Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
Fatal Accidents per 100 Aircraft - Business Jets and Turboprops (Excludes Acts of Violence)
0.40 0.35 Fatal Accidents per 100 Aircraft 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 1990
Business Jets
1995
Business Turboprops
2000
2005
2010
Linear (Business Jets)
Annual Fatal Accident Rates (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.06 Jets 0.12 0.18 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.19 0.20 Turboprops Fatal accidents per 100 aircraft at risk
Fatal Accidents
Business jets suffered a total of only four fatal accidents last year, one fewer than in 2010 but the same number as in 2009. The past three years have shown a considerable improvement on earlier years when, typically, some seven or eight fatal accidents might have been expected in any given year. The number of fatal accidents in 2011 was about half the annual average for the last decade, 7.6, and also the 1990s average of 8.1. Business turboprops suffered 12 fatal accidents in 2011, five more than in 2010 but the same as in 2009. Again, as with business jets, the past three years have shown an improvement on earlier years, when 15 fatal accidents a year might have been considered typical. The number of fatal accidents in 2011, although showing an increase over 2010, was still down on the annual average for the last decade, 15.4, and also the 1990s average of 16.7.
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
25
20 Fatal Accidents
15
10
0 1990 Business Jets 1995 Business Turboprops 2000 2005 2010 5 per. Mov. Avg. (Business Jets)
The reduced number of fatal accidents suffered by business jets over the past three years and, to a much lesser extent, the number suffered by business turboprops show the first real decrease in accident frequency for a long time over 20 years in the case of business jets and about 15 years for turboprops. In our report last year we expressed concern that the frequency of fatal accidents suffered by business aircraft was not showing any clear sign of decreasing, with the average annual number of these accidents having been more or less the same for a number of years. Safety is, of course, improving, with the fatal accident rate on a per-aircraft basis rapidly falling. However, this improvement in safety had only been keeping up with the growth of the fleet; it had not been enough to reduce the frequency of accidents. It is believed that the general public and many of the users of this class of aircraft are more likely to form their opinion about their safety from the number of times they hear about a crash. Therefore, reducing the frequency of fatal accidents is more important from the point of view of safety perception than just getting the accident rate down.
Annual Fatal Accidents (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 5 11 7 6 8 9 Jets 10 15 16 13 14 17 Turboprops Fatal accidents involving passenger and/or crew deaths 2008 9 18 2009 4 12 2010 5 7 2011 4 12
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
Fatalities
As would be expected, the number of passenger and crew deaths as a result of business aircraft accidents in 2011 more or less followed the number of fatal accidents suffered during the year. Some 16 passengers and crew died in the four fatal accidents suffered by business jets in 2011, giving a simple average of four fatalities per fatal accident. Some 18 passengers and crew died in the five fatal accidents in 2010. 2011s result was very much better than the previous decades average of 23.4 and that for the 1990s, 35.4. Some 48 passengers and crew died in the 12 fatal accidents suffered by business turboprops in 2011, again giving a simple average of four fatalities per fatal accident. 2011s death toll was considerably worse than 2010s, when 24 people died in seven fatal accidents, but showed some improvement over 2009, which saw 56 fatalities from 12 fatal accidents. The annual average for the 2000s was 49.5 and for the 1990s it was 57.6. The passenger and crew fatality rate for 2011 for business jets was better than one per 12,500 seat years, compared with one per 11,100 seats in 2010. 2011 also showed a very considerable improvement on the one per 6,700 seats average for last decade and was about five times as good as the average of one per 2,500 seats in the 1990s.
Passenger/Crew Fatalities - Business Jets and Turboprops (Excludes Acts of Violence)
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Number of Fatalities
1990
2002
Annual Fatalities (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 12 22 27 23 22 Jets 30 42 55 38 40 Turboprops Passenger and crew fatalities
2007 21 44
2008 39 55
2009 11 56
2010 18 24
2011 16 48
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
The worst accidents in 2011 were: 1) The Majuba Aviation Pilatus PC-12 accident in February, which killed seven passengers and two crew when the aircraft crashed into the sea during a go-around in poor visibility from Plettenberg Bay, South Africa; 2) The Sky Lounge Hawker 850XP, also in February, which crashed immediately after take-off from Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, killing four passengers and three crew; and 3) The Air Charter Services Pilatus PC-12 which crashed at Faridabad, India, in May while descending in-bound to Delhi, killing five passengers and two crew.
Fatality Rates
Fatality rates, on a deaths per 1,000 seat-years basis, in 2011 generally followed the pattern shown for fatal accidents, with business jets producing a relatively good result but business turboprops being poor. Business jets showed a small improvement on 2010, going from about one death per 11,100 seats to one per 12,500 seats last year. 2011 was not as good as 2009, when the fatality rate was one per 16,600 seats; however, 2009 had the lowest fatality rate since the class entered service and the past three years have all produced results that were very much better than average. The average fatality rate for the 2000s was one per 6,700 seats and for the 1990s it was one per 2,600 seats. Turboprops continued to disappoint, with a fatality rate in 2011 of one per 2,300 seats, compared with one per 4,500 in 2010. The fatality rate in 2009 was one per 2,000 seats while the average for the last decade was also one per 2,000. The average for the 1990s was one per 1,500 seats. It is perhaps worrying that, although the turboprop business fatality rate over the past 10 years has shown an improvement over the 1990s, there has been little or no improvement in the rate in recent years.
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
Passenger/Crew Fatalities per 1,000 Seats - Business Jets & Turboprops (Excludes Acts of Violence)
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00 1990 Business Jets 1995 Business Turboprops 2000 2005 2010 Linear (Business Jets)
Annual Fatality Rates (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 0.09 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12 Jets 0.32 0.44 0.56 0.38 0.39 0.42 Turboprops Fatalities (passengers and crew) per 1,000 seats
Total Losses
Based on provisional advice, business jets suffered only 11 total losses during 2011, half the number in 2010 but slightly up from the nine suffered in 2009. 2011 also showed a marked improvement over the average for the last decade, 18, and that for the 1990s, 18.3. However, based on past experience it is likely that a number of 2011s substantial damage accidents, which we are currently counting as major partial losses, may turn out to be total losses (constructive total losses), but it is thought unlikely that the result for the year will worsen significantly. Although business jets apparently suffered relatively few total losses in 2011, the longer-term trend shows no improvement in accident frequency It would seem that we can normally expect something between 15 or 20 total losses, on average, every year. Business turboprops suffered 34 total losses in 2011 but this included a significant number of non-operational losses as the result of the tsunami at Sendai, Japan, last March and, to a lesser extent, the Bangkok floods last October. There has been no improvement in the frequency of turboprop total losses over the past 20 years.
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
Total Losses - Business Jets 5 per. Mov. Avg. (Total Losses - Business Jets)
Annual Number of Total Losses (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14 18 19 23 20 24 22 Jets 17 26 28 27 26 27 31 Turboprops Operational and Non-Operational Total Losses (data is provisional)
2009 9 30
2010 22 25
2011 11 34
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
Total Losses per 100 Aircraft - Business Jets and Turboprops (Excludes Acts of Violence)
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
2000
2005
Annual Total Loss Rate (Business Aircraft) Past 10 Years Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.15 0.17 Jets 0.21 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.30 Turboprops Operational and Non-Operational Total Losses per 100 aircraft
NOTES *'Business Jets and Turboprops'. Our definition includes all those aircraft types generally considered to be targeted at the private/corporate executive market but excluding 'airliner types', which may be used as executive/VVIP transports. This analysis is based on the class of aircraft and is not limited to just those aircraft actually in private/corporate use. Many of these 'business' aircraft are operated for passenger or cargo air taxi/charter, aerial work etc. ** Accident Rates. Currently we do not have good data for the number of flights etc on a global basis for this class of aircraft to allow us to calculate accident rates in the form of, for instance, 'fatal accidents per million flights'. However, we do have good fleet data and this allows us to use 'aircraft years' (average number of aircraft in the fleet) and 'seat years' as measures of exposure when calculating accident rates. Nevertheless, although these rates do give a good indication of trends over the longer term, possible changes in utilisation from year to year should be borne in mind when comparing one year with another.
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
The information contained in our databases and used in this report has been assembled from many sources and, while reasonable care has been taken, we are unable to give any warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose and the information is supplied on the understanding that no legal liability whatsoever shall attach to Ascend Worldwide Limited, its officers, or employees in respect of any error or omission that may have occurred. In providing this data, no consideration has been made of the interests and concerns of any third party and Ascend denies any responsibility howsoever arising to any third party in the use of this data.
Accident Alerts
Brief details of accidents as they happen - sent by e-mail
Special Bulletins
When a major accident occurs, Ascend promptly publishes a Special Bulletin summarising all the available information about the event. These are supported by regular statistical reports detailing the accident frequency and loss rate trends for different sectors of the aviation market.
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
10
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
11
The aviation industry relies on Ascend and Flightglobal for the most reliable and up-to-date information and insight available
For almost five decades, our international team of experts has delivered independent and trusted advice to help companies achieve results and drive profitable performance. Our market-leading products and services include:
All over the world, tens of thousands of market opinions are sought using Ascend information. Our rich source of proprietary data sources and analytical capabilities are second to none.
Contact us
Email: insight@flightglobal.com Twitter: Twitter.com/AscendAviation LinkedIn: LinkedIn group Ascend Air Safety & Insurance Web: www.flightglobal.com/insight
Flightglobal.com | ascendworldwide.com
12