Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TITLE Study of vehicle-in to out cycle time for dispatch of steel product (Presently wire rod & Rebar product) at JSPL, Patratu.
PROBLEM It is observed that vehicle-in to out cycle time is very high. This is due to various non value activity (NVA) including in this cycle time.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to suggest the right way for reducing the cycle time. So that we can handle more and more material and dispatch with greater efficiency. If we are able to do same then we can save resources and timely deliver the product to customer. SCOPE For dispatch of steel product, IE study is undertaken to understand the existing process from Dispatch order (DO), truck or trailer placement at loading point, their loading, invoice making and finally dispatch to different party by truck or trailer.
J S P L - Patratu
History of dispatch: a) Wire-rod dispatch:MONTH JAN'12 Feb'12 MAR'12 APR'12 MAY'12 WRM RAKE 22492 6429 25448 22242 23480
J S P L - Patratu
Tonnage
J S P L - Patratu
DO MAKING
VEHICLE GATE IN
LOADING AT YARD
VEHICLE GATE-OUT
PGI MAKING
There are various activity involved in vehicle-in to out cycle time which is shown in above diagram. Basically, process start from DO making activity after that Gate-in, Vehicle tare weight, Loading of vehicle at yard, Vehicle gross weight, PGI making, Invoicing, and finally process end at Vehicle gate-out. The process is dealing here one by one. 1. DO Making: This is the first activity of gate-in to gate-out process. In this activity driver go to marketing office and finally marketing executive generate a hard copy. In this hard copy all details related to dispatch are mentioned. Maximum time takes in this activity is 4 min 52 seconds with minimum 1 min 10 second and average time 2 min 42 seconds.
J S P L - Patratu
DO NO. 71204147 71204146 71204148 71204149 71204150 71204151 71204152 71204154 71204155 71204156 71204157 71204158 71204159 71204160 71204161 Max Time Min Time Average Time
SUBMISSION TIME 9:50:00 9:00:45 9:50:00 9:50:00 9:50:00 9:50:00 9:50:00 11:28:00 11:12:01 11:12:01 11:12:01 11:45:54 11:45:54 12:10:23 12:10:23
SERVICE START TIME 9:50:09 9:35:13 10:19:49 10:17:58 10:59:45 11:05:59 11:08:23 11:33:32 11:53:22 11:51:49 11:58:32 12:14:00 12:12:03 12:23:11 12:36:45
SERVICE END TIME 9:51:19 9:36:43 10:21:56 10:21:56 11:02:32 11:07:59 11:10:34 11:36:50 11:56:41 11:56:41 12:02:18 12:16:12 12:16:12 12:24:56 12:38:12
Total Service Time 0:01:10 0:01:30 0:02:07 0:03:58 0:02:47 0:02:00 0:02:11 0:03:18 0:03:19 0:04:52 0:03:46 0:02:12 0:04:09 0:01:45 0:01:27 0:04:52 0:01:10 0:02:42
TOTAL TIME 0:01:19 0:35:58 0:31:56 0:31:56 1:12:32 1:17:59 1:20:34 0:08:50 0:44:40 0:44:40 0:50:17 0:30:18 0:30:18 0:14:33 0:27:49 1:20:34 0:01:19 0:38:55
2. Vehicle gate-in: This is the second activity in this activity driver takes vehicle inside the plant (presently from Gate-A) and go for tare weight. 3. Vehicle Tare weight: This is the third activity in this activity drivers come their vehicle for tare weight. Our weighbridge is situated at Gate-B.
J S P L - Patratu
4. Loading at yard: After tare weight, vehicle comes for loading at yard. If product is wire rod then vehicle go to WRM dispatch area and if product is TMT Bar then vehicle move to bar mill dispatch area. In WRM dispatch area loading is done with the help of Hydra and crane.
J S P L - Patratu
Field observations are conducted to establish the cycle time of coil shifting from Storage area to trailer using crane and is shown below:
Sl. No. 1 Vehicle No. Starting Date & Time 5/28/10 9:30 End Date & Time 8/30/10 10:16 Lot No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 JH05Z3162 5/28/2010 11:51 8/30/2010 12:26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 NL01G8315 5/28/2010 12:29 8/30/2010 13:02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No. of coil 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cycle Time 00:05:58 00:04:25 00:04:30 00:04:18 00:05:14 00:03:46 00:06:05 00:05:13 00:04:22 00:06:09 00:04:41 00:03:40 00:04:26 00:03:52 00:05:10 00:03:50 00:03:45 00:02:16 00:04:28 00:04:16 00:03:39 00:02:38 00:03:55 00:04:13 00:05:15 00:05:19 with the help of magnet 00:33:00 Crane-2 with the help of magnet 00:35:00 with the help of magnet Crane-2 Trailer Loading Time 00:46:00 Delay Remarks
NL01A5720
Crane-1
J S P L - Patratu
Sl. No. 4 Vehicle No. Starting Date & Time 5/28/2010 3:47
JH05AJ6838
Loaded by crane no 1
JH05Z3162
5/29/2010 9:53
8/31/2010 11:00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
NL - 02G 3157
5/29/2010 10:17
8/31/2010 10:53
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
J S P L - Patratu
Sl. No. 7 Vehicle No. Starting Date & Time 5/29/2010 10:58
CG10M1171
Loaded by crane no -2
RJ19GA8894
5/29/2010 12:01
8/31/2010 12:53
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NL-01A5720
29-05-2012 10:27:07
29-05-2012 15:16:36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
J S P L - Patratu
Sl. No. 10 Vehicle No. Starting Date & Time 30-05-2012 09:57:04
NL-01D6951
00:30:22
11
NL-01D-6535
30-05-2012 10:30:48
30-05-2012 11:33:25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
10
J S P L - Patratu
Sl. No. 12 Vehicle No. Starting Date & Time 01-06-2012 10:02:21
JH09H7252
00:06:01
13
JH05AH483
01-06-2012 10:02:21
01-06-2012 10:53:20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
11
J S P L - Patratu
STUDY OF VEHICLE-IN TO OUT CYCLE TIME Trailor Loading Time of Wire - rod product
Trailor No.
12
J S P L - Patratu
29-052012
29-052012
TN-522887
0:37:39
0:15:24
31-052012
JH17D2389
1:21:51
1:01:39
31-052012
UP-67T2389
1:08:51
0:19:49
shortage of coil at loading point improper setup of coil on truck shortage of coil at loading point
13
J S P L - Patratu
STUDY OF VEHICLE-IN TO OUT CYCLE TIME Loading Time of Wire rod by hydra
SL NO. 5
DATE
CYCLE NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NO. OF COIL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cycle Time 0:03:06 0:02:19 0:02:33 0:02:27 0:01:25 0:06:10 0:02:27 0:04:43 0:22:17 0:01:25 0:03:48
31-052012
Remarks
14
J S P L - Patratu
6. PGI Making: PGI stands for post good issue. 7. Invoice, Challan making and weigh bill: After completion of PGI, drivers go for invoice. After issuing invoice drivers submit challan and weigh bill to the marketing executive. The details of their time are as following: Invoice, Challan and weigh bill Time
Invoice time 0:10:22 0:10:51 0:13:38 0:01:54 0:12:29 0:13:11 0:13:11 0:10:05 0:10:05 0:02:03 0:06:13 0:06:13 0:06:13 0:13:38 0:01:54 0:08:58 Invoice to challan submission time 4:22:26 4:21:53 4:19:13 0:17:49 0:08:32 0:07:31 0:07:31 0:35:53 0:25:53 4:02:48 3:55:17 3:55:17 3:55:17 4:22:26 0:07:31 2:21:11
Challan submission to gate-out time
DO NUMBER 71204100 71204105 71204089 71204136 71204138 71204141 71204142 71204123 71204087 71204029 71204029 71204031 71204028 Max Min Average
DATE 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 06-06-2012 03-06-2012 03-06-2012 03-06-2012 03-06-2012
Total time 4:59:34 4:58:49 4:58:35 0:34:31 0:37:27 0:36:32 0:36:55 1:11:58 1:11:58 4:43:31 4:44:44 4:46:42 4:47:09 4:59:34 0:34:31 2:59:07
0:05:34 0:05:05 0:04:59 0:03:57 0:03:27 0:02:52 0:02:52 0:04:27 0:04:27 0:02:41 0:03:54 0:05:52 0:06:19 0:06:19 0:02:41 0:04:20
15
J S P L - Patratu
Invocing Time
0:14:24 0:12:58 0:11:31 0:10:05 0:08:38 0:07:12 0:05:46 0:04:19 0:02:53 0:01:26 0:00:00
Time
8. Vehicle gate-out After completion of invoice, submission of challan and weigh bill, security checks the vehicle and finally vehicle go to their destination.
16
J S P L - Patratu
SAP DATA COLLECTION OF VEHICLE-IN TO VEHICLE-OUT CYCLE TIME & ITS ANALYSIS
The sap data of both product rebar and wire rod of the time period of 3 months( Ist march 2012 to 25th may 2012) has been analysed to produce frequency distributions of total gate-in to gate-out time taken as well as time taken in various steps involved in this complete process.
1.SAP DATA FOR VEHICLE-IN VEHICLE OUT TIME OF REBAR MATERIAL VIA TRUCK 1.1GATE-IN TO GATE-OUT
40 no. of trucks 30 20 10 0
time taken
the gate-in gate-out time of most of the trucks lies b/w 20 hours to 30 hours .the average of the total time is 21 hours which also lies in the same range. from the above data ,we get that nearly 60% of trucks take more than average time.From this we can analyze that our average time (mean =X) is telling truth about the delay in cycle time.
17
J S P L - Patratu
gatein to tare wt
From the data we get that most of the trucks have their gate-in to tare wt time in b/w 0 to 1 hour.The average for the data is 43 minutes which suggests the same. Less than 20% of the trucks take their time more than average time. Nearly 16 % of the trucks take their time more than 1 hour which is very satisfactory result which shows that gate-in to tare weight time of most of the trucks are usually ok. 1.3 TARE WEIGHT TO GROSS WEIGHT the above diagram we deduce that 40% of the data are more than average time taken .Nearly 80% of the vehicles take their time more than two times the minimum time which is very unsatisfactory.
tarewt to gross wt
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 no. of trucks cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
18
J S P L - Patratu
From the above diagram we deduce that 40% of the data are more than average time taken .Nearly 80% of the vehicles take their time more than two times the minimum time which is very unsatisfactory result. 1.3 GROSS WEIGHT TO INVOICE TIME
no.of truck 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
gross wt to invoice
From the above table and diagram we can analyze that frequency of vehicle taking less than 2 hours is 50% which shows that only 50% vehicles take more than 6 times of the minimum time taken.This is a very unsatisfactory result.Even the average of the times taken is 2 hours 43 minutes which is much more than the standard time taken. It intensifies the need of modifications to reduce the time taken here.
19
J S P L - Patratu
From the above table and diagram we can analyze that frequency of vehicle taking less than 2 hours (2 hours is 8 times minimum time) is only 25% and 75% within 8 hours .This result indicates that existing situation at marketing department is very worse. There should be proper planning for fast clearance of vehicle waiting for invoice clearance.
20
J S P L - Patratu
From the above chart, we deduce that just 10% of the vehicles take less than 5 hours while just 30% of the vehicle take less than 10 hours of vehicle-in to vehicleout cycle time.This shows that most of the vehicle take more than the standard time of 6 to 8 hours which forces upon the need of modification in the process system and coordination to optimize cycle time.
21
J S P L - Patratu
gate in to tare wt
no. of truck 500 400 300 200 100 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
The above frequency distribution table indicates that 0% vehicle completed the stage in 30 minute, 85% vehicle completed the stage within 1, and negligible no. of vehicles which took more than 2 hours are in actual figures had taken more than 3 hours, which mean they can be taken as abnormal data. 2.3 TARE WEIGHT TO GROSS WEIGHT TIME
tare wt to gross wt
no. of truck 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
Most of the trucks take their time between 2 to 4 hours which is ok by the standard time. Some of the abnormal data take more than the standard time due to the delay caused during loading.
22
J S P L - Patratu
From the chart above,most of the vehicles take their time from gross weight to invoice from o hour to 4 hours.Since the average of the time taken about 3 hours and 21 min and 50% of the vehicle take more than the average time which justifies the result.
23
J S P L - Patratu
Here in the chart,time taken by truck from invoice to gate-out is diversified but still most of the trucks are located between 4 hours to 6 hours. Here 60% of the vehicle take at most 6 hours of the time. While 85% of the vehicle takes more than the standard time of 2 hours which is a very worse situation.
3.SAP DATA COLLECTION AND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF VEHICLE IN TO VEHICLE OUT OF TMT REBAR BY TRUCK 3.1 GATE IN TO GATE OUT CYCLE TIME
Analysing the chart, we get the following results. 1.The average of total cycle time is 22 hours which is very higher than the minimum time taken(3 hours). 2.35% of the vehicle take more than even the average time which shows that there is a very urgent need of modification to minimize the cycle time to the extent possible.
24
J S P L - Patratu
gate in to tare wt
no of trailer 2000 1500 1000 500 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
From the chart above,we get that most of the vehicle take their time to the most 2 hours. Just 5% of the vehicle take their time more than 2 hours which is a very satisfactory result.
tare wt to gross wt
no. of trailer 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
25
J S P L - Patratu
Tare weight to gross weight time of the trailers is diffused from 2 hours to 24 hours which shows that this time is the main cause of delay in the total cycle time.
gross wt to invoice
no. of trailer 1000 800 600 400 200 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
Similar to the case of rebar products by tuck,this graph emphasizes upon concentration of the time taken to nil to 2 hours.Though just 20% of the vehicle take more than 4 hours for gross weight to invoice.
26
J S P L - Patratu
From the graph,70% of the trailers take more than 2 hours for invoicing to gate-out which shows that this area is also in urgent need of attention.
4.SAP DATA COLLECTION AND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF CYCLE TIME OF WIRE ROD BY TRAILER
27
J S P L - Patratu
Study of this graph shows that the frequency of gate-in to gate-out time is most in the interval 5 to 10 hours.Just 20% of the vehicle take more than 10 hours cycle time which is relatively a satisfactory result compared to other products.
gatein to tare wt
no. of trailer 2000 1500 1000 500 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
This process of gate-in to tare weight normally has most of its values lying between 12 minutes to 1 hours. There are just some abnormal data in the table which is among the 10 % of the vahicles taking their time more than 1 hour.
Industrial Engineering HRD, JSPL - Patratu 28
J S P L - Patratu
tare wt to gross wt
no. of trailer 1000 800 600 400 200 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
Tare weight to gross weight time is the most deciding factor in the total delay in the cycle time and we have deduced it through previous three observations. Similarly,in this distribution also,we get the same result as the time taken is mostly diffused from 1 hour to 8 hours.
gross wt to invoice
no. of trailer 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 cumulative 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00%
29
J S P L - Patratu
The study of the graph suggests that excluding some abnormal data, most the vehicle have their gross weigt to invoice time in between 2 hours to 4 hours which is,though not very satisfactory, is manageable.
Execpt some abnormal data(between 10 hours to 14 hours),most of the vehicles usually take upto 4 hours of invoice to gate-out time.Though this is much more than the satandard time of 1 hour,proper planning at the marketing department is needed to get this process done in lesser time.
30
J S P L - Patratu
Improper set up of coil on traKata weight & tag weight varies (In Case of TMT bar)iler SAP server down
Wrong card is attached to the coil Congetion of vehicle at loading point Hydra not available
Non segmentizatio
Driver is not reaching for PGI, Invoice in time No proper cordination among department To be dispatched material is not tagged in SAP,thus causing delay in DO making. workers & Drivers do not know about impact of delay
Miscelleneous reason
31
J S P L - Patratu
Problems at loading point Sl. No. Problem I) Shortage of coil at loading point. Wrong grade of coil put on the trailer Improper set up of coil on trailer Trailer is available but loading gang is not Present. Wrong card is attached to the coil Congetion of vehicle at loading point
Suggestion Vehicle send to the loading point, make sure that material is present at the loading point. Make sure that this is the right coil then load on the vehicle. Set the coil on the trailer in the right way so that there is no repition of work. Loading gang should present at the right place. Due to wrong card kata wt. and tag wt. differ. So operator should attach the card carefully. There should be some time interval between two vehicle. It is observed that sometimes no any vehicle is present at loading point and sometimes it became congetion. This is also resulted from congetion of vehicle at loading point. It is necessary that management should stack the coil at loading point by grade wise. This is due to machine problem. Immediate correct the machine.
II) III)
Logistics Logistics
IV) V)
Logistics Mill
VI)
Logistics
VII) VIII)
Hydra not available Non segmentization of dispatch goods Kata weight & tag weight varies (In Case of TMT bar)
Logistics Logistics
IX)
Mill
32
J S P L - Patratu
Sl. Problem No. Vehicle Tare weight X) Server slow XI) Infrastructure is not good
Suggestion
SAP department should observe and short out the problem. Basically condtion of rod and related area is not proper so management should make it proper This is due to machine problem. Immediate correct the machine. It is observed that driver not reach for PGI & Invoice in time. Management should fill a log book so that make system proper. It is observed that there is no proper planing among department. Loading gang do not know about what should be the next material for loading. Management should make board and display on it that 1 hr. Delay cost is Rs.....
Vehicle gross weight XII) Kata weight & tag weight varies (In Case of TMT bar) Misseleneous Problem XIII) Driver is not reaching for PGI, Invoice in time
Mill
XIV)
XV)
Logistics
XVI)
Lack of communication between Communication mediums must be transporter and marketing improved department
marketing department
33