Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Lessons learnt
QUALITY DIVISION - PROPELLANTS & CHEMICALS QUALITY ASSURANCE & RELIABILITY - PROPELLANTS & CHEMICALS GROUP SYSTEMS RELIABILITY ENTITY Dt:10-12-2012
Propellant Tear/Separation
Implication of Deviation From mission point of view, separation/ tear within propellant is not allowed. This may cause catastrophic failure of the mission. All the segments of PSOM-FM-56 and FM-58 got rejected. Corrective/Preventive Actions Fine AP is to be added within 2 hrs. of grinding Fine AP to be added in 3 installments against earlier practice of 2 installment Fine AP passed through sieve placed on the kneader during addition to break the lumps, if any Scrapping of blades after each addition of AP to the mixer
Lessons Learnt
Any deviation observed from the standard practice (may be very minor) to be reported immediately to the supervisor and wait for the decision before proceeding further. Visual observation is very important. Carry out visual inspection of the raw materials, mixer, surroundings etc. Moisture is very harmful for propellant. Take all possible steps to prevent ingression of moisture during propellant processing.
Cause:
Before propellant casting, the pressure vessel was covered with a polythene sheet to avoid contamination which was to be removed prior to vacuum casting but it was not removed. As a result, the cast propellant fell on the Polythene sheet and inside the vacuum chamber instead of going into the vessel. Implication:
Hopper
Polythene wrapping
Propellant
Vacuum Chamber
Lessons learnt:
Visual inspection is to be carried out at every step of operation and logged.
Issue: One batch of Adhesive CS2 Part A was rejected due to the formation of precipitate during resin synthesis.
Cause :
During the assembly of the reaction setup, Inlet and outlet of the moisture trap system [H2SO4 based] got interchanged. Due to this, the conc. H2SO4 entered the reaction vessel causing the formation of precipitate during resin synthesis.
Inlet
Conc.H2SO4
Reactants
Corrective / Preventive action: Process document with the reaction setup sketch /drawing is included. Inlet and outlet were properly labeled. Training was provided. Verification of the setup prior to use by the supervisor. Lesson learnt: Precautions are to be taken to avoid such human errors.
Issue: During the electrochemical impregnation step the nickel plaques dissolved into the EI bath instead of the nickel hydroxide active material impregnating into the plaque matrix.
Cause: Due to human error, polarity of the terminals got reversed during the impregnation operation. Implication: The EI bath was rejected. Corrective action:
Cause Lower TBS was due to under curing of Pedcoat liner Insufficient quantity of curative (TDI) was added during liner application During weighing of TDI, empty beaker weight was not tared to zero. As a result lower quantity of TDI was added to the Pedcoat premix
Implication of weighing error Due to poor TBS property, the segment PSO-74-HS got rejected.
Corrective/Preventive Actions Weighing balance with printer is to be used. TDI quantity by volume is also to be verified by putting mark on the outer surface of the glass beaker Curing condition of the liner is to be verified on the sample surface, which is coated along with the main segment.
Lessons Learnt
A minor error in weighing caused the rejection of a PS0 segment Ensure the calibration status of the measuring devices Ensure proper tareing of the container Re-verify the weighing