PROGRAM ANNUAL MONITORING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENT: DISCIPLINE/MODULE EVALUATION

The name of the module The speciality, the degree awarded The Faculty (chair) Dat The year of study (1, 2, 3 or 4) The Academic group

The university continually strives to revise and improve the quality of teaching and learning. The purpose of this survey is to give the teaching staff of SEUA an opportunity to take into account the student`s opinion in the process of revision of module/discipline. Your answers are very valuable to us, and filling in the questionnaire will take you only a few minutes. None of the personal opinions will be published or disclosed, but the answers will be considered while summing up the data stream. Comments (questions 13-15) must be constructive and reliable. They can include such peculiarities of the discipline or the module as the content of the presented material, style of teaching and the presentation form, classrooms and laboratories facilities, as well as other related to the discipline or the module details. The final results of the survey will be considered in the corresponding faculty and the university divisions in due course providing feedback from students. Please, respond to the questions 112, noting an answer that most correctly reflects your opinion. To the questions 13-15, please, give a written comment. After each question, you can add an additional comment you woud like to make.
1. The methods of teaching and assistance to learning of the material (independent work) applied in the lectures helped my learning Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completel y disagree Not applicable

Additional comments: 2. The consulting methods helped my learning Completely Agree Disagree Completely Difficult to agree disagree answer

Not applicabl e

Additional comments: 3. The methods of teaching and assistance to learning of the material applied in seminars/practical classes helped my learning Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree Not applicabl e

Additional comments: 4. The methods of teaching and assistance to independent work applied in the laboratory works helped my learning Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree Not applicabl e

Additional comments: 5. There were adequate resources in the library available for acquisition of this module/discipline Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 6. IT facilities for teaching and learning were adequate for the module/discipline requirements Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 7. The supplementary materials available for this module/discipline (e.g. lecture outlines, presentations, case packages and other resources) were favourable for my learning Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 8. I was given sufficient information on the module/discipline timetable and scheduled activities Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 9. The module/discipline workload for the given academic hours was realistic Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 10. I think the discipline/module was interesting Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments:

11. The module/discipline content met my expectations Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments: 12. The feedback I received from the lecturer during my work of this module/discipline supported my learning Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments:

13. What do you find the most useful thing in this module? Comment 1

Comment 2

Comment 3 14. What do you find the least useful thing in this module?

Comment 1

Comment 2

Comment 3 15. Have you any suggestions to make changes in this module?

Comment 1

Comment 2

Comment 3

Thank you for participation

Questionnaire for alumni evaluation of the study program

The name of the study program (speciality/specialization) The qualification degree The year of graduation The current job and occupational area of the graduate

The university continually strives to revise and improve the quality of teaching and learning. The purpose of this survey is to give the teaching staff of SEUA an opportunity to take into account the opinions of alumni in the revision of the study program. Your answers are very valuable to us, and filling in the questionnaire will take you only a few minutes. Comments (questions 14-16) must be constructive and reliable. The final results of the survey will be considered in the corresponding faculty and the university divisions in due course providing feedback from alumni. Please, respond to the questions 1-13 noting an answer that most correctly reflects your opinion. To the questions 11-16, please, give a written comment. After each question, you can add an additional comment you woud like to make.
1. The program and the teaching methods allow you to acquire enough theoretical knowledge to be engaged in professional activities Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

2. The program and the teaching methods allow you to acquire practical skills Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

3. The program and the teaching methods allow you to develop abilities to formulate and solve engineering problems Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

4. The program and the teaching methods allow you to develop management skills Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

5. The program and the teaching methods allow you to develop skills in using a computer and applied programs Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

6. The program and the teaching methods allow you to acquire enough linguistic skills for professional activities Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

7. The general engineering disciplines were provided by highly qualified teaching staff Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

8. The disciplines in specialty were provided by highly qualified teaching staff Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

9. The assessment methods of the student`s knowledge were fair. Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

10. The industrial internship allowed to improve the professional knowledge and practical skills Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

11. The type of companies of the industrial internship corresponded to the speciality field and the diploma title Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

12. The academic laboratories and classrooms are equipped with

modern technical facilities Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

13. The program is provided with literature on the speciality, handouts (including the electronic versions) and other teaching materials Completely Agree agree Additional comments Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

14. What were you most satisfied with while studying this program?
(disciplines, teaching methods, students assessment, learning and laboratory facilities, IT facilities, quality of the teaching staff, companies of the industrial internship etc.)

Comment 1)

Comment 2)

Comment 3) 15. What were you least satisfied with while studying this program?
(disciplines, teaching methods, assessment of students, learning and laboratory facilities, IT facilities, quality of the teaching staff, companies of the industrial internship etc.)

Comment 1)

Comment 2)

Comment 3) 16. What changes would you recommend to make in this program?

Suggestion 1)

Suggestion 2)

Suggestion 3)

Thank you for participation

Alumnus Date

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR EMPLOYERS: SATISFACTION EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAM ALUMNI

The name of study program (speciality/specialization) The qualification degree The name of the company The number of the given program graduates working at your company What year alumni are represented in the survey

The university continually strives to revise and improve the quality of teaching and learning. The purpose of this survey is to give the teaching staff of SEUA an opportunity to take into account the opinions of employers in the revision of the study program. Your answers are very valuable to us, and filling in the questionnaire will take you only a few minutes. Comments (questions 11-12) must be constructive and reliable. The final results of the survey will be considered in the corresponding faculty and the university divisions in due course providing feedback from employers. Please, respond to the questions 1-10, noting an answer that most correctly reflects your opinion. To the questions 11-12, please, give a written comment. After each question, you can add an additional comment you woud like to make. For commentary questions 13-14 an extended list of professional competencies of the program is given.
1. The theoretical knowledge of alumni meet the job requirements Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 2. Alumni demonstrate practical skills Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 3. Alumni are able to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 4. Alumni are capable of solving management problems Completely Agree Difficult to Disagree Completely

agree Additional comments

answer

disagree

5. Alumni have knowledge of computer technology and applied programs Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 6. Alumni have satisfactory knowledge of foreign languages in the professional field Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 7. Alumni have the necessary practical skills in office work in Armenian (preparion of documentation and texts) Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 8. Alumni prove to have creative approach in their professional activities Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 9. Alumni have satisfactory business skills Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 10. Alumni have skills in cooperation with colleagues and teamwork Completely agree Agree Difficult to answer Disagree Completely disagree

Additional comments 11. What improvements would you suggest to make the laboratory facilities in this program up to date

Suggestion 1) Suggestion 2) Suggestion 3) 12. What changes would you suggest to improve the professional skills of the graduates Suggestion1) Suggestion 2) Suggestion 3) 13. What are the most important 8 general engineering competencies (mark the ones in the list attached) 14. What are the most important 5 core speciality competencies (mark the ones in the list attached)

Thank you for participation Head of the company / Date Official Stamp /