Selected Topics in Higgs and Super Symmetry - Marcela Carena - Theoretical Physics Dept. Fermilab - January 2004

'
Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry
Marcela Carena Theoretical Physics Dept. Fermilab
KITP Collider Workshop Santa Barbara, January 16, 2004.
&
1

Introduction Motivation for SUSY at the TeV Scale Some SUSY scenarios and signatures The role of the Tevatron in shaping the next decade Precision Measurements Discovery of new particles or new bosonic or fermionic (SUSY) dimensions Indirect SUSY signatures The MSSM Higgs Boson Phenomenology Radiative corrections to masses and couplings Benchmark scenarios and Higgs opportunities at the LHC Eects of explicit CP violation in the Higgs Sector How can this aect Higgs searches at Colliders Outlook
Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry Marcela Carena, Fermilab
Introduction
Standard Model = the pillar of particle physics that explains data collected in the past several years and provides description of physical processes up to energies of 100 GeV. However, it is only an eective theory. Many open questions origin of EWSB generation of stabilization of hierarchies: Mweak Vs MP lanck connection of electroweak and strong interactions with gravity generation of fermion masses and mixings explanation of baryon asymmetry of the universe dark matter and dark energy = crucial to get the complete picture valid up to higher energies, MP l Collider Experiments: Tevatron LHC, a Lepton Collider (TeV reach) our most robust handle to reveal the new physics that should answer these questions in this and the next decade
Marcela Carena, Fermilab
EWSB occurs at the TeV scale In the absence of big ne-tuning of scales, = New Phenomena should lie in the TeV range or below, within reach of LHC/LC Numerous theories have been proposed: two broad classes: weakly coupled dynamics strongly coupled dynamics Standard Model example of weak EWSB one extra physical state left in the spectrum HIGGS Boson Present Data no direct evidence of Higgs [mh > 114.4 GeV (LEP2)]
SM with weakly coupled Higgs is in excellent agreement with precision data = mHSM 210 GeV at 95 % C.L. In weakly coupled approach, SM most probably embedded in SUSY theory
SUSY must be broken in the ground state SUSY partners heavier than SM particles If SUSY exists, many of its most important motivations demand some SUSY particles at the TeV range or below
Solve hierarchy/naturalness problem

In low-energy SUSY: quadratic sensitivity to ef f is replaced by quadratic sensitivity to SUSY breaking scale
masses [GeV]
1200 1000 800 600
~
200
b m2
= important top quark Yukawa eects!

0 0
10 12 14 16 18
log10(Q/GeV)
SUSY breaking scale must be at or below 1 TeV if SUSY is associated with EWSB scale !
In the evolution of masses from high energy scales a negative Higgs mass parameter is induced via radiative corrections
r w ~ l
400
EWSB is radiatively generated
~ ~ tr ,bl ~ tl m1
g ~ br
2 m0+2
m1/2 m0
Play central role in unication of gauge couplings

60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Unication at GU T
1
1
0.04 and MGU T
1016 GeV
1 2
1 3
b) MSUSY =1 TeV
Experimentally, 3 (MZ ) 0.119 0.003 in the MSSM: 3 (MZ ) = 0.127 4(sin2 W 0.2315) 0.008 Remarkable agreement between Theory and Experiment!!
1016
10 2
10 4
106
10 8 1010 (GeV)
1012
1014
Langacker, Polonski
Bardeen, M.C., Pokorski, Wagner
Large value of mt can be understood as resulting from quasi infrared xed point of top-Higgs Yukawa coupling.
100
b = 3.1
G
t = 3.3
G=
0.80 G
0.90
0.95
1.05
10
xing mb and s while varying hb (MGU T ) and h (MGU T ) away from exact unication varying ht (mt ) prediction tan = v2 /v1 ; mt = ht v2 mpole t ht (mt )v 1 + s t sin 3 (185 GeV)ht (mt ) sin
Bardeen, M.C., Pokorski, Wagner
tan
4 (m )
1 100 120 140 160 180 m tpole (GeV) 200 220
Provides a good dark matter candidate
Present WMAP satellite data has conrmed with great accuracy the cold-dark matter density of the universe: 0.094 CDM h2 0.13 SUSY dark matter candidate is likely to be the lightest neutralino with mass possibly below 500 GeV and almost degenerate with the stau Arnowitt, Dutta & Hu
Ellis, Olive, Santoso, Spanos
1500
1000
>0
114 GeV 117 GeV
A0=0, >0 tan=40
800
m0 (GeV)
1000
m0[GeV]
600
120 GeV a<1110

-10
bs
400
ed low r al te mat >m ark d m 0
0 100
1000
2000
2500
200
m1/2 (GeV)
200
400
600 800 m1/2[GeV]
1000
Provides a possible solution to the observed baryon asymmetry

Baryogenesis at the electroweak phase transition: (Start with B=L=0) CP violating sources = create chiral baryon-antibaryon asymmetry in the symm. phase Net Baryon number diuse in the broken phase Strong rst order phase transition = baryon number violating processes are out of equilibrium in the broken phase = preserve the generated baryon asymmetry In the SM: EW Baryogenesis demands a Higgs mass below 40 GeV = ruled out by experiment Independent problem: not enough CP violation In Supersymmetry: both problems can be solved New bosonic degrees of freedom with coupling of order one to the Higgs = suciently strong rst order phase transition with a Higgs mass up to 120 GeV New sources of CP violation from the sfermion sector
M2 =
12 mA= 100 GeV mA= 150 GeV mA= 200 GeV mA= 300 GeV mA= 400 GeV mA= 500 GeV
BBN
(6 3)1011
10
we plot for max. phase for , sin = 1 hence, from the gure sin 0.05 preferred
M.C., Quiros, Seco, Wagner
/BBN
100
200
(GeV)
300
400
500
The mechanism of SUSY breaking is not well understood. Dierent SUSY breaking scenarios crucially dierent patterns of low energy spectrum production and decays Important to develop a comprehensive search strategy to explore the main signals in dierent SUSY breaking scenarios.
SUGRA Scenarios
Strongly interacting particles (due to RG eects) tend to be heavier than weakly interacting ones. Supersymmetric particles odd under R-parity: Rp = (1)3B+L+2S If R-parity Conserved: Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP) Stable = lots of ET distinctive SUSY signature / LSP Stable = good Dark Matter candidate: neutralinos
Extensions of MSUGRA:
CP Violation
Soft SUSY breaking parameters MAY BE COMPLEX and take any value allowed by phenomenological constraints At least two complex phases cannot be rotated away, choosing those as and A = six param. determine the sparticle spectrum: m0 , M1/2 , A0 , tan , , A Interesting constraints on SUSY param. space from EDMs of electron and u,d quarks df e
1l. 2
(Im, ImAf ) 1025 cm max.(mf , m )
1TeV max.(mf , m )
mf 10MeV
To resolve the one-loop CP crisis: Im/||, ImAf /Af 102, with (mf , m ) 200 GeV CP phases 1, but mf > 1 TeV for f = e, u, d, L Cancellations between dierent EDM terms Two-loop contributions to EDMs = constraints on CPV parameters of 3rd. gen. squarks, specially for large tan important for Higgs physics CPV makes more challenging to reconstruct SUSY masses and couplings from experimental data
Gauge-Mediated Low-energy SUSY Breaking Scenarios

Special feature LSP: light (gravitino) Goldstino: mG 106 109 GeV
q qG
If R-parity conserved, heavy particles cascade to lighter ones and G; NLSP SM partner + G e.g., 0 (h, Z, ) G; 1 Superpartner masses proportional to their gauge couplings. Signatures: decay length L 102 cm
2 mG 109 GeV
100GeV 5 MNLSP
NLSP can have prompt decays: Signature of SUSY pair: 2 hard photons, (Hs, Zs) + ET from G / macroscopic decay length but within the detector: displaced photons; high ionizing track with a kink to a minimum ionizing track (smoking gun of low energy SUSY) decay well outside the detector: ET like SUGRA /
Anomaly-Mediated SUSY Breaking Scenarios

SUSY breaking masses determined by beta functions, proportional to gauge couplings Striking signature at colliders:
1 1
at tree level, M M0 mass degeneracy lifted by radiative corrections by about 150 MeV very soft pion (decay length of order 1 cm)
0 1 1
Indirect Information on SUSY from Experiment

Higgs mass constraints from LEP = impose important constraints on SUSY breaking models & 3rd gen. squark masses
Model independent bounds on tan as a function of the heaviest stop mass for dierent values of the stop mass splitting Mt = mt2 mt1 , for mh = 115 GeV, large MA , Mt = 175 GeV
M.C., Chankowski, Pokorski & Wagner
What Can We Learn from RUN 2?

Precision measurements:
top quark mass: Mt 3 GeV W mass: MW 30 MeV with 2 fb1 with 2 fb1
high precision for Mt is important to = exploit precision on MW in the context of electroweak precision measurements Mt MW MH Correlation direct Mt and MW measurements from LEP and the Tevatron Indirect Mt and MW determination from SM t to precision data (LEP, SLD, N) SM relationship for Mt MW MH = crucial information on MH = A light SM Higgs Boson strongly favored by data
experimental errors 68% CL: LEP2/Tevatron (today) Tevatron/LHC 80.60 LC+GigaZ
80.70
MSSM
ligh
t SU
SY
MW [GeV]
80.50
80.40
MH = 113 GeV
heav
y SU
SY
80.30
80.20 160
40 MH =
0 Ge
SM
Heinemeyer, Weiglein 03
165
170
mt [GeV]
175
180
185
190
Stop and Sbottom Searches

In many models (MSUGRA, extended Gauge and AnomalyMediated) ts and quite light bs If mt1 > m + mb or > ml + m + mb
1
or or >
> MW + m0 + mb
1
m + m + mb l with f f = l or q q
() = t1 b1 b0 f f 1
Signals: 2b jets + 2 Ws + ET , / 2b jets + 2ls +ET / Selection: b-jet + jet + l + ET , / 2ls + jet + ET /
Demina, Lykken, Matchev & Nomerotski
t1
b + + 1
ECM=2.0 TeV
l)+
t1
bl
M( + 1)
ECM=2.0 TeV
=M
t1 )
M(
L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb -1 L=2 fb
-1
M( t1 )= M
+ LEP limit
(b)
+M (
M( )
(b) +
L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb -1 L=2 fb
-1
LEP limit
If above modes kinematically disallowed, t1 c0 1 (via b loop) 1 Signal/Selection: 2c jets + ET /

t1
c + 0 or t1 b W 0 1 1
(0 1)
ECM=2.0 TeV
Sbottoms: = 1 b0 b 1 100% BR if m0 > m mb b

b1 b+ 0 1
M( 0 )
(W
0)
(c)+
+M
M(
b) 1 =M (b)+ M
M( t1 )= M
(b)
(t)+
(0 )
ECM=2.0 TeV
)+M
M( t1 )= M
L=20 fb
-1
-1
M( t1 )= M
M(
L=4 fb
L=2 fb
-1
LEP 1 limit
if b0 allowed, b 2 limit degraded in 30-40 GeV
In summary: with
mt1 200/210 GeV mt1 180 GeV m 230 GeV b
1
Ldt = 4 fb1 in t1 b /t1 bl 1 in t1 c0 1 in 1 b0 b

1
L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb L=2 fb

-1
-1
0 LEP 1limit
Stop Searches in Low Energy SUSY Breaking Models Considering the stops to be the NLSP, look for signatures with jets, s and ET (small / SM backgds.) M.C, Choudhury, Diaz, Logan, Wagner
350 p + X p t t*
. . . . .
300
0.2 0.5 1 2
c + 0 c + + t G
1
.
300
s = 2 TeV
p + X p t t* b + W+ + 0 b + W+ + + t 1 G 250 s = 2 TeV
. . . . . .
0.2 0.5
250
NLSP t
.
m0 (GeV) 1
m0 (GeV) 1
5 10 20 40
200
NLSP t
.
1 2
200
150
5 c 0 t 1 dominates
. .
150
10 20 40
by
re
ou
av
is f
at a
100
50
( b + W+ 0) dominates t 1
. .
un
50
100
150
200
.
250
300
350
400
150
D i R sfav un o I ure D d at b a y
100
200
250
.
300
350
400
m(GeV) t
m(GeV) t
Cross sections for stop pair production in f b, with t c G and Signal/selection jjET /
L 2 fb1 4 fb1 S 5 6 fb 3.5 fb Max. mt (2 body) 290 GeV 315 GeV
Cross sections for stop pair production in f b, with t bW G and Signal/selection bbW W ET /
L 2 fb1 4 fb1 S 2.5 fb 1.3 fb Max. mt (3 body) 315 GeV 330 GeV
q q G
squark mass reach up to 400 GeV

An Interesting Highlight
Electroweak Baryogenesis
predicts light right-handed stops mtR 150 GeV and MSSM Higgs bosons in the range mh 100-118 GeV
160
mst (GeV)
140
mQ= 2 TeV
120
100 100
105
110
115
120
mH (GeV)
M.C., Quiros & Wagner
Tevatron Run II reach for Higgs and stops probes Baryogenesis at the Electroweak scale!
Gauge-Mediated Tevatron Reach

Bino-like NLSP: 0 G 1 Signal: XET / X = s and/or jets
10
2
Higgsino-like NLSP: 0 (h, Z, )G 1 Signal: b ET X / diboson signatures (Z /jj; h b /T b)E

10
2
CDF projected limits from diphotons, GMSB model Discovery reach (2fb-1)
CDF projected limits from b/t, GMSB model E
Discov ery rea
ch (2fb -1 )
x BR (fb)
10 x BR 95% CL limit (2fb-1)
10
95% C
L limit
(2fb -1)
95% CL limit (10fb-1) 1 95% CL limit (30fb-1) 1
95% C
L limit
(10fb -1 )
95% C
200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 ~ M(1) (GeV)
L limit
(30fb -1 )
120 140 160 180 ~200 220 240 260 280 300 M(1) (GeV)
M 325 GeV (exclusion) & 260 GeV (discovery)
M sensitivity up to 200 GeV for 2 fb1

1
Non-prompt Decays
400 160
Neutralino NLSP
140 120 100 80 60
Few 100 TeV
F few 1000 TeV

Chargino Mass (GeV)
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 100 200 300 400
Bino-like NLSP Photon Pointing: it is possible to identify a displaced photon from a secondary vertex and possibly det. decay length using TOF Meas. of decay length meas. of SUSY breaking scale
E /T A naly sis
2 fb-1 30 fb-1 2 fb
-1
40 20 500
c (cm)
Higgsino like-NLSP = displaced s or secondary vertices from b jj, b,

+
Search for displaced Zs using large ET displaced jet with nite impact parameter or diplaced ls should be explored. If F few 1000 TeV = outside detector decay looks like traditional 0 LSP 1
(TeV)
'jjE An /T alysis
30 fb
-1
Stau NLSP:
prompt decays
20 30 40
(TeV)
50 60 70 80 90 100
2 high-pT s and high ET / m < 80 GeV (5) D m 100 GeV (95% CL) CDF
mass sensitivity for 2
fb1
Stau NLSP
10 3
Th r eo
Cross Section (fb)
y
2 fb
-1
10
Short-lived NL SP
30 fb
-1
quasi-stable s highly-ionizing tracks, extra -like tracks for 2 fb1 , m > 150 GeV excl. 110 GeV disc. (40 GeV improvement with ToF) 175 GeV disc.
10
2 fb
-1
Quasi-stable N
1 30 fb
-1
LSP
CDF =
D
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Chargino Mass (GeV)
D =
Bs + as a probe of tan at the Tevatron
SM sample diagram: SM amplitude Vts M Br(B + )

SM m
= (3.8 1.0) 109
In the MSSM, with two Higgs doublets, the Higgs Mediated contribution can put this BR at the reach of the Tevatron!
H* u ~ tR sL ~ Hu ~ Hd ~ tL bR
xxx
After SUSY breakdown, new contributions to d-type ~ H* ~ H* u u quark masses are generated even in a Minimal Flavor bR bL 23 23 ~ ~ RR Model LL (CKM-induced) b bL R ~ t , Mt , M + ) ~ Br(B s + )MSSM tan6 M1 fs (A i 2 where f const. = 0 for MSUSY .
sL
bR A0R s
~ g
~ g
Babu, Kolda
branching fraction can be enhanced by three orders of magnitude!
(a)
(b)

i

~ g
~ g
Contours of Maximun allowed value of BR(Bs ) as a function of MA and tan .

60 50 40 30 20 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
MFV
1 1x
0-6
3x1
0-7
1x1
0-7
3x10
-8
Br(Bs + ) < 2.6 106 from Run 1. Single event sensitivity at Run 2 is 108 for 2 f b1
Kane, Kolda, Lennon
tan
-8 1x10
mA [GeV]
If a signature is observed at the Tevatron = lower bound on the value of tan MA 100GeV
2/3
tan > 11
Br(Bs + ) 107
1/6
Interesting to study direct reach in MA via b A/H production for large tan and b reach in Br(Bs + ) for dierent sets of MSSM paraneters
MSSM Higgs sector at Tree-Level

H1 , H2 doublets = 2 CP-even Higgs h, H 1 CP-odd state A 2 charged Higgs H
Higgs masses and couplings given in terms of two parameters: mA and tan v2 /v1 mixing angle = cos2 ( ) =
m2 (m2 m2 ) A H
h
m2 (m2 m2 ) Z h h
Couplings to gauge bosons and fermions (norm. to SM) hZZ, hWW, ZHA, WH H HZZ, HWW, ZhA, WH h sin( ) cos( )
(h,H,A) u cos / sin , sin / sin , 1/ tan u (h,H,A) dd/l+ l sin / cos , cos / cos , tan If mA MZ decoupling limit up to correc. O(m2 /m2 ) Z A m2 cos2 2 Z
cos( ) = 0
lightest Higgs has SM-like couplings and mass m2 h other Higgs bosons: heavy and roughly degenerate mA mH m up to correc. O(m2 /m2 ) Z A H
Radiative Corrections to Higgs Masses

important quantum correc. due to loops of particles and their superpartners: incomplete cancellation due to SUSY breaking = main eects: top and stop loops; bottom and sbottom loops in large tan regime The stop mass matrix:
2 MQ + m2 + DL t
mt Xt
2 MU + m2 + DR t
mt Xt
2 DL ( 1 2 sin2 W )Mz cos 2 and 2 3 2 2 M 2 cos 2 DR 3 sin W z
m2 h
2 MS = 1 (m2 2 t1
2 MZ
cos 2 +
2 2 g2 m4 t 2 8 2 MW
2 ln(MS /m2 ) t
2 Xt + 2 MS
2 Xt 1 2 12 MS
+ h.o.
+ m2 ) and Xt = At / tan stop mixing t

2
two-loop log. and non-log.eects are numerically important computed by dierent methods: diagrammatic eective potential RG-improved eective potential upper limit on Higgs mass: mh < 135 GeV MS = 1 2 TeV = mh 2 5 GeV mt = 1 GeV = mh 1 GeV
main eects already present in one-loop formulae
m4 enhancement t logarithmic sensitivity to mti depend. on t-mixing Xt = max. value Xt 6MS

(scheme depend.) small asym. at h.o.
M.C. & Haber
MSU SY MQ = MU = MD
if MSU SY
2 mt MS
2 MSU SY
at 2 loops Mg dependence
MSSM Higgs Masses as a function of MA
m2 cos2 ( ) + m2 sin2 ( ) = [mmax (tan )]2 H h h
cos2 ( ) 1 for large tan , low mA = H has SM-like couplings to W,Z sin2 ( ) 1 for large mA = h has SM-like couplings to W,Z
Hence, for large tan : always one CP-even Higgs with SM-like couplings to W,Z and mass below mmax 135 GeV h if mA > mmax h if mA < mmax h mh mh mmax h mA and and mH mH mA mmax h
Radiative Corrections to Higgs Boson Couplings 1 Through rad. correc. to the CP-even Higgs mass matrix, M2 , which denes the ij mixing angle sin cos = M2 / (TrM2 )2 4 detM2 12 important eects of rad. correc. on sin or cos depending on sign of At and magnitude of At /MS . = govern couplings of Higgs to fermions = via rad. correc. to cos( ) and sin( ) governs Higgs couplings to vector bosons
2 SUSY vertex correc. to Yukawa couplings, which modify the eective Lagrangian, coupling Higgs to fermions

0 b 0 b Le hb H1 b + hb H2 b
hb modies the mb hb relation mb hb v1 + hb v2 = hb v cos 1 + hb tan hb
Mg 2S hb t+ b = tan tan + b 2 2 2 hb 3 max(m , m , Mg )

b1 b2
b O(1) if tan large
h2 At t+ t tan 2 max(m2 ,m2 ,2 ) b 16 t1 t2
Modied Higgs Boson Couplings to b-quarks gh b b gH b b gA b b

sin mb v cos (1+b ) cos mb v cos (1+b ) mb v(1+b )
(1 b / tan tan ) (1 b tan / tan )
tan |b |
similar eects on coupling but | |
Important modications of couplings occur for regions of MSSM parameter space dep. on sign and values of At , Ab , Mg and magnitudes of Mg /MS , /MS destroy the basic relation: gh b /gh mb /m b strong suppression of coupling of h (H) to bottoms if tan b / tan ((tan )1 b / tan ) gh b 0 ; gh m b (h H) b v = main decay modes of SM-like MSSM Higgs: b 80% b drastically changed = other decay modes enhanced = Higgs phenomenology at colliders revisited!! + 7 8%
More generally we can write the Eective Lagrangian: Le =

ij i L j (hb + hb )R Hd Qj + (ht + ht )tR Qi Hu b L
k L k +ht tR Qk Hd + hbR Qk Hu + h.c. b L
The resulting interaction Lagrangian dening the couplings of the physical Higgs bosons to third generation fermions: Lint =
q=t,b,
ghqq hq q + gHqq Hq q igAqq A5 q + H t tH + h.c. . bg q b
g(h/H/A),b as given before. Similarly, g(h/H/A), + replacing mb m , b b and g(h/H/A),tt replacing mb mt , b t , tan , tan 1/ tan(), 1/ tan() (no tan enhancement in t ; b ) Similar to neutral Higgs case, for the charged Higgs one has important radiative corrections for large tan
gH t b
1 1 mt ht mb cot 1 tan PR + tan PL v 1 + t ht v (1 + b )
also m corrections in gH may be included.
MSSM Higgs Boson Searches at Hadron Colliders

Due to large number of free parameters, a complete analysis of MSSM param. is too involved dierent initial states production and decay channels relevant at lepton colliders are dierent from hadron colliders dierent enviroment at the Tevatron and LHC dierent relevant Higgs production and decay channels as well Main Neutral Higgs Boson Production Processes Tevatron: vector-boson bremsstrahlung: p V h/V H V b p b associated production: p b b with = A/h or A/H p b bbb LHC: vector-boson fusion: qq qqV V qqh, qqH, with h, H V V, + , gluon fusion: gg associated production gg, q q tt with subsequent decay b V V b,
Benchmark Scenarios for the Search of the SM-like Neutral MSSM Higgs
SM-like MSSM Neutral Higgs with stronger coupling to the W,Z bosons (also to top for intermediate/large tan ) for mA > mmax h h for mA < mmax (and tan 10) H h and mh(H) mmax 135 GeV h Scenarios proposed: designed to study MSSM Higgs Sector without any assumptions of a particular soft SUSY breaking scenario taking into account only constraints from the Higgs sector itself For each scenario: b Fix values of t, sectors and gaugino masses Vary tan and mA 0.5 tan 50 and mA 1 TeV. Present results in terms of [ BR]M SSM [ BR]SM for various production channels
The mmax Scenario h

maximizes the value of the lightest Higgs mass & allows conservative tan exclusion bounds MSU SY = 1 TeV, Xt = 6 MSU SY , = M2 = 200 GeV, Ab = At , Mg = 0.8 MSU SY
LHC h
Tevatron: h b b
ghb , gh enhanced due to sin ef f / cos factor for low mA and intermediate/large b tan = strong suppression of h = gg h strongly suppressed compared to SM and W /Z W/Zh W/Zb nearly always enhanced b (WWh/ZZh coupling is SM-like for mA mmax ) h For mA mmax , tan 10 = W /Z W/ZH W/Zb similar behavior b h
LHC Prospects for Neutral Higgs searches: the mmax scenario h

max_ms_1.0_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20
1
40 30 20 40 30 20
tthbb 100 fb LEP
1
40 30 20
WWh 30 fb LEP
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
40 30 20
LEP h 100 fb
1
40 30 20
vector-boson fusion with decay into taus is the decisive channel with 30 f b1 h , from gluon fusion and associated production with top quarks, and h b from associated production b with top quarks, need 100 f b1
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
The mmax scenario at LHC with 30 fb1 h

ma2_ms_1.0_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20
tthbb 30 fb LEP
1
ma2_ms_1.0_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20
LEP h 30 fb
1
40 30 20
40 30 20
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
Small e Scenario
Besides gg h , most channels at the Tevatron and LHC rely on h b + b, If e (rad. corrected ) is small = ghb and gh couplings can be importantly b suppressed : Suppression occurs for moderate/large tan and small/moderate mA Also, h b can have large corrections from g and t/ loops (b ) b b/ MSUSY = 800 GeV, Xt = 1.2 TeV, = 2.5MSUSY , M2 = 500 GeV, Ab = At , Mg = 500 GeV
Tevatron: h b b
LHC: h +
M.C., Heinemeyer, Wagner & Weiglein
Signicant suppression for tan 20 and mA 200 (400) GeV for h b ( ) b = Searches via W/Zh, W W h and tth will be more dicult than in the SM. Instead, the h channel will be enhanced compared to the SM.
LHC Prospects for Neutral Higgs searches: Small e scenario

eff_ms_0.8_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20
1
eff_ms_0.8_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20 40 30 20
tthbb 100 fb LEP
1
40 30 20
WWh 30 fb LEP
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
ef2_ms_0.8_pht_0_phg_0
40 30
h 30 fb
1
40 30 20
LEP
20
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
Complementarity between the vector boson fusion and the h channels for 30 f b1 b tth tt b channel relevant only with high luminosity
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
The ef f scenario at LHC: tth with 30 fb1 , h with 100 fb1

ef2_ms_0.8_pht_0_phg_0 eff_ms_0.8_pht_0_phg_0
40 30 20
tthbb 30 fb LEP
1
40 30 20
40 30
h 100 fb
1
40 30 20
LEP
20
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
tan
100
150
200
250
MH+ (GeV)
300
350
Charged Higgs searches at the Tevatron

BR(t > H b) 160
MH+ (GeV)
Shaded area excluded by Run1 D frequentist analysis from H searches in top decays
tan
Including dominant SUSY correc. for large tan and a heavy SUSY spectrum based on L
mb (Q) tan g 1+mb 2MW
BR(t > H b) 160 150 140
0.1
Vtb H + tL bR (Q) + h.c. = M SSM

BR(t > H b)
+
QCD (1+mb)2
imp.
160 150
0.1
Drastic variations on tan mH

0.2
MH+ (GeV)
MH+ (GeV)
140 130 120

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
plane bounds, depending on MSSM parameter space

0.7
130
0.2
120
0.3
110
0.4
110 100
tan
tan
M.C., Garcia, Nierste, Wagner
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Curves of constant BR for t bH + after resummation of LO and NLO logarithms of QCD corrections included applying OPE
150 140 130 120

0.4
0.1
0.2 0.3
110 100
0.5 0.6
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Similar analysis for pp H + tb + X at LHC for large tan
MA0 [GeV] 60 50 40 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
LHC K
QCD
L=300 fb =1
-1
30 tan
5 discovery
20
Tree-Level set A set B set C set D

10 200 300 400 500 600 700 MH+ [GeV] 800 900 1000
Discovery reach at the LHC for dierent sets of SUSY parameters, which can enhance or suppress the H tb coupling
Discovery reach at LHC with 300 fb1 and tan > 30 best case scenario: mH + 1 TeV worst case scenario: mH + 450 GeV
Belyaev, Garcia, Gausch, Sola
CP violation in the Higgs Sector

at tree level = MSSM Higgs potential invariant under CP After radiative corrections: CP violation induced through loop eects via 3. generation sfermion and gaugino mass parameters
Many possible relevant phases to Higgs sector mg ( one phase if Univ. gaugino masses) Af
and
m2 12
Due to U(1) symm.of the conformal inv. sector: one can redene elds and absorb two phases rephasing inv. combinations
if Im ((m2 ) Af ) = 0 12 and/or Im ((m2 ) mg ) = 0 12
= CP violating eects will be present in the MSSM

in practice, take m2 and real and leave phases in Af and mg 12
Higgs Potential Quantum Corrections

Minimization should be performed with respect to real and imaginary parts of Higgs 0 0 uctuations H1 = 1 + iA1 H2 = 2 + iA2 Performing a rotation: A1 , A2 = A, G0 (Goldstone)
Main Eect of CP-Violation is the mixing between the three neutral Higgs boson states
A 1 2
H1 H2 H3
= O
In the base (A, 1 , 2 ):
M2 = N
m2 A
2 MSP
2 MSP 2 MSS
2 MSS is similar to the mass matrix in the CP conserving case, and 2 MA is the mass of the would-be CP-odd Higgs.
2 where MSP Im(At )
m2 no longer a physical parameter, but the charged Higgs mass MH can be used as A a physical parameter, together with MS , ||, |At |, arg(At ) and arg(Mg )
Interaction Lagrangian of W , Z vector bosons with mixtures of CP-even & CP-odd Higgs bosons. gHi V V gHi Hj Z gHi H W + = = = cos O1i + sin O2i (V = W, Z) O3i (cos O2j sin O1j ) O3j (cos O2i sin O1i ) cos O2i sin O1i + iO3i
Oij analogous to sin( ) & cos( )
all couplings as a fc. of two: gHk V V = and sum rules:

3 2 gH ZZ i=1 i
ijk
gHi Hj V m2 = m2,max < 135 GeV Hi H1
=1
3 2 gH ZZ i=1 i
(equiv. to CP-conserv. case) upper bound remains the same Decoupling limit: mH + MZ
eective mixing between the lightest Higgs H1 and the heavy ones is zero: H1 SM-like Due to high degeneracy between the would-be mA & mH m2 A + m2 A m2 A
w/
O( )
mixing still relevant

Yukawa Couplings
0 0 Lb = hb H1 + hb H2 L bR + h.c. b b
Coupling hb generated by SUSY breaking eects
hb
3 Mg 3 M 2 S
The one loop corrections to the Yukawa couplings introduce CP-violating eects which are independent of Higgs mixing (like and )
S gH
i dd
1 hd cos +hd sin
Re(hd )O1i + Re(hd )O2i + Im(hd ) sin Im(hd ) cos O3i
P gH
i dd
1 hd cos +hd sin
Im(hd )O1i + Im(hd )O2i + Re(hd ) cos Re(hd ) sin O3i
where we have dened the phase of the supereld bR m2 hb + hb + hb tan b to be real and positive
CP-Violating Higgs Bosons in the light of LEP2

Production Mechanism: e+ e Hi Z and e+ e Hi Hj CPX Scenario: MSU SY = 0.5, 1 TeV = 4 MSU SY mg = 1 TeV |At | = |Ab | = 2MSU SY interesting example: arg(At,b ) = 90o , arg(mg ) = 90o mH 150 GeV mH1 70 GeV mH2 105 GeV
MH1, MH2 [ GeV ]

140 130 120 110 100
90
80 70
MH+ = 150 GeV, tan = 4 = 2 TeV, |At| = |Ab| = 1 TeV MSUSY = 0.5 TeV, m(gluino) = 1 TeV m(Wino) = m(Bino) = 0.3 TeV
20 40 60 (a) 80 100 120 arg (At) = arg (Ab) [ deg ]

60 50

40
H3ZZ
g2
g , g2
H2ZZ
H1ZZ
,
H1ZZ
g2
g
-1
H3ZZ
10
g2
H1ZZ
20
40
60 (b)
80 100 120 arg (At) = arg (Ab) [ deg ]

Pilaftsis
MH1 very small but gh1 ZZ 0, MH1 + MH2 too heavy for the given value of the gH1 H2 Z coupling MH2 just at the edge of LEP reach
g
10
-2
H2ZZ
Other cases may require extra studies:

mH2 (GeV) tan
180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 0
(a)
OPAL preliminary
(b) MSSM CPX MSSM CPX
e.g. if H1 H2 kinematically allowed and H2 H1 H1 open, then present LEP bounds may be challenged.
10
a)MH2 130 GeV =

Excluded
major role of CP-violating eects.
Excluded
Theoretically inaccessible
1 0
tan (d)
b)tan <2.8 excluded c)region of MH1 50 GeV open channels: ZH2 and H1 H2 with H2 H1 H1 b bbb (broaden signal with reduced sensitivity)
50
(c)
100
mH1 (GeV)
200
400
mH2 (GeV)
tan
MSSM CPX
MSSM CPX
10
10
Excluded
1 0 50
Excluded
1 0
example: mH1 = 39 GeV, mH2 = 105 GeV tan = 8.5 not excluded
100
mH1 (GeV)
200
400
mH+ (GeV)
Due to reduced couplings of Hi to W/Z gauge bosons and to extended regions where H2 H1 H1 dominates No limit on lightest Higgs can be given independent of tan (May change after combination of 4 experiments) Can Such decay chain be seen at the Tevatron? Some studies at parton level. . . also for LHC
gg H2 H1 H1 ?
Approximate LEP exclusion and Tevatron (3 / 5 fb1 ) and LHC (5 discovery) limits in the mH1 tan plane for CPX scenarios with dierent phases (arg Mg ) = arg(At,b )
LEP(95)/TeV(3)/LHC(5) for CPX0.5
20 40 60 80 100 120 20 40 60 80 100

120
40 30 20 10
40 30 20 10
45 lines Tevatron: W/Z Hi ( b b)
tan
90
2 40 30 20 10
60
0 2 40 30 20 10 5
135 lines LHC: gg Hi b (100 fb1 ) tt Hi ( b (100 fb1 ) b) WW/ZZ Hi ( + ) (30 fb1 ) grey LEP exclusion.
M.C., Ellis, Pilaftsis, Wagner
300
2
20 40 60 80 100
00
2
40 60 80 100 120
120 20
MH1 (GeV)
low tan and low mHi region remains uncovered in the absence of the H2 H1 H1 analysis Encourage the study of gg H2 H1 H1 and ttH2 and W/Z H2 with subsequent decay H2 H1 H1 using the extra leptons from the W/Zs.
Similar plot as above but showing dierent channels separately and in the tan mH + plane
CPX0.5 900 900
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
40 30 20 10
40 30 20 10
tan
2 40 30 20 10
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
MH+ (GeV)
WWHi
Hi
ttHi
WHi
2 40 30 20 10 5
The Tevatron could see a 3 hint with 5 fb1 in a sizeable area of parameter space If arg(M)= 0 instead, stronger suppresg sion of BR(H1,2 ) b and both upper b channels less competitive gluon fusion Higgs production with subsequent decay into taus still crucial channel at rst years of LHC!
In some regions of parameter space strong H1 + suppression

CPX0.5 1400 1400
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
40 30 20 10
40 30 20 10 5
tan
2 40 30 20 10
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
MH+ (GeV)
WWHi
Hi
ttHi
WHi
However, depending on the charged Higgs mass and tan values b beb comes suppressed with respect to + Complementarity of Tevatron and low luminosity LHC could be crucial for early discovery in this type of scenarios.
2 40 30 20 10 5
In MSSM with CP violation: mass splitting among neutral Higgs bosons can be sizeable and they can share their couplings to W/Zs
3HGC20.5 1450 1450
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
40 30 20 10
tan
2 40 30 20 10
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
MH+ (GeV)
WWHi
Hi
ttHi
WHi
2 40 30 20 10 5
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
40 30 20 10 5
= 3 signatures with very low signicance = they can be very close in mass and one signal can be the background to the other.
MSSM SM-like Higgs studies show that
Tevatron W/ZHi ( b and LHC W W Hi ( + ) b) = direct test of Higgs mechanism, can be aected very dierently by radiative corrections. = nice complementarity ttHi ( b needs high luminosity option at LHC O(100 fb1 ) b) h channel may be dicult depending on SUSY parameter space (especially in CPX scenarios) LHC discovery reach in the rst years relies strongly on vector-boson fusion Higgs production, with Hi + . It will be useful to study this channel with detailed detector simulations including specially challenging cases.
Outlook
By the End of This Decade Tevatron will have measured Mt , MW to unprecedented accuracy indirect constraints on MHSM If Nature is kind, discovery of new particles. If Nature, the accelerator and the detectors are kind, and physicists very smart, we may learn something about EWSB! In the Next Decade LHC: A sure window to new physics: Higgs SUSY New Dimensions If Higgs & SUSY are there, we will nd out. If Nature is kind, we will know exactly which type of SUSY is there. LC unique capabilities to do precision Physics open the window to Planck scale physics unique connection with Cosmology New Particles & Interactions

Selected Topics in Higgs and Super Symmetry - Marcela Carena - Theoretical Physics Dept. Fermilab - January 2004

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Selected Topics in Higgs and Super Symmetry - Marcela Carena - Theoretical Physics Dept. Fermilab - January 2004

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

'

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena Theoretical Physics Dept. Fermilab

KITP Collider Workshop Santa Barbara, January 16, 2004.

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Solve hierarchy/naturalness problem

= important top quark Yukawa eects!

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

EWSB is radiatively generated

Play central role in unication of gauge couplings

0.04 and MGU T

Bardeen, M.C., Pokorski, Wagner

1 100 120 140 160 180 m tpole (GeV) 200 220

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Provides a good dark matter candidate

A0=0, >0 tan=40

120 GeV a<1110

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

600 800 m1/2[GeV]

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Provides a possible solution to the observed baryon asymmetry

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

(Im, ImAf ) 1025 cm max.(mf , m )

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Gauge-Mediated Low-energy SUSY Breaking Scenarios

Anomaly-Mediated SUSY Breaking Scenarios

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Indirect Information on SUSY from Experiment

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

What Can We Learn from RUN 2?

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Stop and Sbottom Searches

L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb -1 L=2 fb

L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb -1 L=2 fb

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

If above modes kinematically disallowed, t1 c0 1 (via b loop) 1 Signal/Selection: 2c jets + ET /

Sbottoms: = 1 b0 b 1 100% BR if m0 > m mb b

if b0 allowed, b 2 limit degraded in 30-40 GeV

Ldt = 4 fb1 in t1 b /t1 bl 1 in t1 c0 1 in 1 b0 b

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

L=20 fb -1 L=4 fb L=2 fb

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

squark mass reach up to 400 GeV

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

M.C., Quiros & Wagner

Selected Topics in Higgs and Supersymmetry

Marcela Carena, Fermilab

Gauge-Mediated Tevatron Reach

Higgsino-like NLSP: 0 (h, Z, )G 1 Signal: b ET X / diboson signatures (Z /jj; h b /T b)E

CDF projected limits from b/t, GMSB model E

Discov ery rea