Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Critical Thinking
A process of examining underlying assumptions Interpreting and evaluating arguments Imagining and exploring alternatives Developing reflective criticisms for the purpose of reaching a reasoned, justifiable conclusion.
l ac i ti r C n i hT gn ik
Analyzing Evaluating
Reasoning
Critical Thinking
Left
Right
Creative Thinking
Critical Thinking
What it IS Reasonable, reflective thinking focused on what to believe or do (Ennis & Milman, 1985) The propensity to engage in an activity with reflective skepticism (McPeck, 1990) Purposeful goal directed thinking (Halpern, 1989) The art of thinking about thinking while thinking to make thinking better (Paul & Heaslip, 1995) Purposeful, self-regulatory judgment (Facione, 1990)
What it is NOT Common sense Spontaneous responses Regular or normal thinking Being critical or judgmental Disorganized Task-oriented Working in isolation Being competitive Inability to communicate with others Lack of concern with motives, facts, underlying reasons Emotion-driven
Critical Thinking Skills Observing Distinguishing relevant from irrelevant data Distinguishing important from unimportant data Validating data Organizing data Categorizing data Finding patterns and relationships Making inferences Stating the problem Suspending judgment Generalizing Transferring knowledge from one situation to another Developing evaluative criteria Hypothesizing Applying knowledge Testing hypothesis Deciding whether hypotheses are correct Making criterion-based evaluation
Assessment
Diagnosis
Planning
Implementation
Evaluation
Persistent Caring Energetic Risk-taker Knowledgeable Resourceful Observant Intuitive out of the box thinker
Creativity
essential part of the critical thinking process ability to develop and implement new and better solutions.
Solutions Evaluated
Decision Making
Decision Making
can be regarded as the mental processes (cognitive process) resulting in the selection of a course of action among several alternatives. Every decision making process produces a final choice. The output can be an action or an opinion of choice.
Decision Making
a process whereby appropriate alternatives are weighed and one is ultimately selected may or may not involve a problem always involves selecting one of several alternatives
Problem Solving
a process whereby a dilemma is identified and corrected involves diagnosing a problem and solving it may not entail on deciding one correct solution
Types of Decisions
1. Routine decisions 2. Adaptive decisions 3. Innovative decisions
Routine Decisions
The type of decisions made: when problems are relatively well defined and common when established rules, policies and procedures can be used to solve them Are more often made by first-level managers than by top administrators Ex: Medication errors (managers actions are guided by policy and report form)
Adaptive decisions
type of decisions made when problems and alternative solutions are somewhat unusual and only partially understood.
Innovative decisions
Type of decisions made when problems are unusual and unclear and creative, novel solutions are necessary.
When nurse managers know the alternatives and the conditions surrounding each alternative. Ex: a nurse manager in the unit wants to decrease the number of venipunctures a patient experiences when an IV is started, as well as reduce costs resulting from failed venipunctures.
3. Decision Making under Risk - availability of each alternative, potential successes, and costs are all associated with probability estimates. Probability is the likelihood that an event will or will not occur.
100% - if something certain is to happen 0% - if it is certain not to happen 50% - if there is a 50-50 chance
expected risk made to accurately determine the probabilities of each alternative. B. Objective Probability- the likelihood that an event will or will not occur based on the facts and reliable information. C. Subjective Probability- the likelihood that an event will or will not occur based on a managers personal judgment and beliefs.
Determining Probabilities
Probability Analysis 60% Filling shifts 100% Fixed wages 50% Filling shifts 70% Fixed wage
Agency A
Agency B
tainty
Objective Probabilities probabilities
Risk
Subjective
Uncert
depends on the managers ability to use information and analysis and on his or her values, beliefs and objectives.
Emphasizes the limitations of the rationality of the decision maker and the situation.
Satisficing
A decision making strategy whereby the individual chooses an alternative that is not ideal but either is good enough (suffices) under existing circumstances to meet minimum standards of acceptance or is the first acceptable alternative.
Decision-Making Techniques
Artificial intelligence computer technology that can diagnose problems and make limited decisions Expert systems computer programs that provide complex data processing, reasoning, and decision making
Decision-Making Techniques
Group Decision Making
a structure and precise method of eliciting written questions, ideas, and reactions from group members a group process in name only because no direct exchange occurs among members.
Stumbling Blocks
Personality Many nurse managers are selected because of their expert clinical skills, not management skills resulting to various unproductive activities.
Stumbling Blocks
Rigidity (inflexible management style)
Nurse
manager has the tendency to look at new things in old ways and from established frame of reference (tunnel vision) A result from ineffective trialand-error problem solving, fear of risk taking, or inherent personality traits.
Stumbling Blocks
Preconceived Ideas
Effective nurse managers do not start out with the preconceived idea that one proposed course of action is right and all others wrong. Those who are certain that only their perception is accurate may never accept the final decision.
Problem Solving
A cognitive processing directed at achieving a goal where no solution method is obvious to the problem solver.
method whereby one solution after another is tried until the problem is solved or appear to be improving. type of problem solving in which a theory is tested to enhance knowledge, understanding, or prediction
Experimentation
A
method whereby one solution after another is tried until the problem is solved or appear to be improving. type of problem solving in which a theory is tested to enhance knowledge, understanding, or prediction
Experimentation
A
Affinity map
A problem is acknowledged and a thoughtful question is raised to stimulate ideas. 2. Without talking among the group, ideas about the problem are generated and recorded on individual slips of paper or cards. 3. The group is asked to organize similar ideas into no more than six categories 4. The group facilitator names the categories, explains the rationale used for the naming process, and ensures agreement on category names.
1.
Affinity map
5. The group is allowed an opportunity to explain their thinking. In doing so, perceptions about the problem are discovered and consensus is built. There is no right or wrong answers; therefore, none of the ideas should be criticized. 6. The affinity map can be used to determine cause and effect relationships. The name of each category is written down in a circular format to create a diagram.
and plans made to immediately start developing the best of them o Develop alternative solutions and combine the best part of several solutions into a superior
worse than expected? What changes have contributed to its success? How can the solution continue to be used and to work?
collectively possess greater knowledge and information than any single member and may access more strategies to solve a problem Groups can deal with more complex problems than a single individual Group members may have greater variety of training and experiences A group may generate more complete, accurate, and less biased information than one person.
Groupthink
A negative phenomenon occurring in highly cohesive, isolated groups in which group members come to think alike, which interferes with critical thinking. Suppresses open, freewheeling discussion Can result in erroneous and damaging situations
preference. Set up several independent work groups Discuss periodically groups deliberations Invite outside members who are not core members Assign role of devils advocate Warning signal from rival Second chance meeting
1.
Janis, 1982
Dialectical Inquiry
Use of formal debate format Formalizes conflict by allowing disagreement Encourages exploration of alternative solutions Reduces emotional aspects of conflict Can be used regardless of a managers feelings.
Risky shift
Phenomenon seen in groups in which riskier, more controversial decisions are made. Groups are more likely to support unusual or unpopular positions
Analyzing Evaluating
Reasoning
Critical Thinking
Left
Right
Creative Thinking
Any Questions?