Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The paradigm of development that dominated after the Second World War emphasized state directed, inward-orientated, import-substitution industrialization. Improving the living conditions of the masses was to be achieved through nation wide development plans emphasizing self sufficiency. The analythical framework for deriving investment was the Harrod-Domar model and a simple Keynesian aggregate savings function.
Theories of Modernization
Modernization is the total transformation of a traditional or pre-modern society into the type of technology and associated social and political organization that characterizes the Western world. Countries develop out of a functionalist, evolutionary, system theory of social development that is linear.
Theories of Modernization
Development as modernization leading to modern growth, thus involves the modernization of social relationships and institutions, political relationships and institutions and economic relationships and institutions, or the shift from traditional to modern society. The locus of change is the modern sector, centered on the rationalist values of the enlightenment era and the cultural rise of the modern nation state.
have that: Yt = Ct +St where: Yt = national income; Ct = consumption; St = savings. But we also have that:
(1)
Yt = Ct + It
(2)
Economic modernization
Lewis develops a model of growth which explicitly recognizes developmental differences between countries and makes a further distinction within developing countries by characterising them as dual economies. Labour surplus traditional sector and modern sector in developing countries.
Economic modernization
Traditional sector is agriculture based low technology, capital and worker productivity. Modern sector high productivity manufacturing or urban centered industrialization requires growth in savings and increased capital accumulation.
Economic modernization
Other approaches to modernization Big Push (Rosenstein), Strategic Push (Hirshman) and Stages of Growth (Rostow)
Low productivity agriculture is a large % of the economy Political power dominates economic power Low rates of investment ( < 5% of GDP) Inefficient property rights
From Crafts, Investment: 1750=5%, 1800 = 7%, 1850 = 10% Is this a theory? Are the stages distinct? What qualifies as a leading sector?