Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Lecture Quality Evaluation Form (Department of Quality Assurance)

Lecturer: ______________________ Department: _____________________ Date: _____________________ Class Strength: _____________ Room No: _________________ Ending time of class: ________ Lecture No: ________________ Yes Lecturer brought attendance file with him/her. Students already had the lecture material /Lecturer provided the material in class Yes No Poor Average Good Excellent No

Subject: ________________________ Class/Sec/Sem: ___________________ Class Timings: ___________________ Lecture No: _______________________ Starting time of class: ____________ Break time and duration: ___________

Topic: ____________________________________________________________ 1-Pre-class Arrangements Lecturer came in the class on time. Lecture was started on time. IT arrangements were made on time. 2-Quality of Environment and Teaching aids Proper Air conditioning Effectively working Multimedia Proper Illumination Effectively working Sound System (if used) Others White board Rostrum Multimedia display Skin Chairs/Benches Wiring Window Blinds 3-Class Decorum Class discipline was effectively maintained Number of students without dress code Number of students poorly dressed up Checking of Dress code by the lecturer Punctuality of students Number of Late coming students Number of absentees Effective sitting arrangements Comments if any Yes No

Yes

No

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Superior University, Lahore.

3-Lecture Delivery
The Topic Lecture arrangement/organizing Feedback on previous lecture/assignment Revision/review of previous lecture/s Lecture plan was effectively followed Lecture ended effectively Content delivery Lecturer had knowledge grip on the topic Lecture explanations were clear and comprehensive Balanced teaching approach (appropriate mix of theory and practice) Contents of the current topic were well organized Lecturer engaged students in class activities, exercises or games Innovation or creativity embedded in the lecture/contents Slides of the lecture were well prepared Y/ N Unacceptable Needs Imp Good Excellent Outstanding

Sequence of activities performed in the session:

Superior University, Lahore.

Students Participation The lecturer encouraged students participation Fair opportunity of students participation was created The lecturer provided opportunity to students to ask questions Use of teaching aids was effective Quality of teaching aids Class Motivation Y/ N Unacceptable The lecturer stimulated students interest in the class Attention to individuals Lecturer positively reinforced the class for participation/assignments etc. The lecturer seemed willing to provide individual help Assessment Y/ N Unacceptable Assignment of the previous class was returned with constructive feedback Assignment for the next class was clearly discussed Assessment marking criteria was clearly mentioned in the class 4-Communication and Personality Y/ N Unacceptable Communicated the lecture content enthusiastically Effective pace adopted by the lecturer Voice control was effective Appropriate use of language Lecture was delivered with confidence and appropriate use of body language Lecturer was dressed up well Appearance of teacher (friendly, brash etc.) Was any one from the quality circle present in the class? Was there any interruption in the class?

Needs Imp

Good

Excellent

Outstanding

Needs Imp

Good

Excellent

Outstanding

Needs Imp

Good

Excellent

Outstanding

Yes Yes

No No

If yes provide details:

Superior University, Lahore.

Short note/key points of the findings

OVERALL RATING OF LECTURER

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement Needs Improvement

Good Good

Excellent Excellent

Outstanding Outstanding

OVERALL RATING OF LECTURE

Unacceptable

Lecture evaluated by: ____________________________

Signature: __________________________

Superior University, Lahore.

S-ar putea să vă placă și