Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
4:45 6:15 pm
2:30 4:00 pm
4:30 6:00 pm
4:45 6.15 pm
2:30 4:00 pm
Addressing Externalities
The nexus approach can boost this potential by addressing externalities across sectors. For example, nexus thinking would address the energy intensity of desalination, or water demands in renewable energy production (e.g. biofuels and some hydropower schemes) or water demands of afforestation for carbon storage. Also, action to avoid or land degradation saves water and energy, for example by increasing soil water storage and groundwater recharge, as well as reducing the use of energy intensive fertilizers.
Policy Recommendations
1. Increase resource productivity as one of the goals of the Framework for Action 2. Cross-sectoral management of waste and by-products 3. Enabling conditions for horizontal and vertical policy coherence that includes capacity building and stakeholders participation 4. Define the water-basin as the unit for land-energy-water governance
History
Governments at the Johannesburg Summit in 2002 called for the development of a 10 Year Framework of Programmes (10YFP) in support of regional and national initiatives to accelerate the shift towards sustainable consumption and production (SCP) patterns that will promote social and economic development within the carrying capacity of ecosystems (UN DESA). As a result, the 10YFP on SCP was negotiated at the 18th and 19th sessions of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) from 2010-2011. Although consensus was reached on the section of the negotiating text dedicated to the 10YFP on SCP, the text as a whole was not adopted at the conclusion of CSD-19.
Rio+20
For Rio+20 to be a success, it must build upon past pledges by Member States with bold, action-oriented commitments that address gaps in implementation. So far, in the Rio+20 process, peace and armed conflict have, unfortunately, been largely neglected as issues for sustainable development. Their presence in the current negotiating text is highly limited and lacking in specificity. Indeed, robust commitments on peace and armed conflict are nowhere to be found. While some important progress has been made since the Rio+20 Zero Draft, which contained no references to peace or armed conflict, much more is urgently needed. States must build upon Rio Principles 24 and 25 with commitments to bold action.
Progress so far
Major Groups recognize that there has been progress in terms of the inclusion of language referring to human rights in the text, such as the right to water and basic sanitation. However, there are still no real commitments to establish enabling conditions for the protection, respect and fulfillment of human rights in the context of the current economic and ecological crisis. Countries are still shifting the burden to the private sector at the same time removing language that would subject the private sector to stricter public or social regulation. Developed countries are still opposing any commitment to ensure adequate public financing for sustainable development, especially for developing countries, in line with the Right to Development. There are still no commitments to undertake systemic macro-economic reforms in trade, finance, investments policy which currently prevent countries, particularly developing countries, from generating decent jobs, providing basic health and education, and developing green productive capacity. Also, there are still no clear commitments to rights-based accountability mechanisms.
Recommendations
The MGCY calls upon Member States to protect the existing human rights agreements in the green economy framework or new institutional structures. While equitable and universal access to natural resources and meeting of basic needs are fundamental, the RIo+20 outcome must reaffirm the Human Rights based approach -- as protection of rights brings equity. Equitable sustainable development and poverty eradication are only possible when rights are upheld to set the path for future generations towards sustainable and essentially peaceful livelihoods. However, before the door can open for sincerely sustainable solutions, the UN must effectively fulfill its obligation to protect all rights.