Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2h
cpf2
k
fin
w
fin
F
0
1
1=e
p
A0
A
1=e
s2
1
Here, A is the area of the bottomsurface of the absorber without ns,
A
n
is area of the ns, L
1
is the height of the ns, h
o
is the n effec-
tiveness, h
n
is thenefciency, k
n
is thethermal conductivityof the
nmaterial, w
n
is nthickness, F
0
is theshapefactor for theradiative
heat transfer from the bottom of the absorber surface to the back
plate, e
p
and e
s2
are the emissivities of absorber surface and the back
plate, respectively, andh
cpf2
is theconvectiveheat transfer coefcient
from the absorber to air in the lower channel.
Air in lower channel
_ mc
f
w
2
dT
f2
dx
h
cpf2
K
1
_
T
p
T
f 2
_
h
cs2f2
_
T
s2
T
f 2
_
(7)
where w
2
is the width of lower channel, h
cs2f2
is the convective heat
transfer fromthe back plate to the air in the lower channel, T
f2
is the
Table 1
Values of various parameters used in the performance evaluation.
Parameter Value Parameter Value
Length of air heater 1.0 m Thickness of bottom insulation 5 cm
Width of air heater 1.0 m Absorbtivity of upper glass 0.04
Height of upper channel 10 cm Absorbtivity of superstrate 0.04
Height of lower channel 3 cm Absorbtivity of absorber 0.92
Height of n 2.5 cm Absorbtivity of photovoltaic cells 0.92
Thickness of n 0.1 cm Emissivity of upper glass 0.85
Reectance of upper glass 0.04 Emissivity of superstrate 0.85
Reectance of superstrate glass 0.04 Nominal efciency of PV cells 0.18
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1404
temperature of air in the lower channel, and other terms are
dened for Eqs. (2) and (4).
Back plate
h
rps2
K
2
_
T
p
T
s2
_
h
cs2f2
_
T
s2
T
f2
_
U
b
T
s2
T
a
(8)
where U
b
is the bottom heat transfer coefcient and T
a
is the
ambient air temperature. The relations for I
g1
, I
g2
, I
p
and I
pv
can be
written as follows:
I
g2
1 r
2
a
g2
I
t
(9)
I
g1
1 r
2
1 r
1
_
1 a
g2
_
a
g1
I
t
(10)
I
p
1 r
2
1 r
1
_
1 a
g2
__
1 a
g1
_
a
p
I
t
(11)
I
pv
1 r
2
1 r
1
_
1 a
g2
__
1 a
g1
_
a
pv
I
t
(12)
where I
g1
and I
g2
are the amount of solar irradiance absorbed by the
superstrate and the upper glass covers, respectively. Also, I
p
and I
pv
are the amounts of solar irradiance absorbed by the absorber and
photovoltaic cells, I
t
is the total solar radiation incident on the
upper glass surface, r
1
and r
2
are the reectances of the superstrate
and upper glass covers, a
g1
and a
g2
are the absorbtivities of the
superstrate and upper glass covers, and a
p
and a
pv
are the
absorbtivities of the absorber and photovoltaic cells.
By re-arranging Eqs. (1), (3), (4) and (6), expressions for T
g1
, T
g2
,
T
p
and T
s2
can be written as follows:
T
g1
A
11
A
12
T
p
A
13
T
f1
(13)
T
g2
B
11
B
12
T
p
B
13
T
f 1
(14)
T
p
C
11
C
12
T
f1
C
13
T
f2
(15)
T
s2
D
11
D
12
T
f 1
D
13
T
f 2
(16)
where
A
11
B
1
A
2
B
3
1 A
1
B
3
; A
12
B
2
1 A
1
B
3
; A
13
B
4
A
3
B
3
1 A
1
B
3
(17)
B
11
A
2
A
1
B
1
1 A
1
B
3
; B
12
A
1
B
2
1 A
1
B
3
; B
13
A
3
A
1
B
4
1 A
1
B
3
(18)
C
11
C
1
C
4
D
3
C
2
A
11
1C
4
D
1
C
2
A
12
; C
12
C
2
A
13
1C
4
D
1
C
2
A
12
;
C
13
C
3
C
4
D
2
1C
4
D
1
C
2
A
12
19
D
11
D
1
C
11
D
3
; D
12
D
1
C
12
; D
13
D
1
C
13
D
2
(20)
and
A
1
h
rg1g2
h
rg1g2
h
rg2s
h
cg2w
h
cg2f1
;
A
2
I
g2
h
rg2s
T
s
h
cg2w
T
a
h
rg1g2
h
rg2s
h
cg2w
h
cg2f1
A
3
h
cg2f
h
rg1g2
h
rg2s
h
cg2w
h
cg2f1
B
1
I
g1
h
rpg1
h
rg1g2
h
cg1f1
; B
2
h
rpg1
h
rpg1
h
rg1g2
h
cg1f1
B
3
h
rg1g2
h
rpg1
h
rg1g2
h
cg1f1
; B
4
h
cg1f1
h
rpg1
h
rg1g2
h
cg1f1
C
1
I
p
1 P I
pv
P
_
1 h
op
_
h
rpg1
K
1
h
cpf 2
K
2
h
rps2
;
C
2
h
rpg1
h
rpg1
K
1
h
cpf 2
K
2
h
rps2
C
3
K
1
h
cpf2
h
rpg1
K
1
h
cpf 2
K
2
h
rps2
;
C
4
K
2
h
rps2
h
rpg1
K
1
h
cpf 2
K
2
h
rcps2
D
1
K
2
h
rps2
K
2
h
rps2
h
cs2f2
U
b
; D
2
h
cs2f2
K
2
h
rps2
h
cs2f2
U
b
;
D
3
U
b
K
2
h
rps2
h
cs2f2
U
b
By substituting the expressions for T
g1
, T
g2
, T
p
and T
s
in Eqs. (2)
and (5), we obtain two rst order linear differential equations:
dT
f1
dx
X
1
X
2
T
f1
X
3
T
f2
(21)
dT
f2
dx
Y
1
Y
2
T
f1
Y
3
T
f2
(22)
where X
1
, X
2
, X
3
, Y
1
, Y
2
and Y
3
are constants which can be evaluated
using following relations:
X
1
w
1
_ mc
f
_
h
cg1f1
A
11
A
12
C
11
h
cg2f1
B
11
B
12
C
11
_
X
2
w
1
_ mc
f
_
h
cg1f1
A
13
A
12
C
12
1 h
cg2f1
B
13
B
12
C
12
1
_
X
3
w
1
_ mc
f
_
h
cg1f1
A
12
C
13
h
cg2f1
B
12
C
13
_
Y
1
w
2
_ mc
f
_
K
1
h
cpf2
C
11
h
cs2f2
D
11
_
Y
2
w
2
_ mc
f
_
K
1
h
cpf2
C
12
h
cs2f2
D
12
_
Y
3
w
2
_ mc
f
_
K
1
h
cpf2
C
13
1 h
cs2f2
D
13
1
_
In solving the differential equations in Eqs. (21) and (22), the
following boundary conditions are used:
At x 0; T
f 1
T
in
; at x L; T
f 1
T
f2
(23)
Here, T
in
is the temperature of air at the inlet of the upper air
channel, and L is the length of air heater. The solutions of Eqs. (21)
and (22) yield the temperatures of air as function of x in the
direction of air owin the upper and the lower channels and can be
written as
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1405
T
f1
x
1
Y
2
fN
1
Y
3
M
1
expN
1
x N
2
Y
3
M
2
expN
2
x
Y
3
S Y
1
g 24
T
f2
x M
1
expN
1
x M
2
expN
2
x S (25)
where
S
_
Y
2
X
1
X
2
Y
1
X
2
Y
3
Y
2
X
3
_
N
1
X
2
Y
3
X
2
Y
3
2
4X
3
Y
2
_
2
N
2
X
2
Y
3
X
2
Y
3
2
4X
3
Y
2
_
2
M
1
Y
3
S Y
1
Y
2
T
in
N
1
Y
3
N
2
Y
3
N
1
Y
3
M
2
The instantaneous thermal efciency of the PV/T air heater is
expressed as
h
th
_ mc
f
_
T
fo
T
fi
_
A
c
I
t
(26)
Here, T
and T
fo
are the air temperatures at the entrance of the
upper channel and the outlet of the lower channel, respectively, _ m
is the air owrate, and c
f
is the specic heat of air. The numerator of
Eq. (26) represents the quantity of thermal energy produced during
operation of the air heater, whereas the denominator represents
the amount of solar radiation incident over the upper glass cover
during corresponding period.
The electrical efciency of the photovoltaic cells can be evalu-
ated as follows [22e24]:
h
el
n
op
_
1 0:0045
_
T
pm
T
ref
__
(27)
where h
op
is the nominal efciency of the photovoltaic cell at the
reference temperature T
ref
, and h
el
is the efciency of the photo-
voltaic cell at the mean absorber temperature T
pm
. The mean
absorber temperature T
pm
is calculated by integrating T
p
(x) in the
direction of air ow and can be expressed as
T
pm
_
L
0
T
p
xdx
_
L
0
dx
(28)
The economic value of electric and thermal energy generally
differs, since electricity is high grade energy and heat at near-
environmental temperatures is low grade energy. To convert the
electrical efciency (of photovoltaic cells) to an equivalent thermal
efciency for a thermal power plant, the concept of equivalent
thermal electrical efciency is introduced [25,26], determined as
h
Eth
h
el
c
f1
(29)
Here c
f1
is the conversion factor of the thermal power plant and its
value in the most PV/T air heater analyses is taken to be between
0.35 and 0.40 [27]. In the present investigation, the value of c
f1
is
taken to be 0.38.
Therefore, the total equivalent thermal efciency of PV/T air
heater is calculated as
h
h
el
c
f 1
h
th
(30)
The radiative heat transfer coefcients used in Eqs. (1)e(6) are
evaluated [28] as follows:
h
rg1g2
s
_
T
2
g1
T
2
g2
_
_
T
g1
T
g2
_
1=e
g1
1=e
g2
1
h
rg2s
se
g2
_
T
2
g2
T
2
s
_
_
T
g2
T
s
_
h
rpg1
s
_
T
2
p
T
2
g1
_
_
T
p
T
g1
_
1=e
p
1=e
g1
1
h
rps2
s
_
T
2
p
T
2
s2
_
_
T
p
T
s2
_
1=e
p
A
0
=A1=e
s1
1
where s is the StefaneBoltzmann coefcient, e
g1
and e
g2
are the
emissivities of the superstrate and upper glass surfaces, e
p
and e
s2
are the emissivities of the absorber and the back plate, A
0
and A are
the areas of absorber with and without ns, and other terms are as
dened previously.
The wind induced heat transfer coefcient from the upper glass
cover is determined as [29]
h
cg2w
2:8 3:0v
where v is the wind speed. The forced convective heat transfer
coefcients to air in the upper channel are calculated using
a correlation derived from the data of Kays [30]. The Kays corre-
lation is applied, since the developed owis turbulent for the range
of ow rates encountered in the present investigation. The Kays
relation is written as
h
cg1f1
D
c1
k
f
h
cg2f1
D
c1
k
f
Nu
1
0:0158 Re
0:8
1
(31)
where the convective heat transfer coefcients h
cg1f1
and h
cg2f1
have identical values due to the characteristic length D
c1
. Also, Nu
1
and Re
1
are the Nusselt and Reynolds numbers for the upper
channel. The characteristic length D
c1
and Reynolds number Re
1
are
calculated as follows [29]:
D
c1
4w
1
H
1
w
1
2H
1
; Re
1
2 _ m
mw
1
2H
1
(32)
where w
1
and H
1
are the width and height of the upper channel, m is
the viscosity of air, and _ m is the air mass ow rate. The forced
M
2
_
SY
3
Y
1
Y
2
T
in
N
1
Y
3
Y
2
expN
2
L SY
3
Y
1
Y
2
SN
1
Y
3
N
2
Y
3
N
1
Y
3
Y
2
expN
1
L N
1
Y
3
N
2
Y
3
Y
2
expN
2
L
_
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1406
convective heat transfer coefcient to air in the lower channel from
the back plate is also calculated using a correlation derived fromthe
data of Kays and is written as
h
cs2f2
D
c2
k
f
Nu
2
0:0158 Re
0:8
2
(33)
The characteristic length D
c2
and Reynolds number Re
2
are
calculated using
D
c2
4w
2
H
2
w
2
2H
2
; Re
2
2 _ m
mw
2
2H
2
(34)
where w
2
and H
2
are the width and height of the lower channel,
respectively.
Malik and Buelow [31] obtained a ratio of the Nusselt numbers
for a rough surface (with ns) and a smooth surface (without ns).
This ratio can be written as
Nu
rough
Nu
2
1:101 8 10
6
Re
2
5 10
11
Re
2
2
(35)
Here, Nu
rough
is the Nusselt number for a rough surface and used for
the evaluation of the convective heat transfer coefcient h
cpf2
from the back of the absorber surface with ns to air.
The bottom heat transfer coefcient is calculated as
U
b
k
b
L
b
(36)
where k
b
and L
b
are the thermal conductivity and thickness of
bottom insulation, respectively.
4. Results and discussion
The performance of the proposed photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T)
solar air heater under steady state conditions is evaluated with and
without ns. The packing factor is taken to be 0.50 to divide the
absorber surface equally for thermal and electrical output. The
packing factor is dened as the fraction of absorber area occupied
by photovoltaic cells. The inuence is also determined of higher and
lower values of packing factor on the thermal and electrical ef-
ciencies. The mean absorber surface temperature is calculated and
is taken to be equal to the photovoltaic cell temperature, as the
incident solar irradiation and optical properties of the absorber and
photovoltaic cells are assumed identical. The values of the design
parameters and optical properties used in the calculation are given
in Table 1.
The thermal efciency, electrical efciency, total equivalent
thermal efciency and the rise in the air and cell temperatures are
illustrated in Fig. 2 for the solar PV/T systemwith and without ns.
It is noted that the extended area of the absorber of the systemwith
ns increases the heat transfer and thereby reduces the absorber/
cell temperature. The thermal and electrical efciencies are
signicantly improved by the addition of ns on the back side of the
absorber surface. Without ns, the relatively higher cell tempera-
ture reduces the thermal and the electrical efciencies. The addi-
tion of ns increases the thermal and electrical efciencies to 15.5%
and 10.5%, respectively. The performance results presented subse-
quently (see Figs. 3e12) are only for the PV/T air heater with ns.
The increase in the inlet air temperature as it passes through the
air heater and exits at the outlet (T
fo
T
T
a
)/I
t
change from 0 to 0.025
C-
m
2
/W as inlet air temperature rises from 25
C to 45
C.
The electrical efciency of the PV/T air collector as a function of
(T
T
a
)/I
t
is plotted in Fig. 11. The consistent decline in electrical
efciency with increasing values of (T
T
a
)/I
t
is attributed to high
cell temperature. The thermal (Fig. 10) and electrical (Fig. 11) ef-
ciencies decline, to about 30% and 9.5% respectively, at an air mass
owrate of 0.15 kg/s, as (T
T
a
)/I
t
increases from0 to 0.025
C-m
2
/
Fig. 6. Variation in the equivalent thermal efciency of the PV/T air heater with solar
irradiance and air mass ow rate.
Fig. 7. Variation in the photovoltaic cell temperature of the PV/T air heater with solar
irradiance and air mass ow rate.
Fig. 8. Effect of depth of channels of PV/T air heater on the equivalent thermal
efciency.
Fig. 9. Effects of depth of channels of PV/T air heater on the rise in air temperature
(T
fo
T
).
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1408
W. Also, as the air mass ow rate changes from 0.03 kg/s to 0.15 kg/
s, the increase in the electrical efciency is observed about 20% (see
Fig. 11).
After cell temperature, the packing factor P is another important
parameter that signicantly affects the electrical output of the solar
PV/T collector. The packing factor is dened as the fraction of
absorber area occupied by photovoltaic cells. The effect of varying
packing factor on the thermal, electrical and the total equivalent
thermal efciencies and the rise in air temperature is provided in
Fig. 12. As the packing factor increases from0.38 to 0.98, an increase
in electrical efciency of the cell is observed due to the reduced cell
temperature. The higher packing factor produces more electrical
energy per unit collector area and changes the equivalent thermal
efciency as per Eq. (30). As the packing factor changes (0.38e0.98)
the total equivalent thermal electrical efciency of the PV/T
collector increases about 17%. Most of this increase is attributable to
the increase in high grade electrical output per unit collector area.
For higher packing factors, more surface area of the collector is used
for the production of electrical energy and this reduces to some
extent the thermal energy from the air heater. The rise in air
temperature also reduced at higher packing factors due to the fall in
the absorber temperature.
5. Conclusions
A detailed analysis of a double-pass solar photovoltaic/thermal
(PV/T) air heater with ns is performed, highlighting the signi-
cance of design, climatic and operational parameters on the
thermal, electrical and total equivalent thermal outputs. The pres-
ence of ns in the lower air channel on the absorber surface
increases the heat transfer area to air and improves the thermal,
electrical and total equivalent thermal efciencies. The extended
n area also reduces the cell temperature considerably. An almost
linear relation between thermal efciency is observed with solar
irradiance and inlet air temperature. The electrical efciency is
signicantly affected by the cell temperature, which depends on
solar irradiance, inlet air temperature, air ow rate and packing
factor. For lower air mass ow rates and higher levels of solar
irradiance, a signicant part of the input heat is lost to the ambient
environment. The thermal characteristic curves developed for the
proposed system help to estimate the useful thermal energy
obtainable at a particular solar irradiance, inlet air temperature and
air mass ow rate. The depth of the air heater is signicant in both
channels, but the depth of the lower channel plays a more prom-
inent role in the heat transfer to air. The determined inuenced of
packing factor on the thermal, electrical and total equivalent
thermal efciencies indicate that a higher packing factor is useful
for producing more electrical output per unit collector area and also
in controlling the cell temperature, but marginally reduces thermal
output. The present investigation provides useful insights into the
thermal and electrical behaviour of a double-pass air heater with
vertical ns in the lower air channels and the relevance of ns with
absorber surface in the overall performance enhancement of PV/T
collectors.
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial support
provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada.
Nomenclature
A area of absorber (m
2
)
A
n
area of ns (m
2
)
c
f
specic heat of air (J/kg-K)
c
f1
conversion factor of the thermal power plant
D
c1
characteristic length for upper channel (m)
D
c2
characteristic length for lower channel (m)
F
0
shape factor
h heat transfer coefcient (W/m
2
-K)
H
1
height of upper channel (m)
H
2
height of lower channel (m)
I solar irradiance (W/m
2
)
k
b
thermal conductivity of bottom insulation (W/m-K)
k
n
thermal conductivity of n material (W/m-K)
L length of air heater (m)
L
1
height of n (m)
Fig. 10. Thermal characteristic curves of the proposed PV/T air heater corresponding to
various air mass ow rates.
Fig. 11. Variation of electrical efciency of PV/T air heater with inlet air temperature
and air mass ow rate.
Fig. 12. Effect of packing factor on the thermal, electrical and equivalent thermal
efciencies and the rise in the air temperature (T
fo
T
).
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1409
L
b
thickness of bottom insulation (m)
T temperature (
C)
_ m air mass ow rate (kg/s)
P packing factor
r
2
reectance of upper glass
r
2
reectance of superstrate
U bottom heat transfer coefcient (W/m
2
-K)
v wind speed (m/s)
w
1
width of upper air channel (m)
w
2
width of lower air channel (m)
w
n
n thickness
x variation of distance in the direction of L
Greek letters
a absorbtivity
e
g1
emissivity of superstrate
e
g2
emissivity of upper glass
e
p
emissivity of absorber surface
e
s2
emissivity of back plate
h
el
electrical efciency of photovoltaic cell
h
total
total equivalent thermal efciency of PV/T air heater
h
th
thermal efciency of air heater
h
o
n effectiveness
h
op
nominal efciency of photovoltaic cell
h
Eth
equivalent thermal efciency
h
n
n efciency
m viscosity of air (kg/m-s)
s StefaneBoltzmann constant (W/m
2
-K
4
)
Subscripts
a ambient
b bottom surface
cg1f1 convective superstrate to air
cg2f1 convective upper glass to air
cg2w convective upper glass to ambient
cpf2 convective absorber surface to air in lower channel
cs2f2 convective back plate to air in lower channel
el electrical
f1 air in upper channel
f2 air in lower channel
air at inlet
fo air at outlet
g1 superstrate
g2 upper glass
in inlet
p absorber surface
P packing factor
pm mean absorber temperature
ref reference temperature
pv photovoltaic module
rg1g2 radiative superstrate to upper glass
rg2s radiative upper glass to sky
rpg1 radiative absorber to superstrate
s sky
s2 back plate
th thermal
total total equivalent thermal
References
[1] M. Thirugnanasambandam, S. Iniyan, R. Goic, A review of solar thermal
technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (2010) 312e322.
[2] K. Branker, J.M. Pearce, Financial return for government support of large-scale
thin-lm solar photovoltaic manufacturing in Canada, Energy Policy 38 (2010)
4291e4303.
[3] H.M. Liou, Overview of the photovoltaic technology status and perspective
in Taiwan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (2010)
1202e1215.
[4] T.T. Chow, A review on photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar technology, Applied
Energy 87 (2010) 365e379.
[5] P.G. Charalambous, G.G. Maidment, S.A. Kalogirou, K. Yiakoumetti, Photovol-
taic thermal (PV/T) collectors: a review, Applied Thermal Engineering 27
(2007) 275e286.
[6] C.D. Ho, H.M. Yeh, T.W. Cheng, T.C. Chen, R.C. Wang, Comparative study of the
performances of four photovoltaic/thermal solar air collectors, Energy
Conversion and Management 41 (2000) 861e881.
[7] A.A. Hegazy, Parametric study of various congurations of hybrid PV/thermal
air collector: experimental validation of theoretical model, Solar Energy
Materials and Solar Cells 91 (2007) 17e28.
[8] S. Dubey, G.N. Tiwari, An improved thermal and electrical model for a solar
photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) air collector, Applied Energy 87 (2010)
2328e2339.
[9] T.T. Chow, W. He, J. Ji, Hybrid photovoltaicethermosyphon water heating
systems for residential application, Solar Energy 80 (2006) 298e306.
[10] H.P. Garg, G. Datta, B. Bandyopadhyay, A study on the effect of enhanced heat
transfer area in solar air heaters, Energy Conversion and Management 23
(1983) 43e49.
[11] A.D. Sahin, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, Thermodynamic analysis of solar photo-
voltaic cell systems, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 91 (2007)
153e159.
[12] F. Sarhaddi, S. Farahat, H. Ajam, A. Behzadmehr, A.M. Mahdavi, The inuences
of recycle on performance of bafed double-pass at-plate solar air heaters
with internal ns attached, Applied Energy 86 (2009) 1470e1478.
[13] A. Tiwari, M.S. Sodha, Industrial application of PV/T solar energy systems,
Applied Thermal Engineering 27 (2007) 1259e1270.
[14] C.H. Cox, P. Raghuraman, Design considerations for at-plate photovoltaic/
thermal collectors, Solar Energy 35 (1985) 227e241.
[15] H.P. Garg, R.S. Adhikari, Conventional hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) air
heating collectors: steady-state simulation, Renewable Energy 11 (1997)
363e385.
[16] Y. Tripanagnostopoulos, T.H. Nousia, M. Souliotis, P. Yianoulis, Hybrid
photovoltaic/thermal solar system, Solar Energy 72 (2002) 217e234.
[17] S.A. Kalogirou, Use of TRNSYS for modelling and simulation of a hybrid
PVethermal solar system for Cyprus, Renewable Energy 23 (2001)
247e260.
[18] K. Sopian, K.S. Yigit, H.T. Liu, S. Kakac, T.N. Veziroglu, Performance analysis of
photovoltaic thermal air heaters, Energy Conversion and Management 37
(1996) 1657e1670.
[19] M.Y.T. Othman, B. Yatima, K. Sopian, M.N. Abu Bakar, Performance analysis of
a double-pass photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) solar collector with CPC and ns,
Renewable Energy 30 (2005) 2005e2017.
[20] E.M.A. Alfegi, K. Sopian, M.Y.T. Othman, B.B. Yatim, Mathematical model of
double pass photovoltaic thermal air collector with ns, American Journal of
Environmental Sciences 5 (2009) 592e598.
[21] M.Y. Othman, B. Yatim, K. Sopian, M.N. Abu Bakar, Performance studies on
a nned double-pass photovoltaic-thermal (PV/T) solar collector, Desalination
209 (2007) 43e49.
[22] H.A. Zondag, D.W. de Vries, W.G.J. van Helden, R.J.C. van Zolengen,
A.A. van Steenhoven, The thermal and electrical yield of a PVethermal
collector, Solar Energy 72 (2002) 113e128.
[23] H.P. Garg, R.K. Agarwal, Some aspects of a PV/T collector/forced circulation at
plate solar water heater with solar cells, Energy Conversion and Management
36 (1995) 87e99.
[24] M.K. Gaur, G.N. Tiwari, Thermal modeling of a combined system of
photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) solar water heater, Solar Energy 82 (2008)
602e612.
[25] B.J. Huang, T.H. Lin, W.C. Hung, F.S. Sun, Performance evaluation of photo-
voltaic/thermal systems, Solar Energy 70 (2001) 443e448.
[26] A. Tiwari, M.S. Sodha, A. Chandra, J.C. Joshi, Performance evaluation of
photovoltaic thermal solar air collector for composite climate of India, Solar
Energy Materials and Solar Cells 90 (2006) 175e189.
[27] A.S. Joshi, A. Tiwari, G.N. Tiwari, I. Dincer, B.V. Reddy, Performance evaluation
of a hybrid photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) (glass-to-glass) system, International
Journal of Thermal Sciences 48 (2009) 154e164.
[28] J.P. Holman, in: Heat Transfer, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Science, New York, 2010.
[29] C.D. Ho, H.M. Yeh, R.C. Wang, Heat-transfer enhancement in double-pass at-
plate solar air heaters with recycle, Energy 30 (2005) 2796e2817.
[30] J.A. Dufe, W.A. Beckman, in: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, third ed.
John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2006.
[31] M.A.S. Malik, F.H. Buelow, Heat Transfer Characteristic of A Solar Dryer.
UNESCO Congress Sun in the Service of Mankind, Paris, France, 1973, Paper
V25.
R. Kumar, M.A. Rosen / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 1402e1410 1410