AboriginaI stereotypes as communicated through the AustraIian two doIIar coin.
According to the Australian mint (in its inception, the deign brief for Australia's two dollar coin was for designers to "include a representation of the head and shoulders of a traditional Australian Aboriginal, a representation of the Southern Cross and a representation of Australian flora." (Royal Australian Mint, FAQ)
The final design was "prepared by Mr Horst Hahne", and Australian designer employed by the Australian mint since its establishment in 1965. (Museum Victoria, "Royal Mint") The Coin contains all the three aforementioned elements, in the from of an "Aboriginal elder", the Southern Cross star constellation, and a plant called a "Xanthorrhoea".
The plant, Xanthorrhoea, is also colloquially known as a "black boy", which also is a derogatory term for Australian Aborigines. (Plant Encyclopaedia, plantcare.com)
The Australian mint notes that the "Aboriginal Elder" is "not intended to depict any person in particular" however also mentions was created with "inspiration taken from a drawing by Mr Ainslie Roberts." The "Elder" depicted is believed to be an image painted by Roberts' of Gwoya Jungarai (nb, this name is often spelled in various ways). The coins introduction in 1988, however, was not the first time that Gwoya Jungarai's image had been used in depictions of Aboriginal Australians.
2 An image of Jungarai was first used on the front page of Walkabout Magazine, a tourism magazine in 1935, which quickly became an icon. Jungarai was, according to the man responsible for the image Charles Holmes, (a tourism executive), "The most magnificent specimen of aboriginal manhood". (Jillian E Barnes, page 83, "Resisting the captured image: how Gwoja Tjungurrayi, 'One Pound Jimmy', escaped the 'Stone Age" ANU press, Published December 2007)
The image however was not without controversy. Barnes states that "Holmes supported the principle of 'White Australia'." and actively "sought to foster the belief that the Australian population was already 97% white British stock and the 'effacement' of the remaining 62,000 'full-bloods' or 'wild savages' was assured.". (Barnes, 92)
The actual photographer, Roy Dunstan, reportedly "managed poses, expressions and settings", and whilst Holmes view is quite radical, the final image instead chooses to portray what is known as a "Noble Savage". (Barnes, 92) which Holmes ultimately decided to place on the cover of Walkabout to "mark the progress made by settler Australians during the first fifty years of federation." (Barnes, 95)
According to Jillian E Barnes, Jungarai's image "during the following 30 years . played a significant role in the definition of Australian Aboriginality."
This same image of Jungarai arose again in 1950 when it was used on an Australian Stamp. Underneath the stamp the generic word "Aborigne" appeared, as apposed to Jungarai's name.
This is likely due to the fact that Jungarai was not actually a figure of great public importance,
3 or any real notability. n fact, it was only when avid stamp collectors sought to find out who the portrait was, that Jungarai's name resurfaced. Holmes lead a four year documented 'hunt'. Upon finding Jungarai's once more, Holmes took a series of photos to 'follow' up those from the 1935 Walkabout mage. (Barnes, 106) The images that were published showed Jungarai in a similar pose and state as the original, however later it was revealed that these images too were staged. The original un-cropped photos show Jungarai holding his work clothes (for Jungarai now worked as at a cattle station) beside him. Though Holmes never responded directly to these images and its censorship, Holmes had previously made claims in regard to earlier images that he saw Jungarai as a "'symbol of a vanishing race'."
Barnes concluded that Holmes' images were "a powerful form of self-justification for colonisation." (Barnes, 119) Holmes' images did not reflect Jungarai's life or personal achievements and growth, but instead communicated a very particular narrow view of a "European idea of 'primitive' man". Barnes argues these images "reinforced negative stereotypes of Aboriginal men and fostered a belief in British superiority/ndigenous inferiority when tourists were first being encouraged to travel to the inland."
Jungarai for the bulk of his lifetime has been simply known as "One Pound Jimmy". (Barnes, 108) According to his son, Cliffard Possum, Jungarai established himself as a well respected and knowledgeable guide for "Aboriginal enthusiasts" The name "One pound Jimmy" while contended, supposedly derives from the fact that "Jimmy" would charge a substation fee for his guidance (as one pound represented two weeks work as a stockman in the area). This too then may suggest the origins of his use of the two dollar coin, as 'one pound' was the equivalent of two dollars.
4 t was in these circumstances that in 1954, "One Pound Jimmy" met Ainslie Roberts. Roberts was an advertising executive, turned painter, on a 'break' from work searching for inspiration. Deborah Rose Bird states that Roberts' "interactions with Aborigines and opportunities to gain an understanding of myth and landscape, [were] formative." Robert's went on to also say himself that he saw Australian Aborigines as " 'very old' and 'very nearly extinct'" and that "he wanted his paintings to be 'speaking for an ancient culture'." (Deborah Bird Rose, Page 50, "The redemptive frontier: a long road to nowhere" ANU press, Published 2005.) Yet, with this apparent admiration, and sympathy for "One Pound Jimmy" and 'his' people Roberts reportedly "did not ask One Pound Jimmy. about the place, the stones." in respect to the images he was painting. Rose claims that, Jimmy merely facilitated the travel, but did did no "journey" with him.
And so, despite Robert's best intentions it can still be said that despite his seeming nobility, Rose argues that (Aboriginal) identity is not "built around synthesis and transformation" and thus Roberts' western paintings perhaps just further aided to the stereotyping of a landscape and people.
Historically several key dates can be clearly marked during this period. Since federation in 1901, Australia was under a constitution that stated "aboriginal natives shall not be counted". ("Fact sheet 150 The 1967 Referendum". National Archives of Australia. <http://www.naa.gov.au/ about-us/publications/fact-sheets/fs150.aspx.>") This clause, however, was revoked (with 90% support) under a monumental referendum in 1967. t was therefor national policy that in pre- 1967 Australia that Aboriginal Australians were classed as part of the 'flora and fauna' act. Despite Australia decimalisation and mostly all other coins being issued the previous year, the two dollar coin was not to be introduced until 1988. Yet, looking back to the design brief,
5 a "representation of Australian flora" is required next to a "traditional Australian Aboriginal", a very backwards statement. All other coins of the Australian currency posses fauna as their central theme. Whilst it would be hard to argue stereotypes are therefore transmitted in such a 'coincidence' (especially with such a disparity in years), feel it must be taken in to consideration, and noted as a curiosity.
n 1988, the year of the 2 dollar coins release, Australia Day was marked by a large protest march that sought to raise awareness of indigenous rights and general aboriginal awareness in the supposed newly 'inclusive' Australia. "Celebrations focused on the discovery of Australia with a re-enactment of the arrival of the first fleet [from exactly 200 years prior]. However, the Aboriginal protest was a reminder that Australia had been inhabited at least 40,000 years before European arrival." ("ndigenous Protest, 1988 Australian Bicentenary" viewed May 2011 <http://museumvictoria.com.au/collections/themes/2835/indigenous-protest-1988-australian- bicentenary>)
The Oxford Dictionary defines a stereotype as "a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing" (and also very ironically "a relief printing plate cast in a mold") The Australian Two Dollar coin exemplifies such a definition. The Royal australia mint fails to identify the individual depicted, or even give justification for using a "generic" image. Whilst the individual has been 'identified', his story is false recognition, and "unwanted association". (Barnes 114) t is an image that in various forms, has been fixed in Australian consciousness since federation. An image which communicates not only an oversimplified depiction of an individual and people, but a time of great misrepresentation despite any political and societal reform.
6 All other coins contain well recognised figures (being the Queen of England or Australian animals), and all notes contain well marked notable individuals (including Aboriginal Australian scholar, David Unaipon).
7
"The Royal Australian Mint", viewed 20 May 2011, <http://www.ramint.gov.au/faq/ >
Museum Victoria, viewed May 2011 <http://museumvictoria.com.au/collections/themes/2042/ horst-hahne-coin-engraver-royal-australian-mint>
Plantcare.com, viewed may 2011<,http://www.plantcare.com/encyclopedia/black-boy- 1770.aspx>
Jillian E Barnes, "Resisting the captured image: how Gwoja Tjungurrayi, 'One Pound Jimmy', escaped the 'Stone Age" ANU press, Published December 2007
Deborah Bird Rose, "The redemptive frontier: a long road to nowhere" p50 ANU press, Published 2005.
"Our Currency", Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, viewed Mat 2011 <http:// www.dfat.gov.au/facts/currency.html>
"ndigenous Protest, 1988 Australian Bicentenary" viewed May 2011 <http:// museumvictoria.com.au/collections/themes/2835/indigenous-protest-1988-australian- bicentenary>
"Fact sheet 150 The 1967 Referendum". National Archives of Australia. <http://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/publications/fact-sheets/fs150.aspx.>"
"Aboriginal History Timeline" Creative Spirits, Viewed May 2011 <http://www.creativespirits.info/ aboriginalculture/history/aboriginal-history-timeline-late-20th.html>