Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 to June 30, 2012 For the Month of April Employee: Position: MA. ADELFA C. APAD Administrative Aide I Office: Unit: Provincial Planning and Devt. Office Administrative Division SUPERVISOR'S RATING WEIGHT % WORK ACTIVITY OUTPUT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR OPERATIONAL DEFINITION QN 30% 33.0% QL 40% 42.0% TIME 30% 32.0% TOTAL 107.0% % SHARE 32.1%
30%
Provide Time-Keeping Services and other related functions for the employees of the PPDO, including monitoring of PPDO employees' whereabouts/ movement/ uniform compliance
Maintain 100% copy of DTR sheets ofr April, Crossed checked and filed DTR for 32 employees for April, Submitted reporrts on wearing of uniforms, pass slips, attendance reorts and blood pressure , tardiness for the month of April. 100% of assigned tasks on office cleaning/ EMS implementation performed 100% of assigned tasks performed
Maintain complete record on DTRs, functions performed with less supervision, DTRs checked 1 day after receipt of DTRs from employees. Accurate review of DTR
10%
Maintain office cleanliness, Cleanliness and orderliness sanitation and orderliness, including maintained at the office EMS assistance in the implementation of implementation assisted EMS policies Provide liaison services for official office transactions Provide assistance in the preparation of financial claims/ payments of authorized office obligations Processed and tracked financial claims/ disbursements & payments Prepared vouchers/ OB-R/ supporting documents for processing/payment
20%
Cleaning done pro-actively, EMS policies, esp. on energy conservation, adhered to. No complaints. No supervision required Tracking properly updated regularly, required less supervision. Own initiative Supporting documents completely prepared and processed immediately.Less supervision. No Correction
30.0%
44.0%
32.0%
106.0%
10.6%
30.0%
40.0%
32.0%
102.0%
20.4%
20%
All assigned tasks for claims/ payments prepared with supporting documents (Catering, Frieght, subscription) - BIWRMT, Process of 10 claims and travel orders
30.0%
42.0%
32.0%
104.0%
20.8%
20%
Assist in the encoding, photocopying and other related tasks that may be assigned by supervisor
All tasked assigned were performed Less supervision required, proon encoding of daily unidorms, pass actively performed and done slips, tardiness, duplicating and less than the expected time messengerial functions
30.0%
42.0%
32.0%
104.0%
20.8%
100%
104.7%
vt. Office
RATING REMARKS
PART II. COMPETENCY CLUSTER I. 1 2 3 II. 1 2 3 4 5 III. 1 2 3 4 5 IV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 V. 1 2 3 4 VI. Strategic Orientation Concept Thinking Innovative Thinking Problem Solving Leadership and Supervision Change Leadership Sharing Responsibility Holding People Accountable Team Leadership Planning, Organizing, Controlling Interpersonal Influence Listening Understanding Networking Teamwork Courtesy Human Relations Personal Effectiveness Results Orientation Commitment to Learning Client Service Orientation Concern for Political Impact Flexibility Organizational Awareness Planning and Initiative Stress Tolerance Punctuality and Attendance Applied Academic Competencies Computer Skills Business Writing Finding/ Using Information Speaking/ Presentation Skills Job Specific Technical Competencies
Expected Level
Rating
Remarks
PART III. SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 1 Assisted in the implementation of special projects/ activities of the office (BIWRM, PDC Meetings PDPFP Meetings)
Ratings
Weight
Weighted Average
Overall Average Rating Overall Average Rating x No. of Activities SUMMARY RATINGS PART I: WORK PERFORMANCE PART II: COMPETENCIES PART III: SPECIAL ACTIVITIES FOR SUPERVISOR'S ONLY PART IV. OPES RATING TOTAL PERCENTAGE ADJECTIVAL RATING GUIDE
4% 104.7% 115.0% 70% 30% 73.3% 34.5% 4.0% 111.8% Very Satisfactory ADJECTIVAL RATING OPES PES Exceptional Exceptional (9.01-10.00) (151%-190%) Commendable Outstanding (7.01-9.00) (131%-150%) Efficient Very Satisfactory (5.51-7.00) (110%-130%) Good Solid Satisfactory (100%Performance 109%) Marginal Unsatisfactory (4.00-5.49) (71%-99%) Inefficient Poor (2.00-3.99) (31%-70%) Unacceptable Very Poor (0.00-1.99) (0-30%)
PERFORMANCE Exceed targets/ standards 190% 170% 150% 130% 110% of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards
POINTS 10 9 8 7 6 5.5 5 4 3 2 1
On target
100% of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards of targets/ standards
Does not meet targets/ standards 90% 70% 50% 30% 10%
Approved:
Confirmed: