Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Raghu Loganathan, MD, FCCP Director, Medical ICU & Stroke Center March 2010
Disclosures
Nothing extraordinary in the case reports Use 2 case studies to describe successful implementation of a new protocol
RL
RL
Other Designs
Benson D et al Anaes Analg 1959; vol 38 Bernard S et al Ann Emerg Med 1997; 33(2) Bernard S et al Resuscitation 2003; 56(1)
Meta-analysis
Holtzer M et al Crit Care Med 2005; 33(2)
RL
Bernard (Australian)
VF
Pre ED Cooling Target Temp Hypothermia patients Standard Rx Patients Hypothermia duration Morbidity Reduction Mortality Reduction
Adverse events (sepsis, arrhythmias & Bleeding)
RL
Yes 33 C 43 34 12 hours
ARR 16%, NNT 4
HACA study group, NEJM, 2002 & Bernard SA, NEJM 2002
Case Study -1
69 year old male progressively dyspenic for 5 days EMS found him cyanotic Initial PEA, followed by asystole and V fib Intubated on the field Downtime 26 minutes
Case Study -1
Cold saline: 4.5 liters started within 5 minutes Surface cooling in 25 minutes Central line placed 30 minutes Initial Lactate was 9.3, ScVo2 65% Baseline Temp was 37.2 Target temp reached in 3.4 hours
Double vests used in series
RL
Case Study -1
EKG: no STEMI Mild elevation of troponins ECHO showed depressed EF (30%) with wall motion abnormalities CXR showed lower lobe infiltrates
RL
Case Study -1
Posturing with de-cerebrating signs noted at 5 hours TH continued with sedation and paralytics for shivering Re-warming after 24 hours EEG showed diffuse slowing, no seizures No clinical response when sedation was stopped Day 3; spontaneous eye opening and followed some commands Day 6 Able to follow more commands
RL
Case Study -1
Day 9: Unable to extubate transferred to vent floor Day 17 Trach done Day 23 weaned off Trach Day 25 discharged to SNF March 25th: Trach de-cannulated, ambulating and functioning at baseline
RL
Case Study : 2
72 year old male well known to Lincoln BIBEMS ESRD, Known asthma, Known CAD EMS called for respiratory distress, noted to hypotensive and dyspneic and went into cardiac arrest Wide QRS on 3 lead placed on NRB Subsequently patient agonal, PEA on monitor, 3 blocks from hospital, CPR started immediately
Case Study : 2
Post intubation, noted to be de-cerebrating by ED attending
Hypothermia initiated 40 mins after ROSC Myoclonic jerks observed day 1 36 hours into protocol: patient opens eyes and following simple commands
RL
Patient is comatose (unable to follow commands/ GCS < 6) upon arrival to the hospital in the absence of sedation
RLTime at start of cooling is within 4 hours after ROSC
Purposeful response to verbal commands or noxious stimuli after ROSC and prior to initiation of hypothermia
Absent brainstem function not explained by treatment with sedatives, paralytics or anticholinergic agents A known terminal illness preceding arrest RL? Pregnancy ( Case report showing benefit)
Aa
Aa
RL
RL
Can safely and reliably lower core body temperature by 3-4 C when infused over 50 minutes.
COOLING PROTOCOL
Obtain laboratory tests ASAP:
Beta HCG on all women of childbearing age Arterial blood gas CBC/ platelets / PT / PTT/INR, Fibrinogen Electrolyte panel 7, plus iCa / Mg / Phos , Cl-, Glucose Amylase, Lipase, LFTs, , Lactate, CPK-MB, CK, Troponin Blood Cultures, Urine Cultures, Urinalysis
Toxicology screen if appropriate 12 lead EKG, Chest X-ray Placement of urinary catheter with temperature sensor RLInsertion of Central Line Catheter (subclavian or IJ)
HYPOTHERMIA BUNDLE
TIME ZERO RETURN OF SPONTANEUOUS CIRCULATION (ROSC)
10 MINUTES
15 MINUTES
30 MINUTES
45 MINUTES 4 HOURS
RL
COMPLETE SCREENING & NOTIFY ICU ATTENDING HYPOTHERMIA LABS TO BE SENT OUT START COLD SALINE PLACE CENTRAL LINE IN SUBCLAVIAN PLACE TEMP SENSING FOLEY START SURFACE COOLING ACHIEVE TARGET TEMP OF 32 C
GAYMAR III
Not selling this product
RL
18 INPATIENTS screened
14 PATIENTS COOLED
12 INPATIENTS COOLED
RL
Clinical Characteristics
26 patients cooled
Rhythm:
Vtach/ Vfib = 3 patients Asystole/ PEA = 18 Mixed (VF with asystole/ PEA) = 5 patients
OUTCOMES
26 patients cooled 11/ 26 (42.3%) survived to hospital discharge 10/ 26 (38.4%) had good outcomes
CPS category Description
Conscious and alert with normal function or only slight disability Conscious and alert with moderate disability Conscious with severe disability Comatose or persistent vegetative state Brain dead or death from other causes
Number
1 2 3 4 5
8 2 1 0 15
RL
OUTCOMES BY RHYTHM
Rhythm
VF/ V-tach
Cooled
3
Survived
1 (33.3%)
Asystole / PEA
Mixed (VF/ V-tach and asytole / PEA)
18
5
8 (44.4%)
2 (40%)
RL
Summary of Studies
Neurologic 50% vs 14% Neurologic 23% vs 7% Survival 50% vs 23% Survival 54% vs 33% Neurologic 49% vs 26% Neurologic 55% vs 39% Survival 48% vs 32% Survival 59% vs 45%
RL
Who to Cool ?
Does Rhythm Matter?
Data from RCTs
Suggest VF and VT
Who to cool?
Do Circumstances of Arrest Adequately Predict Outcome?
RL
Practice Parameters: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, NEUROLOGY 2006;67:203210
Complications
RL
SUMMARY
Screening of patients:
Judgement improves with time Rhythm alone should not exclude patients
Most have combined rhythms Information on initial rhythm not always available
Use of bundles helps with rapid implementation and achieving target temp
Performance targets helps
RL
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Phase 2 FDNY hypothermia
Cool Enroute to hospital
MCA ischemic Infarcts Traumatic brain injury SAH patients with increased ICP Hepatic encephalopathy
RL
Old CPR
RL
HYPOTHERMIA
RL