Page

1(5)

FMEA
Document name Part no

System

Design

Process
Date Issue Issued by

Moulds and die's Manufacturing Company

9th March,2012
Component

Approved by Function RPN 200 RPN 100 -199 RPN 1-99

Document status

Pos.

FUNCTION

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE Wrong Type of Material

POTENTIAL CAUSES

POTENTIAL EFFECTS

DETECTION METHOD

Out of spec

SEV OCC DET RPN 8 5 3 120 0 0 0 392 0 0 0 0 200

Recommended Action(s)

SEV OCC DET RPN 4 2 3 24 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 100

Received Material

Wrong Thickness of Material

Supplier ships wrong type of material

Questionable durability

Verify material to P.O. / material certification and measure sample

Wrong Width of Material

Wrong Die 2 Wrong Program

Incorrect Set-Up

Amount and time of feed will be incorrect

Parts will not be created to assemble

10

10

Verify die # on die face plate

10

Incorrect Set-Up Damaged goods silvers, Burrs Undersized condition

Parts will not be Amount and time of feed created to will be incorrect assemble May effect dimensions May effect dimensions May not fit assembly May not fit assembly

10

10

0 400

Verify program name w/ set-up

10

0 50

Wrong Criteria 3 Wrong GO Gauges

10 10

2 2

7 10

140 Complete Checklist Form 0 200 Complete Checklist Form 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10

40 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10

Template FMEA, Issue 2004-07-14

Copyright Meldert Engineering AB

Page

2(5)

FMEA
Document name Part no

System

Design

Process
Date Issue Issued by

Moulds and die's Manufacturing Company

9th March,2012
Component

Approved by Function RPN 200 RPN 100 -199 RPN 1-99

Document status

Pos.

FUNCTION

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE Wrong Type of Material

POTENTIAL CAUSES

POTENTIAL EFFECTS

DETECTION METHOD

SEV OCC DET RPN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recommended Action(s)

SEV OCC DET RPN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Received Material

Supplier ships wrong type of material

Verify material to P.O. / material certification and measure sample

Template FMEA, Issue 2004-07-14

Copyright Meldert Engineering AB

SEVERITY Rank Effect rate Criteria Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects personal safety, safe item Hazardous- without operation and/or involves non-compliance with 10 warning government regulation without warning Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe item operation and/or involves non-compliance with government regulation with warning Item inoperable, with loss of primary function. Item operable, but at reduced level of performance. Customer dissatisfied. Item operable, but Comfort/ Convience item(s) inoperable. Customer experiences discomfort. Item operable, but Comfort/ Convience item(s) operable at reduced level of performance. Customer experiences some dissatisfaction. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by average customers. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by most customers. Fit & finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers. No effect.

Hazardous- with 9 warning 8 Very High 7 High 6 Moderate

5 Low

4 Very low 3 Minor 2 Very minor 1 None

Rank 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

CPK < 0.33 > 0.33 > 0.51 > 0.67 > 0.83 > 1.00 > 1.17 > 1.33 > 1.50 > 1.67

OCCURENCE Failure Rate Criteria < 1 in 2 Very High: 1 in 3 Failure almost inevitable 1 in 8 High: 1 in 20 Repeated failures 1 in 80 Moderate: 1 in 400 Occasional failures 1 in 2000 1 in 15 000 Low: 1 in 150 000 Relatively few failures < 1 in 1 500 000 Remote: Failure is unlikeley

DETECTION Rank Detection rate Criteria Design Control will not and/or cannot detect a potential 10 Absolute uncertainty cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode; or there is no Design Control. 9 Very remote Very Remote chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Remote chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Very Low chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Low chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Moderate chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Moderately High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Very High chance the Design Control will detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. Design Controls will almost certainly detect a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode.

8 Remote

7 Very low 6 Low 5 Moderate

4 Moderately high 3 High 2 Very high 1 Almost certain