Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Part III: Solution Analysis Policy tools I: Market 1. Freeing, facilitating, and stimulating markets 2. Using subsidies and taxes to alter incentives 3. Debate climate change case (homework)
Examine/debate the pros and cons of these tools based on the climate change case
177
178
Choosing impact categories Selecting a solution method Specifying policy alternatives Predicting impacts of alternatives Valuing impacts of alternatives Evaluating and recommending
Information Gathering
Freeing markets
1. Freeing, facilitating, and stimulating markets 2. Using subsidies and taxes to alter incentives 3. Debate climate change case (homework) Deregulation
Government Market
Legalization Privatization
Denationalization Demonopolization (User fees rather than agency subvention) (Contracting-out)
181
183
Facilitating markets
Allocating existing goods
Defining property rights (incl. intellectual property rights) Facilitating the private allocation of goods
Stimulating markets
Auction
of collective goods (radio spectrum, licenses, property rights) of collective bads (waste facilities, prisons)
184
185
Cushions
Stockpiling Transitional assistance (buy/bail-outs, grandfathering) Cash grants more meaningful as subsidy
1. Freeing, facilitating, and stimulating markets 2. Using subsidies and taxes to alter incentives 3. Debate climate change case (homework)
186
187
Taxes
Supply-side
Taxes on producers (e.g. corporate gains, taxes on processes or input goods) Tariffs: taxes on imports (and exports) Commodity/excise taxes
Subsidies
Demand-side
Output taxes (Pigovian tax) User fees Supply side Matching grants, block grants to state and local governments Grants/subsidies to producers Tax expenditures (corporate income tax) Demand side In-kind subsidies Vouchers Tax expenditures Transfers to people (e.g. child allowances)
Supply-side vs. demand-side taxes: Whats better? (e.g. CO2 tax, tax on plastic bags)
189
Tax expenditures vs. transfers: Whats better? (e.g. SCHIPS, child care)
190
15 min joint discussion 3-5 min define and defend 3 min critique Brief rebuttal
191
193
But also note how defending a viewpoint is different from writing a memo:
Focus on those criteria (impact categories) that promise positive outcomes and build a convincing case But being aware of the criteria (impact categories) that the opponents may point to as negatives
194