Latest Stories

Its now defense as Corona trial resumes

Commentary
Farmers, elections and Smartmatic
By: Ernesto M. Ordoez
Philippine Daily Inquirer
9:54 pm | Thursday, March 8th, 2012
0

Recommend
The agricultural sector constitutes the largest voting group in the country. But the integrity of its vote
will be compromised by the possible decision of Comelec to allow Smartmatic to sell its discredited
machines for the 2013 elections. This spells disaster.
During the 2010 elections, three critical groups were routinely called during the Senate and House
deliberations of the proposed automated election system. These were Namfrel, Automated Election
System Watch and the Alyansa Agrikultura. It was the first time the agricultural sector took part in
congressional hearings that would determine the conduct of elections.
The Alyansa Agrikultura, a coalition of 42 federations and organizations representing all agricultural
sectors, made a significant contribution during these hearings. Congressional co-chair Rep. Teodoro
Locsin cited the AA recommendation on a proposed audit procedure that AA had designed with
Mahar Mangahas of the Social Weather Stations and Baltazar Endriga, the SGV partner who created
and headed the SGVs information technology division.
AA also secured the signatures of the presidential candidates (except two) favoring an election audit
that was published in major newspapers. However, the Melo Commission turned down the AA
proposal.
Today, AA unites with several groups that strongly oppose the inclusion of Smartmatic among the
bidders for next years election machines. We hope that the Brillante Commission (the current
Comelec) does not follow the sad example of the Melo Commission (the former Comelec).
Smartmatic deficiencies
The major deficiencies of the Smartmatic machines during the 2010 elections are too many to cite
here. However, we will cite three:
The compact flash cards that determine how votes would be counted were not certified and found
defective only one week before the 2010 elections. To make matters worse, they were changed
0 New share 0
Farmers, elections and Smartmatic | Inquirer Business http://business.inquirer.net/48239/farmers-elections-and-smartmatic
1 of 3 3/12/2012 3:25 PM
We Recommend
Presidents daughter who built a
career in PR
Loyal Innova owners speak up
4 Filipinos killed in Canada car
From Around The Web
Is the Lottery Ever a Good
Investment? (Betterment)
These 4 Huge Economies are in
Deep Trouble (StreetAuthority)
without the necessary certification. This is a main reason why there are so many anomalies that
remain unresolved.
Several provisions to safeguard the integrity of the votes, such as the ultra-violet lamps and the
digital signatures, were not only not provided, but actually disabled.
There is therefore no certainty that the votes at the precinct level were the actual votes finally
recorded for the election.
The Smartmatic machines may well be second-hand. A Sept. 17, 2011, Inquirer report stated: A
compact flash card used in one of the precincts in Pikit, North Cotabato, yielded the results of the
election in Colombia. In a March 5, 2012, letter to the Brillante Commission, AES Watch (where
Agriwatch is a member) stated: Considering their use in previous election exercises in another
country, the question of how old the PCOS machines are becomes a major concern.
Conclusion
Since at least eight Philippine and international election-monitoring groups have cited major
deficiencies in Smartmatic that remain undisputed, why allow Smartmatic to bid for next years
crucial elections?
An official argued: Because Smartmatic may be cheaper. To which a Comelec Commissioner
responded: It is also cheaper to buy pirated DVDs, but it is wrong.
Allowing Smartmatic to bid may give you a cheaper price, but it is wrong. It would be deplorable if
the Brillante Commission follows the misguided direction of the Melo Commission.
March is Womens Month
The only voting sector larger than the agricultural sector is women. Chair Winnie Monsod of the
Movement for Good Governance will explain why many women strongly oppose Smartmatics
possible involvement in next years elections. This is supported by leaders of the Rural Womens
Movement.
AES Watch has stated: We respectfully submit that the noncompliance by Smartmatic-Tim of the
minimum requirements and capabilities that impaired the accuracy, security and auditability of the
May 2010 elections should be a ground for disqualifying the company from participating in the
bidding for the 2013 elections.
All who value election integrity should join hands with these agriculture and women groups in
strongly opposing Smartmatics involvement in next years electoral exercises.
The author is chairman of Agriwatch, former secretary for presidential flagship programs and
former undersecretary of agriculture and trade. For inquiries, e-mail agriwatch_phil@yahoo.com
or telefax (02) 8522112.
Farmers, elections and Smartmatic | Inquirer Business http://business.inquirer.net/48239/farmers-elections-and-smartmatic
2 of 3 3/12/2012 3:25 PM