Creat de Law Works LLC

Geiger v. Kitzhaber Legal Filings US District Court Oregon 2013 - 2014

Bringing marriage equality to Oregon for gay, lesbian, and transgender couples

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Ninth Circuit Grants Oregon Motion To Dismiss NOMs Appeal
Autor
14-35420 #197 - Opinion Re Lifting Stay
Autor
State of Oregon and Multnomah County Reply Motion To Dismiss in Geiger v. Kitzhaber 9th Circuit
Autor
Nom Petition For Rehearing en Banc To 9TH Circuit
Autor
State of Oregon and Multnomah County Defendants' Response To NOM's Application To US Supreme Court For Stay of Proceedings in Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
Plaintiffs' Response To NOM - National Organization For Marriage's Application For Stay in Geiger v. Kitzhaber No.A13-1173
Autor
State of Oregon's Motion To Dismiss in 9th Circuit NOM's Appeal of Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
US Supreme Court Denies NOM's Application For Stay
Autor
NOM's Application To United States Supreme Court To Stay Judgment Pending Appeal
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: NOM's Reply Brief About Intervention
Autor
NOM National Organization For Marriage Response To Motion To Dismiss in 9th Circuit in Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
TRANSCRIPT - Geiger v. Kitzhaber - Oregon Marriage Equality Case - Hearing On NOM (National Organization Against Marriage) Motion To Intervene - Aka Wedding Crashers Turned Away
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber Final Opinion Decision Oregon Gay Marriage
Autor
Oregon and Multnomah County Response To NOM's Motion To Intervene Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
State's Supplemental Authority in Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State Response To Law Suit: State Will Not Defend. Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Final Amended Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment 6:13-cv-01834-MC
Autor
Declaration in Support of State's Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
Nike and 35 Other Businesses File Amicus Brief in Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
States Response To Motion For Summary Judgment Oregon Gay Marriage Geiger V Kitzhaber
Autor
Transcript: Geiger v. Kitzhaber April 23, 2014
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Rummell Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment
Autor
Joint Response of Plaintiffs Opposing NOM Intervention Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Lake Perriguey's Declaration in Opposition To Basic Rights Oregon Education Fund's Motion To Consolidate
Autor
Multnomah County Response To Summary Judgment 6:13-CV-01834-MC Geiger v. Kitzhaber Oregon Gay Marriage Lawsuit
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State of Oregon Answer To First Amended Complaint
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State's Response To Consolidation
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Plaintiffs Amended Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Response in Opposition To Basic Rights Oregon Education Fund's Motion To Consolidate
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Basic Rights Oregon Reply To Opposition To Consolidation
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Basic Rights Oregon's Memo Motion To Consolidate
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Legal Complaint To Strike Oregon's Discriminatory Ban On Equal Access To Marriage
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber First Amended Complaint
Autor
Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Multnomah County Answer Geiger v. Kitzhaber
Autor

Geiger v. Kitzhaber Legal Filings US District Court Oregon 2013 - 2014

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Ninth Circuit Grants Oregon Motion To Dismiss NOMs Appeal

14-35420 #197 - Opinion Re Lifting Stay

State of Oregon and Multnomah County Reply Motion To Dismiss in Geiger v. Kitzhaber 9th Circuit

Nom Petition For Rehearing en Banc To 9TH Circuit

State of Oregon and Multnomah County Defendants' Response To NOM's Application To US Supreme Court For Stay of Proceedings in Geiger v. Kitzhaber

Plaintiffs' Response To NOM - National Organization For Marriage's Application For Stay in Geiger v. Kitzhaber No.A13-1173

State of Oregon's Motion To Dismiss in 9th Circuit NOM's Appeal of Geiger v. Kitzhaber

US Supreme Court Denies NOM's Application For Stay

NOM's Application To United States Supreme Court To Stay Judgment Pending Appeal

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: NOM's Reply Brief About Intervention

NOM National Organization For Marriage Response To Motion To Dismiss in 9th Circuit in Geiger v. Kitzhaber

TRANSCRIPT - Geiger v. Kitzhaber - Oregon Marriage Equality Case - Hearing On NOM (National Organization Against Marriage) Motion To Intervene - Aka Wedding Crashers Turned Away

Geiger v. Kitzhaber Final Opinion Decision Oregon Gay Marriage

Oregon and Multnomah County Response To NOM's Motion To Intervene Geiger v. Kitzhaber

State's Supplemental Authority in Geiger v. Kitzhaber

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State Response To Law Suit: State Will Not Defend. Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Final Amended Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment 6:13-cv-01834-MC

Declaration in Support of State's Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment Geiger v. Kitzhaber

Nike and 35 Other Businesses File Amicus Brief in Geiger v. Kitzhaber

States Response To Motion For Summary Judgment Oregon Gay Marriage Geiger V Kitzhaber

Transcript: Geiger v. Kitzhaber April 23, 2014

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Rummell Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment

Joint Response of Plaintiffs Opposing NOM Intervention Geiger v. Kitzhaber

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Lake Perriguey's Declaration in Opposition To Basic Rights Oregon Education Fund's Motion To Consolidate

Multnomah County Response To Summary Judgment 6:13-CV-01834-MC Geiger v. Kitzhaber Oregon Gay Marriage Lawsuit

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State of Oregon Answer To First Amended Complaint

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: State's Response To Consolidation

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Plaintiffs Amended Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Response in Opposition To Basic Rights Oregon Education Fund's Motion To Consolidate

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Basic Rights Oregon Reply To Opposition To Consolidation

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Basic Rights Oregon's Memo Motion To Consolidate

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Legal Complaint To Strike Oregon's Discriminatory Ban On Equal Access To Marriage

Geiger v. Kitzhaber First Amended Complaint

Geiger v. Kitzhaber: Multnomah County Answer Geiger v. Kitzhaber