FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

FYP-1 SEMINAR EVALUATION FORM Reminder:

1. 2. Students must fill in personal and project particulars before giving this form to the panel of evaluators. Presentation time is 8 minutes. Q & A session is 5 minutes.

FYP 1-3

Student Name: Mohd Hafiz Zainol Abidin Project Title: Car Smart Security System SUBJECT

Program: SEE

I/C No. 820812-07-5141 Supervisor: En. Camallil MARKS ! Right is max, left is min (9) 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 (9) 1 1 1 (8) 0 1 1 (6) 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 (8) 0 0 0 0
/40

Objective, scope and problem statement (PO3):

Objective Scope Problem statement Project Background (Theory, Motivation) Related Work (Existing, Current or Novel) References (Reliable References) Gantt Chart/Plan Project Flow (Step) Method (Technique or Algorithm) Expected Outcome Preliminary Result Confidence (Fluent, Pace, Eye contact, Body Language) Delivery (Intonation, Understandable, Audible, Timing) Visual Aids (Power Point realistic and comprehensive) Q & A (Defense Capability)
TOTAL MARKS =

3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 0

Literature review (PO8):

Research methodology (PO3):

0 0 0 0

Outcome (PO3):

Communication skills (PO6):

Evaluators comments/suggestions:

Name and examiners signature: *** Detail rubric in Appendix 1

Date:

This form must be returned to the relevant FYP coordinator as soon as possible.

Appendix 1 : Rubrics for FYP 1-3 Form

Items Objective and Scope Problem statement Project Background Related Work References Research Plan/ Gantt Chart Project Flow Method Expected Outcome Preliminary Result Confidence Delivery 2 Points: Fluency, pace, body language and eye contact are excellent 2 Points: Excellent timing and intonation. Presentation is understandable and audible 2 Points: Realistic and comprehensive visual aid. Suitable choice of slides and font. 2 Points: Questions are answered very well. Students are able to defend and justify their answers. 2 Points: Complete and clear 3 Points: Complete and clear 3 Points: Clear on the steps to be taken. 3 Points: The projects output is clearly defined and realistic 3 Points: Shows sufficient amount of preliminary result/progress 3 Points: Valid, relevant and sufficient amount of references. 3 Points: Work is current and novel 3 Points : Clear and realistic 3 Points: Significant and described clearly 3 Points: Good, comprehensive project background 2 points: Clear but unrealistic 2 Points: Significant but not described clearly 2 points: Moderate amount of background and not comprehensive. 2 points: Similar work exists but differences have been described clearly. 2 points: Valid, relevant but insufficient amount of references 1 points: Incomplete OR unclear 2 points: Complete or not clear 2 points: Steps are clear but unrealistic approach 2 points: The projects output is clearly defined but unrealistic 2 points: Show some preliminary result/progress but insufficient 1 point: Fluency, pace, body language and eye contact are satisfactory 1 point: Acceptable timing and intonation. Presentation is audible but some difficulties in understanding. 1 point: Realistic and comprehensive visual aid. Choice of presentation slides is reasonable. 1 point: Some questions are not answered very well. Students have some difficulties to defend and justify their answers. Excellent Moderate Satisfactory 1 point: Not clear 1 point: Insignificant 1 point: Very little project background shown 1 point: Existing similar work has been attempted before 1 point : Invalid or irrelevant references

Unsatisfactory

0 point: Not explained 0 point: Not explained

0 point: Not explained

0 point: Not found

1 point: Incomplete 1 point: Not clear on the steps or methods 1 point: The projects output is unclear 1 point : Insufficient or unrelated preliminary results presented

0 point: Invalid and insufficient amount of references. Website references are invalid 0 point: Not found 0 point: Not explained / found 0 point: Not explained

0 point: Not explained

0 point: No preliminary result

0 point: Poor efforts on the fluency, pace, body language and eye contact 0 point: Poor delivery and presentation is not understandable at all.

Visual Aid

0 point: Poor choice of presentation slides.

Question & Answers

0 point: All questions are not answered. Students cannot defend and justify their answers.