computer
screen the personal data of
the passengers, including each
person's name, date of birth,
nationality, passport or ID
number, and even a digitized
photo.
The new gadgets are in place,
or soon will be, at fve border
crossings: Blaine, Wash.;
Buffalo; Detroit; Nogales, Ariz.;
and San Ysidro, Calif. They are
slated to have a dramatically
expanded presence in June.
Lee Tien of the Electronic
Frontier Foundation argues
that the technology could
make Americans less secure
because terrorists or other
criminals may be able to steal
the personal information off
the ID cards remotely.
New ID Scanners at Borders
Raise Privacy Alarm

VITAL LINK FOR ALL HOMEOWNERS

www.StopEveryForeclosure.org
Tien and other critics warn
that people up to no good can
use their own RFID machines
in a process called "skimming"
to read the information from
as far as 50 feet.
Indeed, consumer privacy
expert Katherine Albrecht
maintains that the chips create
the "potential for a whole
surveillance network to be set
up." Among other abuses, she
says police could use them
to track criminals; abusive
husbands could use the
technology to fnd their wives;
and stores could trail the
shopping patterns of patrons.
Homeland Security, however,
rebuts the criticism, arguing
that the embedded chips
surrender only a code to
machine readers. That code is
then broken in order to display
the personal information on
the border agents' screen.
Meanwhile, the same
agencies that are issuing
the newfangled IDs supply a
sleeve that keep out all prying
electronic eyes when not in
use.

Editor comment; Well the

New World Order is advancing.
Remember the frog in cold water
and then the heat is turned
up ever so slowly. Question;
who gave these offcers of de-
facto the corporation U.S., Inc.
the right to number you, chip
you, license you, track you,
scan you, etc., etc. Are you
consenting by your silence?
Are you assisting in your own
demise? And what are you
doing to your children and
grandchildren? Are we not
our brothers keeper and of
our collective freedom and
what then of our guarantee of
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit
of happiness? So many
questions so little time!
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 9
HOLLIGANS
Continued From Page 7
of Congress with regard to
the disposition and rules and
regulations respecting territory
and property belonging to the
United States. The vehicle
known as the land patent was
to forever divest the federal
government of its land and was
to place such total ownership
in the hands of the sovereign
freeholders. The Statutes
enacted pursuant to Article IV
had the main goal of creating in
the sovereigns, freeholders on
their lands, beholden to no lord
or superior. The 16th Congress
of 1820 met and created a law
by way of a Statute at Large,
among others, 3 Stat. 566,
16 Congress, Sess. 1, Ch. 51
that was the major land patent
statute enacted to dispose of
lands.
Patsy further provided that
the United States Supreme
Court found, a patent to land
is the highest evidence of title
and may not be collaterally
attached. State v Crawford,
441 P 2d 586 (1968), .. is
not subject to taxation by the
State, nor can state statutes
enacted subsequent to the
transfer have any operation
therein. Surplus Trading
Company v Cook, 281 US
647 and The land patent is
the highest evidence of title
and is immune from collateral
attack. Raestle v. Whitson,
582 P 2d 170, 172 (1978).
The down side to this is
that in order to be heard by
a court that recognizes the
Constitution as the Supreme
Law of the land you have to
pay the graft fees to a string
of corrupted inferior courts
to get there. The sad part
of this is, even though many
have won and many continue
to pursue a win before a
legitimate court of law, instead
of acknowledging this right of
fee simple ownership at the
beginning, each new case has
to travel that road alone from
scratch.
Patsy continues, Man has and
is always striving to protect his
rights, the most dear being the
absolute right to ownership of
the land. Remember the land
patent, the public policy of the
Congress, and the legislative
intent behind the Statutes at
Large, guaranteed this right.
Such rights must be reacquired
through the re-declaration of
the patent in the color of title
claimants name, based on his
color to title and possession.
With such rights the land is
protected from forced sale,
foreclosure and excessive
taxation. These rights must
be recaptured from the state
legislated laws or the freedoms
guaranteed in the Bill of Rights
and Constitution will be lost
and will become exceedingly
harder to reclaim.
It is my goal to see this to
the end and to pave a way for
others who wish to reclaim their
absolute right to ownership
of the land. If we are not
mindful, Thomas Jeffersons
statement, the children of
this generation may someday
wake up homeless on the land
their forefathers founded.
may well come true.
With a twinkle in her eye
Patsy adds, As Mad Eye Moody
would say, Vigilance, Constant
Vigilance!
The following are a few
starter notes that Patsy has
put together to assist you if
you choose to go to court to
protect yourself, your family or
your private
property:
Get a
copy of the
Constitution
of the United
States of
America, the
Constitution
for your
State and a
Blacks Law
di cti onary.
These are also available at
your local library.
Find the Bill of Rights in
both Constitutions and read
them till you are familiar
with your rights. *NOTE: At
all times you verbally and in
writing reserve your God-given
unalienable birthrights waiving
none ever.
When you go to court
never take less than three (3)
people with you to observe
and take notes. The more
witnesses you have in your
corner the better your chances
of a fair hearing. NOTE: Never
call your friends witnesses or
they will have them removed
from the court. Your friends
are there for moral support
and to observe.
You can be forceful but
always be courteous no matter
how rude and offensive they
get.
Always try to put
everything in a question and
if you dont understand keep
asking them to explain till you
understand. Remember Bill
Clinton saying, Depends on
what your defnition of is is.
Look is up in a dictionary.
Never agree to anything,
even to disagree. Once you
agree to anything you have
given implied consent and
have placed yourself in their
personam jurisdiction.
Always, Always, Always
challenge subject matter
jurisdiction! At the state level
always ask for the law with
the enacting clause on the
face of the law/statute/code/
ordinance/bill etc. that they
are ordering you to obey. If
at the federal level ask for
the implementing regulation.
You are entitled to and you
must require that they provide
the law with the legislative
authority that makes said law,
etc. binding and therein giving
the court jurisdiction.
Note: Revised Statutes,
bills, codes, ordinances, etc.
are all considered color of law
unless they have legislative
authority on the face of each
respective form of law that
makes it legally binding. Look
up color of law and color of
offce in Blacks Law. Cases in
support of this statement, In
our judgment, an imperative
mandate of the people, in
their sovereign capacity, to
the legislature, requiring that
all laws, to be binding upon
them shall, upon their face,
express the authority by which
they were enacted. State
of Nevada
v Rogers,
10 Nev.
120, 261;
cited with
approval in
: People v
Dettenhaler,
77 N.W. 450,
452, 118
Mich. 595;
Kefauver v
Purling, 290
S.W. 14, 15 154 Tenn. 613.
Very important to consider,
once you retain an attorney you
are considered incompetent
and become a ward of the
state and you waive all your
rights. Research this! NOTE
CASES: First duty not to
client, Counsel must remember
that they too, are offcers of
the court, administrators of
justice, oath-bound servants
of society; that their frst
duty is not to their clients, as
many suppose, but is to the
administration of justice; that
their clients success is wholly
subordinate; US v Frank, 53
F2d 128, 129, US v Loughlin,
57 F2d 1080, Pearse v US, 59
F2d 518; re Kelly, 243 F. 696,
705
One of the courts favorite
forms of intimidation is to
accuse you of practicing law
without a license. The United
States Supreme Court found,
The practice of law CAN NOT
be licensed by any state/State
Schware v Board of Examiners,
353 US 238, 239 (emphasis
added) and The practice of law
is an occupation of common
right. Sims v Aherns, 271
S.W. 720.
As it stands now and to the
best of my Understanding,
there are only two types of
taxes, Direct and Indirect.
The property tax is an indirect
tax and is voluntary. Ask! The
statutes, codes, ordinances,
etc. that pertain to property
taxes are all color of law and
are not binding and are without
force and effect.
Patsy continues, The only
way they can enforce property
taxes is through intimidation,
coercion and duress under
force of arms, color of law
and color of offce. I believe
it is up to each one of us to
stand up and challenge these
laws of color. We can make
a difference and bring the
law and the courts back to
where they belong, under the
authority of we the people.
Note: The following cases
are important to have on hand.
Be sure and look them up and
make a copy for reference.
There is no risk of
criminal prosecution where
one in good faith challenges
an agency. Casey v FTSCA,
Wash. 578 j2d 793 (1978);
Actual or threatened exercise of
power over another is coercion
and duress which will render
the payment involuntary.
Cleveland v Smith 132 US
318; and The Supreme Court
decision Hafer v Melo, 90 681
US (1991) held that under
title 42 United States Code,
Sec. 1983 suits, every person
who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any
state subjects, or causes to
be subjected, any citizen of
the United states or other
person within the jurisdiction
thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the
constitution and laws, shall be
liable to the party injured.
Patsy adds, Does it make
sense to sell someones home
for a few hundred dollars or a
couple of thousand dollars to
pay a tax that is voluntary?
What about the equity in the
property? What about just
compensation? Where does
this money go? What bank is
it deposited in? Whose name
is the account in? Why do we
accept this?
Patsy goes on to say, If I do
this right maybe just maybe
homeowners across the
country will fnd the courage
to come together singly or in
groups and take the initiative to
research, question the rules,
codes, statutes, etc. and put
their public offcials feet to the
fre and make sure that they
stay within the scope of their
authority and the Law.
When not taking on the
judicial system Patsy fnds a
creative release in designing
toys and games and has
written her frst book, Letters
From Grandma to Patsy.
Patsy says shes been
working with Dan Dee Toys
and they have released a
Singing Poinsettia Plant
named Percy. Percy will be
performing the song, Percy
the Puny Poinsettia, the B side
to single release of Grandma
Got Run Over By A Reindeer.
Percy is available in Rite Aide
Pharmacies and Drug Stores
this Christmas 2008.
If you are interested in
learning more about Patsy,
Grandma, Percy and who
knows what all, check out
her newly designed Website,
elmoandpatsy.com, the offcial
web site for Grandma Got Run
Over By A Reindeer by Patsy.
Patsy and Grandma wish to
leave you with one last thought
for the Christmas Holidays,
If you hear sleigh bells.
DUCK!

Does it make sense to

sell someones home for
a few hundred dollars
or a couple of thousand
dollars to pay a tax that is
voluntary?
OIL
Continued From Page 1
OBAMA
Continued From Page 1
Bush, Reid added, "We will
soon finally have a leader and
partner in the White House
who recognizes the urgency
with which we must turn
around our economy, and I
look forward to working with
him and the new Congress to
do so."
The Labor Department
reported that claims for
unemployment benefits
jumped last week to the
highest level since July 1992,
providing fresh evidence of
the weakening job market.
"We'll put people back
to work rebuilding our
crumbling roads and bridges,
modernizing schools that
are failing our children, and
building wind farms and solar
panels," Obama said. He also
made a commitment to fuel-
efficient cars and alternative
energy technologies "that can
free us from our dependence
on foreign oil and keep our
economy competitive in the
years ahead."
Obama pointed to the past,
saying that Americans in this
country's darkest hours have
risen above their divisions
to solve their problems, as a
hope for the future.
"We have acted boldly,
bravely, and above all,
together," Obama said. "That is
the chance our new beginning
now offers us, and that is the
challenge we must rise to in
the days to come. It is time to
act. As the next president of
the United States, I will."

James Bartis, lead researcher

with the study says we've got
more oil in this very compact
area than the entire Middle
East - more than 2 TRILLION
barrels. Untapped! That's more
than all the proven oil reserves
of crude oil in the world today,
reports The Denver Post.
Don't think 'OPEC' will drop
its price - even with this find?
Think again! It's all about the
competitive marketplace, it
has to.
Now that weve got your
attention... and hopefully
P.O'd, (especially at your gov-
ernment Representatives that
youve voted for), maybe its
time to write or email them
and make DEMANDS! That
they get off their thumbs and
do whats necessary to get
the oil out of the ground, pro-
cessed and distributed to the
gas stations! And at $16.00
dollars a barrel, maybe the
gas price at the pump might
be $1.50 a gallon!!!
Now, while you're thinking
about this: forward this article
to all your thinking friends,
neighbours, at work. Hell,
POST it everywhere. Mail it
to your Reps and Congress-
people!
If you don't take a little
time to do this, then you
shouldnt complain about gas
prices ...while your elected
public servants are getting
rich sitting on their asses while
screwing the masses!
Now get off yours and DO
SOMETHING. COMPLAIN and
DEMAND!
GOOGLE it or follow this link.
http://www.usgs.gov/news-
room/article.asp?ID=1911
It will blow your mind!

Editor comment; Just after

World War Two, if my recollection of history is correct, the
unemployed were numerous as today. The federal government
decided to hire these people, better than to leave them on the
streets starving to death. The program was to hire them into
govt jobs and the government identified the jobs as welfare.
So see, history does repeat itself! More people gonna be on
welfare with even less people to pay for it! Ops taxes are going
up again; its what Obama calls CHANGE!
10 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
POST CONVICTION REMEDIES
By Aaron Coats, $165.00 includes shipping & handling
Over 1000 pages of Redemption remedies.
One Man Out , By Aaron Coats
$80.00 shipping & handling included . Order from:
Omega -17, LLC
Non-assumpsit/TDC Call; 253-884-5785
c/o P.O. Box 536
Vaughn [ 98394 ]
Washington essentialer@hotmail.com
Corporate Government vs. Government
North American Economy

L
ast month Henry Paulson
voiced his grave concerns
over Iraqs economy on CNN
that if fuel prices dropped
here in North America it would
deeply affect Iraqs economy
fuel from Iraq that Americans
are paying 400/500 percent
more for at the pumps; what
Paulson didnt say was that
Americans are keeping Iraqs
economy strong by paying
four/five dollars at the pump;
Paulsons bold stupidity of
pleading on national television
with struggling Americans to
be content paying high fuel
prices for Iraqs fuel to keep
Iraqs economy strong! Not
surprising Paulsons role in
corporate government has
proved persistent with his
actions as that of a moron
making such a foolish plea to
struggling Americans showed
where his loyalties are, as
we hear and watch on the
same channels Americans los-
ing their homes, jobs and our
way of life deteriorates as our
economy plummets deeper
into poverty. Sharon Lee;
Shields-- eagleinflight

Open letter mailed to
Barack and Michelle
Obama
This open letter will be
published in my Jan/Feb
2009 TAB article, along with
additional updated information.
Your presidential win was a
great victory and hope for North
Americans and our country.
In the week of the election,
I hadnt watched as much
television in over thirty years.
When your win was certain, I
walked outdoors in the night
and could feel the shift in
energy; a shift that affrmed
that our collective faith and
prayers had been answered,
with hope restored for America
of positive change.
In the next few weeks
before inauguration you
must remember what got
you elected: the collective
change in consciousness
that will demand a change in
government; a government that
represents the American people
(not corporate government and
private interests groups).
Mutts like me will be the
frst to tell you the shift in
consciousness was brought
about because of endless
work, research and devotion to
the restoration of sovereignty
to our country and love for
all our people by writers and
researchers like me, the ones
who will expect and demand
nothing less from you than
what was preserved to us by
our forefathers. We expect
nothing less than our freedom,
life, liberty and pursuit of
happiness restored!
The bought and paid for
Medias have gotten away with
negatively labeling millions
of other likeminded men and
women such as myself whove
devoted their lives to the
restoration of our County with a
government for the people and
by the people, along with our
Bill of Rights and Declaration of
Independence.
Some Americans are still
unable to discern truth from
government lies and are in
effect still asleep from the past
two hundred years (Rip Van
Winkle effect) of dependence
upon corporate government
which has really meant that
Americans are lacking the ability
to make rational choices and
decisions about what theyre
really seeing and experiencing
in government.
Such as those who supported
the old politics and politicos
such as McCain and Palin, all
are old school. However, theres
hope because old politics and
politicos are the old states of
being and old mind sets that
are quickly dissipating as it
becomes clearer and clearer
that government has nothing to
do with supporting the welfare
of and enriching our country
and people, evidenced by the
overwhelming support of You
as our next President.
What prompted me to write
and update you with my latest
Americans Bulletin (TAB)
articles was your response
to the dancer disgracefully
displayed on national television
proclaiming her love for you.
Thank you for your moral and
respectable statement to the
Medias and reply to Americans
over the Medias and dancers
outright disrespect, exploitation
and dishonour of you, your
family and Americans. Truly,
it is a time in history that you
will be held to those moral
standards. Contrast to the
immoral and personal insult
weve been saddled with
called government, which is an
absolute disgrace. [Emphasis
Added]
Thank Bill Clinton who is
accredited for the renaming
of the White House to the
Whore House, in light of his
whoring around and immoral
conduct while pretending to
represent North America; and
not to forget Bushs outright
contemptuous blunders
(treason) as he continues to
pretend to represent a lawful
government.
Clinton wouldve been on the
frst plane to meet the dancer
and reap his love rewards at
any cost to his reputation or
moral obligations to America
and Americans. Clinton was/
is such a disgrace as a leader
and man, along with Hillary
and Bush, each representative
of old politics and politicos.
But, old politicos and politics
are no longer acceptable
as government leadership,
including Hillary Clinton,
Sarah Palin, John McCain, all
who are currently involved in
theft, prostitution and criminal
activity, that includes Senator
Ted Stevens who is running for
offce, again! Their boldness
and blatant disregard and
harm of North America and
Americans never cease to
surprise me. Republican values
are that of beholding to the
corporations, and disregard for
the legislation that binds and
governs them; mirrors of the
current state of the past three,
even four, administrations
called government.
The state of leadership
was evident in the Republican
Party campaign when its
integrity, possibilities and hope
of carrying the torch for their
party win was on McCain and
Palin! That reality says a lot, in
itself.
Sarah Palin (See TAB) is
a crook. One example of her
skills as leadership was barely
touched on in mainstream
Medias that she cost the City
of Wasilla millions of dollars
in court costs when she stole
property from a wealthy man
who had the funds to fght
back.
Palin and hubby were busted
for growing marijuana in
years past. Suppressing that
must have been part of the
Republican Partys damage
control. Media editing of old
politics and politicos condone
crooks and thieves running this
country.
It must be said that there are
men and women incarcerated
in Federal and State Prisons
condemned to prison terms up
to life for crimes less than what
many of the current corporate
government leadership has
been found guilty of.
The truth and bottom lines
are that each one named as
politico is a known crook and
guilty of treason, as it relates
to government for the people
and by the people! Of course,
as an avid reader of TAB you
know that government is
a corporate government, an
overlay of our true government
and has absolutely nothing to
do with rights or protections
of Americans. Each one is
representing the de facto (void
of fact) corporation known
to us as Government and
if what we have experienced
for over two hundred years
is what we get, its time to
move on because the current
administration is representative
of fraud, corruption, conspiracy,
prostitution, conspiracy and
treason! Honestly, many
Americans threw in the towel
on the Republicans when
McCain and Palin were the best
the Republicans had to offer.
(My last two TAB articles spoke
to this quandary.)
George Bush annoys me to
even write about him. Hes an
absolute disgrace and should
be tried for treason. Im glad
the Iraq man threw his shoe
at him and it was on Internet
news! Good for him for having
the guts to give Bush exactly
what he deserves: disrespect
and dishonour for being a
trader to both sides! Even as a
representative of the corporate
government hes a worthless
piece of existence. Bush cant
even look a camera straight
on, with one dirty and secret
deal after another hes cost
government (not the people)
billions of dollars a day! Frankly,
the most deserving thing that
I heard about George Bush
was that California had on its
Ballot to name a new sewage
treatment plant after him. It
was voted down; but I think
that was the best thing that I
heard since his name was frst
uttered!
Right now in history its
shoved down Americans
throat the legacy that Clinton
and Bush both have left us
with: Clinton a whore hound,
chasing women as example of
our leadership, and murdering
innocent women and children
by blowing up a plant full of
women and children, causing
the events that led up to the
Twin Tower disaster; NAFTA,
gutted the car industry, turning
Detroit, Michigan into a poverty
stricken town when the auto
industry was moved to China
and all over the world, turning
Americas auto industry into
assembly plants, only; moving
the manufacturing abroad;
shutting down oil manufacturing
plants in America, and then
shipping our own crude oil out
of America to be processed
by other nations, bringing it
back and charging Americans
400/500 percent for our own
crude!
So, you want Hillary Clinton
for Secretary of State, or any
position? You will regret that.
Id begin by questioning what
really happened John Kennedy,
Jr. The CIA can tell you because
they know. Hint: Who was
going to run for Senator against
Hillary Clinton, and wouldve
won hands down! Also, that
same young man was going
to run for President after his
Senatorship and wouldve won
hands down without a dime in
his pocket. Do the research.
Most of us on top of the corrupt
corporate government already
know; perhaps you do, too. In
the twentieth century more men
and women were murdered
in the name of politics than
in all of the historic wars put
together!
Paulson is a foreign policy
man, and looks out for the best
interest of foreigners; and,
is an insult to the integrity of
Americans when his focus is
talking about everything that
has to do with bailing out other
countries and nothing to do
with bailing out America and
getting Americans back on
their feet.
Many just waking up from
their two-hundred years
plus nap of bad politics (not
government) dont need the
capacity to read between the
lines or the white on the paper
to understand where Paulsons
loyalties are; his words say it
all. First of all: Government
did not take over the peoples
banks or money, each are
private corporations belonging
to other private corporations
subsidiaries of the Federal
Government Corporation,
including the Federal Reserve
System and Federal Reserve
Banks. The American people
didnt bail out, anyone.
Government did some fancy
accounting and fast talking and
bailed itself out, using America
and Americans as collateral.
You feel warm and fuzzy
about Wa Mu (Washington
Mutual Bank) being bailed out
by Chase Bank? Again, its
just another banking system
taken over by China, without
a shot fred. The corporate
government guys and gals are
in over their heads in debt to
other countries, such as China;
and, thats what the alleged
wars are all about: debt
and money! What corporation
(government) owes to the
other foreign corporation.
If corporate government
plans on giving the auto
industry billions/trillions of
dollars to allegedly bail them
out, its only a joke. Its nothing
more than a fx for one of
their own. The solution is to
give the money to Americans
and American industry, here
at home, in America. Then
bring all industry back home,
including the manufacturing
of everything. Im no longer
going to support foreign auto
industry as is the primary
industry in and for Americans,
right now.
When NAFTA gutted our
country of industry and free
trade, government (current
administration) put us all
back on Plantation America.
(Where all cultures shipped
here were in the frst place
unless they came here as the
Royalty of those slave nations)
How do you give Americans
money?
Simple: contact Frank
Murkowski and Sarah Palin
who were both involved in
giving Russian immigrants
ffty thousand dollar checks
to start new businesses, gave
them new vehicles and had
brand new homes built for
them! Have them lay out the
free plan for American auto
workers, and all who are out of
work because of NAFTA!
I will throw in the crooked
plans the fact that each Russian
immigrant who brought senior
parents with them, each
was eligible to draw full social
security, folks!
Continuing on with the fx-
it plan: make the Clintons
and Bushes accountable for
their political blunders and
international decisions that
destroyed our economy and
country for their own personal
gains. The majority of
Americans already know what
I say to be fact and truth
because that is why you are
President Elect Barack Obama!
If paybacks and restitutions
are required for the last two/
three administrations, make the
Clintons and Bushes accountable
for their administrations and
the underhanded deals that
they made that re-America
and Americans. It would be fair
to make payroll deductions,
garnishments, freeze their
accounts, freeze their
investments and confscate
their properties and put them
in prison. The basic things
that are done by corporate
government against millions
Americans where some are
serving prison time for doing!
Know that most whove
elected you feel that the
Clintons and Bushes should
stand accountable for their
self-serving private deals,
treason and murders right here
at home and abroad, especially
the deals that are called wars
waged against our country and
people by turning the military
against Americans.
Chinas industry is crashing?
Iraqs economy will be hurt if
Americans quit paying four or
fve dollars a gallon for Iraq fuel?
Well. Corporate government
heres your wakeup call:
Americas industry is crashing
because our auto industry and
fuel manufacturing was moved
out North America by you!
I will continue to pray for
you. Im happy and feel good
and honoured when saying
President Barack Obama and
First Lady Michelle. I feel more
hopeful now than at any time
in my history. I dont envy the
devastation and despair that
the last three administrations
have left you with; but
Americans will support you
and help you in rebuilding a de
jure sovereign government!

Eagleinfight
- Sharon Lee; Shields,
American national
Michiganian,
Send all comments and
correspondence regarding this
article to:
eagleinfight
POB 3472
Central Point, Oregon
[ 97502 ]

THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 11

Discharge of Debt
See DEBT
Continued on Page 16
by A. Pat Riott
I
would like to share the suc-
cess I have been having
with the discharge of debt.
Call me crazy, but I think
that when one has a victory
one should share it with the
rest of us patriots. We are all
so busy chasing that dollar to
pay back the debt that they
fooled us into believing was
ours that there is absolutely
no quality time left over to live
life the way God intended us
to Free! We have become
slaves to the financial task-
masters, duped into thinking
that they are the creditors
and we are the debtors! And
you know what? They are
absolutely correct, because as
long as we act like debtors
we will be treated as such!
My people shall perish from
lack of knowledge, sayeth the
Lord. And I will go one further,
And the will to carry that out
sayeth A. Pat Riott. Do we
really want to add to the list of
bondagefear, worry, doubt,
etc.?
Trust me when I say, I was
one of those who was afraid
that this just might not work.
I worried about getting into
more trouble than I was
already in fnancially. I was
full of doubt; having heard
nothing from the ones who
may have been successful
in clearing up the mess the
so-called creditors had them
in. All of which had a serious
affect on my will to carry it
out, but I knew something had
to change. So I took the rest
of the credit I had left on my
last card and bought all the
necessary books and materials
I needed to (ironically) learn
how to discharge the debt.
Having no understanding of
banking, credit, GAAP, FAS,
and quite frankly terrible in
math, I began to read and
study daily. The frst thing I
did was to become a Secured
Party Creditor so that I would
have the standing and capacity
to discharge debt and be the
holder-in-due course of the
accounts, perform a Bankers
acceptance etc.
Then came the big day when
it was time to put it all to the
test. The bills were due and
the creditors were warming
up their headsets. I fgured
I would attempt to fry the
small fsh frst so I popped
in the CAFV disk (Conditional
Acceptance For Value) that
I had purchased from the
Americans Bulletin and found
a sample that was similar
to what I was doing, but it
wasnt exactly what I needed
and I was stuck! Now one
thing Robert Kelly continually
says, is: understand what it
is youre doing, read it and
conform it to your particular
situation, dont just use the
samples as a boiler-plate. So
I had to wrap my mind around
the material and really think
about what it was that I was
trying to do.
And as I was doing this I
came to the realization that
although it was starting to
make sense there was still a
crucial piece missing That
piece was the understanding of
who I am in all this! I was still
thinking as a debtor, having
lived my entire life as one,
and this stuff was contrary to
everything I had been taught.
It was a very uncomfortable
place to be. Talk about
cognitive dissonance!
So instead of fnding a cozier
bucket of sand to stick my
head into, I spent some time
refecting on who I am and
who my God intended me to
be, and my paradigm began
to shift. So after throwing
my Strawman out of the chair
I sat down and crafted my
very frst CAFV. I felt pretty
confdent that they would go
silent not only because they
are instructed not to answer
but also because the CAFV
was fashioned in such a way
that they would be admitting
to fraud if they did which
means that I now had the new
agreement as it would operate
in my favor and since time
is always against us, I went
ahead and typed up the Notice
of Fault And Opportunity to
Cure, the Affdavit of Fault,
and the Affdavit of Certifcate
of Non-Response with all
the certifed mail cards and
envelopes ready to rock and
roll on the dates marked on
my calendar. Now, this didnt
stop the phone calls.
In fact, I was receiving about
9 or so a day all the way up to
the fnal mailing, then they told
me they were going to report
this to the Credit Bureau. I
told them that would be fne
with me because not only
did I have them in a default
judgment but should they
decide to report it to any one
or all of the fve major credit
reporting agencies they would
only succeed in making me rich
beyond my wildest dreams.
Of course, Im sure the lady
wanted to know just how
exactly that was The next day
they received my Copyright
Notice that described the $1.5
million dollar infringement fee
per violation and the phone
calls stopped (the phone
conversation describing this in
more detail is below). Shortly
thereafter I received in the
mail a short letter stating that
they believe there may have
been fraudulent activity on my
account and they needed my
help to clear this up. There
was an Affdavit typed up with
my name stating that I had
never received the card, never
used any of the credit etc.,
and all I had to do was sign it
and return it with in a certain
time frame and this matter
would be resolved. How about
that! They just wanted it to go
away!
So all I had to do was sign
and I win right? Wrong! Sure,
maybe they did just want the
insurance to cover it, get paid
and move on. But then again,
why would I move to dishonor
and lie about spending the
credit. A debtor may try to
get away with it but a creditor
doesnt have to, it was my
credit! So I called and told
them No deal, I melted that
card for all it was worth, and all
they had to do was handle the
discharge correctly and they
wouldnt lose either. This was
in March of 2008 and my bill
showed the amount due plus
the over the limit amount and
late fees. In April I was sent
another bill, except the billing
cycle was still showing March
only now there was $0.00
due, $0.00 past due and the
balance was going backwards
as if someone was paying it,
only it aint me. The next bill
was also stuck in March. And
are ya ready for this? They
just sent me a new offer for
a higher limit and a lower rate
and when I last checked my
credit report this company is
nowhere on it.
Now, in order to get these
guys to play ball you need to
be able to explain to them the
rules of the game. Some of
them know and they just want
to see if you too know the
entire process or did you just
fnd a little something on the
Internet that will hopefully get
you out of this mess. Others
really dont know and its up
to you to educate them but
this can become a full time job
in itself, plenty good practice
to be sure. Let me give you
an example of how I did just
that when First Equity called
wanting me to pay back my
own money
[Me] Hello?
[FE] Yes, may I please speak
with -------?
[Me] Youre speaking to him,
would this be First Equity?
(I already recognized the
number, and notice how I take
control of the conversation)
[FE] Yes and
[Me] Fine, and I imagine
this phone call is going to be
recorded for training purposes
because you will no doubt
need to refer to it from time
to time.
[FE] Yes but
[Me] Now, before we get
started let me ask you a few
questions to make sure you
are qualifed to service my
account.
[FE] Okay.
[Me] As I am sure you are
not aware, I happen to be a
private banker, and unless you
too are a banker you may not
understand the terminology or
the intricacies of fnance and/
or the creation of the various
forms of money such as in this
instance credit and just who
exactly is the originator of said
credit.
[FE] Sir, I assure you I have
been doing this for four years
and prior to this I processed
loans for
[Me] So you say.
[FE] Excuse me, but I have
been in banking in some form
or another for approximately
twelve years and
[Me] Well then would you
please explain to me briefy
what the GAAP is and who
employs these principles?
[FE] The what?
[Me] The Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, surely
you know all about that?
[FE] Well actually
[Me] No matter, how about the
FAS?
[FE] I have heard about that
but I cant remember off the
top of
[Me] Can you please explain
to me the difference between
money of exchange, money of
account and lawful money of
the constitution?
[FE] Ive never
[Me] Would you please tell
me about how many different
aspects there are of a contract,
what makes it binding and
which part if vitiated would
give grounds for rescission
and recoupment?
[FE] Sir, my department
[Me] obviously hires people
that have absolutely no idea
about concepts in banking
which is by no means your fault
Hun. It probably also means
that there is no one in your
department that is qualifed to
service my contract that only
exists because I wish it.
[FE] I dont understand what
this has to do with the fact
that you owe us money and
are refusing to pay us!
[Me] Okay! Now we are getting
somewhere! Scroll down to
the part in the contract that
explains what constitutes a
payment, and then I will let
you educate me as to what was
extended, by whom and in what
form, and what is expected
in return and of course the
similarities that exist between
them. Go ahead, just locate
that part of the contract and I
will stand by.
[FE] Actually I dont have the
contract in front of me, that
would be customer service
and
[Me] Are you seriously going to
tell me that we are to discuss
the terms and conditions of
this contract and you dont
even have immediate access
to it?
[FE] Sir, if youll just let me
talk
[Me] Im just curious, can you
honestly tell me that you would
be willing to do business with
any fnancial institution for
any amount that hires people
to service your account who
have no idea what a contract
is, the nature of money,
what constitutes a fnancial
obligation, fnancial accounting
standards and who are only
qualifed to dial a phone and
read from a script?
[FE] Sir you dont have to be
rude, we
[Me] Actually, if anyone should
be insulted it should be me!
[FE] Sir you leave me no choice
but to report you to the Credit
Bureaus and turn this account
over to a Collection Agency
which adversely affects
[Me] Nothing would make
me happier. First of all, I
have you in default in this
commercial matter wherein
your corporation has admitted
to fraud on the contract, and
having said that the Copyright
which I have placed on my
name entitles me to $1.5 million
dollars for the infringement
of said Copyright for your
corporations attempt at
unjust enrichment. Secondly,
involving a Collection Agency
would be engaging in Off
balance sheet sales which is
a punishable crime. Not to
mention the fact that I would
use that Agency as my second
witness or they would be
guilty of being a third party
interloper having no right to
intervene in my contract with
another!
[FE] Do you honestly believe
that you can go around
stealing credit from credit card
companies and get away with
it?
[Me] And statements like that
convince me that you have no
idea of whats going on here
because I could be asking you
the same thing. When are
you going to stop stealing my
credit?
[FE] How about we let the
judge decide in court!
[Me] Ill tell you what. At this
juncture Im going to give you
two choices: you can either go
back to school for a few years
so we will have something to
talk about; or, you can hang
up while you still have some
dignity left!
She chose door number two!
A year ago I could not
have had that conversation
and certainly not the results.
Robert says in one or more
of his books, if you dont
understand money stop now.
He certainly doesnt mean if
youre not a banker this isnt
for you. He simply means that
the slave is not privy to the
masters plans. Hes trying to
tell us to learn, read, study,
apply and as with anything,
we will begin to understand.
In order to become a master,
seek not what the masters do,
rather, seek what the masters
sought, however, do it with
integrity, honesty, truth and
love for fellow mankind and
not with an agenda as do
the current powers that be!
My suggestion is to forget
everything you ever knew
because the truth is exactly
180o from what weve been
taught. I was just fipping
the channels this Sunday
morning, and I landed on PBS,
it was a kids show and a man
was dressed in a green suit
with a gold necklace donning
a huge dollar sign and he was
educating our children as to
how you get and keep credit.
And in a very condescending
and snide tone of voice he
said Do you think their just
going to give you credit? You
dont deserve credit until you
earn credit!!! They then had
a questionnaire followed by
a multiple choice and the
question was How do you get
good credit?
a. Pay the bill when you can
b. Pay your debts on time
c. Always pay the full amount
of your bill
Answers a and b were
supposedly the correct
answers. The only thing he
said that I would agree with is
If you dont take care of your
credit it will come back and
bite you in yourbutits time
to go now
If you dont learn how to
take care of your credit, then
you are not a creditor. You
are the source, the originator
of the creditSo take care of
yourself!
Everyday presents
opportunities to employ the
tools in the commercial process
of redemption that gradually
extract us from their grip
freeing us for the blessings to
come. I have since won three
small victories over Wells
Fargo, two collection agencies,
and I have managed to get
TransUnion to reverse all of
the derogatory items on my
report. Next will be Equifax,
and Experian the tougher of
the Big Three. And heads up,
the new kids on the block in
the world of credit reporting
are Novus Data Solutions
and Check Systems. Bank of
America has recently picked
a fght with me. Not because
I was delinquent on any of
my accounts with them but
because they like others will
occasionally take a peek at
your credit profle as an excuse
to limit your credit, raise your
interest and/or foreclose
on you or close the account
demanding full settlement due
to the high risk potential.
B of A based their
determination on what Wells
Fargo reported so of course
I wanted to know what their
connection with them was to
12 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
The Federal Reserve: History of Lies, Thievery, and Deceit
by Dr. Ken Matto
Former Congressional
Candidate, 6th District N.J.
"I place economy among
the frst and most important
virtues, and public debt as
the greatest of dangers. To
preserve our independence,
we must not let our rulers
load us with perpetual
debt."
Thomas Jefferson
D
id You Ever Wonder Why
The National Debt Keeps
Going Up and Up?
One of the most ungodly and
fraudulent institutions ever
perpetrated on the American
people and the world, is the
Federal Reserve System which
through deceit became the
central bank of the United
States in 1913. The idea
came about on a meeting in
Jekyl Island off the coast of
Georgia in 1910. The bankers
in this country, especially J.P.
Morgan, created a currency
panic in 1907 in order to get
the American people to accept
the idea of a central bank.
A central bank already
existed in England from as far
back as 1694. The Rothschilds
completely dominate the
banking system. It is estimated
their wealth goes into the
trillions.
Baron Nathan Mayer
Rothschild boasted:
"I care not what puppet
is placed upon the throne of
England to rule the Empire
on which the sun never sets.
The man that controls Britain's
money supply controls the
British Empire, and I control
the British money supply."
The idea of a central bank is
to so enslave the people of the
country to a debt money system
that you continue to collect
taxes continuously which just
covers the interest. The duped
people of the United States
are paying about $350 billion
dollars per year to the IRS
which is the collection agency
for the Federal Reserve. By the
way, the Federal Reserve is a
privately owned bank with 10
private members.
The Chase Manhattan Bank
is a member which is owned
by the Rockefellers who are
Rothschild Agents. I will list
the ten member banks at the
end of this article..
At this point the citizens of
the United States falsely owe
these lemmings over 10 trillion
dollars. Have you ever asked
the following question?
WHO HAS THAT MUCH
MONEY TO LOAN TO THE
UNITED STATES?
During the time of the
Babylonian captivity of Judah,
a man named Jacob Egibi
became the founding father of
modern banking. While Judah
was in captivity, Jacob began a
business of loaning out money
for a rate of interest. During
the Reign of King Kandalanu of
Babylon (circa 648-625 B.C.)
a new phenomenon appeared
on the scene which Jacob
Egibi played a major part,
and that was the invention of
private banking. There were 2
prominent families at this time,
they were the Egibi family and
the Iranu families.
These 2 families are not a
fgment of imagination as their
names have appeared in many
cuneiform tablets discovered
by Archaeologists. It is believed
that the Egibi family was taken
with the frst captivity into
Assyria and then later migrated
to Babylon. At the time of the
70 year captivity, Jacob Egibi
already had an ongoing private
banking business in which
he collected large sums of
interest. Now we have secular
insight as to why many of the
Jews did not want to return
with Nehemiah to rebuild the
temple at Jerusalem.
By the time of the end of the
captivity, many of the others
who were in captivity with the
Egibi families learned this evil
business practice and began to
set up shop. A good example
of this are the moneychangers
which the Lord Jesus Christ
threw out of the temple. As
a friend of mine said to me
many times, "Christ drove
the moneychangers from the
temple and was crucifed 4
days later."
During the time of the Persian
period, loan sharking became
a business where interest
rates of anywhere from 30-
50% were charged. As time
went on, the writings of the
Roman historian Tacitus, tells
us that during the reigns of
Caesar Augustus (27 BC - 14
AD) and Tiberius (14-32 AD)
records of the Roman empire
reveal deposits, withdrawals,
brokers fees and loans. When
the western Roman Empire fell,
banking continued to thrive
in Egypt, Byzantium, and the
Arab nations of the Red Sea.
When the Christian era began
to take hold and the church
became a powerful entity, she
returned to the Old Testament
Edict of not charging usury and
this idea continued up until the
time of the Renaissance when
banks began appearing across
Europe. To show you how
some kings despised usury, I
offer 2 quotations:
...if any man is found
taking usury, his lands will
be confscated, and he will
be banished from England...
Alfred the Great, King of
England; 849-901 A.D.
...If a man is found taking
usury, his
lands will be
confscated. It
is like taking a
man's life, and
it must not be
t o l e r a t e d . . .
James 1, King
of England;
1 5 6 6 - 1 6 2 5
A.D.
With the rise
of international
trade which
c o mme n c e d
at the end of
the medieval
period, many of
the banks were
allowed to coin
money for their transactions.
At that time, there was no such
thing as national money and
when the banks minted coins,
they were all of different value
which created a dilemma for
international trade. The frst
"Christian" gold coins were
struck by Emperor Frederick
II in 1225 A.D. Then came
the "ducats'' of Portugal,
the "forins" of Florence, the
"agnels" of France, and the
"sequins" which became the
offcial coins of Genoa and
Venice.
Europe then progressed from
the Feudal system and with this
came trade between different
nations which resulted in
foreign moneys accumulating
in the various cities in Europe.
1694: The Year which
Doomed the World's
Economies
The government of King
William III was in desperate
need of money. When learning
of this situation, a man named
William Patterson put together
a cartel of wealthy men, of
which he was the leader.
Patterson and cronies agreed
to loan the King 1,200,000
pound sterling which would
have been approximately 6
million dollars at 8% interest
per annum on the condition
that the king would grant 2
things:
1) He would grant Patterson
and his associates
a charter which
would name
them "The Bank
of England," and
2) This bank shall
have the "sole
and exclusive
right" to issue
notes to the
fullest extent of
its capital.
The people
were having a
problem with
their gold and
silver coins
of which the
bankers quickly
came to the rescue. The
solution is aptly described by
Professor Carroll Quigley in his
book, Tragedy and Hope:
...for generations men
had sought to avoid the
one drawback of gold, its
heaviness, by using pieces
of paper to represent specifc
pieces of gold. Today we call
such pieces of paper "gold
certifcates." Such a certifcate
entitled its bearer to exchange
it for pieces of gold on demand,
but in view of convenience of
paper, only a small fraction
of certifcate holders ever did
make such demands. It early
became clear that gold need
be held on hand only to the
amount needed to cover the
fraction of certifcates likely
to be presented for payment;
accordingly the rest of the gold
could be used for business
purposes, or, what amounts
to the same thing. A volume
of certifcates could be issued
greater than the volume of
gold reserved for payment....
Such an excess volume of
paper claims against reserves
we now call bank notes. In
effect, this creation of paper
claims greater than the
reserves available means that
bankers were creating money
out of nothing...
The King literally granted the
Bank of England the legal right
to print all the money that
would be used in commerce
by the people and the
government. In other words
the Bank of England became
the sole money source of any
currency that was used in
English commerce by either
the people or the government.
If they needed more money,
they simply printed it. It is
said that by 1698 British
government owed 16 X 10 to
the 6 power pounds sterling to
the Bank of England. Keep in
mind this was only 4 years.
1773: The Second Date of
Infamy
In 1773, a wealthy goldsmith
and coin dealer named Mayer
Amschel Bauer (1743-1812)
summoned 12 wealthy and
infuential men to his place
of business in Frankfurt,
Germany. His purpose for
the meeting was to impress
upon these men that if they
pooled their resources, it was
possible to gain control of the
wealth, natural resources, and
manpower of the entire world.
He then outlined a 25 point
plan on how to accomplish it.
The plan was put into operation
and evidentiary information
exists that Bauer aligned
himself with Adam Weishaupt
who was the founder of the
Illuminati whose aim was and
still is world domination. Bauer
later changed his name to
Rothschild which means "red
shield." He took it from the
red sign which hung outside
his place of business. The
eagle was clutching 5 golden
arrows in its claws. It was
supposed to symbolize his fve
sons. Presently the red shield
represents the offcial coat of
arms of the city of Frankfurt,
Germany. Later on each of
the fve sons were dispatched
to a major city in Europe
to establish a branch of the
Rothschild banking frm.
Son #1 - Amschel - Remained
in Frankfurt and propelled
Germany to fnancial success
under Bismarck.
Son #2 - Salomon - Went to
Vienna, Austria. He became a
leader in the Austria-Hungary
Empire.
Son #3 - Nathan Mayer - Went
to England where he took
control of the Bank of England.
Son #4 - Carl - Went to
Naples where he became the
most powerful man in Italy
through his banking skills.
Son #5 - James Jacob - Went
to Paris where he established
the central bank. He was
credited with dominating the
fnancial destiny of the nation
of France.
By 1850, the House of
Rothschild represented more
wealth than all the families
of Europe. Shortly after he
formed the Bank of England,
William Patterson lost control
of it to Nathan Rothschild and
here is how he did it:
Nathan Rothschild was an
observer on the day the Duke of
Wellington defeated Napoleon
at Waterloo, Belgium. He knew
that with this information he
could make a fortune. He later
paid a sailor a big fee to take
him across the English Channel
in bad weather. The news of
Napoleon's defeat would take
a while to hit England. When
Nathan arrived in London,
he began selling securities
and bonds in a panic. The
other investors were deceived
into believing that Napoleon
won the war and was eyeing
England so they began to
sell their securities too. What
they were unaware of is that
Rothschild's agents were
buying all the securities that
were being sold in panic. In
See HISTORY
Continued on Page 22
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 13
By Judi McLeod
W
ith all eyes on the Big Os
Office of the President-
elect, very few know that
the Port of Los Angeles--the
nations largest--is now effec-
tively under the control of the
Peoples Republic of China.
The Port has purchased with
$1.7 million American tax
dollars via a port security grant
awarded by the
U.S. Department
of Homeland
security, a mobile
X-ray scanning
system, mounted
on a Mack Truck
chassis. The
scanning system
is owned by
Nuctech Company
Limited, owned
outright by Hu
Haifeng, the
son of Chinese
President Hu Jintao.
Sated with their Obama
victory, the mainstream media
is asleep at the switch, but
eagle eye Lou Dobbs is fagging
the America publics attention.
See Dobbs on YouTube.
Communist China couldnt
be any closer to America aside
from moving its Army right in.
Touted as sophisticated
and high-energy, the
X-ray scanning machine was
manufactured by Nuctech,
headquartered in Beijing.
The bid that included
the Nuctech scanner, which
was cheaper than rival bids
submitted by Smiths Detection,
a British company with offces
in New Jersey, and Rapiscan
Systems, of Torrance, CA, was
formally submitted to the port
by a small U.S.-based business
headquartered in Rancho Palos
Verdes, CA, known as DULY
Research Inc. (gsnmagazine.
com, Oct. 16, 2008). We were
cognizant of the fact that we
were the frst port to acquire this
Chinese system, said George
Cummings, the ports director
of homeland security. They
were the low bidder and they
complied with all the technical
requirements.
If Dobbs is worried, this latest
With all eyes on Obama. . .
Port of Los Angeles Security Under Control
of Chinese Presidents Son!
potential breach in security
doesnt bother Cummings: We
dont have any heartburn about
this. We did all the due diligence
we had to do. We took it to our
board. Were comfortable with
this decision.
Critics of the transaction,
swallowed up by mainstream
media focus on the recent
presidential election, raise the
specter of sensitive X-ray images
and cargo
ma n i f e s t s
being archived
on the X-ray
s c a n n i n g
system and,
p e r h a p s ,
t ransmi t t ed
via the
Internet back
to Nuctech in
China, or to
the Chinese
government.
Indeed, the
mobile system was required to
offer that technical capability
from the get-go.
The Nuctech set up makes
for a more comfortable
environment than the ongoing
transfer of information passed
on to China by industrial spies
active in other areas on U.S.
and Canadian soil.
Nuctech also conducts business
in Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and
Zimbabwe.
Setting itself apart from the
mainstream media, HDMK,
Strategy Communications, Media
Public Affairs, an organization
that has been engaged in
hundreds of high profle public
policy battles, is posing some
hard-line questions:
Will Nuctech X-ray machines
have any direct connection to the
U.S. Department of Homeland
security computer systems and
are there any frewalls in place?
Has Nuctech retained
Washington lobbyists to help
ease the approval for this
unprecedented expenditure of
U.S. security funds, and if so,
who are they?
Have United States Customs
and Border Patrol offcials visited
Nutech in China to approve
or to explore the prospect of
purchasing equipment for other
port security operations? If so,
who went to China, when?
If theres nothing to hide,
why wont Nuctech or DULY
Research in Los Angeles (the
winner of the contact for the
Port of Los Angeles) talk to the
media, asks HDMKs Trent D.
Duffy.
Most signifcantly, will images
taken by Nuctech X-ray
machines be portable?
What are the personnel
requirements needed to support
the Nuctech X-ray machines
in terms of operations,
maintenance, performance
checks, etc., in the Port of Los
Angeles?
Have any of these individuals
even undergone routine security
screening?
Who paid for Port of Los
Angeles offcials to travel to
China to visit Nuctech facilities?
Its been two years since the
Dubai Ports fasco was last on
the public radar screen. During
the high profle Dubai Ports
debacle, those who opposed
the sale of American ports to
Dubai, vowed that no foreign
government would be permitted
to acquire such strategic targets
in future.
The Port of Los Angeles is not
only one of them, its the biggest
of the lot.
Got your earplugs turned on,
Homeland Security Secretary
Michael Chertoff?
Rohrabacher Laments
Chinese Scanning
Technology For Use At
Port of Los Angeles Works
Against Long Term Interests
of U.S.
Huntington Beach, Oct 24
- During a segment to air
Friday, October 24th on CNNs
Lou Dobbs Tonight, Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher (R-CA) called
for tighter Department of
Homeland Security standards
for the procurement of new
technologies used to protect
our nations ports. The Port
of Los Angeles (POLA), the
nations largest and located
in Rep. Rohrabachers district,
has purchased a mobile X-ray
scanning system manufactured
by Chinese company Nuctech.
POLA is the frst U.S. port to
acquire the Chinese system.
We should not be depending
on Chinese technology for
our national security, said
Rohrabacher. Its not the fault of
the Port of Los Angeles for taking
the lowest bidder but rather the
fault of the federal government
for not setting standards
to prevent us from being
dependent on our adversaries
to provide equipment used for
national security purposes.
Rohrabacher pointed out in a
time of crisis, for example, the
Chinese could potentially disable
the equipment or withhold spare
parts.
What we have here is
symptomatic of a China trade
policy which as a whole has
worked against the long term
interests of the United States,
both economically and in
terms of national security, said
Rohrabacher.
The scanning equipment will
be used by the port police to
inspect trucks and cruise ships
scheduled to depart from the Port
of Los Angeles. Nuctechs CEO is
the son of Chinas President, Hu
Jintao and is headquartered in
Beijing.
Judi McLeod is an award-
winning journalist with 30 years
experience in the print media. A
former Toronto Sun columnist,
she also worked for the Kingston
Whig Standard.
Judi can be emailed at:
judi@canadafreepress.com

Excerpt from a speech delivered

in 1933, by Major General
Smedley Butler, USMC.
W
ar is just a racket. A
racket is best described,
I believe, as something that
is not what it seems to the
majority of people. Only a
small inside group knows what
it is about. It is conducted for
the benefit of the very the at
the expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense
at the coastline and nothing
else. If a nation comes over
here to fght, then we will fght.
The trouble with America is that
when the dollar only earns 6
percent over here, then it gets
restless and goes overseas to
get 100 percent. Then the
fag follows the dollar and
the soldiers
follow the
fag.
I would
not go to
war again as
I have done
to protect
some lousy
investment
of the
b a n k e r s .
There are only two things we
should fght for; one is the
defense of our homes and the
other is the Bill of Rights. War
for any other reason is simply
a racket.
There is not a trick in the
racketeering bat, that the
military gang is blind too. It
has its "fnger men" to point
out enemies, its "muscle men"
to destroy enemies, its "brain
men" to plan war preparations,
and a "Big Boss" Super-
Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a
military man to adopt such
a comparison. Truthfulness
compels me to. I spent thirty-
three years and four months
in active military service as
a member of this countrys
most agile military force, the
Marine Corps. Served in all
commissioned ranks from
Smedley Butler on Interventionism
Second Lieutenant to Major
General. During that period,
I spent most of my time being
a high-class muscle man for
Big Business, for Wall Street
and for the bankers. In short,
I was a racketeer, a gangster
for capitalism. I suspected
I was just part of a racket
at the time. Now I am sure
of it. Like all the members
of the military profession, I
never had a thought of my
own until I left the service.
My mental faculties remained
in suspended animation while
I obeyed the orders of the
higher ups. This is typical
with everyone in the military
service.
I helped Mexico, especially
Tampico, safe for American
oil interest in 1914. I helped
make Haiti
and Cuba
a decent
place for
the National
City Bank
boys to
c o l l e c t
r e v e n u e s
in. I helped
in the
raping of
half a dozen Central American
republics for the benefts of
Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long. I helped
purify Nicaragua for the
international banking house
of Brown Brothers in 1909-
1912 (where have I heard that
name before?) I brought light
to the Dominican Republic
for American Sugar interest
in 1916. In China, I helped
to see to it that Standard Oil
went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had
as the boys in the back room
would say, a swell racket.
Looking back on it, I feel that
I could have given Al Capone
a few hints. The best he could
do was to operate his racket in
three districts. I operated on
three continents.

I spent most of my time being a

high-class muscle man for Big
Business, for Wall Street and
for the bankers. In short, I
was a racketeer, a gangster
for capitalism.
Litrospheres Will Light the Night
L
itrospheres is a self-lu-
minous micro particles
invented by MPK Co. This
new light source can lasts 12
years without a single recharge
from electricity or sun expo-
sure. Litroenergy, the technol-
ogy behind Litrospheres, has
potential to save billions of
dollars in energy costs world-
wide. It surpasses all known
available lighting options for
cost/durability/reliability and
safety.
GlowPaint glow-in-the-
dark paint company, MPK
Co., has come up with self-
luminous micro particles called
Litrospheres which they say
are inexpensive, non-toxic,
and will stay on for 20+ years
(12 year half-life) continuously
-- without having to be plugged
into any power source. A year
later they announced that by
combining this with thin-flm
solar sheets they can generate
electricity continuously for the
same duration.
Winning the Grand Prize
in NASA's 2007 "Create The
Future" contest, [1] this
fuorescing microsphere
approach is a betavoltaic
technology, using a radioactive
gas, whose "soft" emission
of electrons from the beta
emitting gas cannot penetrate
the glass or polymer wall of the
microspheres. MPK is having
the Litroenergy Power Cells
tested for classifcation as non-
toxic and non-radioactive.
The Litrospheres are
not affected by heat or cold,
and are 5,000-pound crush
resistant. They can be injection
molded or added to paint.
The fll rate of Litroenergy
micro particles in plastic
injection molding material
or paint is about 20%. The
constant light gives off no U.V.
rays, and can be designed to
emit almost any color of light
desired.
"This has potential to save
billions in energy costs world-
wide. Litroenergy surpasses
all known available lighting
options for cost/durability/
reliability and safety." -- Steve
Stark, MPK Co.
Now, as of Oct. 17 2008,
the company has applied once
again to the NASA "Create the
Future". This time they are
announcing their intention to
combine their Litrospheres with
thin-flm solar sheets to create
a constant energy generator.
Already, after just a few days,
their submission has jumped to
frst place in popularity. [2]
"The many novel, versatile
and far reaching applications/
benefts for low cost on-going
durable, solid state power
generation without using any
additional resources and being
extremely environmentally
friendly has ground breaking
implications for our energy
consuming world." -- Michael
Kohnen, Inventor (Oct. 17,
2008)[3]
The company seeks to mass
produce this mateiral and
supply OEMs. The generator
product could be available as
soon as January, 2009.

14 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN

U.S. Begins Recalling ALL Retirees
Who EVER served in Any military Branch !
from the Hal Turner Show
T
he United States has begun
an astonishing "general
mobilization" of ALL retired
or honorably discharged
military members from ALL
branches of the service!
Letters have gone out to
several Million former soldiers,
sailors, airmen and Marines
which read as follows:
SUBJECT:
Recall from Retired Status
A. Name:***** *****
B. Retired grade: E-6
C. Serial Number: ***-**-****
D. PMOS:
E. Current mailing Address:
F. Date Retired: 10 OCT 86
Petty Offcer *****, You
have been selected for recall
to active duty for a period of
not less than three years; or
a period of time which will
extend beyond your 55th
birthday or 30 years active
Federal service whichever is
sooner and; You will not be
eligible for voluntary release
from active duty during the
period for which recalled, but
may be released from active
duty for the convenience
of the Government; and
while recalled, You will be
subject to all provisions of
the Uniform Code of Military
Justice including discharge
from the pursuant thereto
and all Navy regulations
including those providing for
administrative reduction; but
any administrative separation
from the will be accomplished
by releasing you from active
duty rather than by discharge,
except where other action
is directed by Headquarters,
Department of the Navy.
1. Enclosure
Report of Physical
Examination
To give you an idea of how
incredible this is, the last time
the United States made a
"general mobilization" was in
December, 1941.
General mobilization orders
usually take 120 days to show
an effect, which translates into
late February, early March,
2009.
Sadly, this time frame fts
with my prediction that the
United States government will
fnancially collapse by the end
of February and de-monetize
the US dollar as a currency,
wiping-out the life savings of
every citizen and paving the
way for introduction of the
AMERO to replace the dollar.
Involuntary recall is part of
all enlistment contracts in the
military. Whenever anyone
joins the military, they sign
a contract for their Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS)
and are told in writing they are
subject to being involuntarily
recalled into military service
FOREVER.
This general mobilization
will involve literally millions
of Americans and will prove
incredibly disruptive to millions
of families and to businesses
throughout our nation. The big
question is: WHY?
Why is this being done?
It seems to me that there are
only two possibilities:
1) We will be in another (huge)
war within the frst 6 months
of 2009 OR;
2) the government will collapse
and they fear being forcibly
overthrown by hostile citizens
angry at losing everything.
For my part, I hope the latter
is not the case because if the
politicians think the military
can, would - or even could
- protect them from their
own citizens, they are sadly
mistaken.
Here in the USA, 95 million
law-abiding citizens own over
212 million lawful frearms.
If even ten percent of those
gun owners were to rise-up
to overthrow the government,
the entire Army, Navy Air
Force and Marines would be
outnumbered more then ten
to one - even with this general
mobilization!
Any military members foolish
enough to fght the very citizens
they swore to protect, would
quickly fnd themselves dead.
Any foreign troops brought in
from overseas would be cut
down with a brutality they
cannot even imagine.
What is amazing to me about
this is the absolute, total
silence about it in our "main
stream" media. No information
about this mobilization is being
mentioned as news anywhere
in US media except in outlets
such as this web site.
More details as they become
available. . . . .

Editors comment; totally

unnecessary! From the county
sheriff up to the President, any
one of them can call out the
Posse Comitatus, the power
of the county, being men
between 18 and 45 and well
armed! The ORDER of the
day; PROTECT LIFE, LIBERTY
PROPERTY, YOUR HOMES, YOUR
COMMUNITY, COUNTY, STATE
AND NATION , PROTECT FROM
UMLAWFAUL INVASION OF
FOREIGN INVADERS, PROTECT
FROM ENIMIES FOREIGN OR
DOMESTIC, PROTECT LIFE,
LIBERTY AND HAPPINESS AND
THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE,
USE WHATEVER WEAPON(S)
OR FORCE NECESSARY,
WORK IN TEAMS, CELLS OR
OTHERWISE. MILITARY IS TO
BE IN SUBJECTION TO THE
CIVIL POWER THE CIVIL
POWER IS THE SOVEREIGN
PEOPLE. [NOT NESSESSARILY
POLITICIANS AND ELECTED
BUREAUCRATS. IF AT ALL
POSSIBLE REESTABLISH AND
OR MAINTAIN THE REPUBLIC
A GOVERNMENT OF THE
PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND
FOR THE PEOPLE REJECT
THE IMPOSITION OF THE
NEW WORLD ORDER AT ALL
COSTS. DO NOT SUBMIT TO
INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE OR
ANY FORM OF SLAVERY -LIVE
FREE DIE FREE. Nuff said!
P
ublic tours of the new
Homeland Interior Security
Government Operations
Communications Data and
Intelligence Mining Operation
(HISGOCDIMO pronounced
his-GAWK-diemo ) are not
scheduled until the end of
May.
Until then, work continues
apace on the 842-acre site
that includes 1, 720-foot
Sandstone Mountain. You can
observe work going on in the
distance from the overlook on
Arkansas 127 about fve miles
east of the turnoff to War
Eagle Caverns. The facility
entrance is alongside Rambo
Creek and will be accessed via
Kirk Hollow Road.
That road is currently
blocked off and local residents
are forced to use Cobble Lane
to reach the homes farther
north that overlook Beaver
Lake.
The government picked
the Sandstone Mountain site
because the land was fairly
cheap, the mountain has a
steep southern sandstone face
that will easily accommodate
the mile-deep rabbit warren
data mining facility, and
the Interstate 540 corridor
that includes Fayetteville,
Springdale, Rogers, Bentonville
and Bella Vista lies a mere 15
miles to the west.
That's a big plus because the
facility will eventually employ
2, 400 highly skilled data
engineers who will initially
be trained at the University
of Arkansas Tyson College of
Information Technology.
Supervisors and upper
management will receive
additional training at the
university's Sam M. Walton
College of Business Acumen.
In addition, the mountain will
be relatively easy to secure. It's
scenic, and its remoteness has
an advantage over more urban
areas where the possibility of
informational compromise
poses a higher threat.
Work has already been
completed on the 40-acre
landscaped "green" parking
area, which will feature
shredded indigenous walnut
shells over dolphin-safe drains
to collect rainwater to be
recycled into myriad facility
uses.
The median islands in the
parking plaza will be used to
grow row crops.
Green will be the theme of
the entire $ 18 billion facility,
which will be 95 percent
underground and a constant
68 degrees. Wind turbines
made from recycled plastic
Coke bottles will line the
ridge above and be coupled
with solar panels to keep the
facility totally off the grid and
self-suffcient.
If $ 18 billion sounds like a lot
for national security, it's not.
Now is no time to be penny-
wise and pound-foolish.
The mission of HISGOCDIMO
is simple. The database will
monitor and store the Internet
browsing habits, e-mail, credit
card purchases and mobile
telephone records of more
than 300 million Americans in
an effort to root out threats to
our national security.
Granted, it is a daunting
task, but the state-of-the-
art HISGOCDIMO computers
(they can handle 15 petabytes
of data every year ) will be
ever vigilant, and if nefarious
ne'er-do-wells think they can
hide like Waldo among the
clutter, they have another
think coming. The government
already conducts random and
occasional checks of e-mail
and cell phone usage, but
the facility has not existed
before to collect, interpret,
discern and store all the data.
Scoffaws and charlatans have
been able to slip through the
cracks.
And since, for example, more
than 200 billion text messages
were sent in the United States
last year alone, those who are
plotting evil felt fairly secure
in their covens of covertness.
Not anymore. Until next time,
Kalaka reminds you that it's
for your own good.

Editor comment; Well now,

Im sure your government has
a good excuse to violate your
4th & 5th amendment right
to be secure in your papers,
houses and effects and that
you cannot be compelled to
provide info that can be used
against you. However, it could
presumed that if you are
making voluntarily statements
on the phone, irrespective
of the fact that you are not
a foreign terrorist, do you
consent to such tactics of the
government to monitor your
phone calls and emails. so
in the event they can use
whatever you say against you?
Id suggest that you be very
careful of what you say on the
phone and emails. Dont use
certain key words. However,
Id suggest that you qualify
your phone calls via per
this phone call, I do not agree
nor consent to this phone call
being taped by the federal
government and I do not waive
my 4th & 5th Amendment as
it operates upon the agent of
government. Same applies to
emails. Be aware!
The Feds are watching
. . . . . . and listening
Federal eavesdropping center going up in Madison County. $39.00
$38.00
$41.00
$19.00
$17.00
$17.00
$16.00
$14.00
$24.00
$25.00
$31.00
$37.00
$23.00
$46.00
$30.00
$26.00
$15.00
$32.00
$22.00
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 15
A
revenue agent with the
Internal Revenue Service
has been arrested in connec-
tion with a scheme to defraud
the government by claiming
that he suffered a loss when
he sold his real estate, when
in fact he realized a substan-
tial profit.
Jim H. Liu, 42, of Diamond
Bar, California, was arrested
Sunday night at Los Angeles
International Airport. Liu was
indicted last week by a federal
grand jury on three counts
one count of submitting
a false tax return and two
counts of obstructing the
IRS investigation into his tax
return. Liu is employed by the
IRS as a revenue agent and
conducts audits of taxpayers.
Liu made his initial court
appearance on Monday in
United States District Court,
and was released on a $30,000
bond. He is scheduled to be
arraigned on November 24.
The indictment charges that
Liu fled a false tax return
that improperly claimed a loss
on his sale of a property on
Chanslor Street in Pomona.
According to the indictment,
Liu actually sold the Chanslor
property for a substantial gain,
and should have paid taxes on
that substantial gain.
The indictment also alleges
that during the IRS audit of
Liu's tax return, he provided
false documents and made
false statements to the IRS
in an attempt to obstruct the
audit. Liu allegedly mailed
and faxed documents to the
IRS that falsely stated that he
bought the Chanslor property
for $231,250, when he knew
that he had actually purchased
it for $185,000.
Julie Parodi, Special Agent
in Charge of the Treasury
Inspector General for Tax
Administration, which
investigates corrupt IRS
employees, stated: "The
taxpaying public expects IRS
IRS Revenue Agent
Commits Tax Fraud
MADOFF
Continued From Page 1
employees to fle and pay their
taxes like everyone else. It is
an embarrassment to the IRS
when an IRS employee who is
supposed to enforce the tax
laws is charged with breaking
those laws. Corrupt IRS
employees undermine public
confdence in the t ax system
and will be investigated and
prosecuted to the full extent
of the law."
If he is convicted of the
charges alleged in the
indictment, Liu faces a
maximum statutory penalty of
13 years in federal prison.
An indictment contains
allegations that a defendant
has committed a crime.
Every defendant is presumed
innocent until and unless
proven guilty.
The federal investigation
of Liu was conducted by the
Treasury Inspector General for
Tax Administration.

Editor comment; since IRS

IS NOT an agency of the United
States Federal Government,
inc., should not the IRS agents
be extradited back to their
Principal/employer, i.e., Queen
of England to be prosecuted?
holdings were exposed to
Madoff, sending shares in the
UK asset manager crashing.
CNBC Television reported
that Sterling Equities, which
owns the New York Mets
baseball team, had accounts
managed by Madoff.

"Unfortunate Set of events"
Madoff said "there is no
innocent explanation" for his
activities, and that he "paid
investors with money that
wasn't there," according to the
federal complaint.
Prosecutors also accused
Madoff of wanting to distribute
as much as $300 million to
employees, family members
and friends before turning
himself in.
Charged with one count of
securities fraud, he faces up
to 20 years in prison and a $5
million fne. The U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission
fled separate civil charges.
A hearing had been
scheduled for Friday afternoon
in U.S. District Court in
Manhattan on the SEC's
request to grant powers to
the court-appointed receiver
to oversee the entire frm, as
well as on the commission's
request for a frmwide asset
freeze.
But the hearing was
canceled after the matter
was resolved, said a deputy
for U.S. District Judge Louis
been retained by "dozens of
individual investors" in Madoff
Securities.
The two most prominent
hedge funds that invested
with Madoff were the $7.3
billion Fairfeld Sentry Ltd,
run by Walter Noel's Fairfeld
Greenwich Group, and the $2.8
billion Kingate Global Fund Ltd,
run by Kingate Management
Ltd.
Fairfeld Greenwich Group
said it was trying to determine
the extent of potential losses
and vowed to pursue recovery
of any lost assets. The frm
said it had been working with
Madoff for nearly 20 years.
Fairfeld Sentry and Kingate
Global were among a small
group of hedge funds to report
positive returns for 2008; the
average hedge fund was down
18 percent, according to data
from Hedge Fund Research.
"People who came to us
for portfolio construction
were often already invested
with Bernie Madoff. He had
hundreds of clients," said
Charles Gradante, who invests
in hedge funds as a principal
at Hennessee Group LLC. "Now
his whole legacy is destroyed.
He was God to people."
Prior to Madoff's arrest,
investors had wondered how
he was able to generate
annual returns in the low
double digits in a variety of
market environments. Many
questioned how U.S. regulators
were able to ignore numerous
red fags with regard to
Madoff's operations.
"Many of us questioned how
that strategy could generate
those kinds of returns so
consistently," said Jon Najarian,
an options trader who knows
Madoff and is a co-founder of
optionmonster.com.
In May 2001, Barron's
reported that option strategists
for major investment banks
said they could not understand
how Madoff managed to
generate the returns that he
did.
"We weren't comfortable
with Madoff," said Brad Alford,
president at investment adviser
Alpha Capital in Atlanta. "We
didn't understand how his
strategy could generate the
kind of returns it did. We will
walk away from things like
that."

More to Come?
U.S. stocks tumbled in early
trading on Friday, with some
investors citing the Madoff
case as well as the failure of
talks in Congress on a rescue
for the U.S. auto industry.
The market later rebounded,
with the Dow Jones industrial
average closing 0.75 percent
higher for the day.
Investors overseas were
reeling from the alleged fraud.
Benedict Hentsch, a Swiss
private bank, said it had 56
million Swiss francs ($47
million) of exposure to Madoff's
investment advisory business.
Italian bank UniCredit
SpA's fund management unit,
Pioneer Investments, has
exposure through its Primeo
Select hedge fund, two people
familiar with the matter said.
Bramdean Alternatives Ltd
said almost 10 percent of its
Stanton. No other details were
immediately available. The
receiver, lawyer Lee Richards,
had been appointed by the
judge on Thursday to oversee
assets and accounts of the
frm held abroad.
Madoff's lawyer, Dan
Horwitz, said on Thursday:
"We will fght to get through
this unfortunate set of events."
His client was released on $10
million bond.
Madoff is a member of
Nasdaq OMX Group Inc's
nominating committee. His
frm has said it is a market-
maker for about 350 Nasdaq
stocks.
He is also chairman
of London-based Madoff
Securities International Ltd,
whose chief executive, Stephen
Raven, said the frm was "not
in any way part of" the New
York-based market-maker.
All equity trades involving
the market-making frm will
be processed as usual, the
Depository Trust Clearing Corp
told Reuters on Friday.
--------
(Reporting by Jennifer Ablan,
Edith Honan, Aarthi Sivaraman,
Leah Schnurr, Dan Wilchins
and Phil Wahba in New York,
Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston,
Steve Slater in London and
Lisa Jucca in Zurich; editing by
Jeffrey Benkoe, John Wallace,
Toni Reinhold, Gary Hill.)
1. What are the two major changes that will happen
once I do the Redemption process?

Answer; after laying the foundation (Redemption Manual
4th Edition (RDM4) & The Redemption Companion) what
changes is your knowledge base and your status as
secured party creditor, (private banker) THEN learn all you
can about discharging the debts! Never stop learning!
2. Can I access the funds in the UCC contract trust
account for day to day living expenses?

Answer; NO! Your private credit and that of the UCC
Contract trust Account is to offset or discharge debt only!
(at this time!)
3. How can I buy a house and not enter into contract
with the government?

Answer; one must acquire the debt in the normal way,
with a down payment or no down payment (some banks
will sell property with no $$$ down) and once you have
the mortgage contract, do CAFV and then discharge the
mortgage contract/debt/liability.

4. I fled my UCC-1 in my birth state. Am I done
with the redemption process?

Answer; if you followed the RDM4, so long as you did the
Charge Back. Current RDM4 has incorporated the Birth
Certifcate Bond, which you can amend and send in or
when necessary, do a another charge back with another
certifed copy of your Birth Certifcate.

5. The electric company keeps sending me bills with
my name on them. Are they violating my copy right
on my name?

Answer; NO! Well, not really, as corporation and
government can only interface with the artifcial corporate
entity and since you aided in establishing the contract
for services on behalf of your debtor, they need to send
the bill/presentment TO YOUR DEBTOR so that you can
accept it for value and return it for discharge. Some have
communicated with the utility company by letter to get
agreement of acceptance of the credit instrument to cover
5 years +/- of the average bill plus a percentage (40 to
50%). I have no other info on this!
I am Neo, I come and go from the Matrix, I am the One!
If you are secured party creditor, you are also the One and
like me, you will come into knowing what you can do do
not give up!
16 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
Source: RawStory
B
arry Cooper, a former
Texas police officer with
eight years of specialty in drug
interdiction, first made waves
when he released the film
"Never Get Busted Again,"
a how-to guide for evading
police drug seizures.
Austin, Texas-based
Cooper's latest project is not
nearly so benign, and will likely
generate for the former drug
warrior an army of enemies in
law enforcement.
'KopBusters' is a reality
TV program that aims to sink
crooked offcers.
"KopBusters rented a house
in Odessa, Texas and began
growing two small Christmas
trees under a grow light similar
to those used for growing
marijuana," claims a release
f romNeverGetBusted. com
"When faced with a suspected
marijuana grow, the police
usually use illegal FLIR cameras
and/or lie on the search
warrant affdavit claiming they
have probable cause to raid the
house. Instead of conducting
a proper investigation which
usually leads to no probable
cause, the Kops lie on the
affdavit claiming a confdential
informant saw the plants
and/or the police could smell
marijuana coming from the
suspected house."
"The trap was set and
less than 24 hours later,
the Odessa narcotics unit
raided the house only to fnd
KopBuster's attorney waiting
under a system of complex
gadgetry and spy cameras
that streamed online to the
KopBuster's secret mobile
offce nearby.
"The attorney was
handcuffed and later released
when eleven KopBuster
detectives arrived with the
media in tow to question the
illegal raid. The police refused
to give KopBusters the se
arch warrant affdavit which is
suspected to contain the lies
regarding the probable cause.
"It is not illegal to grow
plants under a light in your
home but it is illegal to lie on
an affdavit and plant drugs
on a citizen. This operation
was the frst of its kind in
the history of America. Police
sometimes have other police
investigating their crimes but
the American court system
has never dealt with a group
of citizens stinging the police.
Will the police fle charges on
the team who took down the
corrupt cops? We will keep you
posted."
Cooper's "Never Get Busted
Again" was a runaway success,
the sales of which serve as
fnancial support for this most
recent project.
"The drug war is a failed
policy and the legal side effects
on the families are worse than
the drugs," Cooper said to the
Dallas Observer in early 2007.
"I was so wrong in the things I
did back then. I ruined lives."
The 'Kop Busters' sting was
the feature of a CBS 7 report,
aired Dec. 4, 2008.

KopBusters Busts Crooked Cops

I
t may be easier to Convict
public officials on Usurpation
than it is on Treason. Usurpation
is generally disparaged in that
it connotes power taken rath-
er than legitimately received.
Thus, usurpation is in essence
high level Thievery.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary,
Third Revision (8th Edition)
(1914) , Volume 3, page
3380; A usurper may also be
a properly constituted offcial
acting ultra vires, i.e. outside
his authority or jurisdiction.
In 1649 King Charles I
of England was executed
as a usurper exceeding his
authority and encroaching on
that of Parliament.
In three separate sentences
the United States Declaration
of Independence of 1776
mentions "usurpations" of
power by the government of
King George III as justifcation
for the American Revolution.
Usurpation is in essence high
level thievery.
http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/
Usurper
Citizenship and Usurpation
The U.S. Declaration of
Independence indicates that
citizens have the "duty" to
resist grievous usurpations,
viz. ..."it is their right, it is
their duty, to throw off such
Government..."
The Declaration was written
during the 18th century when
many if not most citizens in
America were led by Christian
principles that bear heavily on
the issue of their civic duties.
Romans 13 of the New
Testament, focuses on
submission to the higher
powers. But Americans
oppressed by George III
learned from their ministers
(see below, Mayhew) that
in Romans 13: 3-4, the
Apostle Paul sets forth a
reciprocity principle, indicating
that when the government
defends righteousness, the
people should in turn pay it
obedience.
By extrapolation, conversely,
when government fails in its
duty as respects right rule, civic
duty to obey is suspended. In
other words, the powers-that-
be sometimes become terrors
to the best elements in society,
punishing good and rewarding
evil, (reversing Romans 13:
3-4),
According to John Adams,
an oft reprinted sermon of 1750
by the Rev. Jonathan Mayhew
of Boston that provided "the
spark that ignited the American
Revolution." Mayhew's central
point was that usurpers lose
their claim on the allegiance of
the people in proportion as...
All commands running counter
to the declared will of the
supreme legislator of heaven
and earth, are null and void:
And therefore disobedience to
them is a duty, not a crime.
Another thing that may be
asserted with equal truth and
safety, is, that no government
is to be submitted to, at the
expense of that which is the
sole end of all government,
the common good and safety
of society.
Judicial Usurpation in the
United States
There have been cases of
judicial usurpation throughout
judicial history. Well before the
rise of Hannibal Barca, ancient
Carthage saw its highest
tribunal, The Hundred and
Four, expand its constitutional
powers and convert the
Usurpation . . .
What should be Done about it?
Carthaginian republic into a
tyranny. Millennia later, in his
Farewell Address President
George Washington urged: If,
in the opinion of the people, the
distribution or modifcation of
the constitutional powers be in
any particular wrong, let it be
corrected by an amendment in
the way which the Constitution
designates. But let there be
no change by usurpation; for
though this, in one instance,
may be the instrument of good,
it is the customary weapon by
which free governments are
destroyed. The precedent must
always greatly overbalance in
permanent evil any partial or
transient beneft....
Black's Law Dictionary
defnes usurpation as the
"assumption of government
or supreme power by force
or illegally, in derogation of
the constitution and of the
rights of the lawful ruler the
unlawful seizure or assumption
of sovereign power. The
assumption of government or
sovereign power by force or
illegality, in derogation of the
constitution and of the rights
of the lawful ruler [in the USA
We the people!] Usurpation
involves attempted exercise
of power not possessed by
inferior offce.

USURPATION. The unlawful
assumption of the use of
property which belongs to
another; an interruption or the
disturbing a man in his right
and possession.
In Governmental Law. The
tyrannical assumption of the
government by force,
contrary to and in violation
of the constitution of the
country.
Here is an current Example
of Usurpation.
Last week, the Texas 3rd
Court of Appeals ruled that
the CPS had overreached its
authority
http://www.star- telegram.
com/804/story/ 667252.html
An appeals court ruled
Thursday that Texas didn't
have the authority
http://abcnews. go.com/
TheLaw/ story?id= 4911318
The order follows a ruling by
the Texas Supreme Court that
said the state overstepped its
authority.
http://www.voanews. com/
english/ 2008-06-02-voa47.
cfm
"Legislation from the bench"
is a case in point, according
to Originalists. They argue
that black-robed usurpers
have targeted the law-making
power which the Constitution
(Article I, section I) extends to
the Congress alone.
Such political evaluations are
also seconded by some sectors of
academia. The November, 1996
and January, 1997 issues of the
religious / political journal, First
Things, with its symposium,
"The End of Democracy? The
Judicial Usurpation of Politics,"
is noteworthy. A majority of
the contributors had come to
the conclusion that the United
States had already arrived (or
nearly so) at a despotism or
dictatorship headed by the
Federal Judiciary.
Usurpation- What should
be Done about it?
Editor comment; What to
do, well, since the system
courts are administering the
bankruptcy and you most
likely would not fnd remedy
therein, I suggest the private
administrative process
(CAFV) and Tort Claim on the
injury of usurpation, fraud,
c o n s t i t u t i o n a l
i mp e r mi s s i b l e
application of
statute, fraud
by scienter and
otherwise. Become
the Creditor, do
the CAFV, fle the
Tort Claim as your
exclusive remedy.
Its far better to
stand there as the
Creditor holding the private
judgment/accounts receivable
than to stand there with no
standing and holding nothing
as the debtor to the acts of
your Master; the Corporate
state!

which they denied any.

So they chose to punish
me for an issue that was res
judicata, already having Wells
Fargo in default wherein they
admitted to committing fraud
against me! Needless to say
I fred up the CAFV and gave
them a little taste of what was
to come having dishonored me.
Play nice children or Mamma
Cafv will take away your toys!
I have to date been successful
at discharging thousands of
dollars in debt, restored a large
portion of my credit, and for the
ones that didnt want to play
nice, I am now in the position
to tort and in some cases
reaches into the millions. I will
let you know along the way of
my success in these matters
in future articles. Remember
go to peace not war. Get the
agreement to discharge the
liability. Its like any master
of martial arts who uses the
momentum of his adversary
to defeat him. He redirects the
energy of the attacker. So you
must be dealing with the real
issues, the truth of the matters
as laid out in your CAFV, not
what they would have you
believe is the truth about
money, credit, and who has
the fnancial obligation. One of
the major differences between
them and us is, they are the
masters of mis-direction (they
have to be they are dealing
in fraud) and we are to be
the masters of re-direction.
One has the connotation of
missing its mark while the
other re-turning to it as the
facts operates in your favor.
Its the difference in saying
hey, look over here and hey,
look what I have here!
The system, believe it or not
tells you everyday where the
answer lies, you just need to
learn the language. The classic
example of mis-direction is like
Abbott and Costellos Who
is on frst. You have already
been told but it is done in such
a way that that you dont know
the answer has been given, so
you continue to look elsewhere
or give up completely.
Once you learn the language,
you can talk less and say more.
Until the next time, may you
be blessed in all you do.

DEBT
Continued From Page 11
Cops get busted on 'KopBusters' TV show:
http://nevergetbusted.com:80/v2/node/176
the unlawful seizure or
assumption of sovereign
power. Usurpation
involves attempted exercise
of power not possessed by
inferior offce.
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 17
What Doesn't Exist?
The foundation of the
following article was in
the previous issue. The
following is taken from two
letters the author wrote
and one from the STATE
OF OREGON LEGISLATIVE
COUNSEL COMMITTEE. The
question for the most part
has been answered but I
am seeking a more formal
answer, but otherwise Im
sure the reader will fnd this
insertion quite interesting.
Richard L. Koenig
T
he author has been seek-
ing irrefutable confirmation
of what Department of Justice
(DOJ) spokesman, John Ellis,
told him in 1995; Basically,
Driver licenses are for profes-
sional drivers, having no appli-
cation to the general public
who use their vehicles [auto-
mobiles] as a matter of right.
The Office of Legislative Counsel
is the institutional memory of
Oregons Legislative Assembly.
Legislative Counsel, Dexter
Johnson, is the Legislatures
current expert regarding
Oregons law making history.
NO ONE has standing to
question Mr. Johnsons best
guess in response to the
following demand for a public
record. According to the Rules
of Evidence, Mr. Johnsons
response can only be rebutted
when the Act requiring the
general public to be licensed to
travel is produced.
However, the 2007 Legislative
Assembly voted overwhelmingly
to retain the publics RIGHT to
use the highway, (HB 3445).
The author is an unrebutted
Expert Witness in traffc court
and teaches traffc court
procedures.
The following was transmitted
by FAX July 31, 2008:
To: Mary Nolan, State
Representative
From: Richard L. Koenig,
Committee for Appropriate
Enforcement of Motor Vehicle
Laws
Dear Representative Nolan:
I want to thank you again for
your help in making me a more
informed Oregonian, so that I
can be responsible for holding
up my end of society. While
Im carrying on in this vein, let
me share with you why I am so
thankful.
The statutes at ORS 336.057
and 336.067 require public
schools to provide courses
(not classes) in Constitutional
Studies each year, beginning
no later than the eight grade
and continuing through a four
year college degree with
a special emphasis on the
Oregon Constitution.
We, as Oregonians have been
systematically deprived of
these courses, to the point
where most of us believe that
our system of government is
an oligarchy, aristocracy or
some form of joint monarchy,
oxymoron that that may be.
Please do a little check of
your own to see where my
concern comes from. Ask your
friends, and your associates in
the legislature who swore to
support the constitutions to tell
you where the delegation of
authority begins in a republican
form of government, which
by the supreme law of the
land is what were stuck with.
The answer is in the very
frst sentence of the Oregon
Constitution, and it also
packs in a description of the
three legitimate functions of
government.
To lay certain mythology
to rest, that can only have
existence in an illiterate society,
I an making the following:
PUBLIC RECORD LAW
DEMAND under authority of
ORS 192.420:
for a session law in which the
Oregon Legislature expressly
stated its intent to amend the
Motor Vehicle Laws of Oregon,
recorded in the sessions laws of
1911, Chapter 174 wherein the
subject class is described in the
frst sentence as drivers for
hire:, to subsequently include
members of the general
public, as that term is used
at ORS 801.305. The public
record law does not require a
public body to create a record,
so if the record I demand does
not exist, just say so with an
economy of words NO SUCH
RECORD EXISTS.
Place your response to this
demand in the mail to arrive at
the address as appears below
within fourteen days. You
may request additional time to
respond by briefy stating the
reason for your request and a
date certain for delivery. As it
is essential for the public to be
informed of any law which might
compel their performance, and
essential that we know about
corruption in government, I am
petitioning for waiver of cost of
reproduction. Sincerely
Dexter A. Johnson
Legislative counsel responded
August 18, 2008 via the
following:
Mr. Koenig, I am responding
on behalf of Representative
mary Nolan to your public record
request dated by you on July
31, 2008, and received by our
offce on August on August 12,
2008. The records you request
include session law chapter
174, Oregon Laws 1911 that
is already in the public domain
and available at your county
law library. The remaining
records you request are not in
the custody of Representative
Nolan and probably do not
exist. (emphasis added!)
The following was transmitted
by FAX July 31, 2008:
To: Mary Nolan, State
Representative
From: Richard L. Koenig,
Committee for Appropriate
Enforcement of Motor Vehicle
Laws
Dear Representative Nolan:
In our society it is fundamental
that the people have a right to
ask for and expect to receive a
copy of any law that compels
the performance of the people,
so that they may determine the
lawfulness and particulars of
the law and make an informal
choice to be bound by it or to
petition government (or in the
case of Oregons Constitutional
language at Article I, Section
26, the legislature) for redress
of grievance. I had no doubt
that you would honor your
solemnly sworn oath of offce
and respond to my demand for
the law that requires someone
other than drivers for hire to
be licensed, by stating that it
does not exist.
For me, having that response
will mean the difference
between being free and being
incarcerated for questioning
the popular myth that says:
Everybody has to have a
driver license.
When armed force compels
compliance with mythical laws
and money is demanded for its
violation, power will corrupt and
greed will never be satisfed.
Inevitably there will come a time
when people will start putting
themselves in harms way to
question authority. Educated
folks must expect this, it is
not a new phenomenon, nor
unique to this century of this
culture. I am one of a growing
number of the people who are
now demanding, Show me the
law. Inevitably, demanding
to be shown the authority that
highway dependant corporate
entities and insurance cartels
have been using to reap
unlawful profts has led to overt
hostilities.
I have been jailed several
times, beaten up, suffered
warrantless seizure of
my personal vehicles,
[automobiles!] repeatedly
been hauled into court,
wherein I was deprived of
right to counsel, trial by jury,
to be found guilty only beyond
a reasonable doubt, and then
convicted in absence of a victim
or culpable mental state. I
have gone years without living,
in any normal sense of the
word, in order to address the
systemic corruption that Dexter
Johnsons letter of August 18th
confrms. My emotional and
physical health has suffered
and relationships I would have
cultivated have withered. I am
letting you know of the extent
of which I have been impacted
by my search for truth, so you
can appreciate the depth of
my gratitude for facilitating
the response to my demand
from someone who is beyond
question.
Before attending to problem
mitigation, there are a few
details that need straightening:
In Mr. Johnsons response, he
wrote that the records you
request include session law
174, Oregon Laws 1911.
This factually in error. I wanted
only one law, a session law
in which the Oregon Legislature
expressly stated it intent to
amend the Motor Vehicle
laws of Oregon, recorded in
the session of 1911, Chapter
174, wherein the subject
class is described in the frst
sentence as driver for hire, to
subsequently include members
of the general public, as that
term is used at ORS 801.305.
This is too critical an issue to be
misquoted, even in the details.
I am not asking Mr. Johnson
to reiterate verbatim the
demand to which he
responded. However, those
who need to know, must have
an accurate rendering of the
exchange. It would suffce
if Mr. Johnson would return a
copy of the demand he received
from you with the RECEIVED
stamp of Legislative Counsel
on it.
A second problem is refected
in Mr. Johnsons conclusion that
the demanded record(s)
probably do not exist anywhere.
I appreciate that Mr. Johnsons
response included language I
specifcally asked for (does not
exist), but Mr. Johnson is not
paid to speculate on issues like
this, as he appears to do, by
using the term probably:, he
is paid to know. Also, the word
anywhere appears to be
extraneous, and only detracts
from the core issue: The
Oregon Legislative Assembly
has never enacted a law
making the public, who have
the right to use the highway for
vehicles, subject, at the same
time, to licensing. For fnality
on this issue, I should not have
to demand the enactment
wherein the legislature gave
the public the right to use the
highway for vehicles. The
legislatures guide to common
English usage says highways
have been recognized as open
to public use as a matter of
right for about 1,000 years
of English history (Websters
New International, 1960). The
2007 Legislative Assembly
reaffrmed that right by a vote
of 55 to 3 in the House on May
1st and a unanimous vote of
the Senate on June 1st.
Mr. Johnson should be
willing to reissue his response
with the words probably
and anywhere deleted, or
he should be able to explain
why they are essential to his
response to my demand.
Heres a big problem: Mr.
Johnsons letter accurately
refects the fact that Legislative
Administration Committee
Administrator, Davis Henderson,
sent threatening letters to me
in 2005 and 2007. The 2007
letter said that because I have
been seeking information, I
was banned through the end
of the 74th Legislative Session
from calling or visiting the state
capitol. According to that letter,
even though I admit to seeking
information, the ban has long
since ended. Could you ask
Mr. Johnson to explain his
variations on Mr. Hendersons
theme.
There is a rumor that
somehow a Circuit Court Judge
was recently infuenced by an
anonymous entity to extra-
judicially reinstate the ban,
even though the only contact
I have had recently with the
capitol was to call Senator
Courtneys Offce in May to ask
if he knew that his LAC staff
person, Mr. Henderson, had
banned me from my capitol
(I sought Senator Courtneys
input because Mr. Henderson
apparently felt it necessary
to conceal his act of banning
me from another legislator
who inquired. Were still not
sure whether Dave Henderson
concealed this from his
immediate supervisor, Senator
Courtney).
My concern: Ive been
seeking the truth about a law
we now know probably does
not exist anywhere, yet has
been a cash cow for certain
state bureaucracies and
corporate cronies for decades,
to the injury of a free peoples
fundamental right to travel
[without a commercial license] ,
and Im currently being tried as
a criminal for doing so! Thank
Mr. Johnson for reminding me.
Sincerely ; Richard L. Koenig

EDITOR COMMENT; Words in

brackets [ ] above are those
of the editor! If the Declaration
of Independence guarantees
YOUR RIGHT to Life, Liberty and
the Pursuit of Happiness as one
of the people (in a sovereign
capacity) then would it not
make sense that Oregon State
Corporation could only create a
CODE OF STATUTES to regulate
commerce and business only,
i.e., Motor Vehicle Code; for the
regulation, taxing and licensing
of commercial vehicles upon
the highways hauling people
or freight for hire, in a trade,
occupation or profession.
These and other issues will be
covered in future issues.
18 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
S
omeone at NASA released
a photo that they shouldn't
have, a picture of a piece of
timber the size of a railroad
tie, a photo that could get
someone killed. There is no
mistaking that the object in
the print below is a piece of
wood. NASA claims that Mars
is a desert planet with no life
at all. NASA lies, repeatedly.
Where would a piece of
timber this size come from?
There are vast forests on Mars,
ones that are kept from the
public. This piece of wood looks
like it foated to its present
location, being partially sunk in
the soil. The ground around it
is very interesting. Notice the
fat rock formation of the soil
and the crevices in between
them. Does this look familiar?
It appears to be the bed of
a dried up pond. There had
to be a signifcant amount of
water in this area, water high
enough to lift that railroad tie
sized piece of timber and foat
is perhaps several miles. The
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
showed that vast regions of
the Red Planet have been
altered by foods. This dried
pond effect should come as no
surprise.
This food had to have
happened within the past
thirty or forty years because
the wood is intact, though this
is judging the rate of decay by
Earth standards. Some may
say that Mars did have water
on it long ago and that it even
had an atmosphere, which is
true, but a piece of timber isn't
going to survive for thousands
of years.
Both of the Viking Orbiters
flmed vast forests on Mars,
though no subsequent probe
to the Red Planet has shot a
single frame of flm showing
a tree. This was by design.
The Viking photographs show
more than just a few trees
but rather thousands upon
thousand of them. These trees
appear to be much larger than
NASA Mars photo leaked. . .
- Wood, Water and Trees found on MARS!
Earth trees, having a leaf and
branch system that is unique
to Mars. The foliage spans
much wider than a similar
plants on Earth do, rising to
who knows what heights. The
spacing between them could
be the result of the dying
Martian atmosphere. Dense
forests more than likely flled
large areas of Mars back in the
days when it had a breathable
environment. There were
undoubtedly several species of
trees, and different varieties
of underbrush, which are now
extinct.
The Flood destroyed the
Garden of Eden and other
ancient worlds that God wanted
destroyed such as Atlantis. The
Ancient Egyptians spoke of a
time that existed before Egypt.
The Sphinx clearly shows signs
of water erosion, which shows
that it existed before the
Flood and well before modern
archeologists claim that it did.
The same wiping out strategy
was applied to worlds beyond
the Earth. Mars has an ancient
world that was destroyed, one
with a face and a pyramid. So
it isn't so hard to believe that
the moon did as well.
Many claim that the moon
isn't a moon at all but an alien
object that was placed in Earth
orbit. Some have called it Luna.
They claim that the moon
was not mentioned in the
Biblical story of creation, but it
was. The moon was referred to
as "the lesser light that rules
the night" in Genesis 1:16.
The moon stopped in the sky
in Joshua 10:30 but this had
nothing to do with the alien
presence there.
The aliens live on the surface
of the moon, but this is in no
way saying that there isn't an
alien presence inside the moon
as well. If you take some time
to use your photo editor with
high-resolution photos of the
moon, it won't take you long
to fnd these structures. NASA
will suggest that you created
this or that it is really part of
a crater. Stop and ask yourself
one question, if the moon
really is as NASA claims that it
is, then why are some photos
classifed and unavailable to
the public while others are
inked and blurred?
One of the most famous
examples of this is the Apollo
16 "Earth rise" photo in which
"the Earth" is rising over the
moon. NASA says that the
object in the picture is the
Earth and few people question
it. If you think for yourself,
and look with an open mind,
you will clearly see that this is
a UFO. This is another craft off
to the left, which NASA doesn't
even attempt to explain away.
The fact that trees can
survive in such an atmosphere,
and with much less water than
Earth trees do, reveals their
unique structure
while offering hope
for an increasingly
polluted Earth.
Since the Martian
atmosphere is 95%
carbon dioxide,
these plants would
have to thrive on
it in a way much
superior to Earth
trees. They may give
off oxygen, though I
am using terrestrial
vegetation for
comparison, but
they could give
off another gas,
one even toxic to
humans. Seeding or
drafting these trees
in bulk could bring
breathable air back
to the Red Planet. If
Mars was so altered
by water, then where
did all that water
go? Some of it went
into the soil, much
of it is frozen at the
poles, and a good percentage
of it went into a lake. NASA
didn't need to spend all that
money on the Phoenix Mission
in order to search for water on
Mars. All they had to do was
look at their old photographs.
The only way that piece of
timber got to where it was is
by way of food, and the only
way that it separated from the
tree that it was once a part of
was by high and rapidly fowing
water. Based on the fndings
of the Mars Reconnaissance
Orbiter, that piece of wood
could've foated for some
distance before coming to its
fnal resting place.
The lake, although frozen,
Mars having a mean surface
temperature of -46 degrees C,
must contain more than just
water. There has to be some
amebas and other single celled
organisms in these waters.
There are most likely fossils of
Martian fsh and perhaps even
Martian animals. On Earth, old
lake beds are a prime location
in which to fnd dinosaur
fossils. Why would Mars be
any different?
If you examine the lake
carefully, especially toward the
right angle, you will notice two
indentations. One is large and
shallow while the other one,
which is located near the right
edge of the lake, is small but
much deeper. These are due to
the lake shifting as the result
of temperature fuctuations.
NASA can keep telling its
lies but the photos have
slipped out and what a story
they tell. NASA thought that
the Opportunity Rover took a
picture of the area in front of
it, but did they honestly expect
us to forget about the railroad
sized piece of timber in the
foreground? It's time for NASA
to come clean with the public.
It's time that they land one of
those rovers in Cydonia, the
Inca city, or in one of forests.
WASHINGTON (AFP) For
anyone with an interest in the
starry skies and around 42 million
dollars to spare, NASA may have
an interesting proposition.
The US space agency has
announced it is selling three used
space shuttles when they are
retired in 2010, after 30 years of
service.
Sadly for enthusiasts planning
their own voyage of discovery,
the orbiters will only be made
available for display in museums
and other educational institutes.
And potential buyers may have
to move quickly.
One of the three craft -- the
most complex aircraft ever built
which launches into space like a
rocket before gliding back to Earth
like a plane -- has already been
earmarked for the Smithsonian's
National Air and Space Museum in
Washington.
There the shuttle will join a
wealth of exhibits held by the
museum which mark the history
of fight and space exploration,
including a frst successful
motorized plane produced by the
Wright brothers in 1903.
The two remaining craft, which
were generally used to transport
equipment into space, will be
cleaned, decontaminated and
stored in the Kennedy Space
Center in Florida while new homes
are found.
The 42-million dollar cost
Editor comment; why
wouldnt NSA lie? When has
the federal government ever
told the truth on any important
matter that involved the
people?
NASA camera captured the image of this timber partially sunken
in the Martian soil.
Image sources:
The high resolution picture, which this might have come from is at:
h t t p : / / ma r s r o v e r s . j p l . n a s a . g o v / g a l l e r y / p r e s s /
opportunity/20040524a/site_B115_navcam_180_cyl_L-B118R1.jpg

NASA seeks buyers

for three shuttles
includes six million dollars to
fy the shuttle to its new home
piggybacked on a special Boeing
747, but not the costs of the fnal
road transport.
For those with a smaller budget,
NASA is also selling engines found
at the rear of the shuttles and
which run on a mixture of liquid
hydrogen and liquid oxygen. They
will cost around 400,000-800,000
dollars each, not including
delivery.
Only six space shuttles
were ever built. The prototype
Enterprise never few in space.
Two were destroyed.
Challenger exploded 73
seconds after its lift-off in 1986
killing seven astronauts on
board. Columbia disintegrated
as it returned to the Earth's
atmosphere in 2003 also with
seven astronauts on board.
Only three shuttles remain
-- Discovery, Atlantis and
Endeavour. They are due to
make eight more fights to the
ISS to fnish construction and
carry out the last maintenance
mission on the Hubble.
According to the British daily
The Guardian, the Science
Museum in London has voiced
interest in buying Endeavour,
but reportedly only American
organizations are being
considered.

Editor comment; Why wasn't this shown on national television

by your government via NASA on 60 Minutes? Because they
didn't want you to know!
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 19
T
exas is a North American
sovereign Nation
standing under Gods law
that is alive and surviving after
being fraudulently placed in a
dormant state on or about 163
years ago and was released
from said dormancy in
September 2005. The republic
of Texas Nation was brought
out of dormancy by a National
Texian Peoples ballot election
for the reconstituting of their
Constitutional Texas republic
Government in compliance
with the 1836 organic republic
of Texas Constitution as
amended and accepted by
the Texian People and for the
Texian People.
How It Started
It started with an unlawful
annexation by resolution from
the US Congress after a Treaty
of Annexation was voted down
three to one by the US Senate
in 1844. There is no provision
in the U.S. Constitution that
allows its Congress any
authority for annexing a foreign
nation, which the Constitutional
Texas republic is and was
at that time. To accomplish
annexation, the U.S. House
and Senate passed an unlawful
joint resolution using color of
law. There was not a quorum
present to vote on the matter,
so it was passed unlawfully.
Further, only the US Senate
by a two-thirds majority vote
can pass an annexation treaty,
and their annexation authority
is limited to territories, and
therefore, does not extend to
nations. Through this fraud, the
Constitutional republic of Texas
Nation in 1845 was placed in
dormancy and The State of
Texas was unlawfully created,
by color of law trickery.
Re-claiming Sovereignty
The government of the
Texas republic Nation has now
lawfully been vested back
into the hands of the people
of Texas as a Constitutional
republic Nation. This process is
not an act of seceding from the
U.S. since history shows that
citizens of the Constitutional
Texas republic never voted
to cede their land in the frst
place.
More Information
The Constitutional republic of
Texas has a home page on the
Internet at www.texasrepublic.
info. Much information, as
well as e-mail addresses, are
provided there. You may also
keep in touch with current
meetings and events by
emailing the Constitutional
Senator District # 5 at
trep777@dctexas.net.
A NATION STANDING UNDER GOD IS RE-BORN
The constitutional republic of Texas Nation 1836-2008
The Next Step
The legal steps have been
taken. The framework is in
place. Now we can proudly stand
upon principle, not because it
is popular
or easy, but
because it
is the right
thing to do.
Why would
we continue
to support
Fraud? It
is time to
declare our rights to live as
free individuals and claim the
freedoms of life in a republic.
Unlike democracy where 51%
of the people can enslave the
other 49%, in a republic neither
the people nor the government
can vote away the rights of a
Citizen. In the Texas republic
a higher authority than man
grants these rights.
Freedom For All Texian
Inhabitants
The Constitutional republic
of Texas is not, cannot and
will not become a corporate
member of the United Nations
or a so-called One World
Government. It is a Neutral
Nation among the Nations
being of Gods World, where
its People will enjoy Freedom
from oppressive government,
Freedom from direct taxes,
Freedom of allodial land
ownership, Freedom of Travel
without toll roads, Freedom of
education, Freedom
to own and run a
personal business
without fees,
regulations, statutes
or codes, Freedom
to defend family and
property without
being arrested,
Freedom of speech,
and Freedom to
exercise their God
Given Rights.
Texians Right To
Independence As A Nation
Under Gods Law Maintained
Through Texas Common
Law
For understanding what
rights the People have claiming
to be in their offcial national
name, Texians have to exist
and to operate as a free and
independent nation. There
are two separate felds of
study one must address to
comprehend its basis in fact.
First is history and second is
mans international law, or
what is termed in its organic
source as Gods law of nations.
Neither feld of law addresses
the total question, nor answers
it.
The Unlawful Fraud
Let us begin this quest for
understanding by revealing the
facts of the history and the law
so that you can make your own
judgment on the question.
On March 2, 1836, while in
the middle of a war for its
independence, the Texians
boldly declared their
independence from Mexico,
which itself several years
before had declared itself
independent from Spain.
The Texian movement,
which had begun formally on
November 13,
1835, assembled
and adopted
the formation
of a provisional
g o v e r n me n t .
Texians were
at war to free
them selves
from a tyrannical
government, but
there are also
historical records
to show that there was another
agenda directed towards
eventually bringing Texas
into a union with the United
States. After the fall of the
Alamo, delegates in convention
adopted a constitution for the
new nation of Texas, known as
the republic of Texas, on March
17, 1836. On May 14, 1836,
by secret agreement in the
Treaty of Velasco with Mexicos
General Santa Anna, Texas
became a free and sovereign
nation. On April
25, 1838, the
United States of
America entered
into a formal
treaty, which was
declared ratifed
on October 13,
1838. This treaty
recognized the
full boundaries
of the
Consti tuti onal
republic of Texas that were
also agreed to by the Adams-
onis Treaty in 1819 between
the united States of America
and the Nation of Spain, which
encompassed approximately
393,000 square miles of land
and included parts of the present
corporate states of Oklahoma,
New Mexico, Kansas, Colorado,
and Wyoming.
The Congressional Records
of both the Congress of the
United States and Congress of
the republic of Texas, between
1837 and 1845, show that there
had been several attempts to
bring Texas into a union with the
United States; but due to the
aggressive stances of several
senators and congressmen,
such as John Quincy Adams,
they were able to prove on the
U.S. Congressional Record that
it would be unconstitutional for
the United States to annex
the Texas Nation or any other
foreign nation without proper
ratifcation of an amendment
to the Constitution to allow
for such annexation. But on
February 27, 1845, the Senate
of the United States usurped
its authority under the U.S.
Constitution and started the
unlawful process to annex
Texas a foreign Nation. This
usurpation of authority lacked
any lawful foundation under
International Law, Law of
Nations and the United States
Constitution. The U.S. senate
was unable to muster enough
votes to pass an unlawful
treaty; so they proceeded to
unlawfully annex the Texas
Nation with a so-called joint
resolution. There is a big
difference between a Treaty
and a Resolution. There has
never been a lawful Treaty
of Annexation between the
united States of America and
the republic of Texas. The
records of these congressional
proceedings during 1845 and
early 1846 are quite explicit,
with documented facts showing
the unlawful annexation.
Although historians argue that
the people of Texas voted for
the annexation, they refuse to
explain why the Constitution of
the United States was violated
by the lack of an amendment
and ratifcation by the states
then in the union. The records
clearly show that the people
of the United States would
not have voted in support of
Texas Annexation and that
Texas Annexation was strictly
a ploy to facilitate United
States' invasion
of Mexico in order
to gain Pacifc
Ocean seaports
in California
for certain
i n t e r n a t i o n a l
i n t e r e s t s
propagated by the
United States.
S o m e
historians will
argue that since
the People of Texas voted on
this subject, and due to the long
passage of time, the question
is settled. Enter now the twist
of history and international law
that no one offcially wants to
face, and everyone is trying
to ignore. Mans time cannot
cure actions of un-lawfulness
or fraud. Only God can forgive
them.
As part of the unlawful
Annexation Resolution of 1845,
The People of the republic
of Texas were tricked into
adopting a new constitution
on December 29, 1845,
but no matter how much is
researched from that date
after 1845 or how much time
has passed, Fraud is Fraud*,
and all matters regarding the
Corporatism, THE STATE OF
TEXAS and parts of THE STATE
OF NEW MEXICO, THE STATE
OF COLORADO, THE STATE
OF WYOMING, THE STATE
OF KANSAS, and THE STATE
OF OKLAHOMA are null and
void since 1845 when the
10th Congress was forced
into abeyance and dormancy
un-lawfully, until its re-birth
in the Year of our Lord 2005
(160 years past). *As a Maxim
of Law, fraud vitiates any
agreement or contract ab initio
(from the beginning).
Texians Reclaimed Their
Rights
The right of those claiming
status as Texian Nationals
to reform their nation is a
reserved right given by God
the almighty creator. It now
has been reinstated and there
is no court in the world that has
lawful jurisdiction to decide this
political issue. The hard facts
are that the Constitutional
republic of Texas Political Body
assembled as the re-elected
10th Congress in September
of 2005.
Whereas, the people, replaced
the elected treasonous 1845
10th Congress members who
violated their Oaths of Offce,
abandoned their offces, and
abdicated their responsibilities
with dishonor by not convening
the 10th congress legislative
session, thereby placing the
Constitutional "Congress of
the republic of Texas" into
abeyance or dormancy.
After being brought forward in
2005 from the forced abeyance
of 1845 by an unlawful
Resolution falsely portrayed as
a so-called treaty that never
was, the Nation of Texas, with
its Constitutional "Congress
of the republic of Texas," is
presently conducting business
under Gods law and the
organic 1836 Constitution as
amended in September 2007.
It has now entered into its 4th
session as the Constitutional
republic of Texas so named the
13th elected Congress for the
Years of our Lord 2008-2009.
The Texians Demand: Let
us go in peace
We Texians, native-born
and adoptive, simply want to
reclaim our Texas heritage.
With respect to Texas, the
Corporatism United States has
violated its own Constitution
by not providing Texas
with a republican Form of
Government, and has unlawfully
compelled the Texian People
to participate in its fatally
fawed wars, economics, social
security, welfare, immigration
programs, and its democracy
(which was eschewed by the
Founding Fathers). It has
unlawfully hypothecated Texas
land to THE STATE OF TEXAS,
and parts of THE STATE OF
NEW MEXICO, THE STATE OF
COLORADO, THE STATE OF
WYOMING, THE STATE OF
KANSAS, and THE STATE OF
OKLAHOMA.
The Texian People acting
through their body politic, the
organic Constitutional Texas
republic is reestablishing its
true and lawful standing as an
independent sovereign nation.
Peaceful and lawful recognition
by the United States will
allow Texas to become the
republican nation where the
main duty of the government
is the protection of the Peoples'
Rights, Freedom, and Property;
where the government
recognizes that the People
are the Sovereigns, and the
government the servants;
where private personal Religion
and Economics are areas that
the government dare not
enter; and where the People
understand what the true role
of government is, as well as
understand the true nature of
government.
The early Texian pioneers
and settlers understood and
appreciated the Promise of
a Nation operating under a
Constitutional republic form
of government, using only
Gold and Silver as tender of
payment of debts, embracing
the common-law developed
over the centuries to protect
and secure the rights of man,
providing man the ability to
own land and property in
allodium, guaranteeing that
man will enjoy the fruits of
his labor without being taxed
for the right to earn a living,
and providing food, shelter,
and the pursuit of happiness
for one's family. They saw
an opportunity in Texas that
wasn't available in the United
States and headed for Texas.
They were up against the
harsh Texas land, an imperious
government, and seemingly
insurmountable odds taking on
an Army thirty times their size
at the Alamo, and then fnally
being victorious in battle and
negotiations to win the war
and the land, for the people
forever.
That is what being a "Texian"
means. If you are of like mind
we invite you to join us. Our
Nation is being reclaimed one
living soul at a time. The
time is now! We have all the
documentation supporting
Texas as a legitimate, lawful,
sovereign and independent
nation that has come out of
abeyance to take its lawful
place among the nations of
this planet.
Written by republic of Texas
Dist. #5 Senator Ed Brannum
with much appreciated help
from others. trep777@dctexas.
net
Visit us at; http://www.
texasrepublic.info
Help us return the land of Texas
back to the Texian people.
Donations: Pay to the order
of:: republic of Texas.
Please Mail or send by carrier
to.
Texas republic Trustee
c/o 1105 Lawndale Ave.
Victoria, Texas republic
near [77901].
The Republic of Texas
National Standard fag
God's Texian Country
A Constitutional Nation
The Republic of Texas
Admiralty Flag
20 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN

VITAL LINK FOR ALL HOMEOWNERS

www.StopEveryForeclosure.org
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
When communicating with the Bulletin please include your name, EMAIL
address, and phone number with all correspondence. All monies recieved
from past issues of older prices will be pro-rated at the current subscription
rate and time.
Thank You.



PATRIOT PUBLICATIONS
www.Maine-Patriot.com
SUPPORT
THE FREE
PRESS
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 21
OREGON APPEALS COURT DEALS MAJOR BLOW
TO GUN RIGHTS IN OREGON
A
n Oregon Appeals Court
decision has found that
your car is now considered
a "public place." That means
that possessing a loaded fire-
arm in a vehicle may be con-
sidered a crime if the locality
in which you are traveling has
a ban on open loaded carry.
This ruling is bizarre in light
of how Oregon law defnes
"public place." ORS 161.015
defnes public place this way:
(10) Public place means a
place to which the general
public has access and
includes, but is not limited to,
hallways, lobbies and other
parts of apartment houses
and hotels not constituting
rooms or apartments designed
for actual residence, and
highways, streets, schools,
places of amusement, parks,
playgrounds and premises
used in connection with public
passenger transportation.
The case, Bryan Ward VS
State of Oregon, dealt with
an arrest, by a Portland Police
offcer, of a person who had an
unconcealed handgun in his
car.
It has always been our
position that open carry in a
vehicle was clearly protected
by Oregon law. ORS 166.250
clearly states that except for
CHL holders, it is concealed
carry in a vehicle that is
prohibited. It further states
that the prohibition against
concealed, loaded carry in
a vehicle does not apply to
"a recreational vessel or
recreational vehicle while
used, for whatever period of
time, as residential quarters."
It has always been our
position that open carry in a
vehicle was clearly protected
by Oregon law. ORS 166.250
clearly states that except for
CHL holders, it is concealed
carry in a vehicle that is
prohibited. It further states
that the prohibition against
concealed, loaded carry in
a vehicle does not apply to
"a recreational vessel or
recreational vehicle while
used, for whatever period of
time, as residential quarters."
The Appeals Court decision
turns on its head Oregon's
preemption statute which
allows only the state legislature
to regulate possession of
frearms, except for loaded
carry in public places. If your
car is now considered a "public
place" will a law enforcement
offcer need a warrant to
search it?
The Court concludes "When
read together, ORS 166.173
and 161.015(1) clearly allow
local governments to regulate
the possession of loaded
frearms on their streets and
highways."
But ORS 166.173
states"166.173 Authority of
city or county to regulate
possession of loaded frearms
in public places. (1) A city or
county may adopt ordinances
to regulate, restrict or prohibit
the possession of loaded
frearms in public places as
defned in ORS 161.015." and
161.015, as noted above,
clearly defnes a "public place"
as a place to which the general
public has access. "It is not
ambiguous in any way.
The Court also reaches
conclusions that seem to have
no bearing on this case at all.
In their decision, they state
the following :
"Moreover, ORS 166.173(2)
(c)--which exempts persons
licensed to carry concealed
weapons from local loaded
frearms regulations--
demonstrates that the
legislature anticipated
situations in which persons
may possess concealed,
loaded frearms in a public
place. The legislature chose
to exempt such persons from
local regulations based on
their possession of a certain
type of permit, despite the
fact that a concealed frearm,
although otherwise in a "public
place," is not kept in a place to
which the "general public has
access."
But this case is not about
concealed handguns. CHL
holders are exempt from
many restrictions that non-
license holders are subject to,
and the legislature made very
specifc rules about vehicles
and frearms possession which
clearly allow open carry without
a license while in a car. If a car is
a "public place" then why even
have laws specifcally dealing
with possession in a vehicle
when the limits on carrying in
"public places" would apply to
cars anyway?
Oregon's preemption law
was created specifcally
to prevent a person from
inadvertently breaking the law
as he moved around the state.
This ruling is a major setback
for gun rights in Oregon and
puts many people at risk
simply by crossing into a
town or city that has onerous
and unposted rules. OFF is
considering what further legal
action can be taken, and in the
meantime warns gun owners to
be very careful when traveling
in Oregon.
Editor comment; are we
to presume since the State
owns your vehicle, then the
State corporation can say
that inside of our property
is Public Property. Makes
sense! However, if one has,
as creditor, accepted for value
the vehicle and returned the
registration, license plates,
driver license, fled a lien on
their automobile and placed
a private fag in place of the
state plate can the interior of
a private automobile (private
property) be deemed public
property? The anti-American
position is to limit, restrict and/
or bar the people from their
guns and their right to carry.
In Kennesaw, Georgia, (1982)
passed an ordinance that the
people could carry gun(s) and
keep a loaded gun at home
and the crime rate dropped
almost overnight! As the Police
Chief Mike Saine then said;
Our citizens are armed and
vigilant. This place is just too
dangerous for criminals. I
guess thats not the objective
here in Oregon, not to reduce
crime, but TAKE THE GUNS
AWAY ANYWAY THEY CAN! I
hope there are many law suits
and/or tort claims! Mine may
be coming!

Are we at last brought to such

a humiliating and debasing
degradation, that we cannot be
trusted with arms for our own
defence? Where is the difference
between having our arms in
our own possession and under
our own direction, and having
them under the management of
Congress? If our defence be the
*real* object of having those
arms, in whose hands can they be
trusted with more propriety, or
equal safety to us, as in our own
hands?
-- Patrick Henry,
speech of June 9 1788
Let us hope our weapons are
never needed --but do not forget
what the common people knew
when they demanded the Bill of
Rights: An armed citizenry is the
frst defense, the best defense, and
the fnal defense against tyranny.
If guns are outlawed, only the
government will have guns. Only
the police, the secret police, the
military, the hired servants of our
rulers. Only the government --
and a few outlaws. I intend to be
among the outlaws."
-- Edward Abbey,
"Abbey's Road", 1979
22 - January / February 2009 THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
HISTORY
Continued From Page 12
one day, the Rothschild fortune
grew by one million pounds.
They literally bought control
of England for a few cents on
the dollar. The same way the
Rockefeller's went into Japan
after World War 2 and bought
everything 10 cents on the
dollar. SONY=Standard Oil New
York, a Rockefeller Company.
Frederick Morton wrote in his
book, The Rothschilds:
"...the wealth of the
Rothschilds consists of the
bankruptcy of nations."
There were other wealthy
families in Europe and America
which were allowed to join "the
international banking club"
such as John D. Rockefeller
and John Pierpont Morgan.
Early American Wisdom
The Americans had won their
political independence but their
fnancial independence was in
jeopardy. The international
bankers had an agent in place
and his name was Alexander
Hamilton who wanted a central
bank. Thomas Jefferson
lobbied vehemently against
the central bank stating it was
contrary to the
Constitution.
However, a
central bank
was formed in
1781 known
as the Bank of
North America
which was
p a t t e r n e d
after the Bank
of England.
The colonists
w a n t e d
n o t h i n g
to do with
it so it folded in 1790.
The international bankers
countered the closing of the
Bank of North America by
gaining a charter for the Bank
of the United States which
was chartered on February
25, 1791. The Bank of France
desired the formation of the US
Bank also and it was chartered
for 20 years.
In 1826, the second bank's
charter was soon to expire and
presidential candidate Andrew
Jackson campaigned strongly
against a central bank which
was owned and operated by
the international banking
element. Here is Jackson's
opinion of those bankers:
"You are a den of vipers. I
intend to wipe you out, and by
the Eternal God I will rout you
out...If people only understood
the rank injustice of the
money and banking system,
there would be a revolution by
morning."
In 1836, the charter did expire
but that was not the end of the
international banking infuence
in this country. The Civil War
was planned in England as far
back as 1809. Slavery was not
the real cause of the Civil War.
The Rothschilds (who were
heavy into the slave trade)
used the slavery issue as "a
divide and conquer strategy"
which almost split the United
States in two.
The Bank of England
fnanced the North while the
Paris branch of the Rothschild
bank funded the South. In
1863, the National Banking
Act was passed despite protest
by President Lincoln. This act
allowed a private corporation
the authority to issue our
money.
Enter 1913
In November of 1910,
some of these vultures came
together at the Jekyl Island
Hunt Club on Jekyl Island,
Georgia. What were they
hunting? The biggest prize of
all, the absolute and complete
control of all the money in
America which means control
of all America and with it the
power to make slaves of all the
people.
Those who attended were:
Senator Nelson Aldrich
(Nelson Rockefeller's maternal
grandfather); A. Piatt Andrew,
Economist and Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury;
Frank Vanderlip, President
of the National City Bank of
New York; Henry P. Norton,
President of Morgan's First
National Bank of New York;
Paul Moritz Warburg, a German
who was partner in the New
York banking house of Kuhn,
Loeb Co.; Benjamin Strong,
an aid to J. P. Morgan. Paul
Warburg was credited as the
architect of the bill which was
passed by Congress and signed
by traitorous Woodrow Wilson.
It was entitled the Federal
Reserve Act of 1913. America
once again had a central bank
but this time they had placed
America under an absolute
dictatorship. President James
Garfeld had insight into this
situation:
"It must be realized that
whoever controls the volume
of money in any country
is absolutely master of all
industry commerce."
The Federal
Reserve was
incorporated in
1914 and has
been creating
a completely
unnecessar y
national debt
ever since. In
simple terms,
the Fed creates
money as debt.
They create
money out
of thin air by
nothing more than a book
entry. Whenever the members
of the Fed make any loans,
that debt money is our money
supply.
The United States went
bankrupt in 1938 [declared in
1933] because of this system.
It took the Fed only 25 years
to bankrupt the USA. Can
you imagine how little time
it would take these vultures
to bankrupt a developing
nation? The American people
are paying about $300 billion
dollars a year in interest to
this phony organization. When
you look in the Washington,
D.C. phone book, you will not
fnd the Federal Reserve in the
Government section as they
are a private concern.
The national debt is increased
about $1.71 billion dollars
every day (as of October 12,
2004) . Have you taken a
look at your money? It says
"Federal Reserve Note" which
means it is an instrument of
debt. There is no real money
in circulation.
The Assassination of
President Kennedy
One of the greatest cover-
ups in history was the Killing
of the President. If you believe
the Mafa did it, then I have
ocean front land in Kansas for
you to buy. President Kennedy
was murdered over money, $4
billion dollars worth. You see,
he had printed $4 billion worth
of non-interest bearing money
which meant he began to chop
at the profts of the vultures.
Interest free money means the
national debt is eliminated and
the power of the international
banking element is broken.
So to prevent Kennedy from
abolishing the illegal Fed, he
was assassinated. Coincidence?
As soon as the traitor Johnson
was in offce, he recalled all the
debt free notes and continued
our country in the same path
of ruin. There, the mystery of
the killing is over. Just follow
the trail of the money.
War
Now that the Federal Reserve
was frmly in place, schemes
had to be constructed to get
the government to borrow so a
continuously growing national
debt would happen. So here
are some coincidences: The
Federal Reserve is created
in 1913, then in 1914 we
have World War 1. Right at
the end of World War 1, we
have a depressed economy
especially in the Weimar
Republic where 2 billion marks
could buy a loaf of bread. In
1917, we had the Bolshevik
revolution in Russia. A man
named Lord Alfred Milner was
a front man and paymaster for
the Rothschilds in Petrograd
during the revolution. He later
headed a secret organization
called The Round Table which
was dedicated to a one world
government run by wealthy
fnanciers under socialism.
Then, lo and behold, in the
1920's we see a little known
corporal with 12 men meeting
in a beer hall in Munich while
in America the Roaring 20's
were in progress until October,
1929. Then the Federal
Reserve withheld money from
circulation so bills could not be
paid, while simultaneously they
were calling in all their loans
which caused the stock market
to crash. By 1932 the price of
stocks had plummeted 80%.
When the bankers plunged this
nation into a depression on
that fateful day in October, at
the New York Stock Exchange
was a visitor, his name was
Winston Churchill who stated
after the crash of '29, "Now
I know who wields the real
power."
Then we come into the 1930's
and the rise of Hitler. Hitler
was also funded by Wall Street
through the Industrialist I.G.
Farben. Let's test the theory
of follow the money. Here is a
little known corporal with no
money meeting in a beer hall
in Munich with only about 12
men. In a seriously depressed
and defeated country, there
begins to rise another military
dictatorship.
By 1934 the Nuremberg
Rallies were in place and
Germany was rebuilt. In that
countries' economy who had
that much money to rebuild
Germany into a powerful
country which marched across
Europe and almost defeated
Russia in the frst 24 hours
of Case White (The invasion
of Russia)? The answer is
the bankers of the USA and
England. In fact, a banker
named Bernard Baruch was
President Roosevelt's personal
advisor during World War 2.
Baruch made $200 million
dollars as a result of World War
2. During WW2 the Rockefellers
were selling oil to the Germans
from their Standard Oil concern
in Argentina.
The Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) was formed
in 1919 in Paris, France by
Colonel Edward Mandell House
who was known as Woodrow
Wilson's alter ego. The CFR
was and still is dedicated to
the one world rule under a new
world order. In fact, every war
has been planned by the CFR.
Every American President since
1919 has had their cabinet
flled with CFR members. Also
our traitorous Presidents fll
their cabinets with not only
CFR members but those of
the Trilateral Commission,
the Bilderbergers, the Yale
Fraternity of the Skull and
Bones (George Bush was a
member of this).
These members insure that
the will of the bankers are
done, even if the President is
not a member of any group.
After WW2, was fought another
war was created known as the
Korean War (which was started
by a phone call from John Foster
Dulles), then the Vietnam War.
During the Vietnamese War,
the Rockefellers had a metals
processing plant going full
blast in North Vietnam. The
Rockefellers have the blood
of thousands of Americans on
their hands because of their
supplying the Russians with
weapons and metals. The
North Vietnamese received
their weapons from Russia.
The only reason these rats
are never indicted for treason,
is because since WW2 there
has never been a declared
war which means if we have
no offcial enemy, there can
be no aiding the enemy AKA
treason.
Presently we have skirmishes
such as the Gulf War of 1990
which was an experiment by
the New World Order crowd to
see how fast they can assemble
an army in case a country does
not choose to obey the dictates
of the banker bosses. Of course
funding for the gulf war came
from borrowing money from
the Fed. Wherever you hear of
a limited war, or some type of
political destabilization, think
of the money trail. Wars are
started in foreign countries,
then our President goes there
and gives millions of dollars
of borrowed money which
normally goes into the pockets
of the dictators. Nowhere in our
Constitution is it written that
our government is to borrow
money and give it away.
Final Thoughts
The American economy has
been sucked dry by the Federal
Reserve System. Americans
think they own property but
the truth is the entire United
States has been mortgaged to
the bankers. The Rothschilds
and Rockefellers become
richer while the peoples of
the world become poorer. The
International Monetary Fund
and the World Bank are also
designed to loan money to
developing nations with the
understanding that they will
never be able to repay so with
every loan made to a country,
it becomes their death knell.
The entire world has been
plunged into a debt economy
which means 6 billion people
are in debt to about 250 men.
But keep in mind that all their
wealth is phony because it is
created money without any
gold backing.
I really laugh when Wall Street
bows down to Alan Greenspan
who is nothing more than a
boot licker of the International
Banking element who takes
his orders by phone too. So
many people rejoice when the
Federal Reserve has a policy
meeting and no interest rate
increase happens. The truth is
that we should never have a
Federal Reserve to begin with.
They print money, loan it into
circulation, and the American
people are strapped with more
debt.
I remember leaving materials
on the Federal Reserve at a
meeting of Concerned Women
for America. The next day I
went back and not one copy
was taken. The reason given
me was because it was not
approved material. Groups
like Concerned Women for
America and the Christian
Coalition and Rush Limbaugh
are something known as
controlled opposition.
They are allowed to exist as
long as they do not bring up
the real issues. If they stick to
the created liberal Democrat
Vs. conservative Republican
agenda, they can exist and
the bankers will even make
them famous. But you will
never hear a Beverly LaHaye,
Tim LaHaye, Jim Dobson, Billy
Graham, Gary Bauer, or any
other famous Christians ever
tackle the real issues like the
illegal Fed which causes all the
poverty in every country.
If these people would think
for a minute that if $350 billion
dollars a year was not being
sucked out of the economy and
was used for the people in this
country, we would surely have
enough to help other nations
and our own problems. Crime
would almost be non-existent
with a monetized money
system.
The Great Commission
would also be funded without
worrying if there will be enough
left over to feed the children.
THE TEN MEMBER BANKS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
All owned by the Rothschilds:
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of
Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of
New York

Now ask a question - Where
is the Federal Government of
the United States listed and
how much does it get? I will
answer it for you, it is not listed
because the Federal Reserve
is private and it receives
nothing.
see: http://www.scionofzion.
com/federalreserve.htm

__________

"It must be realized that
whoever controls the
volume of money in any
country is absolutely
master of all industry
commerce."
__________
NOW GUESS
WHERE THE
BUCK STOPS!
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN January / February 2009 - 23
Books and Materials Ordering Information:
Books and Materials are mailed First Class Mail or UPS (please include
street address for UPS delivery). Please discharge your Order by Cash
(sent certified mail) or Postal Money Order(s) with Pay To to TAB.
Sorry, No checks accepted for book orders! Prices subject to change
w/o notice. TAB is not responsible for lost or stolen books/materials
from P.O/U.P.S! Please include a phone number or EMAIL address
with your order! Allow two to six weeks for delivery.
Send your book order(s) to:
The Americans Bulletin, c/o P.O. Box 3096
Central Point, Oregon 97502.
Include Name, EMAIL & Phone Number with
ALL Orders and Communications.
KEEP UPDATED -- STAY INFORMED!
Dont Miss The Next Exciting Issue!
THE AMERICANS BULLETIN
c/o Post Office Box 3096 - Central Point, Oregon [97502]
Telephones (541) 779-7709
Yes! I want to subscribe! Please start my subscription to
The Americans Bulletin with the issue. Enclosed is:
$40.00 One Year Subscription
$50.00 For Subscription mailed in Plain Envelope
$40.00 For PRISONER Subscription
$10.00 For Single Current Issue
$60.00 For all Foreign Country Subscriptions
* This is a New Renewal Subscription (check one!)
PLEASE make your payment by Postal Money Order, Check (pay-
able to The Americans Bulletin) or Cash - send secured or certified!
Name:________________________________________________
Address:______________________________________________
City:_________________________________________________
State:__________________________Postal Zone:____________
Email:________________________________________________
Sorry no refunds on subscriptions!
B
B
o
o
o
o
k
k
s
s
A
A
n
n
d
d
M
M
a
a
t
t
e
e
r
r
i
i
a
a
l
l
s
s

ACD PACKET: Adm Claim for Damages/TORT NOW with CD A84 $ 77.00
Are You A Non-Resident Alien? A3 $ 10.00
Awaken Your Personal Power to Change A206 $ 25.00
Bank Officers Handbook of Commercial Banking Law A63 $ 92.00
BEFORE THE JUDGE V15 $ 30.00
Blacks Law Dict.: 1st Ed. (Reprint) L3 $ 237.00
Blacks Law Dict.: 2nd Ed. (Reprint) L4 $ 237.00
CAUSE and The CURE of The Raging WAR A101 $ 37.00
CLARKSONS IND CONTRACTOR AGREEMENTS V8 $ 22.00
COMMERCIAL/DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SELECTED WP 01 $ 105.00
Conditional Acceptance for Value, PLUS 14 files on CD V7 $ 77.00
Conditional Acceptance for Value, NO CD V7-B $ 37.00
Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation NH1 $ 38.00
Credit River, Judgment - FRNS UNCONSTITUTIONAL A67 $ 28.00
Dictionary of Banking, 6th Edition Reprint A200 $ 82.00
Effective Assistance of Counsel Report (EAC) V1 $ 44.00
ESSIAC BOOKLET Plus 1 BAG of TEA for Cancer V14 $ 27.00
FOIA: Freedom of Information Act Packet V19 $ 22.00
Ganos Commercial Law 1920s Text Book A202 $ 27.00
Handbook For Special Agents A31 $ 34.00
Handbook On The Law of Mortgages: REPRINT A98 $ 82.00
I Wants To Own My Land: Expose on Allodial Land Issues A37 $ 33.00
In itinere by Apostill; Become a neutral within martial law V5 $ 27.00
INVISIBLE CONTRACTS: By George Mercier, 463 pages A90 $ 56.00
ISA [ International Sovereign Association ] 02 $ 10.00
Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within States: Parts I & II A21 $ 34.00
Legal Opinion Request Packet A 204 $ 37.00
Memo In Support of Apl for Habeas Corpus, Supv Release A 205 $ 23.00
MEMO ON INTL BILLS OF EXCHANGE New Addition A207 $ 12.00



THE MEMORANDUMS BOOK New Addition A209 $ 25.00
Metro 1313 The Head of The Beast? A33 $ 17.00
Money Brief STOP THE JUDGMENT! V10 $ 77.00
Paramount Lien of the International Bankers, IRS Related A91 $ 17.00
Police Misconduct: Law & Litigation A9 $ 37.00
Press Card: The Americans Bulletin - 2 year T3 $ 80.00
Press Card: The Americans Bulletin - 5 year T4 $ 155.00
PRISON PACKET, The Reason Prisoners Are There! V20 $ 22.00
Private Commercial (Lien) Process, Study Manual + CD A79 $ 97.00
REDEMPTION COMPANION - Ref Source, 100 Articles A94 $ 47.00
Redemption Manual 4th Edition - Become a SPC A203 $ 115.00
Redemption Primer, The New Addition A208 $ 2.00
REDEMPTION The Cold Hard Facts By Qui Tam A100 $ 53.00
Secret Nutritional Formulas For Good Health By A83 $ 17.00
Secured Party/Creditor High Quality Plastic Photo ID Card V4 $ 80.00
Shetars Effect On English Law, Mortgages in The US 01 $ 5.00
Short History of the Bible, A - 1881 REPRINT A38 $ 31.00
Special Problems In Handling Pro Se Litigation A10 $ 25.00
SPECIAL COUNSEL ID New Addition T5 $ 80.00
Stop The IRS - Wheres Your Authority A8 $ 9.00
Traveling By Right No License Driving EXPANDED A39 $ 39.00
- Dismiss All Traffic Tickets CD with Traveling By Right V6 $ 102.00
TREZEVANT, CITY OF TAMPA Court Case A4 $ 10.00
ULTIMATE REDEMPTION SEMINAR, THE [4 CD Set ] CDS1 $ 80.00
Unconstitutionality of the 14th Amendment V13 $ 10.00
uSA is BANKRUPT NOW!, The - Documented Evidence A11 $ 22.00
VOID JUDGMENT: Manual + CD New Addition A210 $ 68.00
VULTURES OATH OF OFFICE on JUDGES V16 $ 14.00
War Powers Act Legislation: State of National Emergency A7 $ 36.00

102808
N NE Ew w I It tE EM M F Fu ul ll ly y s se ea ar rc ch ha ab bl le e c cd d, , E Ea as sy y t to o u us se e & & F Fi in nd d w wh ha at t y yo ou u n ne ee ed d J Ju us st t A Ar rr rI IV VE Ed d
B Bl la ac ck k s s L La aw w D Di ic ct ti io on na ar ry y, , 1 1s st t 2 2n nd d E Ed di it ti io on ns s o on n C CD D R RS S 0 01 1 $ $ 3 33 3. .0 00 0

Support The FREE Press Subscribe Today !
R
T
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

s
B
u
l
l
e
t
i
n
c
/
o

P
.
O
.

B
o
x

3
0
9
6
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

P
o
i
n
t
,

O
r
e
g
o
n
[
9
7
5
0
2
]
J
A
N

-

F
E
B

2
0
0
9
(
5
4
1
)

7
7
9
-
7
7
0
9
S
i
n
g
l
e

I
s
s
u
e

$
1
0

e
a
.
V
o
l

3
0
,

I
s
s
u
e

0
1
-
0
2
S
u
b
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:

$
4
0

Y
r
.

P
L
E
A
S
E

C
H
E
C
K

Y
O
U
R

E
X
P
.

D
A
T
E

(
#
/
0
0
)

O
N


L
A
B
E
L
P
l
e
a
s
e

a
f
f
i
x
$
1
.
5
1
1
s
t

C
l
a
s
s

P
o
s
t
a
g
e

M
A
d
O
F
F
'
s

$
5
0

B
I
L
L
I
O
N

F
r
A
u
d

h
I
t
s

O
t
h
E
r

I
N
V
E
s
t
O
r
s

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1

O
B
A
M
A
'
s

E
c
O
N
O
M
I
c

p
L
A
N


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1

O
I
L

I
N

t
h
E

u
.
s
.
A
.
?


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1

t
h
E

g
L
O
B
A
L

p
O
V
E
r
t
y

A
c
t

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

3

u
.
N
.

p
r
E
d
I
c
t
s

d
O
L
L
A
r

c
O
L
L
A
p
s
E

I
N

2
0
0
9


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

3

c
O
M
M
O
N

t
y
r
A
N
t
s

A
N
d

p
u
B
L
I
c

O
p
p
r
E
s
s
O
r
s


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.


4

A
N

O
p
E
N

L
E
t
t
E
r

t
O

t
h
E

O
F
F
I
c
E
r
s

O
F

t
h
E

u
.
s
.

M
I
L
I
t
A
r
y

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

4

J
E
W
S

C
O
N
F
I
R
M

B
I
G

M
E
D
I
A

I
S

J
E
W
I
S
H

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

5

T
H
E

C
O
U
R
T

M
Y
S
T
E
R
Y

S
O
L
V
E
D

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6

h
O
O
L
I
g
A
N
s

A
N
d

t
h
E

p
r
O
p
E
r
t
y

t
A
x

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

7

M
O
N
T
A
N
A

U
N
V
E
I
L
S

D
R
I
V
E
R
'
S

L
I
C
E
N
S
E

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

8

N
E
W

I
D

S
C
A
N
N
E
R
S

A
T

B
O
R
D
E
R
S

R
A
I
S
E

P
R
I
V
A
C
Y

A
L
A
R
M

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.


8

T
E
C
H
-
A
D
D
L
E
D

J
U
R
O
R
S

U
N
D
E
R
M
I
N
E

J
U
S
T
I
C
E

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

8

C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E

G
O
V
E
R
N
M
E
N
T

V
S
.

G
O
V
E
R
N
M
E
N
T

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

1
0

D
I
S
C
H
A
R
G
E
O
F
D
E
B
T
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
1
1

T
H
E

F
E
D
E
R
A
L

R
E
S
E
R
V
E
:

H
I
S
T
O
R
Y

O
F

L
I
E
S
,

T
H
I
E
V
E
R
Y

A
N
D

D
E
C
E
I
T

.
.
.
.
.

1
2

P
O
R
T

O
F

L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y

U
N
D
E
R

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

O
F

C
H
I
N
E
S
E

.

.
.
.

1
3

U
.
S
.

B
E
G
I
N
S

R
E
C
A
L
L
I
N
G

A
L
L

R
E
T
I
R
E
D

M
I
L
I
T
A
R
Y

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

1
4

T
H
E

F
E
D
S

A
R
E

W
A
T
C
H
I
N
G

A
N
D

L
I
S
T
E
N
I
N
G

.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.

1
4

I
R
S

A
G
E
N
T

C
O
M
M
I
T
S

T
A
X

F
R
A
U
D

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1
5

k
O
p
B
u
s
t
E
r
s

B
u
s
t

c
r
O
O
k
E
d

c
O
p
s

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.

1
6

u
s
u
r
p
A
t
I
O
N
.
.
.

w
h
A
t

s
h
O
u
L
d

B
E

d
O
N
E

A
B
O
u
t

I
t
?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1
6

t
h
E

r
I
g
h
t

t
O

t
r
A
V
E
L

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.

1
7

N
A
s
A

M
A
r
s

p
h
O
t
O

L
E
A
k
E
d

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1
8

A

N
A
t
I
O
N

s
t
A
N
d
I
N
g

u
N
d
E
r

g
O
d

I
s

r
E
-
B
O
r
N

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1
9

B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N

B
O
A
R
D

P
A
G
E

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

2
1

B
O
O
k
s

&

M
A
t
E
r
I
A
L
s

A
N
d

S
U
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N

F
O
R
M
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
3
'
S
U
P
P
O
R
T

T
H
E

F
R
E
E

P
R
E
S
S
'