Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Nachash
Lets examine one of the most misunderstood and perhaps -- to most Christians --
confusing verses of Scripture: "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and
between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his
heel,"Gen. 3:15. This is generally said to mean that there would be enmity between
Eve's 'seed' -- and the 'serpent's seed,' which is usually taken to be
descriptive of "Satan the devil." Before we continue, please take a moment to read
the entire second and third chapters of Genesis.
This portion of scripture, of course, deals with the sin of Eve, and Adam's
falling into the same sin. At a first glance, it might appear that the story we
were taught as children is factual -- that is, a snake tricked Eve into eating a
forbidden apple, and then gave her husband a bite of that same forbidden fruit.
Back in the previous chapter, in verses 16 and 17, "Yahweh God commanded the man,
saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou
eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." It seems rather unusual, to me at least,
that Yahweh would put so much importance upon such a seemingly insignificant thing
of whether or not a particular fruit was allowed for consumption. Likewise, His
eventual punishment for this act would seem rather strange if it was indeed the
consumption of fruit, that this passage details.
Certainly, it is beyond doubt that Yahweh has inspired into His Word many parables
and riddles, and a lot of symbolism.
There are many passages that use words that appear to have no relevance to the
topic at hand, but are instead used metaphorically. In addition to our Saviour's
numerous parables, one entire book of the Bible is written in such a manner, the
Book of Canticles (also called the Song of Solomon). This beautiful piece of
poetry is in one sense descriptive of the splendid love between a man and his
wife, and is replete with rather graphic symbolism, using such words as 'rose,'
'dove,' 'myrrh,' amongst other illustrative idioms, which obviously stir feelings
of romance when read. One verse that is especially relevant to our topic is found
in the second chapter of Canticles, verse three: "As the apple tree among the
trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow
with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste." Obviously, what the poet
speaks of here is not a literal tree, nor an apple in the sense of a piece of
fruit. The symbolic nature of the context very cleary affords this a much
different meaning! It is worth noting here the Hebrew words used. "Tree" in this
passage is Strong's #6086, 'ets.' "Fruit" is the word 'peri,' which is Strong's
#6529.
When we take another look at Gen. 2:17, and all other passages under consideration
right now, we find the exact same words being used in the original Hebrew. Could
it not be possible that "tree" as used in the Genesis account of Adam and Eve's
sin is likewise symbolic? The following host of passages would confirm that, I
believe. Please take a few moments to read the following compendium of verses, all
of which use "trees" to metaphorically refer to persons: Judges 9:8-15; Psalm
96:12, 104:16; Song of Solomon 2:3 (as we read above); Isaiah 10:19, 44:23, 55:12,
56:3; Ezekiel 17:24, 31:5, 31:9, 31:14-18; Matthew 3:10, 7:17-19, 12:33; Mark
8:24; Luke 3:9, 6:43 & 44; Jude 1:12; Revelation 2:7, 7:1 & 3, 22:2, 22:14 and
23:31. In all, no less than fifty allegorical references to persons symbolized by
the word 'tree.'
Notice that Yahweh allowed Adam and Eve the freedom to 'partake' or 'eat' freely
of "every tree of the garden." Just what other trees were there? Having
established the possibility of the tree being symbolic of a person, we find our
answer in the eighth verse of Genesis chapter two; Yahweh had planted but one
'tree' in the garden, that being Adam. Later he formed a mate for the Man, of his
very own flesh and bone, thus we might say that were now two 'trees' in the
garden. Already we see how sanctified and special the marriage bond is between a
man and woman, as Yahweh told Adam that he "shall cleave unto his wife; and they
shall be one flesh," (2:24). The observation that "they were both naked, the man
and his wife, and they were not ashamed" (v. 25) also bears importance too, as we
shall soon see.
With just these two persons (referred to as 'trees') in the garden, it seems
rather obvious that Adam and Eve were alone being referred to as 'every tree'. In
the original Hebrew, the word 'every' doesn't actually appear though. Yahweh
simply told the Man and his wife that they may 'eat' of 'the (other) tree', one
might say.
But wait, for there is another 'tree' mentioned, who was in the garden. It is
never simply referred to as a tree, but this one has a special designation: "the
tree of the knowing of good and the knowing of evil." Please make a mental note,
as this too will be an important piece of knowledge as we solve this divine
puzzle. Adam and Eve were especially forbidden from having anything to do with
this 'tree of the knowing (knowledge) of good and evil.' They were not to touch
nor eat of it.
What then does "eat" mean here? This may come as a surprise to many, but the word
"akal" means much more than our English word 'eat.' This Hebrew word, used
idiomatically has meanings much deeper than the consumption and digestion of food.
In many ancient Hebrew writings, the word was used to mean 'to gain satisfaction
from.' The application of the word "akal" in the romantic Song of Solomon carries
these same overtones of a sexual nature. An even more explicit statement in
support of this comes from the book of Proverbs, 30:20: "Such is the way of an
adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no
wickedness."
Having found these pieces of the puzzle, we begin to see a very interesting and
intriguing picture emerge. Before we take a look at our picture though, let us
jump ahead a few verses to Genesis 3:16, where we see the punishment meted out on
Eve for her sin; "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and
thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be
to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." Being a just and right Father,
Yahweh always chastises and punishes with penalties that fit the crime. The
penalties laid on Eve are clearly related to pro-creation and co-habitation. What
sin could possibly merit such punishments? Sexual sins? Why was the point made
that Eve's 'desire' or 'longing' (again, a term used with amorous overtones, as we
cannot try to ignore. The dictionary definition of "desire" is: sexual appetite,
passion; [American Heritage Dictionary, Standard Edition]) shall be toward her
husband? Was that not the original intention anyway?
Indeed, just as it was Yahweh's intention for the husband to "rule over" the wife.
But seeing as how Eve had forsaken Yahweh's order of things, Yahweh re-inforced
the seriousness of that command. Yahweh blessed Adam with a wife -- flesh of his
flesh and bone of his bones -- such that they may cleave (adhere faithfully and
fully) to one another and become one flesh. Yahweh saw that His creation needed
companionship and love, and when He saw that it was not good for a Man to be alone
(Gen. 2:18), out of His loving kindness and supreme grace, He gave the Man a
lifetime companion; one whom he would love more than anyone else in the world
(2:24, 25). The divine plan was plainly that the man and wife have desire toward
one another, unashamedly.
Now, having laid the foundation , let's see what Eve's sin was exactly. We pick up
the story in Genesis 3:1:
Now the serpent was more subtil than any (other) beast of the field which Yahweh
had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath Yahweh said, Ye shall not eat of
every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the
fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the
midst of the garden, Yahweh hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye
touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely
die: For Elohim doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be
opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil [In pagan religions, sex is
often the focal point of these abominable heathen cults. Babylonish pagan cults
all focused on sex, and phallic worship, with the belief that by engaging in
religious sexual rites -- which often included temple prostitutes, both male and
female -- the adherents to these false relgions could assume god-like qualities;
"knowing" or experiencing good and evil; the "good" in these cults being ritual
sex]. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was
pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the
fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did
eat. And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked;
and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. And they heard the
voice of Yahweh Our Father walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam
and his wife hid themselves from the presence of Yahweh amongst the trees of the
garden. (Genesis 3:1-8)
We need to know what or who this "serpent" was, who tricked Eve into disobeying
Yahweh. The word translated 'serpent' is 'nachash' , Strong's #5175. While it can
indeed mean a literal snake, and it is used to mean this in a number of other
passages, we also want to carefully recognize other metaphorical meanings of
"Nachash." When one thinks of the traits of a serpent, craftiness, trickery, and
the like quickly come to mind. Discerning that Yahweh compares other persons in
scripture to animals (throughout the Song of Solomon, for example; other animals
who are used to symbolize people include: eagles, lions, fish, bull, deer, wolf,
horse, and others) it appears that the serpent of Genesis 3 was in all reality, a
man who had the attributes of the serpent, namely he was tricky and deceptive.
This man was obviously one of the Gen. 1-created persons; moreover, he was tricker
and craftier than any other "beast of the field"
The Nachash (deceptive man) tricked Eve into...eating an apple? No. He tricked her
into partaking of (receiving pleasure or satisfaction from) the tree of knowing of
good and knowing of evil. This name though is unusual. "Tree of knowing"...knowing
what? This identical word "knowing" is used not much later in Genesis 4:1, "Adam
knew Eve his wife, and she conceived..." This is obviously much more than just
"knowing." It is cleary sexual relations that are spoken of in Genesis 4:1, and
the same meaning must be applied to the "tree of knowing." Now, gathering all of
our pieces to the first divine puzzle of Scripture, and assembling our knowledge
gained thus far, we see that:
Eve gained sexual satisfaction from (through carnal relations with) this man known
as Nachash. The "knowledge" (act of co-habitation) imparted by this deceptive and
lying man was a knowledge -- or experience -- of the first carnal sin. After
having engaged in such relations with the Nachash, Eve full well realized the
pleasure and desirability of the act (which was of course intended only and
exclusively for a man and woman brought together into a marriage relationship), so
she desired to introduce her husband to it as well.
After this experience, both the man and his wife suddenly did 'know' something:
they became ashamed of their nakedness, which they promptly tried to cover and
hide (you'll remember from Gen. 3:7 they made aprons to cover that particular
portion of their bodies). Let's pick up with the Scriptural account, in Genesis
3:9:
And Yahweh called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I
heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid
myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? [This revelation was a
result of the 'knowledge'] Hast thou eaten [gained satisfaction from] of the tree,
whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? And the man said, The woman
whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree [note that Adam simply
says 'the tree,' as the tree of which Adam 'partook' was not the forbidden one,
but his wife], and I did eat. And Yahweh said unto the woman, What is this that
thou hast done? And the woman said, The Serpent [Nachash, deceptive man] beguiled
[note this word, beguiled] me, and I did eat. And Yahweh said unto the Serpent
[Nachash], Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle,
[animals] and above every (other) beast of the field upon thy belly shalt thou go,
and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: And I will put enmity between
thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head,
and thou shalt bruise his heel. Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply
thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy
desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee., (Genesis 3:9-16).
Once Yahweh was aware of the sin Eve had committed, and then imparted to Adam (by
the way, Adam himself never directly sinned. This is not implied, literally or
figuratively, anywhere here) that same 'knowledge,' He confronted them. They were,
at this time, ashamed of their nakedness -- contrary to the perfect plan of
Yahweh. Eve's sexual relations with Nachash and subsequently with Adam brought on
this consequence, first upon the woman, then her husband.
Because of the disobedience and grave sin committed, Yahweh punished all involved.
First, He chastised Nachash. Nachash's punishment was that he would "go on his
belly all the days of his life, and eat dust." Idiomatically speaking, Nachash was
to become a vagabond, a nomad of sorts. But that wasn't the extent of his
punishment. Nachash had committed a very serious transgression, in that he
deceived Eve, and stole something from her that could never be replaced -- her
innocence and virginity. Yahweh's own special people -- whom he created especially
for fellowship with Him, and for lifelong companionship with one another -- had
been defrauded in the most vile way possible. Eve says that Nachash 'beguiled'
her. Let it be known that this Hebrew word's (asn) only possible meaning is in a
sexual context, one of seduction. (This verb, in this particular conjugation, is
used just this once in scripture.) Stealing from Eve her purity was no small
thing. The implications and catastrophic results of his deceit were unremovable,
thus his punishment -- which was designed to fit the crime -- was also inflicted
upon him and his 'seed' for all times. Verse fifteen of Genesis 3 states that for
all times there would be animosity, enmity between Nachash's 'seed' and Adam and
Eve's 'seed.'
The word for seed is indicative of the descendents of the parties involved in this
situation. It means 'progeny' or 'offspring,' and is Strong's #2233 (erz). In the
New testament, its Greek parallel is "sperma," (Strong's #4690) whose meaning
should be readily discernable. Make no doubt about it, here we are talking about
literal seedlines -- one, of Adam and Eve; the other, the progeny of Nachash (the
Serpent man).
Just as with Eve and Adam, the Nahcash-man (who was Satan incarnate) was told he
would have a seedline. Yahweh also stated that the two seedlines or groups of
people would forever be at odds, always harboring feelings of animosity toward the
other. Seeing as how one seedline was pure evil, and the other one of Yahweh, it
is only natural that such enmity would exist, as Amos 3:3 declares, "Can two walk
together, except they be agreed?" and 2 Corinthians 6:14, "What fellowship hath
righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"
You see, the Nachash -- this wicked one -- was rebellious toward Yahweh, and thus
tried to counterfeit what Yahweh had created just and good. While only Yahweh
Almighty can create, Nachash knew that he could pro-create (this is one way that
he tricked Eve into thinking she could become like Yahweh, by the ability to pro-
create) and thus he did so, which accounts for the "seed" mentioned in Genesis
3:15. Having progressed this far, if we are to have a complete understanding on
the subject, we owe it to ourselves to find out who the Nachash's progeny is,
where they are, how they came about, etc. Without this information, all of what
we've learned thus far is not totally useful. Friends, we are in the midst of
unraveling a most interesting and most important mystery of the Kingdom.
Saul was anointed to be governor over Israel (1 Sam.9:16) and was later proclaimed
king at Mizpeh (1 Sam.10:17-27). David was also commanded by YHWH (Yahweh) to be
governor (1 Sam.13:14), and this resulted in his being king. It is also recorded
of Solomon that he was governor and king (1 Chron.29:22). It is obvious that the
word ngid names the governing function of the king, and consequently both king and
governor may refer to the same man. There are a number of other interesting
instances, but these will be sufficient to show that the governor/ruler of Tyre is
most likely also the king of Tyre, merely differentiated in the poetic quality of
Ezekiel to emphasize another angle and reason for his overthrow. Neither the
arrogance, nor the wisdom of the governor of Tyre preserved him. Nor did the
luxury and his apparent flawlessness protect him as the king. The governor/ruler
of Tyre was a man, and the king of Tyre is said to be known among the peoples, and
he become ash on the ground for all to see.
Such distinctions completely remove the king from consideration, as anything other
than a man, and at the same time tends to confirm the fact, that the
governor/ruler and king in this passage are one and the same man. Other details
around the king indicate the eminence he had, and also lifts the curtain to reveal
the position YHWH (Yahweh) had given him in relation to the supreme and effective
agencies by which the globe is governed under YHWH (Yahweh)'s complete rule. The
dirge against the king of Tyre opens with a terse description: You were once a
seal-print [exemplar] of perfection, full of wisdom, perfect in beauty. This
epitomizes the glory the king had, for the king's sagacity was such that YHWH
(Yahweh) provided him with a guardian, (covering) cherub. The model is further
explained in verse fifteen, as the king's ways were blameless until iniquity came.
The ancient splendor of the city of Tyre can be judged by its ruins, and these
agree with the glory here ascribed to the king, who is also its governor/ruler.
The wisdom of the king corresponds with that of a governor/ruler, but NOT as wise
as Daniel. Was it possible to hide a secret from the governor/ruler, a man? Yes.
His understanding seemed merely to afford the acquisition of immense riches and
treasures. This banished the flawlessness from the king's ways, and the real
inwardness of the heart was then apparent. He revolted against YHWH (Yahweh) and
showed ignorance and lack of realization that all the luxury and splendor of his
position was actually due to YHWH (Yahweh)'s economy, rather than to his "manly"
ability and prowess.
The misunderstanding that the king of Tyre was the "so called anointed cherub" is
this way resolved into a matter which reveals YHWH (Yahweh)'s effective government
over the globe, and, if we follow this indication, we will receive an insight into
the fact that YHWH (Yahweh) rules supreme over creation's affairs. This requires
us to consider the 'cherubim' in order to obtain a fuller understanding of their
function in the universe and on the globe.
The solution of the problem concerning the verb destroy, abd, lies in the fact
that, divested of the pointings, it may be either first or third person, and since
considerations point out that the king of Tyre was not the cherub, then it is
fully agreeable to decide that it must be third person, and should be rendered:
"and the guardian cherub banished [or destroyed] you..." These changes bring the
references to the cherub into line with all the other cases in the Scriptures, for
Cherubs are employed to check the powers of evil and keep them within YHWH
(Yahweh)'s requirements.
YHWH (Yahweh)'s kingdom will also be His set-apart mount (Isa.11: 9). This
understanding makes the statement normal. We also understand that Tyre held a
place in relation to YHWH (Yahweh)'s ordering of His kingdom for Israel. The
nations around had their function and purpose in YHWH (Yahweh)'s government, but,
like Israel, they over stepped and violated their assigned positions and duties,
and YHWH (Yahweh) restrained them according to His counsel, and controls those
operating according to His fiat.
Probably the precious gems enumerated in verses thirteen are the stones that
flashed with fire; they were the covering emblems of the dignity of the king
Having discussed the errors concerning the king of Tyre, it is now important to
briefly consider the cherubim, especially as it has become apparent that the king
of Tyre was not a cherub. In the course of our examination, hints have been made
which really shed light on these beings, and it is hoped that these hints and
observations have prepared the ground for a fuller understanding of their reality
and position in the Scriptures. If so, then we have a reason to be thankful to
YHWH (Yahweh) that His Word instructs rather than perplexes.
In Ezekiel they are beneath the throne, while in the Unveiling (Revelation), they
are incorporated into the throne. The first mention of them in Genesis 3:24
employs them to guard the way to the tree of life, and in the holy of holies,
guardians [overshadowing] the lid of the ark containing the law, we see their zeal
and concern for YHWH (Yahweh)'s law. In the tabernacle and temple these beings are
very much in evidence, being almost a center of the service, possibly reminding of
the divine presence there, and the importance of the law and worship. In visions,
YHWH (Yahweh)'s presence seems to be indicated by the cherubim. Hezekiah realized
this when he spread the king of Assyria's letter before YHWH (Yahweh) in YHWH
(Yahweh)'s house, praying to Him who dwells between the cherubim, recognizing Him
as the Elohim of all the kingdoms of the earth (2 Kings 19:15). YHWH (Yahweh)
responds to Hezekiah's prayer, and Sennacherib was restrained.
The cherubim forward essential good and frustrate the adversaries. Like the
adversaries they are always subservient to the fiat of YHWH (Yahweh). If the
cherubim and adversaries are means of YHWH (Yahweh)'s ministry of this globes
affairs, then men like the king of Tyre are but their remote agents. Like the
adversaries, the cherubim, are executives of YHWH (Yahweh)'s rule, and should be
distinguished from the emblems used to represent them. They have flexibility in
details of form, which doubtless corresponds to the particular requirements of the
vision. When seen in vision they seem especially able to depict the glory of YHWH
(Yahweh)'s throne as it threatens judgment, or other evils.