Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
C-K. Chou, Ph.D. * Chairman, Technical Committee 95 International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Piscataway, New Jersey USA
*speaking as an individual and not for IEEE
IEEE ICES
IEEE/ICES TC95/SC4
C95.1-2005 IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz
Science-based recommendations are made to protect against all established adverse effects in human beings associated with RF exposure 3 kHz to 5 MHz, minimize effects associated with electrostimulation 100 kHz to 300 GHz, protect against effects associated with heating Adopted by ANSI on November 2, 2006 IEEE ICES
IEEE/ICES TC95/SC2
IEEE C95.7-2005 Recommended Practice for Radiofrequency Exposure Safety Programs Designed to complement IEEE C95.1-2005. To provide reasonable and adequate guidance for the controlled exposure to prevent or control hazards associated with RF sources
IEEE ICES
Exposure limits based on IEEE C95.1-1991 and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report 86 (1986) Measurement methods based on IEEE 1528 (published in 2003) Newer regulations by KDB Knowledge Data Base
New Delhi, India Feb 8, 2012 Slide 5
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
Federal RF Interagency Working Group consists of officials from Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Communications Commission, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration Meeting on May 9, 2006 to introduce the new C95.12005 standard, harmonization with ICNIRP on peak SAR, and power density limits for general population exposure Meeting again on September 30, 2009
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
ICNIRP Guidelines Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, France, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, India, Ireland, Malaysia, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Omen, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovak, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Taiwan, Tanzania, Turkey, Uganda, UK, Venezuela IEEE 1991/NCRP 1986 standard (FCC) Bolivia, Canada, Estonia (IEEE1991), Panama, USA Below ICNIRP and IEEE Belarus, Bulgaria, China, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Russia,
Safety limit
10x
Large Safety Margins
50x
Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) For Cell Phones: What It Means For You There is considerable confusion and misunderstanding about the meaning
of the maximum reported Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) values for cell phones (and other wireless devices). ..the SAR values collected by the FCC are intended only to ensure that the cell phone does not exceed the FCCs maximum permissible exposure levels even when operating in conditions which result in the devices highest possible but not its typical - RF energy absorption for a user.*
* The average terminal output power for 3G voice calls was below 1mW for any environment
including rural, urban, and dedicated indoor networks. Bioelectromagnetics, online: 19 OCT 2011
New Delhi, India Feb 8, 2012 Slide 12
IEEE ICES
For threshold effects, when a large margin of safety is assured, anything below is safe.
Whether it is a 50 foot tall or a 5 foot tall boat, they are all safe to go under the Golden Gate Bridge. New Delhi, India Feb 8, 2012 IEEE ICES
Slide 13
IEEE ICES
IEC TC106
Methods for the assessment of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields associated with human exposure
New Delhi, India Feb 8, 2012 Slide 15
IEEE ICES
Scope: characterization of the electromagnetic environments with regard to human exposure measurement methods; instrumentation and procedures calculation methods assessment methods for exposure produced by specific sources (in so far as this task is not carried out by specific product committees) basic standards for other sources assessment of uncertainties
IEEE ICES
IEC TC106
WG1: Measurement and calculation methods for low frequency (0 to 100 kHz) electric and magnetic fields and induced currents WG2: Characterization of low frequency electric and magnetic fields from specific devices WG3: Measurement and assessment of high frequency (100 kHz to 300 GHz) electromagnetic fields WG4: Characterization of high frequency electromagnetic fields and specific absorption rate (SAR) produced by specific sources WG5: Generic standards: general application and common practices
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES
Hand-held and bodymounted wireless devices Adopted by CENELEC as EN62209-2:2010 Corresponding draft product standard under voting by EU National Committees
IEEE ICES
IEEE ICES TC34 SC1 & IEC TC106 MT1-62209 Experimental methods
Address head & body SAR 0.3 - 6 GHz by measurements Goal: IEC/IEEE dual-logo standard Current topics hand effect to head SAR, separation distance in body SAR and hand SAR (in future) Revised versions of IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1 CDV
New features frequency range > 6 GHz, Fast SAR, SAR test reduction
IEEE ICES
IEC 62232-2011
Determination of RF field strength and SAR in the vicinity of radio communication base stations for the purpose of evaluating human exposure
IEEE ICES
IEEE C95.1/ICNIRP guidelines (Harmonized on major issues and limits) Converge of science based standards IEC 62209-1/IEEE 1528 (at ear) (Totally harmonized) IEC 62209-2 (in front of face, body)
Conclusions
ICNIRP and IEEE have RF exposure standards, with large safety margins to protect all population IEEE and IEC have RF exposure assessment standards FCC 1997 regulation was based on IEEE 95.1-1991 and NCRP report 86 (1986) IEEE C95.1-2005 has harmonized with ICNIRP guidelines on SAR limits and power density limits for general public exposures No more international RF exposure standard supports the local peak SAR limit of 1.6 W/kg averaged in 1 g tissue
IEEE ICES
Thank you
ck.chou@ieee.org
IEEE ICES