Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
10/2/2012 10/2/2012
INTRODUCTION
10/2/2012
LITERATURE REVIEW
10/2/2012
THEORITECAL FRAMEWORK
10/2/2012
RESEARCH DESIGN
10/2/2012
DEMOGRAPHICS
10/2/2012
ANALYSIS
10/2/2012
QUESTIONS
10/2/2012
Introduction
Objective
Effect of the branding strategies, network service and service plans of various telecom companies of Nepal on the consumer choice. Also, to find out which of the various companies are doing well by examination of peoples perspective on the telecom services of Nepal.
Outcome
The outcome of this research will help the various telecom companies to have an idea about the consumers perspective and their current status in comparison to other companies.
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
Review of Literature
The telecommunication service was initially commenced on 1970 B.S, in Nepal. Came into formal existence only after the establishment of MOHAN AKASHWANI in 2005 B.S. According to the First National Five year plan (2012-2017), Telecommunication Department was established in 2016 B.S. Converted into Telecommunications Development Board in 2026 B.S. as per the third five-year plan (2023-2028) Enactment of Communications Corporation Act 2028 Turned out into a fully owned Government Corporation called Nepal Telecommunications Corporation in 2032 B.S.
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
NCELL
First private operator in the GSM standard in Nepal. Established on 2004 AD as Spice Nepal Pvt Ltd and broke the NTC monopoly. Commercially launched its only GSM service under the Mero Mobile brand on September 17, 2005 A.D.
10/2/2012
26.66 %
26.66 %
20.00 % 10/2/2012
Smart Telecom
Telecommunications Service (RTS) provided license in July 1, 2008 A.D. Launched its VSAT services on 26th November 2009 A.D. and the GSM service since 9thJuly 2010. Launched its services by building a mixed network of fixed and wireless technology, whichever is appropriate for the location.
10/2/2012
Statement of problem
What is the brand position and status of various telecom companies according to the consumers point of view?
Hypothesis
Set 1: H0: Choice of selection is independent of branding and advertisements. HA: Choice of selection depends on branding and advertisements. Set 2: H0: Choice of selection is independent of quality of network provided. HA: Choice of selection depends on quality of network provided. Set 3: H0: Choice of selection is independent of the versatility of service plan. HA: Choice of selection depends on the versatility of service plan.
10/2/2012
Theoretical framework
10/2/2012
Research Design
Descriptive research design was adopted for the research. The questionnaire method was used to collect the data which were administered through face to face interview with the consumers and retailers. The sample size and the sample were selected based on convenience sampling method.
The study was restricted to Kathmandu city. The sample size for consumers was 150 (aged between 15-60).
10/2/2012
Demographics
Age Composition
10% 17% 11% 40%
10-20 yrs 20-30 yrs
Gender
20%
42%
60%
Male Female
Occupation
13%
Marital Status
Student Business Man Employed
13%
22%
37%
37% 63%
Single Married
15%
Retired Others
10/2/2012
25%
10,000-25,000
NCELL
47%
32%
UTL SMART
Brand Usage
3% 2% 22%
NTC NCELL
73%
UTL SMART
10/2/2012
Monthly Usage
20%
< Rs. 500 Rs. 500-1000 Rs. 1000-2000
GPRS Usage
34%
Yes
8%
31%
25%
66%
No
34%
39%
67%
Yes No
27%
Not Using
10/2/2012
18%
Yes No
81%
2% Ranking 8%
NTC
36%
54%
10/2/2012
N of Valid Cases 150 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.67. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
The chi-square test of dependency between choice of selection and branding and advertisements shows that the asymmetric significance is .216 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, we accept H0 i.e. both these parameters are independent of each other. From the above Chi-square results for NTC, NCELL, UTL and SMART we can conclude that branding and advertisements do not have effect on the choice of selection of consumers. Very less portion of people are affected by advertising and branding promotions in the market. 10/2/2012
5 5 1
a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.93.
The chi-square test of dependency between choice of selection and the quality of network provided shows that the asymmetric significance is .002 which is smaller than 0.05. Hence, we reject H0 i.e. both these parameters are independent of each other. Therefore it is concluded that quality of network provided determines his/her choice of service provider telecom company. It can be thus said that the choice of selection of consumers is highly dependent on the quality of network provided by the telecom companies. 10/2/2012
N of Valid Cases
150
a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .23.
The chi-square test of dependency between choice of selection and the versatility of service plan shows that the asymmetric significance is .002 which is smaller than 0.05. Hence, we reject H0 i.e. both these parameters are independent of each other. Therefore it is concluded that versatility of service plan provided determines his/her choice of service provider telecom company. Thus, it can be concluded that the versatility of the service plan provided affects the choice consumers make while selecting the telecom service brand. 10/2/2012
A Comparative study of various levels of satisfaction of consumer from different telecom companies:
Importance of Various Attributes to Consumers
160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Quality of Network Quality of Message Service Versatility of Service Plan Affordability Internet Facility Comfortability of Usage
10/2/2012
Axis Title
Highly Satisfied 20 19 2 0
Satisfied 30 46 0 0
Neutral 32 5 0 3
10/2/2012
30
20 10 0 NTC NCELL UTL SMART Highly Satisfied 21 15 0 0
Satisfied 52 48 0 0
Neutral 36 5 2 1
Less Satisfied 17 0 0 2
Not Satisfied 0 4 0 0
10/2/2012
40
30 20 10 0 NTC NCELL UTL SMART Highly Satisfied 15 11 0 0 Satisfied 31 32 0 3 Neutral 70 21 2 0 Less Satisfied 8 2 0 0 Not Satisfied 2 6 0 0
10/2/2012
40
30 20 10 0 NTC NCELL UTL SMART Highly Satisfied 13 6 0 0 Satisfied 64 17 2 0 Neutral 38 37 0 3 Less Satisfied Not Satisfied 9 8 0 0 2 4 0 0
10/2/2012
40
35
30
Axis Title 25 20 15 10 5 0 NTC NCELL UTL SMART Highly Satisfied 17 20 0 0 Satisfied 37 21 0 0 Neutral 39 21 0 0 Less Satisfied Not Satisfied 12 8 0 0 17 2 0 0
10/2/2012
30
20 10 0 NTC NCELL UTL SMART Highly Satisfied 22 11 0 0
Satisfied 53 26 0 0
Neutral 40 29 2 0
Less Satisfied 9 2 0 3
Not Satisfied 2 4 0 0
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
10/2/2012