Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Background
Livestock Economy
49.6% of agri. value added and 10.4% of GDP (> major + minor crops)
(ctc)
Flavor milk
Total milk
0.00
11.76
0.00
7.60
0.00
7.93
0.00
4.95
0.01
5.60
0.00
9.36
Low 0.62 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.58
Middle 1.04 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 16.42
High 0.98 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.66
All 0.89 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.01 15.66
OVERALL DEMAND FOR MILK IN PAKISTAN Urban milk consumption Overall milk consumption Population Demand for milk =188 liters/capita/yr = 211 liters/capita/yr = 160 million = 33.76 bl liters/yr
Messages: Meat consumption will be higher in 2020 than DC Milk consumption is higher than DC but gap would increase further
(FAO, 2003, ILRI 1999)
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION TRENDS (Kgs) . Diversification of diets meats, eggs and dairy products Population growth, urbanization and income growth Derived Demand -- creating a veritable livestock revolution New and expanding markets for small livestock producers However, inappropriate policy and misallocation of investment resources could skew the distribution of benefits and opportunities demand for livestock products will lead to intensification of small holders food and feed production system and may
Cow
11 18 19 11 14 7 9 3 7 0 0 2
Buffalo
31 19 15 9 7 8 4 2 2 2 1 0
Others(Dairy Farm)
80 85 8
75 75 11
Surf
White cement
3
2
0
2
1
0
3
2
4
3
2
2
Oil
Corn Flour Other
Source: FAO 2007
1
1 1
1
9 4
0
7 5
1
1 1
1
8 2
Cattle
29.56 14.48 (49) 6.80 (23) 5.91 (20)
Buffaloes
27.33 17.76 (65) 7.38 (27) 1.91 (7)
Sheep
26.49 6.36 (24) 3.97 (15) 3.44 (13) 12.72 (48)
Goats
53.79 19.90 (37) 12.37 (23) 9.68 (18) 11.83 (22)
Others
5.69 2.65 (47) 1.36 (24) 0.76 (13) 0.91 (16)
Total
142.86 61.16 (43) 31.89 (22) 21.71 (15) 28.10 (13)
2.36 0.27 (8) (1) Agriculture Censes, 2006 Figure in parenthesis are percentage
Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan, 1955-2006 C>B in beginning of 1955; C>B reached peak in 1960; B>C in 1996 but in 2006 C>B Source: Hasnain & Khan 2007
15.56
10.22
9.896 (64)
6.233 (61)
4.393 (28)
3.051 (30)
1.090 (7)
0.808 (8)
0.184 (1)
0.130 (1)
38.37
Punjab 22.50 58 %
Sind
10.19 26.3%
NWFP
4.48 11.6%
Buffaloes
Total Goats
14.82
21.89 -
18.90
28.26 -
25.04
38.37 0.32
27.5
29.1 -
32.5
35.6 -
Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan 2006-07 Ave. Annual Lactation length of 250, 305 and 50 days for cows, buffaloes and goats
MILK PRODUCTIVITY
Years No. of dairy farms (million) Average milk animal/farm T. milk/farm/yr) L. milk/ Animal/yr
1247.4
2003
2004 2005 G. Rate % (2000-05)
13.8
14.2 14.7 3.0
1.8
1.8 1.8 -0.4
2.34
2.34 2.34 -0.1
Farm growth nearly stable
1300
1996 1998
2000 2001 2002 2003
26.6 28.1
29.7 30.6 31.5 32.4
20.9 22.0
23.3 23.8 24.5 25.1
1.27 1.28
1.28 1.28 1.29 1.29
2004
2005 G. Rate % (2000-05)
33.4
34.4 2.9
25.7
26.4 2.5
1.30
1.30 0.4
IFCN, Dairy Report, 2007: ECM = Energy Corrected Milk with 4% fat and 3.3% protein
India
Nepal Pakistan Siri Lanka Australia New Zeland Australia
PDDC 2006
987
415 1195 627 4926 3947 4926
1450
850 1909 496
KEY FEATURES OF MILK PROCESSING SECTOR, 2005 Processors Capacity Capacity utilization Average (million monthly Flush Lean liters)
Nestle HFL Milac Vita Halla Prime Nurpur Nirala Dairy crest Engro K&K Butt Dairies Munno Daires Khi Dairies Military 1.3 0.9 0.3 0.05 0.15 0.1 0.15 1 0.15 0.35 0.4 0.06 0.02 0.1 0.18 1.3 0.9 0.3 0.03 0.15 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.15 0 0 0.06 0.02 0 0.18 0.78 0.54 0.18 0.018 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.6 0.09 0 0 0.036 0.012 0 0.108 1.04 0.72 0.24 0.024 0.12 0.08 0.12 0.08 0.12 0 0 0.048 0.016 0 0.144
Total
PDDC, 2006
5.3
3.44
2.064
2.752
= 24
= 16 =2 =1
= 3.23%
100
90 Excess supply converted to ghee, 80 Khoa, butter, powder etc 70 60 Supply 50 40
Supply + water
Months
Rural Subsistence
90%
Assembler
85%
Wholesaler
5%
5% Confectioners
90%
Processing Plants
100%
Bakers
Wholesale market
100%
Retail Store
100%
Consumer
FAO, 2003 Improper milk collection system, Un-hygienic milk handling & Adulteration
(Demand Perspective)
Own animals- Only two percent of urban consumers get milk from
their own animals in big cities, cities and towns
Milk producers: 8 m FHHs with herd size 50 m milch animals, spread across Milk collectors (Dhodies): SSMC-200-400 kg/day from remote areas, De-creamers and khoya markers: milk men stay with
decreamers & Khoya makers on way to town/cities. Some SSMC sell milk to decreamers, decreamers sell part to halwaies & confectioners
long term contracts at predetermined price offering a share of milk price in advance. MSMC400-800 kg/day with a similar manner, carryout door to door milk delivery and sell in some nearby market. LSMC- > 1500-3000 kg/day, purchase from SSMC & MSMC, sell to retail shops, adulteration is practiced by LSMCs
1000 sq.km- 43% with 1-2 animals, 28% 3-4 animals-Producing 80% milk.
Milk processors: small share Consumers Government organizations: PDDC, PDDB, AHComm. (Fed),
L&DDD (Prov). PSDP-Project (Milk collection processing dairy production and dev. Program)-Subsidized livestock services for milk collection and marketing, development of genetically superior animals
35/kg)
Urban Consumers
Self collection on Self the collection basis of on the basis of fat (Rs. 5/kg) fat (Rs. 5/kg)
India
1122 70 101
Pakistan
160 14.7 38.37
276
4% 90 35.8* 33 987* 1450 10-11 45 (18%) 748 81.3
105
4.93 207 8.72 10.22 1195 1909 9-12 2.72 (3.23 %) 24 0.18
Cost of Production $/100kg milk Dairy Plants throughput m lit/day Dairy plants # Capacity m lit/day
50.50
12.38
Federal Govt.: one project costing Rs. 199 million is donor assisted (EU), 1 is project on Avianinflunza, 2 on health components, 1 on animal production Bulk of funds (83%) goes to thee Dairy, Meat and extension Punjab Govt. out of 27 projects 16 (86% funds) on animal production aspects, 6 on animal health, the largest project is on establishment of milk processing plants and milk collection centers at Layya and Sialkot costing 1.15 billion rupees NWFP Govt. out of 11 projects 5 on animal production and on animal health Balochistan Govt. out of 16 projects 9 on animal production, on Vet. Facilities Sind Govt. 87% funds fo animal production with very little for animal health
reproductive efficiency, epidemics of infectious diseases, inadequate feeding and ineffective vet. Cover-- low milk yield Week financial farm performance: Low milk prices, constraints on milk marketing and distribution Underutilization of dairy industry as at present working at 50% of installed capacity processing only 3.23% of milk. Institutional and regulatory issues: Poor investment in infrastructure, establishment and implementation of livestock legislation
There is need to Clarify the issues that are holding back dairy industry development and role of government
that could sustainably improve wellbeing of small holder farmers in dairy, horticulture and poultry value chains
smallholders, agribusiness, public policy and investment priorities.
METHODOLOGY
Field surveys (sampling and questionnaire
development)
Sample Distribution
Items
PRODUCTION & MARKETING i) Multinational ii) Cooperative/ Associations iii) Domestic-Private Sector Contact Farmers Non-Contact Farmers Total Farmers
Dairy
200 200 200 600 300 900
PROCESSORS CONSUMERS
10 1200
Sampling Criteria
Dairy Sector Sheikupura & Kabirwala: Nestle milk area; 100 km radius; 20 Multinational villages 10 regular milk supplier to Hella and 5 non-contact = 300) Nestle Cooperative Hella Private sector Kasur & Okara: Hella milk area; 100 km radius; 20 villages; 10 regular milk supplier to Hella and 5 non-contact = 300) Jhang & Sargodha: Dairy Choudhry milk area; 100 km radius; 20 villages 10 regular milk supplier to Halla and 5 non-contact = 300)
Expected Output
Analytical papers contributing to an increased
understanding of value chains for HVAP Specific output for Policy Implications:
greater involvement of SF in the process of cutting down transaction costs and improving marketing efficiency Needed policy changes for promoting supper markets and retail food chains to benefit SF and consumers Needed policy changes for investment opportunities in value chains, instt. Building and infrastructures