Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Pollution is a global problem There are no boundaries Satellite Remote Sensing is the only way to map
be discussed
Pollutants of concern (additional pollutants) SOx, NOx, Ozone, etc (NOx shows significant increase) QA/QC issues
Common monitoring protocol (such as EANET technical manual) Adequacy of monitoring network (strengthening in terms of no. of
10
First preference: Local emission factors for various activities Else use emission factors such as from WB rapid emission inventory Undertake emission factors development (where ever deemed necessary)
Capacity Building
11
12
diesel)
13
14
15
16
Regional Cooperation
Intergovernmental meeting, stakeholders meeting cum coordination meeting
Participating countries should initiate the process of understanding issues arising from TAP
17 Male Declaration
Male declaration on control & prevention of air pollution & its likely transboundary effects
Declaration approved on April 22, 1998
Male Declaration
Development March 1998: Policy Dialogue April 1998: Adoption of the Declaration
Implementation Phase I: Awareness and preparation of the baseline information Phase II: Local capacity development for monitoring and analysis Member states
Iran
Bhutan
Pakistan
Nepal
India
Bangladesh
Maldives
Sri Lanka
19
Objectives
(April 1998)
Strengthen the regional cooperation and stakeholders participation under the Mal Declaration; Strengthen the capacity building programmes initiated Enhance the capacity of NIAs on emission inventory development and Integrated Assessment Modeling Enhance the analytical and impact assessment capability at the national level through integration of findings from local pollution studies and conducting assessment studies; Provide decision support information for policy formulation and air pollution prevention ; Raise awareness for action through targeted dissemination
20 Male Declaration
21
22
23
24
25
101-150
40.5-65.4
155-254
151-200
65.5-150.4
255-354
201-300
Very Unhealth y
150.5-250.4
355-424
27
Case Study 1:
28
29
30
The AOD scale in this image is similar to the U.S. EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) scale, such that red-colored regions indicate unhealthy air.
31
True Color and AOD Images Available on the Internet True Color Images
MODIS instrument: http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/
Click on region of interest. Click on the display alternate dates available for this subset link. Select date of interest (dates are in Julian date format). Repeat for all overlapping regions of interest.
Select Terra or Aqua satellite Select appropriate month, day, and year. Select parameter from pull-down menu; RGB = true color images Click the box next to Aerosol Optical Thickness over land to view aerosol images.
AOD Images
OMI instrument: http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/aerosols/aerosols_v8.html
Scroll to the bottom of the page to select images. Select global image from Choose output pull-down menu. Select OMI: 8/17/2004 Present from coverage satellite pull-down menu. Select appropriate Date to be studied.
32
(temperature,
33
34
with the local emissions and affects ambient air PM10 and PM2.5 levels
35
What is a trajectory?
A trajectory is the time integration of the position of a
parcel's passive transport by the wind is computed/reconstructed by the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model where the velocity vectors used are interpolated in both space and time. (Draxler, R.R. and Rolph, G.D., 2003) be integrated both forward and backward in time
Trajectories may
36
air pollution source regions and specific sources by back computation starting from the receptor
local emissions and affects ambient air PM10 and PM2.5 levels
37
43
AOT, 05-02-2006
44
45
Transboundary fog
In winter season widespread fog and often thick fog occurs
47
Transboundary fog
India
ranks emissions
fourth
among
countries
producing
SO2
This part is the most industrialized part of subcontinent During winter this region is generally in the influence of
high pressure system resulting in dry seasons and low wind speeds
onwards
48
PAKISTAN
INDIA
According to Central Electricity Authority of India, there are 83 coal fired thermal power plants
50 50
51
Experimental Methods
The aerosol samples are collected on Whatman 41 filter
The samples are collected at Lahore from 8 A.M to 8 PM The flow rate was controlled
deionized water and analyzed for SO42- NO3- by ionchromatograph using a Dionex Model 500 equipped with Peaknet software
52
60
40 20 0
25 15 5
Sb x 103 Sb x 103
As x 103
14
10 6 50
Se x 103
NO3-
35 20 100 70
40 10 1 2 3 4
SO42-
No. of Days Concentrations in ug/m3 of SO42- , NO3- , Se, As, and Sb in 12 hour samples at Lahore, Pakistan.
53
Fog
Se x 103
Concentration g/m3
As x 103
NO3-
SO4-2
No. of Days
Concentrations in ug/m3 of SO4 2, NO3-, Se and SO4- 2/Se ratios in 54 aerosol samples at Lahore, Pakistan.
The SO4-2 / Se ratios were suggestive of long-range transport from several hundred kms away in neighbouring India. Such high concentrations pose a serious health risk and require a more detailed study on long-term basis.
55
The SO4-2 concentration varied from 7.29 ug/m3 to 41.89 ug/m3 with an average 18.98 ug/m3 for the period. Se concentration varied from below the detection limit (< 1.58 ng/m3) to 5.90 ng/m3, with a mean of 3.44 ng/m3. The high SO4-2 (72 ug/m3) and Se (12.72 ng/m3) were also observed in samples.
56
Beijing
Shanghai
1999-2000
1999-2000
8.5
6.0
Hong Kong
Tokyo Mumbai Dhaka Lahore Mexico City New York London Paris
1998-2002
1998-1999 1999 2001 2005 1997 2002 1995 1984-85
4.2
5.4 12.6 22 17.6 5.8 <2 2.3 3.8
BC (mg/m3)
20000 40000 60000 80000
0
0:00 0:55 1:50
BC
2:45 3:55 4:50 5:45 6:55 7:50 8:50 10:00 10:55 11:50 12:45 13:40 14:35 15:45 16:40 17:35 19:40 22:20 0:10 2:00 2:55 4:45 5:40 6:50 7:45 8:55
OC
Time
Ozone (ppbv)
40
20
0 0:03:13 2:58:13 5:53:13 8:48:13 12:55:25 15:50:25 18:45:25 21:40:25 0:35:25 3:30:25 6:25:25
Time
EPA PMF
(Positive Matrix Factorization)
69
Receptor model
An alternative for pollutant source identification contributing to the observed chemical concentrations at a receptor site
Receptor modeling utilizes composition data collected at the
receptor site to determine the source attributions. Receptor models are based on the assumption of mass conservation and the use of a mass balance analysis.
70
Developed by Dr. Pentti Paatero, University of Application: In air quality to resolve source types
(source apportionment)
72
PMF Characteristics
Method: Weighted least-squares Utilize error estimates of the data to optimum
75
PMF Characteristics
Input: Ambient concentration data
Uncertainty of ambient data Observations Specified Uncertainties (for each element of each sample, having same number of rows and columns as concentration file) Equation Based Uncertainties
Output
Source compositions (F-factor)
Source contributions (G-factor) Scaled residuals (eij/sij)
76
Data file
Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AL 1016.86 853.37 822.65 1574.65 1074.94 2497.35 120.50 1057.57 998.97 1719.75 AS 0.56 2.61 0.99 1.68 0.97 3.42 1.56 1.02 1.43 1.85 BR 1.29 9.63 8.23 18.03 11.23 38.70 8.91 9.72 40.43 51.05 CE 0.59 0.71 0.31 1.93 0.85 2.03 1.16 1.02 0.93 1.55 CL 675.83 915.45 567.13 710.76 693.22 534.36 399.18 875.76 100.00 1290.81
77
Source Identification/Fingerprint
83
84
Source Identification
1000 100 100
Sea-salt
10
Motorcycle
10 1 100 1
AlAsBrCaCeCl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
1000 100 10
AlAsBrCaCeCl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
Vehicle
10
Charcoal/Wood burning
AlAsBrCaCeCl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
AlAsBrCaCeCl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
Soil
Cement
AlAsBrCaCeCl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
AlAsBrCaCe Cl Fe K LaMnNaSbScSmTi V Zn
86
Summary
Monitoring air pollution is critical Ground-based information is limited High quality satellite measurements are now available to monitor air pollution Satellite information in combination with measurements and models can provide forecasts of air pollution events
89
90
Pollutants of concern (additional pollutants) SOx, NOx, Ozone, etc (NOx shows significant increase) QA/QC issues
Common monitoring protocol (such as EANET technical manual) Adequacy of monitoring network (strengthening in terms of no. of
91
First preference: Local emission factors for various activities Else use emission factors such as from WB rapid emission inventory Undertake emission factors development (where ever deemed necessary)
Capacity Building
92
critical loads
Validation: model prediction vs observed data
Capacity Building
93
alternative energies)
Fuel quality improvement (eg., reduced S in diesel) Improvement in energy efficiency Sharing of information and cooperation in adoption of
94
policy response
95
96
97
Male declaration on control & prevention of air pollution & its likely transboundary effects
Declaration approved on April 22, 1998
Top GHG Emitting Countries CO2 , CH4 , N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6
Country 1. United States 2. China 3. EU-25 4. Russia 5. India 6. Japan 7. Germany 8. Brazil 9. Canada 10. United Kingdom 11. Italy 12. South Korea 13. France 14. Mexico 15. Indonesia MtCO2 equivalent 6,928 4,938 4,725 1,915 1,884 1,317 1,009 851 680 654 531 521 513 512 503 % of World GHGs 20.6 14.7 14.0 5.7 5.6 3.9 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Contd.. 99
Top GHG Emitting Countries CO2 , CH4 , N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6
MtCO2 equivalent 491 482 480 417 381 381 355 341 289 285 25 27,915 5,751 17,355 16,310 % of World GHGs 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 83 17 52 48
Sources & Notes: WRI, CAIT.
100
Country 16. Australia 17. Ukraine 18. Iran 19. South Africa 20. Spain 21. Poland 22. Turkey 23. Saudi Arabia 24. Argentina 25. Pakistan Top Rest of World Developed Developing
g1p G (n x p) gnp
Source p
Source Identification
Element f11 f12 f21 fp1 f1m
Source 1
1000 100 10
Factor
Al As Br Ca Ce Cl Fe K La MnNa Sb ScSm Ti V Zn
fpm
Source p
100 10
F (p x m) Source composition
Al As Br Ca Ce Cl Fe K La MnNa Sb ScSm Ti V Zn
102
Aerosol Scavenging
At remote sites downwind of high emission sources SO42-and were found to be strongly correlated indicating their similar atmospheric removal rates. SO42- in cloud water is produced from both scavenging and in situ SO2 oxidation and can be expressed as
103
The SO4-2/Se ratios are shown in top portion of Fig. 4. The ratios vary from 1800 to 10000, with a mean of 4070, are in the range typically observed at sites in the US and in Pakistan and indicative of substantial contributions to SO4-2 concentration due to the oxidation of SO2. Improved analytical techniques such as increasing the sampled air flow rate from 16 to 100 l/min. will lead improved results. The improved results helps in the detection of Se and reduce the uncertainties in the SO4-2/Se ratios to below 10%.
104