Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
David Phillips
Identify the nature persuasion to change attitudes in PR practice Examine persuasion as a PR Tactic Identify the nature and relevance of and ability to change
View the use and application of power. Identify these theories in a PR context.
Learning Outcomes
Bernays: Engineering consent Kevin Maloney : Is persuasion less ethical than negotiation or compromise but does one involve the other? Jaksa & Prichard: say it cannot be seriously maintained that persuasion is bad. Anderson: says its ok as long as PR seek voluntary change in attitudes and/or actions
Theories
Not if 1. Intent is ethical 2. Recipients have free will 3. The content is truthful 4. The audience is autonymous (and can argue back)
Is persuasion propaganda?
Attitude is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's like or dislike for an item. Attitudes are positive, negative or neutral views of an "attitude object": i.e. a person, behaviour or event. People can also be "ambivalent" towards a target, meaning that they simultaneously possess a positive and a negative bias towards the attitude in question. Implicit and explicit attitudes
Attitude
Attitude may be considered as a primitive attribute to the preservation of the self or of the ego.
What is the goal? Changed attitudes Changed opinions Changed beliefs Changed behaviours?
French and Raven: Social power and social influence are found in
Psychological Change
The phenomena of power and influence involve a dyadic relation between two agents which may be viewed from two points of view:
(a) What determines the behaviour of the agent who exerts power? (b) What determines the reactions of the recipient of this behaviour?
For example, a change in someones opinion may be the affect of someone else persuading that person to accept the opinion of him or herself.
This can have affects in groups, because the members driving their opinions onto the others, makes for discussion, which helps the group, come up with great ideas.
Changed opinion
Social influence and power is limited to influence on the person, P, produced by a social agent, O, where O can be either another person, a role, a norm, a group or a part of a group. We do not consider social influence exerted on a group. (French and Raven 151) This means that all groups are interdependent, which means the group depends on its members in order to function. This means that a change in one may produce a change in others. This theory focuses on the primary changes in a group, which are produced directly with social influence, not on other changes, which are not secondary changes.
Social Power is the amount of powers that O is capable of because of some more or less enduring relation to P. This defines the range of power as the set of all systems within which a person has power of strength greater than zero. The example that French and Raven gave us was: A girlfriend may have a broad range of power over her boyfriend but a narrow range of power over her employer.
Social Power
Reward power, which is to think that one has the ability to mediate rewards for him. Coercive power, which is based on the ability for one to punish him. Legitimate power, which states that one person, has a legitimate right to prescribe behaviour for him. Referent power, which is based on identification with the group or leader. Expert power, which is to feel that someone has special knowledge or expertise, which he can benefit from.
LOW Power
HIGH
LOW
A Minimal effort C
B Keep informed
D
Key players
HIGH
Keep satisfied
Identify the nature persuasion to change attitudes in PR practice Examine persuasion as a PR Tactic Identify the nature and relevance of and ability to change
View the use and application of power. Identify these theories in a PR context.