Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
&
Plato
Main character in Plato's dialogues (wrote nothing himself) Ideal personality for the Ancient philosopher:
- Wandered around Athens discoursing with anyone - Challenged the most basic beliefs of the whole community
Both a literary style and actual form of argumentation Generally a dialectic between two thinkers at a time
One usually leads the other into a contradiction through an analysis through searching for consistency among assumed definitions
There is a tendany for Socrates in Plato's dialogues to disrupt the confidence of an expert in their field by deriving paradoxes in their beliefs, or showing the impossibility of an adequet definition for their practice negative method of hypothesis elimination the best hypothesis are discovered through discovering contradictions amongst prior hypothesis, thus eliminating competing theories (often about essential features of things) A way to discover your (and someone else's) actual opinions and biases
Student to Socrates and teacher to Aristotle Founded the Academy in Athens in 385 BCE Unique among philosophers for his incredibly systematic interrelationship between his epistemology, ontology, and ethics (there is a vague hierarchy to these areas as well): Epistemology + Ontology Ethics
Symposium
Apology Phaedo Meno (our reading)
Forms are eternal, universal, necessary essences that make possible finite and contigent objects. The highest form to be pursued is the form of the Good it serves to unify the other forms by finding itself in them, and leads us to the good life.
The
MENO
- Possibly the most important dialogue when it comes to Platonic epistemology in regard specifically to education and whether we can knowingly pursue or be taught virtue. - Entertains several important notions/problems/questions:
1) Can virtue be taught? 2) Is knowledge discovered or remembered? 3) What is the relationship and/or difference between true opinion and knowledge?
Arete
Virtue or Excellence As we saw with Protagoras, Arete can be interpreted by sophists as an excellence in rhetoric and debate (making the weaker argument appear to be stronger). However, this does not follow from a definition of virtue, which is precisely what Socrates/Plato seeks. The challenge posed within the Meno is to discover the whole of virtue, rather than particular virtues (such as justice, temperence, benevelonce, etc.)
Meno's Paradox
A man cannot search for either what he knows or for what he does not know. He cannot search for what he knows for he knows it, there is no need to search nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for.
Basic Premise: Either you know what youre looking for or you dont know what youre looking for.
If knowledge is a state of knowing, and ignorance a state of not knowing, then an ignorant person cannot even begin to learn (know) something that they do not know because they do not know what it is that they are to supposed to learn (know) due to their ignorance of that very thing that they are to know.
Aporia
Revelation through ignorance a state of puzzlement brought about from running into contradictions with one's beliefs.
Socrates explains that this is an important and productive reaction to being aware of one's natural state of ignorance in this present life.
With Socrates' guiding questions, the slave boy does not actually learn anything, since all he does is respond to Socrates' questions and is never directly given any content required for his apparent knowledge of geometry. The slave is shown to
Divine Dispensation
If virtue cannot be taught, it appears that the only real alternative to explain it away as a quality that we can intuitively recognize in others (politicians, Mythological heroes, diviners, etc.) is to conceide that it is somehow passed down from the gods onto man. This is certainly consistent with Plato's idea of the forms since the forms are located in a third realm which is compatable with presence of the dieties of the Greek pantheon.
The obvious moral dilemma here (and a possibly aesthetic one if we consider the virtue of the artist) is that virtue, which can amount to something roughly the same as knowledge for the humans present on earth, become more or less deterministic. That is to say, we are endowed with virtue by entities outside of our control. One cannot, therefore, exercize their (supposed) free will in order to attain virtue... this is obviously a problem if we consider as a part of virtue that of the practice of the will.
Looking back...
The safest general characterization of the European
philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.
Why is Plato just as interesting to most scholars today as his writings have been constantly throughout history? What is the secret to this lasting appeal?