Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Andrew Ellul, Indiana University Craig W. Holden, Indiana University Pankaj Jain, University of Memphis Robert Jennings, Indiana University
Empirically characterize traders order choice under dynamic market conditions Order submission and cancellation decisions determine liquidity-provision and liquidity-usage
All trades are in decimals Allows automatic execution (Direct+) Have all SuperDOT orders, but no orders worked by floor brokers
Negative Serial Correlation in Order Type -Parlour 98 Prior trader submits market buy consumes liquidity relatively more attractive to submit limit sell replenish liquidity
Cycle of consuming and replenishing liquidity negative serial correlation in order type (MB less likely to follow MB) Puzzle: Biais, Hillion and Spatt (1995) found positive serial correlation in order type (MB more likely to follow MB) LOB will grow more imbalanced and eventually break down
Model traders timeframe for completing trade Impatient choose market orders; Patient choose limit order Extend logic highly impatient choose fast auto ex with little regard for market conditions; More patient choose floor executions with meaningful regard for market conditions
More Literature
Data
NYSE System Order Database (SOD) over April June 2001 148 stocks stratified by price and volume Detailed info on:
order submission (time, type, size, etc.) orders outcome: execution, cancellation, or expiration
Hypotheses 1
Negative Serial Correlation in Order Type for Aggregated Order Flows Hypothesis:
Higher limit buys (sells) in prior 5 min lower limit buys (sells) in current 5 min
Large ask (bid) depth prob limit sell (buy) and prob market sell (buy)
Hypotheses 2
Jump-The-Queue Hypothesis:
Large ask (bid) depth Prob inside limit sell (buy) and prob at or behind limit sell (buy)
Time Prob various order types changes
Methodology
Analyze choices of representative trader = weighted average over all trader types Multinomial logit with 7-way event structure
Market Buy, Market Sell, Limit Buy, Limit Sell, Cancel Buy, Cancel Sell, No Activity
(45% of limit orders are cancelled) No activity event = stock-specific amount of clock time with no order submissions or cancellations Median time between successive order events or 5 minutes, whichever is less For 8 stocks = 1 second; for 50 stocks = 5 minutes
Market buy, market sell, limit buy, limit sell, cancel buy, cancel sell, no activity
Estimate 7 OLS equations with the same independent variables aggregated by 5 min int
Above $30.10 Ask = $30.10 $30.01 - $30.09 Bid = $30.00 Below $30.00
4 types of Limit Buys, 4 types of Limit Sells, Market Buy, Market Sell, Cancel Buy, Cancel Sell, No Activity Event
Explanatory Variables
Last Event Market Buy (dummy) Last Event Market Sell (dummy) Last Event Limit Buy (dummy) Last Event Limit Sell (dummy) Last Event Cancel Buy (dummy) Last Event Cancel Sell (dummy) Relative National Best Bid size (/ shrs outstand) Relative National Best Ask size (/ shrs outstand) Time (number of 5 min since midnight)
Control Variables
Percent Spread Relative Volume (ln vol(t-5)/Shrs outstand) Own Return (% chg in midpoint (5 min)) Own Return Squared Volatility Market Return (5 min % chg SP500 ETF) Time Squared (deviation from midday sqr) U-shape patterns Day Return
Conclusion
Neg Serial Corr in Order Type by Ind Orders = Reject Neg Serial Corr in Order Type by Agg Flows=Support Resolves puzzle and supports Parlour model Short-term Forecasting = Support Jump-the-Que = Support Depth impacts in both ways Time-of-day = Support Supports Bloomfield, OHara, and Saar experimental evidence Trader Impatience = Support Supports Handa & Schwartz logic applied to Auto-ex