Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • United States District Court Southern District of New York

    Încărcat de

    Equality Case Files
    52 vizualizări28 pagini
    The United States filed a notice of appeal regarding a judgment in the case of Edith Schlain Windsor v. The United States of America. The district court had granted Windsor's motion for summary judgment, denied a motion to dismiss, declared that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional as applied to Windsor, and awarded her damages. The United States is now appealing the district court's decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Descriere originală:

    Doc #97 - DOJ's corrected notice of appeal

    Titlu original

    1:10-cv-08435 #97

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The United States filed a notice of appeal regarding a judgment in the case of Edith Schlain Windsor v. The United States of America. The district court had granted Windsor's motion for summary judgment, denied a motion to dismiss, declared that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional as applied to Windsor, and awarded her damages. The United States is now appealing the district court's decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    52 vizualizări28 pagini

    United States District Court Southern District of New York

    Încărcat de

    Equality Case Files
    The United States filed a notice of appeal regarding a judgment in the case of Edith Schlain Windsor v. The United States of America. The district court had granted Windsor's motion for summary judgment, denied a motion to dismiss, declared that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional as applied to Windsor, and awarded her damages. The United States is now appealing the district court's decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 28

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97

    Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

    EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

    Civil Action No. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) ECF CASE

    NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Defendant the United States of America hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the Judgment dated June 7, 2012 [ECF No. 94] and the underlying Order dated June 6, 2012 [ECF No. 93]. Dated this 14th day of June, 2012.

    Dated: June 14, 2012

    Respectfully submitted, STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General ARTHUR R. GOLDBERG Assistant Branch Director /s/ Jean Lin JEAN LIN (NY Bar No. 4074530) Senior Trial Counsel United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20530

    USDC SDNY

    DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED


    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    ------------------------------------------------------------)(
    EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, Plaintiff, -againstTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

    DOC#: _ _ _ _--:---

    DATE FILED:
    10 CIVIL 8435 (BSJ) JUDGMENT

    b{?/11--

    /1~ or;., 1'3

    -----------------------------------------------------------)(

    Plaintiff having moved for summary judgment; Defendant-Intervenor having moved to dismiss, and the matter having come before the Honorable Barbara S. Jones, United States District Judge, and the Court, on June 6, 2012, having rendered its Order granting Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, denying Defendant-Intervenor's motion to dismiss, declaring that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. 7, is unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiff, awarding Plaintiff judgment in the amount of$363,053.00, plus interest and costs allowed by law with each party to bear their own costs and fees, it is,

    ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the
    Court's Order dated June 6, 2012, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted and Defendant-Intervenor's motion to dismiss is denied; the Court declares that section 3 ofthe Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. 7, is unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiff; Plaintiff is awarded judgment in the amount of$363,053.00, plus interest and costs allowed by law; each party shall bear their own costs and fees; accordingly, the case is closed.

    Dated: New York, New York June 7, 2012

    RUBY J. KRAJICK
    Clerk of Court

    BY:
    Deputy Clerk
    THIS DC'CUME1'j 1 WAS ENTERED ON THE DOCKET O N - - - -

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 2 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 2 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 3 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 3 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 4 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 4 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 5 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 5 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 6 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 6 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 7 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 7 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 8 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 8 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 9 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 9 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 10 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 10 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 11 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 11 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 12 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 12 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 13 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 13 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 14 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 14 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 15 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 15 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 16 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 16 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 17 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 17 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 18 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 18 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 19 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 19 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 20 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 20 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 21 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 21 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 22 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 22 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 23 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 23 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 24 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 24 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 25 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 25 of 26

    Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ-JCF Document 97-2 Filed 06/06/12 Page 26 of 26 Case 1:10-cv-08435-BSJ -JCF Document 93 Filed 06/14/12 Page 26 of 26

    S-ar putea să vă placă și