Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
March, 2009
David K Barton
Captions and foreword by Dr Carlo Kopp Images by Miroslav Gyrsi Excerpted with permission from the Microwave Journal, May 1994
1994, Microwave Journal; 2009 David K Barton; 2009 Carlo Kopp Foreword David K Barton is one of the United States' most experienced and accomplished innovators in radar design and engineering, and has authored many important radar theory texts. I n 1994 the Microw ave Journal published his technical report covering a range of Russian radar designs, based largely on interview s w ith the original lead designers and architects of these systems. T his valuable w ork remains to date the most exact, accurate and concise technical summary of the design rationale for these systems ever published in the unclassified domain. By arrangement w ith the Microw ave Journal and David Barton, APA is pleased to provide this HT ML excerpt and the original 1994 w ork to a contemporary audience.
David K. Barton, The 1993 Moscow Airshow, Special Report, Microwave Journal, May, 1994 [PDF 11.4 MB]
MWJ Editor's note [1994]: T his special report is the result of a visit by the author to the Moscow 1993 Air Show , w hich w as held from August 31 to September 5, 1993. T he show w as held at the military airfield near Ramenskoye, 50 km east of Moscow . T he author w as accompanied by Drs. Alexander Leonov and Sergey Leonov and by Prof. Alexander A. Lemansky, scientific director of Scientific lndustrial Corp., ALMAZ, a manufacturer of radar equipment based in Moscow . His invitation w as issued on behalf of the Airshow Organizing Committee by A. Systzov, vice president of AO AVI APROM, a joint stock company headquartered in Moscow . T he material contained in this special report is similar to photos and descriptions in classified documents, but this is the first time such photos and descriptions have been available to a general audience. T he four-color photos of equipment described in the report appear as a three-page photo exposition S-300PMU1 (SA-10/20) System 64N6 Big Bird T hree-Dimensional Surveillance Radar
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
54K6E1 Command Post 30N6E1 Fire Control Radar S-300PMU1 (Flap Lid / T omb Stone) 5N63S/30N6E1 Flap Lid / T omb Stone Antennas and Feeds SA-10/20 (Grumble/Gargoyle) 48N6E/E1/E2 Missile S-300PMU1 48N6E1 Missile and 5P85SU/DU T EL S-300V/VM (SA-12/23) System 9S15/9S15M/MT Obzor 1/2/3 Bill Board T hree-Dimensional Surveillance Radar 9S15 Obzor 3 / Bill Board 3D Radar 9S32/32M Grill Pan Fire Control Radar 9S32 Grill Pan Antennas and Feeds 9A82 Giant T ELAR 9A83 Gladiator T ELAR 9A82 and 9A83 T ELAR Antennas Endnotes T he Author
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
A late model 64N6E2 Big Bird 3D surveillance radar on display. Below , note the booms and horns feeding the transmissive array (Wikipedia images).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
64N6E2 Bid Bird antenna in stow ed position. T he outer panels fold inw ard, the booms carrying the feed horns fold dow n flush w ith the array, and the w hole assembly folds forw ard and level w ith the roof of the cabin. Note the w aveguides and rotational couplers feeding the booms. Deploy/stow images here [1], [2] (Russian internet images).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Late model 30N6E1 T omb Stone in deployed configuration w ith elevated datalink mast (Chinese internet image).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
The array is mounted on a rotatable turret behind the cab of the [MAZ7910] vehicle and in front of the fixed equipment shelter. The RF and lF equipment is mounted within the turret, eliminating rotary joints and long runs of waveguide or coaxial cable for receiver signals.
Flap Lid antenna feed arrangement by David K Barton, original artw ork as used in Microw ave Journal, May 1994, provided by author (I mage 1994, 2009 David K Barton).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Early model 5N63 Flap Lid tow ed variant on display at the Moscow District PVO Museum at Zarya, near Moscow . Note the exposed polarisation screen in the space feed (I mage Miroslav Gyrsi). The feed, shown in the above image, consists of two linearly polarized horns, a polarisationsensitive reflector, and a circular polarizing grid. The receive horn cluster is on the axis of the array and vertically polarized. The received signal polarisation, which is circular (for example, right-hand) as it passes through the main array, is converted to vertical by the polarizing grid, which is a curved element immediately within the plastic enclosure. The transmit horn is horizontally polarized and is located near the bottom of the plastic enclosure. It illuminates the polarization-sensitive reflector. the plane of which is oriented at about 45- relative to the array axis and which is invisible to the received wave. The polarizing grid transforms the transmitted wave into circular polarization with sense opposite to that of the received wave (for example, left-hand). This transformation provides reciprocal operation of the Faraday rotator phase shifters. The orthogonal polarizations of the transmitted and received waves provide the duplexer isolation normally supplied by a circulator, reducing the round-trip RF loss by 1 dB. Reciprocal operation is an important feature of this array, since the waveform used for target tracking uses bursts at high PRF (100 kHz) to overcome clutter. The clutter attenuation of the system is 100 dB. making possible long range target detection in competition with ground clutter or rain from within the 1500 m unambiguous range of the waveform. As a
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
result of this operating mode, the radar can reject moving clutter from rain, chaff and birds using unambiguous Doppler filtering, as do the continuous wave radars in US systems, such as Hawk. The monopulse receive feed uses six horns. The two center horns are each excited in modes, one for the sum channel and one for the azimuth difference. Thus, the feed is equivalent ot the 12-horn feed described by P.W. Hannan in his 1961 paper. Since received signal is linearly polarized at this feed, multimode operation is possible, and illumination function can be controlled to minimize sidelobes and spillover. [1] two the the the
A late model 30N6E1 T omb Stone series engagement radar in deployed position. T he space feed comprises a complex monopulse arrangement, concealed under a dielectric lens (I mages Miroslav Gyrsi).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
30N6E series space feed dielectric lens and collapsible shroud (I mages Miroslav Gyrsi).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
30N6-1 series space feed dielectric lens and collapsible shroud (images Miroslav Gyrsi).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Early model 5N63S Flap Lid B operated by the ByeloRussian air defence forces (images Miroslav Gyrsi).
Note the smaller octagonal array superceded by the rectangular design in the later 30N6 series.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Early model 30N6-1 Flap Lid B/C deployed in an operational environment. Camouflage netting is used typically to conceal all fixed components of the installation.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
T his image show s the antennas stow ed, and the generator ports open for operation.
T he cutaw ay display 48N6E2 canister is in the background, in the forground are the 9M96E1/E2 interceptor missiles developed for the S-300PMU2 Favorit and S-400 (Chinese internet images).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
S-300PMU1 5P85SU T EL of the PLA stow ed and deploying. Early model T ELs used an arrangement w ith a 'smart' T EL each controlling a pair of 'dumb' T ELs. I n more recent configurations all T ELs are 'smart' and autonomous (Chinese internet images).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
T he 9S32 Grill Pan engagement radar used w ith the S-300V/VM / SA-12/23 employs much the same feed arrangement as the 5N63/63S/30N6E Flap Lid engagement radar used w ith the S-300P/PS/PM/PMU/PMU1/2 / SA-10/20 systems (via Smotr).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Above 9S15MT Bill Board (image Miroslav Gyrsi) . Additional images [1], [2]. Below stow operation (via Smotr).
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
withstand leakage powers of several hundred Watts without damage and with nearinstantaneous recovery to full gain and sensitivity when the transmitted pulse ends. Thus, the loss attributed to solid-state protective devices commonly required in Western radars is also absent. The total round trip RF loss from transmitter tube to low noise receiver (excluding propagation loss in the atmosphere) is held to 3 dB, in contrast to the 7 to 12 dB found in comparable Western systems. The reduced cost and loss, and the ability to transmit and process (with high clutter attenuation) high-PRF waveforms over long dwells, are made possible by the assignment to the radar of a limited number of tracks and very limited search capability in, contrast to the Western preference for multifunction array radars. The cost of separate search radars must be accepted in such a system. lt is perhaps the reduced emphasis placed by the Russian military on life-cycle costs of vehicles and personnel that permits them to use this approach. A nother possible explanation is the Russian military's insistence on high performance against targets of low cross section in environments containing rain, chaff and other sources of clutter, an almost insoluble problem when the multifunction approach is adopted.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
9S32 Grill Pan circular polarised antenna feeds, the upper is for aircraft targets, the low er for T BM targets.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
Endnotes
[1] P.W.Hanna, "Optimum Feeds for All Three Modes of a Monopulse Antenna," IRE Trans. Ant. Propagation,AP-9, No.5 , Sept.1961, pp.444-461.
The Author
David K. Barton received his AB degree in physics from Harvard College in 1949. From 1949 to 1984, he held positions in both government and industry, including Signal Corps. assignments to W hite Sands Missile Range and Evans Signal Laboratory, and positions at RCA and Raytheon Co. Since 1984, Barton has been vice president for engineering with ANRO Engineering Inc. His work has included studies of foreign radar technology, as well as consulting in areas of radar for several major aerospace companies.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
In addition, he lectured in radar for the Continuing Engineering Education Program at George Washington University. ln 1958, he was the first recipient of RCA's David W. Sarnoff Award for Outstanding Achievement in Engineering. ln 1961, Barton received the M. Barry Carlton Award of the IRE Professional Group on military electronics. He received the IEEE Centennial Medal in 1984, and during 1987 to 1988 was the distinguished microwave lecturer for the IEEE MTT-9. From 1979 to 1982, he also served on the Air Force Studies Board of the National Academy of Sciences. From 1989 to 1993, Barton was a member of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. At present, he is a member of the review board for the Army Research Laboratorv.
Artwork, graphic design, layout and text 2004 - 2012 Carlo Kopp; Text 2004 - 2012 Peter Goon; All rights reserved. Recommended browsers. Contact webmaster. Site navigation hints. Current hot topics. Site Update Status: $Revision: 1.670 $ Site History: Notices and Updates / NLA Pandora Archive
Save Page as PDF
Select Language
Powered by
Translate
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com