Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
These techniques can often work with children who have a typical neurology, who
process verbal requests easily and who read subtle social clues. These children have
impulse control that is appropriate to their age and the sensory system that allows them to
accurately assess their environment.
However, these same reinforcement techniques are effective in a very limited way with
special needs kids—if at all.
A parent or teacher who is good at monitoring the child’s regulation will get much
further at getting calm, organized behavior out of the child.
Barry Prizant, one of the leading speech pathologist in the autism field, believes
that a fundamental goal is teaching an autistic child to say “NO” and defend his
boundaries.
Something to think about: if a child has a hard time indicating a basic need, or
cannot indicate “No!” when they are in severe distress over someone else’s
actions, how will reinforcement “teach” him to act better? Reinforcement does
not even touch the heart of the problem, and can even worsen it.
o Children with special needs often have poor executive function because of
problems in the frontal lobes of the brain and this leads to highly impulsive
behavior. Reinforcement does not work well with impulsive behavior because it
comes way after the trigger. You can wear a child down by continually giving
negative reinforcement for impulsive behavior that he has little control over.
Furthermore, children get much more impulsive in stressful situations no matter
what kind of reinforcement you give.
Realize that the process of understanding limits is a complex one even for
typically developing children. If you add cognitive dysfunction, emotional
dysregulation, sensory over or under-reactivity, you can imagine how much more
convoluted and difficult this process is for special needs children. Which leads us
to the final point . . .