Prepared by: Rizza M.

De Mesa MAED Administration and Supervision

Prayer

People + Materials + Money

+ Time + Educational Concept

= Desired Results

Table 1: Conceptual Interrelationships Between Administrative Levels, Management Thrusts, and Objectives A Model (Marquiso, 1982)
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LEVELS TOP MANAGEMENT THRUSTS OBJECTIVES

INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT

INSTITUTIONAL GOAL

MIDDLE
LOWER

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
PROJECT MISSION

TOP

Institutional Management

(Institutional Goal)

(Middle)

Program Management

(Program Objective )

(Lower )

Project Management

(Project Mission )

// ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LEVEL // MANAGEMENT THRUSTS // STRUCTURE OF OBJECTIVES

TOP

Institutional Management

(Institutional Goal)
(Program Objective )

(Middle)

Program Management

(Lower )

Project Management

(Project Mission )

// ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LEVEL // MANAGEMENT THRUSTS // STRUCTURE OF OBJECTIVES

Four Derived Relationships: 1. Project management is to be undertaken by lower educational administrators or managers in pursuit of project missions 2. Program management is to be undertaken by middle educational managers in pursuit of program objectives

TOP

Institutional Management

(Institutional Goal)
(Program Objective )

(Middle)

Program Management

(Lower )

Project Management

(Project Mission )

// ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LEVEL // MANAGEMENT THRUSTS // STRUCTURE OF OBJECTIVES

3. Institutional management is to be undertaken by top educational managers in pursuit of institutional goals 4. Together, project missions should lead to the attainment of program objectives, and all program objectives should lead to the attainment of institutional goal.

Description of Major Management Functions Of Top, Middle and Lower Management

To be discussed by: Ms. Aubrey

Fig. 15 Structure of Management Functions A Model

OBJECTIVE ATTAINMENT

PROCESS CONTROL

ROLE PLAY

Fig. 15a. Structure of Management Functions w/ Major Functions

OBJECTIVE ATTAINMENT

PROCESS CONTROL

ROLE PLAY

Direct Programme Manage

Coordinate Complement Enrich

Represent Represent Represent

MANAGEMENT STYLES AND DESIRED QUALITIES OF A MANAGER

Im the BOSS.

MANAGEMENT STYLES
Dominant Filipino Management Styles

Manager 1

By Ernesto E. Franco

The manager is a realist and a hard worker Characteristics: Autocratic, Segurista, does the first things first, has talent, hardworking and knows how to utilize his resources.

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Ernesto E. Franco

Manager 2

Idealist manager, prefer the American type of management. Characteristics: Reflective Technocrat, Very much planning oriented, systematic, thinks carefully before deciding, has definite way of working, has lofty ideas and seeks quality results.

Manager 2 is using Management-by-Libro Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Ernesto E. Franco

Manager 3

The opportunist manager who resorts to short-cuts and rulebreaking, working with least hardship and sweat. Characteristics: Vacillating, unethical, compromising, passes the buck and moneyoriented.

Manager 3 is using Management-by-Lusot Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Ernesto E. Franco

Manager 4

A reconsider-manager who looks at the problem deeply from all angles. Characteristics: realistic, solid, a human resource developer. A forecaster and exceptionally gifted.

Manager 4 is using Management-by-Suyod Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Ernesto E. Franco

Manager 5

Learns his managerials skills by oido or by ear. Characteristics: Has a vast field of practical experiences to conpensate for his lack of formal management education. The opposite of management by libro style. Manager 5 is using Management-by-Oido Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Tomas D. Andres

Manager A
Characteristics: Rule-oriented, has strong personal loyalty to the management, sheer follower, dependent, and has no decision of his own.

He works according to what he feels.

Manager A is using Management-by-Pakiramdam Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

Manager B He sees to it that his subordinates, colleagues, and everybody fear him.
Characteristics: uncommunicative, uses threats and punishments, hostile and arrogant, a slave-driver, he dictates

By Tomas D. Andres

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

Manager C Communicative in all respects, he follows up details

By Tomas D. Andres

Characteristics: He interferes in everything which is under his command demanding religious attention to ones job.

Manager C is using Management-by- Kulit Style

Dominant Filipino Management Styles

By Tomas D. Andres

Manager D Working without direction

Characteristics: Follows kapakapa system , trying the trial-and error method in all that he does.
Manager D is using Management-by- Patsamba-tsamba Style

Desired Qualities of a Manager

Desired Qualities of a Manager

1. SystemOriented
he should of a able to look at the school organization as a system of parts of a coordinated whole.

 He/She

understands and is able to apply the requirements of the planning process as these are related to development, that is progress.

He/She

concentrates on what he can do. Before planning for the future, he/she somehow knockoff existing problems and not wait for these problems to be solved by others or by time.

 He/She

values resources so much, he maximizes their use to get the most effects. He/she should be able to distinguish when or how to use each and with each other.

He/She

must know his/her own function in relation to his peers in the organization. In working out the functions of his personnel, he must make sure that they fully understand what to do toward what direction and be how they would be evaluated.

Manager by kayod (hard work and dedication; introvert and formal

Manager by libro (by the books and established rules; systematic and analytical.

Manager by ugnayan (situational, integrative; reconciler; ideal Pinoy manager

Manager by oido (by ear, based on practical experience, pragmatic)

Manager by lusot (avoids much work; extrovert and informal)

Marquiso, Melchizedek, Educational Administration: A Rational and Structural Approach, 1984 Luthans, Fred Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill International Edition, 1995 Lorenzana, Carlos C., Management Theory and Practice, Rex Bookstore, 2004 France, Ernesto E., Baltazar, Jose D., Conti, Ruben M., Pimentel, Florisito Q., Franco, Donato S., Management in the Philippine Setting, 2011 (reprint), p.273 Franco, Ernesto, Management, Pinoy Style, HR Magazine (May 1979), 22

Abraham Lincoln