Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

January 2020 Hunter v. Hunter

January 2020 Hunter v. Hunter

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia


January 2020 Hunter v. Hunter

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia

ratings:
Length:
35 minutes
Released:
Feb 13, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert   www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com Granted Appeal Summary Case CHARLES M. HUNTER, JR. v. ELEANOR A. HUNTER, IN HER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED THERESA E. HUNTER RECOVABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT, ET AL. (Record Number 190260) From The Circuit Court of the City of Williamsburg and James City County; M. McGinty, Judge. Counsel William W. Sleeth, III and Brett C. Herbert (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP) for appellant. Daniel R. Quarles (Otey Smith & Quarles) for appellee. Assignments of Error The Trial Court erred by misreading the Complaint and Chip’s request for relief, in that he first sought a declaratory judgment that his Complaint would not trigger the No Contest Clause. The Trial Court erred by not holding that the Complaint fell within the safe harbor set forth in Virginia Foundation of Independent Colleges v. Goodrich. The Trial Court erred by finding that Chip’s conduct fell within the scope of the No Contest Clause in the Theresa Trust. The Trial Court erred by applying the No Contest Clause in the Theresa Trust to Chip, despite Eleanor owing Chip non-waivable duties to account under Virginia common law, specifically via this Court’s holding in Fletcher v. Fletcher. The Trial Court erred by applying the No Contest Clause in the Theresa Trust to Chip, despite the various obligations under the Virginia Uniform Trust Code that the Theresa Trust did not purport to waive (or could not legally waive). The Trial Court erred by applying the No Contest Clause in the Theresa Trust to Chip, despite Virginia public policy requiring Eleanor to provide an accounting and/or information to Chip, and prohibiting the application of the No Contest Clause in this case. The Trial Court erred by not holding that Virginia law recognizes a good faith exception to in terrorem clauses in trusts, and by not holding that Chip’s conduct was protected by such good faith exception [note: request for extension of Virginia case law on this issue, from Womble v. Gunter, 198 Va. 522, 528, 95 S.E.2d 213, 218 (1956)]. Source Document: http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/190260.pdf
Released:
Feb 13, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Public domain audio of oral arguments from the Supreme Court of Virginia. Whether you're a lawyer, law student, or just an interested citizen, this podcast is a great way to learn how the Supreme Court of Virginia operates and what's expected of each side in a case. Not affiliated with the Supreme Court of VA. Created by entrepreneurs.