00 voturi pozitive00 voturi negative

31 vizualizări11 paginiMay 22, 2012

© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

31 vizualizări

00 voturi pozitive00 voturi negative

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

Sunteți pe pagina 1din 11

Robust and Fast Three-Phase PLL Tracking System

Felice Liccardo, Pompeo Marino, and Giuliano Raimondo

AbstractThis paper presents a simple, robust, and fast syn-

chronization method to detect the phase angle of the positive

sequence of a three-phase ac system. The algorithm was derived

from a standard phase-locked-loop (PLL) circuit based on the pq

theory, but a feedforward action is implemented to guarantee high

dynamic performance in conjunction with a modied feedback

action to reduce the phase-angle estimation error to zero. The

result is a fast tracking system that improves the start-up stage

and rapid input variations. It guarantees accurate phase locking

and is robust with respect to ac distortions such as harmonics,

subharmonics, and voltage imbalance. The control model for the

proposed PLL system was based on the standard qPLL structure.

A linear analysis was performed to show the benets of the

proposed solution, and recommendations are given for tuning its

parameters. The proposed technique was tested and compared

with other algorithms by means of simulations. The experimental

and simulation results are shown and compared.

Index TermsPhase-locked loop (PLL), power systems, syn-

chronization, utility interface.

I. INTRODUCTION

T

HE growing use of static converters in both three- and

single-phase applications requires a fast and accurate

method for phase-angle estimation. This is a very important

task in any application where active/reactive power ow control

is needed. This control should guarantee the good operation

of the power-conditioning equipment connected to the utility

grid, such as an active front end (AFE), active lters, static

VAR compensator, uninterruptible power supply, exible ac

transmission systems, etc. [1][6].

The wide diffusion of distributed generation (DG) units in

electric networks has required the large use and improvement

of synchronization algorithms to detect the positive sequence

component of the utility network. In fact, when used as a wind

generator unit, photovoltaic-based unit, or microturbine gen-

erator unit, a converter-interfaced DG unit requires converter

synchronization under a polluted and/or variable-frequency

environment, both in grid-connected and microgrid (islanding)

congurations [7][13]. Moreover, due to the high number

of loads connected to a grid and the continuous variation of

network conditions, the synchronization process should be fast

and robust. These performances guarantee disturbance rejection

and fast algorithm convergence.

Hence, an ideal synchronization algorithm should detect the

phase angle of the positive sequence of the voltage system, with

Manuscript received July 31, 2009; revised January 12, 2010; accepted

February 16, 2010. Date of publication March 8, 2010; date of current version

December 10, 2010.

The authors are with the Dipartimento di Ingegneria dellInformazione,

Second University of Naples, 81031 Aversa, Italy (e-mail: felice.liccardo@

unina2.it; p.marino@unina.it; giuliano.raimondo@unina2.it).

Color versions of one or more of the gures in this paper are available online

at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.

Digital Object Identier 10.1109/TIE.2010.2044735

Fig. 1. Basic PLL structure.

the ability to track the phase and frequency variations even if the

supply voltages are distorted and unbalanced.

Various phase-detecting methods have been proposed

[14][16]. The simplest, but not the most accurate method

under nonideal conditions, is the zero-crossing strategy. Even

if they are better than the zero-crossing method, techniques

based on low-pass lters (LPFs), space vector lters (SVFs), the

recursive weighted least-square estimation algorithm, Kalman

lters, or the fast Fourier transform do not have the best

performance under polluted supply conditions. Other methods

for managing the frequency and amplitude variations are based

on the concept of the adaptive notch lter (ANF).

The phase-looked-loop (PLL) technique, based on the syn-

chronous reference frame (SRF), is the most comprehensive

method under polluted supply conditions [17][23]. The basic

scheme of the conventional PLL method is shown in Fig. 1. The

simplicity of this structure makes this synchronization method

the most widely accepted solution, owing to the simple analog

and digital implementations. Based on a feedback structure and

the theory of dq transformations [1], a classical PLL struc-

ture comprises a phase detector, loop lter (LF), and voltage-

controlled oscillator. These structures have good performance

even with signals affected by harmonics, interharmonics, volt-

age sags, swells, and notches. On the other hand, they start to

present disadvantages in unbalanced operating conditions. In

the literature, various kinds of PLL methods have been tried to

overcome the aforementioned problems, such as enhanced PLL

(EPLL) and decoupled double SRF PLL. These methods are

complicated compared with the conventional PLL system, and

when the signal is distorted by harmonics, the bandwidth should

be reduced, thus increasing the time response. Moreover, the

start-up stage does not have a good dynamic response.

Three-phase PLL systems based on Akagis instantaneous

power pq theory [24],[25] have been intensely studied an-

alytically and experimentally, under both asymmetrical and

distorted supply conditions. The design criteria have also been

analyzed to tune their parameters. These PLL systems are

classied as pPLL and qPLL.

A modied classical qPLL closed-loop structure incorporat-

ing a feedforward action was presented and simulated in [26].

This feedforward action guarantees high dynamic estimation

0278-0046/$26.00 2011 IEEE

222 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 58, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

Fig. 2. qPLL system.

performance and the reduction of the residual estimation error

to zero.

This paper can be considered to be an extension of [26]. It

introduces and analyzes the effect of the frequency variation on

the proposed solution, showing the good performances obtained

during start-up under all input conditions and providing a com-

plete linear analysis of the system stability in order to dene

accurate controller parameter design criteria. Moreover, nu-

merical results have been obtained by comparing the proposed

technique with the standard qPLL algorithm and recent syn-

chronization techniques proposed in literature. Experimental

verications were also carried out under various input voltage

conditions. The proposed feedforward qPLL (FFqPLL) gives

fast and accurate phase and frequency detection of the posi-

tive sequence of the input signals, particularly in the start-up

stage, with rapid input variation, and under unbalanced utility

conditions. The simplicity of the structure makes the presented

phase-nding system suitable for digital implementation.

II. CONVENTIONAL PLL SYSTEM

A PLL is a device that is able to keep an output signal

synchronized in frequency, as well as in phase, with a reference

input signal. More precisely, the PLL is a servo system that

controls the phase of its output signal in order to minimize

the phase error between the output and reference phases. A

traditional PLL analysis system is based on a single input

system, as shown in Fig. 1. In the case of three-phase input

signals, a small simplication is needed and the inputs can eas-

ily be converted into a stationary plane through the Clarke

transformation or into a synchronously rotating reference frame

through the Park transformation. Starting from the -plane

representation of the three-phase input and adopting the space

vector representation proposed by Aredes in [23], the phase

error signal can be expressed as

u

d

(t) = (u

1

u

2

+u

1

u

2

) +j(u

1

u

2

u

1

u

2

). (1)

By applying Akagis instantaneous power theory [24], [25],

two different approaches can be adopted to estimate the input

signal phase angle. The rst uses the real part of u

d

and yields a

pPLL system, while the second uses the real part of u

d

to yield

a qPLL system.

The conceptual scheme of a classical qPLL system for a

utility interface is shown in Fig. 2, where

d,n

is the nominal

line pulsation. Referring to the following symmetrical voltage

system:

v

abc

= V [ sin sin

_

2

3

_

sin

_

+

2

3

_

] (2)

where V and are the amplitude and the phase angle, respec-

tively, Clarkes transformation is characterized by the following

matrix:

T

c

=

_

2

3

_

1 1/2 1/2

0

3/2

3/2

_

(3)

which gives rise to the voltage system (v

, v

)

v

=

_

3

2

V [ sin cos ] (4)

which represents the voltage system (2) in the plane. Then,

the algorithm in Fig. 2 can be used to calculate and regulate to

zero the quantity

q(t) = v

= 3/2 V sin(

q

) (5)

which is Akagis imaginary power associated both with the

voltage system (2) and the ctitious current system (i

, i

).

This represents a balanced current system with unitary ampli-

tude and phase angle

q

in the plane.

Due to the action of the LF [typically proportionalintegral

(PI) controller], the algorithm in Fig. 2 may reach two equi-

librium points under steady-state conditions. The former is

characterized by

q

=

q

= (6)

and is unstable. In fact, if a slight positive phase variation

occurs, then

q

> . For (5), q(t) becomes negative and the

action of the controller increases

q

. Likewise, if a slight

negative variation makes

q

< , then the algorithm further

reduces the value of

q

. The latter equilibrium point

q

= 0 (7)

is stable. In fact, if a slightly positive phase variation occurs,

making

q

> 0, for (5), q(t) becomes positive and the action

of the controller reduces

q

. Analogously, if a slight negative

variation makes

q

< 0, then the algorithm reduces the value

of

q

to zero.

The PI controller is used in conjunction with a feedforward

action at the nominal pulsation

d,n

and is saturated in order to

increase the dynamic performance of the qPLL and avoid phase

locking on an eventual interharmonic component of the voltage

system.

The conceptual scheme of a classical robust pPLL system for

a utility has the same structure as that in Fig. 2. In addition, this

algorithm relies on the transformation in (3), which is used to

obtain the voltage system (v

, v

calculates and regulates to zero the p(t) value dened as

p(t) = v

+v

= 3/2 V cos(

p

) (8)

which is Akagis real power ([4]), which is associated with

both the voltage system (2) and the ctitious current system

(i

, i

amplitude and phase angle

p

in the plane.

LICCARDO et al.: ROBUST AND FAST THREE-PHASE PLL TRACKING SYSTEM 223

Fig. 3. FFqPLL.

Moreover, it can be shown [20] that, due to the action of the

controller, the algorithm may reach two equilibrium points. The

former is characterized by

p

=

d

p

= /2 (9)

and is unstable. The latter, which is stable, is characterized by

p

=

d

p

= /2. (10)

All of the results that are presented next are for a qPLL

system, but are also applicable to a pPLL system.

A conventional PLL system implemented in an SRF uses a PI

controller to track the phase angle of the grid voltages. The con-

troller parameters represent a tradeoff between a fast dynamic

system providing quick synchronization and a slow dynamic

system providing an accurate ltered output. Therefore, under

ideal grid conditions, the conventional SRF-PLL gives good

results. Under distorted and/or unbalanced supply voltages, the

bandwidth of the PLL controller should be further reduced to

provide a good synchronization signal. However, reducing the

PLL bandwidth results in an increase in response time, which

means that the system cannot track the phase angle () quickly.

III. PROPOSED PHASE TRACKING SYSTEM

The proposed system is shown in Fig. 3. The idea is to

use an open-loop synchronization method as a forward action

for a modied classic qPLL. This tracking system has several

advantages in terms of dynamics.

A. Input Signal Analysis

Referring to the following asymmetrical and distorted volt-

age system, made of the sum of positive sequence and negative

sequence distorted systems:

v

a

=

+

k=1

[V

d,k

sin(

d,k

) +V

i,k

sin(

i,k

)]

v

b

=

+

k=1

_

V

d,k

sin

_

d,k

2

3

k

_

+V

i,k

sin

_

i,k

+

2

3

k

__

v

c

=

+

k=1

_

V

d,k

sin

_

d,k

+

2

3

k

_

+V

i,k

sin

_

i,k

2

3

k

__

(11)

where V

d,k

and V

i,k

are the amplitude of the kth harmonic com-

ponent of the aforementioned positive and negative sequence

Fig. 4. Feedforward action.

systems and

d,k

and

i,k

are their phase angles, respectively. If

V

d,k

= 0 for k > 1 and V

i,k

= 0 for any k, then (11) coincides

with (2). With this assumption, q(t) can be expressed as

q(t)=

3

2

+

k=1

V

d,k

sin(

d,k

d,q

)+

3

2

+

k=1

V

i,k

sin(

i,k

d,q

).

(12)

This equation can be divided into a dc component to be

controlled to zero and a disturbance component as follows:

q(t) =q(t) + q(t)

q(t) =

3

2

V

d,1

sin(

d,1

d,q

)

q(t) =

3

2

+

k=2

V

d,k

sin(

d,k

d,q

)

+

3

2

+

k=1

V

i,k

sin(

i,k

+

d,q

). (13)

The disturbance component q(t) consists of the innite sum

of the sinusoidal signals at frequency multiples of the line

frequency, around the stable equilibrium point (7).

For any type of voltage system, it is possible to dene the

quantity q(t) and, thus, the lower disturbance frequency. This

is useful information for the LF design. When the system is

affected by an interharmonic component, the situation is more

critical because q(t) may oscillate at a very low frequency.

B. Feedforward Action

The feedforward action shown in Fig. 4 guarantees the high

dynamic performance of the phase locking in the start-up stage,

as well as the low error in the steady state, in the presence of

asymmetrical and distorted supply voltage systems. Moreover,

it is possible to estimate the frequency with high precision and

fast dynamics. By taking into consideration the voltage system

(2), whose representation in the plane is expressed by (4),

and applying a reference rotation synchronous with the nominal

line frequency, the dq representation is obtained

_

v

d

v

q

_

=

_

sin

n

cos

n

cos

n

sin

n

_ _

v

_

=

_

3

2

cos(

d,1

n

)

. .

=v

d

cos(

d,1

+

n

)

. .

= v

d

sin(

d,1

n

)

. .

=v

q

+sin(

d,1

+

n

)

. .

= v

q

(14)

where

n

= 2f

n

t is the phase related to the nominal frequency

(e.g., 50Hz). The phase relatedtothe real supplyfrequencyf

d,1

is

d,1

= 2f

d,1

t +

0

d

(15)

224 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 58, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

where

0

d

is the initial phase of the positive sequence of the

supply voltage system (2). By low-pass ltering (14) and taking

into account that the lower frequency to eliminate is related to

f

d,1

+f

n

, the following quantities are obtained:

v

d

=

_

3

2

cos

_

2 f t +

lpf

+

0

d

_

=

_

3

2

cos(

f

)

v

q

=

_

3

2

sin

_

2 f t +

lpf

+

0

d

_

=

_

3

2

sin(

f

) (16)

where f = f

d,1

f

n

and

lpf

is the phase delay introduced

by LPF

f

. By evaluating the arctangent of v

q

on v

d

, it is

possible to extract

f

. If the supply voltage frequency and the

nominal one are the same, f = 0,

lpf

= 0, and the extracted

value represents the initial phase. If f = 0, this implies that

lpf

= 0 and a phase estimation error is obtained. In this case,

the feedback action will compensate for the error. In any case,

summing to

f

, i.e., the nominal phase,

d,1

+

lpf

is obtained.

After deriving this quantity, the supply voltage frequency can be

evaluated. The dynamic response and the steady-state precision

are strictly connected to the LPF

f

cutoff frequency chosen.

The bandwidth and the order of the LPF

f

must be deter-

mined with reference to the voltage system (11), considering

that the dq components present a disturbance component, as in

v

d

=

3

2

+

k=2

V

d,k

cos(

d,k

n

)

3

2

+

k=i

V

i,k

cos(

i,k

+

n

) (17)

v

q

=

3

2

+

k=2

V

d,k

sin(

d,k

n

)

+

3

2

+

k=i

V

i,k

sin(

i,k

+

n

). (18)

Therefore, it must be taken into account that the lower

frequency involved in (17) and (18) is equal to the line fre-

quency and is due to the second-order harmonic of the negative

sequence system. Even more critical is the situation connected

to the voltage system when affected by an interharmonic

component. In fact, v

d

and v

q

may oscillate at a very low

frequency when the interharmonic component is located near

the component at the line frequency.

C. Feedback Action

As mentioned before, if the supply frequency is not exactly

equal to its nominal value, v

d

and v

q

in (14) are not dc

quantities. Therefore, during the low-pass ltering, they are

affected by the phase distortion of LPF

f

and

lpf

= 0. Hence,

the resulting angle

f

is not exactly equal to

d,1

and is affected

by a constant estimation error for a constant line frequency

different from f

d,n

. In order to reduce this residual estimation

error to zero, the use of the feedback action, based on the

conventional PLL scheme shown in Fig. 3, is proposed. Due

to the aforementioned feedforward action, this last ensures

a tracking error equal to zero for a constant line frequency

different from f

n

.

Fig. 5. Linearized model of the FFqPLL.

In this case, the gain k

p

of the controller and the time constant

f

of the LPF have to be determined while also taking into

account the inuence of the residual voltage disturbance effects

on the feedforward action on

d

.

IV. LINEAR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA

This section discusses considerations about the design crite-

ria of the proposed phase-locking system.

The FFqPLL can be modeled in the Laplace domain, as

shown in Fig. 5. The feedforward transfer function G(s) de-

pends only on the associated LPF LPF

f

. The poles of this lter

are external to the feedback loop. Hence, the presence of the

feedforward action is not relevant in terms of stability. Thus, in

the following analysis, it will not be considered. However, the

stability analysis is very similar to a conventional qPLL.

The qPLL and pPLL can be analyzed using the same ap-

proach. For this reason, only the former will be considered in

this section. A small tracking error is hypothesized near the

equilibrium point, i.e.,

d,q

=

d

. (19)

It is worth noting that the pPLL also admits a linearization

model with the structure of the system in Fig. 5, near the

equilibrium point

d,p

= /2. (20)

Using the model in Fig. 5, it is possible to evaluate the

transfer functions describing the PLL behavior. The transfer

function considered for the rst-order low-pass lter and the

PI controller are reported in

PI = k

p

+

k

i

s

LPF =

1

1 +s

f

. (21)

A. Stability

The system stability can be studied by evaluating transfer

function

d,q

, as shown in

d,q

(s) = F

1

(s)

d,1

(s) +F

2

(s)

n

(s) +F

3

(s)

Q(s) (22)

where

F

1

(s) =

V

d,1

(k

p

s +k

i

)

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

(23)

F

2

(s) =

G(s)

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

(24)

F

3

(s) =

k

p

s +k

i

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

. (25)

LICCARDO et al.: ROBUST AND FAST THREE-PHASE PLL TRACKING SYSTEM 225

Fig. 6. Maximum k

i

value versus k

p

and LPF cutting frequency f

t

.

The system is stable if the characteristic polynomial (26)

only has roots with negative real parts

p(s) = s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

. (26)

Using the Routh criteria, the stability is guaranteed if condi-

tion (27) is veried

k

p

k

i

>

f

. (27)

The previous equation shows that the stability is dependent

on the PI and LPF parameters. A fast graphical approach useful

for designing the system is shown in Fig. 6. For the selected k

p

and lter cutting frequency f

t

, the graph reports the maximum

admissible k

i

values for a stable system.

B. Error Estimation

The error dynamic can be analyzed by means of

E(s) = E

1

(s)

d,1

(s) +E

2

(s)

n

(s) +E

3

(s)

Q(s) (28)

where

E

1

(s) =

(1 +s

f

)s

2

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

(29)

E

2

(s) =

G(s)

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

(30)

E

3

(s) =

k

p

s +k

i

s

3

f

+s

2

+

3

2

V

d,1

k

p

s +

3

2

V

d,1

k

i

. (31)

Equation (28) can also be used to evaluate the steady-state

error. By considering the feedforward input

n

(s) and the

phase input

d,1

(s) as ramp inputs, the steady-state error is

reported in

e

(t) = e

1

+e

2

+

n

i=1

A

qi

|E

3

(j

qi

)|

sin (

qi

t +

qi

+Arg [E

3

(j

qi

)]) (32)

TABLE I

PLL PARAMETERS

where the presence of n generic disturbances have been consid-

ered, as shown in

q(t) =

n

i=1

A

qi

sin(

qi

t +

qi

) (33)

according to the nal value theorem

e

1

= lim

s0

sE

1

(s)

d,1

s

2

= 0 e

2

= lim

s0

sE

2

(s)

n

s

2

0. (34)

In (34), e

2

can be considered to be almost equal to zero

because, when the gains of transfer functions (30) and (31) are

compared, the rst one always presents a higher attenuation in

the disturbed frequency range.

It is clear from (32) and (34) that if the voltage is not

contaminated by disturbances such as harmonics or an un-

balance, the steady-state error is zero. Otherwise, it depends

on the disturbance entity according to (32). The designer can

use the aforementioned equations for the desired disturbance

attenuation and, thus, the desired steady-state error.

If the ltering of

Q(s) is delegated to the PI controller as in

a conventional PLL, an analysis can be made by evaluating all

of the transfer functions with

f

= 0. In this case, the system

is always stable and k

i

and k

p

have to be chosen accurately in

order to have an acceptable disturbance attenuation.

The presence of the lter leads to better results in terms

of disturbance attenuation, such as unbalances. However, the

system bandwidth is smaller, and therefore, the dynamic re-

sponse is reduced. Adding the feedforward action enhances the

dynamic response.

V. SIMULATION RESULTS

In this section, several simulation results are shown in order

to validate the analysis reported in the previous section and to

compare the conventional qPLL with the proposed topology.

These numerical simulations were obtained from Simulink

models. The parameters used are reported in Table I.

A. Start-Up

As a rst case, a noncontaminated direct sequence voltage

can be considered with amplitude V

d

= 100 V. The considered

initial phase values (

d

) are /8, /4, and /2.

The start-up stage will be considered in order to evaluate the

phase locking. All of the results are shown in Figs. 79. These

show that, as stated in Section I, the steady-state error is zero in

the case of a nondistorted voltage.

In all of the simulation results, it is possible to observe that

the FFqPLL error is always smaller than the classical qPLL,

independently from the initial phase. This means that, during

the start-up stage, the synchronization error is reduced, leading

to a higher power factor.

226 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 58, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

Fig. 7.

d

= /8. (1) Phase error. (2) qPLL output. (3) FFqPLL output.

Fig. 8.

d

= /4 phase error.

Fig. 9.

d

= /2 phase error.

In order to test the start-up stage even when a disturbance is

present, simulations were carried out in the case of a nonideal

supply. The results shown in Fig. 10(a)(1) show the start-up

phase error in the case of a nonideal supply frequency of

48 Hz. Moreover, in Fig. 10(b)(1) and (c)(1), the presence

of a 30% unbalance and 1-Hz subharmonic is considered.

The respective locked frequencies are shown in Fig. 10(a)(2),

10(b)(2), and 10(c)(2). The simulation results show that, even

in the case of nonideal voltages, the FFqPLL presents a smaller

error in the start-up period.

B. Disturbed Voltage

In order to evaluate the performance of the PLL in a dis-

torted network, a disturbed voltage is considered in the next

simulations.

1) Unbalance: The presence of a 30% unbalance can be

analyzed considering V

d

= 100 V and V

i

= 30 V. The initial

phases considered in the simulations are

d

= 0 and

I

= 0.

In order to evaluate the benets of the proposed method, the

parameters reported in Table I have been chosen to give the

same system dynamics.

LICCARDO et al.: ROBUST AND FAST THREE-PHASE PLL TRACKING SYSTEM 227

Fig. 10. Start-up in nonideal conditions.

Fig. 11. Error E

3

(s) bode diagram.

The E

3

(s) bode diagram is shown in Fig. 11 to evaluate the

steady-state error. In this case, the disturbance is

q(t) =

3

2

30 sin(2100t +

d

+

i

). (35)

The amplitude attenuation is |E

3

(j2100)|

dB

= 78; there-

fore, the resultant steady-state error amplitude is 0.0057 rad.

The disturbance is introduced at 1 s. Fig. 12(1) shows the

error dynamics, with an enlargement shown in Fig. 12(2). In

the latter gure, only the effect of E

3

(s) is appreciable, while

the error due to E

2

(s) is negligible, as shown in Section IV.

Fig. 12. 30% unbalancephase error. (1) Phase error. (2) Phase-error

enlargement.

It is possible to observe that the FFqPLL and the conventional

PLL have the same dynamics, but the former presents a higher

attenuation as expected.

228 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 58, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

Fig. 13. Phase error for 10% fth and 5% eleventh harmonics.

d

= 0,

i,5

= 0, and

i,11

= 0.

Fig. 14. Phase error for 10% subharmonic.

Fig. 15. Supply frequency variation.

2) Harmonics: The presence of harmonics can also be con-

sidered in this section. A 10% fth harmonic and a 5% eleventh

harmonic are added to the fundamental at 1 s. The PLLs

parameters are the same as those in the case of unbalance.

The results are shown in Fig. 13.

3) Subharmonics: The performances of the PLLs in the

presence of 10% subharmonic oscillations at a very low fre-

quency (1 Hz) are illustrated in this case. Fig. 14 shows the

simulation results.

4) Supply Frequency Variation: To test the performance of

the proposed PLL during supply frequency variation, a 2-Hz

drop of 2-s duration was given at 0.4 s. The settling time was

found to be about 120 ms (Fig. 15).

In all of the aforementioned simulations, the conventional

qPLL and the FFqPLL successfully locked the desired phase

even under distorted conditions. Comparing the two systems,

the FFqPLL has shown improved performance, owing to the

benets of the error ltering and the feedforward action. In fact,

the presence of the feedforward action enhances the system

dynamics, which are reduced by the LPF needed to have a small

steady-state error.

Compared with the new PLL topologies, such as ANF based

or EPLL, the proposed technique seems to show comparable

TABLE II

PLL PARAMETERS

results in terms of dynamics and steady-state error. However,

FFqPLL presents higher dynamics in the start-up stage under

all nonideal supply conditions. Moreover, the simplicity of

FFqPLL makes this an interesting technique for both analog

and digital implementations.

Finally, the simulation results conrm the linear analysis

made in Section IV.

VI. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

In this section, several experimental results are presented.

The qPLL and the FFqPLL were implemented with xed-point

arithmetic in a TMS320F240 DSP using an analog-to-digital

converter at a 10-kHz sampling frequency. A controlled power

source was employed to generate the desired input voltage. The

parameters used are reported in Table II.

LICCARDO et al.: ROBUST AND FAST THREE-PHASE PLL TRACKING SYSTEM 229

Fig. 16. Nondistorted input voltage. (1) qPLL output. (2) FFqPLL output. (3) qPLL phase error. (4) qPLL phase error.

Fig. 17. 12.5% unbalanced input voltage. (1) qPLL output. (2) FFqPLL output. (3) qPLL phase error. (4) qPLL phase error.

In order to compare the experimental and simulation results,

the same conditions as those in the previous section were con-

sidered for the input voltage. The results shown in Figs. 1619

show that the experimental results match the numerical ones.

Each gure shows that the PLL outputs overlapped with the

reference phase voltage and that the evaluated PLL error is

comparable with that of the simulation.

VII. CONCLUSION

In this paper, a robust and fast three-phase tracking sys-

tem has been shown. The proposed PLL structure for the

estimation of the phase angle of the fundamental positive

sequence of the supply voltage system consists of feedfor-

ward and feedback actions. This PLL, compared with the

classical qPLL and pPLL structures, improves the dynamic

and steady-state estimation performances. The start-up stage

is very fast in any utility condition, and the performances

in unbalanced conditions are better than conventional PLL

systems and are comparable with the most recent algorithms

proposed in the literature. Moreover, the proposed method

tracks the frequency variations well. A steady-state error analy-

sis in the Laplace domain was performed to dene the design

criteria.

Simulation and experimental results were compared and

showed good agreement.

230 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 58, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

Fig. 18. 10% fth and 5% eleventh harmonics in input voltage. (1) qPLL output. (2) FFqPLL output. (3) qPLL phase error. (4) qPLL phase error.

Fig. 19. 10% subharmonics at 1 Hz in input voltage. (1) qPLL output. (2) FFqPLL output. (3) qPLL phase error. (4) qPLL phase error.

The proposed PLL can be employed in any supply voltage

condition in order to lock the positive sequence component,

and the simplicity of this structure makes the presented phase-

locking system suitable for digital implementation.

REFERENCES

[1] G. C. Paap, Symmetrical components in the time domain and their appli-

cation to power network calculations, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15,

no. 2, pp. 522528, May 2000.

[2] B. Singh, K. Al-Haddad, and A. Chandra, A review of active lters for

power quality improvement, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 46, no. 5,

pp. 960971, Oct. 2001.

[3] G. Bonifacio, A. Lo Schiavo, P. Marino, and A. Testa, A new high

performance shunt active lter based on digital control, in Proc. IEEE

PES Winter Meeting, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 29612966.

[4] S.-K. Chung, A phase tracking system for three phase utility interface

inverters, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 431438,

May 2000.

[5] F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and A. V. Timbus, Overview

of control and grid synchronization for distributed power generation

systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 13941409,

Oct. 2006.

[6] F. Liccardo, P. Marino, and M. Trigianese, An efcient connection be-

tween grid and wind farm by means an Synchronous AFE, in Proc.

SPEEDAM Symp., Taormina, Italy, 2006, pp. 12111216.

[7] M. Karimi-Ghartemani and M. R. Iravani, A method for synchroniza-

tion of power electronic converters in polluted and variable-frequency

environments, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 12631270,

Aug. 2004.

[8] R. M. Santos Filho, P. F. Seixas, P. C. Cortizo, L. A. B. Torres, and

A. F. Souza, Comparison of three single-phase PLL algorithms for UPS

applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 29232932,

Aug. 2008.

LICCARDO et al.: ROBUST AND FAST THREE-PHASE PLL TRACKING SYSTEM 231

[9] M. A. Perez, J. R. Espinoza, L. A. Moran, M. A. Torres, and E. A. Araya,

A robust phase-locked loop algorithm to synchronize static-power con-

verters with polluted AC systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55,

no. 5, pp. 21852192, May 2008.

[10] A. M. Salamah, S. J. Finney, and B. W. Williams, Three-phase phase-

lock loop for distorted utilities, IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 1, no. 6,

pp. 937945, Nov. 2007.

[11] V. Kaura and V. Blasko, Operation of a phase locked loop system under

distorted utility conditions, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 58

63, Jan./Feb. 1997.

[12] A. V. Timbus, M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, and P. Rodriguez,

PLL algorithm for power generation systems robust to grid faults, in

Proc. IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., 2006, pp. 13601366.

[13] J. M. Espi Huerta, J. Castello, J. R. Fischer, and R. Garcia-Gil, A syn-

chronous reference frame robust predictive current control for three-phase

grid-connected invert, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 954

962, Mar. 2010.

[14] H. Song and K. Nam, Instantaneous phase-angle estimation algo-

rithm under unbalanced voltage-sag conditions, Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng.,

vol. 147, no. 6, pp. 409415, Nov. 2000.

[15] D. Yazdani, A. Bakhshai, G. Joos, and M. Mojiri, A nonlinear adaptive

synchronization technique for grid-connected distributed energy sources,

IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 21812186, Jul. 2008.

[16] D. Yazdani, M. Mojiri, A. Bakhshai, and G. Joos, A fast and accurate

synchronization technique for extraction of symmetrical components,

IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 674684, Mar. 2009.

[17] D. Jovcic, Phase locked loop system for FACTS, IEEE Trans. Power

Syst., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 11161124, Aug. 2003.

[18] S. Shinnaka, A robust single-phase PLL system with stable and

fast tracking, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 624633,

Mar./Apr. 2008.

[19] P. Rodriguez, J. Pou, J. Bergas, J. I. Candela, R. P. Burgos, and

D. Boroyevich, Decoupled double synchronous reference frame PLL for

power converters control, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 2,

pp. 584592, Mar. 2007.

[20] G.-C. Hsieh and J. C. Hung, Phase-locked loop techniques. A survey,

IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 609615, Dec. 1996.

[21] M. Karimi-Ghartemani and M. R. Iravani, A new phase-locked loop

(PLL) system, in Proc. 44th IEEE MWSCAS, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 421424.

[22] D. R. Costa, L. G. B. Rolim, and M. Aredes, Analysis and software

implementation of a robust synchronism circuit-PLL circuit, in Proc.

IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., 2003, vol. 1, pp. 292297.

[23] L. G. B. Rolim, D. R. da Costa, and M. Aredes, Analysis and soft-

ware implementation of a robust synchronizing PLL circuit based on the

pq theory, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 19191926,

Dec. 2006.

[24] H. Akagi, Y. Kanazawa, and A. Nabae, Generalized theory of the in-

stantaneous reactive power in three-phase circuits, in Proc. IPEC, 1983,

pp. 13751386.

[25] H. Akagi, Y. Kanazawa, and A. Nabae, Instantaneous reactive power

compensator comprising switching devices without energy storage com-

ponents, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. IA-20, no. 3, pp. 625630,

May/Jun. 1984.

[26] F. Liccardo, P. Marino, C. Schiano, and N. Visciano, A new robust

phase tracking system for asymmetrical and distorted three phase net-

works, in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Harmon. Quality Power, Sep. 1215,

2004, pp. 525530.

Felice Liccardo was born in Naples, Italy, on May 8,

1975. He received the M.Sc. degree in computer

science engineering from the University of Naples

Federico II, Naples, in 2001 and the Ph.D. degree

in electrical energy conversion from the Second Uni-

versity of Naples, Aversa, Italy, in 2005.

He is currently with the Second University of

Naples. His research interests include power elec-

tronic converters for power quality improvement.

Pompeo Marino was born in Frosinone, Italy, on

April 8, 1948. He received the M.Sc. degree in elec-

tronics engineering from the University of Naples

Federico II, Naples, Italy, in 1973.

He is a Professor in industrial electronics and

electrical drives with the Dipartimento di Ingegne-

ria dellInformazione, Second University of Naples,

Aversa, Italy. He is engaged in research works on

electrical power system reliability and harmonic

analysis. His interests include power converter de-

sign, ac and dc drives, and motion control.

Giuliano Raimondo was born in Naples, Italy, on

January 23, 1983. He received the B.Sc. and M.Sc.

degrees in electronics engineering from the Second

University of Naples, Aversa, Italy, in 2005 and

2008, respectively, where he is currently working to-

ward the Ph.D. degree and in the Laboratoire Plasma

et Conversion dEnergie, University of Toulouse,

Toulouse, France.

His research interests include digital control and

power electronic converters for power quality im-

provement in railway networks.

## Mult mai mult decât documente.

Descoperiți tot ce are Scribd de oferit, inclusiv cărți și cărți audio de la editori majori.

Anulați oricând.