Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Evolutionary Cement
An evaluation and suggestion for a sustainable concrete industry
Environmental aspects
~40% from fossil fuels to heat kiln (1450 C) alternative fuels- Cement Sustainability Initiative (tires, plastic insulation, paper)
0.362
0.361 0.279 0.216
Other options
(calcium sulfate, magnesia, and blended OPC cements)
Termed geocements, aluminate cements Source materials can be either pozzolanic or non-pozzolanic
Fly ash, blast furnace slag, metakaolin
28 days
Solution 2
65 85
0.0 1.4
0.0 9.4
8.7 23.3
Solution 3
65
4.3
31.7
52.7
85
39.8
48.2
54.5
Solution 4
NaOH 12 M (solution 1), KOH 18 M (solution 2), NaOH + sodium silicate (solution 3), and KOH + potassium silicate (solution 4).
65
85
0.0
7.7
9.5
34.3
38.7
63.0
Reduced limestone used Reduced kiln temperatures (1160-1200 C) Lower grinding energy Gypsum not fired in kiln High sulfur industrial byproducts
Slag, flue gas desulfurisation sludge, low calcium FA
Zero RMCO2, low FDCO2 Natural and byproduct source material Durability weakness of gypsum
Use dense gypsum (alabaster) or additives (calcium aluminates)
No corrosion protection
Use fibers
Calcinate at 1000C, high RMCO2 Possible water durability issues $, unproven properties
Initiated by lime Low heat of hydration, improved workability 90% of market needs < 3,000 (20 MPa) 80% of SCMs go to landfill, low-value applc.
Low early strengths Characterization of source material Coal not sustainable product
Challenges
OPC well established Conservative nature of construction/design industry More research