Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
of sample (n): 200 Number of qualified target (Known P&G) n=200 Gender Yes No
47 53
n=200 Age
Below $6000 $6000 - $ 9000 $9001 - $ 15,000 $15,001 - $ 30,000 Above $ 30,001
(n=139 ) Quality Apperanace Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding (n=139 ) Quality Apperanace Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding highest (1) 22 1 0 0 2 11 15
Satisfaction level of P&G's products of beauty & grooming high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5) 78 39 0 0 58 78 2 0 20 119 0 0 15 121 3 0 87 47 3 0 121 7 0 0 97 27 0 0
Important level of P&G's products of beauty & grooming highest (1) high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5) 30 88 21 0 0 8 75 56 0 0 0 11 105 23 0 5 98 36 0 0 2 87 47 3 0 9 93 35 2 0 20 102 17 0 0
(n=56 ) highest (1) Quality Apperanace Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding (n=56 ) highest (1) 3 1 0 0 6 13 16
Satisfaction level of P&G's products of health and well-being high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5) 31 22 0 0 13 39 3 0 20 36 0 0 19 27 10 0 37 13 0 0 29 14 0 0 33 7 0 0 Important level of P&G's products of health and well-being high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5)
6 0 0 1 4 0 12
28 10 10 19 29 20 23
22 37 45 36 23 36 21
0 9 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(n=5 ) highest (1) Quality Apperanace Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding (n=5 ) highest (1) Quality Apperanace Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
Satisfaction level of P&G's products of household care high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5) 2 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 Important level of P&G's products of household care high (2) medium (3) low (4) lowest (5) 2 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
y & grooming 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 0 0 0 139 139 139 139 139 139 139
Branding Location to buy Function 2 Pricing 0 Services 0 Apperanace 1 Quality 0 22 15 20 15 11
& grooming
and well-being
and well-being
0 0 0 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 0 0 0
Sample (n=200 ) Quality Appearance Services Pricing Function Location to buy Branding Others Sample (n=200 ) Very good Good Fair Disappointed Very disappointed Sample (n=200 ) Daily Once per week More than once per week Less than once per month More than once per month Sample (n=200 ) Daily Once per week More than once per week Less than once per month More than once per month Sample (n=200 ) P&G is better They are both about the same P&G is worse Sample (n=200 ) Yes No
Major factor of choosing P&G's product n % 47 23.5% 31 15.5% 2 1.0% 8 4.0% 3 1.5% 40 20.0% 69 34.5% 0 0.0% Immediate feeling of using P&G's product n % 85 42.5% 76 38.0% 33 16.5% 6 3.0% 0 0.0% The frequency of shopping for living products n % 0 0.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 36 18.0% 156 78.0% The frequency of using P&G's products n % 55 27.5% 119 59.5% 0 0.0% 26 13.0% 0 0.0% Experience of using P&G products compare to other brands n % 146 73.0% 42 21.0% 12 6.0% Continue to use P&G's product? n % 163 81.5% 18 9.0%
Missing Sample (n=200 ) Television advertisement Magazine/ newspaper Public transportation Billboards Store displays Friends and relatives Others Sample (n=200 ) Absolutely satisfied satisfied Fair Dissatisfied Absolutely dissatisfied
19
9.5%
Ways to get information of P&G's products n % 62 31.0% 12 6.0% 0 0.0% 29 14.5% 43 21.5% 54 27.0% 0 0.0% Overall satisfaction of the total experience n % 39 19.5% 125 62.5% 34 17.0% 2 1.0% 0 0.0%
G's product
Brand association
P&G's product
or living products
Brand loyalty
's products
uct?
P&G's products
Brand awareness
Customer satifaction
otal experience
(n=200 ) n Manning Watson's 7-11 Circle-K SOGO Marks & Spencer Jusco Wellcome Park 'n Shop Others (n=200 ) n Absolutely satisfied satisfied Fair Dissatisfied Absolutely dissatisfied
way of purchase P&G's products % 51 25.5% 62 31.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 5 2.5% 0 0.0% 5 2.5% 28 14.0% 41 20.5% 0 0.0% Satisfaction with the above retailer % 58 29.0% 108 54.0% 34 17.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%