Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Mize (10-23-02)
REFERENCES
Portions of this presentation were adapted from the following: Ostroff, Frank, The Horizontal Organization (New York, Oxford University Press, 1999) Hammer, Michael, Beyond Reengineering (New York, HarperBusiness, 1996)
Hammer, Michael, Process Management and the Future of Six Sigma, MIT Sloan Management Review (42:2, Winter 2002)
Majchrzak, Ann and Qianwei Wang, Breaking the Functional Mindset in Process Organizations, Harvard Business Review (Sept Oct 1996)
Galbraith, Jay, Designing Organizations (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2002)
Mize (10-23-02)
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Comprises the organizational components (units), their relationships and hierarchy Portrays where formal authority and power are located Provides a home and identity for employees
Mize (10-23-02)
Mize (10-23-02)
DEPARTMENTALIZATION
Mize (10-23-02)
Public Relations
Customer Support Production Operations Receiving & Storage Quality Assurance
Product Marketing
Research & Development Distribution
Mize (10-23-02)
Production
Marketing
Production
Marketing
Mize (10-23-02)
HR
Southeas Division International Europe
Accounting Production
South America
Marketing
Asia
Mize (10-23-02)
Product Teams
Customer Teams
Mize (10-23-02)
Internal focus on functional goals rather than outward-looking concentration on winning customers and delivering value
Loss of important information as transactions travel up and down the multiple levels and across the functional departments Fragmentation of performance objectives brought about by a multitude of distinct and fragmented goals
Added expense involved in coordinating the overly fragmented work and departments
Stifling of creativity and initiative of workers at lower levels Slow responsiveness to changes in the external environment and to customer issue
Mize (10-23-02)
10
A foundation of the I.R. was specialization of labor Business processes were decomposed into narrower and narrower tasks Efforts were focused on improving the performance of those individual tasks
Mize (10-23-02)
11
Same as Parts vs. Whole A task is a defined unit of work, usually performed by one person or small group A process is a related group of tasks that together create an outcome of value to a customer Only when all the tasks are performed together as a wholistic process is value created When rewards are based on task performance, the total process performance will usually be sub-optima
Mize (10-23-02)
12
Core Processes
end-to-end work, information and material flows extends across a business (and even beyond the business boundaries) and drives the achievement of fundamental performance objectives to an organizations strategy usually no more than 4 to 10 in a typical organization
Mize (10-23-02)
13
14
Empower individuals and teams to make decisions directly related to their activities in the work flow; provide essential training and education
Ensure cross-trained work teams Retain down-sized functional units as centers of excellence for expertise and careerpath homes for professionals
Measure for end-of-process performance objectives (which are driven by the value proposition)
Mize (10-23-02)
15
The primary focus is external rather than internal, emphasizing the delivery of the value proposition to customers
Value Proposition Definition The set of benefits an enterprise offers at a price attractive to customers and consistent with its financial goals
Mize (10-23-02)
16
Mize (10-23-02)
17
Question: Do they really work? Answer: Yes, provided . . . See HBR article by Majchrzak and Wong
Mize (10-23-02)
18
PROCESS-COMPLETE DEPARTMENTS
Definition: Departments that are able to perform all the cross-functional steps or tasks required to meet customers needs
product design
manufacturing supply chain support tasks
Mize (10-23-02)
19
Result: Process-complete departments had shorter cycle times only if their managers had taken steps to cultivate a collective sense of responsibility
Result: Those process-complete departments which had not taken such steps had longer cycle times than the functionally organized departments
Mize (10-23-02)
20
collaborate
Mize (10-23-02)
21
2.
If companies are not willing to change their culture, they may be better off
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
Process oriented organizations are superior to functional organizations for many situations One size does not fit all in organizational focus. There are still many situations in which the classical vertical organization is superior
Mize (10-23-02)
22