Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Meaning of Numbers
Numbers as codes for labeling purposes(nominal) 1= girl 2=boy 1= RURAL 2= URBAN 1=PGMA 2=RR 3=EV 4=PL 5=FPJ
1=1 12
Stud No. 1 2
Gender Location
Choice
1
2
1
2
1
1
What can you infer from the data given Meaning of Numbers on table below?
Numbers as codes for labeling purposes(nominal) 1= girl 2=boy 1= RURAL 2= URBAN 1=PGMA 2=RR 3=EV 4=PL 5=FPJ
1=1 12
Stud No. 1 2
Gender Location
Choice
1
2
1
2
1
1
Meaning of Numbers
1<2
5= outstanding 4= very satisfactory 3= satisfactory 2= fairly satisfactory 1= needs improvement
<3
12 3
Stud. No 1
Lang Prof 2
Grade 2
2
3 N
1
3 1
1
2 1
Based on the table, when do you fail or Application in the classroom pass a student?
Stud. No 1
Lang Prof 2
Grade 2
2
3 N
1
3 1
1
2 1
Numbers as arbitrary measures for indicating amount or degree based on an arbitrary zero point (interval) Math = 60 Attitude Scale = 25 temperature = 30 degrees
0
0
Numbers arbitrary measures If your as score is zero in a for indicating amount or degree based on measuring instrument that an arbitrary zero point (interval) is inMath interval scale, how = 60 will Attitude you interpret it? Scale = 25 temperature = 30 degrees
0
0
Numbers as true measures indicating measures using scales with true zero point ( ratio) 5 meters 0 n 3 kilos true numerical scales
If your score is zero in a measuring instrument that is in ratio scale, how Numbers as true measures indicating should you interpret it? measures using scales with true zero
point ( ratio) 5 meters 3 kilos
Test Results
Raw scores
Raw score (RS) numerical summary of a students test performance number of items correctly answered ( one correct item gets one point) 30 correct items out of 50 items number of points received on a test ( regardless of the number of points given to an item/task) 30 points out of 50 possible points ( Each task = 10 max points)
Scores are coming from good tests! A good test consists of good items! What is a good item?
(CONTENT VALIDITY)
Discriminates between one who knows and one who doesnt know; between high-achieving and lowachieving
(CONSTRUCT VALIDITY)
Item analysis is good for planning future normreferenced tests Can be used for instructional purposes
I-A data provide basis for efficient class discussion of the test results I-A data provide a basis for remedial work I-A data provide a basis for the general improvement of classroom instruction I-A procedures provide a basis for increased skill in test construction
Classroom
Compare the performance of the highest-scoring students and the lowest-scoring students
Large class top ten vs bottom ten Small class top half vs bottom half
Sample
(Back of item card) Item Analysis Data
Group 1 U-10 L-10 A 1 2 B 8 4 C 0 1 D 1 3 Diff. Disc Index Index .60 0.40
Indices:
Difficulty Index = No. of students in upper group getting item correct + No. of students in lower group getting item correct/ total no. of students who took the test
p = RH + RL N
Discrimination Index = No of students in upper group getting item correct No of students in lower group getting item correct / of the no. of students who took the test
r = (RH RL) Ng
Difficulty (p) indices Discrimination indices 0.91 - 0.95 very easy 0.40 or higher Very Good Item 0.76 - 0.90 easy 0.30 0.39 - Good Item 0.25 - 0.75 average 0. 20 0.29 - Reasonably Good Item 0.10 0.24 difficult 0.10- 0.19 Marginal Item 0.05 0.09 very difficult Below 0.10- Poor Item
In the discussion of the results of the item analysis, the item needs to be revised or rejected when: Almost all in both groups are able to answer the item Both groups find the item too difficult such that almost none are able to answer the item correctly When a negative d is obtained (i.e., more in the low group answered the item Additional information to help you decide which items to eliminate from a test, before it is again administered is to analyze the distractors or options.
Conditions: Miskeying the upper group chooses a distractor more frequently than the key A B C D* Example : 1 1 9 2 Guessing each option is chosen with about equal frequency. Example : A B C* D 4 3 3 3 Ambiguity one of the distractors is chosen with about the same frequency as the correct answer by the upper group Example : A B C D* 6 0 1 6
Poor distractor Some distractors are not chosen at all by all students in the upper group. Example : A 4 B 0 C 0 D* 9
ITEM improvement and selection Guidelines: 1. Consideration based on difficulty index and discrimination index Discrimination Index 0.40 and above (Very Good item) 0.30 0.39 (Good item) 0.20 0.29 (Reasonably Good item) 0.10 -0.19 (Marginal Item) Below 0.10 (Poor item) Difficult Difficult Difficult Rejected Difficulty Index
0.24 or lower 0.25 0.75 0.76 or higher