Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Higher Creativity from Willis Harman, Ph.D. and Howard Rheingold present a model for idea processing
where the consciousness and its counterpart the unconscious team up. Common knowledge likes to
ignore the co-operation of the unconscious and it’s key role in producing innovation. But they theorize
that the rational alone lacks functionality to activate and foster creative thought. Their case studies
and research into creative breakthroughs shows that the yin-yang of the two sides of the mind work in
accord to collect and process data from the senses culminating in breakthrough innovation.
Presentation of creators independent of activity, area and era shows that the dual teamwork can be
promoted through improvement in the teamwork within the mind.
“In their autobiographies and memoranda, many artists and creative geniuses single out one or more
insights as being somehow different from their “normal working day” moments of inspiration.” 1
Knowledge of these moments is “not so much suppressed as repressed. The evidence itself is not
hidden.” 2 [4]
“By looking closely at what people have said about these moments, some guiding principle can be
discerned by which it is possible to integrate more scientific findings relating to consciousness and
creativity and derive an overall pattern toward which anyone can apply to achieve or increase the
incidence of their personal breakthroughs.” 3
British writer Graham Wallas in his 1926 book The Art of Thought presents one of the earliest
paradigms for the model of creative processes. 4 Proposing that the creative process contains four
components: preparation, incubation, illumination and verification, this foresaw computer architecture
later. John Curtis Gowan describes the flow of the process in his examination of creative insight.
1 Higher Creativity Liberating the Unconscious for Breakthrough Insights. Willis Harman, Ph.D and
Howard Rheingold. Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc. Los Angelas CA, U.S.A. ISBN 0-87477-293-1, ISBN 0-87477-
335-0. Ínstitute of Noetic Sciences. pg. 20.
2 Ibid. pg. 19
3 Higher Creativity pg. 21
4 Higher Creativity pg. 21
5 Higher Creativity pg. 21
Attribute Content, Text to Gary_Gabriel 20081PubMenTrain_CreProbSolvV1 31.12.08 -1-
These four components combined in a process that explained the moments of insight described by
creative artists and geniuses. It explains why a period of intensive activity precedes an insight that
does not appear to be connected but hangs disconnected in space. Case studies show that some of the
participants that regularly had creative breakthroughs took the pains to examine the reason for their
creative successes. They were convinced that this process could be developed and improved by
conscious effort. These efforts assisted in defining the creative process leading to their breakthroughs.
Incubation Process
Lightning bolts and the resulting illumination develops from two massive potentials that build up in the
earth’s atmosphere. They result from unequal distributions of energy. Only through the difference in
energy can lightning discharge. Incubation is the name given to the process and results from the
intensive effort necessary to define the problem and examine possible solutions and their
consequences. Through this storage effort a massive disparity between the possible solutions and the
void (vacuum) created by the lack of the needed solution entails.
The subconscious processor most effectively links the unconscious logic with the rationally prepared
data. However for a multitude of reasons we try to prevent that and the processing normally ends up in
the conscious idea processor. The linking takes time and requires an incubation period for the
“Processing” Mode. After the data and instructions have been fed into it, the unconscious mode is used
to process the information. Processing is done by re connecting the data or problem details with the
logical connections dictated by the irrational.
Without the necessary data from the rational structure, the subconscious processes functions like a
person putting a puzzle together without all the pieces. It will work to produce a good piece of work to
please, but the results don’t fit. The preparations for subconscious processing are detail work.
Clearly, a detailed description improves the precision that the problem is stated. It provides more
details and the necessary extrapolation between the details or data points is decreased. The resulting
solution will be more suitable for the problem and of greater originality in regards to the stated
problem. Completely, missing details create holes where the processor will extrapolate from
experience. This experience may or may not apply to the stated problem. Where the available
experience lacks a logical connection, the solution will be weak. Completeness of the problem
statement increases suitability of the solution.
Intention is a statement of the will to solve the problem. It includes the clearness and completeness of
the statement. Subconsciously the intensity of the work done is influenced by the completeness. If it is
complete, then the subconscious understands that it is intended to tread the path to a solution, it is not
play. Intension is also an expression of the force applied. The greater the force, the more serious the
irrational will apply itself to the problem and make more creative irrational connections. It will apply
itself to develop or process a solution breaking through typical rational logic or connections. Assigning
a higher priority to the problem gives it processing priority before other problems lined up to be solved.
All problems in the subconscious compete for processing time.
The subconscious processor synthesizes images, language and the technical language of math as well
as the sciences. In an analogy, the rational processor uses a three dimensional expression provided by
the senses of seeing, hearing and smelling. Feeling is given a low grade of confidence. Subconscious
Because feelings provide a further dimension of input, “By intensively examining a problem,
visualizing, and creating scenarios of possible solutions, learning even the most tangential facts about
it, and deeply intending and desiring to solve it, the overall knowledge available to the memory,
unconscious as well as conscious brought into play.” 7
Agreeing with the results of Synectics [1], living and feeling the problem as well as the solution and its
quality is an important part of the process. Inputting the problem for processing consists of the
preparation of the available data; prepared for the rational as well as the irrational. Care should be
taken not to omit details. Characters in the mind act in a play that concerns itself with feeling the
problem, the solution and the quality of the solution. That is how the individual feels when the
(unknown) solution crystallizes.
Verification
Not all that the subconscious produces survives the rigors of conscious “life”. Much is like the fragile
fantasy or fairy tale similar to the “Lord of the Rings”. How does one sift through all the fantasy bubbles
to determine what is actual creativity or innovation and will really fulfill the defined requirements? “The
verification mode is the stage when phantasms are distinguished from inspirations, and legions of
delusions are sifted to reveal the insights buried between them.” 8 Hard work is again called for to
verify and determine the usefulness and suitability of the irrational logic now clothed in realistic terms.
After the determination of a suitable solution, the generality of the solution is tested. Lightning bolts
only hit one spot. If the solution is like a lightning bolt in that it is only suitable for individual use; either
it can be further generalized, or incubation used to produce a more general solution.
Reliance on a subconscious processing establishes a channel to this processing. Time changes from a
linear progression of connecting rational details to an incubation that is controlled by the irrational. Like
a pregnancy, experience helps in estimating when the connections will be completed, but it is a period
of waiting ended by a flash of inspiration painted in the brilliant colors of deep space against an
impenetrable black background. Through the use of the symmetry of rational and irrational, the
chances substantially increase of a creative or innovative solution. The defined process makes it
possible to improve the productiveness and efficiency of making innovative connections.
Why is it a problem?
Occurring as the result of a deviation, the effect occurs when expectations or logical conclusions do not
occur. Observation or experience results in a contrary state. Normally this state is detrimental and
deviates from the required or expected state. This deviation is the motivating factor to resolve the
problem. It is recognized that the state must be changed and a means to change the state is desired.
The preparation results in a precise definition of the problem, setting the boundaries around what the
problem “is”, and “is not”. In addition, the changes and growth due to the problem are made visible. A
process to define the problem is according to Kepner and Tregore in the book The Rational Manager;
Attribute Content, Text to Gary_Gabriel 20081PubMenTrain_CreProbSolvV1 31.12.08 -4-
“is the most valuable single tool a manger can have for solving any kind of problem. It defines
what is relevant, it exposes the clues to the cause, and provides a testing standard for every
possible cause.”9
These authors defined a process to define the problem that is simple and systematic becoming even
mechanical. But mechanizing a process requires a discipline in application, and in doing the research to
collect the information to describe the problem. Success depends at this stage not on the innovative
quality of finding the cause, but in the preciseness and completeness of the problem definition. As
often is the case, the needed discipline is tedious but a necessary part of the preparation.
To assist in collection and description, a form is helpful to initiate a visualization of the problem and
where it deviates from the expected state or recognized need. Visualization of the changes makes
them more evident.
Specification of what the problem is according to the authors of The Rational Manager. 10
Investigation normally proceeds step-by-step and the resulting stepped information is recorded. This
information differs from what the problem is not and what it does not affect. What the problem is
depends on the following factors.
1. What is the deviation, and what is the thing or object that is observed deviating?
2. Where is the deviation on the thing or object, and where are objects with the deviation
observed?
3. When does the deviation appear on the thing or object, and when are objects with the deviation
observed?
4. How big or what is the extent of the deviations, and how many objects with deviations are
observed?
Similarly the symmetry or relationship of what the problem “is not” follow from the investigation, one
might say fall out. But it is important to record them to precisely define the problem boundaries.
Affected objects separate from things that are not affected. The separation illuminates the effect of the
problem and where the deviation does not occur. The problem specification encloses the deviation and
quantizes it. Distinctions about the problem and what makes them distinctive are noted to emphasize
the separation between what “is” being affected and what “is not”. In a problem, the cause relates to a
change from an expected state. The solution effects a change in the deviation to the expected.
What is characteristic about this change? How does it deviate from the expected? How did the
change develop?
9 The Rational Manager. Charles H. Kepner. Benjamin B. Tregoe. McGraw-Hill Book Company. 1965.
Library of Congress Card Number 65-21586. Pg. 75.
Where?
On object observed
When?
On object observed
How?
Extent?
How much
How many
Why?
Who?
Note: the questions What (Quid)?, How? (Quomodo), When (Quando)?, Why (Cur)? How much? Where
(Ubi)? Who (Quis)? Originate from De Inventione from Cicero.
Rationally establishing the cause requires the search for the change that results in exactly the same
effects observed in the distinctions.
The search for the cause of a problem narrows down to the search for that change which could
produce the precise effects observed through some area of distinction.11
Assumption: there is only one change, simple or complex, that can produce the exact effect observed.
The Rational Manager, pg. 89.
Analysis to find distinctions is tedious and arduous work, involving detail analysis. Perhaps because the
mind is accustomed to finding similarities and comparing similar states. Searching for distinctions
involves analyzing differences and how they differ from the expected state. It is an obstacle to adjust
the mind to change to find or see the differences.
When looking for distinctions we must do just the reverse, searching out what separates
things, what makes them unlike? Pg. 89.
The question is asked: what makes the “is” state different from the “is not” state?
1. Observation involves seeing a complete state or symmetry of two poles. The values of these
poles melt into one another, making a distinction difficult. It takes work to start defining the
values, and after the quantization, the boundaries between the poles become (more) obvious. A
boundary occurs between what participates in creating the problem and what has no effect, but
11 The Rational Manager. Pg. 89.
Attribute Content, Text to Gary_Gabriel 20081PubMenTrain_CreProbSolvV1 31.12.08 -6-
is observed as a result of the problem. First one has to be able to recognize that day and night
are different, and how they are different.
2. After the boundary is set, the cause is isolated from the effect and confirmed through what is
distinctive.
3. Another conscious exercise is needed to resolve between the observed state, what the problem
“is” and “is not”, and visualize how it could be. That is how can the symmetry of “is”, and “is
not” change to solve the problem and what this state would look like.
4. Then the next visualization step is to visualize how the cause could be changed to effect the
solution state. This can be compared to seeing a shadow and being able to visualize the object
throwing the shadow.
5. Steps 1.- 4. summarize the work of the subconscious in the “Incubation” Mode. Isolation of the
problem and linkage with a solution occurs subconsciously and presents in a blinding flash of
intuition.
The concept of distinctions underlies the whole procedure of problem analysis. The manager
has to find the one simple or complex change responsible for the problem, and the clues to
this change lie in one place: in the characteristics that distinguish what the problem “is” from
what the problem “is not”. 12
The clues to the change involve the distinctions between „is“ and “is not”. Factors in the “is” cause the
problem, while the “is not” do not participate in creating the problem. While not being causal, they
cannot be ignored because they relate to the “is” factors and provide information as to what could
cause the problem. If the factors are confused, or not distinguished, then the cause will be false. A
deviation from the expected is exposed when the “is” factors are distinct from the “is not” factors.
Then the deviation is unique and relates to the change causing the problem. Change is defined as
something new or different. When changes occur, the balance of forces disrupts and interrupts the
flow. Production no longer achieves the defined level.
What is distinctive is observed and will change when the cause is isolated, and changed. Only by
changing the “is“ factors will the problem be solved. Arrangement of the information into “is” and “is
not” equates to the polarity or distinctions between cause and effect. Rationally establishing the cause
requires the search for the change that results in exactly the same effects observed in the distinctions.
Statement of Cause.
This analysis produces the one critical change that causes the problem. In the analysis that can contain
multiple possible causes, the causes should be formulated in a form of testable, positive statements of
cause and effect.
Since this times the memoirs of leading scientists, artists and even businessmen have confirmed using
the method and commented on the success. Further explored and researched in the 50’s, this work
detailed the process and verified it. Significant organizations used the Incubation Method and further
developed the method including:
- Synetics [1]
- Ínstitute of Noetic Sciences. [2]
1) It is currently one of the leading theories of creativity research. It does not let itself be rationally
documented, explained or argumented. The logical chain is not available for critical analysis and
questioning. It relies on “hidden” intuitive methods and the reliability of it depends on verification.
Business, technology, education and politics do not have confidence in “ir”-rational methods.
2) The Scientific Method depends on the deterministic causality of Descartes. A hypothesis states the
theory and a proof presents the causal steps leading to the observed state. The Rational Manager
replicates this process by defining the single problem precisely. The solution shows how to solve the
problem. Incubation removes the solution from observation. It offers no causal proof, but requires belief
until verification. It relies on feeling.
3) The method does not produce the information for Risk Analysis. It states the solution but offers not
alternatives. It bases on an identification of the actual problem and a reliable solution for this problem.
Risk Analysis assumes compensating systems that clutch if the results change from the expected.
5) It is difficult to use in team and to use to manage or guide team activities. It’s difficult to co-ordinate
team activities based on insights that bubble up out of the clear water of a deep, dark, quiet cistern. It
takes a project management with established self-confidence to pose the open questions and let the
solution develop as the details work out.
6) Financing bases it’s controlling on measurable targets. The blinding flashes of Incubation Insights do
not ramp up and are an all or nothing deal.
Bibliography
[1] Synectics The Development of Creative Capacity. William J. J. Gordon. Collier Books, New York.
Collier-Macmillan Ltd., London. First Collier Books Edition 1968. Library of Congress Catalog Card
Number: 61-10237. Hardcover Harper and Row Publishers, Inc.
[2] Higher Creativity Liberating the Unconscious for Breakthrough Insights. Willis Harman, Ph.D and
Howard Rheingold. Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc. Los Angelas CA, U.S.A. ISBN 0-87477-293-1, ISBN 0-87477-
335-0. Ínstitute of Noetic Sciences.
[3] The Rational Manager. Charles H. Kepner. Benjamin B. Tregoe. McGraw-Hill Book Company. 1965.
Library of Congress Card Number 65-21586.