Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Agenda
1. Economic Capital Overview 2. EC Methodology - Credit Risk Example 3. Regulatory Requirements 4. Comparison EC and RC
EC
Counterparty defaults
Market movements
P&L volatility
Business units
Client relationships Portfolio strategies
RCM RAI Christian Duesterberg page 4
Transaction level
Portfolio level
Sound economic capital methodology provides a good measure of any banks risk in relation to its stated targets => individually healthy banks: stable banking system
Expected Shortfall Allocation: EC Contribution of a Business Unit to the Economic Capital of the Bank Average loss of the Business Unit in the tail of the portfolio loss distribution
cec cec cec cec cec
probability
99.98% quantile
portfolio loss
EC Allocation
Expected Shortfall Allocation: Contribution of a Business Unit to the Economic Capital of the Bank = Average loss of the Business Unit in the tail of the portfolio loss distribution
RCM RAI Christian Duesterberg page 6
Portfolio: ESFQ = E[Lportfolio | Lportfolio > quantileQ (Lportfolio)], Business Unit: ESF(BU) = E[LBU | Lportfolio > quantileQ (Lportfolio)]
Agenda
1. Economic Capital Overview 2. EC Methodology - Credit Risk Example 3. Regulatory Requirements 4. Comparison EC and RC
Expected Loss
PD Economic Capital
Industry,
LGD EAD
Country,
Client specific
RCM RAI Christian Duesterberg page 8
Portfolio specific
Expected Shortfall
Average
Expected Loss: amount of Portfolio Losses expected in the following year Unexpected Loss: volatility of Portfolio Losses (measured in Standard Deviations) Value at Risk: defined as a quantile Confidence Level: derived from Target Rating Economic Capital: (Value at Risk) minus (Expected Loss) Expected Shortfall: average of large Portfolio Losses (large defined by threshold)
LP = li LGDi 1( Di )
i =1
1(Di) =
20
12
10
8 6 5
5
Economic Capital
7 6 4 3 2 4 3 2 1
17 18 19 20
4 3 2 2
Expected Loss
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Years / Scenarios
No default
Default
Next counterparty
Add exposure of counterparty to loss after last counterparty Portfolio loss in simulation
Defaults happen if an ability-to-pay of a firm falls below a threshold Default correlations are driven by correlations of Ability-to-Pay processes decomposed into systematic part (correlated to industry
and country factors) specific part
Asset value Obligor 1
Default Threshold 2
Default Threshold 1
Correlations between systematic risk factors are calibrated using equity data
Today
Planning horizon
corr > 0
A= R
weight
j =1
factorj + 1 R
2
CP A
CP B
specific part
corr > 0
corr > 0
R2 quantifies the fraction of systematic risk in the counterparty: most important driver of correlation of an obligor
RCM RAI Christian Duesterberg page 13
Factor
. 0 0.2
EL
0.4
0.6
0.8
Multi-State
AAA AA
VREF -VAAA VREF -VAA VREF -VA VREF -VBBB VREF -VBB VREF -VB VREF -VCCC VREF -VDef
No Defaul t Loss = 0 2 2 Default Loss = LGD*EAD Today: rating R0 Planning horizon Value with rating R0: VREF
Rating migration depends on initial rating & a migration matrix Value in rating class at horizon depends on cash flow valuation:
dependence on EAD and LGD dependence on maturity, default curve, interest rates
CreditMetrics (Risk Metrics) Definition of Risk Credit Events Includes interest rate risk Risk drivers Transition Probabilities Market value Downgrade/ Default No Country and industry factors
Constant Standard Correlation of credit events multivariate Random (beta Recovery rates distribution) Numerical approach Simulation
Agenda
1. Economic Capital Overview 2. EC Methodology - Credit Risk Example 3. Regulatory Requirements 4. Comparison EC and RC
Regulatory Requirements
Risk Sensitivity Transparency Simplicity Benchmarking
EL
PD EAD LGD
PD LGD EAD
1 1+ (M 2.5) b(PD) R RWA= 12.5 EAD LGD N N 1(PD) + N 1(0.999) PD 1 R 11.5 b(PD) 1 R
EC
IRBA
1 1+ (M 2.5) b(PD) R = R R 1 1 N (PD)+ N (0.999) PD RWA= 12.5 EAD LGD N 1 R 11.5 b(PD) 1 R
2 Basel II DB's internal model
Regulatory capital for credit risk = 8%* RWA*SF + Shortfall Basel II underlying model is a single global factor with identical weight 1 for all counterparts Parameter R reflects the asset correlation between counterparts being a function of PD (R decreases with increasing PD differing by asset class) In the limit of reducing DBs factor model to a single factor model, relation between the Basel II defined asset correlation R and the R2 parameter used in DBs capital model:
R
RCM RAI Christian Duesterberg page 20
Basel II
R 2 DB 's
internal
model
200,00% 190,00%
Rating
AA A
Maturity Adjustments
500.00%
400.00%
BBB
BB
CCC
Risk weight
300.00%
CC
200.00%
100,00% 90,00%
100.00%
80,00% 70,00%
0.00%
85 .0 3% 50 .0 3% 55 .0 3% 30 .0 3% 25 .0 3% 10 .0 3% 15 .0 3% 20 .0 3% 40 .0 3% 35 .0 3% 45 .0 3% 60 .0 3% 65 .0 3% 70 .0 3% 75 .0 3% 80 .0 3% 90 .0 3% 95 .0 3% 0. 03 % 5. 03 %
60,00% 50,00% 1 1,25 1,5 1,75 2 2,25 2,5 2,75 3 3,25 3,5 3,75 4 4,25 4,5 4,75 5
PD
Maturity
Regulatory capital reduction (increase) for loans with maturity under (above) 2.5 years depending on the creditworthiness of the customer Regulatory capital reduction for SMEs (corporates with annual sales up to EUR 50mn) by a firm-size adjustment
Agenda
1. Economic Capital Overview 2. EC Methodology - Credit Risk Example 3. Regulatory Requirements 4. Comparison EC and RC
Basel II
Single factor model for different asset classes (corporates, sovereigns, retail, SMEs) One size fits all model Capital allocated to each borrower in isolation Capital allocation is given by a function of :
PD, LGD, EAD, Maturity Customer type (-> asset correlation)
Risk sensitive capital allocation, i.e. increased capital assignment upon credit downgrade
Full recognition of diversification according to country/industry correlation Penalties for sector or name concentration
Limited recognition of diversification, e.g. no diversification between corporate and retail portfolios Increased procyclicality, e.g., systematic amplification of the economic cycle
Procyclicality