There is an old story that says you can't kill a frog by dropping him into boiling water.

He reacts so quickly to the sudden heat that he jumps out of the water before he is hurt. But if you put him in cold water and then warm it up gradually he'll end up cooked without knowing it! Human nature is much the same. People are as tolerant as frogs. Take their freedom overnight and you will have an immediate revolution. But steal it from them gradually and you can paralyze an entire nation. Look at the Income Tax. It started out in 1913 sounding harmless at 1% with the lower and middle class being totally exempt. Now we are all being cooked in the same oppressive pot.

How to Disconnect from IRS

"Former IRS Commissioner Roscoe Eggar resigned in April of 1986 after publicly admitting that 35 million Americans no longer file personal income taxes!" - Financial Survival, Issue I, 1990 In 1969, an anonymous IRS agent made the following statement to a U.S. Senator: "If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the Internal Revenue Service operates on 90% bluff, the entire income tax system would collapse!" "Since 1913, the IRS has been acting like the Wizard of Oz, making loud scary noises, terrified that you might discover how puny it really is." Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party The following text is an empowering, impeccably researched report, based upon irrefutable truths and laws. It is a poignant, factual and entertaining expose of some of the Internal Revenue Service's and the Federal Reserve System's most closely guarded secrets. It is the result of seven years of intensive legal research and the combined minds of hundreds of extremely intelligent, educated and dedicated patriot groups, lawyers, paralegals, CPA's, accountants, ex-IRS agents and legal researchers across America. This work shows how we can support America prosperously, without income taxes! It also provides the proven lawful methods some have successfully used to:

Lawfully stop paying the individual income tax; Lawfully stop employer from withholding all income taxes; Lawfully exercise the right not to produce records for an IRS audit; Lawfully nullify an IRS tax assessment; and

Lawfully apply for a refund of previous income taxes paid.

Some citizens pay income tax out of a patriotic duty to support America. The abhorrent truth is that individual tax dollars do NOT support America. 100% of individual taxes are supporting a privately owned and never audited banking institution one senator has called "one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known". This is the Federal Reserve which is no more Federal than Federal Express. The fundamental premise of this report is not how to "beat the tax system" or protest the tax law. The Law, the Internal Revenue Code, the Income Tax Regulations and the supreme Court all concur: Compensation for labor, earned by an American Citizen, in any of the 50 States in a lawful occupation is not taxable! The graduated income tax is 100% voluntary for these citizens! "Our tax system is based upon voluntary assessment and payment, not upon distraint." - Supreme Court Ruling: Flora v. U.S., 362 U.S. 145. Because our Constitution is the supreme law of the land, the IRS is powerless against imposing its unapportioned graduated individual income tax on Sovereign Citizens who lawfully exert their Rights. This is the ultimate, unalterable tax loophole. It is an irrefutable fact of law. Always respond immediately and in writing to all IRS correspondence. Under the "color of law" the IRS operates under, any bill they send you is presumed to be true until you refute it. Be confidant, for the law is on your side and is irrefutable. The truth will set you free!

Hierarchy of Sovereignty
The Citizen's ultimate defense against any abusive agency of government is an exertion of the Citizen's Sovereignty or supremacy of authority. The Government has robbed us of our Sovereignty and demoted us from natural born status of Absolute Sovereign, subservient only to God, to the status of a contractual person "subject to", "taxable by" and "regulated by" the United States Government. This text is about taking back our Sovereignty and Freedom. 1. Declaration Supreme Sovereign = God. Creator of We The People and the Endower of our Rights. From the of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created certain unalienable Rights..." 2.

equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with

"We The People" = (other than God) the Absolute Sovereigns.

Creators of the Constitution of the United States of America: "We the people of the united states... do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." A Sovereign is answerable only to God and conscience. 3. the The Constitution for the United States of America = the Supreme Law of Land. Creator of government: Article I: government; Article II: government; Article III: government. From the Declaration of Independence: "That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed." 4. The legislative branch of the government: Creator of the Uniform Commercial Code through its delegated power over commerce. 5. 6. 7. The UCC: Creator of Contract law and "implied contracts"... Contract law: Creator of the Contractual Person. The Contractual Person: Creator of No One. Creator of the Judicial Branch of Creator of the Executive Branch of Creator of the Legislative Branch of

Sovereignty of the People

"There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it; All else is withheld." Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421. "Since in common usage, the term person does not include the sovereign, statutes not employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it." - United States vs. Fox, 94 U.S. 315

The form of government that our founding fathers established for us, to protect our freedom, was a Republic. Under a Constitutional Republic, the People are the Absolute Sovereigns. Webster's defines a Republic as "...a state or nation in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens..." Our Constitution, Article IV, section 4, states "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government..." In England, the King was the only Sovereign. In 1783, after the end of the Revolutionary War, a delegation lead by Ben Franklin met in Paris and signed the "Peace of Paris", commonly known as the "Treaty of Paris". In that Treaty, the King of England ceded his Sovereignty in America to the People and Citizens of the American Colonies. It is not reasonable to assume that these Citizens, who had fought a Revolutionary War to obtain their Sovereign independence and to absolve themselves of the centralized power and jurisdiction of the English Parliament and Crown, would shortly thereafter cede a comparable power and jurisdiction to the federal government. These Citizens established a nation unique in all the world, free of governmental greed, power, interference and restraint... a nation where happiness was a sacred Right and where Liberty, Freedom and Independence were fundamental and unchangeable principles! Webster's defines Freedom as "Liberation from the control of some other person or arbitrary power; liberty; independence". Webster's defines Independence as "controlling or governing oneself; self governing..." The only purpose of government, in the Constitutional Republic our founding fathers established was, according to the Declaration of Independence, "to protect the Rights of the governed!" The United States Government that We the Sovereign People created and entrusted to protect our fundamental rights, has falsely mislead us into believing that the Government is Sovereign and We The People are "persons" subject to its [United States] jurisdiction. The supreme Court has ruled that, the Rights of Sovereigns can't be taxed or regulated by the Government... In law, a "human person" is called a "natural person". The "person" referred to in Codes, unless a counter intent is evident, is a corporate or juristic entity without Rights. By creating a "legal term" for person that excluded the Sovereign, the Government has been able to create vast volumes of governmental rules and regulations, for the "person" to pay income tax, property tax, license and registration fees, business license fees, marriage license fees, dog license fees, etc. It is also this juristic (recognized at law) "person" that the government can jail as an incentive to comply with its "Codes". The Sovereign is NOT the legislative "person".

Sovereignty of the States

"Prior to the adoption of the federal Constitution, states possessed unlimited and unrestricted sovereignty and retained the same ever afterward. Upon entering the Union they retained all their original power and sovereignty, except such as was surrendered to the federal government or they were expressly prohibited from exercising by the united

States Constitution." - Blair v. Ridgely, 97 D. 218, 249. S.P. People v. Coleman. 60 D. 581. The original states were each separate, independent and proud contiguous nations who vehemently valued their freedom. They fought and died in a Revolutionary War to sever their ties as "subjects" of the King of England. As previously stated, their purpose was to establish their independence as Sovereigns. The States guarded their own Sovereign Rights, powers, jurisdiction and land. They refused to cede their newly won Sovereignty to a "federal" government and be subject to another jurisdiction! The Citizens of the States, however, thought that it would be advantageous to the "general welfare" to delegate certain limited responsibilities, such as uniform monetary creation (which was to be in gold and silver), defense and postal services to a federal government. Other than the very limited, and reclaimable cessions of powers delegated to the federal government, as specified and limited in the Constitution, the states maintained the same independent Sovereignty that they had under the Articles of Confederation.

Higher Law
"...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these Rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just power from the consent of the governed..." -from the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America.

The Common Law

"The United States adopted the Common Laws of England with the Constitution." Caldwell v. Hill, 176 S.E. 383 (1934). The Common Law originated as the unwritten law of England. It is rooted in the Magna Carta signed by King John in 1215. It limits the powers of the King and guaranteed liberties of the people. It is derived from principles rather than rules; it does not consist of absolute, inflexible rules, but rather of broad and comprehensive principles based on justice, reason, conscience, truth and common sense. This jurisprudence system is based on judicial precedent (court decisions) rather than the mass volumes of Codes and absolutist legislative enactments for the citizen subject to exclusive U.S. jurisdiction. The common law has only two solid principles upon which all law is based: 1. Do not encroach upon the rights or property of others. 2. Keep all contracts and agreements that you enter into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally.

The Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights did NOT grant us our Rights. Our Rights have existed from birth, as they were endowed by our Creator. Even if there were no Constitution, we would still have rights. Even if someone is not an American, they have inborn rights. The Declaration of Independence is merely the codification of those Rights into American law. The Bill of Rights was written, not to establish our Rights, but to prohibit the government from infringing upon those Rights. The First Amendment states that the "Congress shall make no law infringing upon our Rights." The foundation of our government and law is "respect for Rights" by each other and by the government. The law among equal Sovereigns is that "one Sovereign may not infringe upon the Rights of other Sovereigns".

The Right to Labor is Fundamental

"Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant, the right to pursue any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoyment...It has been well said that the property which every man has is his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is most sacred and inviolable... To hinder his employing...in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of the most sacred property." Butcher's Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, at 756-757. "Included in the right of personal liberty and the right of private property - partaking of the nature of each - is the right to make contracts for the acquisition of property. Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment, by which labor and other services are exchanged for money and other forms of property." Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. .1, at 14. "...The term [liberty]...denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience...The established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with, under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action..." Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 400. The evidence is conclusive that there is NO LAW within the Internal Revenue Code or Regulations that makes a Citizen of the 50 States, exercising his or her fundamental Right to labor in a common, lawful occupation, in one of the 50 States, liable for the graduated income tax.

Any such tax must be and is VOLUNTARY! Why? The awesome power restraining the IRS is our "Inalienable Rights" which were "endowed" to us by our Creator, "declared" by our Declaration of Independence and "protected" by our Constitution.

Our supreme Court has ruled that our Right to Labor in a lawful and unregulated occupation is a Fundamental Right and that Fundamental Rights cannot be taxed! Following is the "silver bullet" found buried away (and never repealed) in the original 1939 Income Tax Regulations. It is the loophole that keeps the Internal Revenue Code from being voided for reasons of unconstitutionality.
(1939) 26 CFR Section 9.22(b)-1 "Exemptions: exclusions from gross income. Certain items of income..are exempt from tax and may be excluded from gross income... (1) those items of income which are, under the Constitution, not taxable by the Federal Government. (2) those items of income which are exempt from tax on income under any Act of Congress..."

This powerful income tax regulation has not ever and cannot ever be repealed, because of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution! It is, in fact the ultimate, unalterable, impenetrable tax loophole! This Regulation exempts and excludes, from gross income, all compensation, earned by a Citizen of the 50 States, exercising his or her fundamental Right to Labor in a common, lawful occupation. This type of compensation is, under the supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution, NOT TAXABLE by the federal government! This section also creates an exclusion from federal taxation, for all property, unless such tax is equally apportioned. The supreme Court, in a decision (Pollock v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co., 158, U.S. 601, at 637 (1895)] that has never been overturned [not even by the 16th Amendment as this amendment makes no reference to direct taxes), found the Government's direct, unapportioned income tax to be unconstitutional! Compensation for labor is property. Taxation on property constitutes a direct tax. The Brushaber supreme Court ruled that income taxes are limited ONLY to indirect taxes. Therefore, the American Citizen's compensation for labor earned in the 50 States is not subject to the income tax! Also, such American's Right to maintain his existence by laboring in a common and lawful occupation is a Right and not a privilege upon which an indirect tax can be imposed. The following are supreme Court decisions that have never been overruled. This is "Precedent Law" for the Citizens of the 50 States under the Constitution and the Law. The supreme Court ruled in 1970: "Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences." Brady v. U.S. 397 U.S. 742 at 748. "... Every man has a natural right to the fruits of his own labor, as generally admitted; and no other person can rightfully deprive him of those fruits, and appropriate them against his will..." The Antelope, 23 U.S. 66, 120.

"The right to labor and to its protection from unlawful interference is a constitutional as well as a common-law right. Every man has a natural right to the fruits of his own industry." 48 Am Jur 2d, Section 2, Page 80 [American Jurisprudence 2, a compilation of overruled Court decisions]. "A State [or the United States] may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 1 at 113.

The Butchers' supreme Court decision expanded our inalienable right to pursue happiness, to include our right to pursue any lawful business that did not infringe on the rights of others. It also defined our "labor" as our most sacred "property". Therefore, a tax on labor would be a Direct Tax on property.

Gross Income Earned in the Exercise of an Inalienable Right is Exempted by Fundamental Law and is Free From Tax
Treasury Decision, Internal "Revenue Vol. 26 No. 3640, p. 769 (1924): "Gross income excludes the items of income specifically exempted by statute or fundamental law, free from tax." Title 26 (1939) Part II, Subtitle B Section 3.21-1: "Meaning of net income. The tax imposed by Title 26 of the Act is upon income. Neither income exempted by statute or fundamental law, nor expenses incurred in connection therewith, other than interest, enter into the computation of net income..." 11 Am. Jur. Constitutional Law Section 328, p 1131 - 1133, describes the "Fundamental Principles" upon which the political institutions and the social structure of America rest, is that all men have certain Rights..."which are inalienable, fundamental and inherent. These are real Rights and not mere privileges enjoyable through grace...Every man has a natural, fundamental right to the fruits of his own industry." Therefore our Rights have the following attributes: They are Inalienable. From Webster's: "Not transferable to another and not capable of being repudiated" [overturned or denied]; ... Fundamental. basic for the ... Inherent. element, "An essential part of the foundation. The primary source, a principle, rule or law that serves as the groundwork system." "Existing in someone as a permanent and inseparable quality or attribute; innate; inborn."

"Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby." 16 Am Jur 2d Section 177, late Am Jur 2d, Section 256. Section 128 IRC, Title 26 USCA: Recovery of unconstitutional federal taxes: "Income (excluding interest) attributable to... a tax imposed by the United States which has been held unconstitutional...may be excluded from gross income."

Limited Tax Power of the United States

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it, to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the People." - 10th Constitutional Amendment

"Thus, in the matter of taxation, the Constitution recognizes the two great classes of direct and indirect taxes, and lays down two rules by which their imposition must be governed, namely: the rule of apportionment as to direct taxes and the rule of uniformity as to duties, imposts and excises." Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. 158, U.S. 601, at 637 (1895). "Direct taxes bear immediately upon persons, upon possessions and enjoyments of rights. Indirect taxes are levied upon the happening of an event or an exchange." Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U.S. 41. "A tax levied upon property because of its ownership is a direct tax, whereas one levied upon property because of its use is an excise, duty or impost." Manufactures' Trust Co. vs. U.S., 32 F. Supp. 289. Following is the ONLY area where the people have ceded tax power to the federal government. From the Constitution of the United States of America, Article I, section 8: "The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises with the following restrictions: a. All "Direct" taxes must be apportioned (divided equally according to population). b. All "Indirect" taxes must be uniform. [i.e. the same percentage]. Authorities for Direct Taxation by Congress Article I; Section 2, Clause 3: "Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within the Union, according to their respective numbers..."

Article I; Section 9, Clause 4: "No Capitation [a tax imposed upon a person at a fixed rate, regardless of the taxpayer's ability to pay, occupation, assets or income] or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken." The concept of apportionment is based upon America's founding principle of "equality under the law". Apportionment means that if you pay $100 a year in taxes, I also pay $100 a year in taxes. To be lawful, federal direct taxes on property (including real and personal property) must be equally apportioned! Real property is real estate. Personal property, according to the Federal Bankruptcy Code, is personal belongings including money and earnings. Compensation, therefore, is personal property. Also, the supreme Court has ruled that our Rights are property and our labor is our most sacred and inviolable property, because it is the original foundation of all other property. If compensation for labor could be taxed, it would need to be taxed by equal apportionment. However, the supreme Court has ruled that Rights can NEVER be taxed. A charge or fee can never be imposed upon the exercise of a Right! The only taxes, Congress is authorized to impose, without apportionment are indirect taxes such as excises, duties and imposts. Income taxes can only be imposed upon "regulated revenue taxable activities" and "privileges".

Authority for Direct Taxation by Congress Article I Section 8 Cl. 1: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States." Duties and imposts are importation and exportation taxes laid by the government. "Excises are taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale and consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain [regulated] occupations and upon corporate privileges; the requirement to pay such taxes involves the exercise of privilege." Flint vs. Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107. The income tax can ONLY be imposed upon the exercise of a privilege; it may NOT be imposed upon the exercise of a Right! Therefore, the "Income Tax" is an excise tax on the "exercise of a privilege" and the amount of such tax is measured by the amount of income derived from the exercise of that "privilege". A privilege is something that can be given and taken away by the Government. If there is no privilege being exercised, there is no liability for any Income Tax.

Rights Cannot Be Converted Into Taxable Privileges

"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but the individuals Right to live and own property are natural Rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed... We believe that the conclusion is well justified that a tax laid directly upon the income of property, real or personal, may well be regarded as a tax upon the property which produces the income." Redfield v. Fisher, Oreg. Sup. Ct. 292 at 813, 817, 819. (1930). "Citizens under our Constitution and laws mean free inhabitants [not subjects]...Every citizen and freeman is endowed with certain rights and privileges, to enjoy which no written law or statute is required. These are fundamental or natural rights, recognized among all free people...That the right to...accept employment as a laborer for hire as a fundamental right is inherent in every free citizen, and is indisputable..." U.S. v. Morris, 125 F. Rept. 325, 331. "The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation is a 'personal' right, whether the 'property' in question is a welfare check, a home or a savings account. In fact a fundamental interdependence exists between the person's right to liberty and the personal right in property. Neither could have meaning without the other." Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 405 U.S. 538 (1970).

Unconstitutional Statutes are Null and Void

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Madison 5 U.S. 137, 174, 176. Marbury vs.

The ONLY reason that there is NO LAW for the Citizens of the 50 States which imposes a tax on compensation for labor earned in the 50 States, is because our Constitution bound our Congress and prohibited them from creating such a law! It is important to understand the Internal Revenue Code is NOT unconstitutional only because is DOES NOT impose such a tax. For 80 years Americans have been paying a tax, unbacked by a law that was applicable to them! This is a tax that Americans merely "assumed" they owed!

Rights the IRS Doesn't Want You to Know

"The information revealed in the preparation and filing of an income tax return is, for Fifth Amendment Analysis, the testimony of a 'witness' as that term is used herein." Garner vs. the U.S. (1976).

"There can be no question that one who files a return under oath is a witness within the meaning of the Amendment." Sullivan vs. U.S., 274 U.S. 259. This is a statement found on the front cover of the IRS Audit Manual and The Handbook For Special Agents: "Agents: The material contained in this manual is confidential in character. It must not, under any circumstances, be made available to persons outside the service..." 4th Amendment: "The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated and no Warrants shall be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." 5th Amendment: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless by a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall he be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." [Note: McCarthy v. Arndstein ruled that "The Fifth Amendment applies alike to criminal and civil proceedings."] 6th Amendment: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him, and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." From The Handbook for Special Agents, Constitutional Law, Section 342.12: "(2) The privilege against self-incrimination does not permit a taxpayer to refuse to obey a summons issued under IRC Section 7602 or a court order directing his/her appearance. He/she is required to appear and cannot use the Fifth Amendment as an excuse for failure to do so, although he/she may exercise it in connection with specific questions. [Landy v. U.S.] He/she cannot refuse to bring his/her records, but may decline to submit them for inspection on constitutional grounds. In the Vadner case, the Government moved to hold a taxpayer in contempt of court for refusal to obey a court order to produce his/her books and records. Vadner refused to submit them for inspection by the Government, basing his refusal on the Fifth Amendment. The court denied the government's motion to hold Vadner in contempt, holding that disclosure of his assets would provide a starting point for a tax evasion case." Further, the IRS Supplement published on 1/10/79, in Sections 6, states "...A summons of a taxpayers books and records for return of information is not recommended."

The courts have, however, found a minor 5th Amendment loophole. If the Citizen takes a "blanket Fifth", meaning that they say, in advance, that they want to plead "Fifth" to every question before it is asked, the Judge can overrule the 5th Amendment plea on the grounds that the defendant didn't know what the questions were going to be. Prosecutors have entrapped Citizens, in the past, by asking them if they wanted to exercise a "blanket Fifth". An enlightened Citizen answers by saying "I can't, I don't know what your questions will be." Then this patriotic Citizen can just answer each question, separately, by stating his or her Rights in the same manner he or she did with the agent. Further, Miranda vs. U.S., 424 U.S. 648 states that "The Fifth Amendment provision that the individual cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself cannot be abridged."

Exercising Rights
"Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he could refuse to produce his records to IRS agents...Who would believe the ironic truth, that the cooperative taxpayer fares much worse than the individual who relies upon his constitutional rights." U.S. vs. Dickerson, 413 F. 2d. 1111, 1969. "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many Citizens, because of respect for the law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance." U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187. Following is an example of how Citizens have successfully exercised their Rights, as protected by the Constitution, against the IRS. When the IRS requests to look at a Citizen's books and records, the enlightened Citizen simply takes control of the situation by asking the following simple questions: Do you have a properly executed Search Warrant? They never do. Can the information that you are requesting be used against me in a criminal proceeding? The agent is required to answer yes. Am I required by law to give you this information? The agent must answer no. At this point the Citizen states I wish to exert my Fourth Amendment Right to be secure in my papers and effects against an unreasonable search and seizure. I also wish to exercise my Fifth Amendment Right against compelling me to be a witness against myself. Then the Citizen politely tells the agent "Goodbye".

Be confident and never show fear. Fear attracts IRS agents like dead bodies attract vultures. The only recourse the agent then has is to summons the Citizen to bring his or her documents to court, in hopes that the black robe of the judge will intimidate the Citizen into voluntarily relinquishing their Rights. The judge has no more right to look at the personal papers of the Citizen than the IRS agent had. The Citizen can just bring his papers

to court in a box that he or she will never have to open. When the Citizen exercised his or her Rights, the judge has no choice but to dismiss. Actually, it is highly unlikely that an American Citizen would ever receive a summons. Following is a quotation from Section 363 of the IRS Handbook for Special Agents: "When a taxpayer or a witness refuses to submit requested information, all surrounding circumstances should be fully considered before a summons is issued. The likely importance of the desired information should be carefully weighed against the time and expense of obtaining it, the probability of having to institute court action, and the adverse effect on voluntary compliance, by others, if the enforcement efforts are not successful." [The IRS cannot afford to set a Court precedent that would smarten up its unwitting volunteers.]

Legal Authority for Collecting Taxes is the Legislative Congress NOT the Executive Secretary of the Treasury
Another fact about our income tax system, that makes it obvious that the Internal Revenue Code is not imposing an income tax on the Citizens of the 50 States, is that our Constitution, specifically states that "Congress shall have the power to lay and collect the taxes..." [Article 1, Section 8, C1 1, U.S. Constitution.] In a system of law such that we have in the United States of America, the lawful authority to perform an act is an essential element to the legitimacy of the law. Because the intent was fairness and protection through a "separation of powers" within the Constitution, the powers granted to Congress could not be delegated to another Branch of government. Congress was granted the power to tax because they were a body of government elected "by the people". Therefore, if people were unhappy with tax laws, they could vote the members of Congress who were responsible for such laws out of office after two years. There are two classes of Citizens in the United States, (1) Sovereign Citizens of the 50 States, under the Constitution, and (2) subject citizens born in territories over which the United States is Sovereign (i.e. Washington D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico, etc.), who are not legislated for under constitutional guidelines. The only taxing authority the Secretary of Treasury could have would be over these 'subject citizens' who are under the exclusive territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The Internal Revenue Code is "situs based" Territorial federal legislation. Citizens of the 50 States, who are not federal government employees, have no more liability for paying the federal income tax on their compensation earned in the 50 States than they would for paying the Japanese government's income tax.

What is Income?

"Gross income" is not "taxable income". "Gross income" according to the IRS is anything of value that comes in, compensation, wages, salary, tips, benefits barter exchanges, etc. minus Constitutional and statutory "exemptions and exclusions". "Taxable income" is then "Gross income" minus allowable expenses. The word "income" by itself is restricted to its TRUE meaning, as substantiated by the supreme Court. In well settled decisions, the supreme Court has ruled that the ACTUAL meaning of the word "income" is ONLY "gains and profits" severed from capital. Therefore, remuneration or compensation for labor (which is equivalent exchange) earned by private Citizens of the 50 States, is NOT "income"! [See Eisner vs. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189.]

The Bankers
"Permit me to control the currency of a nation and I care not who makes it's laws." -Baron de Rothschild. "If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before morning!" - Andrew Jackson "100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt and by Federal transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government." - President Ronald Reagan, 1984 Grace Commission Report. The great secret of bankers as once blurted out by John Houblen, the first governor of the Bank of England: "We will charge interest on money which we created out of nothing." Both the Federal Reserve and its collection agency the IRS are the corrupt offspring of legislation introduced in 1913 by Senator Nelson Aldrich (maternal grandfather to the famous Rockefellers, who are the largest beneficiaries of the Federal Reserve). Contrary to popular belief, the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express. It is privately owned by a group of primarily European bankers and has never been audited. These bankers have as much respect for the American people as a chess player has for the pawns in his game. Their ultimate agenda is one world economic control. The government has given this elitist corporation the absurd power to purchase currency directly from the U.S. Bureau of Engraving for 2-1/2 cents per note (whether the note is a $1 or a $100 bill!). They also have the power to create bank credit with the stroke of a finger. The Federal Reserve then uses this virtually free money to purchase U.S. Treasury Bonds. We the People are then purportedly obligated to pay off these bonds with interest at full face value with tax dollars! Who cashes your IRS checks? The Federal reserve. What are you buying? Your tax dollars are merely credited toward U.S. Interest "obligations" on the massively compounding federal debt. Your tax dollars are "buying" absolutely NOTHING of value for America! "Paid at PAR" means the Fed is converting our unbacked paper currency into

GOLD on the International Monetary Fund (also their creation)! Where did they get the gold? From We the People!

The Fearless Congressman Luis T. McFadden

Congressman McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee for over ten years was the foremost Congressional authority on the Fed. This brave and noble Congressman stood up before Congress and fearlessly challenged the power of the Federal Reserve in the following powerful speech given on June 10, 1932. McFadden died under mysterious circumstances. "Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks, which have cheated the government and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law, by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it! Some people think the Federal Reserve banks are United States government institutions. They are not! They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers; and the rich and predatory money lenders. Among those financial pirates, there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and wheedling us into granting new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime. These 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this Country by bankers who came here from Europe and repaid our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money. They planned and instigated the Russian Revolution... In 1912, the National Monetary Association, under the chairmanship of the late Senator Nelson Aldrich, presented a vicious bill called the National Reserve Association Bill. This is usually spoken of as the Aldrich bill although Aldrich did not write the bill. He was the tool, if not the accomplice, of the European bankers who, for nearly 20 years, had been scheming to set up a central bank in America. In 1912 they were spending and are continuing to spend vast sums of money to accomplish their purpose. We were opposed to the Aldrich plan for a central bank. The men who ruled the Democratic Party then promised the people that if they were returned to power there would

be no central bank established here while they held the reigns of government. Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of sinister Wall Street figures established, here in our free country, the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the "King's bank" to control us from the top downward, and to shackle us from the cradle to the grave...Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers, but the truth is...the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations!..."

Who Owns the Federal Reserve?

In 1913, Congress sank America into eternal debt by giving the power to issue currency and control the American economic system to the Federal Reserve Bank. Originally, there were reportedly 203,053 shares of Federal Reserve stock, of which approximately 65% were owned by foreigners and approximately 35% (72,000 shares) were owned as follows: Rockefeller's National City Bank: shares Chase National (currently Chase Manhattan, owned by David Rockefeller): 6,000 shares National Bank of Commerce (now known as Morgan Guaranty Trust): shares Morgan's First National Bank: 15,000 shares Although The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 provided that the names of the owner banks be kept a secret, R.E. McMaster, publisher of the newsletter, The Reaper, discovered, through confidential Swiss banking connections, that the following banks have controlling stock interest in the Federal Reserve: The Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin, Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris, Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy, Warburg Banks of Hamburg and Amsterdam, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Lehman Brothers Bank of New York, Goldman Sachs Bank of New York and the Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (controlled by the Rockefellers). In his impeccably researched book Secrets of the Federal Reserve, Eustace Mullins states: "Because the Federal Reserve Bank of New York sets interest rates and controls the daily supply and price of currency throughout America, the owners of that bank are the real directors of the entire system. These shareholders have controlled our political and economic destinies since 1913." Those shareholders making up Mullins list are almost identical to the one compiled by the Swiss banking source: The Rothschilds, Lazard Freres (Eugene Mayer), Israel Sieff, Kuhn Loeb Company, Warburg Company, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and the Rockefeller family and J.P. Morgan interests. 21,000 30,000

The Invisible Government

The day before the Federal Reserve Act passed, Congressman Charles Linberg said "The money trust deliberately caused the 1907 money panic and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission which led to the ultimate creation of the Federal Reserve. This Federal Reserve Act establishes the most gigantic monetary trust on earth. When the President signs the bill, he invisible government of the monetary powers will be legalized. The people must make a declaration of independence to relieve ourselves from the monetary powers, by taking control of Congress. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill. The caucus and the party bosses have again operated and prevented the people from getting the benefit of their own government!" How did the monetary powers manipulate the passage of the Federal Reserve Act? Senator Nelson Aldrich was named as Chairman of the Monetary Commission, which was like having the cat design the canary cage. Aldrich was the maternal grandfather of the five Rockefeller brothers through the marriage of his daughter, Abby Greene Aldrich to John David Rockefeller, Jr. The Rockefellers have been the largest beneficiaries of the Federal Reserve. The chief architect of the plan was Paul Warburg, a Rothschild agent who was salaried at $500,000 a year.

Another member of the Monetary Commission was Jacob Schiff of Kuhn-Loeb & Co., who helped finance the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia with a $20 million contribution. On November 22, 1910, Aldrich and the rest of the Monetary Commission met at the private hunting club of J.P. Morgan on Jekyll Island, Georgia to draft a bill that would put the economic future of the United States into the hands of a few private Money Powers. The original bill was the highly unpopular Owen-Glass Bill. The name of the bill was later, deceptively, changed to the Federal Reserve Act. The timing of the vote for the Federal Reserve Act was engineered by its promoters. It was passed hastily in an effort to break for Christmas, on December 13, 1913, while the majority of the opposing Congressmen were on vacation. Then, when elected, the banker financed Woodrow Wilson, immediately signed the Act. Within months of starting the Federal Reserve, individual Income Taxes were created to pay for this new banker's interest expense. The taxes of American Citizens pay the interest on all new "debt certificate" currency and credit issued by the Federal Reserve.

Money from Nothing

Ask yourself this question: "If you were given a monetary printing press and a legal contract to print and issue all of the money you would ever need to run your household at no cost to you, would you, instead, give that printing press and contract to a banker and agree to borrow your money from him, to be repaid in full with interest?" I don't think so. The government of the United States of America has done exactly that. The most awesome power America has, is the power to create, using as collateral, the future productivity of its

Citizens, all of the currency and credit we would ever need to run our government, prosperously! Instead, America has legislated away this priceless power of monetary creation to a group of, primarily foreign, self-serving bankers! According to the Supreme Court, this transfer of power is in direct violation of the law. "Congress may not abdicate or transfer to others its legitimate functions." - Schecter Poultry v. U.S., 29 U.S. 837, 842 (1935). Following is a simplified explanation of the inane method in which currency and credit is currently created in the United States. This system benefits a few elitists at an exorbitant cost to We the People. Let's say, for example, that to run the country for a year, the United States needs $300 billion in credit and $100 million in currency: 1. currency. 2. Engraving 3. print 4. The Federal Reserve System pays the U.S. Bureau of Printing and $20.60 per 1,000 bills (regardless of denomination) it prints! Next, the U.S. orders the same U.S. Bureau of Printing and Engraving to $300,100,000,000 worth of U.S. Treasury Bonds. The U.S. authorizes the U.S. Bureau of Printing and Engraving at the U.S. Treasury to print $100 million in Federal Reserve Notes, as

The Federal Reserve then purchases $100 million of U.S. Treasury Bonds (redeemable at full face value plus interest) from the United States. To pay for these, the Fed uses the Federal Reserve notes that they just purchased for 21/2 cents per bill! Next the Federal Reserve purchases the other $300 billion in U.S. Bonds with a simple ten second computer entry that transfers $300 billion worth of "credit" into the United States' Treasury account. Where did the Federal Reserve System get that $300 billion? It created it from NOTHING! No gold, no silver. The greatest majority of its assets are U.S. Treasury Bonds! Cost to We The People: interest; Cost to the Federal Reserve: $300,100,000,000 + continually compounding about $26,000.

The Inept Federal Debt

The Federal Reserve has driven America to the verge of complete bankruptcy. The total federal debt, accumulated in the first 200 years of our country's history, was one trillion dollars. In the first 14 years since Reagan took office, the federal debt has increased by another 3-1/2 trillion dollars!

One would assume, if the United States government took 14 years to spend three times as much as all previous administrations spent in the first 200 years of our nation's history, that the quality of American life and the wealth of the country would be magnificently improved. The opposite is true. What do Americans in 1994 have to show for the latest nearly $4 trillion dollars of debt, a debt the American people and our descendants are liable for paying? NOTHING, but a recession, record unemployment, dramatically increased homelessness, rapidly increasing home foreclosures (up 70% in 1992) and an unprecedented number of bankruptcies! The federal debt is currently growing by $1 billion every day. In less than five years, the federal debt will have grown beyond our ability to pay, just the interest, through taxation!!!

Where's Our Lawful Money?

"No State shall...coin money; emit bills of credit; make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts..." Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Cl. 1. The responsibility of coining this gold and silver money was ceded to Congress in our Constitution; Article I; Section 8 Cl. 5: "The Congress shall have the power...To coin money and regulate the value thereof..." Because the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, nothing but gold or silver money is "lawful" money for the 50 States. Federal Reserve Notes are debt instruments. They are not lawful money.

Where's our GOLD?

The artificially engineered Great Depression and a desperate nation, paved the way for acceptance of the new socialistically oriented governmental policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. FDR was a shrewd banker himself. In the 1920's he made a considerable amount of money by floating millions of dollars in worthless German bonds. On March 4, 1933 [48 Stat., 2,12 U.S.C. 248(n)] FDR seized all of America's gold through a proclamation of a national emergency! He threatened all hoarders with imprisonment, stopped the minting of gold coin and turned all of our nation's gold over to the private Federal Reserve! This was a blatant violation of our Law which states "No emergency justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision." -Am. Jur., 2nd Ed., Section 71-72.

Where's our SILVER?

LBJ's Big Lie (1964, the year before all silver coins were no longer minted): "Some have asked whether silver coins will disappear. The answer is definitely NO! Our present coins won't disappear and they won't even become rarities...If anybody has any idea of hoarding silver coins, let me say this, the Treasury has a lot of silver on hand, and it can be, and it will be used to keep the price of silver in line with its value in our present silver coin. There will be no profit in hoarding them out of circulation for the value of their silver content." The Coinage Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 254, 31 U.S.C. 391) discontinued silver coinage. The Act of June 24, 1967 (81 Stat.77) discontinued the redemption of silver certificates, after a one year grace period. We no longer have coins. We have TOKENS. Value of silver coins minted before 1964 compared to the value of copper clad tokens minted after 1964 Average current intrinsic value of silver coins minted prior to 1964 Dollar Half Dollar Quarter Dime $5.10 $2.55 $1.25 51 cents 1 cent 1/4 cent Current intrinsic value of nickel-copper coins minted after 1964 4 cents 2 cents

Fractional Reserve Banking Scheme

This scam was refined over the years to become America's current banking system. This is a simplified version of how it works with a 10% reserve requirement (requirements fluctuate, usually between 5% and 20%.): 1. Depositors place a total of $1,000,000 in the First National Hobokan Bank.

The bank only has to maintain a reserve of 10% of that amount ($100,000). It's assumed not more than 10% of the money in the bank would be demanded on any given day. 3. the The remaining $900,000 is then loaned out with interest. At 10% interest, bank would earn $90,000 on money that didn't belong to them!

2.

4. Assuming the person(s) who borrows the $900,000 deposits the money back in the same bank, 10% ($90,000) of that amount will then act as a "reserve" and the remaining 90% or $810,000 can be loaned out again! At 10% interest the bank would earn an additional $81,000 on money that they don't own! This process is repeated over and over again.

Why Has the Media Remained So Silent?

It only requires 5% ownership to significantly influence the media. Rockefeller is one of the original shareholders in the Federal Reserve. In July 1968, the House Banking Subcommittee reported that Rockefeller, through Chase Manhattan Bank, controlled 5.9% of the stock in CBS, and the bank had gained interlocking directorates with ABC. In 1974, Congress issued a report stating that Chase Manhattan Bank's stake in CBS rose 14.1% and in NBC rose to 4.5% (through RCA, the parent company of NBC). The same report said that the Chase Manhattan bank held stock in 28 broadcasting firms. After this report, the Chase Manhattan Bank obtained 6.7% of ABC. Because of their pattern of the gradual acquisition of more and more stock, today the percentage is probably much greater. Rockefeller also controls the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Nearly every major newscaster belongs to this Council. The CFR controls many major newspapers and magazines. By controlling the media you control public opinion. In 1953, John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff of the New York Times, was asked to give a toast to the independent press, before the New York Press Club. It is obvious that he believed that the concept of an "independent press" was a farce that he no longer wished to be a party to. Following is a quote from this monumentally revealing toast: "There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of the paper, before 24 hours my occupation would be gone. The business of journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and is race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it.

What folly is this, toasting to an independent press? We are the tools and vassal of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

A Sovereign, Debt-Free Economic System

1. 2. Congress proposes a $300,100,000,000 budget, requiring $100 million in currency. This budget is voted on and approved by the Congressional Representatives of the People.

3. The Bureau of printing and Engraving for the United States of America prints and issues $100 million in "Currency for the united States of America" at a cost of 21/2 cents per bill. 4. The Treasury of the United States of America puts $300 billion in credit and $100 million in currency into circulation in exactly the same manner as the federal reserve! Our government is merely providing the up-front capital to finance the future productivity of the American People. it is this "productivity" that would give the currency and credit its value! 5. and 6. The People, who are the basis of the backing of the funding, accept this currency credit as payment of their labor, products, services, technology, etc.

There is no longer a compounding federal debt and no longer a need for taxing the income of American Citizens, who will then have more expendable income to improve their quality of life. 7. The people buy more products, more jobs are created, the economy is stimulated and the ECONOMY BOOMS! Cost to We The People: Absolutely 0!

Lincoln Defied the Bankers

When the Civil War was instigated, the Union originally looked to the European bankers to loan them money to finance the war. Thinking they had Lincoln at their mercy, they overstepped themselves by demanding 24% to 36% interest. This was Lincoln's opinion of bankers: "The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe."

In Acts of February 25 and March 4, 1862, Abraham Lincoln persuaded Congress to authorize the U.S. Treasury to issue $450 million in United States Notes (currency) to finance the Civil War. These issues of currency were full legal tender and debt-free and interest-free. Because of the green ink used on the back of these bills, they were called "greenbacks". Lincoln not only freed Black Americans from human slavery, he temporarily freed all Americans from monetary slavery! After the Congress passed this powerful law, Lincoln said this: "We have given the People of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had, their own currency to pay their own debts." John Wilkes Booth was a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle which was controlled by the bankers. Bismarck made the following comments about the death of Lincoln: "The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization." The end of the greenback came soon after President Lincoln's assassination.

John F. Kennedy's Greatest Profile of Courage

We have all heard the coincidences surrounding the lives of Kennedy and Lincoln. Here's one we didn't learn about in our government schools: Interestingly, JFK, on June 4, 1963, via Executive Order 11110, authorized the issuance of $4 billion in debt-free, unborrowed United States Notes! These would have been United States Silver Certificates, "redeemable in silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates and to further coin standard silver dollars..." After Kennedy's assassination, one of the first Executive Orders of Lyndon B. Johnson was to rescind Kennedy's Executive Order and have the silver certificates that had been printed destroyed. Further, serving as the voice of the Federal Reserve, Johnson told the American public that "silver had become too valuable to be used as money." [What?!] On July 23, 1965, in an Act as unlawful as FDR's gold robbery, Johnson signed a bill authorizing the issuance of copper clad coins to replace silver coins and abolished all silver certificates!

The Two United States

One Nation Under God, The Other Nation Under Fraud In 1945, the supreme Court, in Hooven and Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, affirmed that there are two (2) distinctly different United States with two opposite forms of governments. Both united States have the same Congress. This supreme Court case officially defined the two separate and distinct meanings of the term "United States". Federal United States means the collective names of the 50 sovereign states of the union

which are united by and under the Constitution. National United States designates the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends (i.e. Washington D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico, etc.). The Federal government legislates for the 50 States, BUT ONLY in those matters We the People have specifically delegated to it by our Constitution! The National United States Government [which is foreign to the 50 sovereign states] legislates for those territories and possessions without Constitutional restrictions. It is imperative to distinguish between the two, otherwise a Citizen of the 50 sovereign states may unwittingly acquiesce to legislation that is not applicable to them and unintentionally waive their rights. When referring to this [National] United States, the Internal Revenue Code, usus the term "within" the United States. When referring to the 50 sovereign states, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term "without" the United States.

There are Two Californias Too

Just as there are two United States, there are also two of every state in the Union! There is the actual state and the juristic corporate State. For example, the State of California is NOT the same as California, or California Republic. The State of California is a corporate entity or "body politic". The State of California does not have Citizens. It has "franchisee subjects" under its exclusive jurisdiction and regulatory control. The jurisdiction of the State of California, like the corporate United States, is "territorial" and extends ONLY to those under the Sovereignty of the State Corporation. Its jurisdiction does not include Sovereign Citizens of California. California is NOT the State of California. California has Sovereign natural Citizens under the Constitution and under the law (the common law, NOT the Codes). If you were born or are domiciled in California, you would be a Citizen of California and NOT a citizen of the State of California (there is no such status, there are, however, 'residents' of the State of California). Why would the government want to confuse us like that? You guessed it, franchisees and residents can be taxed and regulated and Sovereign Citizens cannot! And Good News! The massive volumes of legislation and Codes created for the juristic "persons", "residents" and "franchisees" of the [National or District] United States and "the State of" are not mandatory laws for the Sovereign Citizens of the 50 states! The presumption of law is that ALL federal legislation is territorially limited to include ONLY the District of Columbia, and territories under the "sovereignty of" and "subject to the jurisdiction of" the United States, unless a counter intent to include the 50 states is specifically stated.

Judicial Jurisdiction

Because of the dual nature of the government, being in the wrong jurisdiction can mean an unintentional waiver of certain Rights and Constitutional protections. Therefore, jurisdiction is an extremely important issue. By challenging jurisdiction, the American Citizen of the 50 states can remove themselves from the erroneous territorial jurisdiction of the corporate United States Government. Judicial Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear and decide an action and the authority to prosecute. Before a court can act, it must have jurisdiction over both the person and the subject matter. If either is wanting, the court is without jurisdiction. "No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction." Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768. The major reason Citizens of the 50 states have been punished for laws that were applicable to them, is because they did not challenge jurisdiction. They were, therefore, "presumed" to be citizens subject to the territorial jurisdiction of the United States Government. In all administrative hearing and courtroom activities, including pretrial hearings, the Sovereign American should always insist that the proceedings are recorded. Then if "Proof of Jurisdiction" is not included on the record, the matter can be overturned if necessary. Challenging jurisdiction is done by demanding written legal FACTS from the agency asserting their jurisdiction over the subject matter and you. This is a Statute or Regulation. A Code without an implementing Regulation applicable to you, does not establish jurisdiction. Also, you as a Sovereign Citizen of the 50 states must be named the particular Citizen subject to such jurisdiction. Following is an example of a brilliant woman, who is a professor in a Southern California University, who used supreme Court decisions to successfully refute the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service. From Case No. CR 81-364 AWT, December 11, 1981; United States of America, Plaintiff vs. Gail Sandocki, Defendant: "PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gail Sanocki, who is improperly designated as defendant in the above entitled matter, will move for an order [to dismiss] ... ... 4) Defendant's jurisdictional objection that the indictment does not charge an offense is limited to a legal analysis... It requires that the indictment be carefully scrutinized in order to separate its mere conclusions of law from its improperly pleaded facts. Such statements as "gross income", "taxable income", "obligated to pay" and "required by law" are mere conclusions of law, and stripped of these legal conclusions, the indictment does not state facts charging an offense. This requires a hearing as to the nature of the evidence presented to the grand jury. The question in this case is not whether the defendant understands the charges, but rather does court appointed advisor understand defendant's right to challenge the indictment. If the government has no competent evidence which would support a legal conclusion that

defendant had a "gross income" or "taxable income", or was "obligated to pay", or was "required by law", then it has no right to hold her for trial. Defendant's jurisdictional objection additionally involve the fact that she is not within the purview of the Internal Revenue Code much less within the purview of Sections 7201 and 7203, which appear in the indictment. For any competent attorney to understand this jurisdictional objection, he must first be thoroughly familiar with the Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1; Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107. Brushaber and Stanton held that the Sixteenth Amendment, as correctly interpreted, and the "income" tax are constitutional because they are restricted to the classification of indirect taxes. Flint instructs that indirect taxes are never upon any kind of property, money or otherwise, but only upon taxable activities, in which the resulting income is merely referred to for the purpose of measuring the tax on the taxable activity. "Income" taxes are only named such because the income connected with the taxable activity is simply and conveniently used as the standard by which the tax upon said activity is measured. Of course, under the Internal Revenue Code, an activity must be taxable for revenue purposes, as opposed to strictly regulatory purposes..." Sanocki's case was dismissed on December 29, 1981: "Pursuant to Rule 48 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and by leave of court endorsed hereon, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California hereby dismisses WITHOUT PREJUDICE the indictment in the within captioned proceeding as to defendant Gail Sanocki and moves the Court for an Order exonerating the bond of the defendant." A Citizen who truly understands the law will always challenge jurisdiction prior to pleading, and will never enter a plea in a federal court until the government has proved its jurisdiction.

Internal Revenue Code Words

Using "common usage" meanings, the Internal Revenue Code would be blatantly unconstitutional. However, by changing the meaning of words, the Code and its implementing Regulations do NOT impose a tax on compensation for labor earned by American Citizens in the 50 states. IRS capitalizes State, when referring to the Territorial States and lower cases the 's' for the sovereign states. Employee [3401(c)]: "For purposes of this chapter, the term employee includes an officer, employee or elected official of the United States, a State or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term employee also includes an officer of a corporation."

Wages [3401(a)]: "For the purposes of this chapter [Chapter 24, Collection of Income Tax at Source on Wages], the term "wages" means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for services performed by an employee." Taxpayer [7701(a)(14)]: "Any person subject to any internal revenue tax." Person [7343]: "..includes an officer or employee of a corporation or member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee or member is under a duty to perform the act in which the violation occurs." WITHIN the United States: "Within the boundaries of territories belonging to the United States. (DOMESTIC). WITHOUT the United States: "In one of the 50 states or in an international country (FOREIGN). California is a foreign country in the Internal Revenue Code! If you were born and live in any of the 50 states, you are a "NONRESIDENT ALIEN" [7701(b)(1)(B)] in the Internal Revenue Code! Compensation Earned, in the 50 states, by Nonresident Alien Individuals Who are NOT Federal Government Employees is Exempt from the Subtitle A, Section 1 Graduated Income Tax.

Stopping Withholding and Unvolunteering from the Graduated Income Tax

The following forms will stop employer withholding and notify IRS of a Sovereign American Citizen's exemption and exclusion from the graduated income tax: "In Lieu of W-4 Form" W-8 Form Par.404.104(g).] Certificate of Citizenship and Domicile [Pursuant to 8 Fed. Register page 12266, Claim of an Exemption and Exclusion from Gross Income (with Memorandums) Revocation of all previous W-4 and 1040 Forms The first three documents should be given to the employer. There is also a letter for the employer to send to the IRS with an Affidavit requiring the IRS to provide evidence to refute your documentation and cite their authority. When the IRS does not [and cannot] sign and return this, the employer is under no legal obligation to withhold. The last three documents should be mailed to the IRS, via registered mail, return receipt requested to the addresses on the top and bottom of the forms. If you have filed the proper documentation and the IRS has not signed an affidavit under the penalty of perjury refuting your claims, and the employer continues to withhold your compensation, without lawful authority, you as a Citizen under the Constitution and the Law, have legal grounds to sue him or her in a Court of Law for theft and conversion of

your property! The IRS will NOT provide any immunity or defense for the employer faced with such charges. If your employer doubts this, again have him or her request written verification from the IRS, signed under the penalty of perjury, that the IRS will provide immunity for him or her in any suit brought about by you. They cannot and will not provide such a document. They may, however, try to bluff the employer over the telephone. Keep everything in writing. If all else fails and the employer continues to unlawfully withhold, after you have filed the proper documentation, you can just apply for a refund of all withholding at the end of the year. The General Instructions for the W-8 Form states: "If backup withholding occurs, an exempt foreign person who is a nonresident alien individual may get a refund by filing Form 1040 NR, U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return. Mail it to: Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255, even if filing is not otherwise required." Do NOT file a standard W-4 Form, Exempt. That form is ONLY for citizens of the [District] United States subject to its jurisdiction. You can be penalized $500 for filing such a statement. Also, if you are requesting a Refund for withholding from previous years, do not use a 1040NR Form. That is the improper form, and again, you'll be fined a $500 frivolous form penalty. The proper form, according to the IRC and Regulations is the 1040X Form. This is because you are "amending" previous 1040 Forms.

If There Is No Law, Why Do People Go To Jail?

"All persons are presumed to know the law. If any person acts under any unconstitutional statute, he does so at his own peril. He must take the consequences." 16 Am. Jur. 177, 178. Our federal government operated in a bizarre world alien and opposite that of the 50 states. The federal judicial system operates under commercial and admiralty law. This is an Alice in Wonderland legal system where "a word means just what I want it to mean!" (Lewis Carroll). Many people have lost their property and have gone to jail, not because they broke the law, but because they did not understand the proper legal procedure for refuting the false "presumptions" of the IRS.

Presumptive Evidence and the Courts

In a typical trial, the IRS will produce the Citizen's W-4 and 1040 Tax Returns, usually for the past three years. After verification that these returns were filed and received at the regional service center, the IRS will move the court to introduce these exhibits into evidence, and thereby establish the fact of their existence. When the person acknowledges, on the witness stand, that these 1040 forms bear his signature, he will confirm a confessed liability. W-4 Forms and 1040 Forms are considered by the courts to be prima facie evidence that the individual was subject to the Title 1 Graduated Income Tax, because these forms are only applicable to such taxpayers. Under the Laws of Presumption unrefuted lies are

accepted as truth. If prima facie evidence is not contradicted, it will be accepted by the court as fact. In order that W-4 and 1040 Forms are not accepted as prima facie evidence, and so that a Citizen of the 50 states is not presumed to be a resident under the Sovereignty of the United States, such a Citizen should submit a signed statement, under the penalty of perjury, under the Laws of the United States of America, prior to the trial, affirming the FACT that they are NOT subjects of the graduated income tax. At the same as this is filed, before the Tax Forms are entered as evidence. the Citizen should request a "Pre-Trial Evidentiary Hearing" and revert the "Burden of Proof" back to the government to produce the evidence or law upon which they relied, that defined the offense, and defined the Sovereign Citizen of the 50 states as the "person" liable for paying the graduated income tax and filing a 1040 Form, for Compensation for labor earned in the 50 states, outside of federal territories and enclaves. The average lawyer and judge assume that there is such a law (because their government education did not teach them otherwise). However, not one judge or attorney could cite it to you! it is only when no evidence can be produced, substantiating such a law, that its nonexistence becomes obvious! Without prima facie evidence, there is no subject matter jurisdiction to hold a Citizen for trial. A Citizen of one of the 50 states domiciled and earning a living in any of the 50 states does not belong in a federal court. They should use Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12b to file a "Motion for Dismissal" for (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and (2) lack of jurisdiction over their person, prior to the trial.

State Income Tax

Just as there are two United States, there are also two of every state. Your fundamental Right to Labor cannot be taxed by the State government, the County government or the City government anymore than it can be taxed by the federal government. Section 43401(f) of the IRC states "The requirements for a complete exemption from state wage withholding are the same as the federal requirements."

Getting Previous Income Taxes Refunded

Although the statute of limitations for filing of refunds in the Internal Revenue Code is three years, there is no statute of limitations for fraud. Following is the proper procedure for getting a refund of the past three years income taxes: The IRS Rules require that all Amended Returns for previous income taxes paid, MUST be filed on a 1040X Form. The line saying "taxable income" should be replaced with "NonTaxable Compensation" with a cite of Eisner vs. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 as the authority. This is the lawful, real definition of "income". Also the Penalty of Perjury clause should be changed to reflect the fact the document was signed "without" the United States.

As a harassment technique, the IRS may threaten to audit the Returns for the three years that are being amended. They have NO AUTHORITY to do so because the 1040X Amended Returns nullify and supersede the previous returns. Therefore, the IRS has no subject matter to audit. They must first provide a determination (based upon the law) disallowing the 1040X Returns. It is impossible for the IRS to disallow the claim because it is based upon "income" as lawfully defined and confirmed by the supreme Court. If a Citizen filed a W-4 Form, refunds for federal income taxes withheld for the current year's nontaxable compensation, should be filed for on a regular 1040 Form and filled out in the same manner as explained for the 1040X. If a Citizen filed a W-8 Form, and the employer continued to withhold from nontaxable compensation, he or she should, according to the instructions on the W-8 Form, file for a return of all federal income taxes withheld for the current year on a 1040NR Form. The ONLY types of income needed to be included on the 1040NR Form is income earned as a federal government employee and income earned from United States sources as previously defined. If a Citizen filed a W-8 Form and had nothing withheld, and earned no wages as a federal government employee and received no income from United States sources, he or she would not be required to file any type of return!

Justice
The IRS is constantly misapplying the law and then putting the burden of proof on the Citizen to prove them wrong. The majority of Citizens simply do not have the financial resources or legal background to take on the Government. The ones who do usually lose their case on a legal technicality or because the Government broke the law and then erroneously invoked Sovereign Immunity. This is not justice. it is monarchy under the "Color of the law". According to Barron's Dictionary of legal terms: "An action under 'color of law' has the apparent authority of law, but is actually 'contrary' to the law". Citizens who hire attorneys find that they have been trained in Government schools in matters of "procedure and form" but not Law. Attorneys are told in law school that they will learn Law as they practice it. Also, an attorney's first loyalty is to the Court and not to the client! The majority of attorneys and judges just "Assume" there must be a law requiring a Citizen to pay the income tax, although not one could site that nonexistent law to you. The judge was previously an attorney. The first clause in the preamble to the Constitution, which Government officials are sworn to uphold, is to "establish justice". TRUE JUSTICE CAN ONLY BE BASED ON TRUTH. There can be no justice as long as 'Rules of Presumption' such as "red is green" are allowed to be entered into judicial records as Facts! There can be no justice when a Citizen who broke no law goes to jail simply because he did not know the proper legal

procedure to refute an erroneous presumption. Probably less than 2% of Government officials, lawyers, CPA's, judges and employees are aware of the laws documented in this book. These uneducated agents will be the first to admit that they "do not know the law", yet they are quick to hand out purported "punishments of law", including property seizures and jail terms. There are multiple grades of agents within the Internal Revenue Service. Lower grade agents are kept deliberately ignorant by the upper levels in the IRS. It is these Agents who terrorize American Citizens on a daily basis! They are extortionists acting under the "color of law". Without lawful authority, these agent renegades garnish Citizen's paychecks, seize their bank accounts, and seize and sell their property without a single day in court, depriving the Citizen of the due process of law guaranteed by our Constitution! These agents are responsible for countless financially related suicides in the United States. They falsely believe that the IRS is above the law. These agents do not realize that, if they continue collection action against a Citizen, after he or she refutes the IRS' claim, and such agent does not first analyze and refute the merits of the Citizen's claim, such agent will be Personally liable for all damages to the Citizen. The Citizen can then come after the agent's property and put the agent in jail! We must educate ourselves, our families, our friends, our Congress and our judges so that they will no longer be manipulated by the money powers and the IRS. We must make the Government accountable to the Law, to justice and to their Constitutional responsibility to protect our life, liberty and happiness! Let's take America back! It is blatantly clear that both the Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Service have grossly abused the powers that we have entrusted to them. The Federal Reserve has left America's economy in a shamble and the IRS has left our people fearful. Because the Federal Reserve has contracted our money supply, to the detriment of our businesses, we are in the midst of record business closures, unemployment, property foreclosures, homelessness and bankruptcies. It is time that America took responsibility for its own destiny and created and issued its own debt-free currency and credit.

The Fed's solution to stimulating the economy is to create wars. The world bankers then fund both sides and benefit by the dramatically increased spending of the world's industrial complexes. A more intelligent and less barbaric solution for a civilized society, would be to stimulate our economy creatively, rather than destructively. There are more positive ways to jumpstart an economy than to create jobs building weapons to kill people. We could create jobs finding solutions for cleaning up the environment, curing disease, rebuilding ghettos, improving transportation, etc. America could invest its new unborrowed credit and currency into improving our educational facilities. We could fund the sciences and the arts and start an era of American Renaissance. A debt-free currency will not create inflation, it will create prosperity, unlike the world has ever known! The People, rather than the bankers will prosper. This solution will also eliminate the need for individual income taxes and give every working taxpayer the equivalent of a 30% to 40% raise without any additional cost to the employer. This extra income will be spent, stimulating our economy. It is as simple as this.

Closing Thought

If, in the name of God and Country, all freedom loving, righteously indignant Americans stood firm and fearless against the bluffs of tyrannical IRS, and their gross misapplication of the law, their corrupt and self-serving agency would cease to exist. Then, all Americans, including those who now remain silent against the atrocities of the IRS, for fear of retribution, will be dancing in the streets of America, singing Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is Dead.

Case #1
FROM:

Department of the Treasury For assistance you may call us at Internal Revenue Service the numbers shown below or you may Holtsville, NY write the Chief, Collection Branch at the address shown to the left. TAX PERIODS: 12-31-86 YOUR TAX RETURN IS OVERDUE - CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED YOUR ANSWER TO ANY OF OUR REQUESTS FOR FORM 1040 US INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RETURN FOR THE TAX PERIOD ENDING 12-31-86. YOUR FAILURE TO RESPOND INDICATES TO US THAT YOU DO NOT INTEND TO FILE THE RETURN. WE MUST RESOLVE THIS MATTER. WE MAY TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION: 1. CRIMINAL PROSECUTION THAT INCLUDES A FINE, IMPRISONMENT, OR BOTH, FOR PERSONS WHO WILLFULLY FAIL TO FILE A TAX RETURN OR TO PROVIDE TAX INFORMATION (INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7203); OR 2. SUMMON YOU TO COME IN WITH YOUR BOOKS AND RECORDS (AS PROVIDED BY SECTIONS 7602 AND 7603 OF THE CODE). TO AVOID THESE ACTIONS, FILE THE RETURN, SHOW THAT THE RETURN HAS BEEN FILED, OR CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO FILE. BE SURE TO REFER TO THIS NOTICE AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION NEEDED. IF YOU

FILED THE RETURN, MAIL YOUR COPY OF IT; IF YOU PAID THE TAX, MAIL YOUR RECEIPT OR CANCELED CHECK. To make sure that IRS employees give courteous responses and correct information to taxpayers, a second IRS employee sometimes listens in on telephone calls. Keep this part for your records. Detach here.

7 February 1989
TO:

Director of the Foreign Operations District Internal Revenue Service Washington D.C. 20225 Dear Sir: With reference to section 1.1141-5 (26 C.F.R.) which states in part, "For purposes of Chapter 3 of the Code, an individual's statement that he or she is a citizen or resident of the United States may be relied upon by the payer of the income as proof that such individual is a citizen or resident of the United States. This statement shall be furnished to the withholding in duplicate..." Paragraph (c) of that section tells the payer to send two copies of such statement, "with a letter of transmittal to the Director of the Foreign Operations District..." I shall continue to state that I am not an alien, foreign corporation, officer, director, stockholder or employee of a foreign corporation, or a citizen of the United States living and working abroad or in a possession of the United States. I do not reside in Washington, D.C., or in a federal enclave within any of the states. I am, therefore, not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States". Sincerely, cc: IRS Chief, Collection Branch Holtsville, NY 00501 In reply refer to: LTR

FROM:

Internal Revenue Service 119717897 April 03 1989

Chief, Collection Branch 30 000 Input Op: Holtsville, New York 00501

2358C

112-20-8133 19717897 01239

8612

Taxpayer Identification Number: Tax Form: 1040 Tax Period: Dec. 31, 1986 Correspondence Received: February 13, 1989 Dear: Based on the information you have provided, the account specified above is resolved. We may contact you in the future, if further issues arise requiring clarification. At present, no further response is needed on the above account. Sincerely yours

Case #2
TO: District Director Internal Revenue Service Ogden, Utah 84201 Dear: On or about December 1, 1990, I received an unsigned document claiming that you have not received the tax return 1040, and requesting that the form 1040 be filed. I have enclosed a copy of that request. I know of no such code that requires me to file a "tax return 1040". If you know of such a code, please identify it for me. I have enclosed a copy of the letter that I have sent to the Director of the Foreign Operations District, concerning this matter. In searching the revenue code book which your people kindly supplied to me, I discovered that only an "individual" is required to file a tax return (26 USC 6012) and then only under certain circumstances. In looking at Section 7701(a)(30), I discovered the definition of a "United States Person" as meaning a "citizen of the United States", "resident of the United States", "domestic corporation", "domestic partnership" and a "domestic trust or estate". There is no INDIVIDUAL defined under 7701(a)(30) and therefore I cannot be an "individual" within the meaning of 7701(a)(1) and/or 26 USC 6012. As well, the Supreme Court, in the case of Wills vs. Michigan State Police, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1989) made it perfectly clear that I, the sovereign, cannot be named in any statute as merely a "person", or "any person". I am a member of

the "sovereignty" as defined in Yick Wo vs. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 and the Dred Scott case, 60 U.S. 393. Therefore and until you can prove otherwise, I am not a "taxpayer", nor an "individual" that is required to file a tax return. Please forward me a letter stating that I am not liable for this tax return, or produce the documentation that requires me to file the "requested" tax return. If you have any questions concerning this letter, you may write to me at the address shown below. Please sign all papers so that I know who I am dealing with. Until such time as I hear from you or your office, I will take the position that I am no longer liable for filing the return. Failure to respond will be taken as meaning that you have "acquiesced" and that from this date forward, the doctrine of "estoppel by acquiescence" will prevail. Sincerely, From IRS: Dear Taxpayer: Based on our information, you are no longer liable for filing this tax return. We may contact you in the future if issues arise that need clarification. You do not need to reply to this letter. Sincerely yours, /s/ J.M. Wood Chief, Collection Branch

Case #3
From IRS: Your tax return is overdue -- Contact us immediately. We still have not received your tax return, Form 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for the year ending 12-31-89. We must resolve this matter. Contact us immediately, or we may take the following action: 1. Summon you to come in with your books and records as provided by Sections 7602 and 7603 of the Internal Revenue Code:

2. Criminal prosecution that includes a fine, imprisonment, or both, for person who willfully fail to file a tax return or provide tax information (Code Section 7203). To prevent these actions, file your tax return today and attach your payment for any tax due. Even if you can't pay the entire amount of tax you owe now, it is important that you file your tax return today. Pay as much as you can and tell us when you will pay the rest. We may be able to arrange for you to pay in installments. Detach and enclose the form below with your return. To expedite processing, use the enclosed envelope. If you are not required to file or have previously filed please contact us at the phone number shown above. [unsigned] This American merely responded by jotting the following note right on the bottom of the IRS letter: PLEASE BE ADVISED that I am a nonresident alien (American) of the United States, never having lived, worked, nor having income from any source within the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, America Samoa or any other Territory within the United States, which entity has its origin and jurisdiction from Article 1 Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, I am a non-taxpayer outside of the venue and jurisdiction of 26 U.S.C. From IRS: Same as last reply above (Case #2).

Case #4

The 20th day of May, The Year of our Lord 1976 A.D. His Especial Sovereign

Doth deign to sendeth greeting to: A Vile Creature Greetings, XXXX X XXXXX, bloodsucker, fool & thief: Read now, the words of Anthony L. Hargis, thy legal & moral superior (without doubt) & Especial Sovereign, one who earneth his living & approves not of bloodsuckerism, foolishness or thievism. He approves not, that is, of thee. It hath cometh to His Especial Sovereign's attention that thou aret up to no good; viz., that thou art a dunderhead for this false process can do thee no good; for, upon its face, it doth not bear the mark of a judge, nor doth it show the name of a private person who doth complaine of a wrong, nor also, doth it complaine of a wrong, nor, alas, doth it complaine of the commission of a crime - unless refusal to support a society of beasts, brutes & vile creatures be a crime. These faults, either of them, do make thy process false & therefore, whatsoever information is gained by it, can, in no way appear in any court proceedings. It is thus that His Especial Sovereign supports His charge that thou art a fool, that thou behavior art worthy of a monkey. And since thou art a fool, His Especial Sovereign is greatly confident thou wilt cause court action in which He may prove, beyond a scintilla of doubt, His other two contentions: that thou art a bloodsucker & thief. let thee be advised, therefore, that deep within the bosom of His Especial Sovereign, there doth lurk feelings of great animosity toward these ego substitutes of putrid creatures; & they can be purged not without the destruction of those that thrive & prosper upon bloodshed, stupidity & sores. Farewell, XXXX X XXXXX, v.c. From the Quill of Anthony L.. Hargis, H.E.S.