Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
6-2
Learning Objective 3
Reconcile variable costing and absorption costing net operating incomes and explain why the two amounts differ.
6-3
6-4
Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 = = $6 per unit Units produced 25,000 units
6-5
6-6
Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and the number of units produced remained unchanged, the unit cost computations also remain unchanged.
6-7
Variable Costing
$ 900,000 $ 300,000 90,000 390,000 510,000 $ 150,000 100,000
250,000 $ 260,000
6-8
6-9
Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 = = $6 per unit Units produced 25,000 units
6-10
6-11
6-12
In the previous example, 25,000 units were produced each year, but sales increased from 20,000 units in year one to 30,000 units in year two.
In this revised example, production will differ each year while sales will remain constant.
6-13
6-14
Since the number of units produced increased in this example, while the fixed manufacturing overhead remained the same, the absorption unit cost is less.
6-15
6-16
325,000 425,000
250,000 $ 175,000
6-17
6-18
Since the number of units produced decreased in the second year, while the fixed manufacturing overhead remained the same, the absorption unit cost is now higher.
6-19
425,000 325,000
$ 75,000 100,000
175,000 $ 150,000
These are the 20,000 units produced in year 2 at the higher unit cost of $17.50 each.
6-20
6-21
Conclusions
Net operating income is not affected by changes in production using variable costing. Net operating income is affected by changes in production using absorption costing even though the number of units sold is the same each year.
6-22
6-23
6-24
6-25
Global View
Since absorption costing is required for external reporting, most companies also use it for internal reports rather than incurring the additional cost of maintaining a separate variable cost system for internal reporting.
6-26
Absorption Costing
Variable Costing